Misplaced Pages

Burch v. Louisiana

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

1979 United States Supreme Court case
Burch v. Louisiana
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued February 22, 1979
Decided April 17, 1979
Full case nameBurch v. Louisiana
Citations441 U.S. 130 (more)99 S. Ct. 1623; 60 L. Ed. 2d 96; 1979 U.S. LEXIS 87
Case history
PriorState v. Wrestle, Inc., 360 So. 2d 831 (La. 1978); cert. granted, 439 U.S. 925 (1978).
Holding
A conviction by a nonunanimous six-person jury in a state criminal trial for a nonpetty offense violates the right of an accused to trial by jury guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun · Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist · John P. Stevens
Case opinions
MajorityRehnquist, joined by Burger, White, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens
ConcurrenceStevens
Concur/dissentBrennan, joined by Stewart, Marshall
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. VI XIV

Burch v. Louisiana, 441 U.S. 130 (1979), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that invalidated a Louisiana statute allowing a conviction upon a nonunanimous verdict from a jury of six for a petty offense. The statute allowed for conviction if only five jurors agreed, and this was held to be a violation of the Sixth Amendment.

Background

Burch was found guilty of showing obscene films by a nonunanimous six-member jury in the state of Louisiana. The court imposed a suspended prison sentence of two consecutive seven- month terms and fined him $1,000.

Question Before the Court

Does a conviction by a nonunanimous six-member jury in a state criminal trial for a nonpetty offense violate Burch's Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury as applied to the states through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Decision of the Court

Justice Rehnquist cited Ballew v. Georgia, noting that only two other states in the country allowed for a non-unanimous decision from a non-six person jury in a non-petty offense. This "near uniform judgment of the Nation" gave the Court a "useful guide" in determining constitutionally allowable in jury practices.

References

  1. ^ Burch v. Louisiana, 441 U.S. 130 (1979). Public domain This article incorporates public domain material from this U.S government document.
  2. Varat, J. D.; et al. (2009). Constitutional Law Cases and Materials (Concise Thirteenth ed.). New York: Foundation Press. p. 356. ISBN 9781599414515.
  3. Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978).

External links

United States Sixth Amendment case law
Speedy Trial Clause
Public Trial Clause
Impartial Jury Clause
Availability
Impartiality
Facts found
Size and unanimity
Vicinage Clause
Impeachment of verdicts
Information Clause
Confrontation Clause
Out-of-court statements
Face-to-face confrontation
Restrictions on cross-examination
Compulsory Process Clause
Assistance of Counsel Clause
Choice
Appointment
Conflict-free
Ineffective assistance
Uncounseled statements
Pro se representation


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: