| Revision as of 20:57, 9 March 2023 editDavid Eppstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators226,521 edits →In other areas: p4← Previous edit |
Revision as of 21:03, 9 March 2023 edit undoDavid Eppstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators226,521 edits →In other areas: +wlNext edit → |
| Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
|
|
|
|
== In other areas == |
|
== In other areas == |
|
In the ] family of six cryptographic hash functions, the weakest is SHA-224, named because it produces 224-bit hash values.<ref>{{cite web|title = FIPS Publication 180-2 (with Change Notice 1): Announcing the Secure Hash Standard (+ Change Notice to Include SHA-224)|date=February 25, 2004|publisher=NIST|url=https://csrc.nist.gov/csrc/media/publications/fips/180/2/archive/2002-08-01/documents/fips180-2withchangenotice.pdf|access-date=2023-03-09}}</ref> It was defined in this way so that the number of bits of security it provides (half of its output length, 112 bits) would match the key length of two-key ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3874|title=RFC 3874: A 224-bit One-way Hash Function: SHA-224|first=R.|last=Housley|publisher=Network Working Group|date=September 2004|access-date=2023-03-09}}</ref> |
|
In the ] family of six ]s, the weakest is SHA-224, named because it produces 224-bit hash values.<ref>{{cite web|title = FIPS Publication 180-2 (with Change Notice 1): Announcing the Secure Hash Standard (+ Change Notice to Include SHA-224)|date=February 25, 2004|publisher=NIST|url=https://csrc.nist.gov/csrc/media/publications/fips/180/2/archive/2002-08-01/documents/fips180-2withchangenotice.pdf|access-date=2023-03-09}}</ref> It was defined in this way so that the number of bits of security it provides (half of its output length, 112 bits) would match the key length of two-key ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3874|title=RFC 3874: A 224-bit One-way Hash Function: SHA-224|first=R.|last=Housley|publisher=Network Working Group|date=September 2004|access-date=2023-03-09}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
The ancient Phoenician ] was a standardized measure of ], equal to 224 grains, although other forms of the shekel employed in other ancient cultures (including the Babylonians and Hebrews) had different measures.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Bratcher | first = Robert G. | date = October 1959 | doi = 10.1177/000608445901000404 | issue = 4 | journal = The Bible Translator | pages = 165–174 | publisher = {SAGE} Publications | title = Weights, Money, Measures and Time | volume = 10}}</ref> Likely not coincidentally, as far as ancient ] and ], silver was measured in a unit called a ''tikal'', equal to 224 grains.<ref>{{cite book|title=Coins of Ancient India: From the Earliest Times Down to the Seventh Century A.D.|first=Alexander|last=Cunningham|url=https://archive.org/details/coinsancientind00cunngoog|publisher=B. Quaritch|location=London|year=1891|page=4}}</ref> |
|
The ancient Phoenician ] was a standardized measure of ], equal to 224 grains, although other forms of the shekel employed in other ancient cultures (including the Babylonians and Hebrews) had different measures.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Bratcher | first = Robert G. | date = October 1959 | doi = 10.1177/000608445901000404 | issue = 4 | journal = The Bible Translator | pages = 165–174 | publisher = {SAGE} Publications | title = Weights, Money, Measures and Time | volume = 10}}</ref> Likely not coincidentally, as far as ancient ] and ], silver was measured in a unit called a ''tikal'', equal to 224 grains.<ref>{{cite book|title=Coins of Ancient India: From the Earliest Times Down to the Seventh Century A.D.|first=Alexander|last=Cunningham|url=https://archive.org/details/coinsancientind00cunngoog|publisher=B. Quaritch|location=London|year=1891|page=4}}</ref> |
