Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:50, 13 December 2005

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

Example

User:BadUser

Three revert rule violation on Articlename (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

BadUser (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 18:46, November 28, 2005
• 1st revert: 14:32, 29 November 2005
• 2nd revert: 05:25, 30 November 2005
• 3rd revert: 05:42, 30 November 2005
• 4th revert: 06:01, 30 November 2005

Reported by: User:ReportingUser 14:46, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• User will not listen to the consensus of the other editors. User:ReportingUser 14:46, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Violations

User:Powo

Three revert rule violation on Computer science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

Powo (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 20:44, 12 December 2005
• 1st revert: 20:44, 12 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 14:49, 13 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 17:24, 13 December 2005
• 4th revert: 20:26, 13 December 2005

Reported by: — Dzonatas 21:50, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• has violated the three revert rule even when there is somewhat of a consensus on one version: 21:13, 11 December 2005
• has declared edits as vandalism, as if "gaming," that were clearly not vandalism, like deleted an entire section about careers: (and has been warned about WP:3RR)

• 1st: 14:14, 8 December 2005
• 2nd: 20:57, 8 December 2005
• 3rd: 22:32, 8 December 2005
• 4th: 16:19, 9 December 2005 Powo's summary: "reverted vandalism by Dzonatas"

• has shown attempts of character assasination in talk pages.
• has avoided questions in discussion and sequently reverted, instead. Powo suggests he doesn't need to explain.
• has been warned about WP:NOR for unsourced edits. — Dzonatas 21:50, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

User:152.91.9.124

Three revert rule violation on Pseudoscience (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 152.91.9.124 (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 21:21, 6 December 2005
• 1st revert: 21:56, 6 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 22:13, 6 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 23:12, 6 December 2005
• 4th revert: 23:23, 6 December 2005
• 5th revert: 23:36, 6 December 2005

Reported by: --Prosfilaes 06:38, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Has reverted edits by three other editors
• Blocked - sockpuppet of User:Countach who has also been blocked for 3rr of same article. Vsmith 14:41, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Chadbryant and User:RSPW Coaster

KTVX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - dig that edit history. Protected, added to WP:LAME and 24 hours each for really stupid 3RR violation - David Gerard 08:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Note: There's apparently been some sockpuppetry going on. I haven't time to look right now, but it might be severe enough to warrant investigation - David Gerard 08:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

• • Lame indeed.--Sean|Black 21:56, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

User:EaZyZ99 and sock User:69.245.221.209

Three revert rule violation on

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "3RRArchive9" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Female reproductive system (human)
Pictorial illustration of the female reproductive system and nearby organs
Details
Identifiers
Latin	systema genitale femininum
Anatomical terminology

The human female reproductive system is made up of the internal and external sex organs that function in the reproduction of new offspring. The reproductive system is immature at birth and develops at puberty to be able to release matured ova from the ovaries, facilitate their fertilization, and create a protective environment for the developing fetus during pregnancy. The female reproductive tract is made of several connected internal sex organs—the vagina, uterus, and fallopian tubes—and is prone to infections. The vagina allows for sexual intercourse, and is connected to the uterus at the cervix. The uterus (or womb) accommodates the embryo by developing the uterine lining.

The uterus also produces secretions which help the transit of sperm to the fallopian tubes, where sperm fertilize the ova. During the menstrual cycle, the ovaries release an ovum, which transits through the fallopian tube into the uterus. If an egg cell meets with sperm on its way to the uterus, a single sperm cell can enter and merge with it, creating a zygote. If no fertilization occurs, menstruation is the process by which the uterine lining is shed as blood, mucus, and tissue.

Fertilization usually occurs in the fallopian tubes and marks the beginning of embryogenesis. The zygote will then divide over enough generations of cells to form a blastocyst, which implants itself in the wall of the uterus. This begins the period of gestation and the embryo will continue to develop until full-term. When the fetus has developed enough to survive outside the uterus, the cervix dilates, and contractions of the uterus propel it through the birth canal (the vagina), where it becomes a newborn. The breasts are not part of the reproductive system, but mammary glands were essential to nourishing infants until the modern advent of infant formula.

Later in life, a woman goes through menopause and menstruation halts. The ovaries stop releasing eggs and the uterus stops preparing for pregnancy.

The external sex organs are also known as the genitals, and these are the organs of the vulva, including the labia, clitoris, and vestibule. The corresponding equivalent among males is the male reproductive system.

External genitalia

Vulva

The vulva is of all of the external parts and tissues and includes the following:

• Clitoris: an organ located at the top of the vulva. It consists of the body and its pea-shaped glans that is protected by the clitoral hood. The corpora cavernosa are tissues of the clitoris that aid in erection by filling with blood during sexual arousal.
• Labia: two types of vertical folds of skin called the labia majora (thick and large outer folds that protect other parts of the vulva) and the labia minora (thin and small inner folds that protect the vestibule from dryness, infections and irritation).
• Mons pubis: a mass of fatty tissue where the pubic hair grows.
• Vulval vestibule: an almond-shaped area between the labia minora that contains the openings.
• Urinary meatus: the opening of the urethra for urine to pass through.
• Vaginal opening: entrance to the vagina.
• Hymen: connective tissue that covers the vaginal opening.
• Vestibular gland openings: two pairs of openings in the vulval vestibule for the Bartholin's and Skene's glands.

Internal genitalia

Vagina

The vagina is a fibromuscular (made up of fibrous and muscular tissue) canal leading from the outside of the body to the cervix of the uterus. It is also referred to as the birth canal in the context of pregnancy. The vagina accommodates a penis during sexual intercourse. Semen containing spermatozoa is ejaculated from the penis at orgasm, into the vagina potentially enabling fertilization of the egg cell (ovum) to take place.

Cervix

The cervix is the neck of the uterus, the lower, narrow portion where it joins with the upper part of the vagina. It is cylindrical or conical in shape and protrudes through the upper anterior vaginal wall. Approximately half its length is visible, the remainder lies above the vagina beyond view. The vagina has a thick layer outside and it is the opening where the fetus emerges during delivery.

Uterus

The uterus or womb is the major female reproductive organ. The uterus provides mechanical protection, nutritional support, and waste removal for the developing embryo (weeks 1 to 8) and fetus (from week 9 until the delivery). In addition, contractions in the muscular wall of the uterus are important in pushing out the fetus at the time of birth.

The uterus contains three suspensory ligaments that help stabilize the position of the uterus and limits its range of movement. The uterosacral ligaments keep the body from moving inferiorly and anteriorly. The round ligaments restrict posterior movement of the uterus. The cardinal ligaments also prevent the inferior movement of the uterus.

The uterus is a pear-shaped muscular organ. Its major function is to accept a fertilized ovum, which becomes implanted into the endometrium, and derives nourishment from blood vessels, which develop exclusively for this purpose. The fertilized ovum becomes an embryo, develops into a fetus and gestates until childbirth. If the egg does not embed in the wall of the uterus, the female begins menstruation.

Fallopian tubes

The fallopian tubes are two tubes leading from the ovaries into the uterus. On maturity of an ovum, the follicle and the ovary's wall rupture, allowing the ovum to escape and enter the fallopian tube. There it travels toward the uterus, pushed along by movements of cilia on the inner lining of the tubes. This trip takes hours or days. If the ovum is fertilized while in the fallopian tube, then it normally implants in the endometrium when it reaches the uterus, which signals the beginning of pregnancy.

Ovaries

The ovaries are small, paired gonads located near the lateral walls of the pelvic cavity. These organs are responsible for the production of the egg cells (ova) and the secretion of hormones. The process by which the egg cell (ovum) is released is called ovulation. The speed of ovulation is periodic and impacts the length of a menstrual cycle.

After ovulation, the egg cell travels through the fallopian tube toward the uterus. If fertilization is going to occur, it often happens in the fallopian tube; the fertilized egg can then implant on the uterus's lining. During fertilization the egg cell plays a role; it releases certain molecules that are essential to guiding the sperm and allows the surface of the egg to attach to the sperm's surface. The egg can then absorb the sperm and fertilization can begin.

Vestibular glands

The vestibular glands, also known as the female accessory glands, are the Bartholin's glands, which produce a mucous fluid for vaginal lubrication, and the Skene's glands for the ejaculation of fluid as well as for lubricating the meatus.

Function

The female reproductive system functions to produce offspring.

In the absence of fertilization, the ovum will eventually traverse the entire reproductive tract from the fallopian tube until exiting the vagina through menstruation.

The reproductive tract can be used for various transluminal procedures such as fertiloscopy, intrauterine insemination, and transluminal sterilization.

Oocytes residing in the primordial follicle of the ovary are in a non-growing prophase arrested state, but are capable of highly efficient homologous recombinational repair of DNA damages including double-strand breaks. This capability allows genome integrity to be maintained and offspring health to be protected.

Development

Chromosome characteristics determine the genetic sex of a fetus at conception. This is specifically based on the 23rd pair of chromosomes that is inherited. Since the mother's egg contains an X chromosome and the father's sperm contains either an X or Y chromosome, it is the male who determines the fetus' sex. If the fetus inherits the X chromosome from the father, the fetus will be a female. In this case, testosterone is not made and the Wolffian duct will degrade thus, the Müllerian duct will develop into female sex organs. The clitoris is the remnants of the Wolffian duct. On the other hand, if the fetus inherits the Y chromosome from the father, the fetus will be a male. The presence of testosterone will stimulate the Wolffian duct, which will bring about the development of the male sex organs and the Müllerian duct will degrade.

Clinical significance

Vaginitis

Vaginitis is inflammation of the vagina and largely caused by an infection. It is the most common gynaecological condition presented. It is difficult to determine any one organism most responsible for vaginitis because it varies from range of age, sexual activity, and method of microbial identification. Vaginitis is not necessarily caused by a sexually transmitted infection as there are many infectious agents that make use of the close proximity to mucous membranes and secretions. Vaginitis is usually diagnosed based on the presence of vaginal discharge, which can have a certain color, odor, or quality.

Bacterial vaginosis

This is a vaginal infection in women. It differs from vaginitis in that there is no inflammation. Bacterial vaginosis is polymicrobial, consisting of many bacteria species. The diagnosis for bacterial vaginosis is made if three of the following four criteria are present: (1) Homogenous, thin discharge, (2) a pH of 4.5 in the vagina, (3) epithelial cells in the vagina with bacteria attached to them, or (4) a fishy odor. It has been associated with an increased risk of other genital tract infections such as endometritis.

Yeast infection

This is a common cause of vaginal irritation and according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at least 75% of adult women have experienced one at least once in their lifetime. Yeast infections are caused by an overgrowth of fungus in the vagina known as Candida. Yeast infections are usually caused by an imbalance of the pH in the vagina, which is usually acidic. Other factors such as pregnancy, diabetes, weakened immune systems, tight fitting clothing, or douching can also be a cause. Symptoms of yeast infections include itching, burning, irritation, and a white cottage-cheese-like discharge from the vagina. Women have also reported that they experience painful intercourse and urination as well. Taking a sample of the vaginal secretions and placing them under a microscope for evidence of yeast can diagnose a yeast infection. Treatment varies from creams that can be applied in or around the vaginal area to oral tablets that stop the growth of fungus.

Genital mutilation

There are many practices of mutilating female genitalia in different cultures. The most common two types of genital mutilation practiced are clitoridectomy, the circumcision of the clitoris and the excision of the clitoral prepuce. They can all involve a range of adverse health consequences such as bleeding, irreparable tissue damage, and sepsis, which can sometimes prove fatal.

Genital surgery

Genitoplasty refers to surgery that is carried out to repair damaged sex organs particularly following cancer and its treatment. There are also elective surgical procedures, which change the appearance of the external genitals.

Birth control

There are many types of birth control available to females. Birth control can be hormonal or physical in nature. Oral contraception can assist with management of various medical conditions, such as menorrhagia. However, oral contraceptives can have a variety of side effects, including depression.

Reproductive rights

The International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics was founded in 1954 to promote the well-being of women particularly in raising the standards of gynaecological practice and care. As of 2010, there were 124 countries involved.

Reproductive rights are legal rights related to reproduction and reproductive health. Women have the right to control matters involving their sexuality including their sexual and reproductive health. Violation of these rights include forced pregnancy, forced sterilization, forced abortion and genital mutilation. Female genital mutilation is the complete or partial removal of a female's external genitals.

History

It is claimed in the Hippocratic writings that both males and females contribute their seed to conception; otherwise, children would not resemble either or both of their parents. Four hundred years later, Galen identified the source of 'female semen' as the ovaries in female reproductive organs.

See also

• Conception
• Development of the reproductive system
• Evolution of sexual reproduction
• Female infertility
• Oogenesis
• Human sexuality § Female anatomy and reproductive system
• Orgasm § Females

References

1. Scoullar, Michelle J. L.; Boeuf, Philippe; Peach, Elizabeth (2021). "Mycoplasma genitalium and Other Reproductive Tract Infections in Pregnant Women, Papua New Guinea, 2015–2017 - Volume 27, Number 3—March 2021 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC". Emerging Infectious Diseases. 27 (3): 894–904. doi:10.3201/eid2703.201783. PMC 7920647. PMID 33622474. Archived from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
2. Ellis, Harold; Mahadevan, Vishy (2013). Clinical anatomy: applied anatomy for students and junior doctors (13th ed.). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-118-37376-7.
3. "Female Reproductive System: Structure & Function". Cleveland Clinic. Retrieved 2023-12-19.
4. "Genital Tract | SEER Training". training.seer.cancer.gov. Retrieved 2023-12-19.
5. "Fallopian Tubes: Location, Anatomy, Function & Conditions". Cleveland Clinic. Retrieved 2023-12-19.
6. "Female Reproductive System: Structure & Function". Cleveland Clinic. Retrieved 2023-12-19.
7. "Ovaries: Anatomy, Function, Hormones & Conditions". Cleveland Clinic. Retrieved 2023-12-19.
8. Alberts, Bruce; Johnson, Alexander; Lewis, Julian; Raff, Martin; Roberts, Keith; Walter, Peter (2002), "Fertilization", Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th edition, Garland Science, retrieved 2023-12-19
9. ^ Stringer JM, Winship A, Zerafa N, Wakefield M, Hutt K (May 2020). "Oocytes can efficiently repair DNA double-strand breaks to restore genetic integrity and protect offspring health". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117 (21): 11513–11522. doi:10.1073/pnas.2001124117. PMC 7260990. PMID 32381741.
10. "Details of genital development". Archived from the original on February 25, 2020. Retrieved August 6, 2010.
11. Egan ME, Lipsky MS (2000). "Diagnosis of Vaginitis". American Family Physician. 62 (5): 1095–104. PMID 10997533. Archived from the original on 6 June 2011. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
12. ^ Zaino, Richard J.; Robboy, Stanley J.; Bentley, Rex; Kurman, Robert J. (2011). "Diseases of the Vagina". Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract. pp. 105–154. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0489-8_3. ISBN 978-1-4419-0488-1.
13. Iyer, V; Farquhar, C; Jepson, R (2000). Iyer, Vadeihi (ed.). "Oral contraceptive pills for heavy menstrual bleeding". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD000154. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000154. PMID 10796696.
14. de Wit, AE; Booij, SH; Giltay, EJ; Joffe, H; Schoevers, RA; Oldehinkel, AJ (2020). "Association of Use of Oral Contraceptives With Depressive Symptoms Among Adolescents and Young Women". JAMA Psychiatry. 77 (1): 52–59. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2838. PMC 6777223. PMID 31577333.
15. Anwar, Etin. "The Transmission of Generative Self and Women's Contribution to Conception." Gender and Self in Islam. London: Routledge, 2006. 75. Print.

External links

• Female reproductive system Archived 2019-05-27 at the Wayback Machine
• Interactive diagram of female reproductive system

v t e Women's health
Reproductive health	Reproductive tract External female genitalia (vulva) Clitoris Clitoral hood Labia minora Labia majora Vagina Cervix Uterus Fallopian tube Ovary Reproductive system disease Maternal health Pregnancy Unintended pregnancy Gravidity and parity Obstetrics Antenatal care Adolescent pregnancy Complications of pregnancy Hyperemesis gravidarum Ectopic pregnancy Miscarriage Obstetrical bleeding Gestational diabetes Hypertension Preeclampsia Eclampsia Childbirth Midwifery Preterm birth Multiple births Oxytocin Obstructed labor Cesarian section Retained placenta Obstetrical fistulae Vesicovaginal fistula Rectovaginal fistula Episiotomy Husband stitch Postpartum care Postpartum confinement Maternal deaths Perinatal mortality Stillbirths Abortion Mother-to-child transmission Sterilization Compulsory sterilization Breastfeeding and mental health Reproductive life plan Infertility Childlessness Assisted reproductive technology In vitro fertilization Parenting Adoption Fostering Contraception and family planning Intrauterine devices Oral contraceptives Condoms Male contraceptive Contraceptive prevalence Contraceptive security Planned parenthood Fertility awareness Menstruation Culture and menstruation Feminine hygiene Menarche Menstrual cycle Menstrual aids Cloth menstrual pad Menstrual cup Tampon Sanitary pad Dysmenorrhea Menorrhagia Amenorrhoea Menopause Hormone replacement therapy
Sexual health	Sexually transmitted infections Safe sex HIV Human papilloma virus HPV vaccine Pelvic inflammatory disease Female genital mutilation Clitoridectomy Infibulation Breast binding Breast health Breast ironing Child marriage Dyspareunia Forced marriage Gynaecological disorders Vaginitis Leblouh Polygamy Sexual intercourse Orgasm Puberty Sex differences Sex education
Non-reproductive health	Violence against women Abuse during childbirth Domestic violence Pregnancy Intimate partner violence Misogyny Sexual harassment Sexual assault Rape Femicide Gender discrimination Non-communicable diseases Cancer Lung cancer Breast cancer Uterine cancer Endometrial cancer Cervical cancer Papanicolaou test Ovarian cancer Cardiovascular disease Dementia Alzheimer's disease Bone health Osteoporosis Hip fracture Anaemia Mental health Anxiety Depression Major depressive disorder Urinary tract Urethra Urinary tract infection Urinary incontinence
Sociocultural factors	Poverty Disadvantaged Gender equality Healthcare inequality Gender disparities in health Social determinants of health Reproductive justice Women's empowerment
Politics, research and advocacy	United Nations The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women Declaration on the elimination of violence against women International Day of the Girl Child Commission on the Status of Women UN Women United States Office of Research on Women's Health Women's Health Initiative International Center for Research on Women Nurses' Health Study Black Women's Health Study Cartwright Inquiry Society for Women's Health Research
Women's health by country	China Ethiopia India Family planning Russia Birth control in the United States
Category Commons WikiProject

. EaZyZ99 (talk · contribs) and 69.245.221.209 (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 16:08, 5 December 2005
• 1st revert: 03:03, 8 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 03:06, 8 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 04:13, 8 December 2005
• 4th revert: 04:15, 8 December 2005
• 5th revert: 04:21, 8 December 2005

Reported by: Nandesuka 04:35, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• User:EaZyZ99 seems to be obsessed with inserting an alleged self-picture of his or her shaved vulva into the Vulva article. S/he has edited under the IP address User:69.245.221.209 in an attempt to avoid 3RR enforcement. I'd block them myself, but since I have been involved in this recent series of reverts, I decided it was more conservative to simply report them here and let other admins make the call. Nandesuka 04:35, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Blocked user and IP sock for 24 hr. Vsmith 14:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Ghirlandajo

Three revert rule violation on Katyń massacre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Ghirlandajo (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 09:13, 7 December 2005 - this is wrong
• 1st revert: 03:18, 8 December 2005 Ghirlandajo
• 2nd revert: 05:12, 8 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 06:21, 8 December 2005
• 4th revert: 06:41, 8 December 2005

Reported by: --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 13:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• As I can be considered a party to this dispute, I don't want to block him myself. Besides, I am not an expert in judging how serious a 3RR violation is. I'd recommend a short block (about 3h, perhaps) meant to cool him down and realize that further breaking of 3RR is not wise.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 13:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Nonsense. The first edit was not a revert but contribution of new stuff which never appeared in the article before. The fourth edit was completely out of line with the previous ones and was intended to fend off a dubious comment by a stray editor. So it makes two reverts instead of four. Even if someone thinks that techinically it is a 3RR violation, it was not intended to spawn edit wars and I have no intention to edit the page any more either today or in the nearest future. --Ghirlandajo 14:01, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

There were no 3RR violation here. Please do not waste other people's time to report the 3RR that were not. That said, I take no position at the article's content dispute. --Irpen 15:26, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

I rechecked and I stand by my statement that there was no 3RR violation here. --Irpen 21:25, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

In that case I apologise. It was the first 3RR I have ever reported and I guess I was somewhat unclear on reverts versus edit. Ghirlandajo insterted specific information four times, but I see now that the first insertion does not count as a revert. Still this doesn't change the fact that it would be beneficial if some neutral party would warn him that his actions (revets) are not the best choice he could have made.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 22:56, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Halibutt

Three revert rule violation on Battle of Wołodarka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Halibutt (talk · contribs):

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

If Piotrus resorts to such dirty tricks as above to further his recent anti-Ghirlandajo quest, I may point out that his friend Halibutt violated 3RR more than once in my experience of conversing with him. Every time he went unpunished. It's time to put an end to such an impunity. --Ghirlandajo 14:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Please report current violations, not two month old histories. Vsmith 14:22, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

While Ghirlandajo's late reporting seems a bit close to proving a point, he is right to point out that quite often a double standard is being applied about 3RR violations. --Thorsten1 15:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Not every 3RR violation is reported and of these reported not every is "punished". This is left to administrator's discretion. It's not a question of double standards. --Wojsyl 18:03, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

This old 3RR violation was unpunished because I chose not to report it at that time as a courtesy to the editor, that's all. Unfortunately, it had little effect on the future editing of this article but that statute of limitations on that one is probably indeed expired. --Irpen 21:33, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

User:193.170.48.178

Three revert rule violation on September 11, 2001 attacks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 193.170.48.178 (talk · contribs):

• At least 16 reverts: Special:Contributions/193.170.48.178 | http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=September_11%2C_2001_attacks&action=history

Reported by: User:Chaosfeary

Comments:

User:Anna2005

Three revert rule violation on Freemasonry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Anna2005 (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: Not sure. Looks like he cut-and-pasted his preferred sections in, rather than doing a wholesale revert as such.
• 1st revert: 08:22
• 2nd revert: 10:50
• 3rd revert: 11:31
• 4th revert: 11:41
• 5th revert: 11:59

Reported by: SarekOfVulcan 20:03, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Suspected sockpuppet of User:Lightbringer, who is indefinitely banned from editing Freemasonry-related topics.

• Blocked indef. Recycling exact content User:Lightbringer used to insert -- reverted Freemasonry and its talk page in a ridiculous manner. .:.Jareth.:. 20:13, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

User:71.243.235.8

Three revert rule violation on Debra Lafave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 71.243.235.8 (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 06:36, December 3, 2005
• 1st revert: 17:20, December 8, 2005
• 2nd revert: 17:25, December 8, 2005
• 3rd revert: 17:32, December 8, 2005
• 4th revert: 18:01, December 8, 2005

Reported by: Locke Cole 02:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• I believe this is a sockpuppet of MagnaVox, who has been blocked twice already for violating WP:3RR over this same edit (inserting the Yahoo! group link). In any event he has been warned of WP:3RR on both his talk page and on my final revert before his 4th revert. Also note that he vandalized the article on this 4th revert, removing content under the claim of copyright (which is false). —Locke Cole 02:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
  • I concur with this analysis, given that it is the exact same spam link. I've blocked this IP address for a week. If other admins think this is too much, feel free to reduce the block. Nandesuka 02:47, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Thanks. =) I've flagged a few IPs he's used in the recent past with {{sockpuppet}} and created Category:Misplaced Pages:Suspected sockpuppets of MagnaVox. So far he's only used his account and two IP addresses (both from *.tampfl.fios.verizon.net), but this could change. —Locke Cole 03:23, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

User:82.13.187.127

3RR violation on Racism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). User's entire edit history today (but one) consists of five reverts of the same sentence in this article.

Reported by Mwanner | Talk 20:46, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Comment: There are other instances of the same edit from a similar anon IP (User:82.13.187.155) going back to Dec 6.

User:165.247.214.230

Three revert rule violation on Winter Soldier Investigation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

• Previous version reverted to: 19:18, December 5, 2005
• 1st revert: 13:18, December 9, 2005
• 2nd revert: 16:16, December 9, 2005
• 3rd revert: 16:38, December 9, 2005
• 4th revert: 17:46, December 9, 2005

Reported by: TDC 22:58, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Although the subject of an ongoing RfArb, the anon earthlink user continually violates the 3RR. . TDC 22:58, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

User:80.126.178.93, User:80.126.178.94, and User:Cb3rob

3RR] violations on CyberBunker. zetawoof (talk · contribs):

• Previous version:
• First blanking as *.94:
• Second blanking and page move as Cb3rob:
• Third blanking as *.93:
• Fourth blanking as *.93:
• Fifth blanking as *.94:
• Sixth blanking as Cb3rob:

Comments: *.93, *.94, and Cb3rob are almost certainly all the same user.

User:Luxiake

Three revert rule violation on GNU-Darwin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

• Previous version reverted to: 20:55, 9 December 2005
• 1st revert: 09:12, 10 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 09:55, 10 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 10:12, 10 December 2005
• 4th revert: 11:40, 10 December 2005

Reported by: AlistairMcMillan 12:06, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Continually reverting against consensus on the Talk page. AlistairMcMillan 12:06, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Csssclll

Three revert rule violation on Arabic Numerals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Csssclll (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to:
• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

Reported by --Astriolok 14:29, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Andries

Three revert rule violation on Criticism of Prem Rawat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Andries (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to:
• 1st revert to material deleted in October:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

Reported by: ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 17:11, 10 December 2005 (UTC) Comments:

• The first two are not reverts within 24 hours, but restoring information that was deleted long ago. I made exactly the same number of reverts as user:Jossifresco (that is three) who by the way is a follower of Prem Rawat. I also like the other admins to take a look at the content that user:Jossifresco insists on deleting. The contents is attributed referenced from notable sources. Andries 17:23, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
• My allegiance to Prem Rawat is openly stated on my user page. In the spirit of disclosure, please also note that Andries is a vocal critic of Prem Rawat, colludes with a small group of critics to push their POV in Misplaced Pages articles. Andries is an ex-follower of Satya Sai Baba and a self-declared POV pusher , and avdocate against gurus . ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 17:34, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
• Please note that the last and only time that I was blocked from Misplaced Pages was on the same subject i.e. Prem Rawat in a dispute with the same person, User:Jossifresco. And the person who blocked me, user:Geni, started editing the article as proposed by me and disputed by user:Jossifresco on the talk page. (moving stuff to Wikiquote). I would love to be blocked again in such a way. Andries 19:08, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
• The article in question has now been blocked due to ongoing revert wars by opposing factions, but not by me anymore. The problem is that there is nothing to discuss anymore. Everything has been discussed ad nauseam and factions continue to disagree. Dispute resolutions have not helped either. Andries 22:06, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

User:DrBat

Three revert rule violation on Zatanna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). DrBat (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 02:20, 10 December 2005
• 1st revert: 05:07, 10 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 13:24, 10 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 14:13, 10 December 2005
• 4th revert: 14:27, 10 December 2005
• 5th revert: 15:48, 10 December 2005
• 6th revert: 16:11, 10 December 2005
• 7th revert: 18:21, 10 December 2005 (partial, box image only)

Reported by: SoM 18:48, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• See also #User:65.98.21.69 below

Dr Bat blocked for 24 hours. SlimVirgin 19:18, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

User:65.98.21.69

Three revert rule violation on Zatanna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 65.98.21.69 (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 04:49, 9 December 2005
• 1st revert: 02:35, 10 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 12:33, 10 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 13:59, 10 December 2005
• 4th revert: 14:20, 10 December 2005
• 5th revert: 15:44, 10 December 2005
• 6th revert: 15:51, 10 December 2005

Reported by:

Comments:

• See also #User:DrBat above

Blocked for 24 hours. SlimVirgin 19:22, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

User:24.147.103.146

Three revert rule violation on Jimmy Flynn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 24.147.103.146 (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to:
• 1st revert: 11:05, December 10, 2005
• 2nd revert: 11:19, December 10, 2005
• 3rd revert: 12:48, December 10, 2005
• 4th revert: 13:51, December 10, 2005

Reported by: Mwanner | Talk 19:16, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• User is trying to get rid of a PD image that he imagines he holds copyright to 'cause it's on his website (among others)
  • He didn't strictly revert the page four times, and Since the warnings he received at 19:10 he has not persisted in his behavior. I will watch him for further violations, and to see if he persues his copyright claim through the appropriate channels he has been advised of, but don't recommend further action now. -- SCZenz 19:27, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

SCZenz, I've just blocked him for 24 hours. If you disagree, I'll be fine if you undo it. I blocked before I saw your message. SlimVirgin 19:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

I recognize this was a judgement call and appreciate your willingness to accept an unblock, which I will in fact do now. My logic (as above) is that he didn't continue to edit Jimmy Flinn after his recent round of warnings. However, I'll leave another message on his talk page and warn that the next blanking, image removal, or copyright info removal he does outside of process will result in a block. -- SCZenz 19:34, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

That sounds fair. SlimVirgin 19:38, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

I've blocked him 48 hours for continued page blanking after clear warnings. -- SCZenz 22:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Zero0000

Three revert rule violation on Riots in Palestine of 1929.

Initial state of the article : http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Riots_in_Palestine_of_1929&oldid=29897058

An editor user:Zeq added the words "Ethnic Cleansing" in

Zero has repeadly delted those words:

1st: 10:20 on Dec 10

2nd:

3rd:

4th: 05:19 On Dec 11

Comments:

This is user:Zero0000 2nd violation in short time in editing aricles abou the history Of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. He was able to talk his way out of the first one (not sure as it was an obvious violation with 5 times) :

The discussion about these edit was on a diffrenet page Talk:Hebron_massacre as this page is a disambiguation page refering those who search for Hebron massacre to: Riots in Palestine of 1929 Reported by Zeq 07:32, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Reply:

Zeq has still not learned what a revert is. The first edit was not a revert but a rephrasing of new text in a form that had not existed before. That is, it was a perfectly normal edit. --Zero 08:37, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

This is true, but it would probably be wiser to discuss your edits instead of reverting even just three times, or attempt a compromise. Edit wars are lame, okay?--Sean|Black 08:49, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Reply to the "reply:" Again Zero tries to talk his way out of a 3RR revert. The deletion of the word "ethnic cleansing" is a clear revert: The word was not there, it was inserted by another editor (me) and Zero Deleted it 4 times. The diff s are very clear. This is his 2nd violaion in short time. Zeq 08:50, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

No. A revert is an edit that goes back to a previous version of the article. Zero has not done that over three times.--Sean|Black 08:52, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

No. This is not what Revert is (but you are making a common misconception) Here is quote: "This (rule) states that if we revert to a previous version of a page (in whole or in part, which can mean as little as one word in some circumstances), we may be blocked from editing for up to 24 hours. See Misplaced Pages:Three revert rule for more details. SlimVirgin (talk) 20:42, 4 October 2005 (UTC) " Zeq 09:30, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Indeed, if a revert combined with an edit is not a revert, it would mean that the 3RR may be easily circumvented by combining reverts with edits. Can anyone clear this matter out please? --Heptor 20:42, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

PS: I don't think Zero should actually be blocked for 24 hours, as WP:3RR#Enforcement may suggest, it would be too far-fetched, but it should be made clear that such behavior is not permitted on Misplaced Pages. --Heptor 20:53, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm not blocking him (he stopped), but my point was that the first "revert" was Zero refactoring new text, which is not a revert. He then reverted to that version three times.--Sean|Black 00:28, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

I reviewed the first edit in question again, I am no longer sure if it may be counted as a revert myself... Certainly a borderline case, but not a clear revert. --Heptor 02:09, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Ian Pitchford

Three revert rule violation on 1948 Arab-Israeli War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Ian Pitchford (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 22:11, 7 December 2005
• 1st revert: 17:08, 11 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 17:14, 11 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 17:20, 11 December 2005
• 4th revert: Current version

Reported by: --Heptor 17:48, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

There is an ongoing dispute over the content of that article. Ian Pitchford threatened to submit the matter to the Arb Com for a while now (but didn't ), and even asked Jimbo Wales to intervene.

There was an offer for a compromise (after Ian trying to force his way) he never answered that offer. On the other hand all his requestes from others to provide souce were answered. After doing his 4th revert he requestd page protection (and got it) so now the page is exactly how he wanted it. Zeq 19:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

User:KDRGibby

Repeatedly trying to insert a section in article Communism disputed by others (see Talk:Communism): , , , , then violating WP:POINT when upset in order to try to prove a point to include his section: , , , , , , , , . -- Natalinasmpf 19:19, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Anything going to be done about this? -- Natalinasmpf 00:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

User:DrBat again

Three revert rule violation on Zatanna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). DrBat (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 2005-12-10 21:11:38
• 1st revert: 2005-12-12 02:19:38
• 2nd revert: 2005-12-12 02:24:51
• 3rd revert: 2005-12-12 02:32:19
• 4th revert: 2005-12-12 02:47:33
• 5+ reverts from then on (in one day)

Reported by: --Red-skinned femme-fatale black-latex-clad b-tch from Hell 02:58, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Previously blocked for 3RR on the same article, see this page, up above: Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR#User:DrBat

Note that there is a message on his talk page saying he is blocked, but this is from his previous 3RR breaking and not from this one he is happily ignoring 3RR at the moment

Please can you revert his revert that's breaking 3RR as I cannot because I am abiding by 3RR? Otherwise he just wins and so has profited from ignoring 3RR and will just do it again...

"more coming soon" - Will anything be done about this? also see Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#DrBat ban evading as 200.162.245.104 and Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration#User:_DrBat_--_continuing_breaches_of_previous_ArbCom_ruling

What is your problem???

Those edits were made because you kept on reverting my edits and accusing me of being another IP address. You've been registered for two days, and almost all your edits are you out to get me.

I'll just repaste my previous comment to you concerning the 'dodging ban bit' from the Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents of the same topic:

The mentioned user (who you think I am) once changed the cover of Catwoman #1 (which I uploaded) to #46 (a hughes picture which I didn't want, and reverted). You can also check out the Catwoman article and talk page to see how I was adamant in not having Hughes images, and having the first issue of the new volume. Then why would I make an edit removing the #1 image and replace it with one of the Hughes images? Do I suffer from multiple personality disorder or something? And why would I even try evading the ban in the first place if it was for only 24 hours? That's like a guy being in jail for a week, escaping, and being put back for a year. Common sense. --DrBat 03:16, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Zen-master

Three revert rule violation on Conspiracy theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Zen-master (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 19:11, 10 December 2005
• 1st revert: 17:05, 11 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 21:44, 11 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 05:10, 12 December 2005
• 4th revert: 05:43, 12 December 2005

Reported by: Jayjg 05:51, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Has been blocked for 3RR many times before, including on this article. As the diffs show, is not even using complex reverts any more, but simply reverting to identical previous versions of the article. Jayjg 05:51, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
• Spoke to soon, he's followed up his 4 simple reverts with a complex revert: . Jayjg 15:34, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

• Blocked for 24 hours. Carbonite | Talk 15:41, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
• 24 hours is too soft here, he's done this before at this article, and at other articles according to the arbcom's findings. I'm blocking for 48 hours. karmafist 17:03, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Adraeus

I've violated the 3RR attempting to protect Template:Infobox Company from incompetent and vandalistic editing that negatively affects a widely used template. The editor, User:Netoholic, claims to be attempting to "fix" the structure of the template per policy; however, his edits are destroying the template's formatting. I request administrative action. Thank you. Signing off. Adraeus 07:01, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Three revert rule violation on Template:Infobox Company (edit | ] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (Template talk:Infobox Company). Adraeus (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to:
• 1st revert: 13:20, 11 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 22:19, 11 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 22:42, 11 December 2005
• 4th revert: 22:54, 11 December 2005
• 5th revert: 23:15, 11 December 2005 Adraeus 07:18, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments

• Well, to make it official, I added the links above. These are four straight-up reversions - very angry reversions at that. To say I was committing vandalism is laughable. It seems that the fuss was all about some exceedingly minor formatting, which I offered to fix if he had just calmly described it. -- Netoholic @ 07:10, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

  My talk page demonstrates that you are aware of the problems you've caused by "fixing" the structure of the template. Have you remedied these problems? No. You've simply persisted to commit the same changes without preserving the template's formatting. You are knowingly negatively editing a popular template. You are committing vandalism. Adraeus 07:18, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

  My edits were to correct the poor formatting I saw (bad wikitable mark-up, excessive whitespace, and failure to adhere to WP:AUM). The template worked perfectly and looked better after each of my edits. Too bad you broke 3RR before you even told me what you thought was wrong with my version, which turns out to be a difference of inconsequential formatting. -- Netoholic @ 07:30, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

It doesn't matter why you edit warred. We have ways of dealing with that. Take it to WP:DR. Your incivility here and in the edit summaries is also unacceptable, and this seems to be a pattern. Just don't. Blocked for 24 hours. Dmcdevit·t 07:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

On a related note, I've blocked Netoholic for 24 hours for violating his Template namespace ban and revert restrictions. Ral315 (talk) 15:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

User:200.162.245.104

Three revert rule violation on Zatanna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 200.162.245.104 (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 18:21, 10 December 2005
• 1st revert: 14:03, 12 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 14:48, 12 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 15:30, 12 December 2005
• 4th revert: 16:21, 12 December 2005
• 5th revert: 18:19, 12 December 2005

Reported by: SoM 18:27, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Note also the edit-summary comments. This page is fast becoming a disaster (See also #User:DrBat again above.) - SoM 18:34, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
• Assuming that there's no evidence that this is someone's sockpuppet, then this user wasn't warned and should not be blocked. User has now been warned. — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 19:25, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Red-skinned femme-fatale black-latex-clad b-tch from Hell

Three revert rule violation on Zatanna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Red-skinned femme-fatale black-latex-clad b-tch from Hell (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Zatanna&oldid=30954745
• 1st revert: 02:16, 12 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 02:22, 12 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 02:27, 12 December 2005
• 4th revert: 14:07, 12 December 2005
• 5th revert: 14:22, 12 December 2005

Reported by: SoM 18:33, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• See comments for the anon #User:200.162.245.104 above.
• Blocked for 48 hours: 24 for the violation after sufficient warning; 24 for offensive insults directed at another user. — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 19:23, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Delonnette

Three revert rule violation on Michelle Ryan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

Delonnette (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 21:14, 12 December 2005
• 1st revert: 21:15, 12 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 21:25, 12 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 21:31, 12 December 2005
• 4th revert: 21:38, 12 December 2005

Reported by: Extraordinary Machine 22:01, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• User has uploaded a string of images with no source or copyright information and continues to insert them into articles unformatted, despite being asked not to do so by more than one editor (some of them have been deleted already). In this case, he/she uploaded the exact same image (albeit under different filenames) more than once and added it to the Michelle Ryan article; the fourth time was after he/she had been informed of the 3RR. Extraordinary Machine 22:01, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
• Already blocked for vandalism and ignoring copyright. Jtkiefer ---- 00:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Leifern

Three revert rule violation on Homeopathy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Leifern (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 01:17, 12 December 2005
• 1st revert: 06:37, 12 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 14:56, 12 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 17:49, 12 December 2005
• 4th revert: 18:02, 12 December 2005
• 5th revert: 18:11, 12 December 2005
• 6th revert: 18:24, 12 December 2005

Reported by: Skinwalker (talk · contribs)

Comments:

• User has a lot of general incivility on this article, keeps trying to delete material critical of the subject.

Absolutely false allegation. I took great care not to do such reverts. This is abusive. --Leifern 00:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

• I have blocked both User:Leifern and User:Jooler for 24 hours for violation of WP:3RR Jtkiefer ---- 00:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Flying fox

Three revert rule violation on 2005 Sydney Race Riots (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

Flying fox (talk · contribs):

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

Reported by: --Elliskev 03:08, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Refers to his reversions as fixing vandalism by me and my cabal. I'm not even involved. I guess he just picked my name from the talk page --Elliskev 03:08, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Freestylefrappe

Three revert rule violation on Kumanovo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Freestylefrappe (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 18:00, December 7, 2005
• 1st revert: 17:28, 12 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 22:32, 12 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 00:39, 13 December 2005
• 4th revert: 02:38, 13 December 2005

Reported by:karmafist 03:09, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments: Freestylefrappe (talk · contribs) seems to be reverting back to an earlier version of Kumanovo with some fairly nasty edit summaries, and also blocked one of the people he was having issues with regarding the article earlier.

• Blocked for 24 hours. An admin should know better. — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 14:19, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

User:69.245.221.209 (sockpuppet of User:EaZyZ99)

Three revert rule violation on Vulva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 69.245.221.209 (talk · contribs) and EaZyZ99 (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 17:18, December 11, 2005
• 1st revert: 20:18, December 11, 2005 (as EaZyZ99 (talk · contribs))
• 2nd revert: 18:36, December 12, 2005
• 3rd revert: 19:30, December 12, 2005
• 4th revert: 19:42, December 12, 2005

Reported by: —Locke Cole 04:01, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• User is posting from his sockpuppet IP address to evade WP:3RR. Proof of sockpuppetry can be acquired from this diff. User has been warned of 3RR before, and user has been blocked before. —Locke Cole 04:01, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

===User:Absent=== (troll) Three revert rule violation on Beslan school hostage crisis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Absent (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to:
• 1st revert: (not part of the 3RR, due to time)
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:
• 5th revert:

Reported by: Sherurcij

Comments:

• Is ignoring talk page, saying that Muslims do not deserve NPOV, and arguing that all Chechens are Jihadists User:Absent is a highly biased userpage, and he clearly states in each of his WP contributions that he hates Islam, and is trying to advance his agenda. Wouldn't mind seeing him blocked, since he hasn't yet contributed a single word that hasn't been reverted as vandalism.

User:DocOck

Three revert rule violation on Kate Beckinsale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). DockOck (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 16:05, December 13, 2005
• 1st revert: 16:08, December 13, 2005
• 2nd revert: 16:10, December 13, 2005
• 3rd revert: 16:14, December 13, 2005
• 4th revert: 16:19, December 13, 2005
• 5th revert:16:53, December 13, 2005

Reported by: --Yamla 17:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments: Informed user about 3RR. User read the comments and then went and performed 5th revert. --Yamla 17:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Where did the informing happen? Jkelly 17:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

I don't see where the problem is. For whatever reason user Stanley Ipkiss reverted my changes (and he also broke the 3 revert rule though it seems he goes unpunished). He finally saw my source for the changes and agreed to leave the article in my version. Yamla reverted it on principal despite the fact that there is no longer a conflict. I informed her of this and reverted it back to my (the agreed and verified) version. That's the story. DocOck 17:45, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

I have left messages at User talk:DocOck and User talk:Stanley Ipkiss. If the situation isn't resolved, let us know. Jkelly 17:56, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

User:67.186.196.85

Three revert rule violation on 1.800.Vending (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 67.186.196.85 (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 21:57 12 December 2005
• 1st revert: 22:24 12 December 2005
• 2nd revert: 22:41 12 December 2005
• 3rd revert: 23:03 12 December 2005
• 4th revert: 09:03 13 December 2005

Reported by: SarekOfVulcan 17:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Possibly the same as User:Alaska1050?

User:Moveapage

Three revert rule violation on Republic of China (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Moveapage (talk · contribs):

• Previous version reverted to: 10:37, 13 December 2005 (PST)
• 1st revert: 10:50, 13 December 2005(PST)
• 2nd revert: 10:57, 13 December 2005(PST)
• 3rd revert: 11:13, 13 December 2005(PST)
• 4th revert: 11:24, 13 December 2005(PST)
• 5th revert: 11:46, 13 December 2005(PST)
• 6th revert: 12:03, 13 December 2005(PST)

Reported by: Jiang 19:35, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• User:Moveapage, who despite having few edits, is well aware of the 3RR and has engaged in wholesale reverts of my edits there, without answering to my reasons at Talk:Republic_of_China#Lead_section_edits for making such edits. Specifically, Moveapage has reverted 4 times every single change I made to the lead section here except for the removal of "on both sides of the Taiwan Strait", linking of warlordism, and shortening of "Republic of China (ROC)" to ROC.--Jiang 19:35, 13 December 2005 (UTC) The 5th revert reverted everything except the removal of "and one of the original five Security Council members" and made some modifications to the second and third sentences --Jiang 19:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC) 5th and 6th reverts are identical. --Jiang 20:06, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

These aren't just reverts and one should also note Jiang reverted me first before I removed his controversial insertions. Those exceptions that Jiang talks about is me compromising where it made sense, but leaving out what is too controversial to just leave in there without Jiang obtaining consensus first. Several of Jiang's insertions were brought up on the talk page but since consensus has not been obtained, I do not see why he should be able to just go ahead an insert. I enourage those concerned to take a look at subtance of the talk and the evolution of the edits. There is no knee-jerk reverting going on here, except by Blueshirts, who by his own user page appears to be quite partisan.Moveapage 20:28, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

To report a new violation

Place new reports **ABOVE** this header, using the template below. Do NOT edit the template itself. See the example at the top of the page for full details. Take the time to do the job right to get the quickest responses. Use diffs, not versions, and the "compare versions" button!

===]===
] violation on {{Article|ARTICLENAME}}. {{User|USERNAME}}: 
* Previous version reverted to: 
* 1st revert: 
* 2nd revert: 
* 3rd revert: 
* 4th revert: 
Reported by:
'''Comments:'''
*

• Human female reproductive system