Misplaced Pages

Edgerton Bible Case

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
1890 Wisconsin Supreme Court case about religious instruction in public schools

State ex rel. Weiss v. District Board
Seal of the Wisconsin Supreme Court
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
Full case name State ex rel. Weiss et al. v. District Board of School District No. Eight
DecidedMarch 18, 1890
Citation76 Wis. 177
Case history
Appealed fromWisconsin Circuit Court for the 12th Judicial Circuit
Court membership
Judges sitting
Case opinions
Readings from the Bible in public schools constitute sectarian instruction, in violation of Art. X, Sec. 3, and Art. I, Sec. 18, of the Constitution of Wisconsin
Decision byLyon
ConcurrenceCassoday, Orton

State ex rel. Weiss v. District Board, 76 Wis. 177 (1890), popularly known as the Edgerton Bible case, was an important court case involving religious instruction in public schools of the U.S. state of Wisconsin. The case was unanimously decided in favor of the appellants, and declared that the use of the King James Bible in Edgerton public schools was unconstitutional sectarian education.

Background

In the early days of Edgerton, Wisconsin, it was common practice for public school teachers to read aloud to their students from the King James Bible. In 1886, Roman Catholic parents protested about that to the school board, citing their belief that the Douay version of the Bible was the only correct translation for their children.

After failing to convince the school board to end the practice, the parents—Frederick Weiss, W. H. Morrissey, Thomas Mooney, James McBride, J. C. Burns, and John Corbett—took their case to court. In November 1888, the circuit court judge, John R. Bennett, decided that the readings were not sectarian because both translations were of the same work. The parents then appealed the decision to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

In State ex rel Weiss v. District Board 76 Wis. 177 (1890), 3, otherwise known as the Edgerton Bible Case, the judges overruled the circuit court's decision by concluding that it illegally united the functions of church and state.

In 1963, the United States Supreme Court banned government-sponsored compulsory prayer from public schools (see Abington School District v. Schempp), and Justice William Brennan Jr. cited the Edgerton Bible case in his decision.

References

  1. ^ "Edgerton Bible Case". Wisconsin Historical Society. August 3, 2012. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  2. "State ex rel. Weiss and others vs. District Board, etc. 76 Wis. 177 (1890)" (PDF). Wisconsin Court System. 2011. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  3. Shiell, Tim. "The Edgerton Bible Case". Archived from the original on September 27, 2007.

Further reading

External links

United States First Amendment case law
Establishment Clause
Public displays
and ceremonies
Statutory religious
exemptions
Public funding
Religion in
public schools
Private religious speech
Internal church affairs
Taxpayer standing
Blue laws
Other
Free Exercise Clause
Exclusion of religion
from public benefits
Ministerial exception
Statutory religious exemptions
RFRA
RLUIPA
Freedom of speech (portal)
Unprotected
speech
Incitement
and sedition
Defamation and
false speech
Fighting words and
the heckler's veto
True threats
Obscenity
Speech integral
to criminal conduct
Strict scrutiny
Overbreadth
Vagueness
Symbolic speech
versus conduct
Content-based
restrictions
Content-neutral
restrictions
In the
public forum
Designated
public forum
Nonpublic
forum
Compelled speech
Compelled subsidy
of others' speech
Compelled representation
Government grants
and subsidies
Government
as speaker
Loyalty oaths
School speech
Public employees
Hatch Act and
similar laws
Licensing and
restriction of speech
Commercial speech
Campaign finance
and political speech
Anonymous speech
State action
Official retaliation
Boycotts
Prisons
Freedom of the press
Prior restraints
and censorship
Privacy
Taxation and
privileges
Defamation
Broadcast media
Copyrighted materials
Freedom of assembly
Incorporation
Protection from prosecution
and state restrictions
Freedom of association
Organizations
Future Conduct
Solicitation
Membership restriction
Primaries and elections
Freedom to petition
Categories: