Misplaced Pages

Arkansas v. Sanders

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

1979 United States Supreme Court case
Arkansas v. Sanders
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued February 27, 1979
Decided June 20, 1979
Full case nameArkansas v. Sanders
Citations442 U.S. 753 (more)99 S. Ct. 2586; 61 L. Ed. 2d 235
Case history
PriorSanders v. State, 262 Ark. 595, 559 S.W.2d 704 (1977); cert. granted, 439 U.S. 891 (1978).
Holding
Absent exigency, the warrantless search of personal luggage merely because it was located in an automobile lawfully stopped by the police is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun · Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist · John P. Stevens
Case opinions
MajorityPowell, joined by Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall
ConcurrenceBurger, joined by Stevens
DissentBlackmun, joined by Rehnquist
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. IV
Overruled by
California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991)

Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that, absent exigency, the warrantless search of personal luggage merely because it was located in an automobile lawfully stopped by the police, is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception. Similar to United States v. Chadwick (1977), the luggage was the subject of police suspicion before being placed in the vehicle.

Sanders resolved two distinct lines of cases: on the one hand, Carroll v. United States (1925) laid down the automobile exception which allowed for warrantless searches of automobiles; on the other hand, Chadwick did not allow for a warrantless search of luggage. Sanders declined to extend the automobile exception here, again stressing, as in Chadwick, the heightened expectation of privacy in one's luggage.

See also

External links

United States Fourth Amendment case law
Scope of the Fourth Amendment
Definition of search
Open-fields doctrine
Aerial surveillance
Third-party doctrine
Definition of seizure
Fourth Amendment standing
Probable cause
Reasonable suspicion: Investigative detentions and frisks
Warrant requirement
Mere evidence rule
Neutral and detached magistrate
Warrants directed at third parties
Knock-and-announce
Exceptions to warrant requirement
Exigent circumstances
Consent searches
Plain view
Vehicle searches
Searches incident to arrest
Breathalyzers, blood samples, DNA
Protective sweeps
Inventory searches
Border searches
Checkpoints
Students, employees, and patients
Property of probationers and parolees
Administrative inspections
Searches in jails and prisons
Warrantless arrests
Seizures
Distinguishing stops and arrests
Seizure of premises awaiting warrant
Detention incident to search
Detention during vehicle stop
Excessive force
Remedies
Exclusionary rule
Origins
Impeachment exception
Good-faith exception
Independent source
Inevitable discovery
Attenuation
No-knock searches
Habeas corpus review
Civil suit
Federal
State
Incorporation against States
Unreasonable search and seizure
Warrant requirements
Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: