Revision as of 21:09, 5 April 2007 editRgfolsom (talk | contribs)929 edits clean up history, link to Munehisa Homma← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:51, 8 December 2024 edit undo104.152.83.178 (talk) →Empirical evidence: deleted nit-picking "who?" tag, when sources are clearly cited | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Security analysis methodology}} | |||
{{Financial markets}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2021}} | |||
'''Technical analysis''' is the study of past financial market data, primarily through the use of ], to forecast price trends and make investment decisions.<ref name=Murphy>John J. Murphy, ''Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets'' (New York Institute of Finance, 1999), pages 1-5, 24-31.</ref> In its purest form, technical analysis is concerned ''only'' with the actual price behavior of the instrument, based on the theory that all other factors affecting valuation are reflected in the price before an investor can become aware of them through other channels. | |||
{{Financial markets}} | |||
In finance, '''technical analysis''' is an ] methodology for analysing and forecasting the direction of ] through the study of past market data, primarily price and volume.<ref name="Kirkpatrick_3">{{harvp|Kirkpatrick|Dahlquist|2006|p=3}}</ref> As a type of ], it stands in contradiction to much of ]. The efficacy of technical analysis is disputed by the ], which states that stock market prices are essentially unpredictable,<ref>{{cite book|title=The Evolution of Technical Analysis: Financial Prediction from Babylonian Tablets to Bloomberg Terminals|year=2010|publisher=]|isbn=978-1576603499|page=150|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HMR_YTo3l2AC|author=Andrew W. Lo|author2=Jasmina Hasanhodzic |access-date=8 August 2011}}</ref> and research on whether technical analysis offers any benefit has produced mixed results.<ref name=SurveysReview/><ref name="Osler">Osler, Karen (July 2000). "Support for Resistance: Technical Analysis and Intraday Exchange Rates," FRBNY Economic Policy Review ().</ref><ref name=Foundations /> It is distinguished from ], which considers a company's financial statements, health, and the overall state of the market and economy. | |||
==History== | |||
The principles of technical analysis are derived from hundreds of years of ] data.<ref>Joseph de la Vega, Confusión de Confusiones, 1688</ref> Some aspects of technical analysis began to appear in Amsterdam-based merchant ]'s accounts of the Dutch financial markets in the 17th century. In Asia, technical analysis is said to be a method developed by ] during the early 18th century which evolved into the use of ], and is today a technical analysis charting tool.<ref>{{cite book | first = Steve | last = Nison | title = Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques | year = 1991 | pages = 15–18 | publisher = New York Institute of Finance | isbn = 978-0-13-931650-0}}</ref><ref>Nison, Steve (1994). Beyond Candlesticks: New Japanese Charting Techniques Revealed, John Wiley and Sons, p. 14. {{ISBN|0-471-00720-X}}</ref> | |||
Journalist ] (1851-1902) compiled and closely analyzed American stock market data, and published some of his conclusions in editorials for ]. He believed patterns and ]s could possibly be found in this data, a concept later known as "]". However, Dow himself never advocated using his ideas as a stock trading strategy. | |||
In the 1920s and 1930s, Richard W. Schabacker published several books which continued the work of ] and ] in their books ''Stock Market Theory and Practice'' and ''Technical Market Analysis''. In 1948, Robert D. Edwards and John Magee published ''Technical Analysis of Stock Trends'' which is widely considered to be one of the seminal works of the discipline. It is exclusively concerned with trend analysis and chart patterns and remains in use to the present. Early technical analysis was almost exclusively the analysis of charts because the processing power of computers was not available for the modern degree of statistical analysis. Charles Dow reportedly originated a form of ] analysis. With the emergence of behavioral finance as a separate discipline in economics, Paul V. Azzopardi combined technical analysis with behavioral finance and coined the term "Behavioral Technical Analysis".<ref>Paul V. Azzopardi, "Behavioral Technical Analysis", ibid</ref> | |||
Other pioneers of analysis techniques include ], ], and ] who developed their respective techniques in the early 20th century.{{cn|date=September 2023}} | |||
==General description== | ==General description== | ||
Fundamental analysts examine earnings, dividends, assets, quality, ratios, new products, research and the like. Technicians employ many methods, tools and techniques as well, one of which is the use of charts. Using charts, technical analysts seek to identify price patterns and ]s in financial markets and attempt to exploit those patterns.<ref name=Murphy>Murphy, John J. ''Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets''. New York Institute of Finance, 1999, pp. 1–5, 24–31. {{ISBN|0-7352-0066-1}}</ref> | |||
Technical analysts identify non-random price patterns and trends in financial markets, and attempt to exploit those patterns.<ref name= Murphy/> While these analysts use various methods and tools, the study of charts of past price action is primary. Technical analysts especially search for archetypal patterns, such as the well-known reversal pattern, and also study the graphs of such indicators as ], ], and the ]. Many technical analysts also follow indicators of investor psychology (]). | |||
Technicians using charts search for archetypal price chart patterns, such as the well-known ]<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://primepair.com/trading-education/forex-analysis/technical-analysis#Head_and_Shoulders |title=PrimePair.com Head and Shoulders Pattern |access-date=6 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150106114558/http://primepair.com/trading-education/forex-analysis/technical-analysis#Head_and_Shoulders |archive-date=6 January 2015 |url-status=dead }}</ref> or ] reversal patterns, study ]s, ]s and look for forms such as lines of support, resistance, channels and more obscure formations such as ], ], balance days and ] patterns.<ref>{{harvp|Elder|1993|loc=Part III: Classical Chart Analysis}}</ref> | |||
Technical analysts do not claim that all price movements are predictable. Rather, the goal is to forecast movements in price and magnitude such that large gains from the correct predictions are enough to offset more numerous but smaller losses from incorrect predictions, leading to a positive return in the long run through proper ] control and ]. | |||
Technical analysts also widely use market indicators of many sorts, some of which are mathematical transformations of price, often including up and down volume, advance/decline data and other inputs. These indicators are used to help assess whether an asset is trending, and if it is, the probability of its direction and of continuation. Technicians also look for relationships between price/volume indices and market indicators. Examples include the ], ] and ]. Other avenues of study include correlations between changes in Options (]) and put/call ratios with price. Also important are sentiment indicators such as Put/Call ratios, bull/bear ratios, short interest, Implied ], etc. | |||
Technical analysis is frequently contrasted with '']'', the study of basic ] factors that some analysts say can influence the price moves in financial markets. Pure technical analysis holds that the effects of all such factors are already priced into the market before investors are aware of them, hence the study of price action alone. Some traders use one or the other style exclusively, while many others use both types of analysis together to make trading decisions. | |||
There are |
There are many techniques in technical analysis. Adherents of different techniques (for example: Candlestick analysis, the oldest form of technical analysis developed by a Japanese grain trader; ]; ]; and ]) may ignore the other approaches, yet many traders combine elements from more than one technique. Some technical analysts use subjective judgment to decide which pattern(s) a particular instrument reflects at a given time and what the interpretation of that pattern should be. Others employ a strictly mechanical or systematic approach to pattern identification and interpretation. | ||
===Comparison with fundamental analysis=== | |||
Some academic studies say technical analysis has little ], but other studies say it may produce excess returns. For example, measurable forms of technical analysis, such as non-linear prediction using ], have been shown to occasionally produce ] prediction results.<ref>Skabar, Cloete, </ref> As an example of the debate regarding the efficacy of technical analysis, ], a very well-known and successful fundamental analyst, once commented, "Charts are great for predicting the past." A ] working paper <ref>]. </ref> has shown that the statistical properties of intraday ] prices change near ] lines. | |||
Contrasting with technical analysis is '']'': the study of economic | |||
and other underlying factors that influence the way investors price financial markets. This may include regular corporate metrics like a company's recent ] figures, the estimated impact of recent staffing changes to the ], geopolitical considerations, and even scientific factors like the estimated future effects of ]. Pure forms of technical analysis can hold that prices already reflect all the underlying fundamental factors. Uncovering future trends is what technical indicators are designed to do, although neither technical nor fundamental indicators are perfect. Some traders use technical or fundamental analysis exclusively, while others use both types to make trading decisions.<ref>{{harvp|Elder|1993|loc=Part II: "Mass Psychology"; Chapter 17: "Managing versus Forecasting", pp. 65–68}}</ref><ref name="Wilmott">{{cite book|first1=Paul|last1=Wilmott|author1-link=Paul Wilmott|title=Paul Wilmott Introduces Quantitative Finance|publisher=Wiley|year=2007|isbn=978-0-470-31958-1|chapter = Appendix B, esp p. 628}}</ref> | |||
===Comparison with quantitative analysis === | |||
==History== | |||
The contrast against ] is less clear cut than the distinction with fundamental analysis. Some sources treat technical and quantitative analysis as more or less synonymous, while others draw a sharp distinction. For example, quantitative analysis expert ] suggests technical analysis is little more than 'charting' (making forecasts based on extrapolating graphical representations), and that technical analysis rarely has any predictive power.<ref name="Quants">{{cite web|url=http://seekingalpha.com/article/114523-beating-the-quants-at-their-own-game|title=Beating the Quants at Their Own Game|first=Dr. Hugh|last=Akston|date=13 January 2009}}</ref><ref name="Wilmott"/> | |||
The premises of technical analysis derived from the observation of ]s over hundreds of years. The oldest branch of technical analysis is the use of ] by ]ese traders as early as the ], and now one of the main charting techniques.<ref>{{cite book | first = Steve | last = Nison | title = Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques | year = 1991 | pages = 15 -18}}</ref> ], a successful rice trader in 18th century Japan, wrote the first book on technical analysis. He addressed the market's bullish and bearish cycles, and said that successful trading depends on understanding market psychology. | |||
==Principles== | |||
] inspired the use and development of modern technical analysis from the end of the ], a theory based on the collected writings of ] co-founder and editor ]. Modern technical analysis considers Dow Theory its cornerstone.<ref>{{cite web | last = Hill | first = Arthur | title = Dow Theory | url = http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/dowtheory1.html | accessdate = 2006-04-23}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
A core principle of technical analysis is that a market's price reflects all relevant information impacting that market. A technical analyst therefore looks at the history of a security or commodity's trading pattern rather than external drivers such as economic, fundamental and news events. It is believed that price action tends to repeat itself due to the collective, patterned behavior of investors. Hence technical analysis focuses on identifiable price trends and conditions.<ref>Elder (2008), Chapter 1 – section "Trend vs Counter-Trending Trading"</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://ownthedollar.com/2009/12/beware-stock-market-selffulfilling-prophecy/|title=Beware of the Stock Market as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy}}</ref> | |||
===Market action discounts everything=== | |||
Many more technical tools and theories have been developed and enhanced in recent decades, with an increasing emphasis on ]-assisted techniques. | |||
Based on the premise that all relevant information is already reflected by prices, technical analysts believe it is important to understand what investors think of that information, known and perceived. | |||
===Prices move in trends=== | |||
==Beliefs== | |||
{{See also|Market trend}} | |||
Technical analysis is not concerned with ''why'' a price is moving (e.g. poor earnings, difficult business environment, poor management, or other ]) but rather whether it is moving in a particular direction or in a particular ]. Technical analysts believe that profits can be made by "]." In other words if a particular stock price is ''steadily rising'' (trending upward) then a technical analyst will look for opportunities to buy this stock. | |||
Technical analysts believe that prices trend directionally, i.e., up, down, or sideways (flat) or some combination. The basic definition of a price trend was originally put forward by ].<ref name= Murphy/> | |||
An example of a security that had an apparent trend is AOL from November 2001 through August 2002. A technical analyst or trend follower recognizing this trend would look for opportunities to sell this security. AOL consistently moves downward in price. Each time the stock rose, sellers would enter the market and sell the stock; hence the "zig-zag" movement in the price. The series of "lower highs" and "lower lows" is a tell tale sign of a stock in a down trend.<ref name=Kahn>Kahn, Michael N. (2006). ''Technical Analysis Plain and Simple: Charting the Markets in Your Language'', Financial Times Press, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, p. 80. {{ISBN|0-13-134597-4}}.</ref> In other words, each time the stock moved lower, it fell below its previous relative low price. Each time the stock moved higher, it could not reach the level of its previous relative high price. | |||
Until the technical analyst is convinced this uptrend has reversed or ended, all else equal, he will continue to own this security. Additionally, technical analysts look for various price patterns to form on a price chart and will take positions in anticipation of the expected move following that pattern. The tools of technical analysis are believed to assist the technician in determining when trends have formed, ended, etc. and when particular patterns are unfolding. | |||
Note that the sequence of lower lows and lower highs did not begin until August. Then AOL makes a low price that does not pierce the relative low set earlier in the month. Later in the same month, the stock makes a relative high equal to the most recent relative high. In this a technician sees strong indications that the down trend is at least pausing and possibly ending, and would likely stop actively selling the stock at that point. | |||
For example, a popular technical analysis tool is a stock price's 200 day ]. This is usually defined as the average closing price of a stock over the past 200 trading days (though there are many variations on the moving average used in technical analysis). A stock that has been ''trending higher'' will have a history of an increasing daily stock price and an increasing 200 day moving average. Though the daily stock price fluctuates (up 50 cents on day 1, down 20 cents on day 2, up 10 cents on day 3, etc.), the 200 day moving average changes much more slowly and traces a smooth curve that follows the current price on a chart. | |||
===History tends to repeat itself=== | |||
When the 200 day moving average is ''violated by the daily stock price,'' a technical analyst uses this as strong evidence that a price trend has ended and that possibly a new one has begun to the opposite direction. Suppose IBM's 200 day moving average was 85 and the stock has been trending higher. If IBM closed at 84.50, then a technical analyst would consider selling his IBM holdings and perhaps selling short IBM because the perceived trend is ending. | |||
Technical analysts believe that investors collectively repeat the behavior of the investors who preceded them. To a technician, the emotions in the market may be irrational, but they exist. Because investor behavior repeats itself so often, technicians believe that recognizable (and predictable) price patterns will develop on a chart.<ref name= Murphy/> Recognition of these patterns can allow the technician to select trades that have a higher ] of success.<ref name=Baiynd2011>{{cite book |author=Baiynd, Anne-Marie |title=The Trading Book: A Complete Solution to Mastering Technical Systems and Trading Psychology |publisher=] |isbn=9780071766494 |pages=272 |year=2011 |url=http://www.mcgraw-hill.com.au/html/9780071766494.html |access-date=30 April 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120325050543/http://mcgraw-hill.com.au/html/9780071766494.html |archive-date=25 March 2012 |author-link=Anne-Marie Baiynd }}</ref> | |||
Technical analysis is not limited to charting, but it always considers price trends.<ref name="Kirkpatrick_3"/> For example, many technicians monitor surveys of investor sentiment. These surveys gauge the attitude of market participants, specifically whether they are ] or ]. Technicians use these surveys to help determine whether a trend will continue or if a reversal could develop; they are most likely to anticipate a change when the surveys report extreme investor sentiment.<ref>{{harvp|Kirkpatrick|Dahlquist|2006|p=87}}</ref> Surveys that show overwhelming bullishness, for example, are evidence that an uptrend may reverse; the premise being that if most investors are bullish they have already bought the market (anticipating higher prices). And because most investors ''are'' bullish and invested, one assumes that few buyers remain. This leaves more potential sellers than buyers, despite the bullish sentiment. This suggests that prices will trend down, and is an example of ].<ref>{{harvp|Kirkpatrick|Dahlquist|2006|p=86}}</ref> | |||
The above example illustrates a few important characteristics and potential shortfalls of technical analysis. Much of technical analysis is art and open to some varying interpretation. One technical analyst might believe that IBM would need to trade below its moving average for two consecutive days before declaring its trend over. Another might say one day is adequate. To a technician a close below the 200 day moving average is always important, but two technicans might disagree on the best way to act. Still, it is safe to assume that both technicians expect to sell IBM. | |||
==Industry== | |||
The obvious problem in this example is: what if in the near term IBM climbs back above its 200 day moving average after the technician sells his stock? If the technical analyst follows his own rules then he might be buying stock back at a higher price than he just sold plus commissions. This is a substantial component of some of the criticisms of technical analysis (see below). Technical analysis says "false signals" or "whipsaws" are an unavoidable part of using technical analysis. To a technical analyst, the costs of these whipsaws are far outweighed by catching a stock at the beginning of a new long term trend. Some research disputes this assertion however. | |||
The industry is globally represented by the International Federation of Technical Analysts (IFTA), which is a federation of regional and national organizations. In the United States, the industry is represented by both the CMT Association and the American Association of Professional Technical Analysts (AAPTA). The United States is also represented by the Technical Security Analysts Association of San Francisco (TSAASF). In the United Kingdom, the industry is represented by the Society of Technical Analysts (STA). The STA was a founding member of IFTA, has recently celebrated its 50th anniversary and certifies analysts with the Diploma in Technical Analysis. In Canada the industry is represented by the Canadian Society of Technical Analysts.<ref>''Technical Analysis: The Complete Resource for Financial Market Technicians'', p. 7</ref> In Australia, the industry is represented by the Australian Technical Analysts Association (ATAA),<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ataa.com.au|title=Home – Australian Technical Analysts Association}}</ref> (which is affiliated to IFTA) and the Australian Professional Technical Analysts (APTA) Inc.<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://www.apta.org.au | title=Home}}</ref> | |||
Professional technical analysis societies have worked on creating a body of knowledge that describes the field of Technical Analysis. A body of knowledge is central to the field as a way of defining how and why technical analysis may work. It can then be used by academia, as well as regulatory bodies, in developing proper research and standards for the field. The ] has published a body of knowledge, which is the structure for the Chartered Market Technician (CMT) exam.<ref>{{cite web |title=CMT Association Knowledge Base |url=https://cmtassociation.org/development/knowledge-base/ |access-date=16 August 2017 |archive-date=14 October 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171014220341/https://cmtassociation.org/development/knowledge-base/ |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=CMT Level I 2021: An Introduction to Technical Analysis|publisher=Wiley|isbn=978-1119768050|date=2021|url=|author=Wiley}}</ref> | |||
Technical analysis may be at odds with ]. Fundamental analysis maintains that markets may misprice a security and, through various methods of fundamental analysis, the "correct" price can be calculated. Profits can be made by trading the mispriced security and then waiting for the market to recognize its "mistake" and reprice the security. In contrast, a technical analyst is not interested in a security's "correct" price, only in price movement. | |||
===Software=== | |||
Two well known sayings among technical analysts are, "The trend is your friend," and "Forget the fundamentals and follow the money." An example of the different views of technical and fundamental analysis follows. Suppose a stock was trading at 124.25 pence, and that the consensus fundamental analysis view of the stock was that it was worth 120.00 pence. If the share price rose to 125.00 pence, then to 126.00 pence, and then to 127.00 pence, a technical analyst would likely be a buyer of this stock in order to profit from the perceived trend. In contrast, a fundamental analyst would possibly look to sell the stock as it is moving away from what the fundamental analyst believes is the "correct" price. | |||
Technical analysis software automates the charting, analysis and reporting functions that support technical analysts in their review and prediction of ]s (e.g. the ]).{{citation needed|date=August 2017}} | |||
In addition to installable desktop-based software packages in the traditional sense, the industry has seen an emergence of cloud-based applications and application programming interfaces (APIs) that deliver technical indicators (e.g., MACD, Bollinger Bands) via ] HTTP or intranet protocols. | |||
===Market action discounts everything=== | |||
The purpose of technical analysis is to interpret the signals generated from market price action. Technical analysts believe this method works because every possible bit of information will be reflected by means of market action. | |||
Modern technical analysis software is often available as a web or a smartphone application, without the need to download and install a software package. Some of them even offer an integrated programming language and automatic backtesting tools. | |||
Therefore it is redundant to explicitly do ], which may include a study of micro-factors like the instrument fundamentals and global-factors like ], ] issues. If that factor is going to affect the price of a ], the market will tell, vice versa. Only a study of the market is required.<ref name= Murphy/> | |||
==Systematic trading== | |||
===Prices move in trends=== | |||
{{main|Systematic trading}} | |||
{{See also|Trend (technical analysis)}} | |||
While it cannot be shown that prices must trend, technical analysis relies on empirical evidence to assert that prices do trend. To a technician, markets are trending up, trending down, or trending sideways (flat). This definition of a price trend is essentially the one put forward by Dow Theory.<ref name= Murphy/> | |||
===Neural networks=== | |||
A person who does not believe that prices move in trends will find little use for technical analysis. The assumption that prices must trend is probably the most important concept in technical analysis. | |||
Since the early 1990s when the first practically usable types emerged, ]s (ANNs) have rapidly grown in popularity. They are ] adaptive software systems that have been inspired by how biological neural networks work. They are used because they can learn to detect complex patterns in data. In mathematical terms, they are universal ],<ref>K. Funahashi, On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks, Neural Networks vol 2, 1989</ref><ref>K. Hornik, Multilayer feed-forward networks are universal approximators, Neural Networks, vol 2, 1989</ref> meaning that given the right data and configured correctly, they can capture and model any input-output relationships. This not only removes the need for human interpretation of charts or the series of rules for generating entry/exit signals, but also provides a bridge to fundamental analysis, as the variables used in fundamental analysis can be used as input. | |||
As ANNs are essentially non-linear statistical models, their accuracy and prediction capabilities can be both mathematically and empirically tested. In various studies, authors have claimed that neural networks used for generating trading signals given various technical and fundamental inputs have significantly outperformed buy-hold strategies as well as traditional linear technical analysis methods when combined with rule-based expert systems.<ref>R. Lawrence. </ref><ref>B.Egeli et al. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070620024840/http://www.hicbusiness.org/biz2003proceedings/Birgul%20Egeli.pdf |date=20 June 2007 }}</ref><ref>M. Zekić. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120424231150/http://oliver.efos.hr/nastavnici/mzekic/radovi/mzekic_varazdin98.pdf |date=24 April 2012 }}</ref> | |||
] | |||
While the advanced mathematical nature of such adaptive systems has kept neural networks for financial analysis mostly within academic research circles, in recent years more user friendly ] has made the technology more accessible to traders.{{Citation needed|date=November 2023}} | |||
An example of a security that is trending is AOL from November 2001 through August 2002. A technical analyst or trend follower recognizing this trend would look for opportunities to sell this security. AOL consistently moves downward in price. Each time the stock attempted to rise, sellers would enter the market and sell the stock; hence the "zig-zag" movement in the price. The series of "lower highs" and "lower lows" is a tell tale sign of a stock in a down trend. In other words, each time the stock edged lower, it went lower than its previous relative low price. Each time the stock moved higher, it could not reach the level of its previous relative high price. | |||
===Backtesting/Hindcasting=== | |||
Note that it is not until August that the sequence of lower lows and lower highs is broken. In August, the stock makes a low price that doesn't pierce the relative low set earlier in the month. Later in the same month, the stock makes a relative high equal to the most recent relative high. To a technical analyst, those are strong indications that the down trend is at least pausing and possibly ending. A technical analyst would likely stop actively selling the stock at this point. | |||
</ref>]] | |||
Systematic trading is most often employed after testing an investment strategy on historic data. This is known as ] (or ]). Backtesting is most often performed for technical indicators combined with volatility but can be applied to most investment strategies (e.g. fundamental analysis). While traditional backtesting was done by hand, this was usually only performed on human-selected stocks, and was thus prone to prior knowledge in stock selection. With the advent of computers, backtesting can be performed on entire exchanges over decades of historic data in very short amounts of time. | |||
The use of computers does have its drawbacks, being limited to algorithms that a computer can perform. Several trading strategies rely on human interpretation,<ref>{{harvp|Elder|1993|pp=54, 116–118}}</ref> and are unsuitable for computer processing.<ref>{{harvp|Elder|1993}}</ref> Only technical indicators which are entirely algorithmic can be programmed for computerized automated backtesting. | |||
===History tends to repeat itself=== | |||
Technical analysts believe that investors en masse repeat the behavior of the investors that preceded them. "Everyone wants in on the next Microsoft," "If this stock ever gets to $50 again, I will buy it," "This company's technology will revolutionize its industry, therefore this stock will skyrocket,"-- these are all examples of investors' attitudes repeating. To a technical analyst, the human characteristics of the market might be irrational, but they exist. Because investors' attitudes often repeat, investors' actions in the marketplace often repeat as well. I.e., patterns of price movement will develop on a chart that a technical analyst believes have predictive qualities.<ref name= Murphy/> | |||
==Combination with other market forecast methods== | |||
Technical analysis is not limited to charting. Technical analysis is always primarily concerned with price trends. Anything that can influence the price trend is of interest to a technical analyst. As an example, many technical analysts monitor surveys of investor enthusiasm. These surveys attempt to gauge the general attitude of the investment community to determine whether investors are ] or ]. Technical analysts use these surveys to help determine whether a trend will reverse or whether a new trend will develop. A technical analyst would be alerted that a trend might change when these surveys report extreme investor reactions. When surveys are overly bullish, for example, a technical analyst will look for evidence that an uptrend will reverse. The logic being that if most investors are bullish, then they would have already bought the market (anticipating that the market will move higher). But because most investors are bulllish and have invested, it is safe to assume that there are few buyers remaining in the market. With most investors ], there are more potential sellers in the market than buyers despite the fact that the overall attitude of investors is bullish. This implies that the market is set to trend down and is an example of a technical analysis concept called ] trading. | |||
] states that the principal sources of information available to technicians are price, volume and ].<ref name=Murphy/> Other data, such as indicators and ], are considered secondary. | |||
However, many technical analysts reach outside pure technical analysis, combining other market forecast methods with their technical work. One advocate for this approach is ], who coined the term ''rational analysis'' in the middle 1980s for the intersection of technical analysis and fundamental analysis.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/450723/the_capital_growth_letter.htm|title=The Capital Growth Letter – Research and Markets|first=Research and Markets|last=ltd}}</ref> Another such approach, fusion analysis, overlays fundamental analysis with technical, in an attempt to improve portfolio manager performance. | |||
Though former Federal Reserve Chairman ] has not described himself as a technical analyst, he has said that the history of investor behavior appears to repeat itself: | |||
<blockquote>"…there is one important caveat to the notion that we live in a new economy, and that is human psychology. The same enthusiasms and fears that gripped our forebears, are, in every way, visible in the generations now actively participating in the American economy. Human actions are always rooted in a forecast of the consequences of those actions... To be sure, the degree of risk aversion differs from person to person, but judging the way prices behave in today's markets compared with those of a century or more ago, one is hard pressed to find significant differences. The way we evaluate assets, and the way changes in those values affect our economy, do not appear to be coming out of a set of rules that is different from the one that governed the actions of our forebears…. As in the past, our advanced economy is primarily driven by how human psychology molds the value system that drives a competitive market economy. And that process is inextricably linked to human nature, which appears essentially immutable and, thus, anchors the future to the past." <ref>Alan Greenspan, , 4 September 1998.</ref></blockquote> | |||
Technical analysis is also often combined with ] and economics. For example, neural networks may be used to help identify intermarket relationships.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.iijournals.com/JOT/default.asp?Page=2&ISS=22278&SID=644085 |title=Archived copy |access-date=31 August 2007 |archive-date=12 January 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090112164116/http://www.iijournals.com/JOT/default.asp?Page=2&ISS=22278&SID=644085 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
Also, the Boston branch of the Federal Reserve for years has published its monthly "," which "incorporates technical and fundamental analysis commonly used by investment professionals to interpret the direction and valuation of equity markets." Each report begins with a discussion of "Technical Trends." It also includes the types of charts that technical analysts typically use, plus abundant notes and definitions regarding the technical indicators mentioned in each issue. | |||
Investor and newsletter polls, and magazine cover sentiment indicators, are also used by technical analysts.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sfomag.com/departmentprintdetail.asp?ID=1776333475|title=SFO|access-date=27 August 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071006150127/http://www.sfomag.com/departmentprintdetail.asp?ID=1776333475|archive-date=6 October 2007|url-status=usurped}}</ref> | |||
==Criticism== | |||
===Lack of evidence=== | |||
Although chartists assert that their techniques empirically provide excess returns over time, many ]s believe that technical analysis has no ]. ] in his book "]" (8th edition, 2003) and ] in "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," May 1970 summarize many early studies, conducted from the 1950s-70s, that show that after trading costs are considered, the returns generated by many technical strategies underperform a simple ] strategy. | |||
==Empirical evidence== | |||
Cheol-Ho Park and Scott H. Irwin reviewed 93 modern studies on the profitability of technical analysis and considered 59 of them to indicate positive results, and 24 negative results. "Despite the positive evidence ... it appears that most empirical studies are subject to various problems in their testing procedures, e.g., data snooping, ex post selection of trading rules or search technologies, and difficulties in estimation of risk and transaction costs." | |||
Whether technical analysis actually works is a matter of controversy. Methods vary greatly, and different technical analysts can sometimes make contradictory predictions from the same data. Many investors claim that they experience positive returns, but academic appraisals often find that it has little ].<ref>{{cite news | last =Browning | first =E.S. | title =Reading market tea leaves | work =The Wall Street Journal Europe | pages =17–18 | publisher =Dow Jones | date =31 July 2007 }}</ref> Of 95 modern studies, 56 concluded that technical analysis had positive results, although ] and other problems make the analysis difficult.<ref name=SurveysReview>{{cite journal | last1 = Irwin | first1 = Scott H. | last2 = Park | first2 = Cheol-Ho | year = 2007 | title = What Do We Know About the Profitability of Technical Analysis? | journal = Journal of Economic Surveys | volume = 21 | issue = 4| pages = 786–826 | doi = 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00519.x | s2cid = 154488391 }}</ref> Nonlinear prediction using ] occasionally produces ] prediction results.<ref>Skabar, Cloete, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718234410/http://crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV4Skabar.pdf |date=18 July 2011 }}</ref> A ] working paper<ref name=Osler/> regarding ] levels in short-term foreign exchange rates "offers strong evidence that the levels help to predict intraday trend interruptions", although the "predictive power" of those levels was "found to vary across the exchange rates and firms examined". | |||
See also . | |||
Technical trading strategies were found to be effective in the Chinese marketplace by a 2007 study that states, "Finally, we find significant positive returns on buy trades generated by the contrarian version of the ] rule, the channel breakout rule, and the Bollinger band trading rule, after accounting for transaction costs of 0.50%."<ref>Nauzer J. Balsara, Gary Chen and Lin Zheng ''The Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, Spring 2007''</ref> | |||
Critics of technical analysis include well known fundamental analysts. ] has said, "I realized technical analysis didn't work when I turned the charts upside down and didn't get a different answer" and "If past history was all there was to the game, the richest people would be librarians." | |||
An influential 1992 study by Brock et al. appeared to find support for technical trading rules.<ref>Brock, William, et al. “Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns.” The Journal of Finance, vol. 47, no. 5, 1992, pp. 1731–64. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2328994. Accessed 8 Dec. 2024.</ref> Sullivan and Timmerman tested the 1992 study for data snooping and other problems in 1999;<ref name=Sullivan1999>{{cite journal | author = Sullivan, R. |author2=Timmermann, A. |author3=White, H. | year = 1999 | title = Data-Snooping, Technical Trading Rule Performance, and the Bootstrap | journal = The Journal of Finance | volume = 54 | issue = 5 | pages = 1647–1691 | doi = 10.1111/0022-1082.00163 | |||
===Inconsistencies with other market hypotheses=== | |||
|citeseerx=10.1.1.50.7908 }}</ref> they determined the sample covered by Brock et al. was robust to data snooping. | |||
====Efficient market hypothesis==== | |||
The ] (EMH) concludes that technical analysis cannot be effective. If all relevant information is reflected quickly in a security's price through the actions of traders who have that information, no method, including technical analysis, can "beat the market". News events and new fundamental developments which influence prices occur ]ly and are unknowable in advance. EMH advocates have produced many studies that reject the efficacy of technical analysis. | |||
Subsequently, a comprehensive study of the question by Amsterdam economist Gerwin Griffioen concludes that: "for the U.S., Japanese and most Western European stock market indices the recursive out-of-sample forecasting procedure does not show to be profitable, after implementing little transaction costs. Moreover, for sufficiently high transaction costs it is found, by estimating ]s, that technical trading shows no statistically significant risk-corrected out-of-sample forecasting power for almost all of the stock market indices."<ref name="autogenerated1">Griffioen, ''''</ref> Transaction costs are particularly applicable to "momentum strategies"; a comprehensive 1996 review of the data and studies concluded that even small transaction costs would lead to an inability to capture any excess from such strategies.<ref name=Chan1996>{{cite journal | author = Chan, L.K.C. |author2=Jegadeesh, N. |author3=Lakonishok, J. | year = 1996 | title = Momentum Strategies | journal = The Journal of Finance | | |||
Proponents of technical analysis counter that technical analysis does not completely contradict the ]. Technicians agree with EMH in that they believe that all available information is reflected within a security's price; that is why technicians say a study of the price movement is necessary. Technicians argue that EMH ignores the realities of the market place, namely that many investors base their future expectations on past earnings, track records, etc. Because future stock prices can be strongly influenced by investor expectations, technicians claim it only follows that past prices can influence future prices. | |||
volume = 51 | issue = 5 | pages = 1681–1713| doi = 10.2307/2329534 | jstor=2329534}}</ref> | |||
In a 2000 paper published in the '']'', professor ] of MIT, working with Harry Mamaysky and Jiang Wang found that: | |||
Technicians point to the new field of ]. Behavioral finance essentially says that people are not the rational participants EMH makes them out to be. Market participants can and do act irrationally. Technicians have long held that irrational human behavior influences stock prices and claim to have ways of predicting probable outcomes based on this behavior. | |||
{{blockquote|Technical analysis, also known as "charting", has been a part of financial practice for many decades, but this discipline has not received the same level of academic scrutiny and acceptance as more traditional approaches such as fundamental analysis. One of the main obstacles is the highly subjective nature of technical analysis{{spaced ndash}}the presence of geometric shapes in historical price charts is often in the eyes of the beholder. In this paper, we propose a systematic and automatic approach to technical pattern recognition using nonparametric ], and apply this method to a large number of U.S. stocks from 1962 to 1996 to evaluate the effectiveness of technical analysis. By comparing the unconditional empirical distribution of daily stock returns to the conditional distribution{{spaced ndash}}conditioned on specific technical indicators such as head-and-shoulders or double-bottoms{{spaced ndash}}we find that over the 31-year sample period, several technical indicators do provide incremental information and may have some practical value.<ref name=Foundations />}} | |||
EMH advocates reply that although individual market participants do not always act rationally (or have complete information), their aggregate decisions complement each other, resulting in a rational outcome, (i.e. irrational optimists, wishing to buy stock and bid the price higher, are counter-balanced by irrational pessimists trying to sell their stock, until the price reaches equilibrium). Likewise, complete information is reflected in the price because all market participants bring their own individual, but incomplete, knowledge together in the market. | |||
In that same paper Lo wrote that "several academic studies suggest that ... technical analysis may well be an effective means for extracting useful information from market prices."<ref name=Foundations>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1111/0022-1082.00265 | last1 = Lo | first1 = Andrew W. | last2 = Mamaysky | first2 = Harry | last3 = Wang | first3 = Jiang | year = 2000 | title = Foundations of Technical Analysis: Computational Algorithms, Statistical Inference, and Empirical Implementation | journal = Journal of Finance | volume = 55 | issue = 4| pages = 1705–1765 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.134.1546 }}</ref> Some techniques such as ] attempt to overcome the past data bias by projecting support and resistance levels from differing time frames into the near-term future and combining that with reversion to the mean techniques.<ref>David Keller, "Breakthroughs in Technical Analysis; New Thinking from the World's Top Minds," New York, Bloomberg Press, 2007, {{ISBN|978-1-57660-242-3}} pp.1–19</ref> | |||
===Efficient-market hypothesis=== | |||
The ] (EMH) contradicts the basic tenets of technical analysis by stating that past prices cannot be used to profitably predict future prices. Thus it holds that technical analysis cannot be effective. Economist ] published the seminal paper on the EMH in the ''Journal of Finance'' in 1970, and said "In short, the evidence in support of the efficient markets model is extensive, and (somewhat uniquely in economics) contradictory evidence is sparse."<ref>Eugene Fama, ''The Journal of Finance'', volume 25, issue 2 (May 1970), pp. 383–417.</ref> | |||
However, because future stock prices can be strongly influenced by investor expectations, technicians claim it only follows that past prices influence future prices.<ref name=Aronson>Aronson, David R. (2006). , Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, pages 357, 355–356, 342. {{ISBN|978-0-470-00874-4}}.</ref> They also point to research in the field of ], specifically that people are not the rational participants EMH makes them out to be. Technicians have long said that irrational human behavior influences stock prices, and that this behavior leads to predictable outcomes.<ref name=Dichotomy>{{cite journal |author=]; Parker, Wayne D |year=2007 |title=The Financial/Economic Dichotomy in Social Behavioral Dynamics: The Socionomic Perspective |journal=Journal of Behavioral Finance |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=84–108 |doi=10.1080/15427560701381028|citeseerx=10.1.1.615.763 |s2cid=55114691 }}</ref> Author David Aronson says that the theory of behavioral finance blends with the practice of technical analysis: | |||
<blockquote>By considering the impact of emotions, cognitive errors, irrational preferences, and the dynamics of group behavior, behavioral finance offers succinct explanations of excess market volatility as well as the excess returns earned by stale information strategies.... cognitive errors may also explain the existence of market inefficiencies that spawn the systematic price movements that allow objective TA methods to work.<ref name=Aronson/></blockquote> | |||
EMH advocates reply that while individual market participants do not always act rationally (or have complete information), their aggregate decisions balance each other, resulting in a rational outcome (optimists who buy stock and bid the price higher are countered by pessimists who sell their stock, which keeps the price in equilibrium).<ref name=Clark>Clarke, J., T. Jandik, and Gershon Mandelker (2001). "The efficient markets hypothesis," ''Expert Financial Planning: Advice from Industry Leaders'', ed. R. Arffa, 126–141. New York: Wiley & Sons.</ref> Likewise, complete information is reflected in the price because all market participants bring their own individual, but incomplete, knowledge together in the market.<ref name=Clark/> | |||
====Random walk hypothesis==== | ====Random walk hypothesis==== | ||
The ] may be derived from the weak-form efficient markets hypothesis, which is based on the assumption that market participants take full account of any information contained in past price movements (but not necessarily other public information). In his book ''A Random Walk Down Wall Street'', Princeton economist ] said that technical forecasting tools such as pattern analysis must ultimately be self-defeating: "The problem is that once such a regularity is known to market participants, people will act in such a way that prevents it from happening in the future."<ref>Burton Malkiel, A Random Walk Down Wall Street, W. W. Norton & Company (April 2003) p. 168.</ref> Malkiel has stated that while momentum may explain some stock price movements, there is not enough momentum to make excess profits. Malkiel has compared technical analysis to "]".<ref name=huebscher>Robert Huebscher. . 7 July 2009.</ref> | |||
The ] is also at odds with technical analysis and charting. Essentially, the hypothesis claims that stock price movements are a ] with either independent or uncorrelated increments. In this model, movements in stock prices are not dependent on past stock prices, so trends cannot exist and technical analysis has no basis. Again, proponents of this theory have generated substantial research in support of the hypothesis. Random Walk advocates such as Burton Malkiel and John Allen Paulos believe that technical analysis and fundamental analysis are ]s. | |||
In the late 1980s, professors Andrew Lo and Craig McKinlay published a paper which cast doubt on the random walk hypothesis. In a 1999 response to Malkiel, Lo and McKinlay collected empirical papers that questioned the hypothesis' applicability<ref>Lo, Andrew; MacKinlay, Craig. ''A Non-Random Walk Down Wall Street'', Princeton University Press, 1999. {{ISBN|978-0-691-05774-3}}</ref> that suggested a non-random and possibly predictive component to stock price movement, though they were careful to point out that rejecting random walk does not necessarily invalidate EMH, which is an entirely separate concept from RWH. In a 2000 paper, ] back-analyzed data from the U.S. from 1962 to 1996 and found that "several technical indicators do provide incremental information and may have some practical value".<ref name=Foundations/> Burton Malkiel dismissed the irregularities mentioned by Lo and McKinlay as being too small to profit from.<ref name=huebscher/> | |||
The ] may be derived from the weak-form efficient markets hypothesis, which is based on the assumption that market participants take full account of any information contained in past price movements (but not necessarily other public information). | |||
Technicians argue that the EMH and random walk theories both ignore the realities of markets, in that participants are not completely rational and that current price moves are not independent of previous moves.<ref name=Kahn/><ref>Poser, Steven W. (2003). ''Applying Elliott Wave Theory Profitably'', John Wiley and Sons, p. 71. {{ISBN|0-471-42007-7}}.</ref> Some signal processing researchers negate the random walk hypothesis that stock market prices resemble ]es, because the statistical moments of such processes and real stock data vary significantly with respect to window size and ].<ref>Eidenberger, Horst (2011). "Fundamental Media Understanding" Atpress. {{ISBN|978-3-8423-7917-6}}.</ref> They argue that feature transformations used for the description of audio and ]s can also be used to predict stock market prices successfully which would contradict the random walk hypothesis. | |||
Technical analysts maintain that trends are identifiable in the market and that it can be impractical to believe that market prices move in a random fashion. To a technician, over time prices will trend in a direction until supply equals demand. Therefore, there cannot be any pure random price movement. As stated earlier, one of the cornerstones of technical analysis is that prices trend. If one does not believe this concept, one will not agree with technical analysis. | |||
The random walk index (RWI) is a technical indicator that attempts to determine if a stock's price movement is random in nature or a result of a statistically significant trend. The random walk index attempts to determine when the market is in a strong uptrend or downtrend by measuring price ranges over N and how it differs from what would be expected by a random walk (randomly going up or down). The greater the range suggests a stronger trend.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asiapacfinance.com/trading-strategies/technicalindicators/RandomWalkIndex|title=AsiaPacFinance.com Trading Indicator Glossary|access-date=1 August 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110901022339/http://www.asiapacfinance.com/trading-strategies/technicalindicators/RandomWalkIndex|archive-date=1 September 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
Also, with regards to EMH and Random Walk Theory, technicians claim that both theories ignore the realities of the marketplace. To a technician, the market is neither composed of completely rational participants as EMH assumes (participants can be greedy, overly risky, etc. at any given time) nor is its stock price movement completely independent of its prior movement (technicians will point at charts like AOL above). Critics respond that one can find virtually any chart pattern after the fact, but that this does not mean the pattern has any predictive power. Technicians maintain that both theories would also invalidate numerous other trading strategies such as ], ] and many other trading systems. | |||
Applying Kahneman and Tversky's ] to price movements, Paul V. Azzopardi provided a possible explanation why fear makes prices fall sharply while greed pushes up prices gradually.<ref>Azzopardi, Paul V. (2012), "Why Financial Markets Rise Slowly but Fall Sharply: Analysing market behaviour with behavioural finance", Harriman House, ASIN: B00B0Y6JIC</ref> This commonly observed behaviour of securities prices is sharply at odds with random walk. By gauging greed and fear in the market,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://money.cnn.com/data/fear-and-greed/|title=Fear & Greed Index - Investor Sentiment}}</ref> investors can better formulate long and short portfolio stances. | |||
==Industry== | |||
Globally, the industry is represented by . IFTA offers certification to professional technical analysts and researchers around the world as part of their ''Certified Financial Technician'' designation. In the United States, the industry is represented by two national level organizations: the and the ] (MTA). The MTA awards the ] certification to candidates who have passed a series of standardized exams. Numerous regional and local societies also exist in the U.S., such as the ]. In Canada the industry is represented by the . | |||
== |
==Scientific technical analysis== | ||
To many traders, trading in the direction of the trend is the most effective means to be profitable in ] or ] markets. ], ], ], ], ], ], and ] (some of the so-called ] in the popular book of the same name by ]) have each amassed massive fortunes through the use of technical analysis and its concepts over the course of decades. ], a technical analyst, coined one of the most popular phrases on Wall Street, "The trend is your friend!" | |||
Caginalp and Balenovich in 1994<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Gunduz Caginalp |author2=Donald Balenovich |year=2003 |title=A theoretical foundation for technical analysis |journal=Journal of Technical Analysis |volume=59 |pages=5–22 |url=http://www.pitt.edu/~caginalp/TechAn90.pdf |access-date=11 May 2015 |archive-date=24 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924074513/http://www.pitt.edu/~caginalp/TechAn90.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> used their asset-flow differential equations model to show that the major patterns of technical analysis could be generated with some basic assumptions. Some of the patterns such as a triangle continuation or reversal pattern can be generated with the assumption of two distinct groups of investors with different assessments of valuation. The major assumptions of the models are the finiteness of assets and the use of trend as well as valuation in decision making. Many of the patterns follow as mathematically logical consequences of these assumptions. | |||
Many non-arbitrage ] systems rely on the idea of trend-following, as do many ]. A relatively recent trend, both in research and industrial practice, has been the development of increasingly sophisticated automated trading strategies. These often rely on underlying technical analysis principles (see ] article for an overview). | |||
One of the problems with conventional technical analysis has been the difficulty of specifying the patterns in a manner that permits objective testing. | |||
==Systematic trading and technical analysis== | |||
===Neural networks=== | |||
Since the early 90's when the first practically usable types emerged, ]s (ANNs) have rapidly grown in popularity. They are ] adaptive software systems that have been inspired by how biological neural networks work. Their use comes in because they can learn to detect complex patterns in data. In mathematical terms, they are universal ] ] meaning that given the right data and configured correctly, they can capture and model any input-output relationships. This not only removes the need for human interpretation of charts or the series of rules for generating entry/exit signals but also provides a bridge to ] as that type of data can be used as input. | |||
Japanese candlestick patterns involve patterns of a few days that are within an uptrend or downtrend. Caginalp and Laurent<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Caginalp | first1 = G. | last2 = Laurent | first2 = H. | year = 1998 | title = The Predictive Power of Price Patterns | journal = Applied Mathematical Finance | volume = 5 | issue = 3–4 | pages = 181–206 | doi = 10.1080/135048698334637 | s2cid = 44237914 }}</ref> were the first to perform a successful large scale test of patterns. A mathematically precise set of criteria were tested by first using a definition of a short-term trend by smoothing the data and allowing for one deviation in the smoothed trend. They then considered eight major three-day candlestick reversal patterns in a non-parametric manner and defined the patterns as a set of inequalities. The results were positive with an overwhelming statistical confidence for each of the patterns using the data set of all S&P 500 stocks daily for the five-year period 1992–1996. | |||
In addition, as ANNs are essentially non-linear statistical models, their accuracy and prediction capabilities can be both mathematically and empirically tested. In various studies neural networks used for generating trading signals have significantly outperformed buy-hold strategies as well as traditional linear technical analysis methods.<ref>R. Lawrence. </ref> | |||
<ref>B.Egeli et al. </ref> | |||
<ref>M. Zekić. </ref> | |||
Among the most basic ideas of conventional technical analysis is that a trend, once established, tends to continue. However, testing for this trend has often led researchers to conclude that stocks are a random walk. One study, performed by Poterba and Summers,<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Poterba | first1 = J.M. | last2 = Summers | first2 = L.H. | year = 1988 | title = Mean reversion in stock prices: Evidence and Implications | journal = Journal of Financial Economics | volume = 22 | pages = 27–59 | doi = 10.1016/0304-405x(88)90021-9 | s2cid = 18901605 }}</ref> found a small trend effect that was too small to be of trading value. As Fisher Black | |||
While the advanced mathematical nature of such adaptive systems have kept neural networks for financial analysis mostly within academic research circles, in recent years more user friendly ] has made the technology more accessible to traders. | |||
noted,<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Black | first1 = F | year = 1986 | title = Noise | journal = Journal of Finance | volume = 41 | issue = 3 | pages = 529–43 | doi = 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04513.x | doi-access = free }}</ref> "noise" in trading price data makes it difficult to test hypotheses. | |||
One method for avoiding this noise was discovered in 1995 by Caginalp and Constantine<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Caginalp | first1 = G. | last2 = Constantine | first2 = G. | year = 1995 | title = Statistical inference and modeling of momentum in stock prices | journal = Applied Mathematical Finance | volume = 2 | issue = 4 | pages = 225–242 | doi = 10.1080/13504869500000012 | s2cid = 154176805 }}</ref> who used a ratio of two essentially identical closed-end funds to eliminate any changes in valuation. A closed-end fund (unlike an open-end fund) trades independently of its net asset value and its shares cannot be redeemed, but only traded among investors as any other stock on the exchanges. In this study, the authors found that the best estimate of tomorrow's price is not yesterday's price (as the efficient-market hypothesis would indicate), nor is it the pure momentum price (namely, the same relative price change from yesterday to today continues from today to tomorrow). But rather it is almost exactly halfway between the two. | |||
===Rule-based trading=== | |||
Rule-based trading is an approach to make one's trading plans by strict and clear-cut rules. Unlike some other technical methods or most fundamental analysis, it defines a set of rules that determines all trades, leaving minimal discretion. | |||
Starting from the characterization of the past time evolution of market prices in terms of price velocity and price acceleration, an attempt towards a general framework for technical analysis has been developed, with the goal of establishing a principled classification of the possible patterns characterizing the deviation or defects from the random walk market state and its time translational invariant properties.<ref>J. V. Andersen, S. Gluzman and D. Sornette, Fundamental Framework for Technical Analysis, European Physical Journal B 14, 579–601 (2000)</ref> The classification relies on two dimensionless parameters, the ] characterizing the relative strength of the acceleration with respect to the velocity and the time horizon forecast dimensionalized to the training period. Trend-following and contrarian patterns are found to coexist and depend on the dimensionless time horizon. Using a ] approach, the probabilistic based scenario approach exhibits statistically significant predictive power in essentially all tested market phases. | |||
For instance, a ] might make a set of rules stating that he will take a long position whenever the price of a particular instrument closes above its 50-day ], and shorting it whenever it drops below. | |||
A survey of modern studies by Park and Irwin<ref>C-H Park and S.H. Irwin, "The Profitability of Technical Analysis: A Review" AgMAS Project Research Report No. 2004-04</ref> showed that most found a positive result from technical analysis. | |||
== Charting terms and indicators == | |||
The five very common charting techniques used by everyday traders are: | |||
In 2011, Caginalp and DeSantis<ref>G. Caginalp and M. DeSantis, "Nonlinearity in the dynamics of financial markets," Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 12(2), 1140–1151, 2011.</ref> have used large data sets of closed-end funds, where comparison with valuation is possible, in order to determine quantitatively whether key aspects of technical analysis such as trend and resistance have scientific validity. Using data sets of over 100,000 points they demonstrate that trend has an effect that is at least half as important as valuation. The effects of volume and volatility, which are smaller, are also evident and statistically significant. An important aspect of their work involves the nonlinear effect of trend. Positive trends that occur within approximately 3.7 standard deviations have a positive effect. For stronger uptrends, there is a negative effect on returns, suggesting that profit taking occurs as the magnitude of the uptrend increases. For downtrends the situation is similar except that the "buying on dips" does not take place until the downtrend is a 4.6 standard deviation event. These methods can be used to examine investor behavior and compare the underlying strategies among different asset classes. | |||
* Balance days or "dojis" | |||
* Double tops | |||
* Channels | |||
* Lines of resistance | |||
* Pennants and/or flags | |||
In 2013, Kim Man Lui and T Chong pointed out that the past findings on technical analysis mostly reported the profitability of specific trading rules for a given set of historical data. These past studies had not taken the human trader into consideration as no real-world trader would mechanically adopt signals from any technical analysis method. Therefore, to unveil the truth of technical analysis, we should get back to understand the performance between experienced and novice traders. If the market really walks randomly, there will be no difference between these two kinds of traders. However, it is found by experiment that traders who are more knowledgeable on technical analysis significantly outperform those who are less knowledgeable.<ref>K.M. Lui and T.T.L Chong, "Do Technical Analysts Outperform Novice Traders: Experimental Evidence" Economics Bulletin. 33(4), 3080–3087, 2013.</ref> | |||
Other widely-known technical analysis concepts include: | |||
* ]—based on the close within the day's range | |||
==Ticker-tape reading== | |||
* ] - averaged daily trading range | |||
* ] - a range of price volatility | |||
{{Main|Ticker tape}} | |||
* ] - when a price passes through and stays above an area of ] or ] | |||
* ] - identifies cyclical trends | |||
Until the mid-1960s, '''tape reading''' was a popular form of technical analysis. It consisted of reading market information such as price, volume, order size, and so on from a paper strip which ran through a machine called a ]. Market data was sent to brokerage houses and to the homes and offices of the most active speculators. This system fell into disuse with the advent of electronic information panels in the late 60's, and later computers, which allow for the easy preparation of charts. | |||
], one of the most successful stock market operators of all time, was primarily concerned with ticker tape reading since a young age. He followed his own (mechanical) trading system (he called it the 'market key'), which did not need charts, but was relying solely on price data. He described his market key in detail in his 1940s book 'How to Trade in Stocks'.<ref>{{harvp|Livermore|1940}}</ref> Livermore's system was determining market phases (trend, correction etc.) via past price data. He also made use of volume data (which he estimated from how stocks behaved and via 'market testing', a process of testing market liquidity via sending in small market orders), as described in his 1940s book. | |||
== Quotation board == | |||
Another form of technical analysis used so far was via interpretation of ] contained in quotation boards, that in the times before ], were huge ] located in the stock exchanges, with data of the main financial assets listed on exchanges for analysis of their movements.<ref>{{harvp|Lefèvre|2000|pp=1, 18}}</ref> It was manually updated with chalk, with the updates regarding some of these data being transmitted to environments outside of exchanges (such as ], ], etc.) via the aforementioned tape, ], telephone and later ].<ref>{{harvp|Lefèvre|2000|p=17}}</ref> | |||
This analysis tool was used both, on the spot, mainly by market professionals, as well as by general public through the printed versions in newspapers showing the data of the negotiations of the previous day, for ] and ].<ref>{{harvp|Livermore|1940|pp=17–18}}</ref> | |||
==Charting terms and indicators== | |||
===Concepts=== | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}averaged daily trading range, adjusted for price gaps. | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}the concept whereby prices forcefully penetrate an area of prior ] or ], usually, but not always, accompanied by an increase in volume. | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}distinctive pattern created by the movement of security or commodity prices on a chart | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}time targets for potential change in price action (price only moves up, down, or sideways) | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}the phenomenon whereby a spectacular decline in the price of a stock is immediately followed by a moderate and temporary rise before resuming its downward movement | |||
* ] and the ] to calculate successive price movements and retracements | * ] and the ] to calculate successive price movements and retracements | ||
* ]s{{spaced ndash}}used as a guide to determine support and resistance and retracement percentages | |||
* ] - pattern for identifying reversals and continuations | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}the rate of price change | |||
* ] - ] convergence/divergence | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}A priced-based analytical approach employing numerical filters which may incorporate time references, though ignores time entirely in its construction | |||
* ] - the rate of price change | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}a price level that may prompt a net increase of selling activity | |||
* ] - the amount of stock traded on days the price went up | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}a price level that may prompt a net increase of buying activity | |||
* ] - lags behind the price action | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}the phenomenon by which price movement tends to persist in one direction for an extended period of time | |||
* ] - the momentum of buying and selling stocks | |||
* ] - two-dimensional method for charting volume by price level | |||
* ] - Wilder's ] based on ] tending to stay within a ] curve during a strong ] | |||
* ] - derived by calculating the numerical average of a particular currency's or stock's high, low and closing prices | |||
* ] - charts based on price without time | |||
* ] - oscillator showing price strength | |||
* ] - an area that brings on increased selling | |||
* ], close position within recent trading range | |||
* ] - an area that brings on increased buying | |||
* ] - a sloping line of support or resistance | |||
* ] - an oscillator showing the slope of a triple-smoothed exponential ], developed in the 1980s by Jack Hutson | |||
===Types of charts=== | |||
==Books== | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}Of Japanese origin and similar to OHLC, candlesticks widen and fill the interval between the open and close prices to emphasize the open/close relationship. In the West, often black or red candle bodies represent a close lower than the open, while white, green or blue candles represent a close higher than the open price. | |||
* <cite>Ichimoku Charts</cite>, ], Harriman House, 2007, ISBN 9781897597842 | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}Connects the closing price values with line segments. You can also choose to draw the line chart using open, high or low price. | |||
* <cite>Getting Started in Technical Analysis</cite>, ], Wiley, 1999, ISBN 0-471-29542-6 | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}OHLC charts, also known as bar charts, plot the span between the high and low prices of a trading period as a vertical line segment at the trading time, and the open and close prices with horizontal tick marks on the range line, usually a tick to the left for the open price and a tick to the right for the closing price. | |||
* <cite>New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems</cite>, J. Welles Wilder, Trend Research, 1978, ISBN 0-89459-027-8 | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}a chart type employing numerical filters with only passing references to time, and which ignores time entirely in its construction. | |||
* <cite>]</cite>, Edwin Lefèvre, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1994, ISBN 0-471-05970-6 | |||
* <cite>Street Smarts</cite>, Connors/Raschke, 1995, ISBN 0-9650461-0-9 | |||
* <cite>Technical Analysis of Futures Markets</cite>, John J. Murphy, New York Institute of Finance, 1986, ISBN 0-13-898008-X | |||
* <cite>Technical Analysis of Stock Trends, 8th Edition (Hardcover)</cite>, Robert D. Edwards, John Magee, W. H. C. Bassetti (Editor), American Management Association, 2001, ISBN 0-8144-0680-7 | |||
* <cite>Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets</cite>, John J. Murphy, New York Institute of Finance, 1999, ISBN 0-7352-0066-1 | |||
* <cite>The Profit Magic of Stock Transaction Timing</cite>, J.M. Hurst, Prentice-Hall, 1972, ISBN 0-13-726018-0 | |||
* <cite>The Free E-Book of Technical Analysis</cite>, Wallstreetcourier, www.wallstreetcourier.com/ebook/The_E-Book_of_Technical_Market_Indicators.pdf | |||
== |
===Overlays=== | ||
Overlays are generally superimposed over the main price chart. | |||
<references/> | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}a range of price volatility | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}a pair of parallel trend lines | |||
* ] kinko hyo{{spaced ndash}}a moving average-based system that factors in time and the average point between a candle's high and low | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}an average over a window of time before and after a given time point that is repeated at each time point in the given chart. A moving average can be thought of as a kind of dynamic trend-line. | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}Wilder's ] based on ] tending to stay within a ] curve during a strong trend | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}derived by calculating the numerical average of a particular currency's or stock's high, low and closing prices | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}a price level that may act as a ceiling above price | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}a price level that may act as a floor below price | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}a sloping line described by at least two peaks or two troughs | |||
* Zig Zag{{spaced ndash}}This chart overlay that shows filtered price movements that are greater than a given percentage. | |||
===Breadth indicators=== | |||
These indicators are based on statistics derived from the broad market. | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}a popular indicator of ]. | |||
* ] – a popular ] indicator of breadth. | |||
* ] – a popular ] indicator of breadth. | |||
===Price-based indicators=== | |||
These indicators are generally shown below or above the main price chart. | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}a widely used indicator of trend strength. | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}identifies cyclical trends. | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}] convergence/divergence. | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}the rate of price change. | |||
* ] (RSI){{spaced ndash}}oscillator showing price strength. | |||
* Relative Vigor Index (RVI){{spaced ndash}}oscillator measures the conviction of a recent price action and the likelihood that it will continue. | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}close position within recent trading range. | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}an oscillator showing the slope of a triple-smoothed exponential ]. | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}an indicator used to identify the existence, continuation, initiation or termination of trends. | |||
===Volume-based indicators=== | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}based on the close within the day's range. | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}the amount of stock traded on days the price went up. | |||
* ]{{spaced ndash}}the momentum of buying and selling stocks. | |||
===Trading with Mixing Indicators=== | |||
*] & ] | |||
*] & Super Trend | |||
*] & ] | |||
*MACD & RSI | |||
*MACD & Moving Averages | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{div col|colwidth=30em}} | |||
*] | |||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
* ] / ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
*] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
== References == | |||
{{Reflist|24em}} | |||
==Bibliography== | |||
{{Refbegin}} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Elder |first=Alexander |year=1993 |title=Trading for a Living; Psychology, Trading Tactics, Money Management |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-0-47159224-2 |url=https://archive.org/details/tradingforliving00elde_0 }} | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Kirkpatrick |first1=Charles D. |last2=Dahlquist |first2=Julie R. |year=2006 |title=Technical Analysis: The Complete Resource for Financial Market Technicians |publisher=Financial Times Press |isbn=978-0-13-153113-0 }} | |||
*{{cite book |last=Lefèvre |first=Edwin |author-link=Edwin Lefèvre |year=2000 |orig-year=1923 |title=Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: With new Commentary and Insights on the Life and Times of Jesse Livermore |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=9780470481592 |title-link=Reminiscences of a Stock Operator }} | |||
*{{cite book|last=Livermore|first=Jesse Lauriston|year=1940|title=How to Trade in Stocks|publisher=Duell, Sloan & Pearce NY }} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
==Further reading== | |||
* Azzopardi, Paul V. ''Behavioural Technical Analysis: An introduction to behavioural finance and its role in technical analysis''. Harriman House, 2010. {{ISBN|978-1905641413}} | |||
* Colby, Robert W. ''The Encyclopedia of Technical Market Indicators''. 2nd Edition. McGraw Hill, 2003. {{ISBN|0-07-012057-9}} | |||
* Covel, Michael. ''The Complete Turtle Trader''. ], 2007. {{ISBN|9780061241703}} | |||
* Douglas, Mark. ''The Disciplined Trader''. New York Institute of Finance, 1990. {{ISBN|0-13-215757-8}} | |||
* Edwards, Robert D.; Magee, John; Bassetti, W.H.C. ''Technical Analysis of Stock Trends'', 9th Edition (Hardcover). American Management Association, 2007. {{ISBN|0-8493-3772-0}} | |||
* ]. ''The Myth of the Rational Market''. HarperCollings, 2009. {{ISBN|9780060598990}} | |||
* Hurst, J. M. ''The Profit Magic of Stock Transaction Timing''. Prentice-Hall, 1972. {{ISBN|0-13-726018-0}} | |||
* Neill, Humphrey B. ''Tape Reading & Market Tactics''. First edition of 1931. Market Place 2007 reprint {{ISBN|1592802621}} | |||
* Neill, Humphrey B. ''The Art of Contrary Thinking''. Caxton Press 1954. | |||
* Pring, Martin J. ''Technical Analysis Explained: The Successful Investor's Guide to Spotting Investment Trends and Turning Points''. McGraw Hill, 2002. {{ISBN|0-07-138193-7}} | |||
* Raschke, Linda Bradford; Connors, Lawrence A. ''Street Smarts: High Probability Short-Term Trading Strategies''. M. Gordon Publishing Group, 1995. {{ISBN|0-9650461-0-9}} | |||
* Rollo Tape & Wyckoff, Richard D. ''Studies in Tape Reading'' The Ticker Publishing Co. NY 1910. | |||
* Tharp, Van K. ''Definitive Guide to Position Sizing'' International Institute of Trading Mastery, 2008. {{ISBN|0935219099}} | |||
* Wilder, J. Welles. ''New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems''. Trend Research, 1978. {{ISBN|0-89459-027-8}} | |||
* Ladis Konecny, ''Stocks and Exchange – the only Book you need'', 2013, {{ISBN|9783848220656}}, technical analysis = chapter 8. | |||
*Schabackers, Richard W. ''Stock Market Theory and Practice,'' 2011. {{ISBN|9781258159474}} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{ |
{{Sister project links|Technical analysis|n=no|q=no|s=no}} | ||
<!-- Misplaced Pages is NOT a link depository. Considering all the commercial links on this site before |
<!-- Misplaced Pages is NOT a link depository. Considering all the commercial links on this site before ,links added to this entry will be watched RATHER CLOSELY. --> | ||
<!--===========================({{NoMoreLinks}})===============================--> | <!--===========================({{NoMoreLinks}})===============================--> | ||
<!--| DO NOT ADD MORE LINKS TO THIS ARTICLE. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A COLLECTION OF |--> | <!--| DO NOT ADD MORE LINKS TO THIS ARTICLE. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A COLLECTION OF |--> | ||
Line 190: | Line 288: | ||
<!--| See ] and ] for details |--> | <!--| See ] and ] for details |--> | ||
<!--===========================({{NoMoreLinks}})===============================--> | <!--===========================({{NoMoreLinks}})===============================--> | ||
* | |||
<!--| Actioning "Links that have not been verified WILL BE DELETED. |--> | |||
;International and national organizations | |||
* | * | ||
* | * Singapore: | ||
* | * United States: | ||
* United Kingdom: | |||
* | |||
* | |||
{{Technical analysis}} | |||
{{Stock market}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
{{stock market}} |
Latest revision as of 14:51, 8 December 2024
Security analysis methodology
In finance, technical analysis is an analysis methodology for analysing and forecasting the direction of prices through the study of past market data, primarily price and volume. As a type of active management, it stands in contradiction to much of modern portfolio theory. The efficacy of technical analysis is disputed by the efficient-market hypothesis, which states that stock market prices are essentially unpredictable, and research on whether technical analysis offers any benefit has produced mixed results. It is distinguished from fundamental analysis, which considers a company's financial statements, health, and the overall state of the market and economy.
History
The principles of technical analysis are derived from hundreds of years of financial market data. Some aspects of technical analysis began to appear in Amsterdam-based merchant Joseph de la Vega's accounts of the Dutch financial markets in the 17th century. In Asia, technical analysis is said to be a method developed by Homma Munehisa during the early 18th century which evolved into the use of candlestick techniques, and is today a technical analysis charting tool.
Journalist Charles Dow (1851-1902) compiled and closely analyzed American stock market data, and published some of his conclusions in editorials for The Wall Street Journal. He believed patterns and business cycles could possibly be found in this data, a concept later known as "Dow theory". However, Dow himself never advocated using his ideas as a stock trading strategy.
In the 1920s and 1930s, Richard W. Schabacker published several books which continued the work of Charles Dow and William Peter Hamilton in their books Stock Market Theory and Practice and Technical Market Analysis. In 1948, Robert D. Edwards and John Magee published Technical Analysis of Stock Trends which is widely considered to be one of the seminal works of the discipline. It is exclusively concerned with trend analysis and chart patterns and remains in use to the present. Early technical analysis was almost exclusively the analysis of charts because the processing power of computers was not available for the modern degree of statistical analysis. Charles Dow reportedly originated a form of point and figure chart analysis. With the emergence of behavioral finance as a separate discipline in economics, Paul V. Azzopardi combined technical analysis with behavioral finance and coined the term "Behavioral Technical Analysis".
Other pioneers of analysis techniques include Ralph Nelson Elliott, William Delbert Gann, and Richard Wyckoff who developed their respective techniques in the early 20th century.
General description
Fundamental analysts examine earnings, dividends, assets, quality, ratios, new products, research and the like. Technicians employ many methods, tools and techniques as well, one of which is the use of charts. Using charts, technical analysts seek to identify price patterns and market trends in financial markets and attempt to exploit those patterns.
Technicians using charts search for archetypal price chart patterns, such as the well-known head and shoulders or double top/bottom reversal patterns, study technical indicators, moving averages and look for forms such as lines of support, resistance, channels and more obscure formations such as flags, pennants, balance days and cup and handle patterns.
Technical analysts also widely use market indicators of many sorts, some of which are mathematical transformations of price, often including up and down volume, advance/decline data and other inputs. These indicators are used to help assess whether an asset is trending, and if it is, the probability of its direction and of continuation. Technicians also look for relationships between price/volume indices and market indicators. Examples include the moving average, relative strength index and MACD. Other avenues of study include correlations between changes in Options (implied volatility) and put/call ratios with price. Also important are sentiment indicators such as Put/Call ratios, bull/bear ratios, short interest, Implied Volatility, etc.
There are many techniques in technical analysis. Adherents of different techniques (for example: Candlestick analysis, the oldest form of technical analysis developed by a Japanese grain trader; Harmonics; Dow theory; and Elliott wave theory) may ignore the other approaches, yet many traders combine elements from more than one technique. Some technical analysts use subjective judgment to decide which pattern(s) a particular instrument reflects at a given time and what the interpretation of that pattern should be. Others employ a strictly mechanical or systematic approach to pattern identification and interpretation.
Comparison with fundamental analysis
Contrasting with technical analysis is fundamental analysis: the study of economic and other underlying factors that influence the way investors price financial markets. This may include regular corporate metrics like a company's recent EBITDA figures, the estimated impact of recent staffing changes to the board of directors, geopolitical considerations, and even scientific factors like the estimated future effects of global warming. Pure forms of technical analysis can hold that prices already reflect all the underlying fundamental factors. Uncovering future trends is what technical indicators are designed to do, although neither technical nor fundamental indicators are perfect. Some traders use technical or fundamental analysis exclusively, while others use both types to make trading decisions.
Comparison with quantitative analysis
The contrast against quantitative analysis is less clear cut than the distinction with fundamental analysis. Some sources treat technical and quantitative analysis as more or less synonymous, while others draw a sharp distinction. For example, quantitative analysis expert Paul Wilmott suggests technical analysis is little more than 'charting' (making forecasts based on extrapolating graphical representations), and that technical analysis rarely has any predictive power.
Principles
A core principle of technical analysis is that a market's price reflects all relevant information impacting that market. A technical analyst therefore looks at the history of a security or commodity's trading pattern rather than external drivers such as economic, fundamental and news events. It is believed that price action tends to repeat itself due to the collective, patterned behavior of investors. Hence technical analysis focuses on identifiable price trends and conditions.
Market action discounts everything
Based on the premise that all relevant information is already reflected by prices, technical analysts believe it is important to understand what investors think of that information, known and perceived.
Prices move in trends
See also: Market trendTechnical analysts believe that prices trend directionally, i.e., up, down, or sideways (flat) or some combination. The basic definition of a price trend was originally put forward by Dow theory.
An example of a security that had an apparent trend is AOL from November 2001 through August 2002. A technical analyst or trend follower recognizing this trend would look for opportunities to sell this security. AOL consistently moves downward in price. Each time the stock rose, sellers would enter the market and sell the stock; hence the "zig-zag" movement in the price. The series of "lower highs" and "lower lows" is a tell tale sign of a stock in a down trend. In other words, each time the stock moved lower, it fell below its previous relative low price. Each time the stock moved higher, it could not reach the level of its previous relative high price.
Note that the sequence of lower lows and lower highs did not begin until August. Then AOL makes a low price that does not pierce the relative low set earlier in the month. Later in the same month, the stock makes a relative high equal to the most recent relative high. In this a technician sees strong indications that the down trend is at least pausing and possibly ending, and would likely stop actively selling the stock at that point.
History tends to repeat itself
Technical analysts believe that investors collectively repeat the behavior of the investors who preceded them. To a technician, the emotions in the market may be irrational, but they exist. Because investor behavior repeats itself so often, technicians believe that recognizable (and predictable) price patterns will develop on a chart. Recognition of these patterns can allow the technician to select trades that have a higher probability of success.
Technical analysis is not limited to charting, but it always considers price trends. For example, many technicians monitor surveys of investor sentiment. These surveys gauge the attitude of market participants, specifically whether they are bearish or bullish. Technicians use these surveys to help determine whether a trend will continue or if a reversal could develop; they are most likely to anticipate a change when the surveys report extreme investor sentiment. Surveys that show overwhelming bullishness, for example, are evidence that an uptrend may reverse; the premise being that if most investors are bullish they have already bought the market (anticipating higher prices). And because most investors are bullish and invested, one assumes that few buyers remain. This leaves more potential sellers than buyers, despite the bullish sentiment. This suggests that prices will trend down, and is an example of contrarian trading.
Industry
The industry is globally represented by the International Federation of Technical Analysts (IFTA), which is a federation of regional and national organizations. In the United States, the industry is represented by both the CMT Association and the American Association of Professional Technical Analysts (AAPTA). The United States is also represented by the Technical Security Analysts Association of San Francisco (TSAASF). In the United Kingdom, the industry is represented by the Society of Technical Analysts (STA). The STA was a founding member of IFTA, has recently celebrated its 50th anniversary and certifies analysts with the Diploma in Technical Analysis. In Canada the industry is represented by the Canadian Society of Technical Analysts. In Australia, the industry is represented by the Australian Technical Analysts Association (ATAA), (which is affiliated to IFTA) and the Australian Professional Technical Analysts (APTA) Inc.
Professional technical analysis societies have worked on creating a body of knowledge that describes the field of Technical Analysis. A body of knowledge is central to the field as a way of defining how and why technical analysis may work. It can then be used by academia, as well as regulatory bodies, in developing proper research and standards for the field. The CMT Association has published a body of knowledge, which is the structure for the Chartered Market Technician (CMT) exam.
Software
Technical analysis software automates the charting, analysis and reporting functions that support technical analysts in their review and prediction of financial markets (e.g. the stock market).
In addition to installable desktop-based software packages in the traditional sense, the industry has seen an emergence of cloud-based applications and application programming interfaces (APIs) that deliver technical indicators (e.g., MACD, Bollinger Bands) via RESTful HTTP or intranet protocols.
Modern technical analysis software is often available as a web or a smartphone application, without the need to download and install a software package. Some of them even offer an integrated programming language and automatic backtesting tools.
Systematic trading
Main article: Systematic tradingNeural networks
Since the early 1990s when the first practically usable types emerged, artificial neural networks (ANNs) have rapidly grown in popularity. They are artificial intelligence adaptive software systems that have been inspired by how biological neural networks work. They are used because they can learn to detect complex patterns in data. In mathematical terms, they are universal function approximators, meaning that given the right data and configured correctly, they can capture and model any input-output relationships. This not only removes the need for human interpretation of charts or the series of rules for generating entry/exit signals, but also provides a bridge to fundamental analysis, as the variables used in fundamental analysis can be used as input.
As ANNs are essentially non-linear statistical models, their accuracy and prediction capabilities can be both mathematically and empirically tested. In various studies, authors have claimed that neural networks used for generating trading signals given various technical and fundamental inputs have significantly outperformed buy-hold strategies as well as traditional linear technical analysis methods when combined with rule-based expert systems.
While the advanced mathematical nature of such adaptive systems has kept neural networks for financial analysis mostly within academic research circles, in recent years more user friendly neural network software has made the technology more accessible to traders.
Backtesting/Hindcasting
Systematic trading is most often employed after testing an investment strategy on historic data. This is known as backtesting (or hindcasting). Backtesting is most often performed for technical indicators combined with volatility but can be applied to most investment strategies (e.g. fundamental analysis). While traditional backtesting was done by hand, this was usually only performed on human-selected stocks, and was thus prone to prior knowledge in stock selection. With the advent of computers, backtesting can be performed on entire exchanges over decades of historic data in very short amounts of time.
The use of computers does have its drawbacks, being limited to algorithms that a computer can perform. Several trading strategies rely on human interpretation, and are unsuitable for computer processing. Only technical indicators which are entirely algorithmic can be programmed for computerized automated backtesting.
Combination with other market forecast methods
John Murphy states that the principal sources of information available to technicians are price, volume and open interest. Other data, such as indicators and sentiment analysis, are considered secondary.
However, many technical analysts reach outside pure technical analysis, combining other market forecast methods with their technical work. One advocate for this approach is John Bollinger, who coined the term rational analysis in the middle 1980s for the intersection of technical analysis and fundamental analysis. Another such approach, fusion analysis, overlays fundamental analysis with technical, in an attempt to improve portfolio manager performance.
Technical analysis is also often combined with quantitative analysis and economics. For example, neural networks may be used to help identify intermarket relationships.
Investor and newsletter polls, and magazine cover sentiment indicators, are also used by technical analysts.
Empirical evidence
Whether technical analysis actually works is a matter of controversy. Methods vary greatly, and different technical analysts can sometimes make contradictory predictions from the same data. Many investors claim that they experience positive returns, but academic appraisals often find that it has little predictive power. Of 95 modern studies, 56 concluded that technical analysis had positive results, although data-snooping bias and other problems make the analysis difficult. Nonlinear prediction using neural networks occasionally produces statistically significant prediction results. A Federal Reserve working paper regarding support and resistance levels in short-term foreign exchange rates "offers strong evidence that the levels help to predict intraday trend interruptions", although the "predictive power" of those levels was "found to vary across the exchange rates and firms examined".
Technical trading strategies were found to be effective in the Chinese marketplace by a 2007 study that states, "Finally, we find significant positive returns on buy trades generated by the contrarian version of the moving-average crossover rule, the channel breakout rule, and the Bollinger band trading rule, after accounting for transaction costs of 0.50%."
An influential 1992 study by Brock et al. appeared to find support for technical trading rules. Sullivan and Timmerman tested the 1992 study for data snooping and other problems in 1999; they determined the sample covered by Brock et al. was robust to data snooping.
Subsequently, a comprehensive study of the question by Amsterdam economist Gerwin Griffioen concludes that: "for the U.S., Japanese and most Western European stock market indices the recursive out-of-sample forecasting procedure does not show to be profitable, after implementing little transaction costs. Moreover, for sufficiently high transaction costs it is found, by estimating CAPMs, that technical trading shows no statistically significant risk-corrected out-of-sample forecasting power for almost all of the stock market indices." Transaction costs are particularly applicable to "momentum strategies"; a comprehensive 1996 review of the data and studies concluded that even small transaction costs would lead to an inability to capture any excess from such strategies.
In a 2000 paper published in the Journal of Finance, professor Andrew W. Lo of MIT, working with Harry Mamaysky and Jiang Wang found that:
Technical analysis, also known as "charting", has been a part of financial practice for many decades, but this discipline has not received the same level of academic scrutiny and acceptance as more traditional approaches such as fundamental analysis. One of the main obstacles is the highly subjective nature of technical analysis – the presence of geometric shapes in historical price charts is often in the eyes of the beholder. In this paper, we propose a systematic and automatic approach to technical pattern recognition using nonparametric kernel regression, and apply this method to a large number of U.S. stocks from 1962 to 1996 to evaluate the effectiveness of technical analysis. By comparing the unconditional empirical distribution of daily stock returns to the conditional distribution – conditioned on specific technical indicators such as head-and-shoulders or double-bottoms – we find that over the 31-year sample period, several technical indicators do provide incremental information and may have some practical value.
In that same paper Lo wrote that "several academic studies suggest that ... technical analysis may well be an effective means for extracting useful information from market prices." Some techniques such as Drummond Geometry attempt to overcome the past data bias by projecting support and resistance levels from differing time frames into the near-term future and combining that with reversion to the mean techniques.
Efficient-market hypothesis
The efficient-market hypothesis (EMH) contradicts the basic tenets of technical analysis by stating that past prices cannot be used to profitably predict future prices. Thus it holds that technical analysis cannot be effective. Economist Eugene Fama published the seminal paper on the EMH in the Journal of Finance in 1970, and said "In short, the evidence in support of the efficient markets model is extensive, and (somewhat uniquely in economics) contradictory evidence is sparse."
However, because future stock prices can be strongly influenced by investor expectations, technicians claim it only follows that past prices influence future prices. They also point to research in the field of behavioral finance, specifically that people are not the rational participants EMH makes them out to be. Technicians have long said that irrational human behavior influences stock prices, and that this behavior leads to predictable outcomes. Author David Aronson says that the theory of behavioral finance blends with the practice of technical analysis:
By considering the impact of emotions, cognitive errors, irrational preferences, and the dynamics of group behavior, behavioral finance offers succinct explanations of excess market volatility as well as the excess returns earned by stale information strategies.... cognitive errors may also explain the existence of market inefficiencies that spawn the systematic price movements that allow objective TA methods to work.
EMH advocates reply that while individual market participants do not always act rationally (or have complete information), their aggregate decisions balance each other, resulting in a rational outcome (optimists who buy stock and bid the price higher are countered by pessimists who sell their stock, which keeps the price in equilibrium). Likewise, complete information is reflected in the price because all market participants bring their own individual, but incomplete, knowledge together in the market.
Random walk hypothesis
The random walk hypothesis may be derived from the weak-form efficient markets hypothesis, which is based on the assumption that market participants take full account of any information contained in past price movements (but not necessarily other public information). In his book A Random Walk Down Wall Street, Princeton economist Burton Malkiel said that technical forecasting tools such as pattern analysis must ultimately be self-defeating: "The problem is that once such a regularity is known to market participants, people will act in such a way that prevents it from happening in the future." Malkiel has stated that while momentum may explain some stock price movements, there is not enough momentum to make excess profits. Malkiel has compared technical analysis to "astrology".
In the late 1980s, professors Andrew Lo and Craig McKinlay published a paper which cast doubt on the random walk hypothesis. In a 1999 response to Malkiel, Lo and McKinlay collected empirical papers that questioned the hypothesis' applicability that suggested a non-random and possibly predictive component to stock price movement, though they were careful to point out that rejecting random walk does not necessarily invalidate EMH, which is an entirely separate concept from RWH. In a 2000 paper, Andrew Lo back-analyzed data from the U.S. from 1962 to 1996 and found that "several technical indicators do provide incremental information and may have some practical value". Burton Malkiel dismissed the irregularities mentioned by Lo and McKinlay as being too small to profit from.
Technicians argue that the EMH and random walk theories both ignore the realities of markets, in that participants are not completely rational and that current price moves are not independent of previous moves. Some signal processing researchers negate the random walk hypothesis that stock market prices resemble Wiener processes, because the statistical moments of such processes and real stock data vary significantly with respect to window size and similarity measure. They argue that feature transformations used for the description of audio and biosignals can also be used to predict stock market prices successfully which would contradict the random walk hypothesis.
The random walk index (RWI) is a technical indicator that attempts to determine if a stock's price movement is random in nature or a result of a statistically significant trend. The random walk index attempts to determine when the market is in a strong uptrend or downtrend by measuring price ranges over N and how it differs from what would be expected by a random walk (randomly going up or down). The greater the range suggests a stronger trend.
Applying Kahneman and Tversky's prospect theory to price movements, Paul V. Azzopardi provided a possible explanation why fear makes prices fall sharply while greed pushes up prices gradually. This commonly observed behaviour of securities prices is sharply at odds with random walk. By gauging greed and fear in the market, investors can better formulate long and short portfolio stances.
Scientific technical analysis
Caginalp and Balenovich in 1994 used their asset-flow differential equations model to show that the major patterns of technical analysis could be generated with some basic assumptions. Some of the patterns such as a triangle continuation or reversal pattern can be generated with the assumption of two distinct groups of investors with different assessments of valuation. The major assumptions of the models are the finiteness of assets and the use of trend as well as valuation in decision making. Many of the patterns follow as mathematically logical consequences of these assumptions.
One of the problems with conventional technical analysis has been the difficulty of specifying the patterns in a manner that permits objective testing.
Japanese candlestick patterns involve patterns of a few days that are within an uptrend or downtrend. Caginalp and Laurent were the first to perform a successful large scale test of patterns. A mathematically precise set of criteria were tested by first using a definition of a short-term trend by smoothing the data and allowing for one deviation in the smoothed trend. They then considered eight major three-day candlestick reversal patterns in a non-parametric manner and defined the patterns as a set of inequalities. The results were positive with an overwhelming statistical confidence for each of the patterns using the data set of all S&P 500 stocks daily for the five-year period 1992–1996.
Among the most basic ideas of conventional technical analysis is that a trend, once established, tends to continue. However, testing for this trend has often led researchers to conclude that stocks are a random walk. One study, performed by Poterba and Summers, found a small trend effect that was too small to be of trading value. As Fisher Black noted, "noise" in trading price data makes it difficult to test hypotheses.
One method for avoiding this noise was discovered in 1995 by Caginalp and Constantine who used a ratio of two essentially identical closed-end funds to eliminate any changes in valuation. A closed-end fund (unlike an open-end fund) trades independently of its net asset value and its shares cannot be redeemed, but only traded among investors as any other stock on the exchanges. In this study, the authors found that the best estimate of tomorrow's price is not yesterday's price (as the efficient-market hypothesis would indicate), nor is it the pure momentum price (namely, the same relative price change from yesterday to today continues from today to tomorrow). But rather it is almost exactly halfway between the two.
Starting from the characterization of the past time evolution of market prices in terms of price velocity and price acceleration, an attempt towards a general framework for technical analysis has been developed, with the goal of establishing a principled classification of the possible patterns characterizing the deviation or defects from the random walk market state and its time translational invariant properties. The classification relies on two dimensionless parameters, the Froude number characterizing the relative strength of the acceleration with respect to the velocity and the time horizon forecast dimensionalized to the training period. Trend-following and contrarian patterns are found to coexist and depend on the dimensionless time horizon. Using a renormalisation group approach, the probabilistic based scenario approach exhibits statistically significant predictive power in essentially all tested market phases.
A survey of modern studies by Park and Irwin showed that most found a positive result from technical analysis.
In 2011, Caginalp and DeSantis have used large data sets of closed-end funds, where comparison with valuation is possible, in order to determine quantitatively whether key aspects of technical analysis such as trend and resistance have scientific validity. Using data sets of over 100,000 points they demonstrate that trend has an effect that is at least half as important as valuation. The effects of volume and volatility, which are smaller, are also evident and statistically significant. An important aspect of their work involves the nonlinear effect of trend. Positive trends that occur within approximately 3.7 standard deviations have a positive effect. For stronger uptrends, there is a negative effect on returns, suggesting that profit taking occurs as the magnitude of the uptrend increases. For downtrends the situation is similar except that the "buying on dips" does not take place until the downtrend is a 4.6 standard deviation event. These methods can be used to examine investor behavior and compare the underlying strategies among different asset classes.
In 2013, Kim Man Lui and T Chong pointed out that the past findings on technical analysis mostly reported the profitability of specific trading rules for a given set of historical data. These past studies had not taken the human trader into consideration as no real-world trader would mechanically adopt signals from any technical analysis method. Therefore, to unveil the truth of technical analysis, we should get back to understand the performance between experienced and novice traders. If the market really walks randomly, there will be no difference between these two kinds of traders. However, it is found by experiment that traders who are more knowledgeable on technical analysis significantly outperform those who are less knowledgeable.
Ticker-tape reading
Main article: Ticker tapeUntil the mid-1960s, tape reading was a popular form of technical analysis. It consisted of reading market information such as price, volume, order size, and so on from a paper strip which ran through a machine called a stock ticker. Market data was sent to brokerage houses and to the homes and offices of the most active speculators. This system fell into disuse with the advent of electronic information panels in the late 60's, and later computers, which allow for the easy preparation of charts.
Jesse Livermore, one of the most successful stock market operators of all time, was primarily concerned with ticker tape reading since a young age. He followed his own (mechanical) trading system (he called it the 'market key'), which did not need charts, but was relying solely on price data. He described his market key in detail in his 1940s book 'How to Trade in Stocks'. Livermore's system was determining market phases (trend, correction etc.) via past price data. He also made use of volume data (which he estimated from how stocks behaved and via 'market testing', a process of testing market liquidity via sending in small market orders), as described in his 1940s book.
Quotation board
Another form of technical analysis used so far was via interpretation of stock market data contained in quotation boards, that in the times before electronic screens, were huge chalkboards located in the stock exchanges, with data of the main financial assets listed on exchanges for analysis of their movements. It was manually updated with chalk, with the updates regarding some of these data being transmitted to environments outside of exchanges (such as brokerage houses, bucket shops, etc.) via the aforementioned tape, telegraph, telephone and later telex.
This analysis tool was used both, on the spot, mainly by market professionals, as well as by general public through the printed versions in newspapers showing the data of the negotiations of the previous day, for swing and position trades.
Charting terms and indicators
Concepts
- Average true range – averaged daily trading range, adjusted for price gaps.
- Breakout – the concept whereby prices forcefully penetrate an area of prior support or resistance, usually, but not always, accompanied by an increase in volume.
- Chart pattern – distinctive pattern created by the movement of security or commodity prices on a chart
- Cycles – time targets for potential change in price action (price only moves up, down, or sideways)
- Dead cat bounce – the phenomenon whereby a spectacular decline in the price of a stock is immediately followed by a moderate and temporary rise before resuming its downward movement
- Elliott wave principle and the golden ratio to calculate successive price movements and retracements
- Fibonacci ratios – used as a guide to determine support and resistance and retracement percentages
- Momentum – the rate of price change
- Point and figure analysis – A priced-based analytical approach employing numerical filters which may incorporate time references, though ignores time entirely in its construction
- Resistance – a price level that may prompt a net increase of selling activity
- Support – a price level that may prompt a net increase of buying activity
- Trending – the phenomenon by which price movement tends to persist in one direction for an extended period of time
Types of charts
- Candlestick chart – Of Japanese origin and similar to OHLC, candlesticks widen and fill the interval between the open and close prices to emphasize the open/close relationship. In the West, often black or red candle bodies represent a close lower than the open, while white, green or blue candles represent a close higher than the open price.
- Line chart – Connects the closing price values with line segments. You can also choose to draw the line chart using open, high or low price.
- Open-high-low-close chart – OHLC charts, also known as bar charts, plot the span between the high and low prices of a trading period as a vertical line segment at the trading time, and the open and close prices with horizontal tick marks on the range line, usually a tick to the left for the open price and a tick to the right for the closing price.
- Point and figure chart – a chart type employing numerical filters with only passing references to time, and which ignores time entirely in its construction.
Overlays
Overlays are generally superimposed over the main price chart.
- Bollinger bands – a range of price volatility
- Channel – a pair of parallel trend lines
- Ichimoku kinko hyo – a moving average-based system that factors in time and the average point between a candle's high and low
- Moving average – an average over a window of time before and after a given time point that is repeated at each time point in the given chart. A moving average can be thought of as a kind of dynamic trend-line.
- Parabolic SAR – Wilder's trailing stop based on prices tending to stay within a parabolic curve during a strong trend
- Pivot point – derived by calculating the numerical average of a particular currency's or stock's high, low and closing prices
- Resistance – a price level that may act as a ceiling above price
- Support – a price level that may act as a floor below price
- Trend line – a sloping line described by at least two peaks or two troughs
- Zig Zag – This chart overlay that shows filtered price movements that are greater than a given percentage.
Breadth indicators
These indicators are based on statistics derived from the broad market.
- Advance–decline line – a popular indicator of market breadth.
- McClellan Oscillator – a popular closed-form indicator of breadth.
- McClellan Summation Index – a popular open-form indicator of breadth.
Price-based indicators
These indicators are generally shown below or above the main price chart.
- Average directional index – a widely used indicator of trend strength.
- Commodity channel index – identifies cyclical trends.
- MACD – moving average convergence/divergence.
- Momentum – the rate of price change.
- Relative strength index (RSI) – oscillator showing price strength.
- Relative Vigor Index (RVI) – oscillator measures the conviction of a recent price action and the likelihood that it will continue.
- Stochastic oscillator – close position within recent trading range.
- Trix – an oscillator showing the slope of a triple-smoothed exponential moving average.
- Vortex Indicator – an indicator used to identify the existence, continuation, initiation or termination of trends.
Volume-based indicators
- Accumulation/distribution index – based on the close within the day's range.
- Money flow index – the amount of stock traded on days the price went up.
- On-balance volume – the momentum of buying and selling stocks.
Trading with Mixing Indicators
- MACD & Average directional index
- MACD & Super Trend
- MACD & Moving average
- MACD & RSI
- MACD & Moving Averages
See also
- Algorithmic trading
- Apophenia
- Behavioral finance
- Certified Financial Technician / Master of Financial Technical Analysis
- Chartered Market Technician
- Clustering illusion
- Financial signal processing
- Market analysis
- Market timing
- Mathematical finance
- Multimedia information retrieval
- Multiple comparisons problem
- Overfitting
- Price action trading
- Texas sharpshooter fallacy
- William Peter Hamilton
References
- ^ Kirkpatrick & Dahlquist (2006), p. 3
- Andrew W. Lo; Jasmina Hasanhodzic (2010). The Evolution of Technical Analysis: Financial Prediction from Babylonian Tablets to Bloomberg Terminals. Bloomberg Press. p. 150. ISBN 978-1576603499. Retrieved 8 August 2011.
- ^ Irwin, Scott H.; Park, Cheol-Ho (2007). "What Do We Know About the Profitability of Technical Analysis?". Journal of Economic Surveys. 21 (4): 786–826. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00519.x. S2CID 154488391.
- ^ Osler, Karen (July 2000). "Support for Resistance: Technical Analysis and Intraday Exchange Rates," FRBNY Economic Policy Review (abstract and paper here).
- ^ Lo, Andrew W.; Mamaysky, Harry; Wang, Jiang (2000). "Foundations of Technical Analysis: Computational Algorithms, Statistical Inference, and Empirical Implementation". Journal of Finance. 55 (4): 1705–1765. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.134.1546. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00265.
- Joseph de la Vega, Confusión de Confusiones, 1688
- Nison, Steve (1991). Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques. New York Institute of Finance. pp. 15–18. ISBN 978-0-13-931650-0.
- Nison, Steve (1994). Beyond Candlesticks: New Japanese Charting Techniques Revealed, John Wiley and Sons, p. 14. ISBN 0-471-00720-X
- Paul V. Azzopardi, "Behavioral Technical Analysis", ibid
- ^ Murphy, John J. Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets. New York Institute of Finance, 1999, pp. 1–5, 24–31. ISBN 0-7352-0066-1
- "PrimePair.com Head and Shoulders Pattern". Archived from the original on 6 January 2015. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
- Elder (1993), Part III: Classical Chart Analysis
- Elder (1993), Part II: "Mass Psychology"; Chapter 17: "Managing versus Forecasting", pp. 65–68
- ^ Wilmott, Paul (2007). "Appendix B, esp p. 628". Paul Wilmott Introduces Quantitative Finance. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-31958-1.
- Akston, Dr. Hugh (13 January 2009). "Beating the Quants at Their Own Game".
- Elder (2008), Chapter 1 – section "Trend vs Counter-Trending Trading"
- "Beware of the Stock Market as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy".
- ^ Kahn, Michael N. (2006). Technical Analysis Plain and Simple: Charting the Markets in Your Language, Financial Times Press, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, p. 80. ISBN 0-13-134597-4.
- Baiynd, Anne-Marie (2011). The Trading Book: A Complete Solution to Mastering Technical Systems and Trading Psychology. McGraw-Hill. p. 272. ISBN 9780071766494. Archived from the original on 25 March 2012. Retrieved 30 April 2013.
- Kirkpatrick & Dahlquist (2006), p. 87
- Kirkpatrick & Dahlquist (2006), p. 86
- Technical Analysis: The Complete Resource for Financial Market Technicians, p. 7
- "Home – Australian Technical Analysts Association".
- "Home".
- "CMT Association Knowledge Base". Archived from the original on 14 October 2017. Retrieved 16 August 2017.
- Wiley (2021). CMT Level I 2021: An Introduction to Technical Analysis. Wiley. ISBN 978-1119768050.
- K. Funahashi, On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks, Neural Networks vol 2, 1989
- K. Hornik, Multilayer feed-forward networks are universal approximators, Neural Networks, vol 2, 1989
- R. Lawrence. Using Neural Networks to Forecast Stock Market Prices
- B.Egeli et al. Stock Market Prediction Using Artificial Neural Networks Archived 20 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine
- M. Zekić. Neural Network Applications in Stock Market Predictions – A Methodology Analysis Archived 24 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine
- Taken from p.145 of Yeates, L.B., Thought Experimentation: A Cognitive Approach, Graduate Diploma in Arts (By Research) dissertation, University of New South Wales, 2004.
- Elder (1993), pp. 54, 116–118
- Elder (1993)
- ltd, Research and Markets. "The Capital Growth Letter – Research and Markets".
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 12 January 2009. Retrieved 31 August 2007.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - "SFO". Archived from the original on 6 October 2007. Retrieved 27 August 2007.
- Browning, E.S. (31 July 2007). "Reading market tea leaves". The Wall Street Journal Europe. Dow Jones. pp. 17–18.
- Skabar, Cloete, Networks, Financial Trading and the Efficient Markets Hypothesis Archived 18 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine
- Nauzer J. Balsara, Gary Chen and Lin Zheng "The Chinese Stock Market: An Examination of the Random Walk Model and Technical Trading Rules" The Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, Spring 2007
- Brock, William, et al. “Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns.” The Journal of Finance, vol. 47, no. 5, 1992, pp. 1731–64. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2328994. Accessed 8 Dec. 2024.
- Sullivan, R.; Timmermann, A.; White, H. (1999). "Data-Snooping, Technical Trading Rule Performance, and the Bootstrap". The Journal of Finance. 54 (5): 1647–1691. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.50.7908. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00163.
- Griffioen, Technical Analysis in Financial Markets
- Chan, L.K.C.; Jegadeesh, N.; Lakonishok, J. (1996). "Momentum Strategies". The Journal of Finance. 51 (5): 1681–1713. doi:10.2307/2329534. JSTOR 2329534.
- David Keller, "Breakthroughs in Technical Analysis; New Thinking from the World's Top Minds," New York, Bloomberg Press, 2007, ISBN 978-1-57660-242-3 pp.1–19
- Eugene Fama, "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," The Journal of Finance, volume 25, issue 2 (May 1970), pp. 383–417.
- ^ Aronson, David R. (2006). Evidence-Based Technical Analysis, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, pages 357, 355–356, 342. ISBN 978-0-470-00874-4.
- Prechter, Robert R Jr; Parker, Wayne D (2007). "The Financial/Economic Dichotomy in Social Behavioral Dynamics: The Socionomic Perspective". Journal of Behavioral Finance. 8 (2): 84–108. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.615.763. doi:10.1080/15427560701381028. S2CID 55114691.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Clarke, J., T. Jandik, and Gershon Mandelker (2001). "The efficient markets hypothesis," Expert Financial Planning: Advice from Industry Leaders, ed. R. Arffa, 126–141. New York: Wiley & Sons.
- Burton Malkiel, A Random Walk Down Wall Street, W. W. Norton & Company (April 2003) p. 168.
- ^ Robert Huebscher. Burton Malkiel Talks the Random Walk. 7 July 2009.
- Lo, Andrew; MacKinlay, Craig. A Non-Random Walk Down Wall Street, Princeton University Press, 1999. ISBN 978-0-691-05774-3
- Poser, Steven W. (2003). Applying Elliott Wave Theory Profitably, John Wiley and Sons, p. 71. ISBN 0-471-42007-7.
- Eidenberger, Horst (2011). "Fundamental Media Understanding" Atpress. ISBN 978-3-8423-7917-6.
- "AsiaPacFinance.com Trading Indicator Glossary". Archived from the original on 1 September 2011. Retrieved 1 August 2011.
- Azzopardi, Paul V. (2012), "Why Financial Markets Rise Slowly but Fall Sharply: Analysing market behaviour with behavioural finance", Harriman House, ASIN: B00B0Y6JIC
- "Fear & Greed Index - Investor Sentiment".
- Gunduz Caginalp; Donald Balenovich (2003). "A theoretical foundation for technical analysis" (PDF). Journal of Technical Analysis. 59: 5–22. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 11 May 2015.
- Caginalp, G.; Laurent, H. (1998). "The Predictive Power of Price Patterns". Applied Mathematical Finance. 5 (3–4): 181–206. doi:10.1080/135048698334637. S2CID 44237914.
- Poterba, J.M.; Summers, L.H. (1988). "Mean reversion in stock prices: Evidence and Implications". Journal of Financial Economics. 22: 27–59. doi:10.1016/0304-405x(88)90021-9. S2CID 18901605.
- Black, F (1986). "Noise". Journal of Finance. 41 (3): 529–43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04513.x.
- Caginalp, G.; Constantine, G. (1995). "Statistical inference and modeling of momentum in stock prices". Applied Mathematical Finance. 2 (4): 225–242. doi:10.1080/13504869500000012. S2CID 154176805.
- J. V. Andersen, S. Gluzman and D. Sornette, Fundamental Framework for Technical Analysis, European Physical Journal B 14, 579–601 (2000)
- C-H Park and S.H. Irwin, "The Profitability of Technical Analysis: A Review" AgMAS Project Research Report No. 2004-04
- G. Caginalp and M. DeSantis, "Nonlinearity in the dynamics of financial markets," Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 12(2), 1140–1151, 2011.
- K.M. Lui and T.T.L Chong, "Do Technical Analysts Outperform Novice Traders: Experimental Evidence" Economics Bulletin. 33(4), 3080–3087, 2013.
- Livermore (1940)
- Lefèvre (2000), pp. 1, 18
- Lefèvre (2000), p. 17
- Livermore (1940), pp. 17–18
Bibliography
- Elder, Alexander (1993). Trading for a Living; Psychology, Trading Tactics, Money Management. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-47159224-2.
- Kirkpatrick, Charles D.; Dahlquist, Julie R. (2006). Technical Analysis: The Complete Resource for Financial Market Technicians. Financial Times Press. ISBN 978-0-13-153113-0.
- Lefèvre, Edwin (2000) . Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: With new Commentary and Insights on the Life and Times of Jesse Livermore. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9780470481592.
- Livermore, Jesse Lauriston (1940). How to Trade in Stocks. Duell, Sloan & Pearce NY.
Further reading
- Azzopardi, Paul V. Behavioural Technical Analysis: An introduction to behavioural finance and its role in technical analysis. Harriman House, 2010. ISBN 978-1905641413
- Colby, Robert W. The Encyclopedia of Technical Market Indicators. 2nd Edition. McGraw Hill, 2003. ISBN 0-07-012057-9
- Covel, Michael. The Complete Turtle Trader. HarperCollins, 2007. ISBN 9780061241703
- Douglas, Mark. The Disciplined Trader. New York Institute of Finance, 1990. ISBN 0-13-215757-8
- Edwards, Robert D.; Magee, John; Bassetti, W.H.C. Technical Analysis of Stock Trends, 9th Edition (Hardcover). American Management Association, 2007. ISBN 0-8493-3772-0
- Fox, Justin. The Myth of the Rational Market. HarperCollings, 2009. ISBN 9780060598990
- Hurst, J. M. The Profit Magic of Stock Transaction Timing. Prentice-Hall, 1972. ISBN 0-13-726018-0
- Neill, Humphrey B. Tape Reading & Market Tactics. First edition of 1931. Market Place 2007 reprint ISBN 1592802621
- Neill, Humphrey B. The Art of Contrary Thinking. Caxton Press 1954.
- Pring, Martin J. Technical Analysis Explained: The Successful Investor's Guide to Spotting Investment Trends and Turning Points. McGraw Hill, 2002. ISBN 0-07-138193-7
- Raschke, Linda Bradford; Connors, Lawrence A. Street Smarts: High Probability Short-Term Trading Strategies. M. Gordon Publishing Group, 1995. ISBN 0-9650461-0-9
- Rollo Tape & Wyckoff, Richard D. Studies in Tape Reading The Ticker Publishing Co. NY 1910.
- Tharp, Van K. Definitive Guide to Position Sizing International Institute of Trading Mastery, 2008. ISBN 0935219099
- Wilder, J. Welles. New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems. Trend Research, 1978. ISBN 0-89459-027-8
- Ladis Konecny, Stocks and Exchange – the only Book you need, 2013, ISBN 9783848220656, technical analysis = chapter 8.
- Schabackers, Richard W. Stock Market Theory and Practice, 2011. ISBN 9781258159474
External links
- International and national organizations
- International Federation of Technical Analysts
- Singapore: Technical Analysts Society (Singapore)
- United States: CMT Association
- United Kingdom: Society of Technical Analysts
Technical analysis | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Concepts | |||||||||||||||
Charts | |||||||||||||||
Patterns |
| ||||||||||||||
Indicators |
| ||||||||||||||
Analysts |