Revision as of 21:30, 10 July 2020 edit2001:2d8:e36f:ec23:199b:ec1:a86d:a3ad (talk)No edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:10, 30 December 2024 edit undo45.234.81.76 (talk) Moved Gasosaurus to satisfy the alphabetic orderTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||
(201 intermediate revisions by 92 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{pp- |
{{pp-pc1}} | ||
{{short description| |
{{short description|Extinct group of theropod dinosaurs}} | ||
{{Distinguish|Carnotaurus}} | |||
{{redirect|Carnosaur|the 1984 horror novel|Carnosaur (novel)|the 1993 film adaptation|Carnosaur (film)|the film series|Carnosaur (series)}} | {{redirect|Carnosaur|the 1984 horror novel|Carnosaur (novel)|the 1993 film adaptation|Carnosaur (film)|the film series|Carnosaur (series)}} | ||
{{Automatic taxobox | {{Automatic taxobox | ||
| name = Carnosaurs | | name = Carnosaurs | ||
| fossil_range = <br/>]–], {{Fossil range| |
| fossil_range = <br/>] – ], {{Fossil range|earliest=179|174|89|latest=66}} Possible ] and ] records. | ||
| image = |
| image = Carnosauria (sensu stricto) Infobox Panoply.png | ||
| image_caption = |
| image_caption = Four carnosaurs (top to bottom): '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'' | ||
| image_upright = 1.3 | |||
| taxon = Carnosauria | | taxon = Carnosauria | ||
| authority = ], 1920 | | authority = ], 1920 | ||
| subdivision_ranks = Subgroups | | subdivision_ranks = Subgroups | ||
| subdivision = | | subdivision = | ||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | *{{extinct}}'']''? | ||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | *{{extinct}}'']''? | ||
*{{extinct}}] | *{{extinct}}'']''? | ||
*{{extinct}}] |
*{{extinct}}'']''? | ||
*{{extinct}}''']'''? <small>(possibly ])</small> | |||
*{{extinct}}'''Allosauroidea''' <small>Marsh, 1878</small> | |||
**{{extinct}}] | **{{extinct}}'']'' | ||
**{{extinct}}] | **{{extinct}}'']'' | ||
**{{extinct}}'']''? | |||
**{{extinct}}'']''? | |||
**{{extinct}}'']''? | |||
**{{extinct}}''']''' | |||
**{{extinct}}'''Allosauria''' <small>Paul, 1988</small> | |||
***{{extinct}}''']''' | |||
***{{extinct}}'''Carcharodontosauria''' <small>Benson, Carrano and Brusatte, 2010</small> | |||
****{{extinct}}'']''? | |||
****{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
****{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
****{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
****{{extinct}}'']''? | |||
****{{extinct}}''']''' | |||
{{Collapse top|title=Uncertain or possible members |left=yes|padding=0|border=0|border2=0|bg=clear|bg2=clear}} | |||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
*{{extinct}}'']'' | |||
*{{extinct}}''']''' | |||
{{Collapse bottom}} | |||
| synonyms = '''Allosauroidea'''? <small>Marsh, 1878</small> | |||
}} | }} | ||
'''Carnosauria''' is an extinct group of ] theropod ]s that lived during the ] and ] periods. | |||
{{Portal|Dinosaurs}} | |||
'''Carnosauria''' is a large group of ]y ]s that lived during the ] and ] periods. While it originally contained a wide assortment of giant ]s that were not closely related, the group has since been defined to encompass only the ] and their closest kin, however, in 2019, with the description and publication of '']'', a basal allosauroid curiously displaying both primitive and derived features seen in ], the new phylogenetic analysis has found ] to be a basal ] of carnosaurs in respect to Allosauroidea thus significantly expanding Carnosauria's inclusiveness towards its original context. Starting from the 1990s, scientists have discovered some very large carnosaurs in the ] family, such as '']'' and '']'' which are among the largest known predatory dinosaurs. | |||
While Carnosauria was historically considered largely synonymous with '''Allosauroidea''', some recent studies have revived Carnosauria as ] including both Allosauroidea and ] (which is sometimes recovered as ] with respect to Allosauroidea), and thus including the majority of non-] members of theropod clade ].<ref name="Rauhut2019" /> Other researchers have found Allosauroidea and Megalosauroidea to be unrelated groups.<ref name=":10">Cau A. (2024). . Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 63(1): 1-19.</ref> | |||
Distinctive characteristics of carnosaurs include large eyes, a long narrow ] and modifications of the ]s and ] such as the thigh (]) being longer than the shin (]). | |||
Distinctive characteristics of carnosaurs include large ]s, a long narrow ] and modifications of the ]s and ] such as the thigh (]) being longer than the shin (]).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/saurischia/carnosauria.html|title=Tremble Before the Carnosauria!|website=University of California Museum of Paleontology|last=Hutchinson|first=John R.|date=7 November 2005|orig-date=Originally published 11 November 1995|editor-last=Smith|editor-first=Dave|access-date=5 March 2024}}</ref> | |||
Carnosaurs first appeared in the Middle Jurassic, around 176 mya. The last definite known carnosaurs, the carcharodontosaurs, became extinct in the ] epoch of the Cretaceous, roughly 90 mya; reportedly later remains of carcharodontosaurids, from the ] and ] epochs, are possibly misidentified remains of ].<ref name="2017brazicarch">{{cite journal | last1 = Delcourt | first1 = R. | last2 = Grillo | first2 = O.N. | title = Carcharodontosaurids remained extinct in the Campanian-Maastrichtian: Reassessment of a fragmentary maxilla from Presidente Prudente Formation, Brazil | journal = Cretaceous Research | volume = 84 | pages = 515–524 | date = 2017 | doi = 10.1016/j.cretres.2017.09.008 }}</ref> The phylogenetically problematic ]ns, which may not be carnosaurs, became extinct around 84 mya. Remains probably belonging to ]s have been found from the late ] | |||
(70–66 Ma ago) in ].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Fernandes de Azevedo|first1=R. P.|last2=Simbras|first2=F. M.|last3=Furtado|first3=M. R.|last4=Candeiro|first4=C. R. A.|last5=Bergqvist|first5=L. P.|title=First Brazilian carcharodontosaurid and other new theropod dinosaur fossils from the Campanian–Maastrichtian Presidente Prudente Formation, São Paulo State, southeastern Brazil|journal=Cretaceous Research|date=2013|volume=40|pages=131–142|doi=10.1016/j.cretres.2012.06.004}}</ref> | |||
Carnosaurs first appeared in the Middle Jurassic, around 176 mya. The last definite known carnosaurs, the ], became extinct in the ] epoch of the Cretaceous, roughly 90 mya; reportedly later remains of carcharodontosaurids, from the late ] (70–66 mya) ] in ], were later interpreted as those of ].<ref name="2017brazicarch">{{cite journal | last1 = Delcourt | first1 = R. | last2 = Grillo | first2 = O.N. | title = Carcharodontosaurids remained extinct in the Campanian-Maastrichtian: Reassessment of a fragmentary maxilla from Presidente Prudente Formation, Brazil | journal = Cretaceous Research | volume = 84 | pages = 515–524 | date = 2017 | doi = 10.1016/j.cretres.2017.09.008 }}</ref> The phylogenetically problematic ]ns, which may or may not be carnosaurs, became extinct around 66 mya.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Fernandes de Azevedo|first1=R. P.|last2=Simbras|first2=F. M.|last3=Furtado|first3=M. R.|last4=Candeiro|first4=C. R. A.|last5=Bergqvist|first5=L. P.|date=2013|title=First Brazilian carcharodontosaurid and other new theropod dinosaur fossils from the Campanian–Maastrichtian Presidente Prudente Formation, São Paulo State, southeastern Brazil|journal=Cretaceous Research|volume=40|pages=131–142|doi=10.1016/j.cretres.2012.06.004|bibcode=2013CrRes..40..131F }}</ref> '']'', discovered in rocks dated to 75-70 mya,<ref name="novas&agnolin2004">Novas and Agnolin, (2004). "''Unquillosaurus ceibalii'' Powell, a giant maniraptoran (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Late Cretaceous of Argentina." ''Rev. Mus. Argentino Cienc. Nat.'', n.s. '''6'''(1): 61-66.</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Matthew |first1=Carrano |title=The phylogeny of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |year=2012 |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=211–300 |doi=10.1080/14772019.2011.630927 |bibcode=2012JSPal..10..211C |s2cid=85354215 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230808558}}</ref> might potentially also be a carnosaur. | |||
==Systematics== | |||
Modern ] analysis defines Carnosauria as those ] sharing a more recent common ancestor with '']'' than with modern birds.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.miketaylor.org.uk/dino/faq/s-class/phyletic/index.html|title=What do terms like monophyletic, paraphyletic and polyphyletic mean?}}</ref> | |||
==History of study== | |||
===Taxonomy=== | |||
Carnosauria has traditionally been used as a dumping ground for all large theropods. Even non-dinosaurs, such as the ]n '']'', were once considered carnosaurs. However, analysis in the 1980s and 1990s revealed that other than size, the group shared very few characteristics, making it ]. Most former carnosaurs (such as the ]s, the ]s, and the ]s) were ] as more primitive theropods. Others (such as the ]s) that were more closely related to birds were placed in ]. | Carnosauria has traditionally been used as a dumping ground for all large theropods. Even non-dinosaurs, such as the ]n '']'', were once considered carnosaurs. However, analysis in the 1980s and 1990s revealed that other than size, the group shared very few characteristics, making it ]. Most former carnosaurs (such as the ]s, the ]s, and the ]s) were ] as more primitive theropods. Others (such as the ]s) that were more closely related to birds were placed in ]. Modern ] analysis defines Carnosauria as those ] sharing a more recent common ancestor with '']'' than with modern birds.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.miketaylor.org.uk/dino/faq/s-class/phyletic/index.html|title=What do terms like monophyletic, paraphyletic and polyphyletic mean?}}</ref> | ||
== |
== Anatomy == | ||
] | |||
The ] Allosauroidea was originally proposed by ] and Zhao (1993; p. 2079), and later used as an undefined ] by ] (1997). Sereno (1998; p. 64) was the first to provide a stem-based definition for the Allosauroidea, defining the clade as "All neotetanurans closer to ''Allosaurus'' than to ]." ] (2007) used a node-based definition, defined the Allosauroidea as ''Allosaurus'', '']'', their ], and all of its descendants. ] and colleagues (2004; p. 100) and ] and ] (2000), among others, have followed this node-based definition. However, in some analyses (such as Currie & Carpenter, 2000), the placement of the carcharodontosaurids relative to the allosaurids and sinraptorids is uncertain, and therefore it is uncertain whether or not they are allosauroids (Currie & Carpenter, 2000). | |||
Carnosaurs share certain distinctive features, one of which is a triangular-shaped ].<ref name=holtz1998>{{Cite journal|last=Holtz|first=Thomas|date=December 1998|title=A New Phylogeny of the Carnivorous Dinosaurs|journal=Gaia|volume=15|pages=5–61|citeseerx=10.1.1.211.3044}}</ref> They also have 3 fingers per hand, with the second and third digit being approximately equal in length. The femur is larger than the tibia. Another defining feature of carnosaurs is that the ] bases on their tails have anterior and posterior bone growth.<ref>Mateus, Octávio. (1997). Lourinhanosaurus antunesi, A New Upper Jurassic Allosauroid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from Lourinhã, Portugal. Mémorias da Academia Ciêncas de Lisboa. 37.</ref> The largest carnosaurs can reach up to 10 meters in length. The length of the body from the tail to the hip is between 54% and 62% of the total body length, and the length of the body from the head to the hip is between 38% and 46% of the total body length.<ref name=batesetal2012>{{cite journal |last1=Bates |first1=Karl T. |last2=Benson |first2=Roger B. J. |last3=Falkingham |first3=Peter L. |title=A computational analysis of locomotor anatomy and body mass evolution in Allosauroidea (Dinosauria: Theropoda) |journal=Paleobiology |date=1 June 2012 |volume=38 |issue=3 |pages=486–507 |doi=10.1666/10004.1 |bibcode=2012Pbio...38..486B |s2cid=86326069 }}</ref> Carnosaurs scaled their limbs relative to their body in a way similar to how other large theropods, like the ], did.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bybee |first1=Paul J. |last2=Lee |first2=Andrew H. |last3=Lamm |first3=Ellen-Thérèse |title=Sizing the Jurassic theropod dinosaur Allosaurus: Assessing growth strategy and evolution of ontogenetic scaling of limbs |journal=Journal of Morphology |year=2006 |volume=267 |issue=3 |pages=347–359 |doi=10.1002/jmor.10406 |pmid=16380967 |s2cid=35111050 }}</ref> During the Cretaceous, some carnosaurs grew to sizes similar to those of the largest tyrannosaurids.<ref name=":4" /> These large carnosaurs lived in the same time period as the other large theropods found in the upper Morrison and Tendaguru formations.<ref name=":3" /> | |||
Carnosaurs maintained a similar ] across all sizes, which is found to be between 37% and 58% of the femoral length anterior to the hip. Other similarities across all carnosaurs include the structure of their hind limb and pelvis. The pelvis in particular is thought to be designed to reduce stress regardless of body size. In particular, the way the femur is inclined reduces the bending and torsion stress. Furthermore, like other animals with tails, carnosaurs possess a ] longus (CFL) muscle that allowed them to flex theirs. Larger carnosaurs are found to have a lower CFL muscle-to-body-mass proportion that smaller carnosaurs.<ref name=batesetal2012 /> | |||
The ] presented here follows the 2010 analysis by Benson, Carrano and Brusatte.<ref name=bensonetal2010>{{cite journal | last1 = Benson | first1 = R.B.J. | last2 = Carrano | first2 = M.T | last3 = Brusatte | first3 = S.L. | year = 2010 | title = A new clade of archaic large-bodied predatory dinosaurs (Theropoda: Allosauroidea) that survived to the latest Mesozoic | url = | journal = Naturwissenschaften | volume = 97 | issue = 1| pages = 71–78 | doi = 10.1007/s00114-009-0614-x | pmid=19826771 | bibcode=2010NW.....97...71B}}</ref> | |||
In addition to body similarities, most carnosaurs, especially most allosauroids are also united by certain skull features. Some of the defining ones include a smaller ] ], a short ] bone, and a short connection between the braincase and the palate.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sereno |first1=P. C. |last2=Dutheil |first2=D. B. |last3=Iarochene |first3=M. |last4=Larsson |first4=H. C. E. |last5=Lyon |first5=G. H. |last6=Magwene |first6=P. M. |last7=Sidor |first7=C. A. |last8=Varricchio |first8=D. J. |last9=Wilson |first9=J. A. |title=Predatory Dinosaurs from the Sahara and Late Cretaceous Faunal Differentiation |journal=Science |date=17 May 1996 |volume=272 |issue=5264 |pages=986–991 |doi=10.1126/science.272.5264.986 |pmid=8662584 |bibcode=1996Sci...272..986S |s2cid=39658297 |url=http://doc.rero.ch/record/13893/files/PAL_E831.pdf }}</ref> Allosauroid skulls are about 2.5 to 3 times longer as they are tall.<ref name=":3">{{cite journal |last1=Carrano |first1=Matthew T. |last2=Benson |first2=Roger B. J. |last3=Sampson |first3=Scott D. |title=The phylogeny of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |year=2012 |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=211–300 |doi=10.1080/14772019.2011.630927 |bibcode=2012JSPal..10..211C |s2cid=85354215 }}</ref> Their narrow skull along with their serrated teeth allow carnosaurs to better slice flesh off of their prey. Carnosaur teeth are flat and have equally-sized ] on both edges. The flat side of the tooth face the sides of the skull, while the edges align on the same plane as the skull.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Infante |first1=P. |last2=Canudo |first2=José Ignacio |last3=Ruiz Omeñaca |first3=José Ignacio |title=Primera evidencia de dinosaurios terópodos en la Formación Mirambel (Barremiense inferior, Cretácico Inferior) en Castellote, Teruel |trans-title=First evidence of theropod dinosaurs from the Mirambel Formation (Lower Barremian, Lower Cretaceous) from Castellote, Terue |language=es |journal=Geogaceta |date=2005 |volume=38 |hdl=10272/8751 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> From analyzing the skull of different carnosaurs, the volume of the ] ranges between 95 milliliters in ''Sinraptor'' to 250 milliliters in ''Giganotosaurus''.<ref>Paulina-Carabajal, Ariana & Currie, Philip. (2012). New information on the braincase and endocast of Sinraptor dongi (Theropoda: Allosauroidea): Ethmoidal region, endocranial anatomy and pneumaticity. Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 50. 85-101.</ref> | |||
{{clade| style=font-size:100%;line-height:80% | |||
''Allosaurus'' and '']'' preserve skin impressions showing their ]. In ''Allosaurus,'' skin impressions showing small ] measuring 1-3 mm are known from the side of the torso and the ]. Another skin impression from the ventral side of the neck preserves broad scutate scales. An impression from the base of the tail preserves larger scales around 2 cm in diameter. However, it has been noted that these may be ] scales due to their similarity and the fact that non-theropod remains were discovered associated with the tail of this particular ''Allosaurus'' specimen.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hendrickx |first1=Christophe |last2=Bell |first2=Phil R. |last3=Pittman |first3=Michael |last4=Milner |first4=Andrew R. C. |last5=Cuesta |first5=Elena |last6=O'Connor |first6=Jingmai |last7=Loewen |first7=Mark |last8=Currie |first8=Philip J. |last9=Mateus |first9=Octávio |last10=Kaye |first10=Thomas G. |last11=Delcourt |first11=Rafael |date=June 2022 |title=Morphology and distribution of scales, dermal ossifications, and other non-feather integumentary structures in non-avialan theropod dinosaurs |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.12829 |journal=Biological Reviews |language=en |volume=97 |issue=3 |pages=960–1004 |doi=10.1111/brv.12829 |pmid=34991180 |issn=1464-7931}}</ref> ''Concavenator'' preserves rectangular scutate scales on the underside of the tail, as well as scutate scales on the feet along with small scales. A series of knobs on the ] of ''Concavenator'' have been interpreted by some authors as quill knobs theorized to have supported primitive quills;<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ortega |first1=Francisco |last2=Escaso |first2=Fernando |last3=Sanz |first3=José L. |date=September 2010 |title=A bizarre, humped Carcharodontosauria (Theropoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of Spain |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09181 |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=467 |issue=7312 |pages=203–206 |doi=10.1038/nature09181 |pmid=20829793 |bibcode=2010Natur.467..203O |issn=1476-4687}}</ref> however this interpretation has been questioned, and they have been suggested to represent traces of ligaments instead.<ref>{{Citation |last1=Rauhut |first1=Oliver W. M. |title=The Origin of Birds: Current Consensus, Controversy, and the Occurrence of Feathers |date=2020 |work=The Evolution of Feathers: From Their Origin to the Present |pages=27–45 |editor-last=Foth |editor-first=Christian |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27223-4_3 |access-date=2024-03-01 |series=Fascinating Life Sciences |place=Cham |publisher=Springer International Publishing |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-030-27223-4_3 |isbn=978-3-030-27223-4 |last2=Foth |first2=Christian |editor2-last=Rauhut |editor2-first=Oliver W. M.}}</ref> | |||
==Classification== | |||
] | |||
Within Carnosauria, there is a slightly more exclusive clade, '''Allosauroidea'''. The ] Allosauroidea was originally named by ], but it was given a formal definition by ] and Zhao, and later used as a ] by ] in 1997.<ref name=curriezhao>{{cite journal | last1 = Currie | first1 = P. J. | last2 = Zhao | first2 = X. | year = 1993 | title = A new carnosaur (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Upper Jurassic of Xinjiang, People's Republic of China | journal = Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences | volume = 30 | issue = 10| pages = 2037–2081 | doi = 10.1139/e93-179 | bibcode = 1993CaJES..30.2037C | url = http://doc.rero.ch/record/14267/files/PAL_E1384.pdf }}</ref> Sereno was the first to provide a stem-based definition for the Allosauroidea in 1998, defining the clade as "All neotetanurans closer to '']'' than to ]."<ref name=serenodefinition>{{cite journal | last1 = Sereno | first1 = P. C. | year = 1997 | title = The origin and evolution of dinosaurs | journal = Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences | volume = 25 | pages = 435–489 | doi = 10.1146/annurev.earth.25.1.435 | bibcode = 1997AREPS..25..435S | url = http://doc.rero.ch/record/15399/files/PAL_E2750.pdf }}</ref> ] used a node-based definition in his 2007 study which defined the Allosauroidea as ''Allosaurus'', '']'', their ], and all of its descendants. ] and colleagues and ] and ], among others, have followed this node-based definition.<ref name=thedinosauria>Holtz, T. R., Jr. and Osmólska H. 2004. Saurischia; pp. 21–24 in D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, and H. Osmólska (eds.), ''The Dinosauria'' (2nd ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley.</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Currie |first1=Philip J. |last2=Carpenter |first2=Kenneth |date=2000 |title=A new specimen of ''Acrocanthosaurus atokensis'' (Theropoda, Dinosauria) from the Lower Cretaceous Antlers Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Aptian) of Oklahoma, USA |url=https://doc.rero.ch/record/15112/files/PAL_E2381.pdf |journal=Publications Scientifiques du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris |volume=22 |issue=2 |pages=207–246}}</ref> Depending on the study, Carnosauria and Allosauroidea are sometimes considered synonymous. In such cases, several researchers have elected to use Allosauroidea over Carnosauria.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=bensonetal2010>{{cite journal | last1 = Benson | first1 = R.B.J. | last2 = Carrano | first2 = M.T | last3 = Brusatte | first3 = S.L. | year = 2010 | title = A new clade of archaic large-bodied predatory dinosaurs (Theropoda: Allosauroidea) that survived to the latest Mesozoic | journal = Naturwissenschaften | volume = 97 | issue = 1| pages = 71–78 | doi = 10.1007/s00114-009-0614-x | pmid=19826771 | bibcode=2010NW.....97...71B| s2cid = 22646156 }}</ref> | |||
===Conventional phylogeny=== | |||
The following family tree illustrates the position of Carnosauria within Theropoda. It is a simplified version of the tree presented in a synthesis of the relationships of the major theropod groups based on various studies conducted in the 2010s.<ref name=theropodphylogeny2015>{{cite journal | last1 = Hendrickx | first1 = C. | last2 = Hartman | first2 = S.A. | last3 = Mateus | first3 = O. | year = 2015 | title = An overview of non-avian theropod discoveries and classification | journal = PalArch's Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology | volume = 12 | issue = 1 | pages = 1–73 }}</ref> | |||
{{clade |style=line-height:75%; | |||
|label1=''']''' | |||
|1={{clade | |||
|1=] ] | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1=] ] | |||
|label2=] | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1=] ] | |||
|label2=] | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1=] ] | |||
|label2=] | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1='''Carnosauria''' / '''Allosauroidea''' ] | |||
|label2=] | |||
|2={{clade sequential | |||
|1=] ] | |||
|2=] ] | |||
|3=] <div style="{{mirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
|4=] ] | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
}} }} | |||
}} | |||
The ] presented below illustrates the interrelationships between the four major groups (or families) of carnosaurs. It is a simplified version of the tree presented in the 2012 analysis by Carrano, Benson and Sampson after they excluded three "wildcard" taxa '']'', '']'', and '']''.<ref name=":3" /> | |||
{{clade| style=font-size:100%;line-height:85% | |||
|label1='''Allosauroidea''' | |||
|1={{clade | |||
|label1= | |||
|1=]] | |||
|label2='''Allosauria''' | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|label1= | |||
|1=]] | |||
|label2='''Carcharodontosauria''' | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|label1= | |||
|1=] <div style="{{MirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
|label2= | |||
|2=]<div style="{{MirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
}} }} }} }} | |||
===Alternative hypotheses=== | |||
The composition of the clade Carnosauria has been controversial among scientists since at least ]. Different clades have been recovered by different authors, and a scientific consensus has yet to emerge. | |||
One such clade is '''Neovenatoridae''', a proposed clade of ] carnosaurs uniting some primitive members of the group such as '']'' with the ], a group of theropods with controversial affinities. Other studies recover megaraptorans as basal ] unrelated to carcharodontosaurs. Other theropods with uncertain affinities such as '']'', '']'' and '']'' are also sometimes included.<ref name="murusraptor">{{Cite journal |last1=Coria |first1=Rodolfo A. |last2=Currie |first2=Philip J. |date=20 July 2016 |title=A New Megaraptoran Dinosaur (Dinosauria, Theropoda, Megaraptoridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=11 |issue=7 |pages=e0157973 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0157973 |issn=1932-6203| pmid=27439002 | pmc=4954680|bibcode=2016PLoSO..1157973C |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Méndez |first1=Ariel H. |last2=Novas |first2=Fernando E. |last3=Iori |first3=Fabiano V. |date=May–June 2012 |title=Premier enregistrement de Megaraptora (Theropoda, Neovenatoridae) au Brésil |trans-title=First record of Megaraptora (Theropoda, Neovenatoridae) from Brazil |journal=Comptes Rendus Palevol |language=en |volume=11 |issue=4 |pages=251–256 |doi=10.1016/j.crpv.2011.12.007 |hdl=11336/19445 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> | |||
Neovenatoridae, as formulated by these authors, contained ''Neovenator'', ''Chilantaisaurus'', and a newly named clade: Megaraptora. Megaraptora contained ''Megaraptor'', ''Fukuiraptor'', ''Orkoraptor'', ''Aerosteon'', and ''Australovenator''. These genera were allied with the other neovenatorids on the basis of several features spread out throughout the skeleton, particularly the large amount of pneumatization present. The pneumatic ilium of ''Aerosteon'' was particularly notable, as ''Neovenator'' was the only other taxon known to have that trait at the time. Neovenatorids were envisioned as the latest-surviving allosauroids, which were able to persist well into the Late Cretaceous due to their low profile and coelurosaur-like adaptations.<ref name=bensonetal2010 /> Later studies supported this hypothesis, such as Carrano, Benson & Sampson large study of tetanuran relationships in 2012,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Carrano |first1=Matthew T. |last2=Benson |first2=Roger B. J. |last3=Sampson |first3=Scott D. |date=1 June 2012 |title=The phylogeny of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=211–300 |doi=10.1080/14772019.2011.630927 |bibcode=2012JSPal..10..211C |s2cid=85354215 |issn=1477-2019}}</ref> and Zanno & Makovicky description of the newly discovered theropod '']'' in 2013, which they placed within Megaraptora. ''Fukuiraptor'' and ''Australovenator'' were consistently found to be close relatives of each other; this was also the case for ''Aerosteon'' and ''Megaraptor''. ''Orkoraptor'' was a ] taxon difficult to place with certainty.<ref name=Siats>{{Cite journal | last1 = Zanno | first1 = L. E. | last2 = Makovicky | first2 = P. J. | doi = 10.1038/ncomms3827 | title = Neovenatorid theropods are apex predators in the Late Cretaceous of North America | journal = Nature Communications | volume = 4 | pages = 2827 | year = 2013 | pmid = 24264527| bibcode = 2013NatCo...4.2827Z | doi-access = free }}</ref> | |||
Phylogenetic studies conducted by Benson, Carrano and Brusatte (2010) and Carrano, Benson and Sampson (2012) recovered the group ] and a few other taxa as members of the Neovenatoridae. This would make neovenatorids the latest-surviving allosauroids; at least one megaraptoran, '']'', lived near the end of the ] era, dating to the early ] stage of the latest ] period, about 70 million years ago.<ref name=bensonetal2010 /><ref name=":3" /> | |||
The cladogram below follows a 2016 analysis by Sebastián Apesteguía, Nathan D. Smith, Rubén Juarez Valieri, and Peter J. Makovicky based on the dataset of Carrano ''et al.'' (2012).<ref name="Apesteguía2016">{{cite journal |author1=Sebastián Apesteguía |author2=Nathan D. Smith |author3=Rubén Juárez Valieri |author4=Peter J. Makovicky |year=2016 |title=An Unusual New Theropod with a Didactyl Manus from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=11 |issue=7 |pages=e0157793 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0157793 |pmid=27410683 |pmc=4943716|bibcode=2016PLoSO..1157793A |doi-access=free }}</ref> | |||
{{clade| style=font-size:80%;line-height:85% | |||
|label1='''Allosauroidea''' | |label1='''Allosauroidea''' | ||
|1={{clade | |1={{clade | ||
|1=] ] | |||
|label2= | |label2='''Allosauria''' | ||
|2={{clade | |2={{clade | ||
|1= |
|1=] ] | ||
|label2='''Carcharodontosauria''' | |label2='''Carcharodontosauria''' | ||
|2={{clade | |2={{clade | ||
|1=]] | |1=] ] | ||
| |
|label2='''Neovenatoridae''' | ||
|
|2={{clade | ||
|
|1={{clade | ||
|1='']'' | |||
}} | |||
|2='']'' }} | |||
}} | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1='']'' <div style="{{mirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1='']'' <div style="{{mirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
|2=] <div style="{{mirrorH}}">]</div> }} }} }} }} }} }} }} | |||
Subsequent analyses have contradicted the above hypothesis. Novas and colleagues conducted an analysis in 2012 which found that '']'' was closely related to carcharodontosaurids, simultaneously found '']'' and related genera to be ] closely related to ].<ref>{{cite journal |author1=F. E. Novas |author2=F. L. Agnolín |author3=M. D. Ezcurra |author4=J. I. Canale |author5=J. D. Porfiri | year= 2012 | title=Megaraptorans as members of an unexpected evolutionary radiation of tyrant-reptiles in Gondwana | url=http://www.ameghiniana.org.ar/index.php/ameghiniana/article/view/868/1618 | journal=Ameghiniana | volume=49 | issue=Suppl | pages=R33 }}</ref> However, Novas ''et al.'' subsequently found that megaraptorans lacked most of the key features in the hands of derived coelurosaurs including '']'' and '']''. Instead, their hands retain a number of primitive characteristics seen in basal tetanurans such as '']''. Nevertheless, there are still a number of other traits that support megaraptorans as members of the Coelurosauria.<ref name=novasetal2016>{{cite journal | last1 = Novas | first1 = F.E. | last2 = Rolando | first2 = A.M.A. | last3 = Agnolin | first3 = F.L. | date = 2016 | url = https://museumvictoria.com.au/pages/381424/049-061_MMV74_Novas_4_WEB.pdf | title = Phylogenetic relationships of the Cretaceous Gondwanan theropods ''Megaraptor'' and ''Australovenator'': the evidence afforded by their manual anatomy. | journal = Memoirs of Museum Victoria | volume = 74 | pages = 49–61 | doi = 10.24199/j.mmv.2016.74.05 | url-status = dead | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160818172356/https://museumvictoria.com.au/pages/381424/049-061_MMV74_Novas_4_WEB.pdf | archive-date = 2016-08-18 | hdl = 11336/48895 | hdl-access = free }}</ref><ref name=eotyrannus>{{cite journal |last1=Naish |first1=D. |last2=Cau |first2=A. |date=July 2022 |title=The osteology and affinities of ''Eotyrannus lengi'', a tyrannosauroid theropod from the Wealden Supergroup of southern England |journal=PeerJ |volume=10 |pages=e12727≠ |doi=10.7717/peerj.12727|pmid=35821895 |pmc=9271276 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Other taxa like ''Deltadromeus'' and ''Gualicho'' have been alternatively recovered as coelurosaurs or ] ].<ref name="Apesteguía2016" /><ref name=cau2024 /> | |||
Several recent analyses do not find a relationship between ''Neovenator'' and megaraptorans, which suggests that the latter were not carnosaurs or allosauroids. As a result of these findings, and the fact that ''Neovenator'' itself is the only uncontroversial neovenatorid, the family Neovenatoridae sees little use in recent publications.<ref name="sciencedirect.com">{{cite journal | doi = 10.1016/j.cretres.2013.04.001 | title=Evolution of the carnivorous dinosaurs during the Cretaceous: The evidence from Patagonia | journal=Cretaceous Research | date=2013 | volume=45 | pages=174–215 | first=Fernando E. | last=Novas| bibcode=2013CrRes..45..174N | hdl=11336/102037 | hdl-access=free }}</ref><ref name=eotyrannus /><ref name=cau2024>{{Cite journal |last=Cau |first=Andrea |date=2024 |title=A Unified Framework for Predatory Dinosaur Macroevolution |url=https://doi.org/10.4435/BSPI.2024.08 |journal=Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana |volume=63 |issue=1 |pages=1–19 |doi=10.4435/BSPI.2024.08 |doi-broken-date=2024-11-20 |issn=0375-7633}}</ref> | |||
In 2019 saw the description and publication of '']'', a basal allosauroid that curiously has characteristics displaying primitive and derived features seen in ]. Their phylogenetic analysis has found ] to be a basal grade of carnosaurs in respect to Allosauroidea.<ref name="Rauhut2019">{{Cite journal|last=Rauhut|first=Oliver W. M.|last2=Pol|first2=Diego|date=2019-12-11|title=Probable basal allosauroid from the early Middle Jurassic Cañadón Asfalto Formation of Argentina highlights phylogenetic uncertainty in tetanuran theropod dinosaurs|journal=Scientific Reports|language=en|volume=9|issue=1|pages=18826|doi=10.1038/s41598-019-53672-7|pmid=31827108|pmc=6906444|issn=2045-2322}}</ref> | |||
In 2019, Rauhut and Pol described '']'', a basal allosauroid displaying a mosaic of primitive and derived features seen within ]. Their phylogenetic analysis found traditional ] to represent a basal ] of carnosaurs, ] with respect to Allosauroidea. Because the authors amended the definition of Allosauroidea to include all theropods that are closer to ''Allosaurus fragilis'' than to either ''] bucklandii'' or Neornithes, the ] was found to fall within Allosauroidea. A cladogram displaying the relationships they recovered is shown below.<ref name="Rauhut2019">{{cite journal |last1=Rauhut |first1=Oliver W. M. |last2=Pol |first2=Diego |title=Probable basal allosauroid from the early Middle Jurassic Cañadón Asfalto Formation of Argentina highlights phylogenetic uncertainty in tetanuran theropod dinosaurs |journal=Scientific Reports |date=11 December 2019 |volume=9 |issue=1 |page=18826 |doi=10.1038/s41598-019-53672-7 |pmid=31827108 |pmc=6906444 |bibcode=2019NatSR...918826R }}</ref> | |||
{{clade| style=font-size:100%;line-height:80% | |||
{{clade| style=font-size:80%;line-height:85% | |||
|label1=] | |||
|label1='''Carnosauria''' | |||
|1={{clade | |1={{clade | ||
|1='']'' | |||
|1=]] | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1=] ] | |||
|2={{clade | |2={{clade | ||
|1=]] | |1=] ] | ||
|label2= |
|label2='''Allosauroidea''' | ||
|2={{clade | |2={{clade | ||
|1='']'' | |||
|1=] ] | |||
|2={{clade | |2={{clade | ||
|1=] ] | |||
|1={{clade | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1='']'' | |||
|2={{clade | |2={{clade | ||
|1=]] | |1=]] | ||
|2={{clade | |2={{clade | ||
| |
|1=]] | ||
|2=]<div style="{{mirrorH}}">]</div>}} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} | |||
|1={{clade | |||
The relationship between allosauroids and megalosauroids was also supported by a provisional analysis published by ] in 2021. This publication is also the origin of the hypothesis that several "compsognathids" from Europe may have been juvenile carnosaurs. The results of this analysis differ from those of Rauhut and Pol in that Cau finds Megalosauroidea to be ] and the sister-taxon of Allosauroidea within Carnosauria. An abbreviated version of this phylogeny is shown below.<ref name="Cau2021">{{Cite journal| volume = 152| pages = 81–95| last = Cau| first = Andrea| title = Comments on the Mesozoic theropod dinosaurs from Italy| journal = Atti della Società dei Naturalisti e Matematici di Modena| date = 2021 | url = https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354418322}}</ref> | |||
|1=]] | |||
{{clade| style=font-size:80%;line-height:85% | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|label1=''']''' | |||
|label1=] | |||
|1={{clade | |||
|1=] ] | |||
|1=]] | |||
|label2='''Carnosauria''' | |||
|2=]]}} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|label1='''Allosauroidea''' | |||
|1={{clade | |||
|1='']'' | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1=] ] | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1='']'' ] | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1='']'' | |||
|2=] <div style="{{mirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
}} }} }} }} | |||
|label2=] | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1={{clade | |||
|1='']'' | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1='']'' | |||
|2='']'' | |||
}} }} | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1=] ] | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1=] ] | |||
|2=] ] | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
In 2024, Andrea Cau published a paper which presented an analysis of theropod ontogeny which suggested that several theropods that were traditionally considered ]s may be juvenile allosauroids or megalosauroids. These included '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']''. This hypothesis has not been universally accepted, and it notably conflicts with Cau's 2021 publication by finding Megalosauroidea as monophyletic and the sister taxon of ], a grouping which includes both carnosaurs (or allosauroids) and coelurosaurs. Notably, this analysis also treats the ] genus '']'' as a ] and suggests that the postcranial remains of this taxon belong to a carnosaur (possibly '']''). An abbreviated version of the cladogram from that analysis is shown below.<ref name=cau2024 /> | |||
{{clade| style=font-size:80%;line-height:85% | |||
|label1=''']''' | |||
|1={{clade | |||
|1=] ] | |||
|label2=Avetheropoda | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|label2='''Allosauroidea''' | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1='']'' | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|label1=] | |||
|1={{clade | |||
|1={{clade | |||
|1='']'' ] | |||
|2='']'' | |||
}} | |||
|2={{clade sequential | |||
|1=MNN GAD1-2 (''"]"'') | |||
|2='']'' ] | |||
|3='']'' ] | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
|label2='''Allosauria''' | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1='']'' <small>(juvenile)</small> <div style="{{mirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
|2='']'' <div style="{{mirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
|3={{clade | |||
|1='']'' ] | |||
|2={{clade | |||
|1='']'' <div style="{{mirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
|2=] <div style="{{mirrorH}}">]</div> | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
|1=] ] | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
== Paleobiology and behavior == | |||
=="Carnosaurus"== | |||
] | |||
{{Distinguish|Carnotaurus}} | |||
Multiple severe injuries have been found on allosauroid remains, which implies that allosauroids were frequently in dangerous situations and supports the hypothesis of an active, predatory lifestyle. Despite the multitude of injuries, only a few of those injuries show signs of infection. For those injuries that did become infected, the infections were usually local to the site of the injury, implying that the allosauroid ] was able to quickly stop any infection from spreading to the rest of the body. This type of immune response is similar to modern reptilian immune responses; reptiles secrete fibrin near infected areas and localize the infection before it can spread via the bloodstream.<ref name=":0">{{cite journal |last1=Foth |first1=Christian |last2=Evers |first2=Serjoscha W. |last3=Pabst |first3=Ben |last4=Mateus |first4=Octávio |last5=Flisch |first5=Alexander |last6=Patthey |first6=Mike |last7=Rauhut |first7=Oliver W.M. |title=New insights into the lifestyle of Allosaurus (Dinosauria: Theropoda) based on another specimen with multiple pathologies |journal=PeerJ |date=12 May 2015 |volume=3 |pages=e940 |doi=10.7717/peerj.940 |pmid=26020001 |pmc=4435507 |doi-access=free }}</ref> | |||
"Carnosaurus" is an ] ] name, attributed to ], ca. 1929. It is the result of a ] created by the translation of the von Huene monograph from German to Spanish. Von Huene himself intended to assign indeterminate remains to Carnosauria '']''. | |||
The injuries were also found to be mostly healed. This healing may indicate that allosauroids had an intermediate ], similar to non-avian reptiles, which means they require fewer nutrients in order to survive. A lower nutrient requirement means allosauroids do not need to undertake frequent hunts, which lowers their risk of sustaining traumatic injuries.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
Although the remains of other large theropods like tyrannosaurids bear evidence of fighting within their species and with other predators, the remains of allosauroids do not bear much evidence of injuries from theropod combat. Most notably, despite a good fossil record, allosauroid skulls lack the distinctive face-biting wounds that are common in tyrannosaurid skulls, leaving open the question of if allosauroids engaged in interspecies and intraspecies fighting.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Tanke |first1=Darren H. |last2=Currie |first2=Philip J. |title=Head-biting behavior in theropod dinosaurs: Paleopathological evidence |journal=Gaia |date=1998 |volume=15 |pages=167–184 |doi=10.7939/r34t6fj1p |doi-access=free }}</ref> Remains of the allosauroid '']'' are also often found in groups, which could imply the existence of social behavior.<ref name="Canale-etal">{{Cite journal |last1=Canale |first1=Juan Ignacio |last2=Novas |first2=Fernando Emilio |last3=Salgado |first3=Leonardo |last4=Coria |first4=Rodolfo Aníbal |date=December 1, 2015 |title=Cranial ontogenetic variation in ''Mapusaurus roseae'' (Dinosauria: Theropoda) and the probable role of heterochrony in carcharodontosaurid evolution |journal=Paläontologische Zeitschrift |language=en |volume=89 |issue=4 |pages=983–993 |doi=10.1007/s12542-014-0251-3 |bibcode=2015PalZ...89..983C |s2cid=133485236 |issn=0031-0220|hdl=11336/19258 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> While there are alternative explanations for the groupings, like ]s or ] due to drought, the frequency of finding allosauroid remains in groups supports the social animal theory. As social animals, allosauroids would share the burden of hunting, allowing injured members of the pack to recover faster.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
== Paleobiogeography == | |||
The ] history of allosauroids closely follows the order that ] separated into the modern continents.<ref name=":6" /> By the Middle Jurassic period, tetanurans had spread to every continent and diverged into the allosauroids and the coelurosaurs.<ref name=":4" /> Allosauroids first appeared in the Middle Jurassic period and were the first giant taxa (weighing more than 2 tons) in theropod history. Along with members of the superfamily ''Megalosauroidea'', allosauroids were the apex predators that occupied the Middle Jurassic to the early Late Cretaceous periods.<ref name=":2">{{cite journal |last1=Benson |first1=Roger B. J. |last2=Carrano |first2=Matthew T. |last3=Brusatte |first3=Stephen L. |title=A new clade of archaic large-bodied predatory dinosaurs (Theropoda: Allosauroidea) that survived to the latest Mesozoic |journal=Naturwissenschaften |date=January 2010 |volume=97 |issue=1 |pages=71–78 |doi=10.1007/s00114-009-0614-x |pmid=19826771 |bibcode=2010NW.....97...71B |s2cid=22646156 }}</ref> Allosauroids have been found in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, and Asia.<ref name=":6">{{cite journal |last1=Brusatte |first1=Stephen L. |last2=Sereno |first2=Paul C. |title=Phylogeny of Allosauroidea (Dinosauria: Theropoda): Comparative analysis and resolution |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |date=1 January 2008 |volume=6 |issue=2 |pages=155–182 |doi=10.1017/S1477201907002404 |bibcode=2008JSPal...6..155B |s2cid=86314252 |url=https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/phylogeny-of-allosauroidea-dinosauria(5f3e6d44-fea6-468d-81d3-769f8c2830dd).html |hdl=20.500.11820/5f3e6d44-fea6-468d-81d3-769f8c2830dd |hdl-access=free }}</ref> Specifically, a world-wide dispersal of carcharodontosaurids likely happened in the Early Cretaceous. It has been hypothesized that the dispersal involved Italy's ] region (the “heel” of the Italian peninsula), which was connected to Africa by a ] during the Early Cretaceous period; various dinosaur footprints found in Apulia support this theory.<ref name=":5">{{cite journal |last1=Eddy |first1=Drew R. |last2=Clarke |first2=Julia A. |title=New Information on the Cranial Anatomy of ''Acrocanthosaurus atokensis'' and Its Implications for the Phylogeny of Allosauroidea (Dinosauria: Theropoda) |journal=PLOS ONE |date=21 March 2011 |volume=6 |issue=3 |pages=e17932 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0017932 |pmid=21445312 |pmc=3061882 |bibcode=2011PLoSO...617932E |doi-access=free }}</ref> | |||
Allosauroids were present in both the northern and southern continents during the Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, but they were later displaced by the tyrannosauroids in North America and Asia during the Late Cretaceous. This is likely due to regional extinction events, which, along with increased species isolation through the severing of land connections between the continents, differentiated many dinosaurs in the Late Cretaceous.<ref name=":4">{{cite journal |last1=Sereno |first1=P. C. |title=The Evolution of Dinosaurs |journal=Science |date=25 June 1999 |volume=284 |issue=5423 |pages=2137–2147 |doi=10.1126/science.284.5423.2137 |pmid=10381873 }}</ref> | |||
== See also == | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} | ||
==Sources== | |||
* {{cite web | author = George Olshevsky | title = Re: What are these dinosaurs | url= http://dml.cmnh.org/1999Nov/msg00507.html | accessdate = 2007-01-29 }} (on "Carnosaurus") | |||
* {{cite journal | last1 = Currie | first1 = P. J. | last2 = Zhao | first2 = X. | year = 1993 | title = A new carnosaur (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Upper Jurassic of Xinjiang, People's Republic of China | url = | journal = Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences | volume = 30 | issue = 10| pages = 2037–2081 | doi = 10.1139/e93-179 |bibcode = 1993CaJES..30.2037C }} | |||
* Holtz, T. R., Jr. and Osmólska H. 2004. Saurischia; pp. 21–24 in D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, and H. Osmólska (eds.), ''The Dinosauria'' (2nd ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley. | |||
* {{cite journal | last1 = Sereno | first1 = P. C. | year = 1997 | title = The origin and evolution of dinosaurs | url = | journal = Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences | volume = 25 | issue = | pages = 435–489 | doi = 10.1146/annurev.earth.25.1.435 |bibcode = 1997AREPS..25..435S }} | |||
* {{cite journal | last1 = Sereno | first1 = P. C. | year = 1998 | title = A rationale for phylogenetic definitions, with application to the higher-level taxonomy of Dinosauria | url = | journal = Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen | volume = 210 | issue = | pages = 41–83 | doi = 10.1127/njgpa/210/1998/41 }} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== |
Latest revision as of 20:10, 30 December 2024
Extinct group of theropod dinosaurs Not to be confused with Carnotaurus. "Carnosaur" redirects here. For the 1984 horror novel, see Carnosaur (novel). For the 1993 film adaptation, see Carnosaur (film). For the film series, see Carnosaur (series).
Carnosaurs Temporal range: Middle Jurassic – Late Cretaceous, 174–89 Ma PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N Possible Late Toarcian and Late Maastrichtian records. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Four carnosaurs (top to bottom): Sinraptor, Acrocanthosaurus, Concavenator, Allosaurus | |||
Scientific classification | |||
Domain: | Eukaryota | ||
Kingdom: | Animalia | ||
Phylum: | Chordata | ||
Clade: | Dinosauria | ||
Clade: | Saurischia | ||
Clade: | Theropoda | ||
Clade: | Avetheropoda | ||
Clade: | †Carnosauria von Huene, 1920 | ||
Subgroups | |||
| |||
Synonyms | |||
Allosauroidea? Marsh, 1878 |
Carnosauria is an extinct group of carnivorous theropod dinosaurs that lived during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods.
While Carnosauria was historically considered largely synonymous with Allosauroidea, some recent studies have revived Carnosauria as clade including both Allosauroidea and Megalosauroidea (which is sometimes recovered as paraphyletic with respect to Allosauroidea), and thus including the majority of non-coleurosaurian members of theropod clade Tetanurae. Other researchers have found Allosauroidea and Megalosauroidea to be unrelated groups.
Distinctive characteristics of carnosaurs include large eye sockets, a long narrow skull and modifications of the legs and pelvis such as the thigh (femur) being longer than the shin (tibia).
Carnosaurs first appeared in the Middle Jurassic, around 176 mya. The last definite known carnosaurs, the carcharodontosaurs, became extinct in the Turonian epoch of the Cretaceous, roughly 90 mya; reportedly later remains of carcharodontosaurids, from the late Maastrichtian (70–66 mya) Bauru Group in Brazil, were later interpreted as those of abelisaurids. The phylogenetically problematic megaraptorans, which may or may not be carnosaurs, became extinct around 66 mya. Unquillosaurus, discovered in rocks dated to 75-70 mya, might potentially also be a carnosaur.
History of study
Carnosauria has traditionally been used as a dumping ground for all large theropods. Even non-dinosaurs, such as the rauisuchian Teratosaurus, were once considered carnosaurs. However, analysis in the 1980s and 1990s revealed that other than size, the group shared very few characteristics, making it polyphyletic. Most former carnosaurs (such as the megalosaurids, the spinosaurids, and the ceratosaurs) were reclassified as more primitive theropods. Others (such as the tyrannosaurids) that were more closely related to birds were placed in Coelurosauria. Modern cladistic analysis defines Carnosauria as those tetanurans sharing a more recent common ancestor with Allosaurus than with modern birds.
Anatomy
Carnosaurs share certain distinctive features, one of which is a triangular-shaped pubic boot. They also have 3 fingers per hand, with the second and third digit being approximately equal in length. The femur is larger than the tibia. Another defining feature of carnosaurs is that the chevron bases on their tails have anterior and posterior bone growth. The largest carnosaurs can reach up to 10 meters in length. The length of the body from the tail to the hip is between 54% and 62% of the total body length, and the length of the body from the head to the hip is between 38% and 46% of the total body length. Carnosaurs scaled their limbs relative to their body in a way similar to how other large theropods, like the tyrannosaurids, did. During the Cretaceous, some carnosaurs grew to sizes similar to those of the largest tyrannosaurids. These large carnosaurs lived in the same time period as the other large theropods found in the upper Morrison and Tendaguru formations.
Carnosaurs maintained a similar center of mass across all sizes, which is found to be between 37% and 58% of the femoral length anterior to the hip. Other similarities across all carnosaurs include the structure of their hind limb and pelvis. The pelvis in particular is thought to be designed to reduce stress regardless of body size. In particular, the way the femur is inclined reduces the bending and torsion stress. Furthermore, like other animals with tails, carnosaurs possess a caudofemoralis longus (CFL) muscle that allowed them to flex theirs. Larger carnosaurs are found to have a lower CFL muscle-to-body-mass proportion that smaller carnosaurs.
In addition to body similarities, most carnosaurs, especially most allosauroids are also united by certain skull features. Some of the defining ones include a smaller mandibular fenestra, a short quadrate bone, and a short connection between the braincase and the palate. Allosauroid skulls are about 2.5 to 3 times longer as they are tall. Their narrow skull along with their serrated teeth allow carnosaurs to better slice flesh off of their prey. Carnosaur teeth are flat and have equally-sized denticles on both edges. The flat side of the tooth face the sides of the skull, while the edges align on the same plane as the skull. From analyzing the skull of different carnosaurs, the volume of the cranial vault ranges between 95 milliliters in Sinraptor to 250 milliliters in Giganotosaurus.
Allosaurus and Concavenator preserve skin impressions showing their integument. In Allosaurus, skin impressions showing small scales measuring 1-3 mm are known from the side of the torso and the mandible. Another skin impression from the ventral side of the neck preserves broad scutate scales. An impression from the base of the tail preserves larger scales around 2 cm in diameter. However, it has been noted that these may be sauropod scales due to their similarity and the fact that non-theropod remains were discovered associated with the tail of this particular Allosaurus specimen. Concavenator preserves rectangular scutate scales on the underside of the tail, as well as scutate scales on the feet along with small scales. A series of knobs on the ulna of Concavenator have been interpreted by some authors as quill knobs theorized to have supported primitive quills; however this interpretation has been questioned, and they have been suggested to represent traces of ligaments instead.
Classification
Within Carnosauria, there is a slightly more exclusive clade, Allosauroidea. The clade Allosauroidea was originally named by Othniel Charles Marsh, but it was given a formal definition by Phil Currie and Zhao, and later used as a stem-based taxon by Paul Sereno in 1997. Sereno was the first to provide a stem-based definition for the Allosauroidea in 1998, defining the clade as "All neotetanurans closer to Allosaurus than to Neornithes." Kevin Padian used a node-based definition in his 2007 study which defined the Allosauroidea as Allosaurus, Sinraptor, their most recent common ancestor, and all of its descendants. Thomas R. Holtz and colleagues and Phil Currie and Ken Carpenter, among others, have followed this node-based definition. Depending on the study, Carnosauria and Allosauroidea are sometimes considered synonymous. In such cases, several researchers have elected to use Allosauroidea over Carnosauria.
Conventional phylogeny
The following family tree illustrates the position of Carnosauria within Theropoda. It is a simplified version of the tree presented in a synthesis of the relationships of the major theropod groups based on various studies conducted in the 2010s.
Neotheropoda |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The cladogram presented below illustrates the interrelationships between the four major groups (or families) of carnosaurs. It is a simplified version of the tree presented in the 2012 analysis by Carrano, Benson and Sampson after they excluded three "wildcard" taxa Poekilopleuron, Xuanhanosaurus, and Streptospondylus.
Allosauroidea |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Alternative hypotheses
The composition of the clade Carnosauria has been controversial among scientists since at least 2010. Different clades have been recovered by different authors, and a scientific consensus has yet to emerge.
One such clade is Neovenatoridae, a proposed clade of carcharodontosaurian carnosaurs uniting some primitive members of the group such as Neovenator with the Megaraptora, a group of theropods with controversial affinities. Other studies recover megaraptorans as basal coelurosaurs unrelated to carcharodontosaurs. Other theropods with uncertain affinities such as Gualicho, Chilantaisaurus and Deltadromeus are also sometimes included.
Neovenatoridae, as formulated by these authors, contained Neovenator, Chilantaisaurus, and a newly named clade: Megaraptora. Megaraptora contained Megaraptor, Fukuiraptor, Orkoraptor, Aerosteon, and Australovenator. These genera were allied with the other neovenatorids on the basis of several features spread out throughout the skeleton, particularly the large amount of pneumatization present. The pneumatic ilium of Aerosteon was particularly notable, as Neovenator was the only other taxon known to have that trait at the time. Neovenatorids were envisioned as the latest-surviving allosauroids, which were able to persist well into the Late Cretaceous due to their low profile and coelurosaur-like adaptations. Later studies supported this hypothesis, such as Carrano, Benson & Sampson large study of tetanuran relationships in 2012, and Zanno & Makovicky description of the newly discovered theropod Siats in 2013, which they placed within Megaraptora. Fukuiraptor and Australovenator were consistently found to be close relatives of each other; this was also the case for Aerosteon and Megaraptor. Orkoraptor was a "wildcard" taxon difficult to place with certainty.
Phylogenetic studies conducted by Benson, Carrano and Brusatte (2010) and Carrano, Benson and Sampson (2012) recovered the group Megaraptora and a few other taxa as members of the Neovenatoridae. This would make neovenatorids the latest-surviving allosauroids; at least one megaraptoran, Orkoraptor, lived near the end of the Mesozoic era, dating to the early Maastrichtian stage of the latest Cretaceous period, about 70 million years ago.
The cladogram below follows a 2016 analysis by Sebastián Apesteguía, Nathan D. Smith, Rubén Juarez Valieri, and Peter J. Makovicky based on the dataset of Carrano et al. (2012).
Allosauroidea |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsequent analyses have contradicted the above hypothesis. Novas and colleagues conducted an analysis in 2012 which found that Neovenator was closely related to carcharodontosaurids, simultaneously found Megaraptor and related genera to be coelurosaurs closely related to tyrannosaurids. However, Novas et al. subsequently found that megaraptorans lacked most of the key features in the hands of derived coelurosaurs including Guanlong and Deinonychus. Instead, their hands retain a number of primitive characteristics seen in basal tetanurans such as Allosaurus. Nevertheless, there are still a number of other traits that support megaraptorans as members of the Coelurosauria. Other taxa like Deltadromeus and Gualicho have been alternatively recovered as coelurosaurs or noasaurid ceratosaurs.
Several recent analyses do not find a relationship between Neovenator and megaraptorans, which suggests that the latter were not carnosaurs or allosauroids. As a result of these findings, and the fact that Neovenator itself is the only uncontroversial neovenatorid, the family Neovenatoridae sees little use in recent publications.
In 2019, Rauhut and Pol described Asfaltovenator vialidadi, a basal allosauroid displaying a mosaic of primitive and derived features seen within Tetanurae. Their phylogenetic analysis found traditional Megalosauroidea to represent a basal grade of carnosaurs, paraphyletic with respect to Allosauroidea. Because the authors amended the definition of Allosauroidea to include all theropods that are closer to Allosaurus fragilis than to either Megalosaurus bucklandii or Neornithes, the Piatnitzkysauridae was found to fall within Allosauroidea. A cladogram displaying the relationships they recovered is shown below.
Carnosauria |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The relationship between allosauroids and megalosauroids was also supported by a provisional analysis published by Andrea Cau in 2021. This publication is also the origin of the hypothesis that several "compsognathids" from Europe may have been juvenile carnosaurs. The results of this analysis differ from those of Rauhut and Pol in that Cau finds Megalosauroidea to be monophyletic and the sister-taxon of Allosauroidea within Carnosauria. An abbreviated version of this phylogeny is shown below.
Tetanurae |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In 2024, Andrea Cau published a paper which presented an analysis of theropod ontogeny which suggested that several theropods that were traditionally considered coelurosaurs may be juvenile allosauroids or megalosauroids. These included Aorun, Juravenator, Sciurumimus, Scipionyx, and Compsognathus. This hypothesis has not been universally accepted, and it notably conflicts with Cau's 2021 publication by finding Megalosauroidea as monophyletic and the sister taxon of Avetheropoda, a grouping which includes both carnosaurs (or allosauroids) and coelurosaurs. Notably, this analysis also treats the abelisauroid genus Kryptops as a chimera and suggests that the postcranial remains of this taxon belong to a carnosaur (possibly Sauroniops). An abbreviated version of the cladogram from that analysis is shown below.
Tetanurae |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paleobiology and behavior
Multiple severe injuries have been found on allosauroid remains, which implies that allosauroids were frequently in dangerous situations and supports the hypothesis of an active, predatory lifestyle. Despite the multitude of injuries, only a few of those injuries show signs of infection. For those injuries that did become infected, the infections were usually local to the site of the injury, implying that the allosauroid immune response was able to quickly stop any infection from spreading to the rest of the body. This type of immune response is similar to modern reptilian immune responses; reptiles secrete fibrin near infected areas and localize the infection before it can spread via the bloodstream.
The injuries were also found to be mostly healed. This healing may indicate that allosauroids had an intermediate metabolic rate, similar to non-avian reptiles, which means they require fewer nutrients in order to survive. A lower nutrient requirement means allosauroids do not need to undertake frequent hunts, which lowers their risk of sustaining traumatic injuries.
Although the remains of other large theropods like tyrannosaurids bear evidence of fighting within their species and with other predators, the remains of allosauroids do not bear much evidence of injuries from theropod combat. Most notably, despite a good fossil record, allosauroid skulls lack the distinctive face-biting wounds that are common in tyrannosaurid skulls, leaving open the question of if allosauroids engaged in interspecies and intraspecies fighting. Remains of the allosauroid Mapusaurus are also often found in groups, which could imply the existence of social behavior. While there are alternative explanations for the groupings, like predator traps or habitat reduction due to drought, the frequency of finding allosauroid remains in groups supports the social animal theory. As social animals, allosauroids would share the burden of hunting, allowing injured members of the pack to recover faster.
Paleobiogeography
The paleobiogeographical history of allosauroids closely follows the order that Pangaea separated into the modern continents. By the Middle Jurassic period, tetanurans had spread to every continent and diverged into the allosauroids and the coelurosaurs. Allosauroids first appeared in the Middle Jurassic period and were the first giant taxa (weighing more than 2 tons) in theropod history. Along with members of the superfamily Megalosauroidea, allosauroids were the apex predators that occupied the Middle Jurassic to the early Late Cretaceous periods. Allosauroids have been found in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, and Asia. Specifically, a world-wide dispersal of carcharodontosaurids likely happened in the Early Cretaceous. It has been hypothesized that the dispersal involved Italy's Apulia region (the “heel” of the Italian peninsula), which was connected to Africa by a land bridge during the Early Cretaceous period; various dinosaur footprints found in Apulia support this theory.
Allosauroids were present in both the northern and southern continents during the Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, but they were later displaced by the tyrannosauroids in North America and Asia during the Late Cretaceous. This is likely due to regional extinction events, which, along with increased species isolation through the severing of land connections between the continents, differentiated many dinosaurs in the Late Cretaceous.
See also
References
- ^ Rauhut, Oliver W. M.; Pol, Diego (11 December 2019). "Probable basal allosauroid from the early Middle Jurassic Cañadón Asfalto Formation of Argentina highlights phylogenetic uncertainty in tetanuran theropod dinosaurs". Scientific Reports. 9 (1): 18826. Bibcode:2019NatSR...918826R. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53672-7. PMC 6906444. PMID 31827108.
- Cau A. (2024). A Unified Framework for Predatory Dinosaur Macroevolution. Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 63(1): 1-19.
- Hutchinson, John R. (7 November 2005) . Smith, Dave (ed.). "Tremble Before the Carnosauria!". University of California Museum of Paleontology. Retrieved 5 March 2024.
- Delcourt, R.; Grillo, O.N. (2017). "Carcharodontosaurids remained extinct in the Campanian-Maastrichtian: Reassessment of a fragmentary maxilla from Presidente Prudente Formation, Brazil". Cretaceous Research. 84: 515–524. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2017.09.008.
- Fernandes de Azevedo, R. P.; Simbras, F. M.; Furtado, M. R.; Candeiro, C. R. A.; Bergqvist, L. P. (2013). "First Brazilian carcharodontosaurid and other new theropod dinosaur fossils from the Campanian–Maastrichtian Presidente Prudente Formation, São Paulo State, southeastern Brazil". Cretaceous Research. 40: 131–142. Bibcode:2013CrRes..40..131F. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2012.06.004.
- Novas and Agnolin, (2004). "Unquillosaurus ceibalii Powell, a giant maniraptoran (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Late Cretaceous of Argentina." Rev. Mus. Argentino Cienc. Nat., n.s. 6(1): 61-66.
- Matthew, Carrano (2012). "The phylogeny of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda)". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 10 (2): 211–300. Bibcode:2012JSPal..10..211C. doi:10.1080/14772019.2011.630927. S2CID 85354215.
- "What do terms like monophyletic, paraphyletic and polyphyletic mean?".
- Holtz, Thomas (December 1998). "A New Phylogeny of the Carnivorous Dinosaurs". Gaia. 15: 5–61. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.211.3044.
- Mateus, Octávio. (1997). Lourinhanosaurus antunesi, A New Upper Jurassic Allosauroid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from Lourinhã, Portugal. Mémorias da Academia Ciêncas de Lisboa. 37.
- ^ Bates, Karl T.; Benson, Roger B. J.; Falkingham, Peter L. (1 June 2012). "A computational analysis of locomotor anatomy and body mass evolution in Allosauroidea (Dinosauria: Theropoda)". Paleobiology. 38 (3): 486–507. Bibcode:2012Pbio...38..486B. doi:10.1666/10004.1. S2CID 86326069.
- Bybee, Paul J.; Lee, Andrew H.; Lamm, Ellen-Thérèse (2006). "Sizing the Jurassic theropod dinosaur Allosaurus: Assessing growth strategy and evolution of ontogenetic scaling of limbs". Journal of Morphology. 267 (3): 347–359. doi:10.1002/jmor.10406. PMID 16380967. S2CID 35111050.
- ^ Sereno, P. C. (25 June 1999). "The Evolution of Dinosaurs". Science. 284 (5423): 2137–2147. doi:10.1126/science.284.5423.2137. PMID 10381873.
- ^ Carrano, Matthew T.; Benson, Roger B. J.; Sampson, Scott D. (2012). "The phylogeny of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda)". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 10 (2): 211–300. Bibcode:2012JSPal..10..211C. doi:10.1080/14772019.2011.630927. S2CID 85354215.
- Sereno, P. C.; Dutheil, D. B.; Iarochene, M.; Larsson, H. C. E.; Lyon, G. H.; Magwene, P. M.; Sidor, C. A.; Varricchio, D. J.; Wilson, J. A. (17 May 1996). "Predatory Dinosaurs from the Sahara and Late Cretaceous Faunal Differentiation" (PDF). Science. 272 (5264): 986–991. Bibcode:1996Sci...272..986S. doi:10.1126/science.272.5264.986. PMID 8662584. S2CID 39658297.
- Infante, P.; Canudo, José Ignacio; Ruiz Omeñaca, José Ignacio (2005). "Primera evidencia de dinosaurios terópodos en la Formación Mirambel (Barremiense inferior, Cretácico Inferior) en Castellote, Teruel" [First evidence of theropod dinosaurs from the Mirambel Formation (Lower Barremian, Lower Cretaceous) from Castellote, Terue]. Geogaceta (in Spanish). 38. hdl:10272/8751.
- Paulina-Carabajal, Ariana & Currie, Philip. (2012). New information on the braincase and endocast of Sinraptor dongi (Theropoda: Allosauroidea): Ethmoidal region, endocranial anatomy and pneumaticity. Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 50. 85-101.
- Hendrickx, Christophe; Bell, Phil R.; Pittman, Michael; Milner, Andrew R. C.; Cuesta, Elena; O'Connor, Jingmai; Loewen, Mark; Currie, Philip J.; Mateus, Octávio; Kaye, Thomas G.; Delcourt, Rafael (June 2022). "Morphology and distribution of scales, dermal ossifications, and other non-feather integumentary structures in non-avialan theropod dinosaurs". Biological Reviews. 97 (3): 960–1004. doi:10.1111/brv.12829. ISSN 1464-7931. PMID 34991180.
- Ortega, Francisco; Escaso, Fernando; Sanz, José L. (September 2010). "A bizarre, humped Carcharodontosauria (Theropoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of Spain". Nature. 467 (7312): 203–206. Bibcode:2010Natur.467..203O. doi:10.1038/nature09181. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 20829793.
- Rauhut, Oliver W. M.; Foth, Christian (2020), Foth, Christian; Rauhut, Oliver W. M. (eds.), "The Origin of Birds: Current Consensus, Controversy, and the Occurrence of Feathers", The Evolution of Feathers: From Their Origin to the Present, Fascinating Life Sciences, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 27–45, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-27223-4_3, ISBN 978-3-030-27223-4, retrieved 2024-03-01
- ^ Eddy, Drew R.; Clarke, Julia A. (21 March 2011). "New Information on the Cranial Anatomy of Acrocanthosaurus atokensis and Its Implications for the Phylogeny of Allosauroidea (Dinosauria: Theropoda)". PLOS ONE. 6 (3): e17932. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...617932E. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017932. PMC 3061882. PMID 21445312.
- Currie, P. J.; Zhao, X. (1993). "A new carnosaur (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Upper Jurassic of Xinjiang, People's Republic of China" (PDF). Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 30 (10): 2037–2081. Bibcode:1993CaJES..30.2037C. doi:10.1139/e93-179.
- Sereno, P. C. (1997). "The origin and evolution of dinosaurs" (PDF). Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 25: 435–489. Bibcode:1997AREPS..25..435S. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.25.1.435.
- Holtz, T. R., Jr. and Osmólska H. 2004. Saurischia; pp. 21–24 in D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, and H. Osmólska (eds.), The Dinosauria (2nd ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley.
- Currie, Philip J.; Carpenter, Kenneth (2000). "A new specimen of Acrocanthosaurus atokensis (Theropoda, Dinosauria) from the Lower Cretaceous Antlers Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Aptian) of Oklahoma, USA" (PDF). Publications Scientifiques du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris. 22 (2): 207–246.
- ^ Benson, R.B.J.; Carrano, M.T; Brusatte, S.L. (2010). "A new clade of archaic large-bodied predatory dinosaurs (Theropoda: Allosauroidea) that survived to the latest Mesozoic". Naturwissenschaften. 97 (1): 71–78. Bibcode:2010NW.....97...71B. doi:10.1007/s00114-009-0614-x. PMID 19826771. S2CID 22646156.
- Hendrickx, C.; Hartman, S.A.; Mateus, O. (2015). "An overview of non-avian theropod discoveries and classification". PalArch's Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology. 12 (1): 1–73.
- Coria, Rodolfo A.; Currie, Philip J. (20 July 2016). "A New Megaraptoran Dinosaur (Dinosauria, Theropoda, Megaraptoridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia". PLOS ONE. 11 (7): e0157973. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1157973C. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157973. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4954680. PMID 27439002.
- Méndez, Ariel H.; Novas, Fernando E.; Iori, Fabiano V. (May–June 2012). "Premier enregistrement de Megaraptora (Theropoda, Neovenatoridae) au Brésil" [First record of Megaraptora (Theropoda, Neovenatoridae) from Brazil]. Comptes Rendus Palevol. 11 (4): 251–256. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2011.12.007. hdl:11336/19445.
- Carrano, Matthew T.; Benson, Roger B. J.; Sampson, Scott D. (1 June 2012). "The phylogeny of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda)". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 10 (2): 211–300. Bibcode:2012JSPal..10..211C. doi:10.1080/14772019.2011.630927. ISSN 1477-2019. S2CID 85354215.
- Zanno, L. E.; Makovicky, P. J. (2013). "Neovenatorid theropods are apex predators in the Late Cretaceous of North America". Nature Communications. 4: 2827. Bibcode:2013NatCo...4.2827Z. doi:10.1038/ncomms3827. PMID 24264527.
- ^ Sebastián Apesteguía; Nathan D. Smith; Rubén Juárez Valieri; Peter J. Makovicky (2016). "An Unusual New Theropod with a Didactyl Manus from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina". PLOS ONE. 11 (7): e0157793. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1157793A. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157793. PMC 4943716. PMID 27410683.
- F. E. Novas; F. L. Agnolín; M. D. Ezcurra; J. I. Canale; J. D. Porfiri (2012). "Megaraptorans as members of an unexpected evolutionary radiation of tyrant-reptiles in Gondwana". Ameghiniana. 49 (Suppl): R33.
- Novas, F.E.; Rolando, A.M.A.; Agnolin, F.L. (2016). "Phylogenetic relationships of the Cretaceous Gondwanan theropods Megaraptor and Australovenator: the evidence afforded by their manual anatomy" (PDF). Memoirs of Museum Victoria. 74: 49–61. doi:10.24199/j.mmv.2016.74.05. hdl:11336/48895. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-08-18.
- ^ Naish, D.; Cau, A. (July 2022). "The osteology and affinities of Eotyrannus lengi, a tyrannosauroid theropod from the Wealden Supergroup of southern England". PeerJ. 10: e12727≠. doi:10.7717/peerj.12727. PMC 9271276. PMID 35821895.
- ^ Cau, Andrea (2024). "A Unified Framework for Predatory Dinosaur Macroevolution". Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana. 63 (1): 1–19. doi:10.4435/BSPI.2024.08 (inactive 2024-11-20). ISSN 0375-7633.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link) - Novas, Fernando E. (2013). "Evolution of the carnivorous dinosaurs during the Cretaceous: The evidence from Patagonia". Cretaceous Research. 45: 174–215. Bibcode:2013CrRes..45..174N. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2013.04.001. hdl:11336/102037.
- Cau, Andrea (2021). "Comments on the Mesozoic theropod dinosaurs from Italy". Atti della Società dei Naturalisti e Matematici di Modena. 152: 81–95.
- ^ Foth, Christian; Evers, Serjoscha W.; Pabst, Ben; Mateus, Octávio; Flisch, Alexander; Patthey, Mike; Rauhut, Oliver W.M. (12 May 2015). "New insights into the lifestyle of Allosaurus (Dinosauria: Theropoda) based on another specimen with multiple pathologies". PeerJ. 3: e940. doi:10.7717/peerj.940. PMC 4435507. PMID 26020001.
- Tanke, Darren H.; Currie, Philip J. (1998). "Head-biting behavior in theropod dinosaurs: Paleopathological evidence". Gaia. 15: 167–184. doi:10.7939/r34t6fj1p.
- Canale, Juan Ignacio; Novas, Fernando Emilio; Salgado, Leonardo; Coria, Rodolfo Aníbal (December 1, 2015). "Cranial ontogenetic variation in Mapusaurus roseae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) and the probable role of heterochrony in carcharodontosaurid evolution". Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 89 (4): 983–993. Bibcode:2015PalZ...89..983C. doi:10.1007/s12542-014-0251-3. hdl:11336/19258. ISSN 0031-0220. S2CID 133485236.
- ^ Brusatte, Stephen L.; Sereno, Paul C. (1 January 2008). "Phylogeny of Allosauroidea (Dinosauria: Theropoda): Comparative analysis and resolution". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 6 (2): 155–182. Bibcode:2008JSPal...6..155B. doi:10.1017/S1477201907002404. hdl:20.500.11820/5f3e6d44-fea6-468d-81d3-769f8c2830dd. S2CID 86314252.
- Benson, Roger B. J.; Carrano, Matthew T.; Brusatte, Stephen L. (January 2010). "A new clade of archaic large-bodied predatory dinosaurs (Theropoda: Allosauroidea) that survived to the latest Mesozoic". Naturwissenschaften. 97 (1): 71–78. Bibcode:2010NW.....97...71B. doi:10.1007/s00114-009-0614-x. PMID 19826771. S2CID 22646156.
External links
- Media related to Carnosauria at Wikimedia Commons
Taxon identifiers | |
---|---|
Carnosauria |