Misplaced Pages

Libertarianism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:40, 23 April 2006 editIrgendwer (talk | contribs)569 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:27, 9 January 2025 edit undoNobody89898989 (talk | contribs)19 editsm Libertarianism 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Political philosophy based on liberty}}
{{combi}}
{{hatnote group|
|{{Libertarianism}}
|{{liberalism}} {{other uses}}
{{redirect|Libertarians|political parties|List of libertarian political parties}}
|}
}}
:''This article is about the ] ] philosophy that strongly emphasizes ] rights conjoined with ]. ] and ] agree with libertarian philosophy in their respective areas, but may disagree on other issues. For the libertarian political philosophy favoring socialism, see ] or ]. The article "]" deals with a conception of free will.''
{{distinguish|Liberalism}}
{{use dmy dates|date=December 2018}}
{{libertarianism sidebar|all}}'''Libertarianism''' (from {{langx|fr|libertaire}}, itself from the {{langx|la|libertas|lit=freedom}}) is a ] that holds freedom and ] as primary values.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wolff |first1=Jonathan |title=Libertarianism |journal=] |date=2016 |location=London |doi=10.4324/9780415249126-S036-1 |isbn=9780415250696 |doi-access=}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Vossen |first1=Bas Van Der |title=Libertarianism |journal=Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics |date=2017 |doi=10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.86 |isbn=978-0-19-022863-7 |doi-access=}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mack |first1=Eric |editor-first1=George |editor-last1=Klosko |title=Libertarianism |journal=The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy |date=2011 |pages=673–688 |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238804.003.0041}}</ref><ref name="Boaz">{{cite encyclopedia|title=Libertarianism|url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/339321/libertarianism|encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica|author=Boaz, David|author-link=David Boaz|date=30 January 2009|access-date=21 February 2017|quote=ibertarianism, political philosophy that takes individual liberty to be the primary political value.|archive-date=4 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150504222253/https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/339321/libertarianism|url-status=live}}</ref> Many libertarians conceive of freedom in accord with the ], according to which each individual has the right to live as they choose, so long as it does not involve violating the rights of others by initiating force or fraud against them.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.libertarianism.org/topics/non-aggression-principle|access-date=23 November 2024 |title=Non-Aggression Principle|quote=There are a small group of libertarians who do not accept the non- aggression axiom.}}</ref>


Libertarians advocate for the expansion of individual ] and political ], emphasizing the principles of ] and the protection of ], including the rights to ], ], ] and ].<ref name="Boaz" /><ref>{{cite book|last=Woodcock|first=George|title=Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements|orig-date=1962|year=2004|publisher=Broadview Press|location=Peterborough|isbn=978-1551116297|page=16|quote=or the very nature of the libertarian attitude—its rejection of dogma, its deliberate avoidance of rigidly systematic theory, and, above all, its stress on extreme freedom of choice and on the primacy of the individual judgement {{sic}}.|title-link=Anarchism (Woodcock book)}}</ref> They generally support individual liberty and oppose ], ] power, ]fare, ] and ], but some libertarians diverge on the scope and nature of their opposition to existing ] and ]s.
'''Libertarianism''' is an ] advocating that individuals should be free to do whatever they wish with their ] or ], as long as they do not infringe on the same liberty of others. Libertarians hold as a fundamental maxim that all human interaction should be voluntary and consensual. They maintain that the initiation of physical force against another ] or his ], the threat of initiating it, or the commission of ] against any person, is a violation of that principle. Force used against others is considered by libertarians to be illegitimate except in retaliation for initiatory aggressions.


Schools of libertarian thought offer a range of views regarding the legitimate functions of state and non-state ]. Different categorizations have been used to distinguish these various forms of libertarianism.<ref name="Long1">Long, Joseph. W (1996). "Toward a Libertarian Theory of Class". ''Social Philosophy and Policy''. '''15''' (2): 310. "When I speak of 'libertarianism' I mean all three of these very different movements. It might be protested that LibCap , LibSoc and LibPop are too different from one another to be treated as aspects of a single point of view. But they do share a common—or at least an overlapping—intellectual ancestry."</ref><ref name="Carlson1">Carlson, Jennifer D. (2012). "Libertarianism". In Miller, Wilburn R., ed. ''The Social History of Crime and Punishment in America''. London: SAGE Publications. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930075224/https://books.google.com/books?id=tYME6Z35nyAC&pg=PA1006&dq=right-libertarianism&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjVoNT9_uvlAhWN6aQKHWZ6AUUQ6AEINjAB#v=onepage&q=There%20exist%20three%20major%20camps%20in%20libertarian%20thought%3A%20right-libertarianism%2C%20socialist%20libertarianism%2C%20and%20left-libertarianism%3B%20the%20extent%20to%20which%20these%20represent%20distinct%20ideologies%20as%20opposed%20to%20variations%20on%20a%20theme%20is%20contested%20by%20scholars.&f=false |date=30 September 2020 }}. {{ISBN|1412988764}}. "There exist three major camps in libertarian thought: right-libertarianism, socialist libertarianism, and left-libertarianism; the extent to which these represent distinct ideologies as opposed to variations on a theme is contested by scholars."</ref> Scholars have identified distinct libertarian perspectives on the nature of ] and ], typically delineating them along ] or ]–] axes.<ref name="Francis">{{cite journal|last1=Francis|first1=Mark|title=Human Rights and Libertarians|journal=]|volume=29|issue=3|pages=462–472|date=December 1983|doi=10.1111/j.1467-8497.1983.tb00212.x|issn=0004-9522}}</ref> Libertarianism has been broadly shaped by ] ideas. <ref name=":0" />


== Origins of political libertarianism ==
In the mid-19th century,<ref name="Dejacque" /> libertarianism originated as a form of ] and ] politics usually seen as being on the left (like ] and ]<ref>Long, Roderick T. (2012). "The Rise of Social Anarchism". In Gaus, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred, eds. ''The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy''. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930075228/https://books.google.com/books?id=advfCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA223&dq=In+the+meantime%2C+anarchist+theories+of+a+more+communist+or+collectivist+character+had+bee+developing+as+well.+One+important+pioneer+is+French+anarcho-communists+Joseph+D%C3%A9jacque+%281821%E2%80%931864%29%2C&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ3vmnxsrmAhWTbsAKHQHXA5AQ6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=In%20the%20meantime%2C%20anarchist%20theories%20of%20a%20more%20communist%20or%20collectivist%20character%20had%20bee%20developing%20as%20well.%20One%20important%20pioneer%20is%20French%20anarcho-communists%20Joseph%20D%C3%A9jacque%20(1821%E2%80%931864)%2C&f=false |date=30 September 2020 }}. "In the meantime, anarchist theories of a more communist or collectivist character had been developing as well. One important pioneer is French anarcho-communist Joseph Déjacque (1821–1864), who appears to have been the first thinker to adopt the term 'libertarian' for this position; hence 'libertarianism' initially denoted a communist rather than a free-market ideology."</ref> especially ],<ref>Long, Roderick T. (2012). "Anarchism". In Gaus, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred, eds. ''The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy''. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930075228/https://books.google.com/books?id=advfCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA223&dq=In+the+meantime%2C+anarchist+theories+of+a+more+communist+or+collectivist+character+had+bee+developing+as+well.+One+important+pioneer+is+French+anarcho-communists+Joseph+D%C3%A9jacque+%281821%E2%80%931864%29%2C&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ3vmnxsrmAhWTbsAKHQHXA5AQ6AEIKjAA#v=snippet&q=In%20its%20oldest%20sense%2C%20it%20is%20a%20synonym%20either%20for%20anarchism%20in%20general%20or%20social%20anarchism%20in%20particular&f=false |date=30 September 2020 }}. "In its oldest sense, it is a synonym either for anarchism in general or social anarchism in particular."</ref> but more generally ]/] and ]).<ref name="RothbardBetrayal">{{cite book|last1=Rothbard|first1=Murray|url=https://cdn.mises.org/The%20Betrayal%20of%20the%20American%20Right_2.pdf|title=The Betrayal of the American Right|orig-date=2007|year=2009|publisher=Mises Institute|isbn=978-1610165013|page=83|quote=One gratifying aspect of our rise to some prominence is that, for the first time in my memory, we, 'our side,' had captured a crucial word from the enemy. 'Libertarians' had long been simply a polite word for left-wing anarchists, that is for anti-private property anarchists, either of the communist or syndicalist variety. But now we had taken it over.|access-date=10 November 2019|archive-date=21 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191221173352/https://cdn.mises.org/The%20Betrayal%20of%20the%20American%20Right_2.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Marshall"/> Along with seeking to abolish or reduce the power of the State, these libertarians sought to ] and ] of the ], or else to restrict their purview or effects to ] property norms, in favor of ] or ] and ], viewing private property in the means of production as a barrier to freedom and liberty.{{refn|<ref name="Kropotkin">{{cite book|title=Anarchism: A Collection of Revolutionary Writings|last=Kropotkin|first=Peter|publisher=Courier Dover Publications|year=1927|isbn=978-0486119861|page=150|quote=It attacks not only capital, but also the main sources of the power of capitalism: law, authority, and the State.}}</ref><ref name="Otero">{{cite book|title=Radical Priorities|last=Otero|first=Carlos Peregrin|publisher=]|others=Chomsky, Noam Chomsky|year=2003|isbn=1902593693|editor-last=Otero|editor-first=Carlos Peregrin|edition=3rd|location=Oakland, California|page=26|chapter=Introduction to Chomsky's Social Theory}}</ref><ref name="Chomsky 2003">{{cite book|title=Radical Priorities|last=Chomsky|first=Noam|publisher=]|year=2003|isbn=1902593693|editor=Carlos Peregrin Otero|edition=3rd|location=Oakland, California|pages=227–228}}<!-- Verified 22 November 2011. --></ref><ref name="Carlson p. 1006">Carlson, Jennifer D. (2012). "Libertarianism". In Miller, Wilbur R. ''The Social History of Crime and Punishment in America: An Encyclopedia''. SAGE Publications. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191221173347/https://books.google.it/books?id=tYME6Z35nyAC&pg=PA1006&dq=right-libertarianism&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjVoNT9_uvlAhWN6aQKHWZ6AUUQ6AEINjAB |date=21 December 2019 }}. "ocialist libertarians view any concentration of power into the hands of a few (whether politically or economically) as antithetical to freedom and thus advocate for the simultaneous abolition of both government and capitalism".</ref>}}


== Growth of the libertarian movement ==
==Principles==
In the mid-20th century, American{{refn|<ref name="Goodway"/><ref name="Newman"/><ref name="Marshall p. 565"/><ref name="Carlson"/>}} proponents of ] and ] began using<ref name="RothbardBetrayal"/> the term ''libertarian''. Minarchists advocate for ]s which maintain only those functions of government necessary to safeguard natural rights, understood in terms of self-ownership or autonomy,<ref name=":3" /> while anarcho-capitalists advocate for the replacement of all state institutions with private alternatives.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Geloso |first1=Vincent |last2=Leeson |first2=Peter T. |date=2020 |title=Are Anarcho-Capitalists Insane? Medieval Icelandic Conflict Institutions in Comparative Perspective |url=https://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique-2020-6-page-957.htm |journal=Revue d'économie politique |language=en |volume=130 |issue=6 |pages=957–974 |doi=10.3917/redp.306.0115 |issn=0373-2630 |quote=Anarcho-capitalism is a variety of libertarianism according to which all government institutions can and should be replaced by private ones. |s2cid=235008718|doi-access=free}}</ref>
{{Political ideology entry points}}
{{main articles|] and ]}}


During this time period, the term "libertarian" became used by growing numbers of people to advocate '']'' ] and strong ] such as in land, infrastructure and natural resources.<ref name="Carlson"/><ref>{{cite book|last=Hussain|first=Syed B.|title=Encyclopedia of Capitalism, Volume 2|year=2004|publisher=Facts on File Inc|location=New York|isbn=0816052247|page=492|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FbVZAAAAYAAJ|quote=In the modern world, political ideologies are largely defined by their attitude towards capitalism. Marxists want to overthrow it, liberals to curtail it extensively, conservatives to curtail it moderately. Those who maintain that capitalism is an excellent economic system, unfairly maligned, with little or no need for corrective government policy, are generally known as libertarians.|access-date=31 October 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930075322/https://books.google.com/books?id=FbVZAAAAYAAJ|url-status=live}}</ref> This libertarianism, a revival of ],<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5wDQFBFM0FMC&pg=PA4 | title=Libertarianism: For and Against | isbn=978-0-7425-4259-4 | last1=Duncan | first1=Craig | last2=Machan | first2=Tibor R. | date=2 June 2024 | publisher=Rowman & Littlefield }}</ref> occurred due to other ] abandoning classical liberalism and embracing ] and ] in the early 20th century after the ] and with the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://fee.org/articles/who-is-a-libertarian/|title=Who is a libertarian?|last=Russell|first=Dean|year=1955|website=]|quote=Many of us call ourselves 'liberals.' And it is true that the word 'liberal' once described persons who respected the individual and feared the use of mass compulsions. But the leftists have now corrupted that once-proud term to identify themselves and their program of more government ownership of property and more controls over persons. As a result, those of us who believe in freedom must explain that when we call ourselves liberals, we mean liberals in the uncorrupted classical sense. At best, this is awkward and subject to misunderstanding. Here is a suggestion: Let those of us who love liberty trade-mark and reserve for our own use the good and honorable word 'libertarian'.}}</ref>
Libertarians believe that individuals in society should be allowed to organize themselves rather than organization be imposed by governmental authority, because imposed organization implies use of initial force. For ], they believe it should merely serve the role of a ] intervening only to adjudicate disputes and stop aggressions against individual liberty. They generally define liberty as the freedom to do whatever one wishes up to the point that one's behavior begins to interfere with another's person or property. At the point of interference, each party would become subject to certain principled rules for ], generally accepting that one who has demonstrated a proven lack of respect for the rights of others should be subject to sanctions, including possible constraints on their freedom, which is generally consistent with the basis for criminal law in most modern democratic societies.


Since the 1970s, this ] form of libertarianism has spread beyond the United States,<ref name="Teles & Kenney 2007">Teles, Steven; Kenney, Daniel A. "Spreading the Word: The Diffusion of American Conservatism in Europe and Beyond". In Kopsten, Jeffrey; Steinmo, Sven, eds. (2007). . ]. pp. 136–169.</ref> with ] being established in the ],<ref>{{Cite news |last=Singleton |first=Alex |date=30 May 2008 |title=How Libertarians undermine liberty |work=Daily Telegraph |url=http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/alexsingleton/4341751/How_Libertarians_undermine_liberty/ |url-status=dead |access-date=10 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090625210549/http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/alexsingleton/4341751/How_Libertarians_undermine_liberty/ |archive-date=25 June 2009}}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite news |last=Staff writer |author-link=Staff writer |date=24 March 2019 |title=Feiglin: Palestinians in Gaza had more rights under Israel |work=] |url=https://www.israelhayom.com/2019/03/24/today-on-the-israelections-program-moshe-feiglin/ |access-date=26 August 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Harkov |first=Lahav |date=17 March 2019 |title=The Feiglin phenomenon |url=https://www.jpost.com/Opinion/The-Feiglin-phenomenon-583567 |access-date=17 March 2019 |website=] |quote=The leader of the rising Zehut Party is attracting more than just young potheads to his libertarian platform.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Zehut |url=https://en.idi.org.il/israeli-elections-and-parties/parties/zehut/ |access-date=21 February 2019 |website=] |quote= and personal liberty. Its platform includes libertarian economic positions .}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Eglash |first=Ruth |date=4 April 2019 |title=A pro-pot party could tip the scales in Israel's upcoming election |newspaper=] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/a-pro-pot-party-could-tip-the-scales-in-israels-upcoming-election/2019/04/04/01060ec4-5617-11e9-aa83-504f086bf5d6_story.html |access-date=7 April 2019 |quote=Now you have two special-interest groups. What pulls them together is the strong libertarian, anti-state agenda that works well for both.}}</ref> ],<ref>Staden, Martin (2 December 2015). . ''Rational Standard''. Retrieved 20 September 2020.</ref> ], and many other countries.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2021/10/07/javier-milei-a-libertarian-may-be-elected-to-argentinas-congress|title=Javier Milei, a libertarian, may be elected to Argentina's congress|publisher=]|date=7 October 2021|access-date=21 November 2023}}</ref>
Libertarians generally defend the ideal of freedom from the perspective of how little one is constrained by authority, that is, how much one is ''allowed'' to do, which is referred to as ]. This ideal is distinguished from a view of freedom focused on how much one is ''able'' to do, which is termed ], a distinction first noted by ], and later described in fuller detail by ].


After the ], which caused many people to give up on Marxism or ], libertarian socialism also grew in popularity and influence, alongside left-wing ], ] and ] and ] movements.<ref name="rupert" />{{Sfn|Hahnel|2005|pp=138–139}}
Libertarians generally view arbitrary constraints imposed by the state on persons or their property, or ], as a violation of liberty. They tend to view the proper role of government as preserving liberty by defining and defending the equal rights of individuals to their respective freedom of thought and action. They see ] as appropriate for sanctioning those who harm others through force or fraud, but not appropriate for sanctioning those who have not harmed others. ] is an extreme version of libertarianism favoring no governmental constraints at all, based on the assumption that rulers and laws are unnecessary because in the absence of government individuals will form self-governing social bonds and rules.


In 2022, former student activist and self-described libertarian socialist ] became ] of ] after winning the ] with the {{lang|es|]|italic=no}} coalition.<ref name=":1">{{Cite news |title=A new group of left-wing presidents takes over in Latin America |newspaper=The Economist |url=https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2022/03/12/a-new-group-of-left-wing-presidents-takes-over-in-latin-america |access-date=2023-11-22 |issn=0013-0613}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite web |title=Can a rise of leftist leaders bring real change to Latin America? |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/program/the-stream/2022/3/23/can-a-rise-of-leftist-leaders-bring-real-change-to-latin-america |access-date=2023-11-22 |website=Al Jazeera |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":8">{{Cite news |last=Boyes |first=Roger |date=2023-11-22 |title=Biden risks losing Latin America to Beijing |newspaper=] |language=en |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/biden-risks-losing-latin-america-to-beijing-tcrl9c0zp |access-date=2023-11-22 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220614221555/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/biden-risks-losing-latin-america-to-beijing-tcrl9c0zp |archive-date=June 14, 2022 |issn=0140-0460}}</ref>
Many libertarians view ], ], and ] as the ultimate rights possessed by individuals, and that compromising one necessarily endangers the rest. In democracies, they consider compromise of these individual rights by political action to be "tyranny by the majority."


In November 2023, economist and television commentator ] was elected as the world's first self-identified Libertarian head of state<ref name="FoxMilei">{{cite web |last1=Unsworth |first1=David |title=Javier Milei crushes Argentine left, becomes world's first libertarian head of state |url=https://www.foxnews.com/world/javier-milei-crushes-argentine-left-becomes-worlds-first-libertarian-head-state |website=] |access-date=25 November 2023 |date=19 November 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url= https://reason.com/podcast/2023/11/20/the-worlds-first-libertarian-president/|title= The World's First Libertarian President|newspaper=]|access-date=2024-11-29|date=2023-11-20}}</ref> after winning an upset landslide in ] as the leader of the libertarian ] coalition.<ref name=":9">{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/argentina-readies-vote-likely-presidential-election-thriller-2023-11-19/|publisher=]|title=Argentine libertarian Milei pledges new political era after election win|date=20 November 2023|access-date=21 November 2023}}</ref>
Many libertarians favor ], which they see as less arbitrary and more adaptable than statutory laws. The relative benefits of common law evolving toward ever finer definitions of property rights were articulated by thinkers such as ], ], ], and ]. Some libertarian thinkers believe that this evolution would eventually define away various "commons" such as pollution or other interactions now viewed as ]. "A libertarian society would not allow anyone to injure others by pollution because it insists on individual responsibility."


== Overview ==
=== Rights and consequentialism ===
=== Etymology ===
Some libertarians such as ] and ] view the rights to life, liberty, and property as ], i.e., worthy of protection as an end in themselves. Their view of natural rights is derived, directly or indirectly, from the writings of ] and ]. ], another powerful influence on libertarianism, despite rejecting the label, also viewed these rights as based on ].
]'', a libertarian communist publication in New York City]]
The first recorded use of the term ''libertarian'' was in 1789, when ] wrote about ] in the context of metaphysics.<ref>{{cite book|author=William Belsham|title=Essays|publisher=C. Dilly|year=1789|postscript=Original from the University of Michigan, digitized 21 May 2007|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Z6Y0AAAAMAAJ&q=William+Belsham+libertarian&pg=PA11|page=11|access-date=26 October 2020|archive-date=11 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210411095920/https://books.google.com/books?id=Z6Y0AAAAMAAJ&q=William+Belsham+libertarian&pg=PA11|url-status=live}}</ref> As early as 1796, ''libertarian'' came to mean an advocate or defender of liberty, in the sense of a supporter of ], when the London Packet printed on 12 February the following: "Lately marched out of the Prison at Bristol, 450 of the French Libertarians".<ref>OED November 2010 edition</ref> It was again used in a republican sense in 1802 in a short piece critiquing a poem by "]" and has since been used politically.<ref>. p. 432. "The author's Latin verses, which are rather more intelligible than his English, mark him for a furious Libertarian (if we may coin such a term) and a zealous admirer of France, and her liberty, under Bonaparte; such liberty!"</ref><ref>] (1878). ''Life and Times of Stein: Or Germany and Prussia in the Napoleonic Age''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3: 355.</ref><ref>] (July 1901). "William Stubbs, Bishop of Oxford". '']''. 16: 419.</ref>


The use of the term ''libertarian'' to describe a new set of political positions has been traced to the French cognate ''libertaire'', coined in a letter French ] ] wrote to ] ] in 1857.<ref>Marshall, Peter (2009). ''Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism''. p. 641. "The word 'libertarian' has long been associated with anarchism, and has been used repeatedly throughout this work. The term originally denoted a person who upheld the doctrine of the freedom of the will; in this sense, Godwin was not a 'libertarian', but a 'necessitarian'. It came however to be applied to anyone who approved of liberty in general. In anarchist circles, it was first used by Joseph Déjacque as the title of his anarchist journal ''Le Libertaire, Journal du Mouvement Social'' published in New York in 1858. At the end of the last century, the anarchist Sebastien Faure took up the word, to stress the difference between anarchists and authoritarian socialists".</ref> Déjacque also used the term for his ] '']'' (''Libertarian: Journal of Social Movement'') which was printed from 9 June 1858 to 4 February 1861 in New York City.<ref>] (1962). ''Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements''. Meridian Books. p. 280. "He called himself a "social poet," and published two volumes of heavily didactic verse—Lazaréennes and Les Pyrénées Nivelées. In New York, from 1858 to 1861, he edited an anarchist paper entitled ''Le Libertaire, Journal du Mouvement Social'', in whose pages he printed as a serial his vision of the anarchist Utopia, entitled L'Humanisphére."</ref> ], another French libertarian communist, began publishing a new ''Le Libertaire'' in the mid-1890s while France's ] enacted the so-called villainous laws ('']'') which banned anarchist publications in France. ''Libertarianism'' has frequently been used to refer to ] and ].<ref name="Nettlau">{{cite book|title=A Short History of Anarchism|last=Nettlau|first=Max|author-link=Max Nettlau|year=1996|publisher=Freedom Press|isbn=978-0900384899|location=London|page=162|oclc=37529250}}</ref><ref name="Ward">Ward, Colin (2004). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160113191632/https://books.google.com/books?id=kksrWshoIkYC |date=13 January 2016 }}. Oxford: ]. p. 62. "For a century, anarchists have used the word 'libertarian' as a synonym for 'anarchist', both as a noun and an adjective. The celebrated anarchist journal ''Le Libertaire'' was founded in 1896. However, much more recently the word has been appropriated by various American free-market philosophers ."</ref><ref name="Chomsky 2002">{{cite web|last=Chomsky|first=Noam|title=The Week Online Interviews Chomsky|url=http://www.znetwork.org/zspace/commentaries/1137|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130113110804/http://www.znetwork.org/zspace/commentaries/1137|url-status=dead|archive-date=13 January 2013|work=Z Magazine|publisher=]|access-date=21 November 2011|author-link=Noam Chomsky|date=23 February 2002|quote=The term libertarian as used in the US means something quite different from what it meant historically and still means in the rest of the world. Historically, the libertarian movement has been the anti-statist wing of the socialist movement. Socialist anarchism was libertarian socialism.}}</ref>
Other libertarians such as ], ], and ] justified these rights on ] or ], as well as moral grounds. They argued that libertarianism was consistent with economic efficiency and, thus, the most effective means of promoting or enhancing social welfare.


In the United States, the term ''libertarian'' was popularized by the ] ] around the late 1870s and early 1880s.<ref>Comegna, Anthony; Gomez, Camillo (3 October 2018). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200803022437/https://www.libertarianism.org/columns/libertarianism-then-now |date=3 August 2020 }}. ''Libertarianism''. Cato Institute. " Benjamin Tucker was the first American to really start using the term 'libertarian' as a self-identifier somewhere in the late 1870s or early 1880s." Retrieved 3 August 2020.</ref> ''Libertarianism'' as a synonym for '']'' was popularized in May 1955 by writer Dean Russell, a colleague of ] and a ] himself. Russell justified the choice of the term as follows:
== Libertarian policy ==
{{blockquote|Many of us call ourselves "liberals." And it is true that the word "liberal" once described persons who respected the individual and feared the use of mass compulsions. But the leftists have now corrupted that once-proud term to identify themselves and their program of more government ownership of property and more controls over persons. As a result, those of us who believe in freedom must explain that when we call ourselves liberals, we mean liberals in the uncorrupted classical sense. At best, this is awkward and subject to misunderstanding. Here is a suggestion: Let those of us who love liberty trade-mark and reserve for our own use the good and honorable word "libertarian."<ref name="Russell">{{cite journal|last=Russell|first=Dean|date=May 1955|title=Who Is A Libertarian?|journal=The Freeman|volume=5|issue=5|publisher=Foundation for Economic Education|url=http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/who-is-a-libertarian/|access-date=6 March 2010|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100626222214/http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/who-is-a-libertarian/|archive-date=26 June 2010}}</ref><ref name="WhoIsALibertarian">Russel Dean (May 1955). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191128152056/https://fee.org/articles/who-is-a-libertarian/ |date=28 November 2019 }}. Foundation for Economic Education. Retrieved 28 November 2019.</ref><ref name="FEE">Tucker, Jeffrey (15 September 2016). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200223185333/https://fee.org/articles/where-does-the-term-libertarian-come-from-anyway/ |date=23 February 2020 }}. Foundation for Economic Education. Retrieved 28 November 2019.</ref>}}
] and ]'s ], consider the ] to be an important symbol of their ideas.]]
Libertarians strongly oppose infringement of civil rights such as restrictions on free expression (e.g., speech, press, or religious practice), prohibitions on voluntary association, or encroachments on persons or property except as a result of ] to establish or punish criminal behavior. As such, libertarians oppose any type of ] (even for offensive speech), restrictions on ] membership (as distinct from gang violence), or pre-trial forfeiture of property. Furthermore, most libertarians reject the distinction between political and commercial speech or association, a legal distinction often used to protect one type of activity and not the other from government intervention.


Subsequently, many Americans with classical liberal beliefs began to describe themselves as ''libertarians''. One person who popularized the term ''libertarian'' in this sense was ], who began publishing libertarian works in the 1960s.<ref>], ''The Invisible Hand in Popular Culture: Liberty Vs. Authority in American Film and TV'', University Press of Kentucky, 2012, p. 353, n. 2.</ref> Rothbard described this modern use of the words overtly as a "capture" from his enemies, writing that "for the first time in my memory, we, 'our side,' had captured a crucial word from the enemy. 'Libertarians' had long been simply a polite word for left-wing anarchists, that is for anti-private property anarchists, either of the communist or syndicalist variety. But now we had taken it over".<ref name="RothbardBetrayal"/>
Libertarians also frown on any laws restricting personal or ] behavior, as well as laws on ]s. As such, they believe that individual choices for products or services should not be limited by government licensing requirements or state-granted monopolies, or in the form of ]s that restrict choices for products and services from other nations. They also tend to oppose legal prohibitions on ], ], and ]. They believe that citizens should be free to take risks, even to the point of actual harm to themselves. For example, while most libertarians may personally agree with the majority who favor the use of ]s, libertarians reject ''mandating'' their use as ]. Similarly, many believe that the ] shouldn't ban unproven medical treatments, that any decisions on treatment be left between patient and doctor, and that government should, at most, be limited to passing non-binding judgments about efficacy or safety.


In the 1970s, ] was responsible for popularizing this usage of the term in academic and philosophical circles outside the United States,<ref name="Carlson"/><ref name="Lester"/><ref>Teles, Steven; Kenney, Daniel A. (2008). "Spreading the Word: The diffusion of American Conservatism in Europe and beyond". In Steinmo, Sven. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160113191632/https://books.google.com/books?id=Mfy3k0BWBNAC |date=13 January 2016 }} ''Growing Apart?: America and Europe in the Twenty-first Century]. ]. pp. 136–169.</ref> especially with the publication of '']'' (1974), a response to ] ]'s '']'' (1971).<ref> (1975). National Book Foundation. Retrieved 9 September 2011. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110909065656/http://www.nationalbook.org/nba1975.html|date=9 September 2011}}</ref> In the book, Nozick proposed a ] on the grounds that it was an inevitable phenomenon which could arise without violating ].<ref name="Schaefer">Schaefer, David Lewis (30 April 2008). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140821170556/http://www.nysun.com/sports/reconsiderations-robert-nozick-and-coast-utopia |date=21 August 2014 }}. ''The New York Sun''. Retrieved 26 June 2019.</ref>
Aside from their distaste of constraints on personal behavior, libertarians believe that government should refrain from imposing any ''positive'' moral obligations, such as religious practices, mandatory ], or tax-financed ]. In fact, most libertarians consider any forcible redistribution of wealth to be ], whether done by private individuals or through state power in the form of ]. As such, they generally oppose the tax-funded provision of ]s such as ], ], ], ], and ] (though such services may be funded privately). Many libertarians also object to redistributionist policies as economically inefficient, the product of inherently politicized decision making that leads to lower quality, highers costs and other distortions relative to what would be realized in a free market. They also oppose all collusion between government and corporations, often termed ] and ], which is seen as forcing individuals to subsidize unprofitable businesses through taxation.


According to common United States meanings of '']'' and '']'', ] has been described as ''conservative'' on economic issues (] and ]) and ''liberal'' on personal freedom (] and ]).<ref name="Libertarian Vote">Boaz, David; Kirby, David (18 October 2006). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031152256/https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/libertarian-vote |date=31 October 2019 }}. Cato Institute. Retrieved 10 February 2020.</ref> It is also often associated with a foreign policy of ].<ref name="pp. 177-180">{{cite encyclopedia|last1=Carpenter|first1=Ted Galen|last2=Innocent|first2=Malen|title=Foreign Policy |editor-first=Ronald|editor-last=Hamowy|editor-link=Ronald Hamowy|encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC&q=libertarianism+foreign+non-interventionism&pg=PT217|year=2008|publisher=]; ]|location=Thousand Oaks, CA|doi=10.4135/9781412965811.n109|isbn=978-1412965804|oclc=750831024|lccn=2008009151|pages=177–180|access-date=26 October 2020|archive-date=23 March 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220323173913/https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC&q=libertarianism+foreign+non-interventionism&pg=PT217|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="p. 182">Edward A. Olsen (2002). ''US National Defense for the Twenty-First Century: The Grand Exit Strategy''. ]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200501193500/https://books.google.com/books?id=-0ui1gpNE34C&pg=PA182&dq=libertarianism+foreign+non-interventionism&sa=X#v=onepage&q=libertarianism%20foreign%20non-interventionism |date=1 May 2020 }}. {{ISBN|978-0714681405}}.</ref>
Libertarians generally believe that such freedoms are a universal birthright, and they accept any material inequalities or wanton behavior, as long as it harms no one '''else''', likely to result from such a policy of governmental non-intervention. They see economic inequality as an outcome of people's freedom to choose their own actions, which may or may not be profitable.


=== Definitions ===
===Anarcho-capitalism and Minarchism===
]: the green quadrant represents ] and the purple ]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.politicalcompass.org/crowdchart2|title=The Political Compass|publisher=The Political Compass|date=11 October 2013|access-date=1 November 2013}}</ref>]]
] is a symbol of anarcho-capitalism. Some libertarians and Objectivists also use the ] as a symbol.]]
{{main articles|] and ]}} {{main|Definition of anarchism and libertarianism}}
Although libertarianism originated as a form of ] or ],<ref name="Carson"/><ref name="routledge-anarchism"/> the development in the mid-20th century of modern ] resulted in libertarianism's being commonly associated with ], as well as viewed by many as neither left- nor right-wing, but an independent pro-freedom and anti-authoritarian philosophy.<ref name="Block">Block, Walter (2010). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140513050938/http://mises.org/journals/jls/22_1/22_1_8.pdf |date=13 May 2014 }}. '']''. '''22'''. pp. 127–170.</ref> It also resulted in several authors and political scientists using two or more categorizations<ref name="Long1"/><ref name="Carlson1"/><ref name=":6" /> to distinguish libertarian views on the nature of property and capital, usually along left–right or socialist–capitalist lines.<ref name="Francis"/>


While all libertarians support some level of ], ] differ by supporting an ] ] of natural resources.<ref name=":6" /> Left-libertarian{{refn|<ref name="Kymlicka" /><ref name="Goodway" /><ref name="Marshall p. 641" /><ref name="Spitz" /><ref name="Newman" />}} ideologies include ], alongside many other anti-] and ] ] centered around ] as well as ], ], ] and the ].{{refn|<ref name="Kymlicka" /><ref name="Spitz" /><ref name="Routledge p. 227">"Anarchism". In Gaus, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred, eds. (2012). ''The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy''. p. 227. "The term 'left-libertarianism' has at least three meanings. In its oldest sense, it is a synonym either for anarchism in general or social anarchism in particular. Later it became a term for the left or Konkinite wing of the free-market libertarian movement, and has since come to cover a range of pro-market but anti-capitalist positions, mostly individualist anarchist, including agorism and mutualism, often with an implication of sympathies (such as for radical feminism or the labor movement) not usually shared by anarcho-capitalists. In a third sense it has recently come to be applied to a position combining individual self-ownership with an egalitarian approach to natural resources; most proponents of this position are not anarchists."</ref><ref name="Vallentyne" /><ref name="Carson">Carson, Kevin (15 June 2014). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190903175118/http://c4ss.org/content/28216 |date=3 September 2019 }}. Center for a Stateless Society. Retrieved 28 November 2019.</ref> }} Some variants of libertarianism, such as anarcho-capitalism, have been labeled as ] or ] by some scholars.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Goodwin |first=Barbara |title=Using Political Ideas |publisher=John Wiley and Sons, Inc. |year=2016 |isbn=978-1118708385 |location=Hoboken, NJ |page=151 |quote=Howewer, enough has been said to show that most anarchists have nothing in common with those libertarians of the far-right, the anarcho-capitalists }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=Liberalism: Old and New |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0521703055 |editor-last=Paul |editor-first=Ellen F. |volume=24 |page=199 |editor-last2=Miller |editor-first2=Fred D. |editor-last3=Paul |editor-first3=Jeffrey}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2012 |isbn=978-0195376692 |editor-last=Estlund |editor-first=David |page=162}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Hammer |first=Espen |title=Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences |publisher=SAGE Publications |year=2013 |isbn=978-1506332611 |editor-last=Kaldis |editor-first=Byron |volume=1 |pages=558–560 |chapter=Libertarianism, Political}}</ref>
Most who self-identify as libertarians are ]s, i.e., supportive of minimal taxation as a "necessary evil" for the limited purpose of funding public institutions that would protect civil liberties and property rights, including ], ], with no ], and judicial ]s. ], by contrast, oppose all ]ation, rejecting any government claim for a ] as unnecessary. They wish to keep the government out of matters of justice and protection, preferring to delegate these issues to private groups. Anarcho-capitalists argue that the minarchist belief that any ] can be contained within any reasonable limits is unrealistic, and that institutionalized coercion on any scale is counterproductive.


Those sometimes called "right-libertarians", usually by leftists or by other libertarians with more left-leaning ideologies, often reject the label due to its association with ] and right-wing politics and simply describe themselves as ''libertarians''. However, some, particularly those who describe themselves as ], agree with their placement on the political right. Meanwhile, some proponents of ] in the United States consciously label themselves as ''left-libertarians'' and see themselves as part of a broad libertarian left.<ref name="Carson"/><ref name="routledge-anarchism"/>
With the exception of some true ] and orthodox ]s, the policy positions of minarchists and anarcho-capitalists on mainstream issues tend to be indistinguishable as both sets of libertarians believe that existing governments are too intrusive. Some libertarian philosophers such as ] argue that, properly understood, minarchism and anarcho-capitalism are not in contradiction.


While the term ''libertarian'' had been substantially synonymous with ] and seen by many as part of the left,<ref name="Marshall">Marshall, Peter (2009). '']''. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930075247/https://books.google.com/books?id=QDWIOL_KtGYC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Demanding+the+Impossible%3A+A+History+of+Anarchism&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjjm-Sm78nmAhUODewKHUY_D7UQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=For%20a%20long%20time%2C%20libertarian%20was%20interchangable%20in%20France%20with%20anarchism%20but%20in%20recent%20years%2C%20its%20meaning%20has%20become%20more%20ambivalente.%20Some%20anarchists%20like%20Daniel%20Gu%C3%A9rin%20will%20call%20themselves%20'libertarian%20socialists'%2C%20partly%20to%20avoid%20the%20negative%20overtones%20still%20associated%20with%20anarchism%2C%20and%20partly%20to%20stress%20the%20place%20of%20anarchism%20within%20the%20socialist%20tradition.%20Even%20Marxists%20of%20the%20New%20Left%20like%20E.%20P.%20Thompson%20call%20themselves%20'libertarian'%20to%20distinguish%20themselves%20from%20those%20authoritarian%20socialists%20and%20communists%20who%20believe%20in%20revolutionary%20dictatorship%20and%20vanguard%20parties.&f=false |date=30 September 2020 }}. "For a long time, libertarian was interchangeable in France with anarchism but in recent years, its meaning has become more ambivalent. Some anarchists like Daniel Guérin will call themselves 'libertarian socialists', partly to avoid the negative overtones still associated with anarchism, and partly to stress the place of anarchism within the socialist tradition. Even Marxists of the New Left like E. P. Thompson call themselves 'libertarian' to distinguish themselves from those authoritarian socialists and communists who believe in revolutionary dictatorship and vanguard parties."</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Cohn|first=Jesse|editor-last1=Ness|editor-first1=Immanuel|chapter=Anarchism|title=The International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest|url=https://archive.org/details/internationalenc00ness|url-access=limited|date=April 20, 2009|location=Oxford|publisher=John Wiley & Sons, Ltd|page=|quote='ibertarianism' a term that, until the mid-twentieth century, was synonymous with "anarchism" per se.|doi=10.1002/9781405198073.wbierp0039|isbn=978-1405198073}}</ref> continuing today as part of the libertarian left in opposition to the moderate left such as ] or ] and ] socialism, its meaning has evolved during the past half century, with broader adoption by ideologically disparate groups,<ref name="Marshall"/> including some viewed as right-wing by older users of the term.<ref name="Goodway"/><ref name="Marshall p. 565"/> As a term, ''libertarian'' can include both the ] Marxists (who do not associate with a ]) and extreme liberals (primarily concerned with ]) or ]. Additionally, some libertarians use the term '']'' to avoid anarchism's negative connotations and emphasize its connections with socialism.<ref name="Marshall"/><ref name="Guérin">Guérin, Daniel (1970). '']''. New York City: Monthly Review Press. p. 12. "narchism is really a synonym for socialism. The anarchist is primarily a socialist whose aim is to abolish the exploitation of man by man. Anarchism is only one of the streams of socialist thought, that stream whose main components are concern for liberty and haste to abolish the State." {{ISBN|978-0853451754}}.</ref>
==History==
{{main articles|] and ]}}


The revival of free-market ideologies during the mid-to-late 20th century came with disagreement over what to call the movement. While many believers in economic freedom prefer the term ''libertarian'', some free-market ]s reject the term's association with the 1960s New Left and its connotations of ] hedonism.<ref name="Gamble 2013 p. 405">{{cite journal|last=Gamble|first=Andrew|author-link=Andrew Gamble|editor-last1=Freeden|editor-first1=Michael|editor-last2=Stears|editor-first2=Marc|title=Economic Libertarianism|journal=The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies|date=August 2013|publisher=Oxford University Press|page=405|doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0008}}</ref> The movement is divided over the use of ''conservatism'' as an alternative.<ref name="Gamble 2013 p. 406">{{cite journal|last=Gamble|first=Andrew|author-link=Andrew Gamble|editor-last1=Freeden|editor-first1=Michael|editor-last2=Stears|editor-first2=Marc|title=Economic Libertarianism|journal=The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies|date=August 2013|publisher=Oxford University Press|page=406|doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0008}}</ref> Those who seek both economic and social liberty would be known as ''liberals'', but that term developed associations opposite of the ], low-taxation, minimal state advocated by the movement.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Gamble|first=Andrew|author-link=Andrew Gamble|editor-last1=Freeden|editor-first1=Michael|editor-last2=Stears|editor-first2=Marc|title=Economic Libertarianism|journal=The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies|date=August 2013|publisher=Oxford University Press|pages=405–406|doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0008}}</ref> Name variants of the free-market revival movement include '']'', '']'', '']'' and '']''.<ref name="Gamble 2013 p. 405"/> As a term, ''libertarian'' or ''economic libertarian'' has the most everyday acceptance to describe a member of the movement, with the latter term being based on both the ideology's importance of economics and its distinction from libertarians of the New Left.<ref name="Gamble 2013 p. 406"/>
Confusingly, it was anarchist communist ] who first coined the term libertarian in 1857 . While many left-anarchists still use the term, its most common usage in the United States has nothing to do with socialism.
]
While both historical and contemporary libertarianism share general antipathy towards power by government authority, the latter exempts power wielded through ]. Historically, libertarians, including ] and ], supported the protection of an individual's freedom from powers of government and private ownership.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Francis|first1=Mark|title=Human Rights and Libertarians|journal=]|volume=29|issue=3|page=462|date=December 1983|doi=10.1111/j.1467-8497.1983.tb00212.x|issn=0004-9522}}</ref> In contrast, while condemning governmental encroachment on personal liberties, modern American libertarians support freedoms based on their agreement with private property rights.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Francis|first1=Mark|title=Human Rights and Libertarians|journal=]|volume=29|issue=3|pages=462–463|date=December 1983|doi=10.1111/j.1467-8497.1983.tb00212.x|issn=0004-9522}}</ref> The abolition or privatization of amenities or entitlements controlled by the government is a common theme in modern American libertarian writings.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Francis|first1=Mark|title=Human Rights and Libertarians|journal=]|volume=29|issue=3|page=463|date=December 1983|doi=10.1111/j.1467-8497.1983.tb00212.x|issn=0004-9522}}</ref>


According to modern American libertarian ], left-libertarians and right-libertarians agree with certain libertarian premises, but "where differ is in terms of the logical implications of these founding axioms".<ref name="Block" /> Although several modern American libertarians reject the ], especially the ],<ref name="Rothbard">Rothbard, Murray (1 March 1971). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201101091933/https://mises.org/library/left-and-right-within-libertarianism |date=1 November 2020 }}. ''WIN: Peace and Freedom Through Nonviolent Action''. '''7''' (4): 6–10. Retrieved 14 January 2020.</ref><ref name="Read">Read, Leonard E. (January 1956). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718043628/http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/neither-left-nor-right#axzz2Vgjo32JJ |date=18 July 2014 }}. '']''. '''48''' (2): 71–73.</ref><ref name="Browne">Browne, Harry (21 December 1998). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101006055112/http://www.harrybrowne.org/articles/Abortion.htm |date=6 October 2010 }}. HarryBrowne.org. Retrieved 14 January 2020.</ref><ref name="Raimondo">Raimondo, Justin (2000). ''An Enemy of the State''. Chapter 4: "Beyond left and right". ]. p. 159.</ref><ref name="Machan">Machan, Tibor R. (2004). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110101182255/http://www.hoover.org/publications/books/8300 |date=1 January 2011 }}. '''522'''. ]. {{ISBN|978-0817939823}}.</ref> several strands of libertarianism in the United States and right-libertarianism have been described as being right-wing,<ref name="Robin">{{cite book|title=The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin|last=Robin|first=Corey|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2011|isbn=978-0199793747|pages=|url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780199793747/page/15}}</ref> ]<ref>{{cite journal|title=Right-Libertarian Parties and the "New Values": A Re-examination|last1=Harmel|first1=Robert|last2=Gibson|first2=Rachel K.|journal=Scandinavian Political Studies|date=June 1995|volume=18|issue=July 1993|pages=97–118|doi=10.1111/j.1467-9477.1995.tb00157.x |issn=0080-6757 }}</ref><ref>Robinson, Emily; ''et al.'' (2017). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200803093146/https://academic.oup.com/tcbh/article/28/2/268/3061496 |date=3 August 2020 }}. ''Twentieth Century British History''. '''28''' (2): 268–304.</ref> or ]<ref>Kitschelt, Herbert; McGann, Anthony J. (1997) . '']''. University of Michigan Press. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200805010036/https://books.google.com/books?id=AZiD0rsmqO4C&pg=PA27&dq=%22right-libertarianism%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=p5rcUPreFaXv0gGnvICACA&ved=0CDwQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22right-libertarianism%22&f=false |date=5 August 2020 }}. {{ISBN|978-0472084418}}.</ref><ref>Mudde, Cas (11 October 2016). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200804162515/https://books.google.com/books?id=3PgwDQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=The+Populist+Radical+Right:+A+Reader&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj60OqKmYHnAhVQDOwKHelHBMIQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=Right-libertarianism&f=false |date=4 August 2020 }} (1st ed.). Routledge. {{ISBN|978-1138673861}}.</ref> and ].<ref name="Baradat">{{cite book|title=Political Ideologies|last=Baradat|first=Leon P.|publisher=Routledge|year=2015|page=31|isbn=978-1317345558}}</ref> While some American libertarians such as ],<ref name="Block"/> ],<ref name="Browne"/> ],<ref name="Machan"/> ],<ref name="Raimondo"/> ]<ref name="Read"/> and ]<ref name="Rothbard"/> deny any association with either the left or right, other American libertarians such as ],<ref name="Carson"/> ],<ref>Hess, Karl (18 February 2015). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317182806/https://c4ss.org/content/35952 |date=17 March 2020 }}. Center for a Stateless Society. Tulsa Alliance of the Libertarian Left. Retrieved 17 March 2020. "The far left, as far as you can get away from the right, would logically represent the opposite tendency and, in fact, has done just that throughout history. The left has been the side of politics and economics that opposes the concentration of power and wealth and, instead, advocates and works toward the distribution of power into the maximum number of hands."</ref> and Roderick T. Long<ref>Long, Roderick T. (8 April 2006). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191010073127/https://mises.org/library/rothbards-left-and-right-forty-years-later |date=10 October 2019 }}. Mises Institute. Rothbard Memorial Lecture, Austrian Scholars Conference 2006. Retrieved 17 March 2020.</ref> have written about libertarianism's left-wing opposition to authoritarian rule and argued that libertarianism is fundamentally a left-wing position. Rothbard himself previously made the same point.<ref>Rothbard, Murray (Spring 1965). "Left and Right: The Prospects for Liberty". ''Left and Right: A Journal of Libertarian Thought''. '''1''' (1): 4–22.</ref>
Instead, libertarianism as a political ideal is viewed as a form of ], a modern term often used interchangeably with libertarianism. This concept, originally referred to simply as "liberalism," arose from ] ideas in Europe and America, including the political philosophies of ] and the ], and the moral and economic philosophy of ]. By the late 18th Century, these ideas quickly spread with the ] throughout the ].


The '']'' defines libertarianism as the ] view that agents initially fully own themselves and have certain moral powers to acquire property rights in external things.<ref name=":6">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Libertarianism |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, CSLI, Stanford University |url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/libertarianism/ |access-date=November 20, 2011 |author=Peter Vallentyne}}</ref> Libertarian historian ] defines libertarianism as the philosophy that fundamentally doubts authority and advocates transforming society by reform or revolution.<ref>George Woodcock. ''Anarchism: A History of Llibertarian Ideas and Movements''. Petersborough, Ontario: Broadview Press. pp. 11–31, especially p. 18. {{ISBN|1551116294}}.</ref> Libertarian philosopher Roderick T. Long defines libertarianism as "any political position that advocates a radical redistribution of power from the coercive state to voluntary associations of free individuals", whether "voluntary association" takes the form of the free market or of communal co-operatives.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Roderick T. Long |author-link=Roderick T. Long |year=1998 |title=Towards a Libertarian Theory of Class |url=http://www.praxeology.net/libclass-theory-part-1.pdf |journal=Social Philosophy and Policy |volume=15 |issue=2 |pages=303–349, at p. 304 |doi=10.1017/S0265052500002028|s2cid=145150666 }}</ref> According to the ], of the United States, libertarianism is the advocacy of either anarchy, or government that is funded voluntarily and limited to protecting individuals from coercion and violence.<ref>Duncan Watts (2002). ''Understanding American Government and Politics: A Guide for A2 Politics Students''. Manchester, England. Manchester University Press. p. 246.</ref>
Locke developed a version of the ] as rule with "the ]" derived from ]. The role of the legislature was to protect natural rights in the legal form of ]s. Locke built on the idea of natural rights to propose a labor theory of property; each individual in the ] "owns" himself and, by virtue of their ], owns the fruits of his efforts. From this conception of natural rights, an economy emerges based on ] and ], with ] as the medium of exchange.


=== Philosophy ===
At around the same period, the French philosopher Montesquieu developed a distinction between sovereign and administrative powers, and proposed a ] among the latter as a counterweight to the natural tendency of administrative power to grow at the expense of individual rights. He allowed as to how this separation of powers could work just as well in a ] as for a limited monarchy, though he personally preferred the latter. Nevertheless, his ideas fed the imaginations of America's ], and would become the basis upon which political power would be exercised by most governments, both constitutional monarchies and republics, beginning with the United States.
According to the '']'' (IEP), "What it means to be a 'libertarian' in a political sense is a contentious issue, especially among libertarians themselves."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Zwolinski |first=Matt |title=Libertarianism {{!}} Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |url=https://iep.utm.edu/libertar/ |access-date=2022-11-01 |website=] |language=en-US}}</ref> Nevertheless, all libertarians begin with a conception of ] from which they argue in favor of civil liberties and a reduction or elimination of the state.<ref name="Boaz"/> People described as being left-libertarian or right-libertarian generally tend to call themselves simply libertarians and refer to their philosophy as libertarianism. As a result, some political scientists and writers classify the forms of libertarianism into two or more groups<ref name="Long1"/><ref name="Carlson1"/> to distinguish libertarian views on the nature of ] and ].<ref name="Francis"/><ref name="Carlson p. 1006"/> In the United States, proponents of ] anti-capitalism consciously label themselves as left-libertarians and see themselves as being part of a broad libertarian left.<ref name="Carson"/><ref name="routledge-anarchism">"Anarchism". In Gaus, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred, eds. (2012). ''The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy''. p. 227.</ref>


Libertarianism is a "heory upholding... rights...above all else" and seeks to "reduce" the power of a state or states, especially ones a libertarian lives in or is closely associated with, to "safeguard" and maintain individualism.<ref name=":212">{{Cite book |last1=Black |first1=Jeremy |title=World History |last2=Brewer |first2=Paul |last3=Shaw |first3=Anthony |last4=Chandler |first4=Malcolm |last5=Cheshire |first5=Gerard |last6=Cranfield |first6=Ingrid |last7=Ralph Lewis |first7=Brenda |last8=Sutherland |first8=Joe |last9=Vint |first9=Robert |publisher=Parragon Books |year=2003 |isbn=0-75258-227-5 |location=] |pages=342 |author-link=Jeremy Black (historian)}}</ref>
Adam Smith's moral philosophy stressed government non-intervention so that individuals could achieve whatever their "God-given talents" would allow without interference from arbitrary forces. His economic analysis suggested that anything interfering with the ability of individuals to contribute their best talents to any enterprise--a reference to ] policies and ] ]--would lead to an inefficient division of labor, and hamstring progress generally. Smith stated that "a voluntary, informed transaction always benefits both parties," such that "voluntary" and "informed" meant the absence of force or fraud.


Libertarians argue that some forms of order within society ] from the actions of many different individuals acting independently from one another without any ].<ref name="Boaz" /> Proposed examples of systems that evolved through spontaneous order or self-organization include the ], ], ], the ], ], ], ], and a ] ].<ref name="Barry1982">{{cite journal |last=Barry |first=Norman |author-link=Norman P. Barry |year=1982 |title=The Tradition of Spontaneous Order |journal=Literature of Liberty |volume=5 |issue=2}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=April 15, 2009 |title=Misplaced Pages's Model Follows Hayek |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123976347774119699 |newspaper=]}}</ref>
During the ], the ] enshrined the protection of liberty as the primary purpose of government. ] said that "rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others." He is also credited with the saying that "the government that governs best, governs least."


==== Libertarianism ====
The Marquis de La Fayette imported American ideas of liberty, although some might say ''re-imported'', in drafting the French Declaration of the Rights of Man of 1789, which states:
Based on the works of European writers like ], ], ] and ], it developed in the United States in the mid-20th century, and is now the most popular conception of libertarianism.<ref name="Carlson"/><ref name="Lester">Lester, J. C. (22 October 2017). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180706161710/https://philpapers.org/rec/INDNLA |date=6 July 2018 }}. PhilPapers. Retrieved 26 June 2019.</ref> Commonly referred to as a continuation or radicalization of ],<ref>Boaz, David (1998). ''Libertarianism: A Primer''. Free Press. pp. 22–26.</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia|last=Conway|first=David|author-link=David Conway (academic)|editor-first=Ronald|editor-last=Hamowy|editor-link=Ronald Hamowy|encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism|title=Liberalism, Classical|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC|year=2008|publisher=]; ]|location=Thousand Oaks, California|doi=10.4135/9781412965811.n112|isbn=978-1412965804|oclc=750831024|lccn=2008009151|pages=295–298|quote=Depending on the context, libertarianism can be seen as either the contemporary name for classical liberalism, adopted to avoid confusion in those countries where liberalism is widely understood to denote advocacy of expansive government powers, or as a more radical version of classical liberalism.|chapter=Freedom of Speech|access-date=31 October 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930070314/https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC|url-status=live}}</ref> the most important of these early philosophers and economists was ].<ref name="Carlson"/><ref name="Lester"/><ref name="Schaefer"/>
:''Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights.''


While left-libertarians advocate for social freedom, right-libertarians also value social ]s that support capitalist conditions. They reject institutions that oppose this framework, arguing that such interventions unnecessarily coerce individuals and violate their economic freedom.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180508082636/https://www.lp.org/about/ |date=8 May 2018 }}. Libertarian Party. "Libertarians strongly oppose any government interference into their personal, family, and business decisions. Essentially, we believe all Americans should be free to live their lives and pursue their interests as they see fit as long as they do no harm to another". Retrieved 2 May 2020.</ref> ]s<ref name="Newman"/><ref name="Marshall p. 565"/> seek the elimination of the state in favor of privately funded security services while minarchists defend ]s which maintain only those functions of government necessary to safeguard natural rights, understood in terms of self-ownership or autonomy.<ref name=":3">{{cite book|last1=Nozick|first1=Robert|title=Anarchy, State, and Utopia|date=1974|publisher=Basic Books}}</ref>
], in a reformulation of ]'s notion of ], stated that, "Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign." Mill contrasts this with what he calls the "tyranny of the majority," declaring that utilitarianism requires that political arrangements satisfy the "]", whereby each person would be guaranteed the greatest possible liberty that would not interfere with the liberty of others, so that each person may maximize his or her happiness. This ideal would be echoed later by English philosopher ] when he espoused the "law of equal liberty," stating that "every man has freedom to do all that he wills, provided he infringes not the equal freedom of any other man."


==== Left-libertarianism ====
] advocated an ] version of social contract which was not between individuals and the state, but rather "an agreement of man with man; an agreement from which must result what we call society". One of his famous statements is that "anarchy is order." In his formulation of ], he asserted that labor is the only legitimate form of property, stating "property is freedom", rejecting both private and collective ownership of property "]". However, he later abandoned his rejection of property, and endorsed private property "as a counterweight to the power of the State, and by so doing to insure the liberty of the individual."
]<ref name="Goodway">Goodway, David (2006). '']''. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308005207/https://books.google.com/books?id=Fgya85u7S-4C&pg=PA4&dq=anarcho-capitalism+right+libertarian&sa=X&ct=result&resnum=10#v=onepage&q=anarcho-capitalism%20right%20libertarian |date=8 March 2021 }}. {{ISBN|978-1846310256}}. "'Libertarian' and 'libertarianism' are frequently employed by anarchists as synonyms for 'anarchist' and 'anarchism', largely as an attempt to distance themselves from the negative connotations of 'anarchy' and its derivatives. The situation has been vastly complicated in recent decades with the rise of anarcho-capitalism, 'minimal statism' and an extreme right-wing ''laissez-faire'' philosophy advocated by such theorists as Murray Rothbard and Robert Nozick and their adoption of the words 'libertarian' and 'libertarianism'. It has therefore now become necessary to distinguish between their right libertarianism and the left libertarianism of the anarchist tradition".</ref><ref name="Marshall p. 641">Marshall, Peter (2008). '']''. London: Harper Perennial. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210307210848/https://books.google.it/books?id=QDWIOL_KtGYC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Demanding+the+Impossible:+A+History+of+Anarchism&hl=it&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiIt4Gi0eLlAhXP_qQKHRvYD10Q6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=Left%20libertarianism&f=false |date=7 March 2021 }}. "Left libertarianism can therefore range from the decentralist who wishes to limit and devolve State power, to the syndicalist who wants to abolish it altogether. It can even encompass the Fabians and the social democrats who wish to socialize the economy but who still see a limited role for the State".</ref><ref name="Newman">Newman, Saul (2010). ''The Politics of Postanarchism'', Edinburgh University Press. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930075316/https://books.google.com/books?id=SiqBiViUsOkC&pg=PA43&dq=anarcho-capitalism+right+libertarian&sa=X&ct=result&resnum=3#v=onepage&q=anarcho-capitalism%20right%20libertarian |date=30 September 2020 }}. {{ISBN|978-0748634958}}. "It is important to distinguish between anarchism and certain strands of right-wing libertarianism which at times go by the same name (for example, Murray Rothbard's anarcho-capitalism). There is a complex debate within this tradition between those like Robert Nozick, who advocate a 'minimal state', and those like Rothbard who want to do away with the state altogether and allow all transactions to be governed by the market alone. From an anarchist perspective, however, both positions—the minimal state (minarchist) and the no-state ('anarchist') positions—neglect the problem of economic domination; in other words, they neglect the hierarchies, oppressions, and forms of exploitation that would inevitably arise in a ''laissez-faire'' 'free' market. Anarchism, therefore, has no truck with this right-wing libertarianism, not only because it neglects economic inequality and domination, but also because in practice (and theory) it is highly inconsistent and contradictory. The individual freedom invoked by right-wing libertarians is only a narrow economic freedom within the constraints of a capitalist market, which, as anarchists show, is no freedom at all".</ref> encompasses those libertarian beliefs that claim the Earth's natural resources belong to everyone in an egalitarian manner, either unowned or owned collectively.<ref name="Kymlicka">] (2005). "libertarianism, left-". In ]. ''The Oxford Companion to Philosophy''. New York City: ]. p. 516. {{ISBN|978-0199264797}}. "'Left-libertarianism' is a new term for an old conception of justice, dating back to Grotius. It combines the libertarian assumption that each person possesses a natural right of self-ownership over his person with the egalitarian premiss that natural resources should be shared equally. Right-wing libertarians argue that the right of self-ownership entails the right to appropriate unequal parts of the external world, such as unequal amounts of land. According to left-libertarians, however, the world's natural resources were initially unowned, or belonged equally to all, and it is illegitimate for anyone to claim exclusive private ownership of these resources to the detriment of others. Such private appropriation is legitimate only if everyone can appropriate an equal amount, or if those who appropriate more are taxed to compensate those who are thereby excluded from what was once common property. Historic proponents of this view include Thomas Paine, Herbert Spencer, and Henry George. Recent exponents include Philippe Van Parijs and Hillel Steiner."</ref><ref name="Spitz">{{cite journal|url=https://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_RAI_023_0023--left-wing-libertarianism-equality-based.htm|title=Left-wing libertarianism: equality based on self-ownership|last=Spitz|first=Jean-Fabien|journal=Raisons Politiques|date=March 2006|volume=23 |issue=3 |pages=23–46 |doi=10.3917/rai.023.0023 |access-date=11 March 2018|archive-date=23 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190323204656/https://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_RAI_023_0023--left-wing-libertarianism-equality-based.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Routledge p. 227"/><ref name="Vallentyne"/><ref name="Carlson"/> Contemporary left-libertarians such as ], ], ], ] and ] believe the appropriation of land must leave "]" for others or be taxed by society to compensate for the exclusionary effects of private property.<ref name="Kymlicka"/><ref name="Vallentyne">{{cite encyclopedia|title=Libertarianism|encyclopedia=]|publisher=]|location=Stanford, California|url=http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/libertarianism/|access-date=5 March 2010|last=Vallentyne|first=Peter|date=March 2009|edition=Spring 2009|quote=Libertarianism is committed to full self-ownership. A distinction can be made, however, between right-libertarianism and left-libertarianism, depending on the stance taken on how natural resources can be owned.|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|archive-date=6 July 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190706070638/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/libertarianism/|url-status=live}}</ref> ]s<ref name="Kropotkin"/><ref name="Otero"/><ref name="Chomsky 2003"/><ref name="Carlson p. 1006"/> such as ] and ]s, ]s, ]s, ]s and ]s promote ] and ] economic theories, including ], ], ] and ].<ref name="Routledge p. 227"/><ref name="Carson"/> They criticize the state for being the defender of private property and believe capitalism entails ] and another form of coercion and domination related to that of the state.<ref name="Kropotkin"/><ref name="Otero"/><ref name="Chomsky 2003"/>


There are a number of different left-libertarian positions on the state, which can range from advocating for its ] to advocating for a more ] and ] with ] of the economy.<ref name="Marshall 2009 p. 641">Marshall, Peter (2009) . '']'' (POLS ed.). Oakland, California: PM Press. p. 641. "Left libertarianism can therefore range from the decentralist who wishes to limit and devolve State power, to the syndicalist who wants to abolish it altogether. It can even encompass the Fabians and the social democrats who wish to socialize the economy but who still see a limited role for the State." {{ISBN|978-1604860641}}.</ref> According to Sheldon Richman of the ], other left-libertarians "prefer that corporate privileges be repealed before the regulatory restrictions on how those privileges may be exercised".<ref name="LibertarianLeft2">{{Cite web |last=Richman |first=Sheldon |date=2011-02-03 |title=Libertarian Left |url=https://www.theamericanconservative.com/libertarian-left/ |access-date=2023-01-01 |website=The American Conservative |language=en-US}}</ref>
By the early 20th Century, mainstream thought in many parts of the world began to diverge from an almost exclusive focus on negative liberty and free markets to a more positive assertion of rights promoted by the ] in the United States and the ] movement in Europe. Rather than government existing merely to "secure the rights" of free people, many began to agitate for the use of government power to promote positive rights. This change is exemplified by ]'s ], two of which are negative, namely restricting governments from infringing "freedom of speech" and "freedom of worship," and two of which were positive, declaring a "freedom from want", i.e., government delivery of domestic and foreign aid, and a "freedom from fear", i.e., an internationalist policy for imposing peace between nations.


==== Other variants ====
As "liberal" came to be identified with Progressive policies in several English-speaking countries during the 1920s and 1930s, many of those who espoused the original, minimal-state philosophy began to distinguish their doctrine by calling themselves "classical liberals."


]<ref name=":4">Thaler, Richard; Sunstein, Cass (2003). "Libertarian Paternalism". ''The American Economic Review''. 93: 175–179.</ref> is a position advocated in the international bestseller ''Nudge'' by two American scholars, namely the economist ] and the jurist ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness|url=https://archive.org/details/nudgeim_tha_2008_00_2497|url-access=registration|last=Thaler|first=Richard H.|date=2008|publisher=Yale University Press|others=Sunstein, Cass R.|isbn=978-0300122237|location=New Haven, CT|oclc=181517463}}</ref> In the book ''Thinking, Fast and Slow'', ] provides the brief summary: "Thaler and Sunstein advocate a position of libertarian paternalism, in which the state and other institutions are allowed to ''nudge'' people to make decisions that serve their own long-term interests. The designation of joining a pension plan as the default option is an example of a nudge. It is difficult to argue that anyone's freedom is diminished by being automatically enrolled in the plan, when they merely have to check a box to opt out."<ref name="Kahneman">{{cite book|title=Thinking, Fast and Slow|url=https://archive.org/details/thinkingfastslow0000kahn|url-access=registration|last=Kahneman|first=Daniel|isbn=978-0374275631|edition=1st|location=New York City, NY|oclc=706020998|date=25 October 2011}}</ref> ''Nudge'' is considered an important piece of literature in ].<ref name="Kahneman"/>
In the early 20th Century, the rise of ] in Germany and ] in Russia were generally seen as distinct movements, with the latter bearing more resemblance to the Progressive movement in the West, and gaining much sympathy from many of its advocates. A group of central European economists called the ] challenged that distinction between various brands of ] by identifying the common ] underpinning to their doctrines, and claiming that collectivism in all its forms is inherently antithetical to liberty as traditionally understood in the West. These thinkers included ], ], and ], the latter describing the "] as the linchpin" of libertarianism. The Austrian School had a powerful impact on both economic teaching and libertarian principles. In the latter half of the 20th century, the term "libertarian," which had earlier been associated with anarchism, came to be adopted by those whose attitudes bore closer resemblance to "classical liberals."


] combines "the libertarian's moral commitment to ] with a procedure that selects principles for restricting liberty on the basis of a unanimous agreement in which everyone's particular interests receive a fair hearing".<ref name=":5">Sterba, James (2013). ''The Pursuit of Justice''. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 66. {{ISBN|978-1442221796}}.</ref> Neo-libertarianism has its roots at least as far back as 1980 when it was first described by the American philosopher James Sterba of the ]. Sterba observed that libertarianism advocates for a government that does no more than protection against force, fraud, theft, enforcement of contracts and other so-called ] as contrasted with ] by ].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|last=Carter|first=Ian|date=2 August 2016|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberty-positive-negative/|title=Positive and Negative Liberty|encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|access-date=21 September 2020|archive-date=16 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191116230338/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberty-positive-negative/|url-status=live}}</ref> Sterba contrasted this with the older libertarian ideal of a night watchman state or minarchism. Sterba held that it is "obviously impossible for everyone in society to be guaranteed complete liberty as defined by this ideal: after all, people's actual wants as well as their conceivable wants can come into serious conflict. t is also impossible for everyone in society to be completely free from the interference of other persons."<ref>Sterba, James (1980). ''Justice: Alternative Political Perspectives''. Boston: Wadsworth Publishing Company. p. 175. {{ISBN|978-0534007621}}.</ref> In 2013, Sterba wrote, "I shall show that moral commitment to an ideal of 'negative' liberty, which does not lead to a night-watchman state, but instead requires sufficient government to provide each person in society with the relatively high minimum of liberty that persons using ]' ] would select. The political program actually justified by an ideal of negative liberty I shall call ''Neo-Libertarianism''."<ref>Sterba, James (2013). ''The Pursuit of Justice''. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 52. {{ISBN|978-1442221796}}.</ref>
===Libertarian philosophy in the academy===
Seminars in libertarianism were being taught in the U.S. starting in the 1960's, including a personal studies seminar at SUNY Geneseo starting in 1972. Philosophical libertarianism gained a significant measure of acceptance in the academy with the publication of Harvard professor ]'s ''Anarchy, State, and Utopia'' in 1974. Left-liberal philosopher ] famously argued that Nozick's libertarianism was 'without foundations' because Nozick's libertarianism proceeded from the assumption that individuals owned themselves without any further explanation.


Libertarian populism combines libertarian and populist politics. According to ], writing in the libertarian magazine '']'', libertarian populists oppose "big government" while also opposing "other large, centralized institutions" and advocate "tak an axe to the thicket of corporate subsidies, favors, and bailouts, clearing our way to an economy where businesses that can't make money serving customers don't have the option of wringing profits from the taxpayers instead".<ref name=":7">{{Cite web |last=Walker |first=Jesse |date=2013-07-23 |title=Three Lessons for Libertarian Populists |url=https://reason.com/2013/07/23/three-lessons-for-libertarian-populists/ |access-date=2022-09-25 |website=] |language=en-US}}</ref>
] aimed to meet this challenge. Based on the work of ], Narveson developed contractarian libertarianism, outlined in his 1988 work ''The Libertarian Idea'', and then extended in his 2002 work ''Respecting Persons in Theory and Practice''. In these works, Narveson agreed with Hobbes that individuals would lay down their ability to kill and steal from each other in order to leave the state of nature, but he broke with Hobbes in arguing that an absolute state was not necessary to enforce this agreement. Narveson argues that no state at all is required. Other advocates of contractarian libertarianism include the founder of the public choice school of economics and Nobel Laureate ], and Hungarian-French philosopher ].


===Left-libertarians=== ==== Typology ====
], created by American libertarian ], expands the left–right line into a two-dimensional chart classifying the political spectrum by degrees of personal and economic freedom]]
There is also a camp of libertarians in Anglo-American Political Philosophy who hold egalitarian principles with the ideas of individual freedom and property rights. They call themselves "left-libertarians". ]s believe that the initial distribution of property is naturally egalitarian in nature, such that either persons cannot legally appropriate property privately and exclusively or they must obtain permission of all within the political community to do so. Some left-libertarians even use the ] in such a way as to promote redistributive types of justice in ways seemingly compatible with libertarian rights of self-ownership. Some left-libertarians in modern times include ], ], ], and ], whose book ''Libertarianism Without Inequality'' is one of the most egalitarian leaning libertarian texts currently in publication.
], and increasingly worldwide, ''libertarian'' is a typology used to describe a political position that advocates ] and is ] and ] in a two-dimensional political spectrum such as the libertarian-inspired ], where the other major typologies are '']'', '']'' and '']''.<ref name="Libertarian Vote"/><ref name="Anes 2004">Arbor, Ann. ''The ANES Guide to Public Opinion and Electoral Behavior, 1948–2004''. American National Election Studies.</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190818013938/https://www.nolanchart.com/faq/faq8-php |date=18 August 2019 }}. Nolan Chart. Retrieved 10 February 2020.</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200331115109/https://www.theadvocates.org/about-the-quiz/ |date=31 March 2020 }}. Advocates for Self-Government. Retrieved 8 February 2020.</ref> ''Libertarians'' support the legalization of victimless crimes such as the use of marijuana while opposing high levels of taxation and government spending on health, welfare, and education.<ref name="Libertarian Vote"/> ''Libertarians'' also support a foreign policy of ]''.<ref name="pp. 177-1802">{{cite encyclopedia |year=2008 |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism |publisher=SAGE Publications; Cato Institute |location=Thousand Oaks, California |editor-last=Hamowy |editor-first=Ronald |editor-link=Ronald Hamowy |pages=177–180 |doi=10.4135/9781412965811.n109 |isbn=978-1-4129-6580-4 |lccn=2008009151 |oclc=750831024 |last2=Innocent |first2=Malen |last1=Carpenter |first1=Ted Galen |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC&q=libertarianism+foreign+non-interventionism&pg=PT217 |chapter=Foreign Policy}}</ref><ref name="p. 1822">Olsen, Edward A. (2002). ''US National Defense for the Twenty-First Century: The Grand Exit Strategy''. ]. . {{ISBN|0714681407}}. {{ISBN|9780714681405}}.</ref>'' ''Libertarian'' was adopted in the United States, where ''liberal'' had become associated with a version that supports extensive government spending on social policies.<ref name="FEE"/> ''Libertarian'' may also refer to an ] ideology that developed in the 19th century and to a liberal version that developed in the United States that is avowedly pro-].<ref name="Kymlicka"/><ref name="Goodway"/><ref name="Newman"/>


According to polls, approximately one in four Americans self-identify as ''libertarian''.<ref name="Gallup 2006"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191223140748/https://news.gallup.com/poll/24487/gallup-database-2006-survey-results.aspx |date=23 December 2019 }}. Gallup. Retrieved 23 December 2019.</ref><ref name="Pew 2014">Kiley, Jocelyn (25 August 2014). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210407015513/https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/08/25/in-search-of-libertarians/ |date=7 April 2021 }}. Pew Research Center. "14% say the term libertarian describes them well; 77% of those know the definition (11% of total), while 23% do not (3% of total)."</ref><ref name="Reuters 2015">Becker, Amanda (30 April 2015). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190729055727/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-libertarians/americans-dont-like-big-government-but-like-many-programs-poll-idUSKBN0NL15B20150430 |date=29 July 2019 }}. Retrieved 31 October 2019.</ref><ref name="Gallup 2015">Boaz, David (10 February 2016). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031152246/https://www.cato.org/blog/gallup-finds-more-libertarians-electorate |date=31 October 2019 }}. Retrieved 31 October 2019.</ref> While most members of this group are not necessarily ideologically driven, the term ''libertarian'' is commonly used to describe the form of libertarianism widely practiced in the United States and is the common meaning of the word ''libertarianism'' in the U.S.<ref name="Carlson"/> This form is often named '']'' elsewhere such as in Europe, where ''liberalism'' has a different common meaning than in the United States.<ref name="FEE"/> In some academic circles, this form is called '']'' as a complement to '']'', with acceptance of capitalism or the private ownership of land as being the distinguishing feature.<ref name="Kymlicka"/><ref name="Goodway"/><ref name="Newman"/>
Criticisms of left-libertarianism have come from both the right and left alike. Right-libertarians like Robert Nozick hold that self-ownership and property acquisition need not meet egalitarian standards, they must merely follow the Lockean idea of not worsening the situation of others. ], an ] philosopher, has extensively criticized left-libertarianism's virtues of self-ownership and equality. In his ''Self-ownership, Freedom, and Equality'', Cohen claims that any system that takes equality and its enforcement seriously is not consistent with the robust freedom and full self-ownership of libertarian thought. ] of the Cato Institute has responded to Cohen's critique in 'Critical Review' and has provided a guide to the literature criticizing libertarianism in his bibliographical review essay on "The Literature of Liberty" in ''The Libertarian Reader'', ed. by David Boaz .


== History ==
===Ayn Rand's "Objectivism"===
=== Liberalism ===
]'' magazine dedicated an issue to ]'s influence one hundred years after her birth.]]
{{liberalism sidebar}}
{{main|Libertarianism and Objectivism}}
{{see also|History of liberalism}}
Libertarianism and ] have a complex relationship. Though they share many of the same political goals, many Objectivists see libertarians as plagiaristic. These Objectivists (including Ayn Rand) claim that libertarians use Objectivist ideas "with the teeth pulled out of them". Some libertarians see Objectivists as dogmatic, unrealistic, and uncompromising. According to ] editor ] in the magazine's ] ] issue focusing on Objectivism's influence, ] is "one of the most important figures in the libertarian movement... Rand remains one of the best-selling and most widely influential figures in American thought and culture" in general and in libertarianism in particular. Still, he confesses that he is embarrassed by his magazine's association with her ideas. In the same issue, ] says that "Libertarianism, the movement most closely connected to Rand's ideas, is less an offspring than a rebel stepchild." Though they reject what they see as Randian dogmas, libertarians like Young still believe that "Rand's message of reason and liberty... could be a rallying point" for libertarianism.
], regarded as the father of liberalism]]
Elements of libertarianism can be traced back to the higher-law concepts of the ] and the ], and ] who argued for the moral worth of the individual and the division of the world into two realms, one of which is the province of God and thus beyond the power of states to control it.<ref name="Boaz" /><ref name="cato.org">Boaz, David (21 November 1998). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191210055131/https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/preface-japanese-edition-libertarianism-primer |date=10 December 2019 }}. ]. Retrieved 10 December 2019.</ref> The ] economist ] suggested that Chinese ] philosopher ] was the first libertarian,<ref>Rothbard, Murray (2005). Excerpt from "Concepts of the Role of Intellectuals in Social Change Toward Laissez Faire", ''The Journal of Libertarian Studies'', Vol. IX, No. 2 (Fall 1990) at {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141108220713/http://mises.org/daily/1967 |date=8 November 2014 }}</ref> likening Laozi's ideas on government to ]'s theory of ].<ref>Rothbard, Murray (2005). "The Ancient Chinese Libertarian Tradition", ''Mises Daily'' (5 December 2005) (original source unknown) at {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141108220713/http://mises.org/daily/1967 |date=8 November 2014 }}</ref> Similarly, the ]'s ] includes passages from the '']'' in his 1997 book ''The Libertarian Reader'' and noted in an article for the ''Encyclopædia Britannica'' that Laozi advocated for rulers to "do nothing" because "without law or compulsion, men would dwell in harmony".<ref name="Boaz2">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Libertarianism |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/339321/libertarianism |access-date=21 February 2017 |date=30 January 2009 |author-link=David Boaz |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150504222253/https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/339321/libertarianism |archive-date=4 May 2015 |quote=An appreciation for spontaneous order can be found in the writings of the ancient Chinese philosopher Lao-tzu (6th century bce), who urged rulers to "do nothing" because "without law or compulsion, men would dwell in harmony." |author=Boaz, David |url-status=live}}</ref> Libertarianism was influenced by debates within ] regarding private property and ].<ref name="Boaz" /> Scholastic thinkers, including ], ], and ], argued for the concept of "self-mastery" as the foundation of a system supporting individual rights.<ref name="Boaz" />


Early Christian sects such as the ] displayed libertarian attitudes.<ref name="Mullett 2014 p. 9">{{cite book |last=Mullett |first=M.A. |title=Martin Luther |publisher=Taylor & Francis |series=Routledge Historical Biographies |year=2014 |isbn=978-1-317-64861-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WzaDBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA9 |access-date=2023-03-12 |page=9}}</ref><ref name="More 1969 p. ">{{cite book |last=More |first=T. |title=Complete Works |publisher=] |issue=v. 5, pt. 2 |year=1969 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NjmaAAAAIAAJ&q=%22waldensians%22+%22libertarian%22 |access-date=2023-03-12 |page=}}</ref> In 17th-century England, libertarian ideas began to take modern form in the writings of the ] and ]. In the middle of that century, opponents of royal power began to be called ], or sometimes simply Opposition or Country, as opposed to Court writers.<ref name="libertarianism.org">Boaz, David (7 March 2007). . ''Libertarianism.org''. ]. Retrieved 4 July 2013. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120716203439/http://www.libertarianism.org/ex-3.html|date=16 July 2012}}</ref>
Objectivists often disagree with the ] or improperly-termed ] of many libertarians. They argue that when it is in a nation's self-interest (defensive or "zero-sum game" survival interest) to do so, the state can and should act militarily abroad, even proactively (but typically only to ensure that the world does not fall to a totalitarian regime). Many also would like to see the state more aggressively protect the rights of US individuals and corporations abroad - that would include military action in response to nationalization. They more generally disagree with libertarians who typically consider state and government "necessary evils". For Objectivists, a government limited to protection of its citizens' rights is an absolutely necessary and moral institution. Objectivists are opposed to all anarchist currents and are suspicious of libertarians' lineage with ].


During the 18th century and ], ] ideas flourished in Europe and North America.<ref>Garbooshian, Adrina Michelle (2006). ''The Concept of Human Dignity in the French and American Enlightenments: Religion, Virtue, Liberty''. ProQuest. p. 472. {{ISBN|978-0542851605}}. "Influenced by Locke and Smith, certain segments of society affirmed classical liberalism, with a libertarian bent."</ref><ref>Cantor, Paul A. (2012). ''The Invisible Hand in Popular Culture: Liberty Vs. Authority in American Film and TV''. ]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200109171051/https://books.google.com/books?id=pZjuIM7ziMkC&pg=PR13&dq=Libertarians+influenced+by+classical+liberal&sa=X#v=onepage&q=Libertarians%20influenced%20by%20classical%20liberal |date=9 January 2020 }}.
==Libertarian politics==
{{ISBN|978-0813140827}}. "he roots of libertarianism lie in the classical liberal tradition".</ref> Libertarians of various schools were influenced by liberal ideas.<ref name=":0">Otero, Carlos Peregrin, ed. (1994). ''Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments, Volumes 2–3''. Taylor & Francis. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200109171044/https://books.google.com/books?id=MRdIAV5IVgoC&pg=PA617&dq=enlightenment+influence+socialists+libertarians&sa=X&ct=result&resnum=1 |date=9 January 2020 }}. {{ISBN|978-0415106948}}.</ref> For philosopher Roderick T. Long, libertarians "share a common—or at least an overlapping—intellectual ancestry. claim the seventeenth century English Levellers and the eighteenth century French ] among their ideological forebears; and usually share an admiration for ] and ]."<ref>{{cite journal |last=Long |first=Roderick T. |year=1998 |title=Toward a Libertarian Theory of Class |journal=] |volume=15 |issue=2 |page=310 |doi=10.1017/s0265052500002028 |s2cid=145150666}}</ref>
] turns it to a plane to repose libertarianism in a wider gamut of political thought.]]


], whose theory of property showed a libertarian concern with the unequal distribution of resources under statism]]
Especially in the ] and ], libertarianism is often looked at as a ] philosophy, especially by non-libertarians, since in those two countries, libertarians tend to have more in common with traditional ] than ], especially with regards to economic and ] policies. However, many often describe libertarians as being "conservative" on economic issues and "liberal" on social issues. Most libertarians also consider a "Constitutional Republic" (a Republic limited sharply by the United States' Constitution) to be a better form of government than what is typically recognized as an "unrestricted" Democracy, which they see as "the tyranny of the majority". (For example, as constitutionalist republicans, most libertarians view Texas congressman Ron Paul (R-14) to be a philosophical libertarian, even though he is technically affiliated with the "Republican" Party.)
John Locke greatly influenced both libertarianism and the modern world in his writings published before and after the ], especially '']'' (1667), '']'' (1689) and '']'' (1690). In the text of 1689, he established the basis of liberal political theory, i.e. that people's rights existed before government; that the purpose of government is to protect personal and property rights; that people may dissolve governments that do not do so; and that representative government is the best form to protect rights.<ref>Boaz, David (2010). ''The Libertarian Reader: Classic and Contemporary Writings from Lao Tzu to Milton Friedman''. ]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200213190518/https://books.google.com/books?id=cMs6OaHu6iEC&pg=PA123&dq=John+Locke+libertarian&sa=X#v=onepage&q=John%20Locke%20libertarian |date=13 February 2020 }}. {{ISBN|978-1439118337}}.</ref>


The ] was inspired by Locke in its statement: "o secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the ]. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it."<ref name=Rothbard1>Rothbard, Murray (1973) . {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150618045238/http://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard121.html |date=18 June 2015 }}. In '']''. ]. Retrieved 10 December 2019.</ref> According to American historian ], during and after the ], "the major themes of eighteenth-century libertarianism were brought to realization" in ]s, ], and limits on legislative and executive powers, including limits on starting wars.<ref name="Boaz" />
This is not necessarily an accurate description, since the philosophy really doesn't fall strictly into a left-right designation. Libertarians reject the categorization of their political philosophy in term of ] and ]. For example, libertarianism opposes the illegalization of drugs and the prohibition of "]".


According to ], the libertarian creed emerged from the liberal challenges to an "absolute central State and a king ruling by divine right on top of an older, restrictive web of feudal land monopolies and urban guild controls and restrictions" as well as the ] of a bureaucratic warfaring state allied with privileged merchants. The object of liberals was individual liberty in the economy, in personal freedoms and civil liberty, separation of state and religion and peace as an alternative to imperial aggrandizement. He cites Locke's contemporaries, the Levellers, who held similar views. Also influential were the English '']'' during the early 1700s, reprinted eagerly by ] who already were free of European aristocracy and feudal land monopolies.<ref name=Rothbard1/>
Another way to understand where libertarians fit into the political spectrum would be to contrast the view with both liberalism, which favors government action to promote equality, and conservativism, which favors government action to promote order. Libertarianism favors freedom and opposes government action to promote either equality or order, in the understanding that order is emergent from a state of justice. For example, conservatives are likely to support a ban on same-sex marriage, in the interests of preserving the traditional order, liberals are likely to favor allowing same-sex marriage, in the interest of guaranteeing equality under the law, and libertarians are likely to attack the notion of government-sanctioned marriage itself. In specific, they typically deny that the government deserves any role in marriage other than enforcing whatever legal contract people choose to bind themselves to, and to oppose the various additional rights currently granted to married people.


In January 1776, only two years after coming to America from England, Thomas Paine published his pamphlet '']'' calling for independence for the colonies.<ref name=Sprading>Sprading, Charles T. (1913) . ''Liberty and the Great Libertarians''. ]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200805003223/https://books.google.com/books?id=STQJ_DjQuw8C&pg=PA74&dq=Thomas+Paine+libertarian&sa=X#v=onepage&q=Thomas%20Paine%20libertarian |date=5 August 2020 }}. {{ISBN|978-1610161077}}.</ref> Paine promoted liberal ideas in clear and concise language that allowed the general public to understand the debates among the political elites.<ref>Hoffman, David C. (Fall 2006). "Paine and Prejudice: Rhetorical Leadership through Perceptual Framing in Common Sense". ''Rhetoric and Public Affairs''. '''9''' (3): 373–410.</ref> ''Common Sense'' was immensely popular in disseminating these ideas,<ref>Maier, Pauline (1997). ''American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence''. New York City: Knopf. pp. 90–91.</ref> selling hundreds of thousands of copies.<ref>{{cite book |last=Hitchens |first=Christopher |title=Thomas Paine's Rights of Man |year=2006 |isbn=0802143830 |publisher=] |page=37}}</ref> Paine would later write the '']'' and '']'' and participate in the ].<ref name=Sprading/> Paine's theory of property showed a "libertarian concern" with the unequal distribution of resources under statism.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Lamb |first=Robert |year=2010 |title=Liberty, Equality, and the Boundaries of Ownership: Thomas Paine's Theory of Property Rights |journal=Review of Politics |volume=72 |issue=3 |pages=483–511 |doi=10.1017/s0034670510000331 |hdl=10871/9896 |s2cid=55413082 |hdl-access=free}}</ref>
The related case of discrimination in the workplace is perhaps even more illuminating. Here, liberals would typically support laws to penalize employers for discrimination on a basis unrelated to the ability to do the job, conservatives would typically allow or even encourage such discrimination, but libertarians could be expected to oppose any laws on this matter because these would infringe on the property rights of both the business owner and the justly-hired employees. In other words, even if a particular libertarian feels strongly that various groups being discriminated against should have equality, he would say that intervening to establish this equality should not be the role of the government. If a business discriminates against you, you are "free" to work elsewhere, or possibly start your own business which follows your personal belief structure. The libertarians ability to distinguish between equality and freedom in this instance demonstrates his belief that equality of position is not a necessary condition of freedom, especially the freedom to enter into agreements in an un-coerced manner. By endorsing such things as the freedom to discriminate, libertarianism supports freedom of association which is the foundation of human rights.


In 1793, ] wrote a libertarian philosophical treatise titled '']'' which criticized ideas of human rights and of society by contract based on vague promises. He took liberalism to its logical anarchic conclusion by rejecting all political institutions, law, government and apparatus of coercion as well as all political protest and insurrection. Instead of institutionalized justice, Godwin proposed that people influence one another to moral goodness through informal reasoned persuasion, including in the associations they joined as this would facilitate happiness.<ref>{{cite book |last=Ousby |first=Ian |date=1993 |title=The Cambridge Guide to Literature in English |publisher=] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oeZ226OlfbkC&dq=Political+Ideology+Today+william+godwin+libertarian&pg=PA305 |page=305 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220323172830/https://books.google.com/books?id=oeZ226OlfbkC&pg=PA305&dq=Political+Ideology+Today+william+godwin+libertarian&sa=X#v=onepage&q=Political%20Ideology%20Today%20william%20godwin%20libertarian |archive-date=23 March 2022 |isbn=978-0521440868}}</ref>
Instead of a "left-right" spectrum, some libertarians use a two-dimensional space, with "personal freedom" on one axis and "economic freedom" on the other, which is called the ]. Named after ], who designed the chart and also founded the ], the chart is similar to a socio-political test used to place individuals by the ]. A first approximation of libertarian politics (derived from these charts) is that they agree with liberals on social issues and with conservatives on economic issues. Thus, the traditional linear scale of governmental philosophy could be represented inside the chart stretching from the upper left corner to the lower right, while the degree of state control is represented linearly from the lower left to the upper right. (See below for criticism of this chart and its use.)


=== Libertarian socialism (1857–1980s) ===
== The libertarian movement ==
{{libertarian socialism sidebar}}
] is an international project to define and document key current and potential voluntary replacements of government programs.
{{main|Libertarian socialism}}
Anarchist communist philosopher ] was the first person to describe himself as a ''libertarian<ref name="Dejacque">Joseph Déjacque. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190917184843/http://joseph.dejacque.free.fr/ecrits/lettreapjp.htm|date=17 September 2019}} (in French).</ref>'' in an 1857 letter.<ref>Joseph Déjacque, (1857).</ref> Unlike mutualist anarchist philosopher ], he argued that "it is not the product of his or her labor that the worker has a right to, but to the satisfaction of his or her needs, whatever may be their nature".<ref name="Graham-2005">Robert Graham, ''Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas – Volume One: From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939)'', Black Rose Books, 2005</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190625040912/http://joseph.dejacque.free.fr/libertaire/n06/lib01.htm |date=25 June 2019 }}, article in ''Le Libertaire'' no 6, 21 September 1858, New York.</ref> According to anarchist historian ], the first use of the term ''libertarian communism'' was in November 1880, when a French anarchist congress employed it to identify its doctrines more clearly.<ref>{{cite book|title=A Short History of Anarchism|last=Nettlau|first=Max|author-link=Max Nettlau|year=1996|publisher=Freedom Press|isbn=0-900384-89-1|page=145}}</ref> The French anarchist journalist ] started the weekly paper ''Le Libertaire'' (''The Libertarian'') in 1895.<ref>{{cite book|title=A Short History of Anarchism|last=Nettlau|first=Max|author-link=Max Nettlau|year=1996|publisher=Freedom Press|isbn=0-900384-89-1|page=162}}</ref>


], prominent French theorist of libertarian communism as well as atheist and freethought militant]]
Some, such as ], executive vice president of the libertarian U.S ], the ], argue that the term ''classical liberalism'' should be reserved for early liberal thinkers for the sake of clarity and accuracy, and because of differences between many libertarian and classical liberal thinkers. Nevertheless, the Cato Institute's official stance is that classical liberalism and libertarianism are synonymous; they prefer the term "liberal" to describe themselves, but choose not to use it because of its confusing connotation in some English-speaking countries (most self-described liberals prefer a ] rather than a free market economy). The Cato Institute dislikes adding "classical" because, in their view, "the word 'classical' connotes a backward-looking philosophy". Thus, they finally settle on "libertarian", as it avoids backward implications and confused definitions.


The ] saw the active participation of anarchists in Russia and Europe. Russian anarchists participated alongside the ]s in both the ] and ] 1917 revolutions. However, Bolsheviks in central Russia quickly began to imprison or drive underground the libertarian anarchists. Many fled to Ukraine.<ref>{{cite book|last=Avrich|first=Paul|title=The Russian Anarchists|publisher=AK Press|location=Stirling|year=2006|isbn=1904859488|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5pqSkSgKacAC&q=The+Russian+Anarchists+libertarian&pg=PA195|pages=195, 204|access-date=26 October 2020|archive-date=23 March 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220323162647/https://books.google.com/books?id=5pqSkSgKacAC&q=The+Russian+Anarchists+libertarian&pg=PA195|url-status=live}}</ref> After the anarchist ] helped stave off the ] during the ], the Bolsheviks turned on the Makkhnovists and contributed to the schism between the anarcho-syndicalists and the Communists.<ref>{{cite book|editor1-last=Drachkovitch|editor1-first=Milorad M.|first=Max|last=Nomad|author-link=Max Nomad|contribution=The Anarchist Tradition|title=The Revolutionary Internationals, 1864–1943|publisher=Stanford University Press|page=88|year=1966|isbn=0804702934|chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/revolutionaryint0000unse_y9l9/page/88/mode/2up}}</ref>
Libertarians and their allies are not a homogeneous group, but have collaborated to form ]s, ], and other projects. For example, Austrian School economist ] co-founded the ], the ], and the ] to support an independent libertarian movement, and joined ] in founding the ] in ]. (Rothbard ceased activity with the Libertarian Party in ] and some of his followers like ] are hostile to the group.) In the U.S. today, some libertarians support the Libertarian Party, some support no party, and some attempt to work within more powerful parties despite their differences. The ] (a wing of the ]) promotes libertarian views. A similar organization, the ], exists within the ], but is less organized. Republican Congressman ] is also a member of the Libertarian Party and was once its presidential candidate.


With the rise of ] in Europe between the 1920s and the 1930s, anarchists began to fight fascists in Italy,<ref>Holbrow, Marnie, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130729114710/http://www.socialistreview.org.uk/article.php?articlenumber=8205 |date=29 July 2013 }} (''Socialist Review'', November 2002).</ref> in France during the ]<ref>Berry, David. "Fascism or Revolution." ''Le Libertaire''. August 1936.</ref> and in Spain where the ] (Confederación Nacional del Trabajo) boycott of elections led to a right-wing victory and its later participation in voting in 1936 helped bring the popular front back to power. This led to a ruling class attempted coup and the ] (1936–1939).<ref>Antony Beevor, ''The Battle for Spain: The Spanish Civil War 1936–1939'', Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2006, p. 46, {{ISBN|978-0297848325}}.</ref> Gruppo Comunista Anarchico di Firenze held that during the early twentieth century, the terms libertarian communism and anarchist communism became synonymous within the international anarchist movement as a result of the close connection they had in Spain (]), with ''libertarian communism'' becoming the prevalent term.<ref>Gruppo Comunista Anarchico di Firenze (October 1979). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171018191416/http://www.fdca.it/fdcaen/historical/vault/ancom-libcom.htm |date=18 October 2017 }}. ''L'informatore di parte''. '''4'''.</ref>
] is one of the most successful libertarian political parties in the world.]]]'s ] (Libertarian Movement) is a prominent non-U.S. libertarian party that occupies roughly 10% of Costa Rica's national legislature. The Movimiento Libertario is considered the first libertarian organization in history to achieve substantial electoral success at the national level.
] ] during the ]]]
Libertarian socialism reached its apex of popularity with the ], during which libertarian socialists led "the largest and most successful revolution against capitalism to ever take place in any industrial economy".{{Sfn|Hahnel|2005|p=138}} During the revolution, the ] were brought under ] and ] formed the basis for the new economy.{{Sfn|Hahnel|2005|p=145}} According to ], the CNT established an agrarian federation in the Levante that encompassed 78% of Spain's most ]. The regional federation was populated by 1,650,000 people, 40% of whom lived on the region's 900 agrarian collectives, which were self-organised by peasant unions.{{Sfn|Hahnel|2005|pp=143–144}} Although industrial and agricultural production was at its highest in the anarchist-controlled areas of the Spanish Republic, and the ] displayed the strongest military discipline, liberals and communists alike blamed the "]" libertarian socialists for the defeat of the Republic in the ]. These charges have been disputed by contemporary libertarian socialists, such as Robin Hahnel and Noam Chomsky, who have accused such claims of lacking substantial evidence.{{Sfn|Hahnel|2005|pp=146–147}}


During the autumn of 1931, the "Manifesto of the 30" was published by militants of the anarchist trade union CNT and among those who signed it there was the CNT General Secretary (1922–1923) Joan Peiro, ] CNT (General Secretary in 1929) and Juan Lopez Sanchez. They were called ''treintismo'' and they were calling for ] which advocated achieving libertarian socialist ends with participation inside structures of contemporary ].<ref>Jesus Ruiz. ''Posibilismo libertario. Felix Morga, Alcalde de Najera (1891–1936)''. El Najerilla-Najera. 2003.</ref> In 1932, they established the ], which participated in the 1936 Spanish general elections and proceeded to be a part of the leftist coalition of parties known as the ] obtaining two congressmen (Pestaña and Benito Pabon). In 1938, Horacio Prieto, general secretary of the CNT, proposed that the ] transform itself into the Libertarian Socialist Party and that it participate in the national elections.<ref name="Renof">Renof, Israël Renof (May 1968). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161029044956/http://archivesautonomies.org/IMG/pdf/anarchismes/apres-1944/noiretrouge/NR-n41.pdf |date=29 October 2016 }} (PDF). ''Noir et Rouge''. '''41''': 16–23.</ref>
The Hong Kong Liberal Party is another example of a political party with libertarian leanings on the economic level. It is the second largest political party in the Legislative Council, however the majority of the party's success are a result of Hong Kong's unique electoral system which allows business groups to elect half the legislature while the other half is directly elected.


], American libertarian socialist theorist and proponent of ] and ]]]
There are other ] that have had various amounts of success throughout the world. Libertarianism is emerging in ] with the inception of ] ("Cherished Liberty"), a thinktank and activist association that has 2000 members. Liberté Chérie gained significant publicity when it managed to draw 80,000 Parisians into the streets to demonstrate against government employees who were striking.
The ''Manifesto of Libertarian Communism'' was written in 1953 by Georges Fontenis for the ''Federation Communiste Libertaire'' of France. It is one of the key texts of the anarchist-communist current known as ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://libcom.org/library/manifesto-of-libertarian-communism-georges-fontenis|title=Manifesto of Libertarian Communism – Georges Fontenis|website=libcom.org|access-date=13 June 2012|archive-date=23 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191023030214/http://libcom.org/library/manifesto-of-libertarian-communism-georges-fontenis|url-status=live}}</ref> In 1968, the ] was founded during an international anarchist conference in ], Italy to advance libertarian solidarity. It wanted to form "a strong and organized workers movement, agreeing with the libertarian ideas".<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120119000946/http://www.iisg.nl/archives/en/files/l/10760196.php |date=19 January 2012 }} International Institute of Social History. Retrieved 19 January 2010.</ref><ref name="Short history of the IAF-IFA"> A-infos news project, Accessed 19 January 2010.</ref> In the United States, the ] was founded in New York City in 1954 as a left-libertarian political organization building on the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://thevillager.com/2012/01/19/the-left-libertarians-the-last-of-an-ancient-breed/|title=The Left-Libertarians – the last of an ancient breed – The Villager Newspaper|work=The Villager|date=25 January 2012|access-date=2 July 2013|archive-date=2 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130902031925/http://thevillager.com/2012/01/19/the-left-libertarians-the-last-of-an-ancient-breed/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>'']'' by ]. AK Press. 2005. pp. 471–472.</ref> Members included ],<ref>Avrich, Paul. ''Anarchist Voices: An Oral History of Anarchism in America'', AK Press, p. 419.</ref> ], ], ]<ref>''Anarchist Voices: An Oral History Of Anarchism In America'' by Paul Avrich. AK Press. 2005.</ref> and ].


In Australia, the ] was a predominantly left-wing intellectual subculture in ] from the late 1940s to the early 1970s which became associated with the label Sydney libertarianism. Well known associates of the Push include ], ], ], ], Sasha Soldatow,<ref>A 1970s associate, subject of ]'s {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171018184842/http://www.smh.com.au/news/obituaries/a-spirit-gone-to-another-place/2006/09/08/1157222325334.html |date=18 October 2017 }} ''The Sydney Morning Herald'' obituary, 9 September 2006.</ref> ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. Amongst the key intellectual figures in Push debates were philosophers David J. Ivison, ], Roelof Smilde, Darcy Waters and Jim Baker, as recorded in Baker's memoir ''Sydney Libertarians and the Push'', published in the libertarian ''Broadsheet'' in 1975.<ref>Baker, A. J. (2 February 1998). . Takver's Initiatives. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191016205235/http://www.takver.com/history/aia/aia00026.htm|date=16 October 2019}}. from the 3 March 2016 at the ]. Neale Morison memorial site. Retrieved 2 May 2020.</ref> An understanding of libertarian values and social theory can be obtained from their publications, a few of which are available online.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.takver.com/history/sydney/indexsl.htm#waters|title=Sydney Libertarians and Anarchism Index|last=Takver|access-date=4 October 2013|archive-date=29 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190629215739/http://www.takver.com/history/sydney/indexsl.htm#waters|url-status=live}}</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131005074543/http://marxists.architexturez.net/history/australia/libertarians/index.htm |date=5 October 2013 }} at the Marxists Internet Archive.</ref>
In ], the ] was founded by ], a political scientist and libertarian activist who argued that 20,000 libertarians should migrate to a single U.S. state in order to concentrate their activism. In August of ], the membership of the Free State Project chose ]. However, as of ], there are concerns over the low rate of growth in signed Free State Project participants. In addition, discontented Free State Project participants, in protest of the choice of New Hampshire, started rival projects, including the ], and , a project for a Free Alaskan Nation, to concentrate activism in a different state or region. There is also a .


In 1969, French ] anarcho-communist ] published an essay in 1969 called "Libertarian Marxism?" in which he dealt with the debate between ] and ] at the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.revoltlib.com/?id=1352|title=Libertarian Marxism? – The Anarchist Library|date=6 February 2017|access-date=16 April 2020|archive-date=19 April 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220419203439/http://www.revoltlib.com/anarchism/libertarian-marxism-hands-of-the-state-guerin-daniel-1969/|url-status=live}}</ref> Libertarian Marxist currents often draw from Marx and Engels' later works, specifically the '']'' and '']''.<ref>Ernesto Screpanti, ''Libertarian communism: Marx Engels and the Political Economy of Freedom,'' Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2007.</ref>
===Controversies among libertarians===
{{cleanup-section|March 2006}}
These controversies are addressed in separate articles:
*]: Most libertarians support ] and ] because they believe that people should be able to start and grow ], manufacture, transport, trade, buy, and sell with little interference from the government. Some may support efforts to limit private monopolies. Some libertarians like ] prefer ]s like ] to the ''status quo'' while others like ] see such programs as a threat to private industry and as a covert means of expanding government.
*]: Most libertarians oppose forced redistribution and government welfare because they consider forced redistribution as a form of "legalized theft." Some may support minimal, temporary public support.
*]: Most libertarians support low taxes and a balanced budget because they believe citizens should keep most of the money they earn, while more extreme libertarians, ], believe in abolishing taxes altogether.
* ]: Most libertarians ally politically with modern conservatives over economic issues. On foreign policy, civil liberties, and some social issues, libertarians ally with modern liberals. Others ally with ], ] ], despite sharp disagreement on economic and social issues. Others refuse to ally with any political party other than their own, and will never vote for a mainstream candidate. Most voting libertarians typically will only vote for a candidate that is philosopically libertarian, the only good example of which in the U.S. are a few philosophically-proven libertarian Republicans like congressman Ron Paul (TX-R-14) and Michigan Leon Drolet. Those that choose to vote for whichever main party matches their goals and ideals are called small-l libertarians (l) or "philosophical libertarians" due to the fact that they are more willing to compromise to advance individual liberty. In the ] a small number of "small-l libertarians" advocated Howard Dean for president in the primaries, due to his belief in gun rights and his moderate approval of free trade, and their fear of John Kerry and George Bush as even worse political choices. A small number of philosophical libertarians voted for George Bush fearing John Kerry would be even less in favor of free trade than Bush. A vastly greater number of philosophical libertarians either abstained from voting entirely (typically in their belief that the Libertarian Candidate for 2004 was poorly-chosen), or voted for the 2004 Libertarian Presidential Candidate, ], anyway, believing both major party choices in 2004 were so politically similar that there was no significant difference between them. Often times, Libertarians vote for whom they believe will lose an election in order to make the election closer, to fight the idea that either of the two freedom-opposing major parties has a "mandate."
* ]: Some libertarians believe that property rights in ideas (and other intangibles) should be identical to property rights in physical goods, as they see both justified by natural rights. Others justify ] for utilitarian reasons. They argue that intellectual property rights are required to maximize innovation. Still others believe that "intellectual property" is a euphemism for ] and altogether.
* ]: Libertarians of the Natural Law variety generally support freedom of movement, but more nationalistic and inconsistent libertarians argue that open borders amount to legalized trespassing. The debate often centers on self-ownership of our bodies and whether we have the freedom to hire anyone without the federal government's permission. Another form of the debate centers on the political exploitation of the perception that immigrants often abuse tax-funded government resources, and that the demand would be lessened if there were fewer immigrants. Libertarians in the United States' Southern border states thus often find themselves in the position of appearing to endorse restrictions on immigration (to remain electorally viable), while endorsing the enforcement of existing laws (out of necessity of eliminating corruption and favoritism), while intending to change the unjust laws by eliminating tax-funded labor for all, while seeking to allow immigration. This is the purest libertarian resolution possible until the public is better educated on the issue. "Consequentialist libertarians" may decide the issue in terms of what is best for the economy.
* ]: A controversy is the role of the state in regulating ], if it is in fact unethical. In the United States, some on both sides of this debate agree that this should be settled by the states instead of the federal government, thereby invalidating '']'' on grounds that the federal government violates traditional state self-police powers. American libertarians who are not states-rights advocates, on the other hand, prefer for the issue to be settled at whatever level of government (or no level of government, if they are ]) will reach the best decision. A small number of libertarians view abortion to be an initiation of force against the fetus, and therefore wrong, although the majority of libertarians view the fetus' early stages of development to be under the control of the female or individual(s) bearing responsibility for its development.
* ]: Some libertarians support the ] on ] or ] grounds. Others see it as an excessive abuse of state power. Many consitutionalist libertarians disavow the death penalty for its irreversible nature, as well as its perceived conflict with the Bill of Rights' ban on "cruel and unusual punishment".
* ]: Most libertarians are suspicious of government intervention in the affairs of other countries, especially violent intervention. (such as those influenced by Objectivism) argue that intervention is not unethical when a foreign government is abusing the rights of its citizens but whether a nation should intervene depends on its own self-interest.
* ]: Most libertarians feel that adults have a right to choose their own lifestyle or sexual preference, provided that such expression does not trample on the same freedom of other people to choose their own sexual preference or religious freedom. Yet, there has been some debate among libertarians as to how to respond to the issue of gay marriage. The controversy arises virtually entirely from the current involvement of the State in heterosexual marriage. The philosophically pure libertarian answer is to treat all marriage contracts as legal contracts only, and to require that the terms of the marriage are spelled out clearly in the contract, allowing any number of legal adults to marry under any conditions that are legally enforceable, thus ending the implicit government-endorsement of all marriage contracts, including heterosexual ones. If the state no longer endorses only certain marriages as legitimate, there is no inequality, and gays, lesbians, polygamists, etc... can all draw up their own private legal contracts, just the same as heterosexuals could. The controversy arises from the fact that the State assumes that heterosexuals who did not draw up pre-nuptual agreements entered into a commonly recognized Christian ritual union that entitles the united parties to the use of the State's legal system as a means of cheaply filing a record of their marriage and of resolving disputes. This system is widely used by heterosexuals who have not prepared for the likelihood of divorce and later contractual dispute. Although the system is currently thus flawed, it is popular, and being that the grass is always greener on the other side, many gays who wish to marry seem to now want the same free ability to turn to the state in hopes that the same government assumptions of tax-funded contract protection that occasionally benefits heterosexuals. The dilemma for most libertarians arises from the fact that a currently unjust situation is popular. Heterosexuals currently have tax-funded protection and the assumption of enforceable contract resolution for their marriage contracts. Homosexuals often desire inclusion in this flawed system. Libertarians then, are caught in the situation of trying to expand an unjust system to grant incorrectly-perceived benefits, or to deny certain parties membership within that unjust system. Many libertarians advocate the concept that there can be no such thing as a just separation of people into differing status groups under the law, so the current definition of marriage must include all those who wish to marry, with the later goal of eliminating this increased role of government in marriage entirely. It is thus the consistent view amongst all libertarians that the best resolution of inequalities under the law for gays would best be resolved by eliminating all state involvement in marriage (for heterosexuals, gays, polygamists, etc...), rendering every living human exactly equal under the law. Failing that, it is commonly understood amongst politically-savvy libertarians that libertarian candidates must speak in generalities that allow voters who wish to remain ignorant of the complexities of the issue to do so, by believing that the Libertarian Party endorses whatever poorly-constructed half-solution they personally endorse. This is a necessary technique in the pursuit of electoral office which is used to prevent the necessity of violence towards the end of preserving individual rights.
* ]: Libertarians may disagree over what to do in absence of a will or contract in the event of death, and over posthumous property rights. In the event of a contract, the contract is enforced according to the property owner's wishes. Typically, libertarians believe that any unwilled property goes to remaining living relatives, and ideally, none of the property goes to the government in such a case. Many libertarians advocate the establishments of trusts to avoid taxation of property at the time of death.
* ]: Some libertarians, (such as ] and ]) want to avoid ] through private ownership of all natural resources, while others (such as ]s) believe that such resources (especially land) cannot be considered property.
* ]: A small number of libertarians grant basic rights to animals (they count as individuals and therefore have the right not to be subjected to coercion), while others see animals as property, and think their owners are free to treat them as they wish.


=== Libertarianism in the United States (1943–1980s) ===
The Libertarian Party approach to these issues is to say the focus is misplaced. Under the LP members agreed that party documents and officials must focus on voluntary solutions and not favor any particular mode, be it minarchism or anything else. On social issues the Platform focuses on voluntary alternatives and civil institutions, not coercive government, as the correct problems-solving entity. Those concerned about defense and immigration should look to the voluntary actions underway encouraged or performed by the Libertarian Party or allied movements. The correct solution to foreign woes is more Libertarian policies and presumably Libertarians in all countries.
{{Libertarianism US}}
{{main|Libertarianism in the United States}}
] and ] were the first prominent figures in the United States to describe themselves as ''libertarian'' as synonym for ''liberal''. They believed that ] had co-opted the word ''liberal'' for his ] policies which they opposed and used ''libertarian'' to signify their allegiance to ], ] and ].<ref name=Burns>{{cite book|title=Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand and the American Right|last=Burns|first=Jennifer|year=2009|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0195324877|location=New York|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z6e9X6JxHpMC&q=Goddess+of+the+Market+Nock+Menken&pg=PA306|page=309|access-date=26 October 2020|archive-date=23 March 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220323173916/https://books.google.com/books?id=z6e9X6JxHpMC&q=Goddess+of+the+Market+Nock+Menken&pg=PA306|url-status=live}}</ref>


According to ], in 1943 three women "published books that could be said to have given birth to the modern libertarian movement".<ref>Boaz, David (1997). ''The Libertarian Reader: Classic and Contemporary Readings from Lao-Tzu to Milton Friedman''. New York: Free Press. p. 31.</ref> ]'s '']'', ]'s ''The Discovery of Freedom'' and ]'s '']'' each promoted individualism and capitalism. None of the three used the term libertarianism to describe their beliefs and Rand specifically rejected the label, criticizing the burgeoning American libertarian movement as the "hippies of the right".<ref name="ari">{{cite web|title=What was Ayn Rand's view of the libertarian movement?|url=http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ar_libertarianism_qa|publisher=Ayn Rand Institute|quote=More specifically, I disapprove of, disagree with and have no connection with, the latest aberration of some conservatives, the so-called "hippies of the right," who attempt to snare the younger or more careless ones of my readers by claiming simultaneously to be followers of my philosophy and advocates of anarchism. libertarians are a monstrous, disgusting bunch of people: they plagiarize my ideas when that fits their purpose, and denounce me in a more vicious manner than any communist publication when that fits their purpose.|access-date=5 March 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140115095632/http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ar_libertarianism_qa|archive-date=15 January 2014|url-status=dead}}</ref> Rand accused libertarians of plagiarizing ideas related to her own philosophy of Objectivism and yet viciously attacking other aspects of it.<ref name="ari"/>
== Criticism of libertarianism ==
{{main|Criticism of libertarianism}}
] from both the ] and the ] claim that libertarian ideas about individual economic and social freedom are contradictory, untenable or undesirable. Critics from the left tend to focus on the economic consequences, claiming that perfectly ], or ] ], undermines individual freedom for many people by creating ], ], and lack of accountability for the most powerful. Criticism of libertarianism from the right tends to focus on issues of ] and personal morality, claiming that the extensive personal freedoms promoted by libertarians encourage unhealthy and immoral behavior and undermine religion. Libertarians mindful of such criticisms claim that personal responsibility, private ], and the voluntary exchange of goods and ideas are all consistent manifestations of an ] approach to liberty, and provide both a more effective and more ethical way to prosperity and peaceful coexistence. They often argue that in a truly capitalistic society, even the poorest would end up better off as a result of faster overall ] - which they believe likely to occur with lower taxes and less ].


In 1946, ] founded the ] (FEE), an American nonprofit educational organization which promotes the principles of ''laissez-faire'' economics, private property and limited government.<ref>{{cite book|last=Phillips-Fein|first=Kim|date=2009|title=Invisible Hands: The Making of the Conservative Movement from the New Deal to Reagan|url=https://archive.org/details/invisiblehandsma00phil|url-access=registration|location=New York|publisher=W. W. Norton|page=|isbn=978-0393059304}}</ref> According to ], the FEE is the "granddaddy of all libertarian organizations".<ref>Galles, Gary (2013). ''Apostle of Peace: The Radical Mind of Leonard Read''. Laissez Faire Books. {{ISBN|978-1621290513}}.</ref>
Conservatives often argue that the state is needed to maintain social order and morality. They may argue that excessive personal freedoms encourage dangerous and irresponsible behavior resulting in externalities indirectly paid for by the collective society. If negative behaviors adversely affect society, then taxation can help to relieve this market failure with a new allocation of resources. Some of the most commonly debated issues here are ]s, the ], and ]. Some, such as the conservative ] of '']'', consider libertarianism "a form of arrogant nihilism" that is both overly tolerant of nontraditional lifestyles (like ] addiction) and intolerant towards other political views. In the same article, he writes: "You don't turn children into responsible adults by giving them absolute freedom. You foster good character by limiting freedom, and by channeling energies into the most productive avenues. That's what all good schools, good families, and good societies do... pluralism ... a suicide pact." (Note: Libertarians do not advocate "absolute freedom," but insist that the freedom of action of each individual should be limited at the point where it would infringe on the freedom of others; also, it is very unusual for libertarians to advocate that children have the same liberty as adults).


], a speechwriter for ] and primary author of the Republican Party's 1960 and 1964 ], became disillusioned with traditional politics following the ] in which Goldwater lost to ]. He and his friend ], an ] economist, founded the journal '']'', which was published from 1965 to 1968, with George Resch and ]. In 1969, they edited '']'' which Hess left in 1971.<ref>Halle, Roland; Ladue, Peter (1980). ''Karl Hess: Toward Liberty''. Direct Cinema, Ltd. .</ref>
Some liberals, such as ] and ], argue that implied ]s and democracy justify government actions that harm some individuals so long as they are beneficial overall. They may further argue that rights and markets can function only among "a well-knit community of citizens" that rests on social obligations that libertarians reject. These critics argue that without this foundation, the libertarian form of government will either fail or be expanded beyond recognition.


The ] split the uneasy alliance between the growing numbers of American libertarians, on the one hand, and conservatives who believed in limiting liberty to uphold moral virtues on the other. Libertarians opposed to the war joined the ] and ]s as well as organizations such as ] (SDS). In 1969 and 1970, Hess joined with others, including Murray Rothbard, ], ], ] and former SDS leader ] to speak at two conferences which brought together activists from both the New Left and the Old Right in what was emerging as a nascent libertarian movement. Rothbard ultimately broke with the left, allying himself with the burgeoning ] movement.<ref>Raimondo, Justin (2001). ''An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard''. Amherst: Prometheus. pp. 277–278.</ref><ref>Doherty, Brian (2007). ''Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement''. New York: Public Affairs. pp. 562–565.</ref> He criticized the tendency of these libertarians to appeal to {{"'}}free spirits,' to people who don't want to push other people around, and who don't want to be pushed around themselves" in contrast to "the bulk of Americans" who "might well be tight-assed conformists, who want to stamp out drugs in their vicinity, kick out people with strange dress habits, etc.". Rothbard emphasized that this was relevant as a matter of strategy as the failure to pitch the libertarian message to Middle America might result in the loss of "the tight-assed majority".<ref>Rothbard, Murray (5 June 1986). "Letter to David Bergland". Rothbard emphasized that this was relevant as a matter of strategy, writing that the failure to pitch the libertarian message to Middle America might result in the loss of "the tight-assed majority".</ref><ref>Raimondo, Justin (2001). ''An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard''. Amherst: Prometheus. pp. 263–264.</ref> This ] tradition has been carried to the present day by Konkin's ]s,<ref>Konkin, Samuel Edward III. . {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140605094706/http://agorism.info/docs/NewLibertarianManifesto.pdf|date=5 June 2014}}. Retrieved 10 February 2020.</ref> contemporary mutualists such as ],<ref>Carson, Kevin A. (2008). ''Organization Theory: A Libertarian Perspective''. Charleston, SC: BookSurge.</ref> Roderick T. Long<ref>Long, Roderick T. (2008). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200327050439/https://en.liberalis.pl/2008/01/04/interview-with-roderick-long/ |date=27 March 2020 }}.</ref> and others such as ]<ref>Chartier, Gary (2009). ''Economic Justice and Natural Law''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</ref> Charles W. Johnson<ref>Johnson, Charles W. (2008). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200221202055/http://radgeek.com/gt/2010/03/02/liberty-equality-solidarity-toward-a-dialectical-anarchism/ |date=21 February 2020 }}. ''Anarchism/Minarchism: Is a Government Part of a Free Country?'' In Long, Roderick T.; Machan, Tibor. Aldershot: Ashgate pp. 155–188.</ref><ref>Chartier, Gary; Johnson, Charles W. (2011). ''Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty''. Brooklyn: Minor Compositions/Autonomedia. pp. 1–16.</ref> Sheldon Richman,<ref name="LibertarianLeft">Richman, Sheldon (3 February 2011). . ''The American Conservative''. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190610075037/https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/libertarian-left/|date=10 June 2019}}. Retrieved 5 March 2012.</ref> ]<ref>Sciabarra, Chris Matthew (2000). ''Total Freedom: Toward a Dialectical Libertarianism''. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.</ref> and Brad Spangler.<ref>Spangler, Brad (15 September 2006). . {{webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20110510102306/http://bradspangler.com/blog/archives/473|date=10 May 2011}}</ref>
The argument that ], promoted by many anarchists, would undermine almost all libertarian capitalist theory if successfully argued. Some also argue that current property owners obtained their property unfairly, and therefore lack rightful or complete claim. In the Americas, they argue, land was stolen from its ] owners, but applies in any context where critics believe the power of the rich enables them to gain unearned profits at the expense of their workers. More deeply, it suggests that the distinction between "initiating" and reacting with force lacks a principled basis.


], a self-described libertarian, whose presidential campaigns in ] and ] garnered significant support from youth and ]s]]
Other criticism focuses on economics. Critics argue that where libertarian economic theory (neo-classical and laissez-faire capitalism) has been implemented (as in ], 19th-century Britain, and 19th- and 20th-century U.S.), the results show that libertarian economic ideas threaten freedom, democracy, human rights, and economic growth. It ignores real market failures such as the human propensity for opportunistic behavior. In addition, some critics claim that libertarianism's ] would eliminate some essential services. A frequently cited example is ]; critics argue that a lack of medical knowledge among consumers, and what they believe to be a moral requirement of society to provide service for those who cannot pay, make sufficient health care impossible in a completely free market. These critics claim that a nationalized health care system provides better outcomes than does the market, and that health care, contrary to libertarian positions, is a ] justifying coercion.
In 1971, a small group led by ] formed the ],<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1abOEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA337 | title=Voting and Political Representation in America: Issues and Trends &#91;2 volumes&#93; | isbn=978-1-4408-6085-0 | last1=Jones | first1=Mark P. | date=24 February 2020 | publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing USA }}</ref> which has run a presidential candidate every election year since 1972. Other libertarian organizations, such as the ] and the Cato Institute, were also formed in the 1970s.<ref>.</ref> Philosopher ], a one-time member of Rand's inner circle, proposed a non-initiation of force principle to unite the movement. This statement later became a required "pledge" for members of the Libertarian Party. Hospers became the LP's first presidential candidate in 1972.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://71republic.com/2018/11/11/the-libertarian-party-history/|title=The Libertarian Party: A History From Hospers to Johnson|website=71 Republic|date=11 November 2018|access-date=22 March 2019|archive-date=22 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190322220233/https://71republic.com/2018/11/11/the-libertarian-party-history/|url-status=dead}}</ref>


Modern libertarianism gained significant recognition in academia with the publication of Harvard University professor ]'s '']'' in 1974, for which he received a National Book Award in 1975.<ref>National Book Foundation. . {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110909065656/http://www.nationalbook.org/nba1975.html|date=9 September 2011}}</ref> In response to ]' '']'', Nozick's book supported a ] (also called a nightwatchman state by Nozick) on the grounds that the ultraminimal state arises without violating individual rights<ref>Schaefer, David Lewis (30 April 2008). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140821170556/http://www.nysun.com/sports/reconsiderations-robert-nozick-and-coast-utopia |date=21 August 2014 }}. '']''.</ref> and the transition from an ultraminimal state to a minimal state is morally obligated to occur.
Such critics may argue that the libertarian definition of "]" (as visualized in the ]) is flawed because it ignores the effects that powerlessness and poverty have on liberty. Others argue that the associated political quiz is biased towards libertarianism or that the chart dismisses non-libertarian values. In particular, it portrays Libertarianism as being the greatest supporter for freedoms while failing to point out that only negative rights are endorsed. Libertarians respond by asserting that positive rights are unnatural rights, or rights by fiat.


In the early 1970s, Rothbard wrote: "One gratifying aspect of our rise to some prominence is that, for the first time in my memory, we, 'our side,' had captured a crucial word from the enemy. 'Libertarians' had long been simply a polite word for left-wing anarchists, that is for anti-private property anarchists, either of the communist or syndicalist variety. But now we had taken it over."<ref>Rothbard, Murray. (2009). ''The Betrayal of the American Right''. Ludwig von Mises Institute. {{ISBN|1610165012}}.</ref> The project of spreading libertarian ideals in the United States has been so successful that some Americans who do not identify as libertarian seem to hold libertarian views.<ref>{{cite book|title=Peak Oil: Apocalyptic Environmentalism and Libertarian Political Culture|last=Schneider-Mayerson|first=Matthew|isbn=978-0226285573|location=Chicago|oclc=922640625|date=14 October 2015}}</ref> Since the resurgence of neoliberalism in the 1970s, this modern American libertarianism has spread beyond North America via think tanks and political parties.<ref name="teles2008diffusion">Teles, Steven; Kenney, Daniel A. (2008). "Spreading the Word: The diffusion of American Conservatism in Europe and Beyond". In Steinmo, Sven (2007). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160113191632/https://books.google.com/books?id=Mfy3k0BWBNAC |date=13 January 2016 }}. ]. pp. 136–169.</ref><ref name="lewrockwell.com">Gregory, Anthony (24 April 2007).. LewRockwell.com. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150618072909/http://archive.lewrockwell.com/gregory/gregory136.html|date=18 June 2015}}</ref>
Others critics, such as ], editor of the journal ''Critical Review'', argue that libertarians oversimplify issues such as the efficacy of state intervention, shifting the ] to their opponents without justification. Friedman also argues that libertarian views on human nature consist more of "ideology and political crusading" than "scholarship," as when he claims that libertarians assume that people act to maximize their own utility or that their self-interested actions will always serve human needs better than government.


In a 1975 interview with ''Reason'', California Governor ] appealed to libertarians when he stated to "believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism".<ref name="rm200507">Klausner, Manuel (July 1975). . '']''. Retrieved May 2, 2020.</ref> ] ] supported ], being one of the first elected officials in the nation to support his campaign<ref name="Roberts 1988">{{cite journal |last=Roberts |first=Jerry |date=September 17, 1988 |title=Libertarian Candidate Rolls Out His Values |journal=San Francisco Chronicle}}</ref> and actively campaigned for Reagan in 1976 and 1980.<ref name="Nichols 1987">{{cite journal |last=Nichols |first=Bruce |date=March 15, 1987 |title=Ron Paul Wants to Get Americans Thinking: Republican-Turned-Libertarian Seeks Presidency |journal=Dallas Morning News}}</ref> However, Paul quickly became disillusioned with the Reagan administration's policies after Reagan's election in 1980 and later recalled being the only Republican to vote against Reagan budget proposals in 1981.<ref name="Kennedy 1988">{{cite journal |last=Kennedy |first=J. Michael |date=May 10, 1988 |title=Politics 88: Hopeless Presidential Race: Libertarian Plods On – Alone and Unheard |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-05-10-mn-2480-story.html |journal=Los Angeles Times |access-date=January 31, 2012}}</ref><ref name="Kutzmann 1988">{{cite journal |last=Kutzmann |first=David M. |date=May 24, 1988 |title=Small Party Battles Big Government Libertarian Candidate Opposes Intrusion into Private Lives |journal=San Jose Mercury News |page=12A}}</ref> In the 1980s, libertarians such as Paul and Rothbard<ref>Rothbard, Murray (1984). . ''Free Life: The Journal of the Libertarian Alliance''. Libertarian Alliance. ''''4''' (1): 1–7. Retrieved September 20, 2020 – via the Mises Institute.</ref><ref>Riggenbach, Jeff (February 5, 2011). . Mises Institute. Retrieved September 20, 2020.</ref> criticized President Reagan, ] and policies of the ] for, among other reasons, having turned the United States' big trade deficit into debt and the United States became a debtor nation for the first time since World War I under the ].<ref>Kilborn, Peter T. (September 17, 1985). . ''The New York Times''. Retrieved May 2, 2020.</ref><ref>Johnston, Oswald (September 17, 1985). . ''Los Angeles Times''. Retrieved May 2, 2020.</ref> Rothbard argued that the ] has been "a disaster for libertarianism in the United States"<ref>Weltch, Matt (September 9, 2011). . ''Reason''. Reason Foundation. Retrieved September 20, 2020.</ref> and Paul described Reagan himself as "a dramatic failure".<ref name="Nichols 1987" />
Some criticize the motives of libertarians, saying that they support libertarian ideas only because they serve as a means of justifying and maintaining what these critics perceive to be their position near the top of existing ]. For instance, '']'' columnist ] stated that "Libertarianism is uninformed capitalist greed in civil-rights clothing" and that there are "a few issues libertarians tend to ignore when talking about the promise of a future without government interference: inherent cultural disadvantage and affirmative action; public-works projects like freeways for all those new-money Jags around Silicon Valley; funding for the arts; child-abuse prevention and intervention; medical care for the elderly; and too many more to list. They are also not likely to complain loudly about capital-gains tax cuts or other tax breaks for corporations and the wealthy".


== Contemporary libertarianism ==
These critics contend that the support of WTO efforts by libertarians demonstrates that libertarians are satisfied with the global status quo and would like to "lock-in" the hegemonic advantages. Likewise, they say that libertarians view the very wealthy as having earned their place, while the classical liberals were often skeptical of the rich, businesses, and corporations, which they saw as aristocratic. ] in particular was critical of the growth of corporations, which such critics claim would form an important part of a libertarian society. Some libertarians, however, deny the legitimacy of corporations as being government constructs.
=== Contemporary libertarian socialism ===
] marching in Madrid in 2010]]
A surge of popular interest in libertarian socialism occurred in Western nations during the 1960s and 1970s.<ref>{{cite book |last=Thomas |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Thomas (Marx scholar) |title=] |publisher=]/] |location=London |year=1985 |isbn=0710206852 |page=4}}</ref> Anarchism was influential in the ]<ref>{{cite web|author=John Patten|url=http://www.katesharpleylibrary.net/dnckhs|title="These groups had their roots in the anarchist resurgence of the nineteen sixties. Young militants finding their way to anarchism, often from the anti-bomb and anti-Vietnam war movements, linked up with an earlier generation of activists, largely outside the ossified structures of 'official' anarchism. Anarchist tactics embraced demonstrations, direct action such as industrial militancy and squatting, protest bombings like those of the First of May Group and Angry Brigade—and a spree of publishing activity." "Islands of Anarchy: Simian, Cienfuegos, Refract and their support network" by John Patten|publisher=Katesharpleylibrary.net|date=28 October 1968|access-date=11 October 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604120204/http://www.katesharpleylibrary.net/dnckhs|archive-date=4 June 2011}}</ref><ref>"Farrell provides a detailed history of the Catholic Workers and their founders Dorothy Day and Peter Maurin. He explains that their pacifism, anarchism, and commitment to the downtrodden were one of the important models and inspirations for the 60s. As Farrell puts it, "Catholic Workers identified the issues of the sixties before the Sixties began, and they offered models of protest long before the protest decade." {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130406120402/http://library.nothingness.org/articles/SA/en/display/268 |date=6 April 2013 }}.</ref><ref>"While not always formally recognized, much of the protest of the sixties was anarchist. Within the nascent women's movement, anarchist principles became so widespread that a political science professor denounced what she saw as "The Tyranny of Structurelessness." Several groups have called themselves "Amazon Anarchists." After the ], the New York ] based their organization in part on a reading of ]'s anarchist writings." {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120419214254/http://www.williamapercy.com/images/Anarchism.pdf |date=19 April 2012 }}. p. 52.</ref> and anarchists actively participated in the ] which included students and workers' revolts.<ref>"Within the movements of the sixties there was much more receptivity to anarchism-in-fact than had existed in the movements of the thirties ... But the movements of the sixties were driven by concerns that were more compatible with an expressive style of politics, with hostility to authority in general and state power in particular ... By the late sixties, political protest was intertwined with cultural radicalism based on a critique of all authority and all hierarchies of power. Anarchism circulated within the movement along with other radical ideologies. The influence of anarchism was strongest among radical feminists, in the commune movement, and probably in the Weather Underground and elsewhere in the violent fringe of the anti-war movement." {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110317032203/http://www.monthlyreview.org/0901epstein.htm |date=17 March 2011 }}.</ref> In 1968, the International of Anarchist Federations was founded in Carrara, Italy during an international anarchist conference held there in 1968 by the three existing European federations of ], the ] and the ] as well as the Bulgarian Anarchist Federation in French exile.<ref name="Short history of the IAF-IFA"/><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120119000946/http://www.iisg.nl/archives/en/files/l/10760196.php |date=19 January 2012 }}, International Institute of Social History. Retrieved 19 January 2010.</ref>


Around the turn of the 21st century, libertarian socialism grew in popularity and influence as part of the anti-war, anti-capitalist and ]s.<ref name=rupert>{{cite book|page=|last=Rupert|first=Mark|title=Globalization and International Political Economy|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers|location=Lanham|year=2006|isbn=0742529436|url=https://archive.org/details/globalizationint00rupe/page/66}}</ref> Anarchists became known for their involvement in protests against the meetings of the ] (WTO), ] and the ]. Some anarchist factions at these protests engaged in rioting, property destruction and violent confrontations with police. These actions were precipitated by ad hoc, leaderless, anonymous cadres known as ]s and other organizational tactics pioneered in this time include ], ] and the use of decentralized technologies such as the Internet.<ref name=rupert/> A significant event of this period was the confrontations at ].<ref name=rupert/> For English anarchist scholar ], "contemporary anarchism can be seen as a powerful critique of the pseudo-libertarianism of contemporary ]. One might say that contemporary anarchism is about responsibility, whether sexual, ecological or socio-economic; it flows from an experience of conscience about the manifold ways in which the West ravages the rest; it is an ethical outrage at the yawning inequality, impoverishment and disenfranchisment that is so palpable locally and globally".<ref>'']'' by ]. ]. 2007. p. 125.</ref> This might also have been motivated by "the collapse of ']' and the capitulation to ] of Western ]".<ref>Chamsy el- Ojeili. ''Beyond post-socialism. Dialogues with the far-left.'' Palgrave Macmillan. 2015. p. 7.</ref>
Most economists agree that decentralized decision-making is an important part of efficient markets, but many economists argue that ]s tend to result unless government intervenes. While libertarians believe in the efficacy of free markets to allocate resources efficiently and equitably, they would not allow market forces to occasion any violations of individual '']''. Moreover, they oppose any coercion that would be employed to remedy what some perceive as "market failures", arguing that government intervention leads to ''government failure'', a cure worse than the disease.


Since the end of the ], there have been at least two major experiments in libertarian socialism: the ] in ], during which the ] (EZLN) enabled the formation of a ] ] in the Mexican state of ];{{Sfn|Pinta|Kinna|Prichard|Berry|2017}} and the ] in ], which established the ] (AANES) as a "libertarian socialist alternative to the colonially established state boundaries in the Middle East."{{Sfn|Pinta|Kinna|Prichard|Berry|2017}}
Some critics see the libertarian view of property rights as a threat to the environment, rather than a cure. They also claim that many aspects of the environment, such as scenic beauty, are extremely hard to valuate.


In 2022, student activist and self-described libertarian socialist ] became ] of ] after winning the ] with the {{lang|es|]|italic=no}} coalition.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /><ref name=":8" />
Some critics claim that libertarianism would enable slavery per the self-ownership property right, repeal of labor laws, via contractual labor agreements, outright sale of future labor rights, and/or as a punishment for a person with unpaid debts as an ]. There are even internal debates within libertarian camps as to the libertarian justification for contractual slavery and indentured labor ]. The new libertarian rejoinder is that one's body, as Thomas Jefferson said of ideas, is not the subject of property, so slavery is de facto illegal, as is ]. This view parallels the long-standing common law principle that rights are unalienable, a condition that could not be satisfied if rights were treated as ] (in the legal sense) and tradable commodities, even though this is not in any official libertarian platform, and the issue of voluntary servitude contracts are still debated within the libertarian ranks.


=== Contemporary libertarianism in the United States ===
Some critics point out that libertarianism is untried, and that the benefits it claims it would produce have not been put to the test. Others would maintain that libertarianism is inherently unworkable in the real world, because, human nature being what it is, whatever organization was strong enough to enforce contracts and prohibit fraud would seize power and become a de facto government.
In the United States, polls (circa 2006) found that the views and voting habits of between 10% and 20%, or more, of voting age Americans might be classified as "] and ], or ]".<ref name="Libertarian Vote"/><ref name="Anes 2004"/> This was based on pollsters' and researchers' defining libertarian views as fiscally conservative and socially liberal (based on the common United States meanings of the terms) and against government intervention in economic affairs and for expansion of personal freedoms.<ref name="Libertarian Vote"/> In a 2015 Gallup poll, this figure had risen to 27%.<ref name="Gallup 2015"/> A 2015 Reuters poll found that 23% of American voters self-identified as libertarians, including 32% in the 18–29 age group.<ref name="Reuters 2015"/> Through twenty polls on this topic spanning thirteen years, Gallup found that voters who are libertarian on the political spectrum ranged from 17% to 23% of the United States electorate.<ref name="Gallup 2006"/> However, a 2014 Pew Poll found that 23% of Americans who identify as libertarians have no idea what the word means. In this poll, 11% of respondents both identified as libertarians and understood what the term meant.<ref name="Pew 2014"/>


In 2001, an American ] movement, called the ], was founded to recruit at least 20,000 libertarians to move to a single low-population state (], was selected in 2003) in order to make the state a stronghold for libertarian ideas.<ref>{{cite news |last=Belluck |first=Pam |date=October 27, 2003 |title=Libertarians Pursue New Political Goal: State of Their Own |work=] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/27/us/libertarians-pursue-new-political-goal-state-of-their-own.html?pagewanted=all |access-date=May 26, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Kitch |first1=Michael |date=October 22, 2021 |title=Its founder reflects on the Free State Project |url=https://read.nhbr.com/nh-business-review/2021/10/22/#?article=3886193 |access-date=April 30, 2022 |work=]}}</ref> As of May 2022, approximately 6,232 participants have moved to New Hampshire for the Free State Project.<ref>{{cite web |title=FSP current mover count |url=https://www.fsp.org/ |access-date=1 May 2022 |website=fsp.org |publisher=Free State Project}}</ref>
== Footnotes==


] protest in Washington, D.C., September 2009]]
<references/>
2009 saw the rise of the ], an American political movement known for advocating reductions in the United States national debt and federal budget deficits by reducing government spending, as well as cutting taxes. This movement had a significant libertarian component<ref name="libertarian">{{cite web |url=http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/libertarian-roots-tea-party?mc_cid=6b9d637298&mc_eid=a1708a475b |title=Libertarian Roots of the Tea Party |last1=Kirby |first1=David |last2=Ekins |first2=Emily McClintock |publisher=] |date=6 August 2012 |journal= |access-date=7 June 2017 |archive-date=4 December 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181204005725/https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/libertarian-roots-tea-party?mc_cid=6b9d637298&mc_eid=a1708a475b |url-status=live}}</ref> despite having contrasts with libertarian values and views in some areas such as ], ], ] and ].<ref>{{cite book |title=Libertarianism What Everyone Needs to Know |last=Brennan |first=Jason |publisher=] |date=2012 |page=142 |quote=Is the Tea Party libertarian? Overall, the Tea Party movement is not libertarian, though it has many libertarian elements, and many libertarians are Tea Partiers. They share the libertarian view that DC tends to be corrupt, and that Washington often promotes special interests at the expense of the common good. However, Tea Party members are predominantly populist, nationalist, social conservatives rather than libertarians. Polls indicate that most Tea Partiers believe government should have an active role in promoting traditional "family values" or conservative Judeo-Christian values. Many of them oppose free trade and open immigration. They tend to favor less government intervention in the domestic economy but more government intervention in international trade.}}</ref> A 2011 ''Reason''-Rupe poll found that among those who self-identified as Tea Party supporters, 41 percent leaned libertarian and 59 percent ].<ref>Ekins, Emily (26 September 2011). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120511064727/http://reason.com/poll/2011/09/26/is-half-the-tea-part-libertart |date=11 May 2012 }} '']''. 26 September 2011.</ref> Named after the ], it also contained ] elements.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123137382 |first=Liz |last=Halloran |title=What's Behind The New Populism? |publisher=] |date=5 February 2010 |access-date=4 April 2018 |archive-date=29 July 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180729230703/https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123137382 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/us/politics/16teaparty.html |title=Tea Party Lights Fuse for Rebellion on Right |work=] |date=16 February 2010 |first=David |last=Barstow |access-date=19 February 2017 |archive-date=2 March 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170302180744/http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/us/politics/16teaparty.html |url-status=live}}</ref> By 2016, '']'' noted that the Tea Party movement was essentially completely dead; however, the article noted that the movement seemed to die in part because some of its ideas had been absorbed by the mainstream Republican Party.<ref>{{cite web |title=How We Killed the Tea Party |url=https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/08/tea-party-pacs-ideas-death-214164 |website=]|date=14 August 2016 }}</ref>


In 2012, anti-war and pro-] presidential candidates such as Libertarian Republican Ron Paul and Libertarian Party candidate ] raised millions of dollars and garnered millions of votes despite opposition to their obtaining ballot access by both Democrats and Republicans.<ref>Raimondo, Justin (6 November 2012). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130112211817/http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2012/11/06/election-2012-ron-pauls-revenge/ |date=12 January 2013 }} ]. Retrieved 7 November 2012.</ref> The ] saw Johnson and ] being nominated as the 2012 presidential ticket for the Libertarian Party, resulting in the most successful result for a third-party presidential candidacy since 2000 and the best in the Libertarian Party's history by vote number. Johnson received 1% of the popular vote, amounting to more than 1.2 million votes.<ref name="million">{{cite web|url=http://reason.com/blog/2012/11/07/gary-johnson-pulls-one-million-votes-one|title=Gary Johnson Pulls One Million Votes, One Percent|work=]|date=7 November 2012|access-date=7 November 2012|author=Tuccile, J.D.|archive-date=9 November 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121109061252/http://reason.com/blog/2012/11/07/gary-johnson-pulls-one-million-votes-one|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2012/11/08/Libertarian-Party-buoyant-Greens-hopeful/UPI-46151352363400/|title=Libertarian Party buoyant; Greens hopeful|work=United Press International|access-date=9 November 2012|archive-date=18 February 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130218223524/http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2012/11/08/Libertarian-Party-buoyant-Greens-hopeful/UPI-46151352363400|url-status=live}}</ref> Johnson has expressed a desire to win at least 5 percent of the vote so that the Libertarian Party candidates could get equal ] and ], thus subsequently ending the ].<ref>{{cite news|author=Karoun Demirjian|url=http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/oct/05/libertarian-candidate-makes-push-nevadas-ron-paul-/|title=Libertarian candidate makes push for Nevada's Ron Paul supporters|newspaper=Las Vegas Sun|date=5 October 2012|access-date=2 November 2012|archive-date=28 October 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121028015413/http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/oct/05/libertarian-candidate-makes-push-nevadas-ron-paul-/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Why 5% matters to Gary Johnson|url=http://ivn.us/2012/11/01/why-5-matters-to-gary-johnson/|author=Lucas Eaves|date=1 November 2012|publisher=Independent Voter Network|access-date=6 November 2012|archive-date=18 June 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130618034013/http://ivn.us/2012/11/01/why-5-matters-to-gary-johnson/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>Texas Politics Today, 2013–2014 Edition – p. 121, William Maxwell, Ernest Crain, Adolfo Santos – 2013.</ref> The ] saw Johnson and ] nominated as the 2016 presidential ticket and resulted in the most successful result for a third-party presidential candidacy since 1996 and the best in the Libertarian Party's history by vote number. Johnson received 3% of the popular vote, amounting to more than 4.3 million votes.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://transition.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2016/federalelections2016.pdf|title=Official 2016 Presidential General Election Results|publisher=Federal Election Commission|date=December 2017|access-date=30 December 2019|archive-date=27 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190427072618/https://transition.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2016/federalelections2016.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Following the ], the ], a ] faction, became the dominant faction on the Libertarian National Committee.<ref>{{cite web |last=Doherty |first=Brian |date=2022-05-29 |title=Mises Caucus Takes Control of Libertarian Party |url=https://reason.com/2022/05/29/mises-caucus-takes-control-of-libertarian-party/ |access-date=2022-06-07 |website=] |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Mas |first=Frederic |date=2022-06-01 |title=United States: the libertarian party veers to the right |url=https://www.contrepoints.org/2022/06/01/431241-etats-unis-le-parti-libertarien-vire-a-droite |access-date=2022-06-07 |website=] |language=fr-FR}}</ref> Right-wing libertarian ideals are also prominent in far-right ] associated with extremist anti-government ideas.<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2015 |isbn=978-0191667824 |editor-last=della Porta |editor-first=Donatella |page=527 |quote= these militia organizations often revived long-since discarded state militia insignia and organization names while simultaneously aligning them with contemporary far-right libertarian politics (Crothers 2004). |editor-last2=Diani |editor-first2=Mario}}</ref>
== See also ==
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]


] economist ] made the distinction between being part of the American ] and "a libertarian with a small 'l'", where he held libertarian values but belonged to the American ].<ref>{{cite web |title=''Friedman and Freedom'' |url=http://queensjournal.ca/article.php?point=vol129/issue37/features/lead1 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060811115145/http://queensjournal.ca/article.php?point=vol129%2Fissue37%2Ffeatures%2Flead1 |archive-date=August 11, 2006 |access-date=February 20, 2008 |publisher=Queen's Journal}}, Interview with Peter Jaworski. ''The Journal'', Queen's University, March 15, 2002 – Issue 37, Volume 129</ref>
==References==
* ], "". February 17, 2003. Accessed 30 June, 2005.
* Brooke Shelbey Biggs, "", '']'', 21 July 1997.
* ], "A Note on Labels: Why "Libertarian"?", accessed June 21, 2005
* Cleveland, Paul and Stevenson, Brian. ''Individual Responsibility and Economic Well-Being. The Freeman,'' August 1995.
* Cubeddu, Raimondo. Preface of Etica & Politica Vol. V, No. 2, 2003.
* Franzen, Don ''Los Angeles Times Book Review Desk'', review of "Neither Left Nor Right". January 19, 1997. Franzen states that "Murray and Boaz share the political philosophy of libertarianism, which upholds individual liberty--both economic and personal--and advocates a government limited, with few exceptions, to protecting individual rights and restraining the use of force and fraud." (). MSN '']''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s defines it as a "political philosophy" (Both references retrieved June 24, 2005). The ''Encyclopedia Britannica'' defines Libertarianism as "Political philosophy that stresses personal liberty." (, accessed 29 June, 2005)
* ]. ''The Bill of Rights: What It Is, What It Means, and How It's Been Misused''
* Friedman, Jeffrey. ''What's Wrong With Libertarianism, Critical Review'' Vol. 11, No. 3. Summer ] (large PDF file)
* Friedman, Milton. ''The Drug War as a Socialist Enterprise''. From: Friedman & Szasz on Liberty and Drugs, edited and with a Preface by Arnold S. Trebach and Kevin B. Zeese. Washington, D.C.: The Drug Policy Foundation, 1992.
* Gillespie, Nick. ''Rand Redux,'' ''Reason'' magazine, ]
* Goldberg, Jonah. ''Freedom Kills. ], December 12, 2001.
* Harwood, Sterling, ed., ''Business as Ethical and Business as Usual'', (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, Co.), 582pp.
* Hayek, F.A. ''Why I am not a Conservative'', ] Press, ]
* Hospers, John, ''Libertarianism'' (Santa Barbara, CA: Reason Press, 1971).
* Hospers, John, "Arguments for Libertarianism," in Sterling Harwood, ed., Business as Ethical and Business as Usual (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1996), pp. 47-57.
* Huben, Michael, ''A Non-Libertarian FAQ'', ], ]
* Kangas, Steve. ''Chile: the Laboratory Test.'' '']'',''
* LaFollette, Hugh. ''"Why Libertarianism is Mistaken",'' in Sterling Harwood, ed., Business as Ethical and Business as Usual (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1996), pp. 58-66.
* Levy, Jacob. ''SELF-CRITICISM'', ], ], ]
* Machan, Tibor R. ''Revisiting Anarchism and Government,'' .
* Madison, James. Federalist Papers #10. ''Daily Advertiser,'' November 22, 1787
* Nelson, Quee, "Quotations Concerning Libertarianism (Often Called Classical Liberalism)," in Sterling Harwood, ed., Business as Ethical and Business as Usual (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1996), p. 67.
* Nettlau, Max. ''A Short History of Anarchism,'' ]. p. 75
* Partridge, Ernest. "With Liberty and Justice for Some." ''Environmental Philosophy'' edited by ], ], ], ], and ], 2004.
* Rand, Ayn. ''Ayn Rand’s Q&A on Libertarians'' from a ] interview
* Rockwell, Lew and Friedman, Milton. "Friedman v. Rockwell." ''Chronicles,'' December 1998.
* Sanchez, Julian. "The Other Guevara." '']'' magazine, August 12, ].
* Yglesias, Matthew. "Health is Forever". ], ].
* Young, Cathy. ''Ayn Rand at 100,'' '']'' magazine. ]
* ] website. "The World's Smallest Political Quiz".
* ''The Capitalism Tour. ]''.
* ] website. "Russell Means&mdash;Libertarian"
* ''Libertarian Party News. Murray Rothbard: 1926-1995'', February 1995.


=== Contemporary libertarianism in the United Kingdom ===
The best egalitarian critique of libertarianism by a political philosopher is G.A. Cohen, ''Self-ownership, freedom and equality'' (CUP 1995).
{{Main|Libertarianism in the United Kingdom}}


=== Contemporary libertarianism in South Africa ===
== External links ==
{{Main|Libertarianism in South Africa}}
=== Libertarian political parties around the world===
* of the ]
* of the ]
* of ] (])
* of ] (])
* of ], a self-described classical liberal party in New Zealand that is also sometimes described as libertarian
* of the ]
* of the ]
* of ] (Russian Libertarian Movement)
* of the ]
* of the ]
* of the ]
* of the ]
* of the ]
* of ] in Spanish: Resistencia Civil (])
* of the ] (])
* of the United Civil Party of ]
* of the ] Party of ]
* of Det Liberale Folkepartiet of ]


=== Libertarian ]s === === Contemporary libertarianism in Argentina ===
{{Main|Libertarianism in Argentina}}
* of the ]
Contemporary libertarianism in ] has gained significant prominence, particularly with the rise of ] and his ] coalition. The ], founded in 2018, initially attracted young intellectuals and has since evolved into a major political force. Milei, a self-described "liberal libertarian," became the face of this movement, transforming it from an academic discourse into a powerful political phenomenon that culminated in his victory in the ].<ref name="Argentina">{{cite web|url=https://www.cato.org/blog/javier-milei-cato-conference-im-liberal-libertarian-i-dont-believe-politicians-are-gods|title=Javier Milei at Cato Conference: “I’m a Liberal Libertarian … I Don’t Believe Politicians Are Gods”|publisher=]|date=27 September 2024|access-date=31 December 2024}}</ref>
* of the ]
* of the ]
* of the ]
* of the ] (British)
* of the ]
* of the ] - see their
* of the ](Current News)
* ] Romanian libertarian think tank
* of the ]
* of the ]
* of the ]
* of the ]
* of the ]
* of the ] (] economics)
* of the ]
* of ]
* of the ] (Australia)
* of the ] (Denmark)
* of the ]
* of ] (Switzerland)
*
* of ]
* of Московский Либертариум - Moscow Libertarium (Russia)
* of Instituto Libertario (Costa Rica)
* of the Hayek Institute (Belgium/France)


Milei's libertarian platform represents a radical departure from traditional Argentine politics. His economic proposals included substantial government spending reduction, elimination of numerous federal agencies, and promoting currency competition through free market mechanisms. The intellectual foundations of Milei's libertarianism draw from classical liberal thinkers like Milton Friedman and ], emphasizing individual economic freedom and minimal state intervention.<ref name="Argentina"/>
=== Other libertarian political projects ===
* of the ]
* ]
* of the ]
* of the ]
* a libertarian project terminated in 1994
* of
*
* of ] "Beloved Freedom" - French libertarian activist association
*
*


== Contemporary libertarian organizations ==
=== Publications and Websites about Libertarianism ===
{{category see also|Anarchist organizations|Libertarian parties|Libertarian publications|Libertarian think tanks}}
* ], ''Libertarianism'' (Nash Publishing, 1971).
* blog]
* Junk, a
* ] a Libertarian website for teenagers.
* From Al Barger's US Senate campaign website
* - left libertarian text archive
* by ]
*
*
*
* of the ]
* of ]
* of ]
* of The ] of Liberty
* of '']''
* of '']''
* of '']
* for ]
* of ]
* Richard Wall, August 17, 2004. LewRockwell.com
* of ]
* of '']'' magazine (a libertarian magazine)
* of '']'' newspaper (a left-leaning libertarian newspaper)
* of the '']''
*
* of ] (libertarian radio show)
* Talk Show with important guests
* Italian libertarian/anarcho-capitalist site
* A journal of ] thought
* of UK based ]
* of ]
* of ]
* Rebellion Coffee Co.
* (Danish)
* News & views for Anarchists & Activists.
* The Anarcho-Libertarian Utopia — A Critique, By Drieu Godefridi (Hayek Institute).
* ], Dr. Sterling Harwood's Homepage, www.sterlingharwood.com
*
*
*


Major libertarian organizations in the United States include the ], the ], the ], the ], ], the ], the ], and the ]. Since the 1950s, many American libertarian organizations have adopted a free-market stance as well as supporting civil liberties and non-interventionist foreign policies.
===Sites about libertarianism===
*
*
*
*
*
* by J. C. Lester
*
* Huben, Michael


The activist ], formed in 2001, is working to entice 20,000 libertarians to New Hampshire to influence state policy.<ref>{{cite news|title=Libertarians Pursue New Political Goal: State of Their Own|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/27/us/libertarians-pursue-new-political-goal-state-of-their-own.html|first=Pam|last=Belluck|work=The New York Times|date=27 October 2003|access-date=26 May 2011|archive-date=13 January 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220113104541/https://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/27/us/libertarians-pursue-new-political-goal-state-of-their-own.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
{{featured article}}


Libertarian organizations founded outside the United States include the ] in Switzerland, and the ] in Guatemala.
]
]
]


Active libertarian student organizations include ] and ]. Students for Liberty was founded in the United States in 2007, but as of 2014 had over 1000 chapters across North America and worldwide, including in Europe, Asia, Africa, and South America.
]

]
A number of countries have ] that run candidates for political office. The first ] was formed in the United States in 1971 and has grown to become the third largest<ref>{{cite news|author=Elizabeth Hovde|url=http://www.oregonlive.com/hovde/index.ssf/2009/05/americans_mixed_on_obamas_big.html|title=Americans mixed on Obama's big government gamble|newspaper=The Oregonian|date=11 May 2009|access-date=6 September 2010|archive-date=21 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181021232234/https://www.oregonlive.com/hovde/index.ssf/2009/05/americans_mixed_on_obamas_big.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Gairdner|first=William D.|title=The Trouble with Canada: A Citizen Speaks Out|publisher=BPS Books|location=Toronto|year=2007|orig-date=1990|isbn=978-0978440220|pages=101–102|quote=The first, we would call "libertarianism" today. Libertarians wanted to get ''all'' government out of people's lives. This movement is still very much alive today. In fact, in the United States, it is the third largest political party, and ran 125 candidates during the U.S. election of 1988.}}</ref> and leading alternative American political party. As of (date?) it had a reported 511,277 voters (0.46% of total electorate) registered as Libertarian in the 31 states that report Libertarian registration statistics and ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ballot-access.org/2017/09/03/august-2017-ballot-access-news-print-edition/|title=August 2017 Ballot Access News Print Edition|website=ballot-access.org|date=3 September 2017 |access-date=23 March 2019|archive-date=7 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210107212314/http://ballot-access.org/2017/09/03/august-2017-ballot-access-news-print-edition/|url-status=live}}</ref>
]

]
== Criticism ==
]
{{main|Criticism of libertarianism}}
]
Criticism of libertarianism includes ethical, economic, environmental, pragmatic and philosophical concerns. These concerns are most commonly voiced by critics on the left and directed against the more right-leaning schools of libertarian thought. <ref>''Multiple citations:''
]
*Friedman, Jeffrey (1993). "What's Wrong with Libertarianism". ''Critical Review''. 11 (3). p. 427.
]
*Sterba, James P. (October 1994). "From Liberty to Welfare". ''Ethics''. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell. '''105''' (1): 237–241.
]
*Partridge, Ernest (2004). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190821162653/http://gadfly.igc.org/papers/liberty.htm |date=21 August 2019 }}. In Zimmerman, Michael; Callicott, Baird; Warren, Karen; Klaver, Irene; Clark, John. ''Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology'' (4th ed.). Pearson. {{ISBN|978-0131126954}}.
]
*{{cite web|url=http://www.virginialawreview.org/content/pdfs/92/1605.pdf|title=Libertarianism, Utility, and Economic Competition|last=Wolff|first=Jonathan|date=22 October 2006|publisher=Virginia Law Review|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130112210848/http://www.virginialawreview.org/content/pdfs/92/1605.pdf|archive-date=12 January 2013|access-date=10 February 2020}}
]
*{{cite web|url=https://www.demos.org/blog/10/28/13/libertarians-are-huge-fans-economic-coercion|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190218082051/https://www.demos.org/blog/10/28/13/libertarians-are-huge-fans-economic-coercion|title=Libertarians Are Huge Fans of Economic Coercion|last=Bruenig|first=Matt|publisher=]|date=28 October 2013|archive-date=18 February 2019|access-date=19 August 2016}}
]
*{{cite web|url=http://www.demos.org/blog/11/17/13/libertarians-are-huge-fans-initiating-force|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181215065938/https://www.demos.org/blog/11/17/13/libertarians-are-huge-fans-initiating-force|title=Libertarians are Huge Fans of Initiating Force|last=Bruenig|first=Matt|publisher=]|date=17 November 2013|archive-date=15 December 2018|access-date=19 August 2016}}</ref> One such argument is the view that it has no explicit theory of liberty.<ref name="Lester"/> It has also been argued that '']'' ] does not necessarily produce the best or most efficient outcome,<ref>{{cite book|title=The Progressive Assault on Laissez Faire: Robert Hale and the First Law and Economics Movement|last=Fried|first=Barbara|publisher=Harvard University Press|year=2009|page=50|isbn=978-0674037304}}</ref><ref>Liu, Eric; Hanauer, Nick (7 May 2016). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180426011950/http://evonomics.com/complexity-economics-shows-us-that-laissez-faire-fail-nickhanauer/ |date=26 April 2018 }}. Evonomics. Retrieved 10 February 2020.</ref> nor does its philosophy of ] and policies of ] prevent the ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Peak Oil: Apocalyptic Environmentalism and Libertarian Political Culture|last=Matthew|first=Schneider-Mayerson|isbn=978-0226285573|location=Chicago|oclc=922640625|date=14 October 2015}}</ref>
]

]
Critics have accused libertarianism of promoting "atomistic" individualism that ignores the role of groups and communities in shaping an individual's identity.<ref name="Boaz" /> Libertarians have responded by denying that they promote this form of individualism, arguing that recognition and protection of individualism does not mean the rejection of community living.<ref name="Boaz" /> Libertarians also argue that they are simply against individuals' being forced to have ties with communities and that individuals should be allowed to sever ties with communities they dislike and form new communities instead.<ref name="Boaz" />
]

]
Critics such as ] describe this type of libertarianism as fundamentally a ] ] ideology united with more ] thought and goals by a desire to enforce hierarchical power and social relations.<ref name="Robin" /> Similarly, ] has argued that libertarianism is a ] ideology that has stood against democracy. According to MacLean, libertarian-leaning ] and ] have used anonymous, ] campaign contributions, a network of libertarian institutes and lobbying for the appointment of libertarian, pro-business judges to United States federal and state courts to oppose taxes, public education, employee protection laws, environmental protection laws and the ] ] program.<ref>{{cite book|last=MacLean|first=Nancy|title=Democracy in Chains, The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America|year=2017|publisher=Penguin Books|isbn=978-1101980965}}</ref>

Conservative philosopher ] argued that libertarians "bear no authority, temporal or spiritual" and do not "venerate ancient beliefs and customs, or the natural world, or country, or the immortal spark in fellow men".<ref name="Boaz" /> Libertarians have responded by saying that they do venerate these ancient traditions, but are against the law's being used to force individuals to follow them.<ref name="Boaz" />

== See also ==
{{Portal|Anarchism|Libertarianism|Politics}}
{{cols|colwidth=12em}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* "]"
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* "]"
* ]
{{colend}}

== References ==
{{reflist}}

== Bibliography ==
{{refbegin}}
* Attas, Daniel (2010). "Libertarianism". In Bevir, Mark. ''Encyclopedia of Political Theory''. Thousand Oaks, CA: ]. pp.&nbsp;810–818. {{ISBN|978-1412958653}}.
* Carlson, Jennifer D. (2012). "Libertarianism". In Miller, Wilburn R., ed. ''The Social History of Crime and Punishment in America''. London: SAGE Publications. {{ISBN|978-1412988766}}.
* ] (2007). ''Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement''. PublicAffairs.
* ] (2005). '']''. Montréal: Black Rose Books. {{ISBN|1551642506}}.
* Guérin, Daniel (1970). ''Anarchism: From Theory to Practice''. New York: Monthly Review Press. {{ISBN|978-0853451754}}.
* {{cite book |last=Hahnel |first=Robin |author-link=Robin Hahnel |year=2005 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CI5d2CpL60oC |title=Economic Justice and Democracy: From Competition to Cooperation |chapter=Libertarian Socialism: What Went Wrong? |location=] |publisher=] |isbn=0-415-93344-7 |via=]}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Hamowy |first1=Ronald |editor-first=Ronald |editor-last=Hamowy |editor-link=Ronald Hamowy |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism |title=General Introduction |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC |year=2008 |publisher=]; ] |location=Thousand Oaks, CA |doi=10.4135/9781412965811 |isbn=978-1412965804 |oclc=750831024 |lccn=2008009151 |pages=xxv–xxxvii |access-date=31 October 2015 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930070314/https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC |url-status=live}}
* Hospers, John (1971). ''Libertarianism''. Santa Barbara, CA: Reason Press.
* Hunt, E. K. (2003). ''Property and Prophets: the Evolution of Economic Institutions and Ideologies''. New York: M. E. Sharpe, Inc. {{ISBN|0765606089}}.
* Kinna, Ruth (2010). "Anarchism". In Bevir, Mark. ''Encyclopedia of Political Theory''. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. pp.&nbsp;34–37. {{ISBN|978-1412958653}}.
* Marshall, Peter (2009). '']''. Oakland, CA: PM Press. {{ISBN|978-1604860641}}.
* McLaughlin, Paul (2007). ''Anarchism and Authority: A Philosophical Introduction to Classical Anarchism''. AshGate.
* Miller, David; Coleman, Janet; Connolly, William; Ryan, Alan (1991). ''The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought''. Wiley-Blackwell. {{ISBN|978-0631179443}}.
* {{Cite book |last1=Pinta |first1=Saku |last2=Kinna |first2=Ruth |last3=Prichard |first3=Alex |last4=Berry |first4=David |chapter=Preface |editor-last=Prichard |editor-first=Alex |editor-last2=Kinna |editor-first2=Ruth |editor-last3=Pinta |editor-first3=Saku |editor-last4=Berry |editor-first4=David |year=2017 |title=Libertarian Socialism: Politics in Black and Red |edition=2nd |location=] |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-62963-390-9 |lccn=2016959590}}
* Richardson, James L. (2001). ''Contending Liberalisms in World Politics: Ideology and Power''. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers. {{ISBN|155587939X}}.
* Ward, Colin (2004). ''Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction''. Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|978-0192804778}}.
* Woodcock, George (2004). ''Anarchism''. University of Toronto Press. {{ISBN|978-1551116297}}.
* Bejan, Adrian (2020), Freedom and Evolution, Springer Nature. {{ISBN|978-3-030-34008-7}}.
* Bejan, Adrian (2016), The Physics of Life, St. Martin's Press. {{ISBN|978-1-250-07882-7}}{{refend}}

== External links ==
{{sister project links}}
* . '']''.
* {{cite IEP|url-id=libertar|title=Libertarianism}}
* {{SEP|libertarianism|Libertarianism|Bas van der Vossen|January 28, 2019}}
<!-- Please read ] before adding a link. -->

{{libertarianism}}
{{navboxes
|list=
{{anarchism}}
{{liberalism}}
{{libertarian socialism navbox}}
{{political ideologies}}
{{political philosophy}}
{{world view}}
}}
{{authority control}}

]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 23:27, 9 January 2025

Political philosophy based on liberty For other uses, see Libertarianism (disambiguation). "Libertarians" redirects here. For political parties, see List of libertarian political parties. Not to be confused with Liberalism.

Part of a series on
Libertarianism
Concepts
Issues
Philosophers
Politicians
National variants
Historical background
Related topics

Libertarianism (from French: libertaire, itself from the Latin: libertas, lit.'freedom') is a political philosophy that holds freedom and liberty as primary values. Many libertarians conceive of freedom in accord with the Non-Aggression Principle, according to which each individual has the right to live as they choose, so long as it does not involve violating the rights of others by initiating force or fraud against them.

Libertarians advocate for the expansion of individual autonomy and political self-determination, emphasizing the principles of equality before the law and the protection of civil rights, including the rights to freedom of association, freedom of speech, freedom of thought and freedom of choice. They generally support individual liberty and oppose authority, state power, warfare, militarism and nationalism, but some libertarians diverge on the scope and nature of their opposition to existing economic and political systems.

Schools of libertarian thought offer a range of views regarding the legitimate functions of state and non-state power. Different categorizations have been used to distinguish these various forms of libertarianism. Scholars have identified distinct libertarian perspectives on the nature of property and capital, typically delineating them along left–right or socialistcapitalist axes. Libertarianism has been broadly shaped by liberal ideas.

Origins of political libertarianism

In the mid-19th century, libertarianism originated as a form of anti-authoritarian and anti-state politics usually seen as being on the left (like socialists and anarchists especially social anarchists, but more generally libertarian communists/Marxists and libertarian socialists). Along with seeking to abolish or reduce the power of the State, these libertarians sought to abolish capitalism and private ownership of the means of production, or else to restrict their purview or effects to usufruct property norms, in favor of common or cooperative ownership and management, viewing private property in the means of production as a barrier to freedom and liberty.

Growth of the libertarian movement

In the mid-20th century, American proponents of anarcho-capitalism and minarchism began using the term libertarian. Minarchists advocate for night-watchman states which maintain only those functions of government necessary to safeguard natural rights, understood in terms of self-ownership or autonomy, while anarcho-capitalists advocate for the replacement of all state institutions with private alternatives.

During this time period, the term "libertarian" became used by growing numbers of people to advocate laissez-faire capitalism and strong private property rights such as in land, infrastructure and natural resources. This libertarianism, a revival of classical liberalism in the United States, occurred due to other American liberals abandoning classical liberalism and embracing progressivism and economic interventionism in the early 20th century after the Great Depression and with the New Deal.

Since the 1970s, this classical liberal form of libertarianism has spread beyond the United States, with libertarian or right-libertarian parties being established in the United Kingdom, Israel, South Africa, Argentina, and many other countries.

After the fall of the Soviet Union, which caused many people to give up on Marxism or state socialism, libertarian socialism also grew in popularity and influence, alongside left-wing anti-war, anti-capitalist and anti- and alter-globalisation movements.

In 2022, former student activist and self-described libertarian socialist Gabriel Boric became head of state of Chile after winning the 2021 Chilean presidential election with the Apruebo Dignidad coalition.

In November 2023, economist and television commentator Javier Milei was elected as the world's first self-identified Libertarian head of state after winning an upset landslide in that year's general election as the leader of the libertarian La Libertad Avanza coalition.

Overview

Etymology

17 August 1860 edition of Le Libertaire, Journal du mouvement social, a libertarian communist publication in New York City

The first recorded use of the term libertarian was in 1789, when William Belsham wrote about libertarianism in the context of metaphysics. As early as 1796, libertarian came to mean an advocate or defender of liberty, in the sense of a supporter of republicanism, when the London Packet printed on 12 February the following: "Lately marched out of the Prison at Bristol, 450 of the French Libertarians". It was again used in a republican sense in 1802 in a short piece critiquing a poem by "the author of Gebir" and has since been used politically.

The use of the term libertarian to describe a new set of political positions has been traced to the French cognate libertaire, coined in a letter French libertarian communist Joseph Déjacque wrote to mutualist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon in 1857. Déjacque also used the term for his anarchist publication Le Libertaire, Journal du mouvement social (Libertarian: Journal of Social Movement) which was printed from 9 June 1858 to 4 February 1861 in New York City. Sébastien Faure, another French libertarian communist, began publishing a new Le Libertaire in the mid-1890s while France's Third Republic enacted the so-called villainous laws (lois scélérates) which banned anarchist publications in France. Libertarianism has frequently been used to refer to anarchism and libertarian socialism.

In the United States, the term libertarian was popularized by the individualist anarchist Benjamin Tucker around the late 1870s and early 1880s. Libertarianism as a synonym for liberalism was popularized in May 1955 by writer Dean Russell, a colleague of Leonard Read and a classical liberal himself. Russell justified the choice of the term as follows:

Many of us call ourselves "liberals." And it is true that the word "liberal" once described persons who respected the individual and feared the use of mass compulsions. But the leftists have now corrupted that once-proud term to identify themselves and their program of more government ownership of property and more controls over persons. As a result, those of us who believe in freedom must explain that when we call ourselves liberals, we mean liberals in the uncorrupted classical sense. At best, this is awkward and subject to misunderstanding. Here is a suggestion: Let those of us who love liberty trade-mark and reserve for our own use the good and honorable word "libertarian."

Subsequently, many Americans with classical liberal beliefs began to describe themselves as libertarians. One person who popularized the term libertarian in this sense was Murray Rothbard, who began publishing libertarian works in the 1960s. Rothbard described this modern use of the words overtly as a "capture" from his enemies, writing that "for the first time in my memory, we, 'our side,' had captured a crucial word from the enemy. 'Libertarians' had long been simply a polite word for left-wing anarchists, that is for anti-private property anarchists, either of the communist or syndicalist variety. But now we had taken it over".

In the 1970s, Robert Nozick was responsible for popularizing this usage of the term in academic and philosophical circles outside the United States, especially with the publication of Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974), a response to social liberal John Rawls's A Theory of Justice (1971). In the book, Nozick proposed a minimal state on the grounds that it was an inevitable phenomenon which could arise without violating individual rights.

According to common United States meanings of conservative and liberal, libertarianism in the United States has been described as conservative on economic issues (economic liberalism and fiscal conservatism) and liberal on personal freedom (civil libertarianism and cultural liberalism). It is also often associated with a foreign policy of non-interventionism.

Definitions

The Political Compass: the green quadrant represents left-libertarianism and the purple right-libertarianism
Main article: Definition of anarchism and libertarianism

Although libertarianism originated as a form of anarchist or left-wing politics, the development in the mid-20th century of modern libertarianism in the United States resulted in libertarianism's being commonly associated with right-wing politics, as well as viewed by many as neither left- nor right-wing, but an independent pro-freedom and anti-authoritarian philosophy. It also resulted in several authors and political scientists using two or more categorizations to distinguish libertarian views on the nature of property and capital, usually along left–right or socialist–capitalist lines.

While all libertarians support some level of individual rights, left-libertarians differ by supporting an egalitarian redistribution of natural resources. Left-libertarian ideologies include anarchist schools of thought, alongside many other anti-paternalist and New Left schools of thought centered around economic egalitarianism as well as geolibertarianism, green politics, market-oriented left-libertarianism and the Steiner–Vallentyne school. Some variants of libertarianism, such as anarcho-capitalism, have been labeled as far-right or radical right by some scholars.

Those sometimes called "right-libertarians", usually by leftists or by other libertarians with more left-leaning ideologies, often reject the label due to its association with conservatism and right-wing politics and simply describe themselves as libertarians. However, some, particularly those who describe themselves as paleo-libertarians, agree with their placement on the political right. Meanwhile, some proponents of free-market anti-capitalism in the United States consciously label themselves as left-libertarians and see themselves as part of a broad libertarian left.

While the term libertarian had been substantially synonymous with anarchism and seen by many as part of the left, continuing today as part of the libertarian left in opposition to the moderate left such as social democracy or authoritarian and statist socialism, its meaning has evolved during the past half century, with broader adoption by ideologically disparate groups, including some viewed as right-wing by older users of the term. As a term, libertarian can include both the New Left Marxists (who do not associate with a vanguard party) and extreme liberals (primarily concerned with civil liberties) or civil libertarians. Additionally, some libertarians use the term libertarian socialist to avoid anarchism's negative connotations and emphasize its connections with socialism.

The revival of free-market ideologies during the mid-to-late 20th century came with disagreement over what to call the movement. While many believers in economic freedom prefer the term libertarian, some free-market conservatives reject the term's association with the 1960s New Left and its connotations of libertine hedonism. The movement is divided over the use of conservatism as an alternative. Those who seek both economic and social liberty would be known as liberals, but that term developed associations opposite of the limited government, low-taxation, minimal state advocated by the movement. Name variants of the free-market revival movement include classical liberalism, economic liberalism, free-market liberalism and neoliberalism. As a term, libertarian or economic libertarian has the most everyday acceptance to describe a member of the movement, with the latter term being based on both the ideology's importance of economics and its distinction from libertarians of the New Left.

A diagram of the typology of beliefs in libertarianism (both left and right, respectively)

While both historical and contemporary libertarianism share general antipathy towards power by government authority, the latter exempts power wielded through free-market capitalism. Historically, libertarians, including Herbert Spencer and Max Stirner, supported the protection of an individual's freedom from powers of government and private ownership. In contrast, while condemning governmental encroachment on personal liberties, modern American libertarians support freedoms based on their agreement with private property rights. The abolition or privatization of amenities or entitlements controlled by the government is a common theme in modern American libertarian writings.

According to modern American libertarian Walter Block, left-libertarians and right-libertarians agree with certain libertarian premises, but "where differ is in terms of the logical implications of these founding axioms". Although several modern American libertarians reject the political spectrum, especially the left–right political spectrum, several strands of libertarianism in the United States and right-libertarianism have been described as being right-wing, New Right or radical right and reactionary. While some American libertarians such as Walter Block, Harry Browne, Tibor Machan, Justin Raimondo, Leonard Read and Murray Rothbard deny any association with either the left or right, other American libertarians such as Kevin Carson, Karl Hess, and Roderick T. Long have written about libertarianism's left-wing opposition to authoritarian rule and argued that libertarianism is fundamentally a left-wing position. Rothbard himself previously made the same point.

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines libertarianism as the moral view that agents initially fully own themselves and have certain moral powers to acquire property rights in external things. Libertarian historian George Woodcock defines libertarianism as the philosophy that fundamentally doubts authority and advocates transforming society by reform or revolution. Libertarian philosopher Roderick T. Long defines libertarianism as "any political position that advocates a radical redistribution of power from the coercive state to voluntary associations of free individuals", whether "voluntary association" takes the form of the free market or of communal co-operatives. According to the Libertarian Party, of the United States, libertarianism is the advocacy of either anarchy, or government that is funded voluntarily and limited to protecting individuals from coercion and violence.

Philosophy

According to the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP), "What it means to be a 'libertarian' in a political sense is a contentious issue, especially among libertarians themselves." Nevertheless, all libertarians begin with a conception of personal autonomy from which they argue in favor of civil liberties and a reduction or elimination of the state. People described as being left-libertarian or right-libertarian generally tend to call themselves simply libertarians and refer to their philosophy as libertarianism. As a result, some political scientists and writers classify the forms of libertarianism into two or more groups to distinguish libertarian views on the nature of property and capital. In the United States, proponents of free-market anti-capitalism consciously label themselves as left-libertarians and see themselves as being part of a broad libertarian left.

Libertarianism is a "heory upholding... rights...above all else" and seeks to "reduce" the power of a state or states, especially ones a libertarian lives in or is closely associated with, to "safeguard" and maintain individualism.

Libertarians argue that some forms of order within society emerge spontaneously from the actions of many different individuals acting independently from one another without any central planning. Proposed examples of systems that evolved through spontaneous order or self-organization include the evolution of life on Earth, language, crystal structure, the Internet, Misplaced Pages, workers' councils, Horizontalidad, and a free market economy.

Libertarianism

Based on the works of European writers like John Locke, Frederic Bastiat, Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig Von Mises, it developed in the United States in the mid-20th century, and is now the most popular conception of libertarianism. Commonly referred to as a continuation or radicalization of classical liberalism, the most important of these early philosophers and economists was Robert Nozick.

While left-libertarians advocate for social freedom, right-libertarians also value social institutions that support capitalist conditions. They reject institutions that oppose this framework, arguing that such interventions unnecessarily coerce individuals and violate their economic freedom. Anarcho-capitalists seek the elimination of the state in favor of privately funded security services while minarchists defend night-watchman states which maintain only those functions of government necessary to safeguard natural rights, understood in terms of self-ownership or autonomy.

Left-libertarianism

Left-libertarianism encompasses those libertarian beliefs that claim the Earth's natural resources belong to everyone in an egalitarian manner, either unowned or owned collectively. Contemporary left-libertarians such as Hillel Steiner, Peter Vallentyne, Philippe Van Parijs, Michael Otsuka and David Ellerman believe the appropriation of land must leave "enough and as good" for others or be taxed by society to compensate for the exclusionary effects of private property. Socialist libertarians such as social and individualist anarchists, libertarian Marxists, council communists, Luxemburgists and De Leonists promote usufruct and socialist economic theories, including communism, collectivism, syndicalism and mutualism. They criticize the state for being the defender of private property and believe capitalism entails wage slavery and another form of coercion and domination related to that of the state.

There are a number of different left-libertarian positions on the state, which can range from advocating for its complete abolition to advocating for a more decentralized and limited government with social ownership of the economy. According to Sheldon Richman of the Independent Institute, other left-libertarians "prefer that corporate privileges be repealed before the regulatory restrictions on how those privileges may be exercised".

Other variants

Libertarian paternalism is a position advocated in the international bestseller Nudge by two American scholars, namely the economist Richard Thaler and the jurist Cass Sunstein. In the book Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman provides the brief summary: "Thaler and Sunstein advocate a position of libertarian paternalism, in which the state and other institutions are allowed to nudge people to make decisions that serve their own long-term interests. The designation of joining a pension plan as the default option is an example of a nudge. It is difficult to argue that anyone's freedom is diminished by being automatically enrolled in the plan, when they merely have to check a box to opt out." Nudge is considered an important piece of literature in behavioral economics.

Neo-libertarianism combines "the libertarian's moral commitment to negative liberty with a procedure that selects principles for restricting liberty on the basis of a unanimous agreement in which everyone's particular interests receive a fair hearing". Neo-libertarianism has its roots at least as far back as 1980 when it was first described by the American philosopher James Sterba of the University of Notre Dame. Sterba observed that libertarianism advocates for a government that does no more than protection against force, fraud, theft, enforcement of contracts and other so-called negative liberties as contrasted with positive liberties by Isaiah Berlin. Sterba contrasted this with the older libertarian ideal of a night watchman state or minarchism. Sterba held that it is "obviously impossible for everyone in society to be guaranteed complete liberty as defined by this ideal: after all, people's actual wants as well as their conceivable wants can come into serious conflict. t is also impossible for everyone in society to be completely free from the interference of other persons." In 2013, Sterba wrote, "I shall show that moral commitment to an ideal of 'negative' liberty, which does not lead to a night-watchman state, but instead requires sufficient government to provide each person in society with the relatively high minimum of liberty that persons using Rawls' decision procedure would select. The political program actually justified by an ideal of negative liberty I shall call Neo-Libertarianism."

Libertarian populism combines libertarian and populist politics. According to Jesse Walker, writing in the libertarian magazine Reason, libertarian populists oppose "big government" while also opposing "other large, centralized institutions" and advocate "tak an axe to the thicket of corporate subsidies, favors, and bailouts, clearing our way to an economy where businesses that can't make money serving customers don't have the option of wringing profits from the taxpayers instead".

Typology

The Nolan Chart, created by American libertarian David Nolan, expands the left–right line into a two-dimensional chart classifying the political spectrum by degrees of personal and economic freedom

In the United States, and increasingly worldwide, libertarian is a typology used to describe a political position that advocates small government and is culturally liberal and fiscally conservative in a two-dimensional political spectrum such as the libertarian-inspired Nolan Chart, where the other major typologies are conservative, liberal and populist. Libertarians support the legalization of victimless crimes such as the use of marijuana while opposing high levels of taxation and government spending on health, welfare, and education. Libertarians also support a foreign policy of non-interventionism. Libertarian was adopted in the United States, where liberal had become associated with a version that supports extensive government spending on social policies. Libertarian may also refer to an anarchist ideology that developed in the 19th century and to a liberal version that developed in the United States that is avowedly pro-capitalist.

According to polls, approximately one in four Americans self-identify as libertarian. While most members of this group are not necessarily ideologically driven, the term libertarian is commonly used to describe the form of libertarianism widely practiced in the United States and is the common meaning of the word libertarianism in the U.S. This form is often named liberalism elsewhere such as in Europe, where liberalism has a different common meaning than in the United States. In some academic circles, this form is called right-libertarianism as a complement to left-libertarianism, with acceptance of capitalism or the private ownership of land as being the distinguishing feature.

History

Liberalism

Part of a series on
Liberalism
History
Principles
Philosophers
Politicians
Organizations
Regional variants
Related topics
Schools
See also: History of liberalism
John Locke, regarded as the father of liberalism

Elements of libertarianism can be traced back to the higher-law concepts of the Greeks and the Israelites, and Christian theologians who argued for the moral worth of the individual and the division of the world into two realms, one of which is the province of God and thus beyond the power of states to control it. The right-libertarian economist Murray Rothbard suggested that Chinese Taoist philosopher Laozi was the first libertarian, likening Laozi's ideas on government to Friedrich Hayek's theory of spontaneous order. Similarly, the Cato Institute's David Boaz includes passages from the Tao Te Ching in his 1997 book The Libertarian Reader and noted in an article for the Encyclopædia Britannica that Laozi advocated for rulers to "do nothing" because "without law or compulsion, men would dwell in harmony". Libertarianism was influenced by debates within Scholasticism regarding private property and slavery. Scholastic thinkers, including Thomas Aquinas, Francisco de Vitoria, and Bartolomé de Las Casas, argued for the concept of "self-mastery" as the foundation of a system supporting individual rights.

Early Christian sects such as the Waldensians displayed libertarian attitudes. In 17th-century England, libertarian ideas began to take modern form in the writings of the Levellers and John Locke. In the middle of that century, opponents of royal power began to be called Whigs, or sometimes simply Opposition or Country, as opposed to Court writers.

During the 18th century and Age of Enlightenment, liberal ideas flourished in Europe and North America. Libertarians of various schools were influenced by liberal ideas. For philosopher Roderick T. Long, libertarians "share a common—or at least an overlapping—intellectual ancestry. claim the seventeenth century English Levellers and the eighteenth century French Encyclopedists among their ideological forebears; and usually share an admiration for Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Paine."

Thomas Paine, whose theory of property showed a libertarian concern with the unequal distribution of resources under statism

John Locke greatly influenced both libertarianism and the modern world in his writings published before and after the English Revolution of 1688, especially A Letter Concerning Toleration (1667), Two Treatises of Government (1689) and An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690). In the text of 1689, he established the basis of liberal political theory, i.e. that people's rights existed before government; that the purpose of government is to protect personal and property rights; that people may dissolve governments that do not do so; and that representative government is the best form to protect rights.

The United States Declaration of Independence was inspired by Locke in its statement: "o secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it." According to American historian Bernard Bailyn, during and after the American Revolution, "the major themes of eighteenth-century libertarianism were brought to realization" in constitutions, bills of rights, and limits on legislative and executive powers, including limits on starting wars.

According to Murray Rothbard, the libertarian creed emerged from the liberal challenges to an "absolute central State and a king ruling by divine right on top of an older, restrictive web of feudal land monopolies and urban guild controls and restrictions" as well as the mercantilism of a bureaucratic warfaring state allied with privileged merchants. The object of liberals was individual liberty in the economy, in personal freedoms and civil liberty, separation of state and religion and peace as an alternative to imperial aggrandizement. He cites Locke's contemporaries, the Levellers, who held similar views. Also influential were the English Cato's Letters during the early 1700s, reprinted eagerly by American colonists who already were free of European aristocracy and feudal land monopolies.

In January 1776, only two years after coming to America from England, Thomas Paine published his pamphlet Common Sense calling for independence for the colonies. Paine promoted liberal ideas in clear and concise language that allowed the general public to understand the debates among the political elites. Common Sense was immensely popular in disseminating these ideas, selling hundreds of thousands of copies. Paine would later write the Rights of Man and The Age of Reason and participate in the French Revolution. Paine's theory of property showed a "libertarian concern" with the unequal distribution of resources under statism.

In 1793, William Godwin wrote a libertarian philosophical treatise titled Enquiry Concerning Political Justice and its Influence on Morals and Happiness which criticized ideas of human rights and of society by contract based on vague promises. He took liberalism to its logical anarchic conclusion by rejecting all political institutions, law, government and apparatus of coercion as well as all political protest and insurrection. Instead of institutionalized justice, Godwin proposed that people influence one another to moral goodness through informal reasoned persuasion, including in the associations they joined as this would facilitate happiness.

Libertarian socialism (1857–1980s)

Part of a series on
Libertarian socialism
Political concepts
Economics
People
Philosophies and tendencies
Anarchist tendencies
Marxist tendencies
Other tendencies
History
Related topics
Main article: Libertarian socialism

Anarchist communist philosopher Joseph Déjacque was the first person to describe himself as a libertarian in an 1857 letter. Unlike mutualist anarchist philosopher Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, he argued that "it is not the product of his or her labor that the worker has a right to, but to the satisfaction of his or her needs, whatever may be their nature". According to anarchist historian Max Nettlau, the first use of the term libertarian communism was in November 1880, when a French anarchist congress employed it to identify its doctrines more clearly. The French anarchist journalist Sébastien Faure started the weekly paper Le Libertaire (The Libertarian) in 1895.

Sébastien Faure, prominent French theorist of libertarian communism as well as atheist and freethought militant

The revolutionary wave of 1917–1923 saw the active participation of anarchists in Russia and Europe. Russian anarchists participated alongside the Bolsheviks in both the February and October 1917 revolutions. However, Bolsheviks in central Russia quickly began to imprison or drive underground the libertarian anarchists. Many fled to Ukraine. After the anarchist Makhnovshchina helped stave off the White movement during the Russian Civil War, the Bolsheviks turned on the Makkhnovists and contributed to the schism between the anarcho-syndicalists and the Communists.

With the rise of fascism in Europe between the 1920s and the 1930s, anarchists began to fight fascists in Italy, in France during the February 1934 riots and in Spain where the CNT (Confederación Nacional del Trabajo) boycott of elections led to a right-wing victory and its later participation in voting in 1936 helped bring the popular front back to power. This led to a ruling class attempted coup and the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939). Gruppo Comunista Anarchico di Firenze held that during the early twentieth century, the terms libertarian communism and anarchist communism became synonymous within the international anarchist movement as a result of the close connection they had in Spain (anarchism in Spain), with libertarian communism becoming the prevalent term.

Spanish anarchist militiawomen during the 1936 Revolution

Libertarian socialism reached its apex of popularity with the Spanish Revolution of 1936, during which libertarian socialists led "the largest and most successful revolution against capitalism to ever take place in any industrial economy". During the revolution, the means of production were brought under workers' control and worker cooperatives formed the basis for the new economy. According to Gaston Leval, the CNT established an agrarian federation in the Levante that encompassed 78% of Spain's most arable land. The regional federation was populated by 1,650,000 people, 40% of whom lived on the region's 900 agrarian collectives, which were self-organised by peasant unions. Although industrial and agricultural production was at its highest in the anarchist-controlled areas of the Spanish Republic, and the anarchist militias displayed the strongest military discipline, liberals and communists alike blamed the "sectarian" libertarian socialists for the defeat of the Republic in the Spanish Civil War. These charges have been disputed by contemporary libertarian socialists, such as Robin Hahnel and Noam Chomsky, who have accused such claims of lacking substantial evidence.

During the autumn of 1931, the "Manifesto of the 30" was published by militants of the anarchist trade union CNT and among those who signed it there was the CNT General Secretary (1922–1923) Joan Peiro, Ángel Pestaña CNT (General Secretary in 1929) and Juan Lopez Sanchez. They were called treintismo and they were calling for libertarian possibilism which advocated achieving libertarian socialist ends with participation inside structures of contemporary parliamentary democracy. In 1932, they established the Syndicalist Party, which participated in the 1936 Spanish general elections and proceeded to be a part of the leftist coalition of parties known as the Popular Front obtaining two congressmen (Pestaña and Benito Pabon). In 1938, Horacio Prieto, general secretary of the CNT, proposed that the Iberian Anarchist Federation transform itself into the Libertarian Socialist Party and that it participate in the national elections.

Murray Bookchin, American libertarian socialist theorist and proponent of libertarian municipalism and communalism

The Manifesto of Libertarian Communism was written in 1953 by Georges Fontenis for the Federation Communiste Libertaire of France. It is one of the key texts of the anarchist-communist current known as platformism. In 1968, the International of Anarchist Federations was founded during an international anarchist conference in Carrara, Italy to advance libertarian solidarity. It wanted to form "a strong and organized workers movement, agreeing with the libertarian ideas". In the United States, the Libertarian League was founded in New York City in 1954 as a left-libertarian political organization building on the Libertarian Book Club. Members included Sam Dolgoff, Russell Blackwell, Dave Van Ronk, Enrico Arrigoni and Murray Bookchin.

In Australia, the Sydney Push was a predominantly left-wing intellectual subculture in Sydney from the late 1940s to the early 1970s which became associated with the label Sydney libertarianism. Well known associates of the Push include Jim Baker, John Flaus, Harry Hooton, Margaret Fink, Sasha Soldatow, Lex Banning, Eva Cox, Richard Appleton, Paddy McGuinness, David Makinson, Germaine Greer, Clive James, Robert Hughes, Frank Moorhouse and Lillian Roxon. Amongst the key intellectual figures in Push debates were philosophers David J. Ivison, George Molnar, Roelof Smilde, Darcy Waters and Jim Baker, as recorded in Baker's memoir Sydney Libertarians and the Push, published in the libertarian Broadsheet in 1975. An understanding of libertarian values and social theory can be obtained from their publications, a few of which are available online.

In 1969, French platformist anarcho-communist Daniel Guérin published an essay in 1969 called "Libertarian Marxism?" in which he dealt with the debate between Karl Marx and Mikhail Bakunin at the First International. Libertarian Marxist currents often draw from Marx and Engels' later works, specifically the Grundrisse and The Civil War in France.

Libertarianism in the United States (1943–1980s)

This article is part of a series on
Libertarianism
in the United States
Schools
Principles
History
Economics
Intellectuals
Commentators
Politicians
Issues
Culture
Organizations
Literature
See also
Main article: Libertarianism in the United States

H. L. Mencken and Albert Jay Nock were the first prominent figures in the United States to describe themselves as libertarian as synonym for liberal. They believed that Franklin D. Roosevelt had co-opted the word liberal for his New Deal policies which they opposed and used libertarian to signify their allegiance to classical liberalism, individualism and limited government.

According to David Boaz, in 1943 three women "published books that could be said to have given birth to the modern libertarian movement". Isabel Paterson's The God of the Machine, Rose Wilder Lane's The Discovery of Freedom and Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead each promoted individualism and capitalism. None of the three used the term libertarianism to describe their beliefs and Rand specifically rejected the label, criticizing the burgeoning American libertarian movement as the "hippies of the right". Rand accused libertarians of plagiarizing ideas related to her own philosophy of Objectivism and yet viciously attacking other aspects of it.

In 1946, Leonard E. Read founded the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE), an American nonprofit educational organization which promotes the principles of laissez-faire economics, private property and limited government. According to Gary North, the FEE is the "granddaddy of all libertarian organizations".

Karl Hess, a speechwriter for Barry Goldwater and primary author of the Republican Party's 1960 and 1964 platforms, became disillusioned with traditional politics following the 1964 presidential campaign in which Goldwater lost to Lyndon B. Johnson. He and his friend Murray Rothbard, an Austrian School economist, founded the journal Left and Right: A Journal of Libertarian Thought, which was published from 1965 to 1968, with George Resch and Leonard P. Liggio. In 1969, they edited The Libertarian Forum which Hess left in 1971.

The Vietnam War split the uneasy alliance between the growing numbers of American libertarians, on the one hand, and conservatives who believed in limiting liberty to uphold moral virtues on the other. Libertarians opposed to the war joined the draft resistance and peace movements as well as organizations such as Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). In 1969 and 1970, Hess joined with others, including Murray Rothbard, Robert LeFevre, Dana Rohrabacher, Samuel Edward Konkin III and former SDS leader Carl Oglesby to speak at two conferences which brought together activists from both the New Left and the Old Right in what was emerging as a nascent libertarian movement. Rothbard ultimately broke with the left, allying himself with the burgeoning paleoconservative movement. He criticized the tendency of these libertarians to appeal to "'free spirits,' to people who don't want to push other people around, and who don't want to be pushed around themselves" in contrast to "the bulk of Americans" who "might well be tight-assed conformists, who want to stamp out drugs in their vicinity, kick out people with strange dress habits, etc.". Rothbard emphasized that this was relevant as a matter of strategy as the failure to pitch the libertarian message to Middle America might result in the loss of "the tight-assed majority". This left-libertarian tradition has been carried to the present day by Konkin's agorists, contemporary mutualists such as Kevin Carson, Roderick T. Long and others such as Gary Chartier Charles W. Johnson Sheldon Richman, Chris Matthew Sciabarra and Brad Spangler.

Former congressman Ron Paul, a self-described libertarian, whose presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2012 garnered significant support from youth and libertarian Republicans

In 1971, a small group led by David Nolan formed the Libertarian Party, which has run a presidential candidate every election year since 1972. Other libertarian organizations, such as the Center for Libertarian Studies and the Cato Institute, were also formed in the 1970s. Philosopher John Hospers, a one-time member of Rand's inner circle, proposed a non-initiation of force principle to unite the movement. This statement later became a required "pledge" for members of the Libertarian Party. Hospers became the LP's first presidential candidate in 1972.

Modern libertarianism gained significant recognition in academia with the publication of Harvard University professor Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia in 1974, for which he received a National Book Award in 1975. In response to John Rawls' A Theory of Justice, Nozick's book supported a minimal state (also called a nightwatchman state by Nozick) on the grounds that the ultraminimal state arises without violating individual rights and the transition from an ultraminimal state to a minimal state is morally obligated to occur.

In the early 1970s, Rothbard wrote: "One gratifying aspect of our rise to some prominence is that, for the first time in my memory, we, 'our side,' had captured a crucial word from the enemy. 'Libertarians' had long been simply a polite word for left-wing anarchists, that is for anti-private property anarchists, either of the communist or syndicalist variety. But now we had taken it over." The project of spreading libertarian ideals in the United States has been so successful that some Americans who do not identify as libertarian seem to hold libertarian views. Since the resurgence of neoliberalism in the 1970s, this modern American libertarianism has spread beyond North America via think tanks and political parties.

In a 1975 interview with Reason, California Governor Ronald Reagan appealed to libertarians when he stated to "believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism". Libertarian Republican Ron Paul supported Reagan's 1980 presidential campaign, being one of the first elected officials in the nation to support his campaign and actively campaigned for Reagan in 1976 and 1980. However, Paul quickly became disillusioned with the Reagan administration's policies after Reagan's election in 1980 and later recalled being the only Republican to vote against Reagan budget proposals in 1981. In the 1980s, libertarians such as Paul and Rothbard criticized President Reagan, Reaganomics and policies of the Reagan administration for, among other reasons, having turned the United States' big trade deficit into debt and the United States became a debtor nation for the first time since World War I under the Reagan administration. Rothbard argued that the presidency of Reagan has been "a disaster for libertarianism in the United States" and Paul described Reagan himself as "a dramatic failure".

Contemporary libertarianism

Contemporary libertarian socialism

Members of the Spanish anarcho-syndicalist trade union Confederación Nacional del Trabajo marching in Madrid in 2010

A surge of popular interest in libertarian socialism occurred in Western nations during the 1960s and 1970s. Anarchism was influential in the counterculture of the 1960s and anarchists actively participated in the protests of 1968 which included students and workers' revolts. In 1968, the International of Anarchist Federations was founded in Carrara, Italy during an international anarchist conference held there in 1968 by the three existing European federations of France, the Italian and the Iberian Anarchist Federation as well as the Bulgarian Anarchist Federation in French exile.

Around the turn of the 21st century, libertarian socialism grew in popularity and influence as part of the anti-war, anti-capitalist and anti-globalisation movements. Anarchists became known for their involvement in protests against the meetings of the World Trade Organization (WTO), Group of Eight and the World Economic Forum. Some anarchist factions at these protests engaged in rioting, property destruction and violent confrontations with police. These actions were precipitated by ad hoc, leaderless, anonymous cadres known as black blocs and other organizational tactics pioneered in this time include security culture, affinity groups and the use of decentralized technologies such as the Internet. A significant event of this period was the confrontations at WTO conference in Seattle in 1999. For English anarchist scholar Simon Critchley, "contemporary anarchism can be seen as a powerful critique of the pseudo-libertarianism of contemporary neo-liberalism. One might say that contemporary anarchism is about responsibility, whether sexual, ecological or socio-economic; it flows from an experience of conscience about the manifold ways in which the West ravages the rest; it is an ethical outrage at the yawning inequality, impoverishment and disenfranchisment that is so palpable locally and globally". This might also have been motivated by "the collapse of 'really existing socialism' and the capitulation to neo-liberalism of Western social democracy".

Since the end of the Cold War, there have been at least two major experiments in libertarian socialism: the Zapatista uprising in Mexico, during which the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN) enabled the formation of a self-governing autonomous territory in the Mexican state of Chiapas; and the Rojava Revolution in Syria, which established the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria (AANES) as a "libertarian socialist alternative to the colonially established state boundaries in the Middle East."

In 2022, student activist and self-described libertarian socialist Gabriel Boric became head of state of Chile after winning the 2021 Chilean presidential election with the Apruebo Dignidad coalition.

Contemporary libertarianism in the United States

In the United States, polls (circa 2006) found that the views and voting habits of between 10% and 20%, or more, of voting age Americans might be classified as "fiscally conservative and socially liberal, or libertarian". This was based on pollsters' and researchers' defining libertarian views as fiscally conservative and socially liberal (based on the common United States meanings of the terms) and against government intervention in economic affairs and for expansion of personal freedoms. In a 2015 Gallup poll, this figure had risen to 27%. A 2015 Reuters poll found that 23% of American voters self-identified as libertarians, including 32% in the 18–29 age group. Through twenty polls on this topic spanning thirteen years, Gallup found that voters who are libertarian on the political spectrum ranged from 17% to 23% of the United States electorate. However, a 2014 Pew Poll found that 23% of Americans who identify as libertarians have no idea what the word means. In this poll, 11% of respondents both identified as libertarians and understood what the term meant.

In 2001, an American political migration movement, called the Free State Project, was founded to recruit at least 20,000 libertarians to move to a single low-population state (New Hampshire, was selected in 2003) in order to make the state a stronghold for libertarian ideas. As of May 2022, approximately 6,232 participants have moved to New Hampshire for the Free State Project.

Tea Party movement protest in Washington, D.C., September 2009

2009 saw the rise of the Tea Party, an American political movement known for advocating reductions in the United States national debt and federal budget deficits by reducing government spending, as well as cutting taxes. This movement had a significant libertarian component despite having contrasts with libertarian values and views in some areas such as free trade, immigration, nationalism and social issues. A 2011 Reason-Rupe poll found that among those who self-identified as Tea Party supporters, 41 percent leaned libertarian and 59 percent socially conservative. Named after the Boston Tea Party, it also contained populist elements. By 2016, Politico noted that the Tea Party movement was essentially completely dead; however, the article noted that the movement seemed to die in part because some of its ideas had been absorbed by the mainstream Republican Party.

In 2012, anti-war and pro-drug liberalization presidential candidates such as Libertarian Republican Ron Paul and Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson raised millions of dollars and garnered millions of votes despite opposition to their obtaining ballot access by both Democrats and Republicans. The 2012 Libertarian National Convention saw Johnson and Jim Gray being nominated as the 2012 presidential ticket for the Libertarian Party, resulting in the most successful result for a third-party presidential candidacy since 2000 and the best in the Libertarian Party's history by vote number. Johnson received 1% of the popular vote, amounting to more than 1.2 million votes. Johnson has expressed a desire to win at least 5 percent of the vote so that the Libertarian Party candidates could get equal ballot access and federal funding, thus subsequently ending the two-party system. The 2016 Libertarian National Convention saw Johnson and Bill Weld nominated as the 2016 presidential ticket and resulted in the most successful result for a third-party presidential candidacy since 1996 and the best in the Libertarian Party's history by vote number. Johnson received 3% of the popular vote, amounting to more than 4.3 million votes. Following the 2022 Libertarian National Convention, the Mises Caucus, a paleolibertarian faction, became the dominant faction on the Libertarian National Committee. Right-wing libertarian ideals are also prominent in far-right American militia movement associated with extremist anti-government ideas.

Chicago school of economics economist Milton Friedman made the distinction between being part of the American Libertarian Party and "a libertarian with a small 'l'", where he held libertarian values but belonged to the American Republican Party.

Contemporary libertarianism in the United Kingdom

Main article: Libertarianism in the United Kingdom

Contemporary libertarianism in South Africa

Main article: Libertarianism in South Africa

Contemporary libertarianism in Argentina

Main article: Libertarianism in Argentina

Contemporary libertarianism in Argentina has gained significant prominence, particularly with the rise of Javier Milei and his La Libertad Avanza coalition. The Libertarian Party, founded in 2018, initially attracted young intellectuals and has since evolved into a major political force. Milei, a self-described "liberal libertarian," became the face of this movement, transforming it from an academic discourse into a powerful political phenomenon that culminated in his victory in the 2023 Argentine general election.

Milei's libertarian platform represents a radical departure from traditional Argentine politics. His economic proposals included substantial government spending reduction, elimination of numerous federal agencies, and promoting currency competition through free market mechanisms. The intellectual foundations of Milei's libertarianism draw from classical liberal thinkers like Milton Friedman and Murray Rothbard, emphasizing individual economic freedom and minimal state intervention.

Contemporary libertarian organizations

See also the categories Anarchist organizations, Libertarian parties, Libertarian publications, and Libertarian think tanks

Major libertarian organizations in the United States include the Reason Foundation, the Institute for Justice, the Independent Institute, the Cato Institute, Liberty International, the Foundation for Economic Education, the Ludwig von Mises Institute, and the Center for Libertarian Studies. Since the 1950s, many American libertarian organizations have adopted a free-market stance as well as supporting civil liberties and non-interventionist foreign policies.

The activist Free State Project, formed in 2001, is working to entice 20,000 libertarians to New Hampshire to influence state policy.

Libertarian organizations founded outside the United States include the Mont Pelerin Society in Switzerland, and the Francisco Marroquín University in Guatemala.

Active libertarian student organizations include Students For Liberty and Young Americans for Liberty. Students for Liberty was founded in the United States in 2007, but as of 2014 had over 1000 chapters across North America and worldwide, including in Europe, Asia, Africa, and South America.

A number of countries have libertarian parties that run candidates for political office. The first Libertarian Party was formed in the United States in 1971 and has grown to become the third largest and leading alternative American political party. As of (date?) it had a reported 511,277 voters (0.46% of total electorate) registered as Libertarian in the 31 states that report Libertarian registration statistics and Washington, D.C.

Criticism

Main article: Criticism of libertarianism

Criticism of libertarianism includes ethical, economic, environmental, pragmatic and philosophical concerns. These concerns are most commonly voiced by critics on the left and directed against the more right-leaning schools of libertarian thought. One such argument is the view that it has no explicit theory of liberty. It has also been argued that laissez-faire capitalism does not necessarily produce the best or most efficient outcome, nor does its philosophy of individualism and policies of deregulation prevent the abuse of natural resources.

Critics have accused libertarianism of promoting "atomistic" individualism that ignores the role of groups and communities in shaping an individual's identity. Libertarians have responded by denying that they promote this form of individualism, arguing that recognition and protection of individualism does not mean the rejection of community living. Libertarians also argue that they are simply against individuals' being forced to have ties with communities and that individuals should be allowed to sever ties with communities they dislike and form new communities instead.

Critics such as Corey Robin describe this type of libertarianism as fundamentally a reactionary conservative ideology united with more traditionalist conservative thought and goals by a desire to enforce hierarchical power and social relations. Similarly, Nancy MacLean has argued that libertarianism is a radical right ideology that has stood against democracy. According to MacLean, libertarian-leaning Charles and David Koch have used anonymous, dark money campaign contributions, a network of libertarian institutes and lobbying for the appointment of libertarian, pro-business judges to United States federal and state courts to oppose taxes, public education, employee protection laws, environmental protection laws and the New Deal Social Security program.

Conservative philosopher Russell Kirk argued that libertarians "bear no authority, temporal or spiritual" and do not "venerate ancient beliefs and customs, or the natural world, or country, or the immortal spark in fellow men". Libertarians have responded by saying that they do venerate these ancient traditions, but are against the law's being used to force individuals to follow them.

See also

References

  1. Wolff, Jonathan (2016). "Libertarianism". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-S036-1. ISBN 9780415250696.
  2. Vossen, Bas Van Der (2017). "Libertarianism". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.86. ISBN 978-0-19-022863-7.
  3. Mack, Eric (2011). Klosko, George (ed.). "Libertarianism". The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy: 673–688. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238804.003.0041.
  4. ^ Boaz, David (30 January 2009). "Libertarianism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 4 May 2015. Retrieved 21 February 2017. ibertarianism, political philosophy that takes individual liberty to be the primary political value.
  5. "Non-Aggression Principle". Retrieved 23 November 2024. There are a small group of libertarians who do not accept the non- aggression axiom.
  6. Woodcock, George (2004) . Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements. Peterborough: Broadview Press. p. 16. ISBN 978-1551116297. or the very nature of the libertarian attitude—its rejection of dogma, its deliberate avoidance of rigidly systematic theory, and, above all, its stress on extreme freedom of choice and on the primacy of the individual judgement [sic].
  7. ^ Long, Joseph. W (1996). "Toward a Libertarian Theory of Class". Social Philosophy and Policy. 15 (2): 310. "When I speak of 'libertarianism' I mean all three of these very different movements. It might be protested that LibCap , LibSoc and LibPop are too different from one another to be treated as aspects of a single point of view. But they do share a common—or at least an overlapping—intellectual ancestry."
  8. ^ Carlson, Jennifer D. (2012). "Libertarianism". In Miller, Wilburn R., ed. The Social History of Crime and Punishment in America. London: SAGE Publications. p. 1006 Archived 30 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ISBN 1412988764. "There exist three major camps in libertarian thought: right-libertarianism, socialist libertarianism, and left-libertarianism; the extent to which these represent distinct ideologies as opposed to variations on a theme is contested by scholars."
  9. ^ Francis, Mark (December 1983). "Human Rights and Libertarians". Australian Journal of Politics & History. 29 (3): 462–472. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8497.1983.tb00212.x. ISSN 0004-9522.
  10. ^ Otero, Carlos Peregrin, ed. (1994). Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments, Volumes 2–3. Taylor & Francis. p. 617 Archived 9 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ISBN 978-0415106948.
  11. ^ Joseph Déjacque. De l'être-humain mâle et femelle – Lettre à P.J. Proudhon par Joseph Déjacque Archived 17 September 2019 at the Wayback Machine (in French).
  12. Long, Roderick T. (2012). "The Rise of Social Anarchism". In Gaus, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred, eds. The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. p. 223 Archived 30 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine. "In the meantime, anarchist theories of a more communist or collectivist character had been developing as well. One important pioneer is French anarcho-communist Joseph Déjacque (1821–1864), who appears to have been the first thinker to adopt the term 'libertarian' for this position; hence 'libertarianism' initially denoted a communist rather than a free-market ideology."
  13. Long, Roderick T. (2012). "Anarchism". In Gaus, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred, eds. The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. p. 227 Archived 30 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine. "In its oldest sense, it is a synonym either for anarchism in general or social anarchism in particular."
  14. ^ Rothbard, Murray (2009) . The Betrayal of the American Right (PDF). Mises Institute. p. 83. ISBN 978-1610165013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 10 November 2019. One gratifying aspect of our rise to some prominence is that, for the first time in my memory, we, 'our side,' had captured a crucial word from the enemy. 'Libertarians' had long been simply a polite word for left-wing anarchists, that is for anti-private property anarchists, either of the communist or syndicalist variety. But now we had taken it over.
  15. ^ Marshall, Peter (2009). Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. p. 641 Archived 30 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine. "For a long time, libertarian was interchangeable in France with anarchism but in recent years, its meaning has become more ambivalent. Some anarchists like Daniel Guérin will call themselves 'libertarian socialists', partly to avoid the negative overtones still associated with anarchism, and partly to stress the place of anarchism within the socialist tradition. Even Marxists of the New Left like E. P. Thompson call themselves 'libertarian' to distinguish themselves from those authoritarian socialists and communists who believe in revolutionary dictatorship and vanguard parties."
  16. ^ Kropotkin, Peter (1927). Anarchism: A Collection of Revolutionary Writings. Courier Dover Publications. p. 150. ISBN 978-0486119861. It attacks not only capital, but also the main sources of the power of capitalism: law, authority, and the State.
  17. ^ Otero, Carlos Peregrin (2003). "Introduction to Chomsky's Social Theory". In Otero, Carlos Peregrin (ed.). Radical Priorities. Chomsky, Noam Chomsky (3rd ed.). Oakland, California: AK Press. p. 26. ISBN 1902593693.
  18. ^ Chomsky, Noam (2003). Carlos Peregrin Otero (ed.). Radical Priorities (3rd ed.). Oakland, California: AK Press. pp. 227–228. ISBN 1902593693.
  19. ^ Carlson, Jennifer D. (2012). "Libertarianism". In Miller, Wilbur R. The Social History of Crime and Punishment in America: An Encyclopedia. SAGE Publications. p. 1006 Archived 21 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine. "ocialist libertarians view any concentration of power into the hands of a few (whether politically or economically) as antithetical to freedom and thus advocate for the simultaneous abolition of both government and capitalism".
  20. ^ Goodway, David (2006). Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow: Left-Libertarian Thought and British Writers from William Morris to Colin Ward. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. p. 4 Archived 8 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine. ISBN 978-1846310256. "'Libertarian' and 'libertarianism' are frequently employed by anarchists as synonyms for 'anarchist' and 'anarchism', largely as an attempt to distance themselves from the negative connotations of 'anarchy' and its derivatives. The situation has been vastly complicated in recent decades with the rise of anarcho-capitalism, 'minimal statism' and an extreme right-wing laissez-faire philosophy advocated by such theorists as Murray Rothbard and Robert Nozick and their adoption of the words 'libertarian' and 'libertarianism'. It has therefore now become necessary to distinguish between their right libertarianism and the left libertarianism of the anarchist tradition".
  21. ^ Newman, Saul (2010). The Politics of Postanarchism, Edinburgh University Press. p. 43 Archived 30 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ISBN 978-0748634958. "It is important to distinguish between anarchism and certain strands of right-wing libertarianism which at times go by the same name (for example, Murray Rothbard's anarcho-capitalism). There is a complex debate within this tradition between those like Robert Nozick, who advocate a 'minimal state', and those like Rothbard who want to do away with the state altogether and allow all transactions to be governed by the market alone. From an anarchist perspective, however, both positions—the minimal state (minarchist) and the no-state ('anarchist') positions—neglect the problem of economic domination; in other words, they neglect the hierarchies, oppressions, and forms of exploitation that would inevitably arise in a laissez-faire 'free' market. Anarchism, therefore, has no truck with this right-wing libertarianism, not only because it neglects economic inequality and domination, but also because in practice (and theory) it is highly inconsistent and contradictory. The individual freedom invoked by right-wing libertarians is only a narrow economic freedom within the constraints of a capitalist market, which, as anarchists show, is no freedom at all".
  22. ^ Cite error: The named reference Marshall p. 565 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  23. ^ Cite error: The named reference Carlson was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  24. ^ Nozick, Robert (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books.
  25. Geloso, Vincent; Leeson, Peter T. (2020). "Are Anarcho-Capitalists Insane? Medieval Icelandic Conflict Institutions in Comparative Perspective". Revue d'économie politique. 130 (6): 957–974. doi:10.3917/redp.306.0115. ISSN 0373-2630. S2CID 235008718. Anarcho-capitalism is a variety of libertarianism according to which all government institutions can and should be replaced by private ones.
  26. Hussain, Syed B. (2004). Encyclopedia of Capitalism, Volume 2. New York: Facts on File Inc. p. 492. ISBN 0816052247. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 31 October 2015. In the modern world, political ideologies are largely defined by their attitude towards capitalism. Marxists want to overthrow it, liberals to curtail it extensively, conservatives to curtail it moderately. Those who maintain that capitalism is an excellent economic system, unfairly maligned, with little or no need for corrective government policy, are generally known as libertarians.
  27. Duncan, Craig; Machan, Tibor R. (2 June 2024). Libertarianism: For and Against. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-4259-4.
  28. Russell, Dean (1955). "Who is a libertarian?". Foundation for Economic Education. Many of us call ourselves 'liberals.' And it is true that the word 'liberal' once described persons who respected the individual and feared the use of mass compulsions. But the leftists have now corrupted that once-proud term to identify themselves and their program of more government ownership of property and more controls over persons. As a result, those of us who believe in freedom must explain that when we call ourselves liberals, we mean liberals in the uncorrupted classical sense. At best, this is awkward and subject to misunderstanding. Here is a suggestion: Let those of us who love liberty trade-mark and reserve for our own use the good and honorable word 'libertarian'.
  29. Teles, Steven; Kenney, Daniel A. "Spreading the Word: The Diffusion of American Conservatism in Europe and Beyond". In Kopsten, Jeffrey; Steinmo, Sven, eds. (2007). Growing Apart?: America and Europe in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge University Press. pp. 136–169.
  30. Singleton, Alex (30 May 2008). "How Libertarians undermine liberty". Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 25 June 2009. Retrieved 10 January 2016.
  31. Staff writer (24 March 2019). "Feiglin: Palestinians in Gaza had more rights under Israel". Israel Hayom. Retrieved 26 August 2019.
  32. Harkov, Lahav (17 March 2019). "The Feiglin phenomenon". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 17 March 2019. The leader of the rising Zehut Party is attracting more than just young potheads to his libertarian platform.
  33. "Zehut". Israel Democracy Institute. Retrieved 21 February 2019. and personal liberty. Its platform includes libertarian economic positions .
  34. Eglash, Ruth (4 April 2019). "A pro-pot party could tip the scales in Israel's upcoming election". The Washington Post. Retrieved 7 April 2019. Now you have two special-interest groups. What pulls them together is the strong libertarian, anti-state agenda that works well for both.
  35. Staden, Martin (2 December 2015). "Remembering the Founder of SA Libertarianism, Dr. Marc Swanepoel". Rational Standard. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
  36. "Javier Milei, a libertarian, may be elected to Argentina's congress". The Economist. 7 October 2021. Retrieved 21 November 2023.
  37. ^ Rupert, Mark (2006). Globalization and International Political Economy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 66. ISBN 0742529436.
  38. Hahnel 2005, pp. 138–139.
  39. ^ "A new group of left-wing presidents takes over in Latin America". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 22 November 2023.
  40. ^ "Can a rise of leftist leaders bring real change to Latin America?". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 22 November 2023.
  41. ^ Boyes, Roger (22 November 2023). "Biden risks losing Latin America to Beijing". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Archived from the original on 14 June 2022. Retrieved 22 November 2023.
  42. Unsworth, David (19 November 2023). "Javier Milei crushes Argentine left, becomes world's first libertarian head of state". Fox News. Retrieved 25 November 2023.
  43. "The World's First Libertarian President". Reason. 20 November 2023. Retrieved 29 November 2024.
  44. "Argentine libertarian Milei pledges new political era after election win". Reuters. 20 November 2023. Retrieved 21 November 2023.
  45. William Belsham (1789). Essays. C. Dilly. p. 11. Archived from the original on 11 April 2021. Retrieved 26 October 2020Original from the University of Michigan, digitized 21 May 2007{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  46. OED November 2010 edition
  47. The British Critic. p. 432. "The author's Latin verses, which are rather more intelligible than his English, mark him for a furious Libertarian (if we may coin such a term) and a zealous admirer of France, and her liberty, under Bonaparte; such liberty!"
  48. Seeley, John Robert (1878). Life and Times of Stein: Or Germany and Prussia in the Napoleonic Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3: 355.
  49. Maitland, Frederick William (July 1901). "William Stubbs, Bishop of Oxford". English Historical Review. 16: 419.
  50. Marshall, Peter (2009). Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. p. 641. "The word 'libertarian' has long been associated with anarchism, and has been used repeatedly throughout this work. The term originally denoted a person who upheld the doctrine of the freedom of the will; in this sense, Godwin was not a 'libertarian', but a 'necessitarian'. It came however to be applied to anyone who approved of liberty in general. In anarchist circles, it was first used by Joseph Déjacque as the title of his anarchist journal Le Libertaire, Journal du Mouvement Social published in New York in 1858. At the end of the last century, the anarchist Sebastien Faure took up the word, to stress the difference between anarchists and authoritarian socialists".
  51. Woodcock, George (1962). Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements. Meridian Books. p. 280. "He called himself a "social poet," and published two volumes of heavily didactic verse—Lazaréennes and Les Pyrénées Nivelées. In New York, from 1858 to 1861, he edited an anarchist paper entitled Le Libertaire, Journal du Mouvement Social, in whose pages he printed as a serial his vision of the anarchist Utopia, entitled L'Humanisphére."
  52. Nettlau, Max (1996). A Short History of Anarchism. London: Freedom Press. p. 162. ISBN 978-0900384899. OCLC 37529250.
  53. Ward, Colin (2004). Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction Archived 13 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 62. "For a century, anarchists have used the word 'libertarian' as a synonym for 'anarchist', both as a noun and an adjective. The celebrated anarchist journal Le Libertaire was founded in 1896. However, much more recently the word has been appropriated by various American free-market philosophers ."
  54. Chomsky, Noam (23 February 2002). "The Week Online Interviews Chomsky". Z Magazine. Z Communications. Archived from the original on 13 January 2013. Retrieved 21 November 2011. The term libertarian as used in the US means something quite different from what it meant historically and still means in the rest of the world. Historically, the libertarian movement has been the anti-statist wing of the socialist movement. Socialist anarchism was libertarian socialism.
  55. Comegna, Anthony; Gomez, Camillo (3 October 2018). "Libertarianism, Then and Now" Archived 3 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine. Libertarianism. Cato Institute. " Benjamin Tucker was the first American to really start using the term 'libertarian' as a self-identifier somewhere in the late 1870s or early 1880s." Retrieved 3 August 2020.
  56. Russell, Dean (May 1955). "Who Is A Libertarian?". The Freeman. 5 (5). Foundation for Economic Education. Archived from the original on 26 June 2010. Retrieved 6 March 2010.
  57. Russel Dean (May 1955). "Who Is A Libertarian" Archived 28 November 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Foundation for Economic Education. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
  58. ^ Tucker, Jeffrey (15 September 2016). "Where Does the Term "Libertarian" Come From Anyway?" Archived 23 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine. Foundation for Economic Education. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
  59. Paul Cantor, The Invisible Hand in Popular Culture: Liberty Vs. Authority in American Film and TV, University Press of Kentucky, 2012, p. 353, n. 2.
  60. ^ Lester, J. C. (22 October 2017). "New-Paradigm Libertarianism: a Very Brief Explanation" Archived 6 July 2018 at the Wayback Machine. PhilPapers. Retrieved 26 June 2019.
  61. Teles, Steven; Kenney, Daniel A. (2008). "Spreading the Word: The diffusion of American Conservatism in Europe and beyond". In Steinmo, Sven. Growing Apart?: America and Europe in the 21st Century Archived 13 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine Growing Apart?: America and Europe in the Twenty-first Century]. Cambridge University Press. pp. 136–169.
  62. "National Book Award: 1975 – Philosophy and Religion" (1975). National Book Foundation. Retrieved 9 September 2011. Archived 9 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  63. ^ Schaefer, David Lewis (30 April 2008). "Robert Nozick and the Coast of Utopia" Archived 21 August 2014 at the Wayback Machine. The New York Sun. Retrieved 26 June 2019.
  64. ^ Boaz, David; Kirby, David (18 October 2006). "The Libertarian Vote" Archived 31 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Cato Institute. Retrieved 10 February 2020.
  65. Carpenter, Ted Galen; Innocent, Malen (2008). "Foreign Policy". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Cato Institute. pp. 177–180. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n109. ISBN 978-1412965804. LCCN 2008009151. OCLC 750831024. Archived from the original on 23 March 2022. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  66. Edward A. Olsen (2002). US National Defense for the Twenty-First Century: The Grand Exit Strategy. Taylor & Francis. p. 182 Archived 1 May 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ISBN 978-0714681405.
  67. "The Political Compass". The Political Compass. 11 October 2013. Retrieved 1 November 2013.
  68. ^ Carson, Kevin (15 June 2014). "What is Left-Libertarianism?" Archived 3 September 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Center for a Stateless Society. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
  69. ^ "Anarchism". In Gaus, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred, eds. (2012). The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. p. 227.
  70. ^ Block, Walter (2010). "Libertarianism Is Unique and Belongs Neither to the Right Nor the Left: A Critique of the Views of Long, Holcombe, and Baden on the Left, Hoppe, Feser, and Paul on the Right" Archived 13 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine. Journal of Libertarian Studies. 22. pp. 127–170.
  71. ^ Peter Vallentyne. "Libertarianism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, CSLI, Stanford University. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  72. ^ Kymlicka, Will (2005). "libertarianism, left-". In Honderich, Ted. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. New York City: Oxford University Press. p. 516. ISBN 978-0199264797. "'Left-libertarianism' is a new term for an old conception of justice, dating back to Grotius. It combines the libertarian assumption that each person possesses a natural right of self-ownership over his person with the egalitarian premiss that natural resources should be shared equally. Right-wing libertarians argue that the right of self-ownership entails the right to appropriate unequal parts of the external world, such as unequal amounts of land. According to left-libertarians, however, the world's natural resources were initially unowned, or belonged equally to all, and it is illegitimate for anyone to claim exclusive private ownership of these resources to the detriment of others. Such private appropriation is legitimate only if everyone can appropriate an equal amount, or if those who appropriate more are taxed to compensate those who are thereby excluded from what was once common property. Historic proponents of this view include Thomas Paine, Herbert Spencer, and Henry George. Recent exponents include Philippe Van Parijs and Hillel Steiner."
  73. ^ Marshall, Peter (2008). Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. London: Harper Perennial. p. 641 Archived 7 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine. "Left libertarianism can therefore range from the decentralist who wishes to limit and devolve State power, to the syndicalist who wants to abolish it altogether. It can even encompass the Fabians and the social democrats who wish to socialize the economy but who still see a limited role for the State".
  74. ^ Spitz, Jean-Fabien (March 2006). "Left-wing libertarianism: equality based on self-ownership". Raisons Politiques. 23 (3): 23–46. doi:10.3917/rai.023.0023. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 11 March 2018.
  75. ^ "Anarchism". In Gaus, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred, eds. (2012). The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. p. 227. "The term 'left-libertarianism' has at least three meanings. In its oldest sense, it is a synonym either for anarchism in general or social anarchism in particular. Later it became a term for the left or Konkinite wing of the free-market libertarian movement, and has since come to cover a range of pro-market but anti-capitalist positions, mostly individualist anarchist, including agorism and mutualism, often with an implication of sympathies (such as for radical feminism or the labor movement) not usually shared by anarcho-capitalists. In a third sense it has recently come to be applied to a position combining individual self-ownership with an egalitarian approach to natural resources; most proponents of this position are not anarchists."
  76. ^ Vallentyne, Peter (March 2009). "Libertarianism". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 ed.). Stanford, California: Stanford University. Archived from the original on 6 July 2019. Retrieved 5 March 2010. Libertarianism is committed to full self-ownership. A distinction can be made, however, between right-libertarianism and left-libertarianism, depending on the stance taken on how natural resources can be owned.
  77. Goodwin, Barbara (2016). Using Political Ideas. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. p. 151. ISBN 978-1118708385. Howewer, enough has been said to show that most anarchists have nothing in common with those libertarians of the far-right, the anarcho-capitalists
  78. Paul, Ellen F.; Miller, Fred D.; Paul, Jeffrey, eds. (2007). Liberalism: Old and New. Vol. 24. Cambridge University Press. p. 199. ISBN 978-0521703055.
  79. Estlund, David, ed. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press. p. 162. ISBN 978-0195376692.
  80. Hammer, Espen (2013). "Libertarianism, Political". In Kaldis, Byron (ed.). Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Vol. 1. SAGE Publications. pp. 558–560. ISBN 978-1506332611.
  81. Cohn, Jesse (20 April 2009). "Anarchism". In Ness, Immanuel (ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 6. doi:10.1002/9781405198073.wbierp0039. ISBN 978-1405198073. 'ibertarianism' a term that, until the mid-twentieth century, was synonymous with "anarchism" per se.
  82. Guérin, Daniel (1970). Anarchism: From Theory to Practice. New York City: Monthly Review Press. p. 12. "narchism is really a synonym for socialism. The anarchist is primarily a socialist whose aim is to abolish the exploitation of man by man. Anarchism is only one of the streams of socialist thought, that stream whose main components are concern for liberty and haste to abolish the State." ISBN 978-0853451754.
  83. ^ Gamble, Andrew (August 2013). Freeden, Michael; Stears, Marc (eds.). "Economic Libertarianism". The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford University Press: 405. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0008.
  84. ^ Gamble, Andrew (August 2013). Freeden, Michael; Stears, Marc (eds.). "Economic Libertarianism". The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford University Press: 406. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0008.
  85. Gamble, Andrew (August 2013). Freeden, Michael; Stears, Marc (eds.). "Economic Libertarianism". The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford University Press: 405–406. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0008.
  86. Francis, Mark (December 1983). "Human Rights and Libertarians". Australian Journal of Politics & History. 29 (3): 462. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8497.1983.tb00212.x. ISSN 0004-9522.
  87. Francis, Mark (December 1983). "Human Rights and Libertarians". Australian Journal of Politics & History. 29 (3): 462–463. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8497.1983.tb00212.x. ISSN 0004-9522.
  88. Francis, Mark (December 1983). "Human Rights and Libertarians". Australian Journal of Politics & History. 29 (3): 463. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8497.1983.tb00212.x. ISSN 0004-9522.
  89. ^ Rothbard, Murray (1 March 1971). "The Left and Right Within Libertarianism" Archived 1 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine. WIN: Peace and Freedom Through Nonviolent Action. 7 (4): 6–10. Retrieved 14 January 2020.
  90. ^ Read, Leonard E. (January 1956). "Neither Left Nor Right" Archived 18 July 2014 at the Wayback Machine. The Freeman. 48 (2): 71–73.
  91. ^ Browne, Harry (21 December 1998). "The Libertarian Stand on Abortion" Archived 6 October 2010 at the Wayback Machine. HarryBrowne.org. Retrieved 14 January 2020.
  92. ^ Raimondo, Justin (2000). An Enemy of the State. Chapter 4: "Beyond left and right". Prometheus Books. p. 159.
  93. ^ Machan, Tibor R. (2004). "Neither Left Nor Right: Selected Columns" Archived 1 January 2011 at the Wayback Machine. 522. Hoover Institution Press. ISBN 978-0817939823.
  94. ^ Robin, Corey (2011). The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin. Oxford University Press. pp. 15–16. ISBN 978-0199793747.
  95. Harmel, Robert; Gibson, Rachel K. (June 1995). "Right-Libertarian Parties and the "New Values": A Re-examination". Scandinavian Political Studies. 18 (July 1993): 97–118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.1995.tb00157.x. ISSN 0080-6757.
  96. Robinson, Emily; et al. (2017). "Telling stories about post-war Britain: popular individualism and the 'crisis' of the 1970s" Archived 3 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine. Twentieth Century British History. 28 (2): 268–304.
  97. Kitschelt, Herbert; McGann, Anthony J. (1997) . The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. University of Michigan Press. p. 27 Archived 5 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ISBN 978-0472084418.
  98. Mudde, Cas (11 October 2016). The Populist Radical Right: A Reader Archived 4 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine (1st ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-1138673861.
  99. Baradat, Leon P. (2015). Political Ideologies. Routledge. p. 31. ISBN 978-1317345558.
  100. Hess, Karl (18 February 2015). "Anarchism Without Hyphens & The Left/Right Spectrum" Archived 17 March 2020 at the Wayback Machine. Center for a Stateless Society. Tulsa Alliance of the Libertarian Left. Retrieved 17 March 2020. "The far left, as far as you can get away from the right, would logically represent the opposite tendency and, in fact, has done just that throughout history. The left has been the side of politics and economics that opposes the concentration of power and wealth and, instead, advocates and works toward the distribution of power into the maximum number of hands."
  101. Long, Roderick T. (8 April 2006). "Rothbard's 'Left and Right': Forty Years Later" Archived 10 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Mises Institute. Rothbard Memorial Lecture, Austrian Scholars Conference 2006. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  102. Rothbard, Murray (Spring 1965). "Left and Right: The Prospects for Liberty". Left and Right: A Journal of Libertarian Thought. 1 (1): 4–22.
  103. George Woodcock. Anarchism: A History of Llibertarian Ideas and Movements. Petersborough, Ontario: Broadview Press. pp. 11–31, especially p. 18. ISBN 1551116294.
  104. Roderick T. Long (1998). "Towards a Libertarian Theory of Class" (PDF). Social Philosophy and Policy. 15 (2): 303–349, at p. 304. doi:10.1017/S0265052500002028. S2CID 145150666.
  105. Duncan Watts (2002). Understanding American Government and Politics: A Guide for A2 Politics Students. Manchester, England. Manchester University Press. p. 246.
  106. Zwolinski, Matt. "Libertarianism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 1 November 2022.
  107. Black, Jeremy; Brewer, Paul; Shaw, Anthony; Chandler, Malcolm; Cheshire, Gerard; Cranfield, Ingrid; Ralph Lewis, Brenda; Sutherland, Joe; Vint, Robert (2003). World History. Bath, Somerset: Parragon Books. p. 342. ISBN 0-75258-227-5.
  108. Barry, Norman (1982). "The Tradition of Spontaneous Order". Literature of Liberty. 5 (2).
  109. "Misplaced Pages's Model Follows Hayek". The Wall Street Journal. 15 April 2009.
  110. Boaz, David (1998). Libertarianism: A Primer. Free Press. pp. 22–26.
  111. Conway, David (2008). "Freedom of Speech". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). Liberalism, Classical. The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE; Cato Institute. pp. 295–298. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n112. ISBN 978-1412965804. LCCN 2008009151. OCLC 750831024. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 31 October 2015. Depending on the context, libertarianism can be seen as either the contemporary name for classical liberalism, adopted to avoid confusion in those countries where liberalism is widely understood to denote advocacy of expansive government powers, or as a more radical version of classical liberalism.
  112. "About the Libertarian Party" Archived 8 May 2018 at the Wayback Machine. Libertarian Party. "Libertarians strongly oppose any government interference into their personal, family, and business decisions. Essentially, we believe all Americans should be free to live their lives and pursue their interests as they see fit as long as they do no harm to another". Retrieved 2 May 2020.
  113. Marshall, Peter (2009) . Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism (POLS ed.). Oakland, California: PM Press. p. 641. "Left libertarianism can therefore range from the decentralist who wishes to limit and devolve State power, to the syndicalist who wants to abolish it altogether. It can even encompass the Fabians and the social democrats who wish to socialize the economy but who still see a limited role for the State." ISBN 978-1604860641.
  114. Richman, Sheldon (3 February 2011). "Libertarian Left". The American Conservative. Retrieved 1 January 2023.
  115. Thaler, Richard; Sunstein, Cass (2003). "Libertarian Paternalism". The American Economic Review. 93: 175–179.
  116. Thaler, Richard H. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Sunstein, Cass R. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300122237. OCLC 181517463.
  117. ^ Kahneman, Daniel (25 October 2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow (1st ed.). New York City, NY. ISBN 978-0374275631. OCLC 706020998.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  118. Sterba, James (2013). The Pursuit of Justice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 66. ISBN 978-1442221796.
  119. Carter, Ian (2 August 2016). "Positive and Negative Liberty". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 16 November 2019. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
  120. Sterba, James (1980). Justice: Alternative Political Perspectives. Boston: Wadsworth Publishing Company. p. 175. ISBN 978-0534007621.
  121. Sterba, James (2013). The Pursuit of Justice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 52. ISBN 978-1442221796.
  122. Walker, Jesse (23 July 2013). "Three Lessons for Libertarian Populists". Reason. Retrieved 25 September 2022.
  123. ^ Arbor, Ann. The ANES Guide to Public Opinion and Electoral Behavior, 1948–2004. American National Election Studies.
  124. "Q8. What is the Nolan Chart?" Archived 18 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Nolan Chart. Retrieved 10 February 2020.
  125. "About the Quiz" Archived 31 March 2020 at the Wayback Machine. Advocates for Self-Government. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  126. Carpenter, Ted Galen; Innocent, Malen (2008). "Foreign Policy". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications; Cato Institute. pp. 177–180. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n109. ISBN 978-1-4129-6580-4. LCCN 2008009151. OCLC 750831024.
  127. Olsen, Edward A. (2002). US National Defense for the Twenty-First Century: The Grand Exit Strategy. Taylor & Francis. p. 182. ISBN 0714681407. ISBN 9780714681405.
  128. ^ "Gallup Database: 2006 Survey Results" Archived 23 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Gallup. Retrieved 23 December 2019.
  129. ^ Kiley, Jocelyn (25 August 2014). "In Search of Libertarians" Archived 7 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine. Pew Research Center. "14% say the term libertarian describes them well; 77% of those know the definition (11% of total), while 23% do not (3% of total)."
  130. ^ Becker, Amanda (30 April 2015). "Americans don't like big government – but like many programs: poll" Archived 29 July 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 31 October 2019.
  131. ^ Boaz, David (10 February 2016). "Gallup Finds More Libertarians in the Electorate" Archived 31 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 31 October 2019.
  132. Boaz, David (21 November 1998). "Preface for the Japanese Edition of Libertarianism: A Primer" Archived 10 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Cato Institute. Retrieved 10 December 2019.
  133. Rothbard, Murray (2005). Excerpt from "Concepts of the Role of Intellectuals in Social Change Toward Laissez Faire", The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. IX, No. 2 (Fall 1990) at mises.org Archived 8 November 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  134. Rothbard, Murray (2005). "The Ancient Chinese Libertarian Tradition", Mises Daily (5 December 2005) (original source unknown) at mises.org Archived 8 November 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  135. Boaz, David (30 January 2009). "Libertarianism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 4 May 2015. Retrieved 21 February 2017. An appreciation for spontaneous order can be found in the writings of the ancient Chinese philosopher Lao-tzu (6th century bce), who urged rulers to "do nothing" because "without law or compulsion, men would dwell in harmony."
  136. Mullett, M.A. (2014). Martin Luther. Routledge Historical Biographies. Taylor & Francis. p. 9. ISBN 978-1-317-64861-1. Retrieved 12 March 2023.
  137. More, T. (1969). Complete Works. Yale University Press. Retrieved 12 March 2023.
  138. Boaz, David (7 March 2007). "A Note on Labels: Why 'Libertarian'?". Libertarianism.org. Cato Institute. Retrieved 4 July 2013. Archived 16 July 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  139. Garbooshian, Adrina Michelle (2006). The Concept of Human Dignity in the French and American Enlightenments: Religion, Virtue, Liberty. ProQuest. p. 472. ISBN 978-0542851605. "Influenced by Locke and Smith, certain segments of society affirmed classical liberalism, with a libertarian bent."
  140. Cantor, Paul A. (2012). The Invisible Hand in Popular Culture: Liberty Vs. Authority in American Film and TV. University Press of Kentucky. p. xiii Archived 9 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ISBN 978-0813140827. "he roots of libertarianism lie in the classical liberal tradition".
  141. Long, Roderick T. (1998). "Toward a Libertarian Theory of Class". Social Philosophy and Policy. 15 (2): 310. doi:10.1017/s0265052500002028. S2CID 145150666.
  142. Boaz, David (2010). The Libertarian Reader: Classic and Contemporary Writings from Lao Tzu to Milton Friedman. Simon & Schuster. p. 123 Archived 13 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ISBN 978-1439118337.
  143. ^ Rothbard, Murray (1973) . "The Libertarian Heritage: The American Revolution and Classical Liberalism" Archived 18 June 2015 at the Wayback Machine. In For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto. LewRockwell.com. Retrieved 10 December 2019.
  144. ^ Sprading, Charles T. (1913) . Liberty and the Great Libertarians. Mises Institute. p. 74 Archived 5 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ISBN 978-1610161077.
  145. Hoffman, David C. (Fall 2006). "Paine and Prejudice: Rhetorical Leadership through Perceptual Framing in Common Sense". Rhetoric and Public Affairs. 9 (3): 373–410.
  146. Maier, Pauline (1997). American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence. New York City: Knopf. pp. 90–91.
  147. Hitchens, Christopher (2006). Thomas Paine's Rights of Man. Grove Press. p. 37. ISBN 0802143830.
  148. Lamb, Robert (2010). "Liberty, Equality, and the Boundaries of Ownership: Thomas Paine's Theory of Property Rights". Review of Politics. 72 (3): 483–511. doi:10.1017/s0034670510000331. hdl:10871/9896. S2CID 55413082.
  149. Ousby, Ian (1993). The Cambridge Guide to Literature in English. Cambridge University Press. p. 305. ISBN 978-0521440868. Archived from the original on 23 March 2022.
  150. Joseph Déjacque, "De l'être-humain mâle et femelle–Lettre à P.J. Proudhon" (1857).
  151. Robert Graham, Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas – Volume One: From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939), Black Rose Books, 2005
  152. "l'Echange" Archived 25 June 2019 at the Wayback Machine, article in Le Libertaire no 6, 21 September 1858, New York.
  153. Nettlau, Max (1996). A Short History of Anarchism. Freedom Press. p. 145. ISBN 0-900384-89-1.
  154. Nettlau, Max (1996). A Short History of Anarchism. Freedom Press. p. 162. ISBN 0-900384-89-1.
  155. Avrich, Paul (2006). The Russian Anarchists. Stirling: AK Press. pp. 195, 204. ISBN 1904859488. Archived from the original on 23 March 2022. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  156. Nomad, Max (1966). "The Anarchist Tradition". In Drachkovitch, Milorad M. (ed.). The Revolutionary Internationals, 1864–1943. Stanford University Press. p. 88. ISBN 0804702934.
  157. Holbrow, Marnie, "Daring but Divided" Archived 29 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine (Socialist Review, November 2002).
  158. Berry, David. "Fascism or Revolution." Le Libertaire. August 1936.
  159. Antony Beevor, The Battle for Spain: The Spanish Civil War 1936–1939, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2006, p. 46, ISBN 978-0297848325.
  160. Gruppo Comunista Anarchico di Firenze (October 1979). "Anarchist Communism & Libertarian Communism" Archived 18 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine. L'informatore di parte. 4.
  161. Hahnel 2005, p. 138.
  162. Hahnel 2005, p. 145.
  163. Hahnel 2005, pp. 143–144.
  164. Hahnel 2005, pp. 146–147.
  165. Jesus Ruiz. Posibilismo libertario. Felix Morga, Alcalde de Najera (1891–1936). El Najerilla-Najera. 2003.
  166. Renof, Israël Renof (May 1968). Possibilisme libertaire Archived 29 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine (PDF). Noir et Rouge. 41: 16–23.
  167. "Manifesto of Libertarian Communism – Georges Fontenis". libcom.org. Archived from the original on 23 October 2019. Retrieved 13 June 2012.
  168. London Federation of Anarchists involvement in Carrara conference, 1968 Archived 19 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine International Institute of Social History. Retrieved 19 January 2010.
  169. ^ Short history of the IAF-IFA A-infos news project, Accessed 19 January 2010.
  170. "The Left-Libertarians – the last of an ancient breed – The Villager Newspaper". The Villager. 25 January 2012. Archived from the original on 2 September 2013. Retrieved 2 July 2013.
  171. Anarchist Voices: An Oral History of Anarchism in America by Paul Avrich. AK Press. 2005. pp. 471–472.
  172. Avrich, Paul. Anarchist Voices: An Oral History of Anarchism in America, AK Press, p. 419.
  173. Anarchist Voices: An Oral History Of Anarchism In America by Paul Avrich. AK Press. 2005.
  174. A 1970s associate, subject of David Marr's A spirit gone to another place Archived 18 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine The Sydney Morning Herald obituary, 9 September 2006.
  175. Baker, A. J. (2 February 1998). "Sydney Libertarianism and the Push". Takver's Initiatives. Archived 16 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Archived from the original 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Neale Morison memorial site. Retrieved 2 May 2020.
  176. Takver. "Sydney Libertarians and Anarchism Index". Archived from the original on 29 June 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2013.
  177. "Sydney Libertarianism" Archived 5 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine at the Marxists Internet Archive.
  178. "Libertarian Marxism? – The Anarchist Library". 6 February 2017. Archived from the original on 19 April 2022. Retrieved 16 April 2020.
  179. Ernesto Screpanti, Libertarian communism: Marx Engels and the Political Economy of Freedom, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2007.
  180. Burns, Jennifer (2009). Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand and the American Right. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 309. ISBN 978-0195324877. Archived from the original on 23 March 2022. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  181. Boaz, David (1997). The Libertarian Reader: Classic and Contemporary Readings from Lao-Tzu to Milton Friedman. New York: Free Press. p. 31.
  182. ^ "What was Ayn Rand's view of the libertarian movement?". Ayn Rand Institute. Archived from the original on 15 January 2014. Retrieved 5 March 2014. More specifically, I disapprove of, disagree with and have no connection with, the latest aberration of some conservatives, the so-called "hippies of the right," who attempt to snare the younger or more careless ones of my readers by claiming simultaneously to be followers of my philosophy and advocates of anarchism. libertarians are a monstrous, disgusting bunch of people: they plagiarize my ideas when that fits their purpose, and denounce me in a more vicious manner than any communist publication when that fits their purpose.
  183. Phillips-Fein, Kim (2009). Invisible Hands: The Making of the Conservative Movement from the New Deal to Reagan. New York: W. W. Norton. p. 27. ISBN 978-0393059304.
  184. Galles, Gary (2013). Apostle of Peace: The Radical Mind of Leonard Read. Laissez Faire Books. ISBN 978-1621290513.
  185. Halle, Roland; Ladue, Peter (1980). Karl Hess: Toward Liberty. Direct Cinema, Ltd. .
  186. Raimondo, Justin (2001). An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard. Amherst: Prometheus. pp. 277–278.
  187. Doherty, Brian (2007). Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement. New York: Public Affairs. pp. 562–565.
  188. Rothbard, Murray (5 June 1986). "Letter to David Bergland". Rothbard emphasized that this was relevant as a matter of strategy, writing that the failure to pitch the libertarian message to Middle America might result in the loss of "the tight-assed majority".
  189. Raimondo, Justin (2001). An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard. Amherst: Prometheus. pp. 263–264.
  190. Konkin, Samuel Edward III. "The New Libertarian Manifesto". Archived 5 June 2014 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 10 February 2020.
  191. Carson, Kevin A. (2008). Organization Theory: A Libertarian Perspective. Charleston, SC: BookSurge.
  192. Long, Roderick T. (2008). "An Interview With Roderick Long" Archived 27 March 2020 at the Wayback Machine.
  193. Chartier, Gary (2009). Economic Justice and Natural Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  194. Johnson, Charles W. (2008). "Liberty, Equality, Solidarity: Toward a Dialectical Anarchism" Archived 21 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine. Anarchism/Minarchism: Is a Government Part of a Free Country? In Long, Roderick T.; Machan, Tibor. Aldershot: Ashgate pp. 155–188.
  195. Chartier, Gary; Johnson, Charles W. (2011). Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty. Brooklyn: Minor Compositions/Autonomedia. pp. 1–16.
  196. Richman, Sheldon (3 February 2011). "Libertarian Left: Free-market anti-capitalism, the unknown ideal". The American Conservative. Archived 10 June 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 5 March 2012.
  197. Sciabarra, Chris Matthew (2000). Total Freedom: Toward a Dialectical Libertarianism. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  198. Spangler, Brad (15 September 2006). "Market Anarchism as Stigmergic Socialism". Archived 10 May 2011 at archive.today
  199. Jones, Mark P. (24 February 2020). Voting and Political Representation in America: Issues and Trends [2 volumes]. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 978-1-4408-6085-0.
  200. International Society for Individual Liberty Freedom Network list.
  201. "The Libertarian Party: A History From Hospers to Johnson". 71 Republic. 11 November 2018. Archived from the original on 22 March 2019. Retrieved 22 March 2019.
  202. National Book Foundation. "National Book Awards: 1975 – Philosophy and Religion". Archived 9 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  203. Schaefer, David Lewis (30 April 2008). "Robert Nozick and the Coast of Utopia" Archived 21 August 2014 at the Wayback Machine. The New York Sun.
  204. Rothbard, Murray. (2009). The Betrayal of the American Right. Ludwig von Mises Institute. ISBN 1610165012.
  205. Schneider-Mayerson, Matthew (14 October 2015). Peak Oil: Apocalyptic Environmentalism and Libertarian Political Culture. Chicago. ISBN 978-0226285573. OCLC 922640625.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  206. Teles, Steven; Kenney, Daniel A. (2008). "Spreading the Word: The diffusion of American Conservatism in Europe and Beyond". In Steinmo, Sven (2007). Growing Apart?: America and Europe in the Twenty-First Century Archived 13 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Cambridge University Press. pp. 136–169.
  207. Gregory, Anthony (24 April 2007)."Real World Politics and Radical Libertarianism". LewRockwell.com. Archived 18 June 2015 at the Wayback Machine
  208. Klausner, Manuel (July 1975). "Inside Ronald Reagan". Reason. Retrieved May 2, 2020.
  209. Roberts, Jerry (17 September 1988). "Libertarian Candidate Rolls Out His Values". San Francisco Chronicle.
  210. ^ Nichols, Bruce (15 March 1987). "Ron Paul Wants to Get Americans Thinking: Republican-Turned-Libertarian Seeks Presidency". Dallas Morning News.
  211. Kennedy, J. Michael (10 May 1988). "Politics 88: Hopeless Presidential Race: Libertarian Plods On – Alone and Unheard". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 31 January 2012.
  212. Kutzmann, David M. (24 May 1988). "Small Party Battles Big Government Libertarian Candidate Opposes Intrusion into Private Lives". San Jose Mercury News: 12A.
  213. Rothbard, Murray (1984). "The Reagan Phenomenon". Free Life: The Journal of the Libertarian Alliance. Libertarian Alliance. '4 (1): 1–7. Retrieved September 20, 2020 – via the Mises Institute.
  214. Riggenbach, Jeff (February 5, 2011). "The Reagan Fraud — and After". Mises Institute. Retrieved September 20, 2020.
  215. Kilborn, Peter T. (September 17, 1985). "U.S. Turns Into Debtor Nation". The New York Times. Retrieved May 2, 2020.
  216. Johnston, Oswald (September 17, 1985). "Big Trade Deficit Turns U.S. Into Debtor Nation : First Time Since 1914". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 2, 2020.
  217. Weltch, Matt (September 9, 2011). "Rothbard on Reagan in Reason". Reason. Reason Foundation. Retrieved September 20, 2020.
  218. Thomas, Paul (1985). Karl Marx and the Anarchists. London: Routledge/Kegan Paul. p. 4. ISBN 0710206852.
  219. John Patten (28 October 1968). ""These groups had their roots in the anarchist resurgence of the nineteen sixties. Young militants finding their way to anarchism, often from the anti-bomb and anti-Vietnam war movements, linked up with an earlier generation of activists, largely outside the ossified structures of 'official' anarchism. Anarchist tactics embraced demonstrations, direct action such as industrial militancy and squatting, protest bombings like those of the First of May Group and Angry Brigade—and a spree of publishing activity." "Islands of Anarchy: Simian, Cienfuegos, Refract and their support network" by John Patten". Katesharpleylibrary.net. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 11 October 2013.
  220. "Farrell provides a detailed history of the Catholic Workers and their founders Dorothy Day and Peter Maurin. He explains that their pacifism, anarchism, and commitment to the downtrodden were one of the important models and inspirations for the 60s. As Farrell puts it, "Catholic Workers identified the issues of the sixties before the Sixties began, and they offered models of protest long before the protest decade.""The Spirit of the Sixties: The Making of Postwar Radicalism" by James J. Farrell Archived 6 April 2013 at the Wayback Machine.
  221. "While not always formally recognized, much of the protest of the sixties was anarchist. Within the nascent women's movement, anarchist principles became so widespread that a political science professor denounced what she saw as "The Tyranny of Structurelessness." Several groups have called themselves "Amazon Anarchists." After the Stonewall Rebellion, the New York Gay Liberation Front based their organization in part on a reading of Murray Bookchin's anarchist writings." "Anarchism" by Charley Shively in Encyclopedia of Homosexuality Archived 19 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine. p. 52.
  222. "Within the movements of the sixties there was much more receptivity to anarchism-in-fact than had existed in the movements of the thirties ... But the movements of the sixties were driven by concerns that were more compatible with an expressive style of politics, with hostility to authority in general and state power in particular ... By the late sixties, political protest was intertwined with cultural radicalism based on a critique of all authority and all hierarchies of power. Anarchism circulated within the movement along with other radical ideologies. The influence of anarchism was strongest among radical feminists, in the commune movement, and probably in the Weather Underground and elsewhere in the violent fringe of the anti-war movement." "Anarchism and the Anti-Globalization Movement" by Barbara Epstein Archived 17 March 2011 at the Wayback Machine.
  223. "London Federation of Anarchists involvement in Carrara conference, 1968" Archived 19 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine, International Institute of Social History. Retrieved 19 January 2010.
  224. Infinitely Demanding by Simon Critchley. Verso. 2007. p. 125.
  225. Chamsy el- Ojeili. Beyond post-socialism. Dialogues with the far-left. Palgrave Macmillan. 2015. p. 7.
  226. ^ Pinta et al. 2017.
  227. Belluck, Pam (27 October 2003). "Libertarians Pursue New Political Goal: State of Their Own". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 May 2011.
  228. Kitch, Michael (22 October 2021). "Its founder reflects on the Free State Project". New Hampshire Business Review. Retrieved 30 April 2022.
  229. "FSP current mover count". fsp.org. Free State Project. Retrieved 1 May 2022.
  230. Kirby, David; Ekins, Emily McClintock (6 August 2012). "Libertarian Roots of the Tea Party". Cato Institute. Archived from the original on 4 December 2018. Retrieved 7 June 2017.
  231. Brennan, Jason (2012). Libertarianism What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press. p. 142. Is the Tea Party libertarian? Overall, the Tea Party movement is not libertarian, though it has many libertarian elements, and many libertarians are Tea Partiers. They share the libertarian view that DC tends to be corrupt, and that Washington often promotes special interests at the expense of the common good. However, Tea Party members are predominantly populist, nationalist, social conservatives rather than libertarians. Polls indicate that most Tea Partiers believe government should have an active role in promoting traditional "family values" or conservative Judeo-Christian values. Many of them oppose free trade and open immigration. They tend to favor less government intervention in the domestic economy but more government intervention in international trade.
  232. Ekins, Emily (26 September 2011). "Is Half the Tea Party Libertarian?" Archived 11 May 2012 at the Wayback Machine Reason. 26 September 2011.
  233. Halloran, Liz (5 February 2010). "What's Behind The New Populism?". NPR. Archived from the original on 29 July 2018. Retrieved 4 April 2018.
  234. Barstow, David (16 February 2010). "Tea Party Lights Fuse for Rebellion on Right". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2 March 2017. Retrieved 19 February 2017.
  235. "How We Killed the Tea Party". Politico. 14 August 2016.
  236. Raimondo, Justin (6 November 2012). "Election 2012: Ron Paul's Revenge!" Archived 12 January 2013 at the Wayback Machine Antiwar.com. Retrieved 7 November 2012.
  237. Tuccile, J.D. (7 November 2012). "Gary Johnson Pulls One Million Votes, One Percent". Reason. Archived from the original on 9 November 2012. Retrieved 7 November 2012.
  238. "Libertarian Party buoyant; Greens hopeful". United Press International. Archived from the original on 18 February 2013. Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  239. Karoun Demirjian (5 October 2012). "Libertarian candidate makes push for Nevada's Ron Paul supporters". Las Vegas Sun. Archived from the original on 28 October 2012. Retrieved 2 November 2012.
  240. Lucas Eaves (1 November 2012). "Why 5% matters to Gary Johnson". Independent Voter Network. Archived from the original on 18 June 2013. Retrieved 6 November 2012.
  241. Texas Politics Today, 2013–2014 Edition – p. 121, William Maxwell, Ernest Crain, Adolfo Santos – 2013.
  242. "Official 2016 Presidential General Election Results" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. December 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 April 2019. Retrieved 30 December 2019.
  243. Doherty, Brian (29 May 2022). "Mises Caucus Takes Control of Libertarian Party". Reason. Retrieved 7 June 2022.
  244. Mas, Frederic (1 June 2022). "United States: the libertarian party veers to the right". Contrepoints (in French). Retrieved 7 June 2022.
  245. della Porta, Donatella; Diani, Mario, eds. (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements. Oxford University Press. p. 527. ISBN 978-0191667824. these militia organizations often revived long-since discarded state militia insignia and organization names while simultaneously aligning them with contemporary far-right libertarian politics (Crothers 2004).
  246. "Friedman and Freedom". Queen's Journal. Archived from the original on 11 August 2006. Retrieved 20 February 2008., Interview with Peter Jaworski. The Journal, Queen's University, March 15, 2002 – Issue 37, Volume 129
  247. ^ "Javier Milei at Cato Conference: "I'm a Liberal Libertarian … I Don't Believe Politicians Are Gods"". Cato Institute. 27 September 2024. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
  248. Belluck, Pam (27 October 2003). "Libertarians Pursue New Political Goal: State of Their Own". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 13 January 2022. Retrieved 26 May 2011.
  249. Elizabeth Hovde (11 May 2009). "Americans mixed on Obama's big government gamble". The Oregonian. Archived from the original on 21 October 2018. Retrieved 6 September 2010.
  250. Gairdner, William D. (2007) . The Trouble with Canada: A Citizen Speaks Out. Toronto: BPS Books. pp. 101–102. ISBN 978-0978440220. The first, we would call "libertarianism" today. Libertarians wanted to get all government out of people's lives. This movement is still very much alive today. In fact, in the United States, it is the third largest political party, and ran 125 candidates during the U.S. election of 1988.
  251. "August 2017 Ballot Access News Print Edition". ballot-access.org. 3 September 2017. Archived from the original on 7 January 2021. Retrieved 23 March 2019.
  252. Multiple citations:
  253. Fried, Barbara (2009). The Progressive Assault on Laissez Faire: Robert Hale and the First Law and Economics Movement. Harvard University Press. p. 50. ISBN 978-0674037304.
  254. Liu, Eric; Hanauer, Nick (7 May 2016). "Complexity Economics Shows Us Why Laissez-Faire Economics Always Fails" Archived 26 April 2018 at the Wayback Machine. Evonomics. Retrieved 10 February 2020.
  255. Matthew, Schneider-Mayerson (14 October 2015). Peak Oil: Apocalyptic Environmentalism and Libertarian Political Culture. Chicago. ISBN 978-0226285573. OCLC 922640625.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  256. MacLean, Nancy (2017). Democracy in Chains, The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-1101980965.

Bibliography

External links

Libertarianism
Origins
Schools
Libertarian capitalism
(Right-libertarianism)
Libertarian socialism
(Left-libertarianism)
Concepts
Philosophers
Left-wing
Right-wing
Other
Politicians
Issues
Works
Related
Links to related articles
Anarchism
Concepts
Issues
  • Animal rights
  • Capitalism
  • Education
  • Love and sex
  • Nationalism
  • Religion
  • Violence
  • Schools of thought
    Classical
  • Individualist
  • Mutualist
  • Social
  • Post-classical
    Contemporary
    Types of federation
    Economics
    Culture
  • A las Barricadas
  • Anarchist bookfair
  • Anarcho-punk
  • Arts
  • DIY ethic
  • Escuela Moderna
  • Films
  • Freeganism
  • Infoshop
  • Independent Media Center
  • The Internationale
  • Jewish anarchism
  • Lifestylism
  • May Day
  • "No gods, no masters"
  • Popular education
  • "Property is theft!"
  • Radical cheerleading
  • Radical environmentalism
  • Self-managed social center
  • Symbolism
  • History
  • French Revolution
  • Revolutions of 1848
  • Spanish Regional Federation of the IWA
  • Paris Commune
  • Hague Congress
  • Cantonal rebellion
  • Haymarket affair
  • International Conference of Rome
  • Trial of the Thirty
  • International Conference of Rome
  • Ferrer movement
  • Strandzha Commune
  • Congress of Amsterdam
  • Tragic Week
  • High Treason Incident
  • Manifesto of the Sixteen
  • German Revolution of 1918–1919
  • Bavarian Soviet Republic
  • 1919 United States bombings
  • Biennio Rosso
  • Kronstadt rebellion
  • Makhnovshchina
  • Amakasu Incident
  • Alt Llobregat insurrection
  • Anarchist insurrection of January 1933
  • Anarchist insurrection of December 1933
  • Spanish Revolution of 1936
  • Barcelona May Days
  • Red inverted triangle
  • Labadie Collection
  • Provo
  • May 1968
  • Kate Sharpley Library
  • Carnival Against Capital
  • 1999 Seattle WTO protests
  • Really Really Free Market
  • Occupy movement
  • People
  • Alston
  • Armand
  • Ba
  • Bakunin
  • Berkman
  • Bonanno
  • Bookchin
  • Bourdin
  • Chomsky
  • Cleyre
  • Day
  • Durruti
  • Ellul
  • Ervin
  • Faure
  • Fauset MacDonald
  • Ferrer
  • Feyerabend
  • Giovanni
  • Godwin
  • Goldman
  • González Prada
  • Graeber
  • Guillaume
  • He-Yin
  • Kanno
  • Kōtoku
  • Kropotkin
  • Landauer
  • Liu
  • Magón
  • Makhno
  • Maksimov
  • Malatesta
  • Mett
  • Michel
  • Most
  • Parsons
  • Pi i Margall
  • Pouget
  • Proudhon
  • Raichō
  • Reclus
  • Rocker
  • Santillán
  • Spooner
  • Stirner
  • Thoreau
  • Tolstoy
  • Tucker
  • Volin
  • Ward
  • Warren
  • Yarchuk
  • Zerzan
  • Lists
  • Anarcho-punk bands
  • Books
  • Fictional characters
  • Films
  • Jewish anarchists
  • Musicians
  • Periodicals
  • By region
  • Africa
  • Albania
  • Algeria
  • Andorra
  • Argentina
  • Armenia
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bangladesh
  • Belarus
  • Belgium
  • Bolivia
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Brazil
  • Bulgaria
  • Canada
  • Chile
  • China
  • Colombia
  • Costa Rica
  • Croatia
  • Cuba
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Denmark
  • Dominican Republic
  • East Timor
  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
  • El Salvador
  • Estonia
  • Finland
  • France
  • French Guiana
  • Georgia
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Guatemala
  • Hong Kong
  • Hungary
  • Iceland
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Iran
  • Ireland
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Latvia
  • Malaysia
  • Mexico
  • Monaco
  • Mongolia
  • Morocco
  • Netherlands
  • New Zealand
  • Nicaragua
  • Nigeria
  • Norway
  • Panama
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Philippines
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Puerto Rico
  • Romania
  • Russia
  • Serbia
  • Singapore
  • South Africa
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • Syria
  • Taiwan
  • Tunisia
  • Turkey
  • Ukraine
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • Uruguay
  • Venezuela
  • Vietnam
  • Related topics
  • Anti-corporatism
  • Anti-consumerism
  • Anti-fascism
  • Anti-globalization
  • Anti-statism
  • Anti-war movement
  • Autarchism
  • Autonomism
  • Communism
  • Definition of anarchism and libertarianism
  • Dual Power
  • Labour movement
  • Left communism
  • Left-libertarianism
  • Libertarianism
  • Libertarian socialism
  • Marxism
  • Relationship between Friedrich
    Nietzsche and Max Stirner
  • Situationist International
  • Socialism
  • Spontaneous order
  • flag Anarchism portal
  • Category
  • Outline
  • Liberalism
    Ideas
    Schools
    Classical
  • Economic
  • Equity feminism
  • Georgist
  • Radical
  • Whig
  • Physiocratic
  • Encyclopaedist
  • Conservative
    Social
    Other
    By region
    Africa
    Asia
    Europe
    Latin America and
    the Caribbean
    North America
    Oceania
    Philosophers
    Politicians
  • Jefferson
  • Kołłątaj
  • Madison
  • Artigas
  • Bolívar
  • Broglie
  • Lamartine
  • Macaulay
  • Kossuth
  • Deák
  • Cobden
  • Mazzini
  • Juárez
  • Lincoln
  • Gladstone
  • Cavour
  • Sarmiento
  • Mommsen
  • Naoroji
  • Itagaki
  • Levski
  • Kemal
  • Deakin
  • Milyukov
  • Lloyd George
  • Venizelos
  • Ståhlberg
  • Gokhale
  • Rathenau
  • Madero
  • Einaudi
  • King
  • Roosevelt
  • Pearson
  • Ohlin
  • Kennedy
  • Jenkins
  • Balcerowicz
  • Verhofstadt
  • Obama
  • Macron
  • Organisations
  • Africa Liberal Network
  • Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
  • Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party
  • Arab Liberal Federation
  • Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats
  • European Democratic Party
  • European Liberal Youth
  • International Alliance of Libertarian Parties
  • International Federation of Liberal Youth
  • Liberal International
  • Liberal Network for Latin America
  • Liberal parties
  • Liberal South East European Network
  • Related topics
  • Liberalism Portal
  • Libertarian socialism
    Schools
    of thought
    Concepts
    Models
    People
    19th c.
    20th c.
    Significant
    events
    Related
    Political ideologies
    See also
    Political philosophy
    Terms
    Government
    Ideologies
    Concepts
    Philosophers
    Antiquity
    Middle Ages
    Early modern
    period
    18th and 19th
    centuries
    20th and 21st
    centuries
    Works
    Related
    Worldview
    Related terms
    Aspects
    Biases
    Change and
    maintenance
    Culture
    Groupthink
    Knowledge
    Metaphysics
    Value
    Examples
    Attitudes
    Economic and
    political ideologies
    Religions
    Schools of
    philosophy
    Categories: