Revision as of 19:58, 30 October 2005 view sourceHogeye (talk | contribs)3,004 edits rv to NPOV version favored by PlayersPlace and me. Your vote is a sham. I count 2 "nays" in the past 10 minutes.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:29, 30 October 2005 view source Bk0 (talk | contribs)2,431 edits rv to consensus version (historical)Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Anarchism}} | |||
'''Anarchism''' can refer to any of a range of political views, characterized by a rejection of authority in various forms. | |||
'''Anarchism''' is a generic term describing various ] and ]s that advocate the elimination of all forms of ]. In place of centralized political structures, private ownership of the means of production, and exploitative economic institutions such as ] and ], these movements favor social relations based upon voluntary interaction and self-management, and aspire to a society characterised by autonomy and freedom. These philosophies use '']'' to mean a ] based on ] interaction of ] individuals, and the idea that communities and individuals have a say in decisions to the degree that they are affected by their outcomes. | |||
The term means "being without rule", and is derived from the ] word '']'', from ]'s Greek term '']'' (αν ''an-'' "without" plus αρχία ''arkhia'' meaning "command" or "rule"). Based on this etymology, anarchists are typically described as rejecting all forms of rule or domination, including all instances of enforced or representational government and any concept of the ], and instead favouring social relations that are voluntarily and freely established among individuals. While not all anarchists accept this definition, this is the sense in which the term is commonly used in everyday speech. | |||
While opposition to coercive institutions and socially constructed hierarchies are primary tenets of anarchism, anarchism is also a positive vision of how a voluntary society would work. There is considerable variation amongst anarchist philosophies. Opinions differ in various areas, such as whether ] should be employed to foster anarchism, what type of economic system should exist, questions on the environment and industrialism, and anarchists' roles in other movements. | |||
Anarchism comprises various ] espoused by ] and ]s that advocate the elimination of the ], and what are believed to be authoritarian social and economic relationships. Direct democracy (majority rule) is considered another form of authority and thus "authoritarian." In the place of centralized political and economic structures these movements favor social relations based upon what are seen as voluntary relationships. These philosophies use '']'' to mean a ] based on ] interaction of ] individuals. There is considerable vagueness as to how decisions would be made by free associations of individuals; is "consensus" majority rule or minority rule? Philosophical anarchist thought does not advocate ] or ] — it refers to "anarchy" as a manner of human relations that is intentionally established and maintained. | |||
The terms "anarchy" and "anarchism" are derived from the ] '']'' ("without ]s (rulers)"). Thus "anarchism," in its most general meaning, is the belief that rulership is unnecessary and should be abolished. The word "anarchy", as most anarchists use it, does not imply ] or ], but rather a stateless society with voluntary social relations. | |||
There is considerable variation among the anarchist political philosophies. Opinions differ in various areas, such as whether ] should be employed to foster anarchism, what type of economic system should exist, whether ] or unequal wealth distribution is opposed, questions on the environment and industrialism, and anarchists role in various movements. Also, throughout history various anarchists of particular schools of anarchism have claimed that other particular schools, to which they do not subscribe, are not forms of anarchism. | |||
==History of anarchism== | |||
=== Precursors of anarchism === | |||
== Precursors of anarchism == | |||
In the hunter-gatherer period before recorded ], human society lived mainly in super-families. Thus there was no ], little accumulated wealth or division of labour, and no decreed law or rulers. This is sometimes called primitive anarchy or ]. | |||
Some anarchists have embraced ], which developed in ], as a source of anarchistic attitudes . | |||
===Primitive cultures=== | |||
] assert that, for the longest period before recorded ], human society was organized on anarchist principles. They point to the egalitarian structure of hunter-gatherer bands, to the lack of division of labour and accumulated wealth, and the lack of decreed law, as indicators of such primitive anarchy. | |||
===Philosophical traces=== | |||
Some anarchists have embraced ], which developed in ], as a source of anarchistic attitudes . Similarly, anarchistic tendencies can be traced to the philosophers of ], such as ], the founder of the ], and ], who said that the wise should not give up their ] to the state . | |||
Later movements – such as ] in the 1300's, the ] in the ], | |||
the ]s, ], and the Ranters, | |||
– have also expounded ideas that have been interpreted as anarchist. | |||
===Ancient Greece=== | |||
The first known usage of the word ''anarchy'' appears in the play '']'' by ], dated ]. There, ] openly refuses to abide by the rulers' decree to leave her brother Polyneices' body unburied, as punishment for his participation in the attack on ], saying that "even if no one else is willing to share in burying him I will bury him alone and risk the peril of burying my own brother. Nor am I ashamed to act in defiant opposition to the rulers of the city (''ekhous apiston tênd anarkhian polei'')". | The first known usage of the word ''anarchy'' appears in the play '']'' by ], dated ]. There, ] openly refuses to abide by the rulers' decree to leave her brother Polyneices' body unburied, as punishment for his participation in the attack on ], saying that "even if no one else is willing to share in burying him I will bury him alone and risk the peril of burying my own brother. Nor am I ashamed to act in defiant opposition to the rulers of the city (''ekhous apiston tênd anarkhian polei'')". | ||
Ancient Greece also saw the first western instance of anarchism as a philosophical ideal, in the form of the ] philosopher ], who was, according to ], "he best exponent of Anarchist philosophy in ancient Greece". As summarized by Kropotkin, Zeno "repudiated the omnipotence of the state, its intervention and regimentation, and proclaimed the sovereignty of the moral law of the individual". Within ], Zeno's vision of a free community without government is opposed to the state-] of ]. Zeno argued that although the necessary instinct of self-preservation leads humans to ], nature has supplied a corrective to it by providing man with another instinct — ]. Like |
Ancient Greece also saw the first western instance of anarchism as a philosophical ideal, in the form of the ] philosopher ], who was, according to ], "he best exponent of Anarchist philosophy in ancient Greece". As summarized by Kropotkin, Zeno "repudiated the omnipotence of the state, its intervention and regimentation, and proclaimed the sovereignty of the moral law of the individual". Within ], Zeno's vision of a free community without government is opposed to the state-] of ]. Zeno argued that although the necessary instinct of self-preservation leads humans to ], nature has supplied a corrective to it by providing man with another instinct — ]. Like many modern anarchists, he believed that if people follow their instincts, they will have no need of law, ], or ], no ]s and no public ], and use no ] (a ] taking the place of the exchanges). Zeno's beliefs have only reached us as fragmentary quotations. | ||
===The Anabaptists=== | |||
The ]s of ] Europe are sometimes considered to be religious forerunners of modern anarchism. ], in his '']'', writes that the Anabaptists "repudiated all law, since they held that the good man will be guided at every moment by ]...rom this premise they arrive at communism...." The novel ] by ] provides a fictional depiction of this movement and its revolutionary ideology. ] of ], who published a pamphlet calling for communal ownership and social and economic organization in small agrarian communities in the ], is considered another of the forerunners of modern anarchism. | |||
==History of anarchism== | |||
Later movements – such as ] in the 1300's, the ] in the ], the ]s, ], and the Ranters, – have also expounded ideas that have been interpreted as anarchist. | |||
===Justice against the state=== | |||
The ]s of ] Europe are sometimes considered to be religious forerunners of modern anarchism. ], in his '']'', writes that the Anabaptists "repudiated all law, since they held that the good man will be guided at every moment by ]...rom this premise they arrive at communism...." The novel ] provides a fictional depiction of this movement and its revolutionary ideology. In 1548 ] wrote , an essay which explored the question of why people obey rulers. ] of ], who published a pamphlet calling for communal ownership and social and economic organization in small agrarian communities in the ], is considered another of the forerunners of modern anarchism. | |||
], in " (]) wrote what would become core anarchist critiques of government, economics, and society; though he did not use the word ''anarchism'', some today regard him as the "founder of philosophical anarchism" | |||
It should be noted that an essay explicitly advocating the absence of government ("") was written and published anonymously in 1756 by ] -- a man widely acknowledged to be the founding-father of modern ]. Upon discovery that he was the author of the anonymous essay, Burke dismissed the writing as satire. There is some conflict involved over the sincerity of Burke's dismissal of "Vindication..."; a most notable contribution to the debate is Murray Rothbard's 1958 essay Other anarchists, such as Godwin and Tucker, have been known to consider the essay to be an important contribution to their philosophy. | |||
By "political justice" Godwin meant "the adoption of any principle of morality and truth into the practice of a community," and his characteristically anarchist conclusion was that government in fact inhibits rather than fosters justice. | |||
===Modern anarchism=== | |||
In ] ] published '''', in which he presented his vision of a free society alongside a critique of government. Some consider this the first anarchist treatise, calling Godwin the "founder of philosophical anarchism". Other than the spontaneous association that may arise when individuals defend each other from aggressors, Godwin opposes every kind of cooperation in labor among individuals (even orchestras are opposed). He is an early proponent of ], supporting a right of an individual to own property, defining it as "the empire to which every man is entitled over the produce of his own industry," but advocating that individuals voluntarily share their surplus property with those who have a need for it. | |||
Godwin's philosophy was optimistic about the potential for human beings to develop and conduct social relations on the basis of reason and consent. He believed that there are no innate principles, and therefore no original propensity to evil. He considered that "our virtues and our vices may be traced to the incidents which make the history of our lives, and if these incidents could be divested of every improper tendency, vice would be extirpated from the world." The control of man by man in general, and the institution of government in particular, are detrimental to human development. "Government by its very nature counteracts the improvement of original mind." | |||
] of ], author of "" in ] was the first individual to call himself an "anarchist." Proudhon advocated a non-coercive market economy where individuals would trade the produce of their labor. Exchange value of goods within such an economy was to be determined by the amount of labor exerted in their production. Proudhon did not use the term "property" in a consistent way. While he is famous for saying "property is theft" in early writings, at that time he was defining property as anything that was not the product of labor (e.g. unused land) that was held by individuals and was protected by government force. Titles granted to land that was not in use by the owner would allow individuals to charge rent to others who wished to use it, which Proudhon opposed. Later, he began using the term "property" to refer to the ownership of produce of labor, which he strongly supported. Proudhon held that property was an essential element of liberty: "Where shall we find a power capable of counter-balancing the... State? There is none other than property... The absolute right of the State is in conflict with the absolute right of the property owner. Property is the greatest revolutionary force which exists" (''Theory of Property'') He opposed profit in all economic transactions, viewing it as being paid without laboring --labor being the sole source of legitimate property. He coined the term "]" to label the theoretical economic system where goods and services would be traded without profit. He preferred the abolition of government, but he did not believe that its total elimination was possible, so advocated its minimization: "...the institutions of the police, preventative and repressive methods officialdom, taxation etc., are reduced to a minimum..." | |||
Godwin's masterpiece was published in ], in the last stages of the ]. The themes of his work, some of which he later retracted, would become central to the future development of anarchism. But at this point no anarchist movement yet existed, and the term 'anarchiste' was known only as an insult hurled by the ] ] at more elements in the revolution. (Some of whom, the ] ], are seen by many as the immediate predecessors of working-class anarchism.) | |||
], an American, and a coeval of Proudhon's, authored an individualistic philosophy of a similar nature to Proudon's that explicitly opposed the existence of government (though they worked without apparent knowledge of each other). Warren had been writing about and practicing an economic system based on the ] by which exchange was facilitated by the medium of "]." This was the practical exercise of the mutualist economic system that Proudhon later theorized. Many consider the periodical that Warren published and edited beginning in 1833, called ''The Peaceful Revolutionist'', to be the first anarchist periodical. Individualists, taking much from the writings of ], among others, emphasized to the utmost extent the ] of the individual. While some individualists looked to ] to justify individualism, Stirner's "Egoism" held that ] is the only legitimate justification for action. | |||
===What is property?=== | |||
] were often labeled "anarchists" by ], even though they did not call for the abolition of the State. Still, they did promote the idea of a minimal State, ], and the responsibility of the people to judge their governments, which provided a groundwork for the development of anarchist thought. "" (1849) by ] is a good example of an anti-statist liberal tract. A clear precursor of ] was ], who wrote about private defense agencies in (1849). This was one of the first attempts to solve the problem of security in a stateless manner. In the ], anarchist thoughts were expressed in the writings of ] (]), Josiah Warren, and Benjamin Tucker. Individualist anarchists such as Tucker were influenced by the writings of ] and ], among others. The American tradition of individualist anarchism is firmly in support of individual sovereignty, private property, wages, and a free market economy. However, they see violations of "]" (based in the labor theory of value) as exploitative, and as a result oppose profit in all economic relations. Nevertheless, they will allow it to occur if the result of contract --contract being the ultimate source of law. Their position on profit is that it would be near impossible if government ceased to exist, due to release of privileged capital and proliferation of competition. | |||
] (1809-1865)]] | |||
Later in the ], anarchist theorists like ] and ] like ] took a slightly different stance on how to establish the utmost liberty of the individual. They drew from the ] critique of capitalism and came to the conclusion that workplaces and economic production under capitalism were unavoidably authoritarian and exploitative, suppressing the liberty of the individual just as much, if not more than the State. They argued that both capitalism and the State needed to be abolished and replaced with more democratic ways of living and producing. Furthermore, they argued that gift economies were preferable to free market systems, although Bakunin was less ardent about this point than about workplace democracy (see ]). | |||
It's commonly held that it wasn't until ] published "" in ] that the term "anarchist" was adopted as a self-description. It is for this reason that some claim Proudhon as the founder of modern anarchist theory. | |||
In "" Proudhon answers with the famous accusation "Property is theft." He opposed the institution of property (propriete) involving full 'rights of use and abuse' as it exists in capitalism; but he supported a more limited right of 'possession' (possession) by individuals of the means and produce of their own labour. Proudhon's vision of anarchy (which he called mutualism (mutuellisme)) thus involved a non-coercive exchange economy where individuals would trade the produce of their labour. This would be a market system without profit; goods would be traded on the basis of the labour time; a national bank would lend without interest to support production. Without property interests to protect, the state would become superfluous. | |||
In short, Bakunin and Kropotkin emphasized the importance of a communal perspective to maintain individual liberty in a social context, and the critical role of workers self-managed organs of production and creation. The ] was an organisation of workers, including both anarchists and Marxists. Both sides had a common aim (stateless communism) and common political opponents (conservatives and other right-wing elements). But each was critical of the other, and the inherent conflict between the two groups soon embodied itself in an ongoing argument between ], representative of anarchist ideas, and ] himself. Generally Marx wanted to work within the system, use hierarchical organizational structures, and run people in elections. Bakunin hated these ideas, and predicted that if a revolution were won under a Marxist revolutionary party, they would end up being as bad as the ] that they fought against. However, ] saw a need to defend the ] against oppression and overthrow the ruling class, and he predicted that democratic committes would arise in future revolutionary periods and fulfill this role. Nevertheless, in ], the conflict in the First International climaxed with the expulsion of Bakunin and those who had become known as the "Bakuninists" when they were outvoted and outmanouvered by the Marx's supporters at the ]. This is often cited as the origins of the ]. | |||
Proudhon generally opposed violent expropriation of property; instead he tended to advocate schemes (including the formation of an interest-free bank) whereby workers would create mutual organisations that could come to supplant capitalism and render the state superfluous. Proudhon's ideas began to exert some influence within French working class movements, and his followers were active in the ]. However authoritarian socialist tendencies such as ] were a stronger force in Proudhon's own time. | |||
]'s ] developed from his ] theory based on ] in which co-operation equalled or surpassed competition in importance, as illustrated in '']'' (]). | |||
Proudhon's work on property raised a central issue in the future development of anarchism. The question of property, and its place in an anarchist society, is sometimes seen as dividing anarchism thereafter into two major streams or tendencies which can loosely be called 'individualism' and 'collectivism'. | |||
Some ]aries of this time such as the ]s encouraged acts of ] such as ]ings and the ]s of ] to further anarchism. However, these actions were regarded by many anarchists as counter-productive or ineffective (see "]", below). | |||
===The International - Anarchism becomes a mass movement=== | |||
In the late ], ] developed as the industrialized form of ''libertarian communism'', emphasizing ]s, especially the ], as the primary strategy to achieve anarchist revolution, and "build the new society in the shell of the old". | |||
In Europe, a period of harsh reaction following the widespread revolutionary activity of ]. The next major phase of revolutionary activity began almost twenty years later with the founding of the ], also sometimes called the 'First International, in London in ]. | |||
Anarchists played a major role in many of the ]s, uprisings, and ]s of the late ] and early ], including the ]. In the ], many new ]s were anarchists; an especially notable group was the large number of ]ish immigrants who had left ] and ] during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These groups were disrupted by the ]. ] was a very influential anarchist and feminist during this period. She traveled the country and the world spreading anarchist ideas and attempting to live an anarchist life. | |||
The ], at its founding, was an alliance of diverse socialist groups, including French Mutualists, English Owenites, and others. Over its short life it grew into a major movement, with local federations in many countries developing strong bases of working class activism. But at the same time the international began to polarise into two camps, with ] and ] as their respective figureheads. | |||
The anarcho-syndicalist orientation of many early American labor unions played a large part in the formation of the American ]. The United States is the only industrialized former British colony to not have a labor-based political party. In Mexico, anarcho-syndicalists like ] led various revolts and uprisings that would help overthrow the dictator Diaz, lead the way for the growth of anarchism in ], and also go on to influence the modern day ] rebellion. | |||
Both sides had a stated common aim (stateless communism), and common political opponents (the ]). But each was critical of the other, and the conflict between the two groups intensified. Perhaps the clearest differences emerged over proposed strategies for achieving their visions of socialism. The anarchists grouped around Bakunin favoured (in Kropotkin's words) "direct economical struggle against capitalism, without interfering in the political parliamentary agitation." Marxist thinking, at that time, focused on parliamentary activity. (Particularly when the new ] of 1871 became the first country to introduce manhood suffrage, leading many German socialists to focus their energies within the then Marxist ].) | |||
In ], in the first quarter of the 20th century, anarchist movements achieved relative, if short-lived, successes and were violently repressed by states. In the United States anarchist organisations were given a crushing blow during the "]" (1919-20). However, in the 1920s and 1930s the conflict between anarchism and the state was eclipsed by the one between ], ] and ], which ended with the defeat of the ] in ]. | |||
Bakunin characterised Marx's ideas as ], and predicted that if a Marxist party gained to power its leaders would end up as bad as the ] they had fought against (notably in his '']''.) In ], the conflict in the First International climaxed with the expulsion of Bakunin and those who had become known as the "Bakuninists" when they were outvoted by the Marxists at the ]. This is often cited as the origin of the long-running ]. From then on, the '']'' and '']'' currents of socialism had distinct organisations, at various points including rival ] | |||
In ], years of social, political and religious turmoil coupled with decades of anarchist ] and organisation led to class conflict. The old ] (church, army and monarchy) and capitalists were horrified by the new freedoms and social changes within the ]. So an army rebellion or ] was initiated so as to regain control of the country. The ] (1936-1939) as it became known, pitched the ruling class and fascists against the middle-class liberals and politicised workers. In reponse to the army rebellion ] peasant and workers movement (supported by militias initially tolerated by the republic) took control of huge areas of urban and rural Spain (including most major ]) in ]-] and ] the land. Along with the ], they were eventually suppressed by the Stalinist-controlled republican army, which later lost to ]'s army in ]. In the ] from ] and in Europe during the World War, thousands of anarchists were killed or sent to prisons and concentration camps. | |||
A surge of popular interest in anarchism occurred during the ] and ]. In the ] this was associated with the ] movement; the band ] is celebrated for its anarchist and ] ideas. In ], the ] was created in downtown ]. The housing and employment crisis in most of ] led to the formation of ] and squatter movements like the one still thriving in ], in ]. Militant ] in places like Germany, and the uprisings of ], ], and ] groups in France and Italy also helped to give popularity to anti-authoritarian, non-capitalist ideas. | |||
Unfortunately, many of the debates between the opposing camps became heated to the point of abusiveness. Bakunin did not restrain himself from hurling ] and ] slurs at Marx. | |||
Beginning in the later part of the 20th century anarchist ] like ] began to proclaim that ] — not just the state — would need to fall for anarchy to be achieved. A rejection of industrial ] is also prominent in the views of many ]. This worldview was associated with the growth of the anti-roads movement in the UK, ] and the ] in the US. | |||
===The theory of Anarchist Communism=== | |||
Through the ] anarchists were actively involved in the labour, animal-rights, radical ecological, feminist movements, and later in the fight against fascism. It should be noted that, in general, the anarchists participating in these movements opposed social hierarchy in general, and their activism came naturally out of this position. The influence of this on anarchist thought is apparent, as most of the traditional anarchist philosophies emphasize the economic implications of anarchism, or arrive at anarchism from economic arguments. Since the mid-], anarchists have been involved in student protest movements, ], squatter movements, and the ] movement, among others. | |||
''See also:'' ] | |||
===Anarchism today=== | |||
Unlike Marxism, anarchism has never had one central set of texts or authorities. But in the last three decades of the nineteenth century the anarchism of many of Bakunin's followers did gradually develop into a clearer position embracing an idea of communism. | |||
North American anarchism takes a strong influences from the ] and the movement against the ]. European anarchism has developed out of the labour movement, and both have incorporated ] and environmental ] from a ] approach which gave growth to the anti-roads movement, and ]. Globally, anarchism has been associated with the ], ], and ] movements. Since the late 1990s, anarchists have been known for their involvement in ]s against ] and ] meetings, and the ] -- protests that are generally portrayed in mainstream media coverage as violent riots. Some anarchists advocate the formation of '']s'' at protests, in which participants of the bloc wear black and cover their faces to avoid police identification and to create one large solid mass. Bloc participants confront the ], set up barricades, and sometimes engage in the destruction of corporate property. | |||
] | |||
Although black bloc anarchists are often the anarchists high-lighted by the ] at large protests, large-scale protests are often constructed and organised through non-hierarchical structures. Affinity groupings, spokescouncils, and networking all have led to the success of various large-scale anti-war and anti-globalization mobilizations, most notably at the protests against the ] in ]. Anarchists have also been involved heavily with underground direct action movements such as the Animal Liberation Front, and the Earth Liberation Front, which are considered "]" by federal authorities and some liberal organizations. Anarchism (or at least non-hierarchical systems of organizing) is now largely seen to have about the same sway in modern revolutionary movements as Marxism had in the 1960's. | |||
The Italian federation of the ], which overwhelmingly took the Bakuninist line, was the first organisation to set out an explicit vision of communist anarchism. The Italian anarchists included ], ], ] and other ex-] Republicans. At its Florence Conference of 1876, their federation stated its principles as follows: | |||
However, anarchism is not constrained to political protest. Many anarchists also work with others to build parallel structures and organizations, such as communes, ], infoshops and radical social centers, ], radical labor unions, new education methods, and do-it-yourself media in various forms. They also emphasise equality and "horizontal" organizing within the movement, using such tools as ] decision-making. This is in line with how anarchists interpret the idea of "dual-power", creating the new anti-authoritarian society "in the shell of the old", hierarchical one. | |||
:''"The Italian Federation considers the collective property of the products of labour as the necessary complement to the collectivist programme, the aid of all for the satisfaction of the needs of each being the only rule of production and consumption which corresponds to the principle of solidarity."'' | |||
Some have said that recent technological developments have made the anarchist cause both easier to advance and more conceivable to people. ] and the ] have made anonymous digital currencies such as e-gold an alternative to statist ]. Many people use ]s or the Internet to form loose communities that could be said to be organized along anarchist lines. Some of these communities have as their purpose the production of information in a non-commodified or ] format, a goal made attainable by the availability of ], ], and ]. These things have made it possible for individuals to ] over the Internet. There are also ] programming communities, who donate their time and offer their product for free. Examples include ], the ] (including the ]/] community and the ] paradigm), and ]. | |||
In his ''Anarchie et Communisme'', Cafiero argued that private property even in the product of labor (Mutualist 'possession') will lead to unequal accumulation of capital, and therefore to class distinctions. | |||
Most of these modern efforts mentioned above have been undertaken by anarchists who maintain an opposition to social hierarchy in general. For examples of major groupings of anarchist collectives and groups throughout the world, see the list of Anarchist organizations at the end of this article. | |||
Anarchist communists advocate an egalitarian society without markets or wages, based on the principle of "from each according to their ability, to each according to need." Decisions would be made through ] and assemblies. There would be direct ] of production, and self-management of community instutions. Communities, groups and workplaces would be connected together through ]s and ]s created by ] and popular affinity. | |||
===Historical and contemporary examples=== | |||
Perhaps the most important theorist of ] was ]. In a number of works including '']'' and '']'', Kropotkin plotted his views of what anarchist communist society might look like and how it might be achieved. Kropotkin's ] was closely linked to his ] theory based on ] in which co-operation equaled or surpassed competition in importance, as illustrated in '']'' (]). | |||
There are various examples of societies which have been organized by anarchist principles, ranging from the Thing system of classical Iceland to pirate cities. | |||
Subsequent figures in the theory of anarchist communism include ] and ]. The ] movements (see below) generally saw anarchist communism as their objective. ]'s 1932 ''Comunismo Libertario'' was adopted by the Spanish ] as its manifesto for an anarchist communist society. Most recently, groups like ] (North Eastern Federation of Anarcho-Communists), have advocated various forms of anarchist communism. | |||
: See ] | |||
Historically, anarchist communism is believed to have been put into practice by millions of people in the anarchist collectives and communes of the anarchist-controlled region of ] during the Russian Revolution, and during the ] in the ] and ] regions of Spain. | |||
==Anarchist schools of thought== | |||
Anarchist communists today are involved in various broad labor and community issues; generally revolving around housing, labor struggles/strikes, anti-racism, and building the anarchist movement. Anarchist communists have generally called for more cohesive groups and structures of anarchist groups and thereby garnered criticism from other anarchist sects. Various large-scale groups of anarchist communists exist today with the larger groups existing throughout various countries. | |||
From ]'s utilitarian anarchism to ]'s ], to ]'s ], to ]'s ], to ]'s ], the roots of anarchist thought in modern political philosophy are varied, with many different views of what a society without government should be like. A listing in chronological order of inception follows: | |||
=== |
===Individualism=== | ||
{{see details|Individualist anarchism}} | |||
''See also:'' ], ], ], ] | |||
]]] | ]]] | ||
Individualists, taking much from the writings of ], among others, demanded the utmost respect for the ] of the individual. While some individualists looked to ] to justify individualism, Stirner's "Egoism" held that ] is the only legitimate justification for action. While its roots include William Godwin, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, and Max Stirner, it is most often associated with the ], which advocates private possession (individual ownership of the "full produce" of one's labor) and a ] where this property may be bought and sold. | |||
Individualist anarchism is a philosophical tradition that opposes ] and has a particularly strong emphasis on the supremacy and autonomy of the individual. While individualist anarchists include Europeans such as ], ], and ], the term is most often used in association with the ], which advocates private property (individual ownership of the "full produce" of one's labor) and a competitive ] where this property and labor may be bought and sold (therefore opposing communism). They espouse a ], and, as a result, they regard profit (and hence, capitalism insofar as it allows that) as being exploitative; they believe profit is only made possible by reduced competition due to government regulations on banking and currency issuance, as well as by protection of vacant land. Wage labor is supported as long as wages adhere to the labor theory of value, hence, traditional individualists tend to advocate, and practice, an economic system called '']'' as an alternative to capitalism and communism. Traditional individualists do not oppose the private ownership of capital, with an important exception: Most oppose property titles to unused land since it is not the product of labor and therefore oppose its purchase and sale; however, individuals may possess land by occupation or use and must continue using it to retain title to it. Unused land is not considered to be collective property of the community --is simply unowned and therefore no permission is needed from the community to put it to private use and no compensation is due to them. Individualism contrasts with collectivist forms of anarchism (anarcho-communism and anarcho-syndicalism), and the relationships between these groups of been characterized by varying degrees of antagonism and harmony throughout their history. As a testament to the liberal character of American individualist anarchism, the most famous individualist, Benjamin Tucker, refers to his philosophy as "unterrified Jeffersonianism." To protect individual liberty and private property, individualists tend to advocate "private police" and private courts. | |||
In the United States, anarchist thoughts were expressed in the writings of Josiah Warren, Benjamin Tucker, and Lysander Spooner. They espouse a ], and, as a result, they regard profit (and thus capitalism), as being exploitative. Wage labor is supported as long as wages adhere to the labor theory of value, hence, traditional individualists tend to advocate, and practice, an economic system called '']'' as an alternative to capitalism and communism. The major tenets of mutualism are free association, mutualist credit, contract (or federation), and gradualism (or dual-power). Individualists oppose property titles to unused land, arguing that land must be possessed to be legitimate property. Individualism contrasts with collectivist forms of anarchism (anarcho-communism and anarcho-syndicalism), and the relationships between these groups of been characterized by varying degrees of antagonism and harmony throughout their history. | |||
Notable figures that assist in comprising the American tradition include ], Benjamin Tucker, Lysander Spooner, and Ezra Heywood. Many also consider Henry David Thoreau as an individualist anarchist due to his position that individuals should not be governed and his belief that all should be free to withdraw themselves from "any incorporated body." Noteworthy anarchist writer and poet John Henry Mackay is also considered an individualist anarchist. Contemporary individualist anarchists include ], ], ], ], ], and ]. ], an ], also labels herself an individualist anarchist, albeit not a classical one. Italian anarcho-capitalist Guglielmo Piombini also regards his philosophy as individualist anarchism. | |||
Many also consider Henry David Thoreau as an individualist anarchist due to his position that individuals should not be governed and his belief that all should be free to withdraw themselves from "any incorporated body." Noteworthy anarchist writer and poet John Henry Mackay is also considered an individualist anarchist. Contemporary individualist anarchists include ], and Joe Peacott. | |||
===Anarcho-communism=== | |||
] | |||
{{see details|Anarcho-communism}} | |||
===Propaganda by the deed=== | |||
Anarcho-communism shares many things in common with anarcho-syndicalism but generally rejects private property in favor of collectivizing the means of production and products of labor. The Florence Conference of the Federation of the International, formulated by ], ], ] and other ex-] Republicans, in laying out the principles of anarcho-communism states: "''Italian Federation of the International considers the collective property of the products of labour as the necessary complement to the collectivist programme...''" Cafiero notes, in Anarchie et Communisme, that private property in the product of labor will lead to unequal accumulation of capital, and therefore undesirable class distinctions. Anarcho-communism developed as a rejection of the individualist anarchism of ]; ] wrote to Proudhon criticizing him for his support of private ownership of the product of labor and a market economy: "it is not the product of his or her labor that the worker has a right to, but to the satisfaction of his or her needs, whatever may be their nature." Anarcho-communists advocate an egalitarian society without markets or wages, and instead, propose collectives based on direct worker control, ], self-management over community institutions, and mutual aid based upon the idea of "from each according to their ability, to each according to need." Anarcho-communists also propose large- and small-scale connections of communities, groups, and workplaces through ]s and ]s created by ] and popular affinity. Anarcho-communists want direct worker control over production, and have decisions made through ] and assemblies. Communities would be organized through systems of direct democracy, and through various organizations and collectives to carry out various tasks. | |||
Anarchists have often been portrayed as dangerous and violent, due mainly to a number of high-profile violent acts including ]s, ]s, and ]s involving anarchists. Some ]aries of the late 19th century encouraged acts of political violence, such as ]ings and the ]s of ] to further anarchism. Such actions have sometimes been called ']'. | |||
], ], ], and most recently, groups like ] (North Eastern Federation of Anarcho-Communists), have advocated various forms of anarcho-communism. ] and ] tried to overcome the differences between Marxism and anarchism. Historically, anarcho-communism is believed to have been put into practice by millions of people in the anarchist collectives and communes of the anarchist-controlled region of ] during the Russian Revolution, and during the ] in the ] and ] regions of Spain. | |||
Between 1894 and 1901, individual anarchists assassinated numerous heads of state. For example, US President McKinley's assassin, ], claimed to be a disciple of ] - although Goldman disavowed any association with him. Because ] arose during this time period with the widespread distribution of dynamite, bombings were associated with anarchists, an image that remains to this day. Depictions in the press and popular fiction helped create a lasting public impression that anarchists are violent terrorists. This perception was enhanced by events such as the ], where anarchists were blamed for throwing a bomb at police who came to break up a public meeting in ]. | |||
Anarcho-communists are split generally on the ], or the "Organizational Platform of Libertarian Communists", written by ] anarchist militant, ]. The Platform calls for anarchist organisations based on "Theoretical Unity, Tactical Unity, Collective Action and Discipline, and Federalism", and has been accepted by some anarchists and scorned by others. | |||
The use of ] and ], however, is condemned by most anarchists. Even anarchists who see acts of violence as justified in a context of ] and ] would often view individual acts of terrorism as ineffective and counter-productive. | |||
Anarcho-communists today are involved in various broad labor and community issues; generally revolving around housing, labor struggles/strikes, anti-racism, and building the anarchist movement. Anarcho-communists have generally called for more cohesive groups and structures of anarchist groups and thereby garnered criticism from other anarchist sects. Various large-scale groups of anarcho-communists exist today with the larger groups existing throughout various countries. | |||
However there is no ] on the legitimacy or utility of violence as such in the furtherance of anarchism. ] and ] saw violence as a necessary and sometimes desirable force. Malatesta took the view that it is "necessary to destroy with violence, since one cannot do otherwise, the violence which denies to the workers" ('']'', number 125, September 6, 1921). | |||
Traditional ]s, have denied that anarcho-communism is a form of anarchism. ] has referred to it as "pseudo-anarchism." | |||
Other anarchists share ]'s ] belief in ]. These ] advocate ] as the only method of achieving a truly anarchist revolution. They often see violence as the basis of government and coercion and argue that, as such, violence is illegitimate, no matter who is the target. Some of Proudhon's ] followers even saw ] as coercive and refused to take part in such traditional socialist tactics. | |||
===Anarcho-syndicalism=== | |||
{{see details|Anarcho-syndicalism}} | |||
] | |||
Many anarchists would make a distinction between "violence" and "property destruction": they claim that violence is when a person inflicts harm to another person, while property destruction or property damage is not violence, although it can have indirect harm such as financial harm. | |||
Anarcho-syndicalism is the anarchist wing of the ] movement. Its primary aim is the end of the wage system and the abolition of private property, both of which are believed to lead to class divisions. It is not so much a separate "school of thought" within anarchism as it is a particular focus within the wider anarchist movement (on industrial action and anarchist unionism). It is generally regarded as being compatible with all other forms of anti-capitalist anarchism. Anarcho-syndicalism functions on principles of workers solidarity, ], and self-management. | |||
===Anarchism at work=== | |||
Workers solidarity is the belief that all workers -- no matter what ], ], or ] -- are in a similar situation vis-à-vis their bosses. Furthermore, within capitalism, any gains or losses made by some workers in their relation to bosses will eventually impact all workers. Therefore, in order to gain liberation, all workers must support one another in their ]. | |||
''See also:'' ] | |||
Anarcho-syndicalists only believe in direct action — that is, action directly designed to confront a problem. Direct action can range from traditional ] to active ]. | |||
] | |||
Furthermore, anarcho-syndicalists believe that workers' organizations — the organizations struggling against the wage system who, in anarcho-syndicalist theory, will eventually form the basis of a new society – should be self-managing. They should not have bosses or "business agents"; rather, the workers should be able to make decisions that affect them amongst themselves. | |||
In the late 19th century, ] developed as a movement pursuing ]s, especially the ], as the primary strategy to achieve anarchist revolution, and "build the new society in the shell of the old". Most anarcho-syndicalists shared a belief in ] as the best form of the future society, although not all anarchist communists agreed with syndicalism. | |||
The ] is an international anarcho-syndicalist federation of various labor unions from different countries. The ], a once-powerful, still active, and again growing labor union, is considered a leading organ of the anarcho-syndicalist program in the United States. The Spanish ] played a major role in the ], and today it is the third biggest union in Spain. Other major anarcho-syndicalist organizations include the ], and the ] in the UK. | |||
According to the preamble to the constitution of the US-based ] (also called ''IWW'' or ''Wobblies'') syndicalist union: | |||
] critics of anarcho-syndicalism oppose the strategy of unions, believing them to feed into the concept of capitalism and because they are hierarchically organized. Also, some contend that its focus on proletarian ] overlooks the needs of segments of society such as parents or others occupied with child-rearing or domestic labor, although some anarcho-syndicalist thought attempts to address other sectors of economic life. Post-left anarchist thinkers, notably ], contend that an anarcho-syndicalist revolution would leave in place social systems they find oppressive (] and workplaces, for example), although anarcho-syndicalists contend that worker self-management would render those systems fundamentally more humane. At issue also is the willingness of various anarcho-syndicalists groups to collaborate with government in their activities. | |||
::''It is the historic mission of the working class to do away with capitalism. The army of production must be organized, not only for everyday struggle with capitalists, but also to carry on production when capitalism shall have been overthrown. By organizing industrially we are forming the structure of the new society within the shell of the old.'' | |||
Anarcho-syndicalism formed a new wave of anarchism in beginning in the 1890's and 1900's. Even more than the anarchism of the International, this was anarchism brought out of the philosophy books and embodied in the ongoing struggle of millions of working class people. | |||
Some, generally primitivsts, hold that anarcho-syndicalism is not a form of anarchism and attack it as a purely workerist ideology. For example, Feral Faun argues in "The Bourgeois Roots of Anarcho-Syndicalism" that anarcho-syndicalism is actually a non-anarchist form of liberalism that, by default, supports capitalism. | |||
After the fall of the Paris Commune in 1871 French anarchists and socialists had suffered a dark period of repression similar to the aftermath of the 1848 revolution. Anarchism began to resurface in the 1880's and 1890's, and was a particular influence upon the ''Bourses de Travails'' of autonomous workers groups and trade unions. It was from this ground that the ] trade union confederation, founded in 1895, was born. The CGT was the first major anarcho-syndicalist movement. | |||
=== Anarcho-capitalism === | |||
{{see details|Anarcho-capitalism}} | |||
CGT members ] and ] wrote the classic syndicalist text in 1909. The fictionalised ''How we will bring about the revolution'' (''Comment nous ferons la revolution'') tells the story of the birth of liberarian communism in a French general strike. However the CGT soon veered away from anarchism, and after the ] fell into the Communist camp. (The CGT is still an important French trade union, though now thoroughly reformist in sympathy.) | |||
''Anarcho-capitalism'' envisions a stateless society where private ownership of the means of production is supported, and economic decisions are made privately through the operation of a ]. Like most modern economists, anarcho-capitalists espouse a ] rather than a ]; therefore, they have no opposition to ]. Anarcho-capitalism is an anti-state form of liberalism derived from 19th century American individualist anarchism, abolitionism, and classical economics. Anarcho-capitalists, like all other anarchists, oppose traditional capitalism, state capitalism, and mercantilism. | |||
In Chicago in June 1905, a convention of two hundred socialists, anarchists, and radical trade unionists from all over the United States founded the ]. At its peak in 1923 the organization claimed some 100,000 members in good standing, and could marshall the support of perhaps 300,000 workers. | |||
Much of the credit for the foundations of anarcho-capitalist theory goes to ] who formally synthesized ] with ]. Other important anarcho-capitalists include ], ], ], and ]. Some ], such as ], ], and ], have also contributed to the theory and popularity of anarcho-capitalism. | |||
Anarchism had been introduced into Spain by followers of Bakunin in the late 1860's, and quickly established itself as the dominant force within the Spanish socialist and working class movements. (See also - ].) Spanish anarchist trade union federations were formed in the 1870's and in 1900. But the most famous and most successful was the ] founded in 1910. The CNT was to become the major force in Spanish working class politics - it had a membership of 1.58 million in 1934. The CNT played a major role in the ] (see below). | |||
Anarchists who oppose private ownership of capital tend to deny that anarcho-capitalism is a form of anarchism, arguing that hierarchical institutions are inevitable in any capitalist system. On the other hand, there are contemporary ] that do regard it as a form of anarchism. Moreoever, anarcho-capitalists Wendy McElroy and Guglielmo Piombini regard their philosophy as "individualist anarchism." Anarcho-capitalism is compared and contrasted with classical individualist anarchism in the article '']''. | |||
In Berlin in 1922 the CNT was amongst trade unions who joined together to form the ], an anarcho-syndicalist successor to the ]. | |||
Anarcho-syndicalist unions live on to this day, though with nothing like the strength they once enjoyed. The IWW is still active, with currently around 1000 members. After defeat in the | |||
See also ]. | |||
], CNT members were killed, imprisoned or forced into exile. Following the death of ], the CNT returned to Spain. Although disputes within the movement caused an acrimonious split shortly thereafter. Other current anarcho-syndicalist organizations include the ] in the US, and the ] in the UK. | |||
Whilst engaging in everyday workplace struggles, anarcho-syndicalist trade unions distance themselves from the methods of ''reformist'' trade unions which in their view merely seek short-term and compromising improvements. Anarcho-syndicalism upholds principles of workers solidarity, ], and self-management. | |||
==Issue and Movement Anarchisms== | |||
Workers solidarity is the belief that all workers -- no matter what ], ], or ] -- are in a similar situation vis-à-vis their bosses. Furthermore, within capitalism, any gains or losses made by some workers in their relation to bosses will eventually impact all workers. Therefore, in order to gain liberation, all workers must support one another in their ]. | |||
The philosophical schools above are often combines with pressing issues, such as environmentalism or feminism. Also, popular authors will sometimes coin a term to describe new interpretations (e.g. post-left anarchism and small-A anarchism) or combine anarchism with other special interests (e.g. crypto-anarchism and spiritual anarchism.) Some of these are outlined below. | |||
Anarcho-syndicalists believe in using direct action — that is, action directly designed to confront a problem. Direct action can range from traditional ] to active ]. | |||
'''Black anarchism''' | |||
{{see details|Black anarchism}} | |||
'''Black anarchism''' opposes the existence of a state and subjugation and domination of people of color, and favors a non-hierarchical organization of society. Black anarchists seeks to abolish ], capitalism, and the state. Theorists include ], ], and ]. | |||
Furthermore, anarcho-syndicalists believe that workers' organizations — the organizations struggling against the wage system who, in anarcho-syndicalist theory, will eventually form the basis of a new society – should be self-managing. They should not have bosses or "business agents"; rather, the workers should be able to make decisions that affect them amongst themselves. | |||
'''Ecological anarchism''' | |||
{{see details|Green anarchism}} | |||
Some critics of anarcho-syndicalism contend that its focus on proletarian ] overlooks the needs of segments of society such as parents or others occupied with child-rearing or domestic labor, although some anarcho-syndicalist thought attempts to address other sectors of economic life. Some primitivist authors, notably ], contend that an anarcho-syndicalist revolution would leave in place social systems they find oppressive (] and workplaces, for example), although anarcho-syndicalists contend that worker self-management would render those systems fundamentally more humane. | |||
''Ecological anarchism'' (also known as ''eco-anarchism'' or ''green anarchism'') generally is a belief in ], ] against earth destroying institutions and systems, and generally a critique of industrial capitalism, although generally not against ] per se. | |||
The anarcho-syndicalist orientation of many early American labor unions played a large part in the formation of the American ]. The United States is the only industrialized former British colony to not have a labor-based political party. In Mexico, anarcho-syndicalists like ] led various revolts and uprisings that would help overthrow the dictator Diaz, lead the way for the growth of anarchism in ], and also go on to influence the modern day ] rebellion. | |||
There is a significant ] element to the ], including those that are known as ] and ]. Eco-anarchism is generally a broad term that broadly refers to anarchists engaged in the earth liberation movement. The largest segment of 'eco-anarchists' is the ] movement, a network of various collectives formed along anarchist principles. Earth First! generally engages in ] and eco-defense, such as tree sitting and 'locking down'. In the modern anarchist movement, eco-anarchists generally adhere to ], which is a worldview that embraces biodiversity and sustainability. ] is also sometimes considered the form of eco-anarchist feminism. | |||
====Insurrectionary Anarchism==== | |||
'''Anarcho-primitivism''' | |||
Insurrectionary anarchism is critical of formal anarchist labor unions and federations. Instead, insurrectionary anarchists advocate informal organization, including small affinity groups, carrying out acts of resistance in various struggles, and mass organizations called base structures, which can include exploited individuals who are not anarchists. Here, ] writes some of the basis points of its praxis. | |||
{{see details|Anarcho-primitivism}} | |||
<blockquote> | |||
Anarcho-primitivism is an anarchist critique of industrial ], and of the ] that ], ], etc., have created between people and the natural world. Primitivists generally associate oppressive structures of hierarchy with the rise of agriculture, specialization of tasks or ], the production of surplus and the first city-states. Anarcho-primitivists point to the anti-authoritarian nature of many 'primitive' or hunter-gatherer societies throughout the world's history, as examples of anarchist societies, but do not generally make them a "blueprint" for the future. | |||
Insurrectionary anarchism is not an ideological solution to all social problems, a commodity on the capitalist market of ideologies and opinions, but an on-going praxis aimed at putting an end to the domination of the state and the continuance of capitalism, which requires analysis and discussion to advance. We don’t look to some ideal society or offer an image of utopia for public consumption. Throughout history, most anarchists, except those who believed that society would evolve to the point that it would leave the state behind, have been insurrectionary anarchists. Most simply, this means that the state will not merely wither away, thus anarchists must attack, for waiting is defeat; what is needed is open mutiny and the spreading of subversion among the exploited and excluded. Here we spell out some implications that we and some other insurrectionary anarchists draw from this general problem: if the state will not disappear on its own, how then do we end its existence? It is, therefore, primarily a practice, and focuses on the organization of attack...The State of capital will not “wither away,” attack is the refusal of mediation, pacification, sacrifice, accommodation, and compromise. | |||
</blockquote> | |||
], an Italian insurrectionary anarchist also had a great impact on this specific tendency, writing such works as "Armed Joy," "The Anarchist Tension," and others. In the US, ], ], and other magazines caused interest in insurrectionary anarchism to grow. | |||
The primitivist tendency has connections to environmental movements such as ] and the ]. Writers often associated with the current are ], ] and ]. ] (the ]) and ] are well known ] whose ideas are associated with this school by some, and vigourously rejected by others. | |||
===Anarchism and feminism=== | |||
Some assert that anarcho-primitivism is not a form of anarchism. For example, Brian Oliver Sheppard, in ''Anarchism Vs. Primitivism'', says: "In recent decades, groups of quasi-religious mystics have begun equating the primitivism they advocate (rejection of science, rationality, and technology often lumped together under a blanket term "technology") with anarchism. In reality, the two have nothing to do with each other." | |||
] 1869-1940]] | |||
'''Anarcha-feminism''' | |||
] (1869-1940), an early inspiration for anarcha-feminism]] | |||
{{see details|Anarcha-feminism}} | |||
''See also:'' ] | |||
Anarcha-feminism is a kind of ] that espouses the belief that ] is a fundamental problem in some societies. Feminist anarchism, or anarcha-feminism (a term allegedly created during the 1960s' ]), views ] as the first manifestation of hierarchy in human history; thus, the first form of oppression occurred in the dominance of male over female. Anarcha-feminists then conclude that if feminists are against patriarchy, they must also be against all forms of ], and therefore must reject the authoritarian nature of the state and capitalism. | |||
Anarcha-feminism is a kind of ] that espouses the belief that ] is a fundamental problem in some societies. While anarchist feminism has existed for more than a hundred years, its explicit formulation as ''anarcha-feminism'' dates back to at least 1971, during the ] feminist movement. Anarcha-feminism, views ] as the first manifestation of hierarchy in human history; thus, the first form of oppression occurred in the dominance of male over female. Anarcha-feminists then conclude that if feminists are against patriarchy, they must also be against all forms of ], and therefore must reject the authoritarian nature of the state and capitalism. | |||
Anarcho-primitivists see the creation of gender roles and patriarchy a creation of the start of ], and therefore consider primitivism to also be an anarchist school of thought that addresses feminist concerns. ] is often considered a feminist variant of green anarchist feminist thought. | Anarcho-primitivists see the creation of gender roles and patriarchy a creation of the start of ], and therefore consider primitivism to also be an anarchist school of thought that addresses feminist concerns. ] is often considered a feminist variant of green anarchist feminist thought. | ||
Anarcha-feminism |
Anarcha-feminism is most often associated with early 20th-century authors and theorists such as ] and ], although even early first-wave feminist ] held proto-anarchist views. In the ], an anarcha-feminist group, "Free Women", organized to defend both anarchist and feminist ideas. | ||
In the modern day anarchist movement, many anarchists, male or female, consider themselves feminists, and anarcha-feminist ideas are growing. The publishing of Quiet Rumors, an anarcha-feminist reader, has helped to spread various kinds of anti-authoritarian and anarchist feminist ideas to the broader movement. | In the modern day anarchist movement, many anarchists, male or female, consider themselves feminists, and anarcha-feminist ideas are growing. The publishing of Quiet Rumors, an anarcha-feminist reader, has helped to spread various kinds of anti-authoritarian and anarchist feminist ideas to the broader movement. | ||
===Religion=== | |||
'''Christian anarchism''' | |||
''See also:'' ], ] | |||
]]] | |||
] 1828-1910]] | |||
{{see details|Christian anarchism}} | |||
Christian anarchism is the belief that there is only one source of authority to which ] are ultimately answerable, the authority of ] as embodied in the teachings of ]. Christian anarchists therefore feel that earthly authority such as ], or indeed the established church do not and should not have power over them. Christian anarchists are ] and oppose the use of all physical force, both proactive and reactive. | |||
''Christian anarchism'' is the belief that there is only one source of authority to which ] are ultimately answerable, the authority of ] as embodied in the teachings of ]. Christian anarchists therefore feel that earthly authority such as ], or indeed the established church do not and should not have power over them. Christian anarchists are ] and oppose the use of all physical force, both proactive and reactive. Christian anarchists advocate ] ] to oppose war, state aggression and imperialism. Many Christian anarchists oppose profiting from economic transactions and state capitalism. | |||
Christian anarchists believe that freedom from earthly authority will only be guided by the grace of ] if individuals display compassion for others and ] when confronted by violence. Its adherents believe this quest for freedom is justified spiritually and quote the teachings of Jesus, some of whom are critical of the existing ] and church. They believe all individuals can directly communicate with God and will eventually unify in peace under this one God. | Christian anarchists believe that freedom from earthly authority will only be guided by the grace of ] if individuals display compassion for others and ] when confronted by violence. Its adherents believe this quest for freedom is justified spiritually and quote the teachings of Jesus, some of whom are critical of the existing ] and church. They believe all individuals can directly communicate with God and will eventually unify in peace under this one God. | ||
Line 180: | Line 186: | ||
The most famous advocate of Christian anarchism was ], author of '']'', who called for a society based on compassion, nonviolent principles and freedom. | The most famous advocate of Christian anarchism was ], author of '']'', who called for a society based on compassion, nonviolent principles and freedom. | ||
Some Christian anarchists oppose war and other statist aggression through ], while others submit to taxation. ] advocated tax resistance, while Tolstoy opposed it. Tolstoy claimed that the act of resisting taxes requires physical force to withold what a government tries to take. Contrary to this Hennacy, who like Tolstoy also believed in ], managed to resist taxes without resorting to physical force. Many Christian anarchists are ] or ]. | |||
'''Insurrectionary anarchism''' | |||
Spiritual Anarchism, or Divine Anarchy, was originally expressed by the political revolutionary, poet and yogi ] during the ] in a series of articles published in the Arya, and later made available in two books, The Human Cycle and The Ideal of Human Unity. The exaggerations of both individualistic and communistic streams of anarchist thought are harmonized by going beyond the vital and intellectual foundations of most other schools of anarchism and rooting itself firmly in the spiritual realization and dynamic perfection of the individual and universal godhead in the race. | |||
''Insurrectionary anarchism'' is critical of formal anarchist labor unions and federations. Instead, insurrectionary anarchists advocate informal organization, including small affinity groups, carrying out acts of resistance in various struggles, and mass organizations called base structures, which can include exploited individuals who are not anarchists. Here, ] writes some of the basis points of its praxis. | |||
A spiritual anarchist holds that a perfect form of social organization can only be achieved by governing our individual and collective life by a higher light than the intellectual reason, a deeper law of solidarity and oneness than emotional or mental bonds of association. | |||
<blockquote> | |||
Insurrectionary anarchism is not an ideological solution to all social problems, a commodity on the capitalist market of ideologies and opinions, but an on-going praxis aimed at putting an end to the domination of the state and the continuance of capitalism, which requires analysis and discussion to advance. We don’t look to some ideal society or offer an image of utopia for public consumption. Throughout history, most anarchists, except those who believed that society would evolve to the point that it would leave the state behind, have been insurrectionary anarchists. Most simply, this means that the state will not merely wither away, thus anarchists must attack, for waiting is defeat; what is needed is open mutiny and the spreading of subversion among the exploited and excluded. Here we spell out some implications that we and some other insurrectionary anarchists draw from this general problem: if the state will not disappear on its own, how then do we end its existence? It is, therefore, primarily a practice, and focuses on the organization of attack...The State of capital will not “wither away,” attack is the refusal of mediation, pacification, sacrifice, accommodation, and compromise. | |||
</blockquote> | |||
Although it has deviated significantly from its course, the international township of ] was originally intended to be organized as a Divine Anarchy, and may well one day fulfill its purpose. | |||
], an Italian insurrectionary anarchist also had a great impact on this specific tendency, writing such works as "Armed Joy," "The Anarchist Tension," and others. In the US, Willful Disobedience, Killing King Abacus, and other magazines caused interest in insurrectionary anarchism to grow. Although insurrectionary anarchists are generally interested in class struggle anarchism, in the US, many insurrectionary anarchists consider themselves to be ], or green anarchists, as well. | |||
===The Russian Revolution=== | |||
'''Post-anarchism''' | |||
{{see details|Post-anarchism}} | |||
The ] was a seismic event in the development of anarchism as a movement and as a philosophy. | |||
The term ''post-anarchism'' was originated by Saul Newman in his book "From Bakunin to Lacan: Antiauthoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power" to refer to a theoretical move towards a synthesis of classical anarchist theory and ] thought. In this sense it has similarities with post-Marxism associated with ] and Chantal Mouffee. Subsequent to Newman's use of the term, however, it has taken on a life of its own and a wide range of ideas including ], ], ], ] and Zapatismo have been suggested for inclusion under the rubric. Others have argued that the term "poststructuralist anarchism" is preferable in order to maintain an unbroken link with the anarchist heritage. | |||
Anarchists participated alongside the ] in both February and October revolutions, many anarchists initially supporting the Bolshevik coup. However the Bolsheviks soon turned against the anarchists and other left-wing opposition, a conflict which culminated in the 1918 ]. Anarchists in central Russia were imprisoned or driven underground, or joined the victorious Bolsheviks. In ] anarchists fought in the ] against both Whites and Bolsheviks within the Makhnovshchina peasant army led by ]). | |||
By its very nature post-anarchism rejects the idea that it should be a coherent set of doctrines and beliefs. As such it is difficult, if not impossible, to state with any degree of certainty who should or shouldn't be grouped under the rubric. Nonetheless key thinkers associated with post-anarchism include ], ], ] and ]. | |||
Expelled American anarchists ] and ] before leaving Russia were amongst those agitating in response to Bolshevik policy and the suppression of the Kronstadt uprising. Both wrote classic accounts of their experiences in Russia, aiming to expose the reality of Bolshevik control. For them, ]'s predictions about the consequences of Marxist rule had proved all too true. | |||
The is probably the best place to start for anyone wanting to find out more. | |||
The victory of the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution and the resulting Russian Civil War did serious damage to anarchist movements internationally. Many workers and activists saw Bolshevik success as setting an example; Communist parties grew at the expense of anarchism and other socialist movements. In France and the US for example, the major syndicalist movements of the ] and ] began to realign themselves away from anarchism and towards the ]. | |||
'''Post-left anarchy''' | |||
{{see details|Post-left anarchy}} | |||
In Paris, a group of Russian anarchist exiles around ] concluded that anarchists needed to develop new forms of organisation in response to the strutures of Bolshevism. Their manifesto known as the ], or the "Organizational Platform of Libertarian Communists", was supported by some Anarchist Communists, but opposed by many others. | |||
''Post-left anarchy'' (anarchy often used instead of "anarchism" to avoid the connotations of doctrine that the ''-ism'' suffix brings) is a more recent current in anarchist thought that seeks to distance itself from the traditional "left" - communists, liberals, social democrats, etc. - and to escape the confines of ] in general. It has rapidly developed since the fall of the ], which many view as the death of authoritarian leftism. It is not an independent "movement" as such but rather a critical way of thinking about anarchist ideas. | |||
===The fight against fascism=== | |||
Post-leftists argue that anarchism has been weakened by its long attachment to contrary "leftist" movements and single issue causes (], ], etc.). It calls for a synthesis of anarchist thought and a specifically anti-authoritarian revolutionary movement outside of the leftist milieu. It often focuses on the individual rather than speaking in terms of class or other broad generalizations and shuns organizational tendencies. Total individual liberation is a key focus, rather than merely economic liberation. | |||
In the 1920s and 1930s the familiar dynamics of anarchism's conflict with the state were transformed by the rise of ] in Europe. In many cases, European anarchists faced difficult choices - should they join in ]s with reformist democrats and Soviet-led ] against a common fascist enemy? | |||
Important groups and individuals associated with Post-left anarchy include: ], the magazine ] and its editor ], ], and others. For more information, see Infoshop.org's section, and the on | |||
Luigi Fabbri, an exile from Italian fascism, was amongst those arguing that fascism was something different: | |||
'''Small 'a' anarchism''' | |||
''Fascism is not just another form of government which, like all others, uses violence. It is the most authoritarian and the most violent form of government imaginable. It represents the utmost glorification of the theory and practice of the principle of authority.'' | |||
The term "small 'a' anarchism" has been used in two different, but not unconnected contexts. | |||
In France, where the fascists came close to insurrection in the February 1934 riots, anarchists divided over a 'united front' policy. (see David Berry, ‘Fascism or Revolution!’ Anarchism and Antifascism in France, 1933-39*) | |||
Dave Neal posited the term in opposition to big 'A' Anarchism in the article . While big 'A' Anarchism referred to ideological Anarchists, small 'a' anarchism was applied to their methodological counterparts; those who viewed anarchism as "a way of acting, or a historical tendency against illegitimate authority." As an anti-ideological position, small 'a' anarchism shares some similarities with ], while Neal's insistence that it entails a rejection of the idea that there can be an "ultimate Truth" recalls the poststructuralist turns of post-anarchism (see above). | |||
] | |||
In Spain, the ] initially refused to join a popular front electoral alliance, and abstention by CNT supporters led to a right wing election victory. But in 1936, the CNT changed its policy and anarchist votes helped bring the popular front back to power. Months later, the right responded with an attempted coup, and the ] was underway. | |||
David Graeber and Andrej Grubacic offer an alternative use of the term, applying it to groups and movements organising according to or acting in a manner consistent with anarchist principles of decentralisation, voluntary association, mutual aid, the network model, and crucially, "the rejection of any idea that the end justifies the means, let alone that the business of a revolutionary is to seize state power and then begin imposing one's vision at the point of a gun." Graeber and Grubacic do not offer a comprehensive list of groups within this rubric, but suggest that it includes the likes of autonomism, Zapatismo and radical democracy. It should be stressed that many of these groups do not describe themselves as "anarchist", perhaps deliberately, and are grouped instead on the basis of what they do, implying that the criteria for inclusion are similar to those articulated by Neal. | |||
In the history of anarchism the ] of (1936-1939) is a defining event on at least the scale of the ] or the ]. ] supported by anti-fascist militias took control of the industrial stronghold of ], and rural areas mainly in northeast Spain where they ] the land. For a few brief months in 1936-37 libertarian communism was being put into practice. | |||
It is unclear how far the term has been picked up by the wider anarchist movement, but it does help to clarify and begin to explain some of the conflicts and disagreements within contemporary anarchism. | |||
But even before the eventual fascist victory, the anarchists were losing ground in a bitter struggle with the Soviet-backed communists. Whilst the CNT leadership often appeared confused and divided, Communist-led troops suppressed the collectives, and the revolution was destroyed. Anarchism has never since come so close to realising the dream of libertarian communism as in that ''short summer of anarchy''. | |||
'''Crypto-anarchism''' | |||
{{see details|Crypto-anarchism}} | |||
==Contemporary anarchism== | |||
''Crypto-anarchism'' is a ] that expounds the use of strong ] ] to enforce ] and therefore individual ]. Crypto-anarchists aim to create virtual communities where everyone is absolutely ] or ]. | |||
===Punk rock=== | |||
'''Technological anarchism''' | |||
A surge of popular interest in anarchism occurred during the ] and ]. In the ] this was associated with the ] movement; the band ] is celebrated for its anarchist and ] ideas. In ], the ] was created in downtown ]. The housing and employment crisis in most of ] led to the formation of ] and squatter movements like the one still thriving in ], in ]. Militant ] in places like Germany, and the uprisings of ], ], and ] groups in France and Italy also helped to give popularity to anti-authoritarian, non-capitalist ideas. | |||
''For further details, see ]'' | |||
Some anarchists see ] as the way to replace hierarchy, defeat monopoly, and prevent war, and support ] in particular as a way to do so. Some writers — particularly ], who has written quite extensively in the ] genre about ], a futuristic society which has disposed of government — have theorised that anarchism would be inevitable with the technological advances that would make ] and living in space plausible . The Electro-anarchy Collective poses a similar theory that technological power will naturally overthrow human government (although some question their anarchist credentials, claiming that technological governance is no less oppressive than human governance). | |||
===Environmentalism=== | |||
It has also been argued that the ] is an example of anarchic organization, this being an example not of hierarchical business, but of voluntary association for the production of a good. | |||
''See also'': ] | |||
Eco-anarchism generally is a belief in ], ] against earth destroying institutions and systems, and generally a critique of industrial capitalism, although generally not against ] per se. | |||
See also ] and ]. | |||
There is a significant ] element to the ], including those that are known as ] and ]. Eco-anarchism is generally a broad term that broadly refers to anarchists engaged in the earth liberation movement. The largest segment of 'eco-anarchists' is the ] movement, a network of various collectives formed along anarchist principles. Earth First! generally engages in ] and eco-defense, such as tree sitting and 'locking down'. In the modern anarchist movement, eco-anarchists generally adhere to ], which is a worldview that embraces biodiversity and sustainability. ] is also sometimes considered the form of eco-anarchist feminism. | |||
'''Utopian anarchism''' | |||
{{see details|Utopian anarchism}} | |||
===Civil rights=== | |||
A ''Utopian anarchist'' believes, primarily, that nothing is static, everything is relative, and constantly affecting everything else. However, purpose is important, as is progress of purpose, and progress towards fulfillment of purpose. A Utopian anarchist is always thinking of the end desire, and makes decisions through life keeping this context in mind. | |||
''See also'': ], ], ] | |||
<!-- (what about the 60's through 80's?) --> | |||
Much stress is put upon developing education and evolution. Through free association, a complex web of desires and goals will be strived for, each influencing and perhaps assisting one another in our paths. | |||
'''Anti-Racist Action''' is a loose federation of groups that focus on confronting (sometimes violently) racist agitators, such as the ] or ]s when they appear in public. | |||
'''Black anarchism''' opposes the existence of a state, capitalism, and subjugation and domination of people of color, and favors a non-hierarchical organization of society. Black anarchists, recognizing that anarchism has traditionally been European or white-based, seek to forge their own movement that represents their own identity and tailored to their own unique situation. Theorists include ], ], and ]. | |||
The system strives for perfection, through unified diversity. Any static system will have flaws, and flaws fester. If one brushes one's teeth the same way every day, what happens to the missed spot? | |||
'''Anarchist People of Color''' was created as a forum for non-caucasian anarchists to express their thoughts about racial issues within the anarchist movement, particularly within the United States. | |||
Some critics perceive a lack of safety in the absence of enforced moral judgment. One Utopian anarchist response would be to consider this an issue with ego and desire for personal power and appreciation. | |||
===Globalization of capitalism=== | |||
'''Spiritual Anarchism''' | |||
Globally, anarchism has also grown in popularity and influence as part of the ], ], and ] movements. Since the late 1990s, anarchists have been known for their involvement in ]s against ] and ] meetings, and the ] -- protests that are generally portrayed in mainstream media coverage as violent riots. Some anarchists form '']s'' at protests, in which members of the bloc wear black and cover their faces to avoid police identification and to create one large solid mass. Bloc members confront and defend other protesters from the ], set up barricades, and sometimes engage in the destruction of corporate property. | |||
''Spiritual Anarchism'', or Divine Anarchy, was originally expressed by the political revolutionary, poet and yogi ] during the ] in a series of articles published in the ''Arya'', and later made available in two books, ''The Human Cycle'' and ''The Ideal of Human Unity''. The exaggerations of both individualistic and communistic streams of anarchist thought are harmonized by going beyond the vital and intellectual foundations of most other schools of anarchism and rooting itself firmly in the spiritual realization and dynamic perfection of the individual and universal godhead in the race. | |||
Although black bloc anarchists are often the only visible anarchists at large protests, large-scale protests are often constructed and organized through anarchist structures. Affinity groupings, spokescouncils, and networking all have led to the success of various large-scale anti-war and anti-globalization mobilizations, most notably at the protests against the ] in ]. Anarchists have also been involved heavily with underground direct action movements such as the Animal Liberation Front, and the Earth Liberation Front, which are considered "]" by federal authorities and some liberal organizations. Anarchism (or at least anarchist systems of organizing) is now largely seen to have about the same sway in modern revolutionary movements as Marxism had in the 1960's. | |||
A spiritual anarchist holds that a perfect form of social organization can only be achieved by governing our individual and collective life by a higher light than the intellectual reason, a deeper law of solidarity and oneness than emotional or mental bonds of association. | |||
===The question of civilization=== | |||
<blockquote> | |||
It is a spiritual, an inner freedom that can alone create a perfect human order. It is a spiritual, a greater than the rational enlightenment that can alone illumine the vital nature of man and impose harmony on its self-seekings, antagonisms and discords. A deeper brotherhood, a yet unfound law of love is the only sure foundation possible for a perfect social evolution, no other can replace it. But this brotherhood and love will not proceed by the vital instincts or the reason where they can be met, baffled or deflected by opposite reasonings and other discordant instincts. Nor will it found itself in the natural heart of man where there are plenty of other passions to combat it. It is in the soul that it must find its roots; the love which is founded upon a deeper truth of our being, the brotherhood or, let us say,—for this is another feeling than any vital or mental sense of brotherhood, a calmer more durable motive-force,—the spiritual comradeship which is the expression of an inner realisation of oneness. For so only can egoism disappear and the true individualism of the unique godhead in each man found itself on the true communism of the equal godhead in the race; for the Spirit, the inmost Self, the universal Godhead in every being is that whose very nature of diverse oneness it is to realise the perfection of its individual life and nature in the existence of all, in the universal life and nature. ''—], The Human Cycle'' | |||
</blockquote> | |||
''See also:'' ] | |||
==Conceptions of an anarchist society== | |||
]]] | |||
Beginning in the later part of the 20th century anarchist ] wrote in ], and later, ] that ] — not just the state — would need to fall for anarchy to be achieved. A rejection of industrial ] is also prominent in the views of many ]. This worldview was associated with the growth of the anti-roads movement in the UK, ] and the ] in the US, and the actions of ] (aka the "Unabomber"). | |||
''Main article: ]'' | |||
Primitivism is a philosophy advocating a return to a pre-industrial and usually pre-agricultural society, and a critique of industrial civilization, and the alienation that technology, progress, etc, have created between people and the natural world. Primitivism believes that industrial society inevitably produces oppressive structures through specialization of tasks or ], and that ] has similar negative implications. Most forms of primitivism question ] itself. Primitivism generally sees that by the birth of agriculture, and the birth of cities and the creating of production surplus, gave rise to structures of hierarchy, and later statism. Anarcho-primitivists point to the anti-authoritarian nature of many 'primitive' or hunter-gatherer societies throughout the world's history, as examples of anarchist societies. | |||
Many political philosophers justify support of the state as a means of regulating violence, so that the destruction caused by human conflict is minimized and fair relationships are established. Anarchists argue that pursuit of these ends does not justify the establishment of a state, and in fact many argue that the state is incompatible with those goals. Anarchists argue that the state helps to create a ], and uses force and violence to expand and protect elite interests. Much effort has been dedicated to explaining how anarchist societies would handle criminality. | |||
The primitivist movement has connections to radical environmentalism movements such as the ] and ]. | |||
==Conflicts within anarchist thought== | |||
===Anarcho-capitalism=== | |||
===Private property vs. Collective ownership=== | |||
''See also'': ] | |||
The anarcho-communists and anarcho-syndicalists advocate the elimination of private property, while the individualist anarchists support it as being essential to liberty. Individualist anarchists support private ownership of the produce of labor, including any resulting means of production. Since unused land is not the produce of labor, most classical individualists anarchists, such as Benjamin Tucker, oppose its ownership, but also oppose collective ownership of land. Tucker believes the concept to be incoherent and incompatible with anarchism: "''That there is an entity known as the community which is the rightful owner of all land, Anarchists deny. I . . . maintain that the community is a non-entity, that it has no existence, and is simply a combination of individuals having no prerogatives beyond those of the individuals themselves.'' As they reject the notion of the community owning all land collectively, they assert that no permission is needed from the community to put it to private use and no compensation is due to them. The results of cultivating land are considered to be private property as it is the result of labor. | |||
Anarcho-capitalism envisions a stateless society where private ownership of the means of production is permissible, and economic decisions are made privately through the operation of a ]. Anarcho-capitalists espouse a ] rather than an intrinsic or modified ]; therefore, they have no opposition to profit. Though anarcho-capitalism ideas derive from classical liberalism and form ], much of the credit for the foundations of anarcho-capitalist theory goes to ] who formally synthesized these with ]. Other important anarcho-capitalists include ], ], ], and ]. Early influences on anarcho-capitalism include ], ], ], and ]. | |||
===Tolerance vs. Expansionism=== | |||
Since there are many different anarchist ], there are vastly different and often opposing ideas about: what constitutes aggression, what is valid property, and what forms and conventions societies should adopt. As a result, there is difference of opinion ''within'' each school about how to react to, or interact with, those with opposing ideologies. E.g. How should an anarcho-socialist commune react to an anarcho-capitalist firm next door? (And vice-versa.) | |||
Traditional anarchists tend to deny that anarcho-capitalism is a form of anarchism, often based upon the argument that anarchism entails opposition to coercive authority necessary for capitalism. The debate between the mainstream, anti-capitalist anarchism and anarcho-capitalism is covered further under ] and under the main ] article. Anarcho-capitalism is compared and contrasted with individualist anarchism in the article '']'' | |||
The tolerant attitude is to live with it - let reality be the judge. One should not use force to promote your program. Those who take this ] approach to 'foreign policy' generally predict that, since their system is better, it will attract more people in the long run. ] is a good example of this tolerant approach. | |||
===Parallel structures=== | |||
The intolerant (evangelical or expansionist may be more descriptive) attitude considers the other system aggressive and/or authoritarian by its very nature. Thus it is permissible, perhaps even a moral imperative, to use force against the perceived criminals. This attitude occurs among anarcho-capitalists, particularly those who cannot conceive of an anti-statist form of socialism. Indeed, "socialism" in colloquial speech is generally understood as "statist socialism." This attitude also occurs among anarcho-socialists, particularly those who cannot conceive of an anti-statist form of ]. Indeed, conventional socialist theory deems capitalism as necessarily authoritarian and exploitative. | |||
''See also:'' ], ] | |||
===Violence vs. Non-violence=== | |||
(dual-power networks, shadow economies, collectives, | |||
Anarchists have often been portrayed as dangerous and violent, due mainly to a number of high-profile violent acts including ]s, ]s, and ]s involving anarchists. The use of ] and ], however, is condemned by most anarchist ideology, though there remains no ] on the legitimacy or utility of violence. | |||
Anarchists engage in building parallel structures and organizations, such as ], radical labor unions, infoshop and radical social centers, new sets of schooling systems, media in various forms, organizing around housing and land issues, and work toward accountability with police and other institutions through such tools as ] decision-making. This is in line with the general anarchist concept of creating "dual-power", the idea of creating the structures for a new anti-authoritarian society in the shell of the old, hierarchical one. | |||
Some anarchists share Leo Tolstoy's ] belief in ]. These ] advocate ] as the only method of achieving a truly anarchist revolution. They often see violence as the basis of government and coercion and argue that, as such, violence is illegitimate, no matter who is the target. Some of Proudhon's ] followers even saw ] as coercive and refused to take part in such traditional socialist tactics. | |||
===Technology=== | |||
] and ] saw violence as a necessary and sometimes desirable force. Malatesta took the view that it is "necessary to destroy with violence, since one cannot do otherwise, the violence which denies to the workers" ('']'', number 125, September 6, 1921). | |||
''See also'': ] and ]. | |||
Between 1894 and 1901, individual anarchists assassinated numerous heads of state. Such "]" was not universally accepted among anarchists, and many in the movement condemned the tactic. For example, McKinley's assassin, ], claimed to be a disciple of ], but she disavowed any association with him. At the same time, Alexander Berkman, who was a close associate of Goldman's, went to prison for his attempted assassination of Carnegie Steel executive Henry Clay Frick as a reprisal for the company's heavy handed treatment of labor. Anarchists disagreed not only on whether such "attentats" -- as Berkman termed them -- were justified, but over the precise circumstances that legitimized them. Berkman and Goldman both condemned the McKinley assassination because it would cause repression and would neither be understood nor help the cause. Depictions in the press and popular fiction helped create a lasting public impression that anarchists are violent terrorists. This perception was enhanced by events such as the ], where anarchists were blamed for throwing a bomb at police who came to break up a public meeting in ]. ] was a terroristic movement in early ] Tsarist ] which, although largely bereft of political philiosophy did have connections with more "overground" oppositional movements including anarchism. In fact ] was a compatriot of Bakunin whom later distanced himself from the Nihilists after the well-publicised murder of one of Nechayev's student followers. | |||
Some have said that recent technological developments have made the anarchist cause both easier to advance and more conceivable to people. ] and the ] have made anonymous digital currencies such as e-gold an alternative to statist ]. Many people use ]s or the Internet to form loose communities that could be said to be organized along anarchist lines. Some of these communities have as their purpose the production of information in a non-commodified or ] format, a goal made attainable by the availability of ], ], and ]. These things have made it possible for individuals to ] over the Internet. There are also ] programming communities, who donate their time and offer their product for free. Examples include ], the ] (including the ]/] community and the ] paradigm), and ]. | |||
Some anarchists distinguish between "violence" and "property destruction": they claim that violence is when a person inflicts harm to another person, while property destruction or property damage is not violence, although it can have indirect harm such as financial harm. | |||
Some anarchists see ] as the way to replace hierarchy, defeat monopoly, and prevent war, and support ] in particular as a way to do so. Some writers — particularly ], who has written quite extensively in the ] genre about ], a futuristic society which has disposed of government — have theorised that anarchism would be inevitable with the technological advances that would make ] and living in space plausible . The Electro-anarchy Collective poses a similar theory that technological power will naturally overthrow human government (although some question their anarchist credentials, claiming that technological governance is no less oppressive than human governance). | |||
The ] and ] radicalism brought issues of violence and non-violence to the fore again. At the end of that decade new, more militant ] groups such as the ], ], ] and the ] conducted campaign with varying levels of violence. While some anarchists supported such groups regardless of their authoritarian politics, other anarchists and commentators see modern ]s as closer to ], ] and the ] than to recent modern current of anarchism. | |||
It has also been argued that the ] is an example of anarchic organization, this being an example not of hierarchical business, but of voluntary association for the production of a good. | |||
===Pacifism vs. War=== | |||
Some anarchists consider ] (]) to be inherent in their philosophy. Some anarchists take it further and follow ]'s belief in ] (note, however, that these ] are not necessarily ] as Tolstoy was), advocating ] as the only method of achieving a truly anarchist ]. | |||
===Post-structuralism=== | |||
Anarchist literature often portrays war as an activity in which the state seeks to gain and consolidate power, both domestically and in foreign lands. Many anarchists subscribe to ]'s view that "war is the health of the state". Anarchists believe that if they were to support a war they would be strengthening the state — indeed, ] was alienated from other anarchists when he expressed support for the British in ]. | |||
''See also:'' ] | |||
Just as they are critical and distrustful of most government endeavours, anarchists often view the stated reasons for war with a ] eye. Since the ] in ] and, most recently, the ], much anarchist activity has been anti-war based. | |||
The term post-anarchism was originated by Saul Newman in his book "From Bakunin to Lacan: Antiauthoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power" to refer to a theoretical move towards a synthesis of classical anarchist theory and ] thought. In this sense it has similarities with post-Marxism associated with ] and Chantal Mouffee. Subsequent to Newman's use of the term, however, it has taken on a life of its own and a wide range of ideas including ], ], ], ] and Zapatismo have been suggested for inclusion under the rubric. Others have argued that the term "poststructuralist anarchism" is preferable in order to maintain an unbroken link with the anarchist heritage. | |||
Many anarchists in the current movement however, reject complete pacifism, (although groups like Earth First!, and ] are based on principles of non-violence), and instead are in favor of self-defense, and sometimes violence against oppressive and authoritarian forces which they in fact also consider as defensive violence. Most anarchists are skeptical however of winning a direct armed conflict with the state, and many instead concern themselves mostly with organizing. Most anarchists however, do not consider the destruction of property to be violent, as do some other activists who believe in non-violence. | |||
By its very nature post-anarchism rejects the idea that it should be a coherent set of doctrines and beliefs. As such it is difficult, if not impossible, to state with any degree of certainty who should or shouldn't be grouped under the rubric. Nonetheless key thinkers associated with post-anarchism include ], ], ] and ]. | |||
===Parliamentarianism=== | |||
While most anarchists firmly oppose voting, or otherwise participating in the State institution, there are a few that disagree. Even the most vocal anarchists (e.g. Proudhon) have at times succumbed to the temptation of electoral politics, and more often than not regretted it. ] is a anarchist school of thought which emphasizes "tending your own garden" and "neither ballots nor bullets." The anarchist case against voting is explained in by Alvin Lowi, Jr. | |||
''External reference:'' | |||
== Criticism == | |||
See also '']'' for a general critique of socialism, some of which may apply to anarchism. Criticisms specific to each school of anarchist thought can be found under their corresponding articles. | |||
=== |
===Against ideology=== | ||
One criticism of anarchism claims that the lack of a state (in particular, police and military forces) would leave the community defenseless against organised violence. Many anarchists believe in a distinction between interpersonal violence and state violence. They see interpersonal violence as a creation of class society and patriarchy, effectively producing people predisposed to violence. State violence is viewed by all anarchists as the result of power structures and the nature of the state. Briefly, anarchists believe that the establishment of anarchy will preclude most individual and social violence. Anarchists also point to examples of autonomous and anarchist societies in which the self-management of society has led to a reduction in crime; for example, Zapatista communities, the Spanish Revolution, and various IWW-led uprisings and strikes that have caused short-term near-anarchic situations. | |||
''See also:'' ] | |||
Most anarchists perceive the need for some kind of organised communal self-defence, in the context of a world with continuing states and other repressive institutions. For many, this would take the form of an armed voluntary militia undifferentiated from the community at large, and organised on a fundamentally collective basis. Additionally, most anarchists perceive the need for social systems of mediation and arbitration to resolve disputes in a voluntary manner, replacing the judicial functions of courts. However, individualist anarchists tend to advocate "private police" and private courts to protect individual liberty and private property. | |||
Post-left anarchy seeks to distance itself from the traditional "left" - communists, liberals, social democrats, etc. - and to escape the confines of ] in general. It has rapidly developed since the fall of the ], which many view as the death of authoritarian leftism; however, its roots are clearly visible in the ideas of the 1960s ]. It is not an independent "movement" as such but rather a critical way of thinking about anarchist ideas. | |||
Critics, however, express doubts concerning the effectiveness of a voluntary militia against a ruthless modern military using ] and hierarchical structure. Critics also argue that historical examples, like the ], do not support the theory that anarchist communities can defend themselves. Some anarchists argue that examples like the Spanish Civil War actually support their contention that even communities who face vastly superior forces and are poorly supplied can hold out when they believe they are fighting for a just cause. | |||
Post-leftists argue that anarchism has been weakened by its long attachment to contrary "leftist" movements and single issue causes (], ], etc.). It calls for a synthesis of anarchist thought and a specifically anti-authoritarian revolutionary movement outside of the leftist milieu. It often focuses on the individual rather than speaking in terms of class or other broad generalizations and shuns organizational tendencies in favor of the complete absence of hierarchy. Total individual liberation is a key focus, rather than merely economic liberation. | |||
=== Production === | |||
''Main article: ]'' | |||
Important groups and individuals associated with Post-left anarchy include: ], the magazine ] and its editor ], ], and others. For more information, see Infoshop.org's section, and the on | |||
Some critics of Anarchism claim that modern economic production in a stateless society is impossible. This critique assumes that economic order can only result from State central planning or capitalist market forces. Social, democratic or other emergent structures of production are seen as impossible within this critique. | |||
===Personal practice=== | |||
In a stateless society where one community has no formal relationship with another, as some anarchists envision, production would be localized, eliminating the benefits of ] and regional specialization. Some anarchists see a positive social value in communities producing the majority of their own needs, this would mean socially chosen losses in economic efficiency. Other anarchists oppose the transportation of goods for environmental reasons, the mass production of goods for cultural or environmental reasons, or industrial production for ethical and environmental reasons. However, many anarchists support the socialisation of industrial production, and see no contradiction between producing for economies of scale and community interests. | |||
'''Small 'a' anarchism''' is a term used in two different, but not unconnected contexts. | |||
Though anarchists are against a centrally controlled or coordinated economic system, most do believe that some sort of system (or multiple co-existing systems) must replace the current, capitalist system, either with a ], a ], or other, theoretical exchange/production paradigms. ] proposed that anarchy would allow for "the abolition of work". | |||
Dave Neal posited the term in opposition to big 'A' Anarchism in the article . While big 'A' Anarchism referred to ideological Anarchists, small 'a' anarchism was applied to their methodological counterparts; those who viewed anarchism as "a way of acting, or a historical tendency against illegitimate authority." As an anti-ideological position, small 'a' anarchism shares some similarities with ], while Neal's insistence that it entails a rejection of the idea that there can be an "ultimate Truth" recalls the poststructuralist turns of post-anarchism (see above). | |||
David Graeber and Andrej Grubacic offer an alternative use of the term, applying it to groups and movements organising according to or acting in a manner consistent with anarchist principles of decentralisation, voluntary association, mutual aid, the network model, and crucially, "the rejection of any idea that the end justifies the means, let alone that the business of a revolutionary is to seize state power and then begin imposing one's vision at the point of a gun." Graeber and Grubacic do not offer a comprehensive list of groups within this rubric, but suggest that it includes the likes of autonomism, Zapatismo and radical democracy. It should be stressed that many of these groups do not describe themselves as "anarchist", perhaps deliberately, and are grouped instead on the basis of what they do, implying that the criteria for inclusion are similar to those articulated by Neal. | |||
It is unclear how far the term has been picked up by the wider anarchist movement, but it does help to clarify and begin to explain some of the conflicts and disagreements within contemporary anarchism. | |||
==Unsorted sections== | |||
'''Many of these sections down here can be merged into preceding sections, esp. the "conflict" discussions. Much can be deleted as it is redundant.''' | |||
===Conceptions of an anarchist society=== | |||
''See also:'' ] | |||
Many political philosophers justify support of the state as a means of regulating violence, so that the destruction caused by human conflict is minimized and fair relationships are established. Anarchists argue that pursuit of these ends does not justify the establishment of a state, and in fact many argue that the state is incompatible with those goals. Anarchists argue that the state helps to create a ], and uses force and violence to expand and protect elite interests. Much effort has been dedicated to explaining how anarchist societies would handle criminality. | |||
===Pacifism=== | |||
Some anarchists consider ] (opposition to ]) to be inherent in their philosophy. Some anarchists take it further and follow ]'s belief in ] (note, however, that these ] are not necessarily ] as Tolstoy was), advocating ] as the only method of achieving a truly anarchist ]. | |||
Anarchist literature often portrays war as an activity in which the state seeks to gain and consolidate power, both domestically and in foreign lands. Many anarchists subscribe to ]'s view that "war is the health of the state". Anarchists believe that if they were to support a war they would be strengthening the state — indeed, ] was alienated from other anarchists when he expressed support for the British in ]. | |||
Just as they are critical and distrustful of most government endeavours, anarchists often view the stated reasons for war with a ] eye. Since the ] protests in ] and, most recently, the protests against the ], much anarchist activity has been ] based. | |||
Many anarchists in the current movement however, reject complete pacifism, (although groups like Earth First!, and ] are based on principles of non-violence), and instead are in favor of self-defense, and sometimes violence against oppressive and authoritarian forces which they in fact also consider as defensive violence. Anarchists are skeptical however of winning a direct armed conflict with the state, and instead concern themselves mostly with organizing. Most anarchists however, do not consider the destruction of property to be violent, as do most activists who believe in non-violence. | |||
===Parliamentarianism=== | |||
While most anarchists firmly oppose voting, or otherwise participating in the State institution, there are a few that disagree. Even hard-core anarchists (e.g. Proudhon) have succumbed to the temptation of electoral politics - and inevitably regretted it. ] is a anarchist school of thought which emphasizes "tending your own garden" and "neither ballets nor bullets." The anarchist case against voting is explained in by George H. Smith. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ], for a symbol of anarchism | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ], for a symbol of anarchism | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
===Historical events=== | ===Historical events=== | ||
*] (]) | *] (]) | ||
*] (]) | *] (]) | ||
*] (] - ]) | |||
*] (]) | *] (]) | ||
*] (]) (see ]) | *] (]) (see ]) | ||
Line 352: | Line 378: | ||
===Books=== | ===Books=== | ||
*], '''', '' |
*], '''', ''Prison Memoirs of an Anarchist'', others | ||
*], '''', '' |
*], '''', ''The Paris Commune and the Idea of the State'', others | ||
*], | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '''' | |||
*], '''', ''Living My Life'', others | *], '''', ''Living My Life'', others | ||
*], '']'' | *], '']'' | ||
*], '']'', '']'', others | *], '']'', '']'', others | ||
*] '']'' (a novel) | |||
*], '']'' | *], '']'' | ||
*], ''Anarcho-Syndicalism'' | *], ''Anarcho-Syndicalism'' | ||
*] '']'' (Anarcho-capitalist) | |||
*], '']'' Historians look at technology & implications | |||
*], '']'' Classic utilitarian defense of anarchism | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' Analysis of State; political means vs. economic means | |||
*], '']'' Oppenheimer's thesis applied to early US history | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], ''The Kingdom of God is Within You'' | |||
*], ''The Unknown Revolution'' | *], ''The Unknown Revolution'' | ||
*], '']'' | *], '']'' | ||
*], '''' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' Contractarian (as opposed to Natural Law or utilitarian) anarchism | |||
*], ''The Kingdom of God is Within You'' - Christian pacifist anarchism | |||
===Concepts=== | |||
*], ''The Society of the Spectacle'' | |||
''Main article: ]'' | |||
*], ''Temporary Autonomous Zones'' Ontological anarchism | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
===Anarchist organizations=== | |||
''Main article: ]'' | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
While all of these ] have anarchists as members, many are inclusive beyond anarchist and include ] and ]. | |||
===Anarchism by region/culture=== | ===Anarchism by region/culture=== | ||
Line 451: | Line 399: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* hosts and | |||
* Peter Kropotkin's for the 11th edition Encyclopedia Britannica (1911). | |||
* A selection of websites, books, and online articles that explore social anarchism. | |||
* Peter Kropotkin's for the 11th edition Encyclopedia Britannica (1911). | |||
* from the MS Encarta Encyclopedia | |||
* from Columbia Encyclopedia | |||
* | |||
* * | |||
* Bryan Caplan's covers both socialist and capitalist forms of anarchism. | |||
*An is written from the perspective of the socialist anarchist movement. | |||
* - (]) | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* from ''The Conquest of Power'' by Albert Weisbord, on individualist anarchism in America | |||
* from ''The Conquest of Power'' by Albert Weisbord | |||
* compares and contrasts the role of violence in the two movements | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
*Hundreds of anarchists are listed, with short bios, links & dedicated pages | *Hundreds of anarchists are listed, with short bios, links & dedicated pages | ||
*, also harbours a few communists and socialists. | |||
* | * | ||
* | |||
* Blogs by Anarchists. | * Blogs by Anarchists. | ||
* intends to be an anarchist encyclopedia using the ] engine. | * intends to be an anarchist encyclopedia using the ] engine. | ||
* extensively archives information relating to famous anarchists. This includes many of their books and other publications. | * extensively archives information relating to famous anarchists. This includes many of their books and other publications. | ||
* A selection of websites, books, and online articles that explore social anarchism. | |||
* (pdf) is an article from a law enforcement perspective that includes a look at tactics, philosophy and a history of the Anarchist movement in the United States. | |||
* | |||
**, a wiki about anarchist-related topics. | |||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
* (pdf), an article on the congruence of Jesus's biblical teachings and anarchism | |||
* - an analysis of anarchist use of consensus, by the ]. | |||
* - an analysis of anarchist use of consensus, by the ] | |||
* | * | ||
* - (]) | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
Line 490: | Line 418: | ||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* by Andrej Grubacic at the ] | * by Andrej Grubacic at the ] | ||
* Italian anarchist site | |||
* Ontario Anarchist Networking | * Ontario Anarchist Networking | ||
=== Opposing views === | |||
* Objections and rebuttals, from ''The Dandelion'' 1977-79 | * Objections and rebuttals, from ''The Dandelion'' 1977-79 | ||
* (pdf) is an article from a law enforcement perspective that includes a look at tactics, philosophy and a history of the Anarchist movement in the United States. | |||
* | |||
* and from ''The Conquest of Power'' by Marxist historian Albert Weisbord | |||
* Anarchist News and Opinions Blog from Boston | |||
* | |||
=== Opposing Views === | |||
* | * | ||
* A criticism from an ] perspective (includes a criticism of anarcho-capitalism), 1971 | |||
* A criticism by ], 1992 | |||
* by John William Lloyd, a criticism of individualist anarchism and mutualism from a former individualist anarchist turned minarchist, 1927 | |||
* by ] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] |
Revision as of 20:29, 30 October 2005
Anarchism is a generic term describing various political philosophies and social movements that advocate the elimination of all forms of social hierarchy. In place of centralized political structures, private ownership of the means of production, and exploitative economic institutions such as rent and profit, these movements favor social relations based upon voluntary interaction and self-management, and aspire to a society characterised by autonomy and freedom. These philosophies use anarchy to mean a society based on voluntary interaction of free individuals, and the idea that communities and individuals have a say in decisions to the degree that they are affected by their outcomes.
While opposition to coercive institutions and socially constructed hierarchies are primary tenets of anarchism, anarchism is also a positive vision of how a voluntary society would work. There is considerable variation amongst anarchist philosophies. Opinions differ in various areas, such as whether violence should be employed to foster anarchism, what type of economic system should exist, questions on the environment and industrialism, and anarchists' roles in other movements.
The terms "anarchy" and "anarchism" are derived from the Greek αναρχία ("without archons (rulers)"). Thus "anarchism," in its most general meaning, is the belief that rulership is unnecessary and should be abolished. The word "anarchy", as most anarchists use it, does not imply chaos or anomie, but rather a stateless society with voluntary social relations.
Precursors of anarchism
Primitive cultures
Anarcho-primitivists assert that, for the longest period before recorded history, human society was organized on anarchist principles. They point to the egalitarian structure of hunter-gatherer bands, to the lack of division of labour and accumulated wealth, and the lack of decreed law, as indicators of such primitive anarchy.
Philosophical traces
Some anarchists have embraced Taoism, which developed in Ancient China, as a source of anarchistic attitudes . Similarly, anarchistic tendencies can be traced to the philosophers of Ancient Greece, such as Zeno, the founder of the Stoic philosophy, and Aristippus, who said that the wise should not give up their liberty to the state . Later movements – such as Stregheria in the 1300's, the Free Spirit in the Middle Ages, the Anabaptists, The Diggers, and the Ranters, – have also expounded ideas that have been interpreted as anarchist.
Ancient Greece
The first known usage of the word anarchy appears in the play Seven Against Thebes by Aeschylus, dated 467 BC. There, Antigone openly refuses to abide by the rulers' decree to leave her brother Polyneices' body unburied, as punishment for his participation in the attack on Thebes, saying that "even if no one else is willing to share in burying him I will bury him alone and risk the peril of burying my own brother. Nor am I ashamed to act in defiant opposition to the rulers of the city (ekhous apiston tênd anarkhian polei)".
Ancient Greece also saw the first western instance of anarchism as a philosophical ideal, in the form of the stoic philosopher Zeno of Citium, who was, according to Kropotkin, "he best exponent of Anarchist philosophy in ancient Greece". As summarized by Kropotkin, Zeno "repudiated the omnipotence of the state, its intervention and regimentation, and proclaimed the sovereignty of the moral law of the individual". Within Greek philosophy, Zeno's vision of a free community without government is opposed to the state-Utopia of Plato's Republic. Zeno argued that although the necessary instinct of self-preservation leads humans to egotism, nature has supplied a corrective to it by providing man with another instinct — sociability. Like many modern anarchists, he believed that if people follow their instincts, they will have no need of law, courts, or police, no temples and no public worship, and use no money (a gift economy taking the place of the exchanges). Zeno's beliefs have only reached us as fragmentary quotations.
The Anabaptists
The Anabaptists of 16th century Europe are sometimes considered to be religious forerunners of modern anarchism. Bertrand Russell, in his History of Western Philosophy, writes that the Anabaptists "repudiated all law, since they held that the good man will be guided at every moment by the Holy Spirit...rom this premise they arrive at communism...." The novel Q by Luther Blissett provides a fictional depiction of this movement and its revolutionary ideology. Gerrard Winstanley of The Diggers, who published a pamphlet calling for communal ownership and social and economic organization in small agrarian communities in the 17th century, is considered another of the forerunners of modern anarchism.
History of anarchism
Justice against the state
William Godwin, in An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice" (1793) wrote what would become core anarchist critiques of government, economics, and society; though he did not use the word anarchism, some today regard him as the "founder of philosophical anarchism"
By "political justice" Godwin meant "the adoption of any principle of morality and truth into the practice of a community," and his characteristically anarchist conclusion was that government in fact inhibits rather than fosters justice.
Godwin's philosophy was optimistic about the potential for human beings to develop and conduct social relations on the basis of reason and consent. He believed that there are no innate principles, and therefore no original propensity to evil. He considered that "our virtues and our vices may be traced to the incidents which make the history of our lives, and if these incidents could be divested of every improper tendency, vice would be extirpated from the world." The control of man by man in general, and the institution of government in particular, are detrimental to human development. "Government by its very nature counteracts the improvement of original mind."
Godwin's masterpiece was published in 1793, in the last stages of the French Revolution. The themes of his work, some of which he later retracted, would become central to the future development of anarchism. But at this point no anarchist movement yet existed, and the term 'anarchiste' was known only as an insult hurled by the bourgeois Girondins at more elements in the revolution. (Some of whom, the Parisian Sans-culottes, are seen by many as the immediate predecessors of working-class anarchism.)
What is property?
It's commonly held that it wasn't until Pierre-Joseph Proudhon published "What is Property?" in 1840 that the term "anarchist" was adopted as a self-description. It is for this reason that some claim Proudhon as the founder of modern anarchist theory.
In "What is Property?" Proudhon answers with the famous accusation "Property is theft." He opposed the institution of property (propriete) involving full 'rights of use and abuse' as it exists in capitalism; but he supported a more limited right of 'possession' (possession) by individuals of the means and produce of their own labour. Proudhon's vision of anarchy (which he called mutualism (mutuellisme)) thus involved a non-coercive exchange economy where individuals would trade the produce of their labour. This would be a market system without profit; goods would be traded on the basis of the labour time; a national bank would lend without interest to support production. Without property interests to protect, the state would become superfluous.
Proudhon generally opposed violent expropriation of property; instead he tended to advocate schemes (including the formation of an interest-free bank) whereby workers would create mutual organisations that could come to supplant capitalism and render the state superfluous. Proudhon's ideas began to exert some influence within French working class movements, and his followers were active in the Revolution of 1848 in France. However authoritarian socialist tendencies such as Blanquism were a stronger force in Proudhon's own time.
Proudhon's work on property raised a central issue in the future development of anarchism. The question of property, and its place in an anarchist society, is sometimes seen as dividing anarchism thereafter into two major streams or tendencies which can loosely be called 'individualism' and 'collectivism'.
The International - Anarchism becomes a mass movement
In Europe, a period of harsh reaction following the widespread revolutionary activity of 1848. The next major phase of revolutionary activity began almost twenty years later with the founding of the International Workingmen's Association, also sometimes called the 'First International, in London in 1864.
The International Workingmen's Association, at its founding, was an alliance of diverse socialist groups, including French Mutualists, English Owenites, and others. Over its short life it grew into a major movement, with local federations in many countries developing strong bases of working class activism. But at the same time the international began to polarise into two camps, with Karl Marx and Mikhail Bakunin as their respective figureheads.
Both sides had a stated common aim (stateless communism), and common political opponents (the ruling class). But each was critical of the other, and the conflict between the two groups intensified. Perhaps the clearest differences emerged over proposed strategies for achieving their visions of socialism. The anarchists grouped around Bakunin favoured (in Kropotkin's words) "direct economical struggle against capitalism, without interfering in the political parliamentary agitation." Marxist thinking, at that time, focused on parliamentary activity. (Particularly when the new German Empire of 1871 became the first country to introduce manhood suffrage, leading many German socialists to focus their energies within the then Marxist Social Democratic Party of Germany.)
Bakunin characterised Marx's ideas as authoritarian, and predicted that if a Marxist party gained to power its leaders would end up as bad as the ruling class they had fought against (notably in his Statism and Anarchy.) In 1872, the conflict in the First International climaxed with the expulsion of Bakunin and those who had become known as the "Bakuninists" when they were outvoted by the Marxists at the Hague Congress. This is often cited as the origin of the long-running conflict between anarchists and Marxists. From then on, the authoritarian and libertarian currents of socialism had distinct organisations, at various points including rival 'internationals'.
Unfortunately, many of the debates between the opposing camps became heated to the point of abusiveness. Bakunin did not restrain himself from hurling anti-German and anti-semitic slurs at Marx.
The theory of Anarchist Communism
See also: Anarchist communism
Unlike Marxism, anarchism has never had one central set of texts or authorities. But in the last three decades of the nineteenth century the anarchism of many of Bakunin's followers did gradually develop into a clearer position embracing an idea of communism.
The Italian federation of the First International, which overwhelmingly took the Bakuninist line, was the first organisation to set out an explicit vision of communist anarchism. The Italian anarchists included Carlo Cafiero, Errico Malatesta, Andrea Costa and other ex-Mazzinian Republicans. At its Florence Conference of 1876, their federation stated its principles as follows:
- "The Italian Federation considers the collective property of the products of labour as the necessary complement to the collectivist programme, the aid of all for the satisfaction of the needs of each being the only rule of production and consumption which corresponds to the principle of solidarity."
In his Anarchie et Communisme, Cafiero argued that private property even in the product of labor (Mutualist 'possession') will lead to unequal accumulation of capital, and therefore to class distinctions.
Anarchist communists advocate an egalitarian society without markets or wages, based on the principle of "from each according to their ability, to each according to need." Decisions would be made through workers councils and assemblies. There would be direct worker control of production, and self-management of community instutions. Communities, groups and workplaces would be connected together through federations and networks created by free association and popular affinity.
Perhaps the most important theorist of anarchist communism was Peter Kropotkin. In a number of works including The Conquest of Bread and Fields, Factories and Workshops, Kropotkin plotted his views of what anarchist communist society might look like and how it might be achieved. Kropotkin's anarchist communism was closely linked to his scientific theory based on evolution in which co-operation equaled or surpassed competition in importance, as illustrated in Mutual Aid: A Factor in Evolution (1897).
Subsequent figures in the theory of anarchist communism include Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman. The anarcho-syndicalist movements (see below) generally saw anarchist communism as their objective. Isaac Puente's 1932 Comunismo Libertario was adopted by the Spanish CNT as its manifesto for an anarchist communist society. Most recently, groups like NEFAC (North Eastern Federation of Anarcho-Communists), have advocated various forms of anarchist communism.
Historically, anarchist communism is believed to have been put into practice by millions of people in the anarchist collectives and communes of the anarchist-controlled region of Ukraine during the Russian Revolution, and during the Spanish Civil War in the Aragon and Catalonia regions of Spain.
Anarchist communists today are involved in various broad labor and community issues; generally revolving around housing, labor struggles/strikes, anti-racism, and building the anarchist movement. Anarchist communists have generally called for more cohesive groups and structures of anarchist groups and thereby garnered criticism from other anarchist sects. Various large-scale groups of anarchist communists exist today with the larger groups existing throughout various countries.
Individualism
See also: Individualist anarchism, mutualism, Anarchism and capitalism, Anarchist economics
Individualists, taking much from the writings of Max Stirner, among others, demanded the utmost respect for the liberty of the individual. While some individualists looked to natural law to justify individualism, Stirner's "Egoism" held that self-interest is the only legitimate justification for action. While its roots include William Godwin, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, and Max Stirner, it is most often associated with the American tradition of individualist anarchism, which advocates private possession (individual ownership of the "full produce" of one's labor) and a market economy where this property may be bought and sold.
In the United States, anarchist thoughts were expressed in the writings of Josiah Warren, Benjamin Tucker, and Lysander Spooner. They espouse a labor theory of value, and, as a result, they regard profit (and thus capitalism), as being exploitative. Wage labor is supported as long as wages adhere to the labor theory of value, hence, traditional individualists tend to advocate, and practice, an economic system called mutualism as an alternative to capitalism and communism. The major tenets of mutualism are free association, mutualist credit, contract (or federation), and gradualism (or dual-power). Individualists oppose property titles to unused land, arguing that land must be possessed to be legitimate property. Individualism contrasts with collectivist forms of anarchism (anarcho-communism and anarcho-syndicalism), and the relationships between these groups of been characterized by varying degrees of antagonism and harmony throughout their history.
Many also consider Henry David Thoreau as an individualist anarchist due to his position that individuals should not be governed and his belief that all should be free to withdraw themselves from "any incorporated body." Noteworthy anarchist writer and poet John Henry Mackay is also considered an individualist anarchist. Contemporary individualist anarchists include Robert Anton Wilson, and Joe Peacott.
Propaganda by the deed
Anarchists have often been portrayed as dangerous and violent, due mainly to a number of high-profile violent acts including riots, assassinations, and insurrections involving anarchists. Some revolutionaries of the late 19th century encouraged acts of political violence, such as bombings and the assassinations of heads of state to further anarchism. Such actions have sometimes been called 'propaganda by the deed'.
Between 1894 and 1901, individual anarchists assassinated numerous heads of state. For example, US President McKinley's assassin, Leon Czolgosz, claimed to be a disciple of Emma Goldman - although Goldman disavowed any association with him. Because international terrorism arose during this time period with the widespread distribution of dynamite, bombings were associated with anarchists, an image that remains to this day. Depictions in the press and popular fiction helped create a lasting public impression that anarchists are violent terrorists. This perception was enhanced by events such as the Haymarket Riot, where anarchists were blamed for throwing a bomb at police who came to break up a public meeting in Chicago, Illinois.
The use of terrorism and assassination, however, is condemned by most anarchists. Even anarchists who see acts of violence as justified in a context of insurrection and class war would often view individual acts of terrorism as ineffective and counter-productive.
However there is no consensus on the legitimacy or utility of violence as such in the furtherance of anarchism. Mikhail Bakunin and Errico Malatesta saw violence as a necessary and sometimes desirable force. Malatesta took the view that it is "necessary to destroy with violence, since one cannot do otherwise, the violence which denies to the workers" (Umanità Nova, number 125, September 6, 1921).
Other anarchists share Leo Tolstoy's Christian anarchist belief in nonviolence. These anarcho-pacifists advocate nonviolent resistance as the only method of achieving a truly anarchist revolution. They often see violence as the basis of government and coercion and argue that, as such, violence is illegitimate, no matter who is the target. Some of Proudhon's French followers even saw strike action as coercive and refused to take part in such traditional socialist tactics.
Many anarchists would make a distinction between "violence" and "property destruction": they claim that violence is when a person inflicts harm to another person, while property destruction or property damage is not violence, although it can have indirect harm such as financial harm.
Anarchism at work
See also: Anarcho-syndicalism
In the late 19th century, anarcho-syndicalism developed as a movement pursuing industrial actions, especially the general strike, as the primary strategy to achieve anarchist revolution, and "build the new society in the shell of the old". Most anarcho-syndicalists shared a belief in anarchist communism as the best form of the future society, although not all anarchist communists agreed with syndicalism.
According to the preamble to the constitution of the US-based Industrial Workers of the World (also called IWW or Wobblies) syndicalist union:
- It is the historic mission of the working class to do away with capitalism. The army of production must be organized, not only for everyday struggle with capitalists, but also to carry on production when capitalism shall have been overthrown. By organizing industrially we are forming the structure of the new society within the shell of the old.
Anarcho-syndicalism formed a new wave of anarchism in beginning in the 1890's and 1900's. Even more than the anarchism of the International, this was anarchism brought out of the philosophy books and embodied in the ongoing struggle of millions of working class people.
After the fall of the Paris Commune in 1871 French anarchists and socialists had suffered a dark period of repression similar to the aftermath of the 1848 revolution. Anarchism began to resurface in the 1880's and 1890's, and was a particular influence upon the Bourses de Travails of autonomous workers groups and trade unions. It was from this ground that the CGT trade union confederation, founded in 1895, was born. The CGT was the first major anarcho-syndicalist movement.
CGT members Emile Pataud and Emile Pouget wrote the classic syndicalist text in 1909. The fictionalised How we will bring about the revolution (Comment nous ferons la revolution) tells the story of the birth of liberarian communism in a French general strike. However the CGT soon veered away from anarchism, and after the Russian Revolution of 1917 fell into the Communist camp. (The CGT is still an important French trade union, though now thoroughly reformist in sympathy.)
In Chicago in June 1905, a convention of two hundred socialists, anarchists, and radical trade unionists from all over the United States founded the IWW. At its peak in 1923 the organization claimed some 100,000 members in good standing, and could marshall the support of perhaps 300,000 workers.
Anarchism had been introduced into Spain by followers of Bakunin in the late 1860's, and quickly established itself as the dominant force within the Spanish socialist and working class movements. (See also - Anarchism in Spain.) Spanish anarchist trade union federations were formed in the 1870's and in 1900. But the most famous and most successful was the Confederación Nacional del Trabajo founded in 1910. The CNT was to become the major force in Spanish working class politics - it had a membership of 1.58 million in 1934. The CNT played a major role in the Spanish Civil War (see below).
In Berlin in 1922 the CNT was amongst trade unions who joined together to form the International Workers Association, an anarcho-syndicalist successor to the First International.
Anarcho-syndicalist unions live on to this day, though with nothing like the strength they once enjoyed. The IWW is still active, with currently around 1000 members. After defeat in the Spanish Civil War, CNT members were killed, imprisoned or forced into exile. Following the death of Franco, the CNT returned to Spain. Although disputes within the movement caused an acrimonious split shortly thereafter. Other current anarcho-syndicalist organizations include the Workers Solidarity Alliance in the US, and the Solidarity Federation in the UK.
Whilst engaging in everyday workplace struggles, anarcho-syndicalist trade unions distance themselves from the methods of reformist trade unions which in their view merely seek short-term and compromising improvements. Anarcho-syndicalism upholds principles of workers solidarity, direct action, and self-management.
Workers solidarity is the belief that all workers -- no matter what race, gender, or ethnic group -- are in a similar situation vis-à-vis their bosses. Furthermore, within capitalism, any gains or losses made by some workers in their relation to bosses will eventually impact all workers. Therefore, in order to gain liberation, all workers must support one another in their struggle against bosses.
Anarcho-syndicalists believe in using direct action — that is, action directly designed to confront a problem. Direct action can range from traditional strike action to active sabotage.
Furthermore, anarcho-syndicalists believe that workers' organizations — the organizations struggling against the wage system who, in anarcho-syndicalist theory, will eventually form the basis of a new society – should be self-managing. They should not have bosses or "business agents"; rather, the workers should be able to make decisions that affect them amongst themselves.
Some critics of anarcho-syndicalism contend that its focus on proletarian class struggle overlooks the needs of segments of society such as parents or others occupied with child-rearing or domestic labor, although some anarcho-syndicalist thought attempts to address other sectors of economic life. Some primitivist authors, notably Bob Black, contend that an anarcho-syndicalist revolution would leave in place social systems they find oppressive (work and workplaces, for example), although anarcho-syndicalists contend that worker self-management would render those systems fundamentally more humane.
The anarcho-syndicalist orientation of many early American labor unions played a large part in the formation of the American political spectrum. The United States is the only industrialized former British colony to not have a labor-based political party. In Mexico, anarcho-syndicalists like Ricardo Flores Magón led various revolts and uprisings that would help overthrow the dictator Diaz, lead the way for the growth of anarchism in Latin America, and also go on to influence the modern day Zapatista rebellion.
Insurrectionary Anarchism
Insurrectionary anarchism is critical of formal anarchist labor unions and federations. Instead, insurrectionary anarchists advocate informal organization, including small affinity groups, carrying out acts of resistance in various struggles, and mass organizations called base structures, which can include exploited individuals who are not anarchists. Here, Wolfi Landstreicher writes some of the basis points of its praxis.
Insurrectionary anarchism is not an ideological solution to all social problems, a commodity on the capitalist market of ideologies and opinions, but an on-going praxis aimed at putting an end to the domination of the state and the continuance of capitalism, which requires analysis and discussion to advance. We don’t look to some ideal society or offer an image of utopia for public consumption. Throughout history, most anarchists, except those who believed that society would evolve to the point that it would leave the state behind, have been insurrectionary anarchists. Most simply, this means that the state will not merely wither away, thus anarchists must attack, for waiting is defeat; what is needed is open mutiny and the spreading of subversion among the exploited and excluded. Here we spell out some implications that we and some other insurrectionary anarchists draw from this general problem: if the state will not disappear on its own, how then do we end its existence? It is, therefore, primarily a practice, and focuses on the organization of attack...The State of capital will not “wither away,” attack is the refusal of mediation, pacification, sacrifice, accommodation, and compromise.
Alfredo M. Bonanno, an Italian insurrectionary anarchist also had a great impact on this specific tendency, writing such works as "Armed Joy," "The Anarchist Tension," and others. In the US, Willful Disobedience, Killing King Abacus, and other magazines caused interest in insurrectionary anarchism to grow.
Anarchism and feminism
See also: Anarcha-Feminism
Anarcha-feminism is a kind of radical feminism that espouses the belief that patriarchy is a fundamental problem in some societies. While anarchist feminism has existed for more than a hundred years, its explicit formulation as anarcha-feminism dates back to at least 1971, during the second-wave feminist movement. Anarcha-feminism, views patriarchy as the first manifestation of hierarchy in human history; thus, the first form of oppression occurred in the dominance of male over female. Anarcha-feminists then conclude that if feminists are against patriarchy, they must also be against all forms of hierarchy, and therefore must reject the authoritarian nature of the state and capitalism.
Anarcho-primitivists see the creation of gender roles and patriarchy a creation of the start of civilization, and therefore consider primitivism to also be an anarchist school of thought that addresses feminist concerns. Eco-feminism is often considered a feminist variant of green anarchist feminist thought.
Anarcha-feminism is most often associated with early 20th-century authors and theorists such as Emma Goldman and Voltairine de Cleyre, although even early first-wave feminist Mary Wollstonecraft held proto-anarchist views. In the Spanish Civil War, an anarcha-feminist group, "Free Women", organized to defend both anarchist and feminist ideas.
In the modern day anarchist movement, many anarchists, male or female, consider themselves feminists, and anarcha-feminist ideas are growing. The publishing of Quiet Rumors, an anarcha-feminist reader, has helped to spread various kinds of anti-authoritarian and anarchist feminist ideas to the broader movement.
Religion
See also: Christian anarchism, Anarchism and religion
Christian anarchism is the belief that there is only one source of authority to which Christians are ultimately answerable, the authority of God as embodied in the teachings of Jesus. Christian anarchists therefore feel that earthly authority such as government, or indeed the established church do not and should not have power over them. Christian anarchists are pacifists and oppose the use of all physical force, both proactive and reactive.
Christian anarchists believe that freedom from earthly authority will only be guided by the grace of God if individuals display compassion for others and turn the other cheek when confronted by violence. Its adherents believe this quest for freedom is justified spiritually and quote the teachings of Jesus, some of whom are critical of the existing establishment and church. They believe all individuals can directly communicate with God and will eventually unify in peace under this one God.
The most famous advocate of Christian anarchism was Leo Tolstoy, author of The Kingdom of God is Within You, who called for a society based on compassion, nonviolent principles and freedom.
Some Christian anarchists oppose war and other statist aggression through tax resistance, while others submit to taxation. Ammon Hennacy advocated tax resistance, while Tolstoy opposed it. Tolstoy claimed that the act of resisting taxes requires physical force to withold what a government tries to take. Contrary to this Hennacy, who like Tolstoy also believed in nonresistance, managed to resist taxes without resorting to physical force. Many Christian anarchists are vegetarian or vegan.
Spiritual Anarchism, or Divine Anarchy, was originally expressed by the political revolutionary, poet and yogi Sri Aurobindo during the First World War in a series of articles published in the Arya, and later made available in two books, The Human Cycle and The Ideal of Human Unity. The exaggerations of both individualistic and communistic streams of anarchist thought are harmonized by going beyond the vital and intellectual foundations of most other schools of anarchism and rooting itself firmly in the spiritual realization and dynamic perfection of the individual and universal godhead in the race.
A spiritual anarchist holds that a perfect form of social organization can only be achieved by governing our individual and collective life by a higher light than the intellectual reason, a deeper law of solidarity and oneness than emotional or mental bonds of association.
Although it has deviated significantly from its course, the international township of Auroville was originally intended to be organized as a Divine Anarchy, and may well one day fulfill its purpose.
The Russian Revolution
The Russian Revolution of 1917 was a seismic event in the development of anarchism as a movement and as a philosophy.
Anarchists participated alongside the Bolsheviks in both February and October revolutions, many anarchists initially supporting the Bolshevik coup. However the Bolsheviks soon turned against the anarchists and other left-wing opposition, a conflict which culminated in the 1918 Kronstadt rebellion. Anarchists in central Russia were imprisoned or driven underground, or joined the victorious Bolsheviks. In Ukraine anarchists fought in the civil war against both Whites and Bolsheviks within the Makhnovshchina peasant army led by Nestor Makhno).
Expelled American anarchists Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman before leaving Russia were amongst those agitating in response to Bolshevik policy and the suppression of the Kronstadt uprising. Both wrote classic accounts of their experiences in Russia, aiming to expose the reality of Bolshevik control. For them, Bakunin's predictions about the consequences of Marxist rule had proved all too true.
The victory of the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution and the resulting Russian Civil War did serious damage to anarchist movements internationally. Many workers and activists saw Bolshevik success as setting an example; Communist parties grew at the expense of anarchism and other socialist movements. In France and the US for example, the major syndicalist movements of the CGT and IWW began to realign themselves away from anarchism and towards the Communist International.
In Paris, a group of Russian anarchist exiles around Nestor Makhno concluded that anarchists needed to develop new forms of organisation in response to the strutures of Bolshevism. Their manifesto known as the Platform, or the "Organizational Platform of Libertarian Communists", was supported by some Anarchist Communists, but opposed by many others.
The fight against fascism
In the 1920s and 1930s the familiar dynamics of anarchism's conflict with the state were transformed by the rise of fascism in Europe. In many cases, European anarchists faced difficult choices - should they join in popular fronts with reformist democrats and Soviet-led Communists against a common fascist enemy?
Luigi Fabbri, an exile from Italian fascism, was amongst those arguing that fascism was something different:
Fascism is not just another form of government which, like all others, uses violence. It is the most authoritarian and the most violent form of government imaginable. It represents the utmost glorification of the theory and practice of the principle of authority.
In France, where the fascists came close to insurrection in the February 1934 riots, anarchists divided over a 'united front' policy. (see David Berry, ‘Fascism or Revolution!’ Anarchism and Antifascism in France, 1933-39*) ]
In Spain, the CNT initially refused to join a popular front electoral alliance, and abstention by CNT supporters led to a right wing election victory. But in 1936, the CNT changed its policy and anarchist votes helped bring the popular front back to power. Months later, the right responded with an attempted coup, and the Spanish Civil War was underway.
In the history of anarchism the Spanish Civil War of (1936-1939) is a defining event on at least the scale of the First International or the Russian Revolution of 1917. A widely popular anarchist movement supported by anti-fascist militias took control of the industrial stronghold of Barcelona, and rural areas mainly in northeast Spain where they collectivized the land. For a few brief months in 1936-37 libertarian communism was being put into practice.
But even before the eventual fascist victory, the anarchists were losing ground in a bitter struggle with the Soviet-backed communists. Whilst the CNT leadership often appeared confused and divided, Communist-led troops suppressed the collectives, and the revolution was destroyed. Anarchism has never since come so close to realising the dream of libertarian communism as in that short summer of anarchy.
Contemporary anarchism
Punk rock
A surge of popular interest in anarchism occurred during the 1960s and 1970s. In the UK this was associated with the punk rock movement; the band Crass is celebrated for its anarchist and pacifist ideas. In Denmark, the Freetown Christiania was created in downtown Copenhagen. The housing and employment crisis in most of Western Europe led to the formation of communes and squatter movements like the one still thriving in Barcelona, in Catalonia. Militant resistance to neo-Nazi groups in places like Germany, and the uprisings of autonomous Marxism, situationist, and Autonomist groups in France and Italy also helped to give popularity to anti-authoritarian, non-capitalist ideas.
For further details, see anarcho-punk
Environmentalism
See also: Green anarchism
Eco-anarchism generally is a belief in deep ecology, direct action against earth destroying institutions and systems, and generally a critique of industrial capitalism, although generally not against civilization per se.
There is a significant anarchist element to the environmental movement, including those that are known as eco-anarchists and green-anarchists. Eco-anarchism is generally a broad term that broadly refers to anarchists engaged in the earth liberation movement. The largest segment of 'eco-anarchists' is the Earth First! movement, a network of various collectives formed along anarchist principles. Earth First! generally engages in direct action and eco-defense, such as tree sitting and 'locking down'. In the modern anarchist movement, eco-anarchists generally adhere to deep ecology, which is a worldview that embraces biodiversity and sustainability. Eco-feminism is also sometimes considered the form of eco-anarchist feminism.
Civil rights
See also: black anarchism, APOC, ARA
Anti-Racist Action is a loose federation of groups that focus on confronting (sometimes violently) racist agitators, such as the Klu Klux Klan or neo-Nazis when they appear in public.
Black anarchism opposes the existence of a state, capitalism, and subjugation and domination of people of color, and favors a non-hierarchical organization of society. Black anarchists, recognizing that anarchism has traditionally been European or white-based, seek to forge their own movement that represents their own identity and tailored to their own unique situation. Theorists include Ashanti Alston, Lorenzo Komboa Ervin, and Sam Mbah.
Anarchist People of Color was created as a forum for non-caucasian anarchists to express their thoughts about racial issues within the anarchist movement, particularly within the United States.
Globalization of capitalism
Globally, anarchism has also grown in popularity and influence as part of the anti-war, anti-capitalist, and anti-globalization movements. Since the late 1990s, anarchists have been known for their involvement in protests against World Trade Organization and Group of Eight meetings, and the World Economic Forum -- protests that are generally portrayed in mainstream media coverage as violent riots. Some anarchists form black blocs at protests, in which members of the bloc wear black and cover their faces to avoid police identification and to create one large solid mass. Bloc members confront and defend other protesters from the police, set up barricades, and sometimes engage in the destruction of corporate property.
Although black bloc anarchists are often the only visible anarchists at large protests, large-scale protests are often constructed and organized through anarchist structures. Affinity groupings, spokescouncils, and networking all have led to the success of various large-scale anti-war and anti-globalization mobilizations, most notably at the protests against the WTO Meeting of 1999 in Seattle. Anarchists have also been involved heavily with underground direct action movements such as the Animal Liberation Front, and the Earth Liberation Front, which are considered "eco-terrorist" by federal authorities and some liberal organizations. Anarchism (or at least anarchist systems of organizing) is now largely seen to have about the same sway in modern revolutionary movements as Marxism had in the 1960's.
The question of civilization
See also: anarcho-primitivism
Beginning in the later part of the 20th century anarchist John Zerzan wrote in Elements of Refusal, and later, Future Primitive that civilization — not just the state — would need to fall for anarchy to be achieved. A rejection of industrial technology is also prominent in the views of many green anarchists. This worldview was associated with the growth of the anti-roads movement in the UK, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front in the US, and the actions of Theodore Kaczynski (aka the "Unabomber").
Primitivism is a philosophy advocating a return to a pre-industrial and usually pre-agricultural society, and a critique of industrial civilization, and the alienation that technology, progress, etc, have created between people and the natural world. Primitivism believes that industrial society inevitably produces oppressive structures through specialization of tasks or division of labor, and that technology has similar negative implications. Most forms of primitivism question civilization itself. Primitivism generally sees that by the birth of agriculture, and the birth of cities and the creating of production surplus, gave rise to structures of hierarchy, and later statism. Anarcho-primitivists point to the anti-authoritarian nature of many 'primitive' or hunter-gatherer societies throughout the world's history, as examples of anarchist societies.
The primitivist movement has connections to radical environmentalism movements such as the Earth Liberation Front and Earth First!.
Anarcho-capitalism
See also: Anarcho-capitalism
Anarcho-capitalism envisions a stateless society where private ownership of the means of production is permissible, and economic decisions are made privately through the operation of a free market. Anarcho-capitalists espouse a subjective theory of value rather than an intrinsic or modified labor theory of value; therefore, they have no opposition to profit. Though anarcho-capitalism ideas derive from classical liberalism and form American individualist anarchism, much of the credit for the foundations of anarcho-capitalist theory goes to Murray Rothbard who formally synthesized these with Austrian economics. Other important anarcho-capitalists include David Friedman, Jan Narveson, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, and Lew Rockwell. Early influences on anarcho-capitalism include Gustave de Molinari, Lysander Spooner, Benjamin Tucker, and Herbert Spencer.
Traditional anarchists tend to deny that anarcho-capitalism is a form of anarchism, often based upon the argument that anarchism entails opposition to coercive authority necessary for capitalism. The debate between the mainstream, anti-capitalist anarchism and anarcho-capitalism is covered further under Anarchism and capitalism and under the main Anarcho-Capitalism article. Anarcho-capitalism is compared and contrasted with individualist anarchism in the article Individualist anarchism and anarcho-capitalism
Parallel structures
See also: anarchist economics, dual-power networks (dual-power networks, shadow economies, collectives,
Anarchists engage in building parallel structures and organizations, such as Food Not Bombs, radical labor unions, infoshop and radical social centers, new sets of schooling systems, media in various forms, organizing around housing and land issues, and work toward accountability with police and other institutions through such tools as consensus decision-making. This is in line with the general anarchist concept of creating "dual-power", the idea of creating the structures for a new anti-authoritarian society in the shell of the old, hierarchical one.
Technology
See also: Crypto-anarchism and Cypherpunk.
Some have said that recent technological developments have made the anarchist cause both easier to advance and more conceivable to people. Public key cryptography and the Internet have made anonymous digital currencies such as e-gold an alternative to statist fiat money. Many people use cell phones or the Internet to form loose communities that could be said to be organized along anarchist lines. Some of these communities have as their purpose the production of information in a non-commodified or use-value format, a goal made attainable by the availability of personal computing, desktop publishing, and digital media. These things have made it possible for individuals to share music files over the Internet. There are also open source programming communities, who donate their time and offer their product for free. Examples include Usenet, the free software movement (including the GNU/Linux community and the wiki paradigm), and Indymedia.
Some anarchists see information technology as the way to replace hierarchy, defeat monopoly, and prevent war, and support culture jamming in particular as a way to do so. Some writers — particularly Iain M. Banks, who has written quite extensively in the science fiction genre about The Culture, a futuristic society which has disposed of government — have theorised that anarchism would be inevitable with the technological advances that would make travelling and living in space plausible . The Electro-anarchy Collective poses a similar theory that technological power will naturally overthrow human government (although some question their anarchist credentials, claiming that technological governance is no less oppressive than human governance).
It has also been argued that the free software movement is an example of anarchic organization, this being an example not of hierarchical business, but of voluntary association for the production of a good.
Post-structuralism
See also: Post-anarchism
The term post-anarchism was originated by Saul Newman in his book "From Bakunin to Lacan: Antiauthoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power" to refer to a theoretical move towards a synthesis of classical anarchist theory and poststructuralist thought. In this sense it has similarities with post-Marxism associated with Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffee. Subsequent to Newman's use of the term, however, it has taken on a life of its own and a wide range of ideas including autonomism, post-left anarchy, situationism, post-colonialism and Zapatismo have been suggested for inclusion under the rubric. Others have argued that the term "poststructuralist anarchism" is preferable in order to maintain an unbroken link with the anarchist heritage.
By its very nature post-anarchism rejects the idea that it should be a coherent set of doctrines and beliefs. As such it is difficult, if not impossible, to state with any degree of certainty who should or shouldn't be grouped under the rubric. Nonetheless key thinkers associated with post-anarchism include Saul Newman, Todd May, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari.
External reference: Postanarchism Clearinghouse
Against ideology
See also: Post-left anarchy
Post-left anarchy seeks to distance itself from the traditional "left" - communists, liberals, social democrats, etc. - and to escape the confines of ideology in general. It has rapidly developed since the fall of the Soviet Union, which many view as the death of authoritarian leftism; however, its roots are clearly visible in the ideas of the 1960s Situationists. It is not an independent "movement" as such but rather a critical way of thinking about anarchist ideas.
Post-leftists argue that anarchism has been weakened by its long attachment to contrary "leftist" movements and single issue causes (anti-war, anti-nuclear, etc.). It calls for a synthesis of anarchist thought and a specifically anti-authoritarian revolutionary movement outside of the leftist milieu. It often focuses on the individual rather than speaking in terms of class or other broad generalizations and shuns organizational tendencies in favor of the complete absence of hierarchy. Total individual liberation is a key focus, rather than merely economic liberation.
Important groups and individuals associated with Post-left anarchy include: CrimethInc, the magazine Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed and its editor Jason McQuinn, Bob Black, and others. For more information, see Infoshop.org's Anarchy After Leftism section, and the Post-left section on anarchism.ws.
Personal practice
Small 'a' anarchism is a term used in two different, but not unconnected contexts.
Dave Neal posited the term in opposition to big 'A' Anarchism in the article Anarchism: Ideology or Methodology?. While big 'A' Anarchism referred to ideological Anarchists, small 'a' anarchism was applied to their methodological counterparts; those who viewed anarchism as "a way of acting, or a historical tendency against illegitimate authority." As an anti-ideological position, small 'a' anarchism shares some similarities with post-left anarchy, while Neal's insistence that it entails a rejection of the idea that there can be an "ultimate Truth" recalls the poststructuralist turns of post-anarchism (see above).
David Graeber and Andrej Grubacic offer an alternative use of the term, applying it to groups and movements organising according to or acting in a manner consistent with anarchist principles of decentralisation, voluntary association, mutual aid, the network model, and crucially, "the rejection of any idea that the end justifies the means, let alone that the business of a revolutionary is to seize state power and then begin imposing one's vision at the point of a gun." Graeber and Grubacic do not offer a comprehensive list of groups within this rubric, but suggest that it includes the likes of autonomism, Zapatismo and radical democracy. It should be stressed that many of these groups do not describe themselves as "anarchist", perhaps deliberately, and are grouped instead on the basis of what they do, implying that the criteria for inclusion are similar to those articulated by Neal.
It is unclear how far the term has been picked up by the wider anarchist movement, but it does help to clarify and begin to explain some of the conflicts and disagreements within contemporary anarchism.
Unsorted sections
Many of these sections down here can be merged into preceding sections, esp. the "conflict" discussions. Much can be deleted as it is redundant.
Conceptions of an anarchist society
See also: Anarchism and Society
Many political philosophers justify support of the state as a means of regulating violence, so that the destruction caused by human conflict is minimized and fair relationships are established. Anarchists argue that pursuit of these ends does not justify the establishment of a state, and in fact many argue that the state is incompatible with those goals. Anarchists argue that the state helps to create a monopoly on violence, and uses force and violence to expand and protect elite interests. Much effort has been dedicated to explaining how anarchist societies would handle criminality.
Pacifism
Some anarchists consider Pacifism (opposition to war) to be inherent in their philosophy. Some anarchists take it further and follow Leo Tolstoy's belief in non-violence (note, however, that these anarcho-pacifists are not necessarily Christian anarchists as Tolstoy was), advocating non-violent resistance as the only method of achieving a truly anarchist revolution.
Anarchist literature often portrays war as an activity in which the state seeks to gain and consolidate power, both domestically and in foreign lands. Many anarchists subscribe to Randolph Bourne's view that "war is the health of the state". Anarchists believe that if they were to support a war they would be strengthening the state — indeed, Peter Kropotkin was alienated from other anarchists when he expressed support for the British in World War I.
Just as they are critical and distrustful of most government endeavours, anarchists often view the stated reasons for war with a cynical eye. Since the Vietnam War protests in North America and, most recently, the protests against the war in Iraq, much anarchist activity has been anti-war based.
Many anarchists in the current movement however, reject complete pacifism, (although groups like Earth First!, and Food Not Bombs are based on principles of non-violence), and instead are in favor of self-defense, and sometimes violence against oppressive and authoritarian forces which they in fact also consider as defensive violence. Anarchists are skeptical however of winning a direct armed conflict with the state, and instead concern themselves mostly with organizing. Most anarchists however, do not consider the destruction of property to be violent, as do most activists who believe in non-violence.
Parliamentarianism
While most anarchists firmly oppose voting, or otherwise participating in the State institution, there are a few that disagree. Even hard-core anarchists (e.g. Proudhon) have succumbed to the temptation of electoral politics - and inevitably regretted it. Voluntaryism is a anarchist school of thought which emphasizes "tending your own garden" and "neither ballets nor bullets." The anarchist case against voting is explained in The Ethics of Voting by George H. Smith.
See also
- Anarchism and Marxism
- Anarchism and capitalism
- Anarchist symbolism
- Anarcho-punk
- Anarcho-Skinheads
- Punk ideology
- Libertarian Socialism
- Anarcho-syndicalism
- Black cat, for a symbol of anarchism
- Christian anarchism
- Equalism
- Crimethinc
- Earth First!
- Infoshop
- Individualist anarchism
- List of anarchist concepts
- List of anarchists
- List of anarchist organizations
- Anarchism and the arts
- Past and present anarchist communities
- Situationist
- Alternative society
- Syndicalism
- Temporary Autonomous Zone
- Free store
- Utopian Anarchism
Historical events
- Paris Commune (1871)
- Haymarket Riot (1886)
- Kronstadt rebellion (1921)
- Spanish Revolution (1936) (see Anarchism in Spain)
- May 1968, France (1968)
- WTO Meeting in Seattle (1999)
Books
- Alexander Berkman, What is Anarchism?, Prison Memoirs of an Anarchist, others
- Mikhail Bakunin, God and the State, The Paris Commune and the Idea of the State, others
- Emma Goldman, Anarchism and Other Essays, Living My Life, others
- Daniel Guérin, Anarchism
- Peter Kropotkin, Mutual Aid, The Conquest of Bread, others
- Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, What is Property?
- Rudolf Rocker, Anarcho-Syndicalism
- Voline, The Unknown Revolution
- Robert Paul Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism
- William Godwin, An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice
- Max Stirner, The Ego And Its Own Contractarian (as opposed to Natural Law or utilitarian) anarchism
- Leo Tolstoy, The Kingdom of God is Within You - Christian pacifist anarchism
- Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle
- Hakim Bey, Temporary Autonomous Zones Ontological anarchism
Anarchism by region/culture
External links
- Infoshop.org hosts Anarchist FAQ and Fake Anarchists and Libertarians
- Peter Kropotkin's article on anarchism for the 11th edition Encyclopedia Britannica (1911).
- Hundreds of anarchists are listed, with short bios, links & dedicated pages at the Daily Bleed's Anarchist Encyclopedia
- African Anarchism: The History of a Movement
- The Schism Between Individualist and Communist Anarchism
- Anarchoblogs Blogs by Anarchists.
- Anarchopedia intends to be an anarchist encyclopedia using the MediaWiki engine.
- Anarchy Archives extensively archives information relating to famous anarchists. This includes many of their books and other publications.
- Antflip.com | Anarchism Page A selection of websites, books, and online articles that explore social anarchism.
- International Workers Association (IWA-AIT)
- Melbourne Anarchist Archives 1966-1973
- "Jesus Is an Anarchist" by James Redford, October 30, 2005 (pdf), an article on the congruence of Jesus's biblical teachings and anarchism
- The Inefficient Utopia - an analysis of anarchist use of consensus, by the Curious George Brigade
- Jura Books (Sydney, Australia)
- Autonome
- Industrial Workers of the World
- IWW Retail Workers
- Crimethinc.com
- Crimethinc.net
- Towards an another anarchism by Andrej Grubacic at the World Social Forum
- ROAD Collective Ontario Anarchist Networking
Opposing views
- Objections to Anarchism Objections and rebuttals, from The Dandelion 1977-79
- Anarchist Direct Actions: A Challenge for Law Enforcement (pdf) is an article from a law enforcement perspective that includes a look at tactics, philosophy and a history of the Anarchist movement in the United States.
- American Liberal-Anarchism and Collectivist-Anarchism from The Conquest of Power by Marxist historian Albert Weisbord
- Collection of critical articles