Misplaced Pages

Solidarity: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:18, 15 June 2023 editBilljones94 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users124,048 edits Rescuing 8 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5Tag: IABotManagementConsole [1.2]← Previous edit Revision as of 13:50, 30 August 2023 edit undoMoorlock (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,776 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
] in solidarity of the worker movement]] ] in solidarity of the worker movement]]


'''Solidarity''' or '''solidarism''' is an awareness of shared interests, objectives, standards, and sympathies creating a psychological sense of unity of groups or classes.<ref name="dict1">''Merriam Webster'', http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/solidarity {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190508034958/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/solidarity |date=2019-05-08 }}.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thefreedictionary.com/solidarity|title=solidarity|access-date=19 March 2018|via=The Free Dictionary|archive-date=27 January 2004|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040127114556/http://www.thefreedictionary.com/solidarity|url-status=live}}</ref> Unlike ], solidarism does not reject ]s and sees individuals as the basis of ].<ref>{{Cite web|last1=Boston|first1=677 Huntington Avenue|last2=Ma 02115 +1495‑1000|date=2018-10-02|title=Social Solidarity, Human Rights, and Collective Action: Considerations in the Implementation of the National Health Insurance in South Africa|url=https://www.hhrjournal.org/2018/10/social-solidarity-human-rights-and-collective-action-considerations-in-the-implementation-of-the-national-health-insurance-in-south-africa/|access-date=2021-08-30|website=Health and Human Rights|language=en-us|archive-date=2019-01-07|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190107152601/https://www.hhrjournal.org/2018/10/social-solidarity-human-rights-and-collective-action-considerations-in-the-implementation-of-the-national-health-insurance-in-south-africa/|url-status=live}}</ref> It refers to the ] that bind people together as one. The term is generally employed in ] and the other ] as well as in ] and ].<ref>{{cite journal|title=Social Security in Poland – cultural, historical and economical issues|first1=Stanisław|last1=Adamiak|first2=Ewa|last2=Chojnacka|first3=Damian|last3=Walczak|date=1 December 2013|journal=Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting|volume=2|issue=2|pages=11–26|doi=10.12775/cjfa.2013.013|url=http://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/CJFA/article/download/CJFA.2013.013/3189|doi-access=free|access-date=20 September 2019|archive-date=24 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201024200510/https://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/CJFA/article/download/CJFA.2013.013/3189|url-status=live}}</ref> It is also a significant concept in ]; therefore it is a core concept in ] political ideology.<ref name="FitzpatrickKwon2013">{{cite book |last1=Fitzpatrick |first1=Tony |last2=Kwon |first2=Huck-ju |last3= Manning |first3=Nick |author4=James Midgley, Gillian Pascall |title= International Encyclopedia of Social Policy |date= 4 July 2013 |publisher= Routledge |language=en |isbn= 978-1-136-61003-5|page=1866}}</ref> '''Solidarity''' or '''solidarism''' is an awareness of shared interests, objectives, standards, and sympathies creating a psychological sense of unity of groups or classes.<ref name="dict1">{{cite web|url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/solidarity|website=Merriam Webster|title=solidarity (noun)|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190508034958/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/solidarity |archive-date=2019-05-08 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thefreedictionary.com/solidarity|title=solidarity|access-date=19 March 2018|via=The Free Dictionary|archive-date=27 January 2004|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040127114556/http://www.thefreedictionary.com/solidarity|url-status=live}}</ref> Unlike ], solidarism does not reject ]s and sees individuals as the basis of ].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Douwes|first1=Renate|last2=Stuttaford|first2=Maria|last3=London|first3=Leslie|date=2018-10-01|title=Social Solidarity, Human Rights, and Collective Action: Considerations in the Implementation of the National Health Insurance in South Africa|url=https://www.hhrjournal.org/2018/10/social-solidarity-human-rights-and-collective-action-considerations-in-the-implementation-of-the-national-health-insurance-in-south-africa/|access-date=2021-08-30|journal=Health and Human Rights Journal|language=en|archive-date=2019-01-07|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190107152601/https://www.hhrjournal.org/2018/10/social-solidarity-human-rights-and-collective-action-considerations-in-the-implementation-of-the-national-health-insurance-in-south-africa/|url-status=live}}</ref> It refers to the ] that bind people together as one. The term is generally employed in ] and the other ] as well as in ] and ].<ref>{{cite journal|title=Social Security in Poland – cultural, historical and economical issues|first1=Stanisław|last1=Adamiak|first2=Ewa|last2=Chojnacka|first3=Damian|last3=Walczak|date=1 December 2013|journal=Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting|volume=2|issue=2|pages=11–26|doi=10.12775/cjfa.2013.013|url=http://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/CJFA/article/download/CJFA.2013.013/3189|doi-access=free|access-date=20 September 2019|archive-date=24 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201024200510/https://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/CJFA/article/download/CJFA.2013.013/3189|url-status=live}}</ref> It is a significant concept in ] and in ] political ideology.<ref name="FitzpatrickKwon2013">{{cite book |last1=Fitzpatrick |first1=Tony |last2=Kwon |first2=Huck-ju |last3= Manning |first3=Nick |author4=James Midgley, Gillian Pascall |title= International Encyclopedia of Social Policy |date= 4 July 2013 |publisher= Routledge |language=en |isbn= 978-1-136-61003-5|page=1866}}</ref>


{{Christian democracy sidebar}} {{Christian democracy sidebar}}


What forms the basis of solidarity and how it is implemented vary between societies. In ] societies it may be mainly based on ] and shared values while ] societies accumulate various theories as to what contributes to a sense of solidarity, or rather, social cohesion.<ref name="dict1"/> What forms the basis of solidarity, and how it is implemented, vary between societies. In ] societies it may be mainly based on ] and shared values while ] societies accumulate a variety of theories as to what contributes to a sense of solidarity or social cohesion.{{cn|reason=|date=August 2023}}


Solidarity is also one of six principles of the ]<ref>], Title IV</ref> and December 20 of each year is ] recognized as an ]. Concepts of solidarity are mentioned in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D31058%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html |title=Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights |access-date=2019-05-02 |archive-date=2017-10-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171010174232/http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D31058%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html |url-status=live }}</ref> but not defined clearly.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Prainsack|first1=Barbara|last2=Buyx|first2=Alena|date=2012|title=Solidarity in Contemporary Bioethics -- towards a New Approach|journal=Bioethics|volume=26|issue=7|pages=343–350|doi=10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01987.x|pmid=22827315|s2cid=3463430}}</ref> As biotechnology and biomedical enhancement research and production increase, the need for distinct definition of solidarity within healthcare system frameworks is important. It is not mentioned in the ] nor in the United Nations' ] and has hence lesser legal meaning when compared to basic rights. Solidarity is also one of six principles of the ]<ref>], Title IV</ref> and December 20 of each year is ] recognized as an ]. Solidarity is not mentioned in the ] nor in the United Nations' ] and has hence lesser legal meaning when compared to basic rights.
Concepts of solidarity are mentioned in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D31058%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html |title=Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights |access-date=2019-05-02 |archive-date=2017-10-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171010174232/http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D31058%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html |url-status=live }}</ref> but not defined clearly.<ref name=PB2012>{{Cite journal|last1=Prainsack|first1=Barbara|last2=Buyx|first2=Alena|year=2012|title=Solidarity in Contemporary Bioethics—towards a New Approach|journal=Bioethics|volume=26|issue=7|pages=343–350|doi=10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01987.x|pmid=22827315|s2cid=3463430}}</ref> As biotechnology and biomedical enhancement research and production increase, the need for distinct definition of solidarity within healthcare system frameworks is important.{{editorializing|date=August 2023}}


{{Labor|expanded=unions}} {{Labor|expanded=unions}}
Line 17: Line 19:


=== Émile Durkheim === === Émile Durkheim ===
According to ], the types of social solidarity correlate with types of society. Durkheim introduced the terms ]<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Thijssen|first=Peter|date=November 2012|title=From mechanical to organic solidarity, and back: With Honneth beyond Durkheim.|journal=European Journal of Social Theory|volume=15|pages=454–470|via=EBSCO|doi=10.1177/1368431011423589|s2cid=147685052}}</ref> as part of his theory of the development of societies in '']'' (1893). In a society exhibiting mechanical solidarity, its cohesion and integration comes from the homogeneity of individuals—people feel connected through similar work, educational and religious training, and lifestyle. Mechanical solidarity normally operates in traditional small-scale societies.<ref name="dict2">''Collins Dictionary of Sociology'', p405-6.</ref> In ] society, solidarity is usually based on ] ties of familial networks. Organic solidarity comes from the interdependence that arises from specialization of work and the complementarities between people—a development which occurs in modern and industrial societies.<ref name="dict2" /> According to ], the types of social solidarity correlate with types of society. Durkheim introduced the terms ]<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Thijssen|first=Peter|date=November 2012|title=From mechanical to organic solidarity, and back: With Honneth beyond Durkheim.|journal=European Journal of Social Theory|volume=15|pages=454–470|via=EBSCO|doi=10.1177/1368431011423589|s2cid=147685052}}</ref> as part of his theory of the development of societies in '']'' (1893). In a society exhibiting mechanical solidarity, its cohesion and integration comes from the homogeneity of individuals—people feel connected through similar work, educational and religious training, and lifestyle. Mechanical solidarity normally operates in traditional small-scale societies.<ref name="dict2">{{cite book|first1=David|last1=Jary|first2=Julia|last2=Jary|chapter=mechanical and organic solidarity|title=Collins Dictionary of Sociology|publisher=HarperCollins|year=2005|isbn=9780007183999|pages=381–82}}</ref> In ] society, solidarity is usually based on ] ties of familial networks. Organic solidarity comes from the interdependence that arises from specialization of work and the complementarities between people—a development which occurs in modern and industrial societies.<ref name="dict2" />


Although individuals perform different tasks and often have different values and interest, the order and very solidarity of society depends on their reliance on each other to perform their specified tasks. "Organic" here refers to the interdependence of the component parts, and thus social solidarity is maintained in more complex societies through the interdependence of its component parts (e.g., farmers produce the food to feed the factory workers who produce the tractors that allow the farmer to produce the food). Although individuals perform different tasks and often have different values and interests, the order and solidarity of society depends on their reliance on each other to perform their specified tasks. "Organic" refers to the interdependence of the component parts, and thus social solidarity is maintained in more complex societies through the interdependence of its component parts (e.g., farmers produce the food to feed the factory workers who produce the tractors that allow the farmer to produce the food).


=== Peter Kropotkin === === Peter Kropotkin ===
] banner ] ], translating to "Solidarity must become practice"]] ] banner ] ], translating to "Solidarity must become practice"]]
A connection between the biological and the social was of principal importance for the idea of solidarity as expressed by the anarchist ideologist and former Prince ] (1842–1921). In his most famous book, '']'' (1902), written partly in response to Huxleyan Social Darwinism, Kropotkin studied the use of cooperation as a survival mechanism in human societies at their various stages, as well as with animals. According to him, ], or cooperation, within a species has been an important factor in the evolution of social institutions. Solidarity is essential for mutual aid; supportive activity towards other people does not result from the expectation of reward, but rather from instinctive feelings of solidarity.


Anarchist theorist ] (1842–1921) connected the biological and the social in his formulation of solidarity. In his most famous book, '']'' (1902), written partly in response to Huxleyan Social Darwinism, Kropotkin studied the use of cooperation as a survival mechanism in human societies at their various stages, as well as with animals. According to him, ], or cooperation, within a species has been an important factor in the evolution of social institutions. Solidarity is essential for mutual aid; supportive activity towards other people does not result from the expectation of reward, but rather from instinctive feelings of solidarity.
In his introduction to the book, Kropotkin wrote: <blockquote>"The number and importance of mutual-aid institutions which were developed by the creative genius of the savage and half-savage masses, during the earliest clan-period of mankind and still more during the next village-community period, and the immense influence which these early institutions have exercised upon the subsequent development of mankind, down to the present times, induced me to extend my researches to the later, historical periods as well; especially, to study that most interesting period&nbsp;– the free medieval city republics, whose universality and influence upon our modern civilization have not yet been duly appreciated. And finally, I have tried to indicate in brief the immense importance which the mutual-support instincts, inherited by mankind from its extremely long evolution, play even now in our modern society, which is supposed to rest upon the principle "every one for himself, and the State for all," but which it never has succeeded, nor will succeed in realizing".<ref>Kropotkin, P. Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution.&nbsp;– L.: Freedom press, 1998.</ref></blockquote> Kropotkin advocated an alternative economic and social system, which would be coordinated through a horizontal network of voluntary associations with goods distributed in compliance with the physical needs of the individual, rather than according to labour.<ref>

Efremenko D., Evseeva Y. Studies of Social Solidarity in Russia: Tradition and Modern Trends. // American Sociologist, v. 43, 2012, no. 4, pp. 349-365.&nbsp;– NY: Springer Science+Business Media
In his introduction to the book, Kropotkin wrote:
</ref>
{{quote|The number and importance of mutual-aid institutions which were developed by the creative genius of the savage and half-savage masses, during the earliest clan-period of mankind and still more during the next village-community period, and the immense influence which these early institutions have exercised upon the subsequent development of mankind, down to the present times, induced me to extend my researches to the later, historical periods as well; especially, to study that most interesting period—the free medieval city republics, whose universality and influence upon our modern civilization have not yet been duly appreciated. And finally, I have tried to indicate in brief the immense importance which the mutual-support instincts, inherited by mankind from its extremely long evolution, play even now in our modern society, which is supposed to rest upon the principle "every one for himself, and the State for all," but which it never has succeeded, nor will succeed in realizing".<ref>{{cite book|last=Kropotkin|first=Peter|title=Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution|location=New York|publisher=McClure Phillips & Co.|year=1902|url=https://archive.org/details/cu31924030243640/mode/2up?q=%22earliest+clan-period%22|page=}}</ref>}}
Kropotkin advocated an alternative economic and social system, which would be coordinated through a horizontal network of voluntary associations with goods distributed in compliance with the physical needs of the individual, rather than according to labour.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Efremenko|first1=D.|last2=Evseeva|first2=Y.|title=Studies of Social Solidarity in Russia: Tradition and Modern Trends|journal=American Sociologist|volume=43|year=2012|number=4|pages=349–365|location=New York|publisher=Springer Science+Business Media}}</ref>


== Bioethics == == Bioethics ==
Solidarity is a re-emerging concept in contemporary philosophy within various sub-fields of law, ], and ].<ref>{{Citation|title=Solidarity|year=1999|editor=Bayertz, Kurt|location=Dordrecht|publisher=Kluwer Academic Publishers|isbn=978-0-7923-5475-8}}</ref> Early ancient philosophers such as ] and ] discuss solidarity as a ] framework because in order to live a good life one must perform actions and behave in a way that is in solidarity with the community. Solidarity is discussed in philosophy within its various sub-fields of law, ], and ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Solidarity|year=1999|editor-last=Bayertz|editor-first=Kurt|location=Dordrecht|publisher=Kluwer Academic Publishers|isbn=978-0-7923-5475-8}}</ref> Ancient philosophers such as ] and ] discuss solidarity from within a ] framework, because in order to live a good life one must perform actions and behave in a way that is in solidarity with the community.{{cn|reason=where specifically in Plato's & Aristotle's works is solidarity discussed?|date=August 2023}}


One notable approach in ] is to identify solidarity primarily as a three-tiered practice enacted at the interpersonal, communal, and contractual and legal levels.<ref>{{Citation |author=Prainsack, Barbara |author2=Buyx, Alena |year=2012 |title=Solidarity in Contemporary Bioethics&nbsp;– Towards a New Approach |journal=Bioethics |volume=26 |issue=26/7 |pages=343–350 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01987.x|pmid=22827315 |s2cid=3463430 }}</ref> This approach is driven by the quest to differentiate between the diverse applications of the concept and to clarify its meaning, both historically and in terms of its potential as a fruitful concept for contemporary moral, social and political issues.<ref>{{Citation |author=Prainsack, Barbara |author2=Buyx, Alena |year=2011 |title=Solidarity: reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics |publisher=Nuffield Council on Bioethics |location=London |url=http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/solidarity/ |access-date=2013-11-04 |isbn=978-1-904384-25-0 |archive-date=2014-08-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140817233344/http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/solidarity/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The modern practice of bioethics is significantly influenced by Immanuel ] concept of the ]. Pastor and philosopher Fritz Jahr's article "Bio-Ethics: A Review of the Ethical Relationships of Humans to Animals and Plants" refines Kant's original Categorical Imperative discourse<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Sass|first=Hans-Martin|date=December 2007|title=Fritz Jahr's 1927 concept of bioethics|journal=Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal|volume=17|issue=4|pages=279–295|doi=10.1353/ken.2008.0006|issn=1054-6863|pmid=18363267|s2cid=21957991}}</ref> by including the notion of the Bioethical Imperative.<ref name="Sass 2014 221–228">{{Cite journal|last=Sass|first=Hans-Martin|date=2014|title=Bioethik – Bioethics|journal=Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte|volume=56|pages=221–228|jstor=24361919}}</ref> An approach in ] is to identify solidarity as a three-tiered practice enacted at the interpersonal, communal, and contractual and legal levels.{{r|PB2012}} This approach is driven by the quest to differentiate between the diverse applications of the concept and to clarify its meaning, both historically and in terms of its potential as a fruitful concept for contemporary moral, social, and political issues.<ref>{{Citation |last1=Prainsack|first1=Barbara |last2=Buyx|first2=Alena |year=2011 |title=Solidarity: reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics |publisher=Nuffield Council on Bioethics |location=London |url=https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publications/solidarity |access-date=2013-11-04 |isbn=978-1-904384-25-0 |archive-date=2014-08-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140817233344/http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/solidarity/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The modern practice of bioethics is significantly influenced by Immanuel ] concept of the ]. Pastor and philosopher Fritz Jahr's article "Bio-Ethics: A Review of the Ethical Relationships of Humans to Animals and Plants" refines Kant's original Categorical Imperative discourse<ref name=HMS2007>{{Cite journal|last=Sass|first=Hans-Martin|date=December 2007|title=Fritz Jahr's 1927 concept of bioethics|journal=Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal|volume=17|issue=4|pages=279–295|doi=10.1353/ken.2008.0006|issn=1054-6863|pmid=18363267|s2cid=21957991}}</ref> by including the notion of the Bioethical Imperative{{Definition needed|date=August 2023}}.<ref name="Sass 2014 221–228">{{Cite journal|last=Sass|first=Hans-Martin|date=2014|title=Bioethik – Bioethics|journal=Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte|volume=56|pages=221–228|jstor=24361919}}</ref> Biomedical technology has also further introduced solidarity as the pivotal concept in bioethics. Scholars, such as Ori Levi,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Levi|first=Ori|date=2011|title=Will Biomedical Enhancements Undermine Solidarity, Responsibility, Equality and Autonomy?|journal=Bioethics|volume=25|issue=4|pages=177–184|doi=10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01779.x|pmid=20002073|pmc=2888791}}</ref> bring attention to the negative implications of biomedical enhancements.{{Relevance inline|reason=what does this have to do with solidarity specifically?|date=August 2023}} Another scholar, Meulen ter Ruud, discusses{{elucidate|reason=summarize her/his conclusions maybe?|date=August 2023}} the application of solidarity within healthcare systems.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ter Meulen|first=Ruud|date=March 2015|title=Solidarity and Justice in Health Care: A Critical Analysis of Their Relationship|url=http://web.b.ebscohost.com.proxylib.csueastbay.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=ca775723-a36f-4e9e-9698-f5b166bc5956%40sessionmgr103&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=PHL2307207&db=phl|journal=Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy}}</ref>

Biomedical technology has also further introduced solidarity as the pivotal concept in bioethics. Scholars, such as Ori Levi,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Levi|first=Ori|date=2011|title=Will Biomedical Enhancements Undermine Solidarity, Responsibility, Equality and Autonomy?|journal=Bioethics|volume=25|issue=4|pages=177–184|doi=10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01779.x|pmid=20002073|pmc=2888791}}</ref> bring to attention the negative implications of biomedical enhancements. Another scholar, Meulen ter Ruud, discusses the application of solidarity within healthcare systems.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ter Meulen|first=Ruud|date=March 2015|title=Solidarity and Justice in Health Care: A Critical Analysis of Their Relationship|url=http://web.b.ebscohost.com.proxylib.csueastbay.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=ca775723-a36f-4e9e-9698-f5b166bc5956%40sessionmgr103&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=PHL2307207&db=phl|journal=Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy}}</ref>


=== Imperative === === Imperative ===
Fritz Jahr describes that bioethics is ultimately made up of "academic discipline, principle, and virtue".<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Sass|first=Hans-Martin|date=December 2007|title=Fritz Jahr's 1927 concept of bioethics|journal=Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal|volume=17|issue=4|pages=279–295|doi=10.1353/ken.2008.0006|issn=1054-6863|pmid=18363267|s2cid=21957991}}</ref> This echoes back to the deep influence ] has on the normalization of bioethics and its practices. Jahr utilizes Kant's Categorical Imperative to demonstrate the obligatory, yet innately human practice of the Bioethical Imperative:<blockquote>"This results in the guiding principle for our actions is the ''Bioethical Imperative'': Respect every living being in general as an end in itself, and treat it if possible, as such"<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Sass|first=Hans-Martin|date=December 2007|title=Fritz Jahr's 1927 concept of bioethics|journal=Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal|volume=17|issue=4|pages=279–295|doi=10.1353/ken.2008.0006|issn=1054-6863|pmid=18363267|s2cid=21957991}}</ref></blockquote>as it arises in the relationships not only between conscious human being, but also with plants and other animal species. Jahr fully believes that in order to truly practice bioethics, one must be in solidarity with all forms of life.<ref name=":0" /> If one only decides to be in solidarity in humans, then one should not behave virtuously in any manner.<ref name="Sass 2014 221–228"/> Fritz Jahr describes bioethics as ultimately made up of "academic discipline, principle, and virtue".{{r|HMS2007}} This echoes back{{How|date=August 2023}} to the influence ] has on the norms of bioethics and its practices. Jahr utilizes Kant's Categorical Imperative to demonstrate the obligatory, yet innately{{cn|reason=|date=August 2023}} human practice of the Bioethical Imperative:<blockquote>he guiding principle for our actions is the ''Bioethical Imperative'': Respect every living being in general as an end in itself, and treat it if possible, as such{{r|HMS2007}}</blockquote>as it{{ambiguous|reason=what is "it"?|date=August 2023}} arises in the relationships not only between people, but also with plants and other animal species.{{Fragment|date=August 2023}} Jahr believes that in order to practice bioethics, one must be in solidarity with all forms of life.{{r|HMS2007}} If one only decides to be in solidarity in humans, then one should{{ambiguous|reason=prescriptive or descriptive "should"?|date=August 2023}} not behave virtuously in any manner.<ref name="Sass 2014 221–228"/>


== Catholic social teaching == == Catholic social teaching ==
{{Social teachings of the popes}} {{Social teachings of the popes}}
Solidarity is an integral element of ]. According to ]: Solidarity is an element of ]. According to ]:
{{blockquote|No one can remain insensitive to the inequalities that persist in the world ... the Brazilian people, particularly the humblest among you, can offer the world a valuable lesson in solidarity, a word that is too often forgotten or silenced because it is uncomfortable ... I would like to make an appeal to those in possession of greater resources, to public authorities and to all people of good will who are working for social justice: never tire of working for a more just world, marked by greater solidarity<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.catholicsocialteaching.org.uk/themes/solidarity/|title=Solidarity|website=catholicsocialteaching.org.uk|access-date=19 March 2018|archive-date=20 March 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180320135740/http://www.catholicsocialteaching.org.uk/themes/solidarity/|url-status=live}}</ref>}} {{quote|No one can remain insensitive to the inequalities that persist in the world... the Brazilian people, particularly the humblest among you, can offer the world a valuable lesson in solidarity, a word that is too often forgotten or silenced because it is uncomfortable... I would like to make an appeal to those in possession of greater resources, to public authorities and to all people of good will who are working for social justice: never tire of working for a more just world, marked by greater solidarity<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.catholicsocialteaching.org.uk/themes/solidarity/|title=Solidarity|website=Catholic Social Teaching|access-date=19 March 2018|archive-date=20 March 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180320135740/http://www.catholicsocialteaching.org.uk/themes/solidarity/|url-status=dead}}</ref>}}


The Church's teaching on solidarity is explained in the ], and briefly summarised in the ]:<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a3.htm|title=Catechism of the Catholic Church - Social justice|website=www.vatican.va|access-date=2020-04-12|archive-date=2013-11-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105063620/https://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a3.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><blockquote> The Church's teaching on solidarity is explained in the ], and briefly summarised in the ]:<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a3.htm|title=Catechism of the Catholic Church - Social justice|website=www.vatican.va|access-date=2020-04-12|archive-date=2013-11-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105063620/https://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a3.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref>{{quote|
*1939. The principle of solidarity, also articulated in terms of "friendship" or "social charity," is a direct demand of human and Christian brotherhood ; 1939: The principle of solidarity, also articulated in terms of "friendship" or "social charity," is a direct demand of human and Christian brotherhood
*1940. Solidarity is manifested in the first place by the distribution of goods and remuneration for work ... ; 1940: Solidarity is manifested in the first place by the distribution of goods and remuneration for work. It also presupposes the effort for a more just social order where tensions are better able to be reduced and conflicts more readily settled by negotiation.
*1941. Socio-economic problems can be resolved only with the help of all the forms of solidarity: solidarity of the poor among themselves, between rich and poor, of workers among themselves, between employers and employees in a business, solidarity among nations and peoples. International solidarity is a requirement of the moral order; world peace depends in part upon this ; 1941: Socio-economic problems can be resolved only with the help of all the forms of solidarity: solidarity of the poor among themselves, between rich and poor, of workers among themselves, between employers and employees in a business, solidarity among nations and peoples. International solidarity is a requirement of the moral order; world peace depends in part upon this
*1942. The virtue of solidarity goes beyond material goods. In spreading the spiritual goods of the faith, the Church has promoted, and often opened new paths for, the development of temporal goods as well. And so throughout the centuries has the Lord's saying been verified: "Seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things shall be yours as well."</blockquote> ; 1942: The virtue of solidarity goes beyond material goods. In spreading the spiritual goods of the faith, the Church has promoted, and often opened new paths for, the development of temporal goods as well. And so throughout the centuries has the Lord's saying been verified: "Seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things shall be yours as well."}}


== See also == == See also ==
Line 65: Line 66:
== Notes == == Notes ==
{{Reflist}} {{Reflist}}

== References ==
*{{Citation
| last1 = Jary
| first1 = David
| last2 = Jary
| first2 = Julia
| title = Collins Dictionary of Sociology
| publisher = ]
| year = 1991
| location = Glasgow
| url = https://archive.org/details/collinsdictionar0000jary/page/774
| isbn = 978-0-00-470804-1
| page =
| url-access = registration
}}


== Further reading == == Further reading ==
* {{cite book | last=Ankerl | first=Guy | title=Towards a Social Contract on a World-wide Scale | date=1980 | isbn=92-9014-165-4}}
* – article by Themistoklis Tzimas, GroJIL Vol 6, No 2 (2018): International Legal Reformation
* {{cite journal | last=Davies | first=Ben | last2=Savulescu | first2=Julian | title=Solidarity and Responsibility in Health Care | journal=Public Health Ethics | publisher=Oxford University Press (OUP) | volume=12 | issue=2 | date=1 July 2019 | issn=1754-9981 | doi=10.1093/phe/phz008 | pages=133–144}}
* – paper by Ashley Taylor at Social Policy, The University of Edinburgh, January 2014
* {{citation | last=Kołtan | first=Jacek | chapter=What Solidarity of the Future?|title=Solidarity and the Crisis of Trust|editor-first=Jacek|editor-last=Kołtan|publisher=]|location=Gdansk|year=2016|pages=133–143|chapter-url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318012758_Afterword_What_Solidarity_of_the_Future_in_Solidarity_and_the_Crisis_of_Trust_ed_Jacek_Koltan_European_Solidarity_Centre_Gdansk_2016_pp_133-143}}
* : Solidarity Contract, Geneva, ILO, 1980, {{ISBN|92-9014-165-4}}
* {{citation|url=http://www.socialpolicy.ed.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/141330/JWI_Solidarity_Obligations_and_Expressions.pdf|url-status=dead|title=Solidarity: Obligations and Expressions|first=Ashley|last=Taylor|publisher=Just World Institute|date=May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200807082827/http://www.socialpolicy.ed.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/141330/JWI_Solidarity_Obligations_and_Expressions.pdf|archive-date=2020-08-07}}
* – article by Ben Davies and Julian Savulescu, Public Health Ethics, Volume 12, Issue 2, July 2019, Pages 133–144, 4 July 2019
* {{cite journal|url=https://ugp.rug.nl/GROJIL/article/view/35459|title=Solidarity as a Principle of International Law: Its Application in Consensual Intervention|first=Themistoklis|last=Tzimas|journal=Groningen Journal of International Law|volume=6|number=2|year=2018}}
* – article by Jacek Kołtan in: Solidarity and the Crisis of Trust, ed. Jacek Koltan, ]: Gdansk 2016, pp.&nbsp;133–143


{{Christian Democracy}} {{Christian Democracy}}

Revision as of 13:50, 30 August 2023

Unity of feeling or action on a common interest This article is about the social principle. For the Polish trade union, see Solidarity (Polish trade union). For other uses, see Solidarity (disambiguation).
A raised fist in solidarity of the worker movement

Solidarity or solidarism is an awareness of shared interests, objectives, standards, and sympathies creating a psychological sense of unity of groups or classes. Unlike collectivism, solidarism does not reject individuals and sees individuals as the basis of society. It refers to the ties in a society that bind people together as one. The term is generally employed in sociology and the other social sciences as well as in philosophy and bioethics. It is a significant concept in Catholic social teaching and in Christian democratic political ideology.

Part of a series on
Christian democracy
Principles
Philosophers
Politicians
Parties
Organizations
Documents
Related topics
Christian cross Christianity portal

What forms the basis of solidarity, and how it is implemented, vary between societies. In Global South societies it may be mainly based on kinship and shared values while Global North societies accumulate a variety of theories as to what contributes to a sense of solidarity or social cohesion.

Solidarity is also one of six principles of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and December 20 of each year is International Human Solidarity Day recognized as an international observance. Solidarity is not mentioned in the European Convention on Human Rights nor in the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights and has hence lesser legal meaning when compared to basic rights.

Concepts of solidarity are mentioned in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, but not defined clearly. As biotechnology and biomedical enhancement research and production increase, the need for distinct definition of solidarity within healthcare system frameworks is important.

Part of a series on
Organized labour
Labour movement
Labour rights
Trade unions
Strike action
Labour parties
Academic disciplines
The Helsinki City Theatre in Helsinki, Finland illuminated in the colors of the flag of Ukraine, in solidarity with Ukraine during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine

Discourse

Émile Durkheim

According to Émile Durkheim, the types of social solidarity correlate with types of society. Durkheim introduced the terms mechanical and organic solidarity as part of his theory of the development of societies in The Division of Labour in Society (1893). In a society exhibiting mechanical solidarity, its cohesion and integration comes from the homogeneity of individuals—people feel connected through similar work, educational and religious training, and lifestyle. Mechanical solidarity normally operates in traditional small-scale societies. In tribal society, solidarity is usually based on kinship ties of familial networks. Organic solidarity comes from the interdependence that arises from specialization of work and the complementarities between people—a development which occurs in modern and industrial societies.

Although individuals perform different tasks and often have different values and interests, the order and solidarity of society depends on their reliance on each other to perform their specified tasks. "Organic" refers to the interdependence of the component parts, and thus social solidarity is maintained in more complex societies through the interdependence of its component parts (e.g., farmers produce the food to feed the factory workers who produce the tractors that allow the farmer to produce the food).

Peter Kropotkin

Anarchist banner Dresden Germany, translating to "Solidarity must become practice"

Anarchist theorist Peter Kropotkin (1842–1921) connected the biological and the social in his formulation of solidarity. In his most famous book, Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution (1902), written partly in response to Huxleyan Social Darwinism, Kropotkin studied the use of cooperation as a survival mechanism in human societies at their various stages, as well as with animals. According to him, mutual aid, or cooperation, within a species has been an important factor in the evolution of social institutions. Solidarity is essential for mutual aid; supportive activity towards other people does not result from the expectation of reward, but rather from instinctive feelings of solidarity.

In his introduction to the book, Kropotkin wrote:

The number and importance of mutual-aid institutions which were developed by the creative genius of the savage and half-savage masses, during the earliest clan-period of mankind and still more during the next village-community period, and the immense influence which these early institutions have exercised upon the subsequent development of mankind, down to the present times, induced me to extend my researches to the later, historical periods as well; especially, to study that most interesting period—the free medieval city republics, whose universality and influence upon our modern civilization have not yet been duly appreciated. And finally, I have tried to indicate in brief the immense importance which the mutual-support instincts, inherited by mankind from its extremely long evolution, play even now in our modern society, which is supposed to rest upon the principle "every one for himself, and the State for all," but which it never has succeeded, nor will succeed in realizing".

Kropotkin advocated an alternative economic and social system, which would be coordinated through a horizontal network of voluntary associations with goods distributed in compliance with the physical needs of the individual, rather than according to labour.

Bioethics

Solidarity is discussed in philosophy within its various sub-fields of law, ethics, and political philosophy. Ancient philosophers such as Socrates and Aristotle discuss solidarity from within a virtue ethics framework, because in order to live a good life one must perform actions and behave in a way that is in solidarity with the community.

An approach in bioethics is to identify solidarity as a three-tiered practice enacted at the interpersonal, communal, and contractual and legal levels. This approach is driven by the quest to differentiate between the diverse applications of the concept and to clarify its meaning, both historically and in terms of its potential as a fruitful concept for contemporary moral, social, and political issues. The modern practice of bioethics is significantly influenced by Immanuel Kant's concept of the Categorical Imperative. Pastor and philosopher Fritz Jahr's article "Bio-Ethics: A Review of the Ethical Relationships of Humans to Animals and Plants" refines Kant's original Categorical Imperative discourse by including the notion of the Bioethical Imperative. Biomedical technology has also further introduced solidarity as the pivotal concept in bioethics. Scholars, such as Ori Levi, bring attention to the negative implications of biomedical enhancements. Another scholar, Meulen ter Ruud, discusses the application of solidarity within healthcare systems.

Imperative

Fritz Jahr describes bioethics as ultimately made up of "academic discipline, principle, and virtue". This echoes back to the influence Socrates has on the norms of bioethics and its practices. Jahr utilizes Kant's Categorical Imperative to demonstrate the obligatory, yet innately human practice of the Bioethical Imperative:

he guiding principle for our actions is the Bioethical Imperative: Respect every living being in general as an end in itself, and treat it if possible, as such

as it arises in the relationships not only between people, but also with plants and other animal species. Jahr believes that in order to practice bioethics, one must be in solidarity with all forms of life. If one only decides to be in solidarity in humans, then one should not behave virtuously in any manner.

Catholic social teaching

Part of a series on
Catholic social teaching
Emblem of the Holy SeeEmblem of the Holy See
Overview
Pope Leo XIII
Pope Pius XI
Pope Pius XII
Pope John XXIII
Second Vatican Council
Pope Paul VI
Pope John Paul II
Pope Benedict XVI
Pope Francis
Other figures
icon Catholicism portal

Solidarity is an element of Catholic social teaching. According to Pope Francis:

No one can remain insensitive to the inequalities that persist in the world... the Brazilian people, particularly the humblest among you, can offer the world a valuable lesson in solidarity, a word that is too often forgotten or silenced because it is uncomfortable... I would like to make an appeal to those in possession of greater resources, to public authorities and to all people of good will who are working for social justice: never tire of working for a more just world, marked by greater solidarity

The Church's teaching on solidarity is explained in the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, and briefly summarised in the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

1939
The principle of solidarity, also articulated in terms of "friendship" or "social charity," is a direct demand of human and Christian brotherhood
1940
Solidarity is manifested in the first place by the distribution of goods and remuneration for work. It also presupposes the effort for a more just social order where tensions are better able to be reduced and conflicts more readily settled by negotiation.
1941
Socio-economic problems can be resolved only with the help of all the forms of solidarity: solidarity of the poor among themselves, between rich and poor, of workers among themselves, between employers and employees in a business, solidarity among nations and peoples. International solidarity is a requirement of the moral order; world peace depends in part upon this
1942
The virtue of solidarity goes beyond material goods. In spreading the spiritual goods of the faith, the Church has promoted, and often opened new paths for, the development of temporal goods as well. And so throughout the centuries has the Lord's saying been verified: "Seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things shall be yours as well."

See also

Notes

  1. "solidarity (noun)". Merriam Webster. Archived from the original on 2019-05-08.
  2. "solidarity". Archived from the original on 27 January 2004. Retrieved 19 March 2018 – via The Free Dictionary.
  3. Douwes, Renate; Stuttaford, Maria; London, Leslie (2018-10-01). "Social Solidarity, Human Rights, and Collective Action: Considerations in the Implementation of the National Health Insurance in South Africa". Health and Human Rights Journal. Archived from the original on 2019-01-07. Retrieved 2021-08-30.
  4. Adamiak, Stanisław; Chojnacka, Ewa; Walczak, Damian (1 December 2013). "Social Security in Poland – cultural, historical and economical issues". Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting. 2 (2): 11–26. doi:10.12775/cjfa.2013.013. Archived from the original on 24 October 2020. Retrieved 20 September 2019.
  5. Fitzpatrick, Tony; Kwon, Huck-ju; Manning, Nick; James Midgley, Gillian Pascall (4 July 2013). International Encyclopedia of Social Policy. Routledge. p. 1866. ISBN 978-1-136-61003-5.
  6. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Title IV
  7. "Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights". Archived from the original on 2017-10-10. Retrieved 2019-05-02.
  8. ^ Prainsack, Barbara; Buyx, Alena (2012). "Solidarity in Contemporary Bioethics—towards a New Approach". Bioethics. 26 (7): 343–350. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01987.x. PMID 22827315. S2CID 3463430.
  9. Thijssen, Peter (November 2012). "From mechanical to organic solidarity, and back: With Honneth beyond Durkheim". European Journal of Social Theory. 15: 454–470. doi:10.1177/1368431011423589. S2CID 147685052 – via EBSCO.
  10. ^ Jary, David; Jary, Julia (2005). "mechanical and organic solidarity". Collins Dictionary of Sociology. HarperCollins. pp. 381–82. ISBN 9780007183999.
  11. Kropotkin, Peter (1902). Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. New York: McClure Phillips & Co. p. xv.
  12. Efremenko, D.; Evseeva, Y. (2012). "Studies of Social Solidarity in Russia: Tradition and Modern Trends". American Sociologist. 43 (4). New York: Springer Science+Business Media: 349–365.
  13. Bayertz, Kurt, ed. (1999). Solidarity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN 978-0-7923-5475-8.
  14. Prainsack, Barbara; Buyx, Alena (2011), Solidarity: reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics, London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, ISBN 978-1-904384-25-0, archived from the original on 2014-08-17, retrieved 2013-11-04
  15. ^ Sass, Hans-Martin (December 2007). "Fritz Jahr's 1927 concept of bioethics". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 17 (4): 279–295. doi:10.1353/ken.2008.0006. ISSN 1054-6863. PMID 18363267. S2CID 21957991.
  16. ^ Sass, Hans-Martin (2014). "Bioethik – Bioethics". Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte. 56: 221–228. JSTOR 24361919.
  17. Levi, Ori (2011). "Will Biomedical Enhancements Undermine Solidarity, Responsibility, Equality and Autonomy?". Bioethics. 25 (4): 177–184. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01779.x. PMC 2888791. PMID 20002073.
  18. Ter Meulen, Ruud (March 2015). "Solidarity and Justice in Health Care: A Critical Analysis of Their Relationship". Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy.
  19. "Solidarity". Catholic Social Teaching. Archived from the original on 20 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  20. "Catechism of the Catholic Church - Social justice". www.vatican.va. Archived from the original on 2013-11-05. Retrieved 2020-04-12.

Further reading

Christian democracy
Principles
Philosophers
  • Arizmendiarrieta
  • Baader
  • Belloc
  • Berggrav
  • Chesterton
  • Day
  • Dooyeweerd
  • Gebhardt
  • Gilson
  • Görres
  • Groen
  • Habsburg
  • John Paul II
  • Ketteler
  • Korfanty
  • Lamennais
  • Leo XIII
  • Lewis
  • Maritain
  • Mounier
  • Nell-Breuning
  • Ozanam
  • Pesch
  • Pius XI
  • Pottier
  • Röpke
  • Stein
  • Sturzo
  • Tischner
  • Vogelsang
  • Williams
  • Politicians
  • Adenauer
  • Andreotti
  • Beel
  • Busch
  • Buzek
  • Caldera
  • De Gasperi
  • Erhard
  • Frei
  • Groen
  • Joseph
  • Ketteler
  • Kohl
  • Korfanty
  • Kurz
  • Kuyper
  • Letta
  • Lipinski
  • Martens
  • Mazowiecki
  • Merkel
  • Metsola
  • Mikołajczyk
  • Moro
  • Quadros
  • Pastrana
  • Pethrus
  • Pöttering
  • Prodi
  • Schäffer
  • Schuman
  • Söder
  • Stegerwald
  • Strauss
  • Sturzo
  • Tindemans
  • Vogelsang
  • von der Leyen
  • Wałęsa
  • Weber
  • Windthorst
  • Parties
  • American Solidarity Party
  • Austrian People's Party
  • Christian Democracy
  • Christian Democratic Appeal
  • Christian Democratic and Flemish
  • Christian Democratic Party
  • Christian Democratic People's Party
  • Christian Democratic Union of Germany
  • Christian Social People's Party
  • Christian Social Union in Bavaria
  • Centre Party
  • Civic Platform
  • Croatian Democratic Union
  • Democratic Rally
  • Fianna Fáil
  • Fine Gael
  • Kataeb Party
  • National Action Party
  • National Party
  • Nationalist Party
  • New Democracy
  • Patriotic Union
  • People's Party
  • Polish People's Party
  • Popular Republican Movement
  • VMRO-DPMNE
  • More
  • Organisations
  • Catholic Action
  • Centrist Democrat International
  • Christian Democrat Organization of America
  • European People's Party
  • European Christian Political Movement
  • Konrad Adenauer Foundation
  • Conservative Christian Fellowship
  • Centre for European Studies
  • European Ideas Network
  • Schuman Foundation
  • Center for Public Justice
  • Paneuropean Union
  • Documents
  • Rerum novarum
  • Populorum progressio
  • Graves de communi re
  • Quadragesimo anno
  • Laborem exercens
  • Sollicitudo rei socialis
  • Centesimus annus
  • Laudato si'
  • Related topics
  • Catholic Church and politics
  • Christian left
  • Christian right
  • Clerical philosophers
  • Ethical socialism
  • Integralism
  • Illiberal democracy
  • Religious democracy
  • Social democracy
  • Traditionalist Catholicism
  • Nationalism
    Development
    By type
    Organizations
    Related concepts
    Conservatism
    Schools
    by region
    International
    Asia
    China
    Iran
    Israel
    Japan
    South Korea
    Turkey
    Other
    Europe
    France
    Germany
    Italy
    Poland
    Russia
    Spain
    United
    Kingdom
    Other
    Latin America
    Argentina
    Brazil
    Chile
    Other
    North America
    Canada
    United
    States
    Oceania
    Philosophy
    Principles
    Intellectuals
    Politics
    Organisations
    Politicians
    Religion
    Historical
    background
    Related
    Ideologies
    Virtues
    About virtues
    Virtue families
    Individual virtues
    Chinese
    Greek
    Indian
    Latin
    Other
    Solidarity at Misplaced Pages's sister projects:

    Categories: