Misplaced Pages

European integration: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:45, 15 December 2018 edit2a02:c7d:2bd6:c500:15eb:bde0:524f:636a (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 19:49, 19 December 2018 edit undo66.90.156.111 (talk) HistoryNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:


==History== ==History==
This is it. This is probably one of the biggest redpills you can get. In a few posts i will go through creation utilization of it. I will also dismantle the concept of racism, which they invented to facilitate this genocidal agenda.
https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-Kalergi-Plan This was exactly what caused the rise of natsoc and why they were focused on preserving the german people. People don't even realize what hitler was fighting. This is what he is talking about when he is speaking of the plan of the marxist jews.
Once you realize that this plan is what he is talking about. Mein kampf will make perfect sense. Unfortunately few realize it.
Kalergi plan is basically to through mass immigration miscegenate and eradicate every european ethnicity out of existance. Working on the orientals too. They sell it as creating a neo egyptian. But it will ofcourse be a rootless mixed mutt who belongs to no group and have nothing in common with eachother. except that they don't know who or what they really are either. This plan was created by marxist jews, and is the point of marxism. Why was it created. Because jews were kicked out constantly by monoethnic nations since the people would rally against them when they went too far. This is also why jews came up with this plan and insist each nation must be multiethnic and multicultural. This will allow the jew as hiding as just yet another minority ethnic group. Whilst judaism nepotistically would allow them to organized work as a group against all the disconnected mutts, and in every situation place the 'racism' card to pit them against eachother, should someone try to rally them together to stop the jews. This would also be hard, since they would belong to no ethnic group whatsoever, and germans would cease to exist.
Here is what hitler said about this insane plan. And this is why he hated jews, not because they practice judaism but because they created marxism and was spearheading this insane genocidal plan.

The Kalergi Plan seems to be rebranded as the UN's "Replacement Migration" strategy, which is also nicely laid out in the open on their website. Not even trying to hide it.
http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.shtml Or rather. The global compact on immigration IS kalergi, it's always the same plan.
A few quotes by mein kampf about this heinous genocidal plan.
>The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength by the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus it denies the value of personality in man, contests the significance of nationality and race, and thereby withdraws from humanity the premise of its existence and its culture. As a foundation of the universe, this doctrine would bring about the end of any order intellectually conceivable to man. And as, in this greatest of all recognizable organisms, the result of an application of such a law could only be chaos, on earth it could only be destruction for the inhabitants of this planet.
>If, with the help of his Marxist creed, the Jew is victorious over the other peoples of the world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity and this planet will, as it did thousands of years ago, move through the ether devoid of men.
>Eternal Nature inexorably avenges the infringement of her commands.
>Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord .

>His unfailing instinct in such things scents the original soul (die urspruengliche Seele) in everyone, and his hostility is assured to anyone who is not spirit of his spirit. Since the Jew is not the attacked but the attacker, not only anyone who attacks passes as his enemy, but also anyone who resists him. But the means with which he seeks to break such reckless but upright souls is not honest warfare, but lies and slander.
>Here he stops at nothing, and in his vileness he becomes so gigantic that no one need be surprised if among our people the personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew.
>The ignorance of the broad masses about the inner nature of the Jew, the lack of instinct and narrow-mindedness of our upper classes, make the people an easy victim for this Jewish campaign of lies.
>While from innate cowardice the upper classes turn away from a man whom the Jew attacks with lies and slander, the broad masses from stupidity or simplicity believe everything. The state authorities either cloak themselves in silence or, what usually happens, in order to put an end to the Jewish press campaign, they persecute the unjustly attacked, which, in the eyes of such an official ass, passes as the preservation of state authority and the safeguarding of law and order.
>Slowly fear and the Marxist weapon of Jewry descend like a nightmare on the mind and soul of decent people.
>They begin to tremble before the terrible enemy and thus have become his final victim.

Hitler on israel. And how it is simply a pawn, and the jews want to rule the west, and have no interest in going to israel. israel is now also clearly used to destabilize middle east for kalergi plan. To justify mass immigration for the muttification program. USA controlled by marxist jews spent 7 trillion in the middle east. And got nothing out of it except a false justification for mass muslim immigration to europe, aswell as african immigration to europe (libya excuse).
>The Jews domination in the state seems so assured that now not only can he call himself a Jew again, but he ruthlessly admits his ultimate national and political designs. A section of his race openly owns itself to be a foreign people, yet even here they lie. For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMYMLNtzeKQ
They are using the nation state of israel as a pawn. They care nothing about living there.

Hitler on how it is a jewish idea that manifests itself in marxism that they wish the goyim to adopt to undo themselves. How jews destroy women and little girls, and promote race mixing
>It is a sign of their rising confidence and sense of security that at a time when one section is still playing the German, Frenchman, or Englishman, the other with open effrontery comes out as the Jewish race.
>How close they see approaching victory can be seen by the hideous aspect which their relations with the members of other peoples takes on.
>With satanic joy in his face, the black-haired Jewish youth lurks in wait for the unsuspecting girl whom he defiles with his blood, thus stealing her from her people. With every means he tries to destroy the racial foundations of the people he has set out to subjugate. Just as he himself systematically ruins women and girls, he does not shrink back from pulling down the blood barriers for others, even on a large scale. It was and it is Jews who bring the Negroes into the Rhineland, always with the same secret thought and clear aim of ruining the hated white race by the necessarily resulting bastardization, throwing it down from its cultural and political height, and himself rising to be its master.
>For a racially pure people which is conscious of its blood can never be enslaved by the Jew. In this world he will forever be master over bastards and bastards alone.
>And so he tries systematically to lower the racial level by a continuous poisoning of individuals.
>And in politics he begins to replace the idea of democracy by the dictatorship of the proletariat.
>In the organized mass of Marxism he has found the weapon which lets him dispense with democracy and in its stead allows him to subjugate and govern the peoples with a dictatorial and brutal fist.
Take particular note that he says it was the jews who bring the negros into the rhineland to try to mutt up the germans. This is EXACTLY what the jews did to the USA aswell. Same strategy.

Hitler on how the jews undermine nation states and pit nation states against eachother to achieve their ultimate goal, if certain nation states show too much resistance to the agenda that partially came out publicly as the kalergi plan in 1925. But was private and hidden for quite a while as they gradually pursued it.
>He works systematically for revolutionization in a twofold sense: economic and political.
>Around peoples who offer too violent a resistance to attack from within he weaves a net of enemies, thanks to his international influence, incites them to war, and finally, if necessary, plants a flag of revolution on the very battlefields.
>In economics he undermines the states until the social enterprises which have become unprofitable are taken from the state and subjected to his financial control.
>In the political field he refuses the state the means for its self-preservation, destroys the foundations of all national self-maintenance and defense, destroys faith in the leadership, scoffs at its history and past, and drags everything that is truly great into the gutter.
>Culturally, he contaminates art, literature, the theater, makes a mockery of natural feeling, overthrows all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drags men down into the sphere of his own base nature.
>Religion is ridiculed, ethics and morality represented as outmoded, until the last props of a nation in its struggle for existence in this world have fallen.
>Now begins the great last revolution. In gaining political power the Jew casts off the few cloaks that he still wears. The democratic peoples Jew becomes the blood-Jew and tyrant over peoples. In a few years he tries to exterminate the national intelligentsia and by robbing the peoples of their natural intellectual leadership makes them ripe for the slaves lot of permanent subjugation.
http://i.4cdn.org/gif/1544809439353.webm

Hitler on what they did to russia, and how he wanted to prevent the marxists in russia from taking over eastern europe. (they had tried a similar revolution in germany which failed). Which is why he wanted to if possible also rescue the russians from the marxist parasite.
>The most frightful example of this kind is offered by Russia, where he killed or starved about thirty million people with positively fanatical savagery, in part amid inhuman tortures, in order to give a gang of Jewish journalists and stock exchange bandits domination over a great people.
>The end is not only the end of the freedom of the peoples oppressed by the Jew, but also the end of this parasite upon the nations. After the death of his victim, the vampire sooner or later dies too .

When you hear someone speak the phrase 'european integration' you know it is kalergi they are talking about! it's a reference to practical idealism. But it has nothing to do with that, and i think i have explained what it has to do with, it is infact to destroy the european ethnicities and replace them with mixed mutts or just direct imports, that are easier for jews to manage. Not capable of really creating any meaningful resistance. You can see that in the charlemagne prize. What is it awarded for. Those who promote 'european integration' it's a tell phrase to eachother what they are actually doing. Bill clinton got it too. What does he have to do with european integration. Well he clearly helped to fuck up USA the same way! Otherwise he wouldn't have gotten it. Which is why USA is slowly being converted to a 50 central and south american country. With a spice of negro and other people from all over the planet. Who were ofcourse not supposed to be in USA in those amounts. But in their own nations. Also unsurprising to anyone is that the marxist merkel recieved this award aswell. And emanuel macron won it aswell. Look what is happening to france and germany. It's like a honorary jew award. good goyim thanks for doing our dirty work for this heinous marxist plan. Just look who gets this award and then what is happening to their countries with regards to mass immigration, miscegenation and eradication of that ethnicity and culture that that nation belongs to. They think they are doing a great thing, brainwashed by this genocidal idea. sold as 'curing racism' and 'ending wars' by mixing everyone together.
The Kalergi Plan seems to be rebranded as the UN's "Replacement Migration" strategy, which is also nicely laid out in the open on their website. Not even trying to hide it.
http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.shtml The global compact on immigration is just a recent aspect of kalergi plan.

And finally i want to talk about the term racism that the marxists invented to work in tandem with this agenda. Basically accept kalergi plan. Or you are an evil racist. That's how it works.
The term racism is the most important revelation to get past about this. Once you truly understand that it invokes the marxist agenda to miscegenate your own people out of existence. You'll see everything so clearly. Because that's what it really means when someone says the term racism. But it's like a snake. Let me explain what i mean. See what normally people think about the term racism. Is actually not what it is about. it lays 90% of it buried under the sand. And let´s people think oh it's just if you are not so nice to people of other ethnicities. Now that's not good we can all agree on that. HOWEVER. AS SOON AS important issues comes up, such as crime statistics by ethnicity. So you can see if immigrants cause problem and which particular groups so you can kick those out and certainly not import more. If immigration comes up from countries and you say well those are too different from us. If you want to selectively improve things for let's say actual dutch/netherlanders in netherlands. For examples specifically increase only their birthrates, and not immigrants, because they come from other nation and are different ethnicity, makes no sense to increase theirs in yours. Essentially as soon as you talk about something important for your own people. THE SNAKE AWAKES. and it is now 100% visible and says.
>you cannot make a determination between your people and people of other ethnic background living in your country. They are exactly as much your people as everyone else.
Except they are not. Totally different ethnicity.
Because THAT`S what it really is about.

And when you allow that premise you say your people don't exist. And since you cannot make any determination between foreigner/immigrant of other ethnicities and your own kin. Principally if you govern like that. Actual netherlanders could totally dissapear and the government wouldn't even intervene because. YOU GUESSED IT. That would be racist.
THIS is why they are acting like this. And openly say it but ofcourse don't want to fully admit what it will lead to. They just call you racist if you are against mass immigration. They keep it veiled from you what this will lead to. But hitler knew what it would lead to. And it is obvious to anyone. The almost or near complete, if not totally complete eradication of the existing stable ethnic groups in every nation in europe! This is what they are not telling you. Because if they told you that you would freak the fuck out and want to throw them in jail! As you rightfully should! This is attempt of genocide of the highest fucking order.
Video related and how they are behaving will now make far more sense to you than it probably did before.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTSspBgHcG8

>This redpill should be widely known by now, it’s been public for 100 years
>And yet i want to say at least 95% of all whites have no clue
A lot of people know bits and pieces. But very very few know the full picture that i have just shared with you today. I need your help to spread the information.
>It's as if the EU was created specifically with the purpose of mutting up Europe and dragging down every developed nation into the abyss.
It's not as if. This is the VERY REASON FOR IT. the EU is a marxist creation and represents everything hitler and natsoc was fighting against. And the global compact on immigration is the next step of this plan. Accelerating the process. Because europeans are waking up. And have connected the dots. And we are not happy. It is not a coincidence that the EU beuraucreaucy is bullying several nations for not accepting enough immigrants. Look at the recipients of the charlemagne prize in the EU beaureaucracy and how they talk. Like for instance. Herman von Rumpoy, Martin schultz (the guy who always argues with farrage), Jean claude juncker etc. It's like the who is who of traitors to european peoples, and chiefly to their own people who they are elected to represent.
>By the way, guess who got the first Charlemagne Prize?
Kalergi.


== Between the World Wars == == Between the World Wars ==

Revision as of 19:49, 19 December 2018

This article is about the process of state integration into Europe. For the political doctrine of a common European culture, see Europeanism.

This article is part of a series on
Politics of the European Union
Member states (27)
Candidate countries
Countries with suspended accession negotiations
Applicant countries

Treaties and Declarations
Opt-outs
Treaties of accession 1972, 1979, 1985, 1994, 2003, 2005, 2011
Treaties of succession 1984, 2020
Other treaties
Abandoned treaties and agreements
Executive institutionsEuropean Council
European Commission
Legislative institutions
Council of the EU
Presidency Poland Poland (January–June 2025)
Configurations

European Parliament
(Members)
National parliaments
Judicial institutionsCourt of Justice of the EU
Auditory institutionsEuropean Court of Auditors
Other auditory bodies
European Central Bank
Other bodiesEuropean Investment Bank Group
European Stability Mechanism
European University Institute
Unified Patent Court
Agencies, decentralised independent bodies and joint undertakings
Other independent bodies
Advisory bodies
Inter-institutional bodies
EuratomEuratom members
Associated states
Euratom since 1 January 2021
Euratom since 1 January 2021
Economic and Monetary UnionEurozone members



Eurogroup



Other currencies in use

Non Euro countries relationship to Euro
Eurozone since 2015
Eurozone since 2015
Schengen Area
Non-EU members

Non-Schengen area EU member states
Schengen Area from January 2023
Schengen Area from January 2023
European Economic AreaEEA members
Non-EU members
Topics
European Economic Area
European Economic Area
Elections
European elections
Elections in EU member states
Law
Policies and issues
Foreign relationsHigh Representative

Foreign relations of EU member states


Defunct bodies
flag European Union portal

European integration is the process of industrial, political, legal, economic, social and cultural integration of states wholly or partially in Europe. European integration has primarily come about through the European Union and its policies.

History

This is it. This is probably one of the biggest redpills you can get. In a few posts i will go through creation utilization of it. I will also dismantle the concept of racism, which they invented to facilitate this genocidal agenda. https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-Kalergi-Plan This was exactly what caused the rise of natsoc and why they were focused on preserving the german people. People don't even realize what hitler was fighting. This is what he is talking about when he is speaking of the plan of the marxist jews. Once you realize that this plan is what he is talking about. Mein kampf will make perfect sense. Unfortunately few realize it. Kalergi plan is basically to through mass immigration miscegenate and eradicate every european ethnicity out of existance. Working on the orientals too. They sell it as creating a neo egyptian. But it will ofcourse be a rootless mixed mutt who belongs to no group and have nothing in common with eachother. except that they don't know who or what they really are either. This plan was created by marxist jews, and is the point of marxism. Why was it created. Because jews were kicked out constantly by monoethnic nations since the people would rally against them when they went too far. This is also why jews came up with this plan and insist each nation must be multiethnic and multicultural. This will allow the jew as hiding as just yet another minority ethnic group. Whilst judaism nepotistically would allow them to organized work as a group against all the disconnected mutts, and in every situation place the 'racism' card to pit them against eachother, should someone try to rally them together to stop the jews. This would also be hard, since they would belong to no ethnic group whatsoever, and germans would cease to exist. Here is what hitler said about this insane plan. And this is why he hated jews, not because they practice judaism but because they created marxism and was spearheading this insane genocidal plan.

The Kalergi Plan seems to be rebranded as the UN's "Replacement Migration" strategy, which is also nicely laid out in the open on their website. Not even trying to hide it. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.shtml Or rather. The global compact on immigration IS kalergi, it's always the same plan. A few quotes by mein kampf about this heinous genocidal plan. >The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength by the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus it denies the value of personality in man, contests the significance of nationality and race, and thereby withdraws from humanity the premise of its existence and its culture. As a foundation of the universe, this doctrine would bring about the end of any order intellectually conceivable to man. And as, in this greatest of all recognizable organisms, the result of an application of such a law could only be chaos, on earth it could only be destruction for the inhabitants of this planet. >If, with the help of his Marxist creed, the Jew is victorious over the other peoples of the world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity and this planet will, as it did thousands of years ago, move through the ether devoid of men. >Eternal Nature inexorably avenges the infringement of her commands. >Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord .

>His unfailing instinct in such things scents the original soul (die urspruengliche Seele) in everyone, and his hostility is assured to anyone who is not spirit of his spirit. Since the Jew is not the attacked but the attacker, not only anyone who attacks passes as his enemy, but also anyone who resists him. But the means with which he seeks to break such reckless but upright souls is not honest warfare, but lies and slander. >Here he stops at nothing, and in his vileness he becomes so gigantic that no one need be surprised if among our people the personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew. >The ignorance of the broad masses about the inner nature of the Jew, the lack of instinct and narrow-mindedness of our upper classes, make the people an easy victim for this Jewish campaign of lies. >While from innate cowardice the upper classes turn away from a man whom the Jew attacks with lies and slander, the broad masses from stupidity or simplicity believe everything. The state authorities either cloak themselves in silence or, what usually happens, in order to put an end to the Jewish press campaign, they persecute the unjustly attacked, which, in the eyes of such an official ass, passes as the preservation of state authority and the safeguarding of law and order. >Slowly fear and the Marxist weapon of Jewry descend like a nightmare on the mind and soul of decent people. >They begin to tremble before the terrible enemy and thus have become his final victim.

Hitler on israel. And how it is simply a pawn, and the jews want to rule the west, and have no interest in going to israel. israel is now also clearly used to destabilize middle east for kalergi plan. To justify mass immigration for the muttification program. USA controlled by marxist jews spent 7 trillion in the middle east. And got nothing out of it except a false justification for mass muslim immigration to europe, aswell as african immigration to europe (libya excuse). >The Jews domination in the state seems so assured that now not only can he call himself a Jew again, but he ruthlessly admits his ultimate national and political designs. A section of his race openly owns itself to be a foreign people, yet even here they lie. For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMYMLNtzeKQ They are using the nation state of israel as a pawn. They care nothing about living there.

Hitler on how it is a jewish idea that manifests itself in marxism that they wish the goyim to adopt to undo themselves. How jews destroy women and little girls, and promote race mixing >It is a sign of their rising confidence and sense of security that at a time when one section is still playing the German, Frenchman, or Englishman, the other with open effrontery comes out as the Jewish race. >How close they see approaching victory can be seen by the hideous aspect which their relations with the members of other peoples takes on. >With satanic joy in his face, the black-haired Jewish youth lurks in wait for the unsuspecting girl whom he defiles with his blood, thus stealing her from her people. With every means he tries to destroy the racial foundations of the people he has set out to subjugate. Just as he himself systematically ruins women and girls, he does not shrink back from pulling down the blood barriers for others, even on a large scale. It was and it is Jews who bring the Negroes into the Rhineland, always with the same secret thought and clear aim of ruining the hated white race by the necessarily resulting bastardization, throwing it down from its cultural and political height, and himself rising to be its master. >For a racially pure people which is conscious of its blood can never be enslaved by the Jew. In this world he will forever be master over bastards and bastards alone. >And so he tries systematically to lower the racial level by a continuous poisoning of individuals. >And in politics he begins to replace the idea of democracy by the dictatorship of the proletariat. >In the organized mass of Marxism he has found the weapon which lets him dispense with democracy and in its stead allows him to subjugate and govern the peoples with a dictatorial and brutal fist. Take particular note that he says it was the jews who bring the negros into the rhineland to try to mutt up the germans. This is EXACTLY what the jews did to the USA aswell. Same strategy.

Hitler on how the jews undermine nation states and pit nation states against eachother to achieve their ultimate goal, if certain nation states show too much resistance to the agenda that partially came out publicly as the kalergi plan in 1925. But was private and hidden for quite a while as they gradually pursued it. >He works systematically for revolutionization in a twofold sense: economic and political. >Around peoples who offer too violent a resistance to attack from within he weaves a net of enemies, thanks to his international influence, incites them to war, and finally, if necessary, plants a flag of revolution on the very battlefields. >In economics he undermines the states until the social enterprises which have become unprofitable are taken from the state and subjected to his financial control. >In the political field he refuses the state the means for its self-preservation, destroys the foundations of all national self-maintenance and defense, destroys faith in the leadership, scoffs at its history and past, and drags everything that is truly great into the gutter. >Culturally, he contaminates art, literature, the theater, makes a mockery of natural feeling, overthrows all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drags men down into the sphere of his own base nature. >Religion is ridiculed, ethics and morality represented as outmoded, until the last props of a nation in its struggle for existence in this world have fallen. >Now begins the great last revolution. In gaining political power the Jew casts off the few cloaks that he still wears. The democratic peoples Jew becomes the blood-Jew and tyrant over peoples. In a few years he tries to exterminate the national intelligentsia and by robbing the peoples of their natural intellectual leadership makes them ripe for the slaves lot of permanent subjugation. http://i.4cdn.org/gif/1544809439353.webm

Hitler on what they did to russia, and how he wanted to prevent the marxists in russia from taking over eastern europe. (they had tried a similar revolution in germany which failed). Which is why he wanted to if possible also rescue the russians from the marxist parasite. >The most frightful example of this kind is offered by Russia, where he killed or starved about thirty million people with positively fanatical savagery, in part amid inhuman tortures, in order to give a gang of Jewish journalists and stock exchange bandits domination over a great people. >The end is not only the end of the freedom of the peoples oppressed by the Jew, but also the end of this parasite upon the nations. After the death of his victim, the vampire sooner or later dies too .

When you hear someone speak the phrase 'european integration' you know it is kalergi they are talking about! it's a reference to practical idealism. But it has nothing to do with that, and i think i have explained what it has to do with, it is infact to destroy the european ethnicities and replace them with mixed mutts or just direct imports, that are easier for jews to manage. Not capable of really creating any meaningful resistance. You can see that in the charlemagne prize. What is it awarded for. Those who promote 'european integration' it's a tell phrase to eachother what they are actually doing. Bill clinton got it too. What does he have to do with european integration. Well he clearly helped to fuck up USA the same way! Otherwise he wouldn't have gotten it. Which is why USA is slowly being converted to a 50 central and south american country. With a spice of negro and other people from all over the planet. Who were ofcourse not supposed to be in USA in those amounts. But in their own nations. Also unsurprising to anyone is that the marxist merkel recieved this award aswell. And emanuel macron won it aswell. Look what is happening to france and germany. It's like a honorary jew award. good goyim thanks for doing our dirty work for this heinous marxist plan. Just look who gets this award and then what is happening to their countries with regards to mass immigration, miscegenation and eradication of that ethnicity and culture that that nation belongs to. They think they are doing a great thing, brainwashed by this genocidal idea. sold as 'curing racism' and 'ending wars' by mixing everyone together. The Kalergi Plan seems to be rebranded as the UN's "Replacement Migration" strategy, which is also nicely laid out in the open on their website. Not even trying to hide it. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.shtml The global compact on immigration is just a recent aspect of kalergi plan.

And finally i want to talk about the term racism that the marxists invented to work in tandem with this agenda. Basically accept kalergi plan. Or you are an evil racist. That's how it works. The term racism is the most important revelation to get past about this. Once you truly understand that it invokes the marxist agenda to miscegenate your own people out of existence. You'll see everything so clearly. Because that's what it really means when someone says the term racism. But it's like a snake. Let me explain what i mean. See what normally people think about the term racism. Is actually not what it is about. it lays 90% of it buried under the sand. And let´s people think oh it's just if you are not so nice to people of other ethnicities. Now that's not good we can all agree on that. HOWEVER. AS SOON AS important issues comes up, such as crime statistics by ethnicity. So you can see if immigrants cause problem and which particular groups so you can kick those out and certainly not import more. If immigration comes up from countries and you say well those are too different from us. If you want to selectively improve things for let's say actual dutch/netherlanders in netherlands. For examples specifically increase only their birthrates, and not immigrants, because they come from other nation and are different ethnicity, makes no sense to increase theirs in yours. Essentially as soon as you talk about something important for your own people. THE SNAKE AWAKES. and it is now 100% visible and says. >you cannot make a determination between your people and people of other ethnic background living in your country. They are exactly as much your people as everyone else. Except they are not. Totally different ethnicity. Because THAT`S what it really is about.

And when you allow that premise you say your people don't exist. And since you cannot make any determination between foreigner/immigrant of other ethnicities and your own kin. Principally if you govern like that. Actual netherlanders could totally dissapear and the government wouldn't even intervene because. YOU GUESSED IT. That would be racist. THIS is why they are acting like this. And openly say it but ofcourse don't want to fully admit what it will lead to. They just call you racist if you are against mass immigration. They keep it veiled from you what this will lead to. But hitler knew what it would lead to. And it is obvious to anyone. The almost or near complete, if not totally complete eradication of the existing stable ethnic groups in every nation in europe! This is what they are not telling you. Because if they told you that you would freak the fuck out and want to throw them in jail! As you rightfully should! This is attempt of genocide of the highest fucking order. Video related and how they are behaving will now make far more sense to you than it probably did before. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTSspBgHcG8

>This redpill should be widely known by now, it’s been public for 100 years >And yet i want to say at least 95% of all whites have no clue A lot of people know bits and pieces. But very very few know the full picture that i have just shared with you today. I need your help to spread the information. >It's as if the EU was created specifically with the purpose of mutting up Europe and dragging down every developed nation into the abyss. It's not as if. This is the VERY REASON FOR IT. the EU is a marxist creation and represents everything hitler and natsoc was fighting against. And the global compact on immigration is the next step of this plan. Accelerating the process. Because europeans are waking up. And have connected the dots. And we are not happy. It is not a coincidence that the EU beuraucreaucy is bullying several nations for not accepting enough immigrants. Look at the recipients of the charlemagne prize in the EU beaureaucracy and how they talk. Like for instance. Herman von Rumpoy, Martin schultz (the guy who always argues with farrage), Jean claude juncker etc. It's like the who is who of traitors to european peoples, and chiefly to their own people who they are elected to represent. >By the way, guess who got the first Charlemagne Prize? Kalergi.

Between the World Wars

A 1928 Europa coin for the hypothetical "Federated States of Europe" (États fédérés d'Europe)

Following the catastrophe of the First World War, thinkers and visionaries from a range of political traditions again began to float the idea of a politically unified Europe. In the early 1920s a range of internationals were founded (or re-founded) to help like-minded political parties to coordinate their activities. These ranged from the Comintern (1919), to the Labour and Socialist International (1921) to the Radical and Democratic Entente of centre-left progressive parties (1924), to the Green International of farmers' parties (1923), to the centre-right International Secretariat of Democratic Parties Inspired by Christianity (1925). While the remit of these internationals was global, the predominance of political parties from Europe meant that they facilitated interaction between the adherents of a given ideology, across European borders. Within each political tradition, voices emerged advocating not merely the cooperation of various national parties, but the pursuit of political institutions at the European level.

One of the first to articulate this view was Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, who outlined a conservative vision of European unity in his Pan-Europa manifesto (1923). The First Paneuropean Congress took place in Vienna in 1926, and the association possessed 8000 members by the time of the Wall Street Crash. The aim was for a specifically Christian, and by implication Catholic, Europe. The British civil servant and future Conservative minister Arthur Salter published a book advocating The United States of Europe in 1933.

In contrast the Soviet commissar (minister) Leon Trotsky raised the slogan "For a Soviet United States of Europe" in 1923, advocating a Europe united along communist principles.

Among liberal-democratic parties, the French centre-left undertook several initiatives to group like-minded parties from the European states. In 1927, the French politician Emil Borel, a leader of the centre-left Radical Party and the founder of the Radical International, set up a French Committee for European Cooperation, and a further twenty countries set up equivalent committees. However, it remained an elite venture: the largest committee, the French one, possessed fewer than six-hundred members, two-thirds of whom were parliamentarians. Two centre-left French prime ministers went further. In 1929 Aristide Briand gave a speech in the presence of the League of Nations Assembly in which he proposed the idea of a federation of European nations based on solidarity and in the pursuit of economic prosperity and political and social co-operation. In 1930, at the League's request, Briand presented a Memorandum on the organisation of a system of European Federal Union. The next year the future French prime minister Édouard Herriot published his book The United States of Europe. Indeed, a template for such a system already existed, in the form of the 1921 Belgian and Luxembourgish customs and monetary union.

Support for the proposals by the French centre-left came from a range of prestigious figures. Many eminent economists, aware that the economic race-to-the-bottom between states was creating ever greater instability, supported the view: these included John Maynard Keynes. The French political scientist and economist Bertrand Jouvenel remembered a widespread mood after 1924 calling for a "harmonisation of national interests along the lines of European union, for the purpose of common prosperity". The Spanish philosopher and politician, Ortega y Gasset, expressed a position shared by many within Republican Spain: "European unity is no fantasy, but reality itself; and the fantasy is precisely the opposite: the belief that France, Germany, Italy or Spain are substantive & independent realities. Eleftherios Venizelos, Prime Minister of Greece, outlined his government's support in a 1929 speech by saying that "the United States of Europe will represent, even without Russia, a power strong enough to advance, up to a satisfactory point, the prosperity of the other continents as well".

Between the two world wars, the Polish statesman Józef Piłsudski envisaged the idea of a European federation that he called Międzymorze ("Intersea" or "Between-seas"), known in English as Intermarum, which was a Polish-oriented version of Mitteleuropa.

The Great Depression, the rise of fascism and communism and subsequently World War II prevented the inter war movements from gaining further support: between 1933 and 1936 most of Europe's remaining democracies became dictatorships, and even Ortega's Spain and Venizelos's Greece had both been plunged into civil war. But although the supporters of European unity, whether social-democratic, liberal or Christian-democratic, were out of power during the 1930s and unable to put their ideas into practice, many would find themselves in power in the 1940s and 1950s, and better-placed to put into effect their earlier remedies against economic and political crisis.

At the end of World War II, the continental political climate favoured unity in democratic European countries, seen by many as an escape from the extreme forms of nationalism which had devastated the continent. In a speech delivered on 19 September 1946 at the University of Zürich, Switzerland, Winston Churchill postulated a United States of Europe. The same speech however contains remarks, less often quoted, which make it clear that Churchill did not initially see Britain as being part of this United States of Europe: We British have our own Commonwealth of Nations ... And why should there not be a European group which could give a sense of enlarged patriotism and common citizenship to the distracted peoples of this turbulent and mighty continent and why should it not take its rightful place with other great groupings in shaping the destinies of men? ... France and Germany must take the lead together. Great Britain, the British Commonwealth of Nations, mighty America and I trust Soviet Russia-for then indeed all would be well-must be the friends and sponsors of the new Europe and must champion its right to live and shine.

We must build a kind of United States of Europe. In this way only, will hundreds of millions of toilers be able to regain the simple joys and hopes which make life worth living.

Winston Churchill

Theories of integration

The question of how to avoid wars between the nation-states was essential for the first theories. Federalism and Functionalism proposed the containment of the nation-state, while Transactionalism sought to theorise the conditions for the stabilisation of the nation-state system.

One of the most influential theories of European integration is neofunctionalism, developed by Ernst B. Haas (1958) and further investigated by Leon Lindberg (1963). This theory focuses on spillovers of integration, which leads to more integration. By contrast, the other big influential theory in Integration Studies, Liberal Intergovernmentalism, focuses on state preferences being realised through bargaining. This theory was developed by Andrew Moravcsik in the 1990s, by building on the 'intergovernmentalist' work of Stanley Hoffman and others. It remains very influential. The important debate between neofunctionalism and Liberal intergovernmentalism still remains central in understanding the development and setbacks of the European integration.

As the empirical world has changed, so have the theories and thus the understanding of European Integration. Today there is a relatively new focus on the complex policy-making in the EU and multi-level governance (MLG) trying to produce a theory of the workings and development of the EU.

According to a 2016 study, European integration deepens through a "failing forward" process whereby,

Intergovernmental bargaining leads to incompleteness because it forces states with diverse preferences to settle on lowest common denominator solutions. Incompleteness then unleashes forces that lead to crisis. Member states respond by again agreeing to lowest common denominator solutions, which address the crisis and lead to deeper integration. To date, this sequential cycle of piecemeal reform, followed by policy failure, followed by further reform, has managed to sustain both the European project and the common currency.

Citizens' organisations calling for further integration

Various federalist organisations have been created over time supporting the idea of a federal Europe. These include the Union of European Federalists, the European Movement International and the European Federalist Party. The Union of European Federalists (UEF) is a European non-governmental organisation, campaigning for a Federal Europe. It consists of 20 constituent organisations and it has been active at the European, national and local levels for more than 50 years. The European Movement International is a lobbying association that coordinates the efforts of associations and national councils with the goal of promoting European integration, and disseminating information about it. The European Federalist Party is the pro-European, pan-European and federalist political party which advocates further integration of the EU and the establishment of a Federal Europe. Its aim is to gather all Europeans to promote European federalism and to participate in all elections all over Europe. It has national sections in 15 countries.

Overlap of membership in various agreements

European Political CommunitySchengen AreaCouncil of EuropeEuropean UnionEuropean Economic AreaEurozoneEuropean Union Customs UnionEuropean Free Trade AssociationNordic CouncilVisegrád GroupBaltic AssemblyBeneluxGUAM Organization for Democracy and Economic DevelopmentCentral European Free Trade AgreementOpen BalkanOrganization of the Black Sea Economic CooperationUnion StateCommon Travel AreaInternational status and usage of the euro#Sovereign statesSwitzerlandLiechtensteinIcelandNorwaySwedenDenmarkFinlandPolandCzech RepublicHungarySlovakiaBulgariaRomaniaGreeceEstoniaLatviaLithuaniaBelgiumNetherlandsLuxembourgItalyFranceSpainAustriaGermanyPortugalSloveniaMaltaCroatiaCyprusRepublic of IrelandUnited KingdomTurkeyMonacoAndorraSan MarinoVatican CityGeorgia (country)UkraineAzerbaijanMoldovaBosnia and HerzegovinaArmeniaMontenegroNorth MacedoniaAlbaniaSerbiaKosovoRussiaBelarus
An Euler diagram showing the relationships between various multinational European organisations and agreements

There are various agreements with overlapping membership. Several countries take part in a larger number of agreements than others.

Common membership of member states of the European Union

All member states of the European Union (EU) are members of the:

have organizations that are members of the:

have organisations that are members, associated partners or observers of the

are located in the European Broadcasting Area (EBA)

Most integrated countries

Fourteen states are part of the Eurozone and NATO. These are Belgium, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain.

They are all members of or take part in:

Of these states several take part in further organisations, or have other basic structural things in common, but some are outside.

Qty State observation
1 Spain did not sign the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
1 Lithuania is not part of EUMETNET
3 Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania are not part of the RG Continental Europe of the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity
3 Estonia, Latvia, the Netherlands did not sign the Declaration 52 on symbols of the European Union
4 Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia are not members of the European Space Agency (ESA) but all have signed an ECS Agreement
4 Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia are not part of European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN). Slovenia has formally confirmed its wish to become a member
4 Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia are not part of European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), but have signed a co-operation agreement
4 Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia are not members of European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), but Lithuania is EMBL Prospect Member State
5 Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Spain do not have the UIC standard gauge as the main railway track gauge
5 Latvia, Lithuania, Greece, Italy, Portugal did not sign the Prüm Convention, but all except Latvia notified the Council of their desire to become part of the convention
6 Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia, the Netherlands, Luxembourg don't participate in the Institut Laue–Langevin (ILL)
7 Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Luxembourg, Greece don't participate in the European Southern Observatory (ESO)
9 Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Luxembourg don't participate in the European Gendarmerie Force
10 Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands don't participate in the European Maritime Force (Euromarfor or EMF)

France is part of all of these groups, and Belgium and Germany take part in all where at least half of the 14 member states participate.

Geographic scope

Beyond geographic Europe

Some agreements that are mostly related to countries of the European continent, are also valid in territories outside the continent.

Not listed below are agreements if their scope is beyond geographic Europe only because the agreement includes:

  • Territories of transcontinental countries: Russia, Kazakhstan, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia contain some territory in Europe and some in Asia
  • Special territories of European countries, e.g. Special territories of member states of the European Union
  • Cyprus, which is a member of the Council of Europe and several other agreements

List:

Limited to regions within geographic Europe

Several regional integration efforts have effectively promoted intergovernmental cooperation and reduced the possibility of regional armed conflict. Other initiatives have removed barriers to free trade in European regions, and increased the free movement of people, labour, goods, and capital across national borders.

Nordic countries

Since the end of the Second World War, the following organisations have been established in the Nordic region:

The Nordic Council and the Nordic Council of Ministers is a co-operation forum for the parliaments and governments of the Nordic countries created in February 1953. It includes the states of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, and their autonomous territories (Greenland, Faroe Islands and Åland).

The Nordic Passport Union, created in 1954 but implemented on 1 May 1958, establishes free movement across borders without passports for the countries' citizens. It comprises Denmark, Sweden and Norway as foundational states; further, it includes Finland and Iceland since 24 September 1965, and the Danish autonomous territories of Faroe Islands since 1 January 1966.

Baltic Sea region

The following political and/or economic organisations have been in the Baltic region in the post-modern era:

The Baltic Assembly aims to promote co-operation between the parliaments of the Baltic states, namely the Republics of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. The organisation was planned in Vilnius on 1 December 1990, and the three nations agreed to its structure and rules on 13 June 1994.

The Baltic Free Trade Area (BAFTA) was a trade agreement between Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia. It was signed on 13 September 1993 and came into force on 1 April 1994. The agreement was later extended to apply also to agricultural products, effective from 1 January 1997. BAFTA ceased to exist when its members joined the EU on 1 May 2004.

The Council of the Baltic Sea States (CBSS) was founded in 1992 to promote intergovernmental cooperation among Baltic Sea countries in questions concerning economy, civil society development, human rights issues, and nuclear and radiation safety. It has 12 members including Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Iceland (since 1995), Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Russia, Sweden and the European Commission.

In 2009 the European Council approved the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR) following a communication from the European Commission. The EUSBSR was the first macro-regional strategy in Europe. The Strategy aims to reinforce cooperation within the Baltic Sea Region, to address challenges together, and to promote balanced development in the Region. The Strategy contributes to major EU policies, including Europe 2020, and reinforces integration within the Region.

Nordic-Baltic Eight

Main article: NB8

Low Countries region (Benelux)

Since the end of the First World War the following unions have been set in the Low Countries region:

The Benelux is an economic and political union between Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg. On 5 September 1944, a treaty establishing the Benelux Customs Union was signed. It entered into force in 1948, and ceased to exist on 1 November 1960, when it was replaced by the Benelux Economic Union after a treaty signed in The Hague on 3 February 1958. A Benelux Parliament was created in 1955.

The Belgium-Luxembourg Economic Union (BLEU) can be seen as a forerunner of the Benelux. BLEU was created by the treaty signed on 25 July 1921. It established a single market between both countries, while setting the Belgian franc and Luxembourgian franc at a fixed parity.

Black Sea region

Several regional organisations have been founded in the Black Sea region since the fall of the Soviet Union, such as:

The Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) aims to ensure peace, stability and prosperity by encouraging friendly and good-neighbourly relations among the 12 state members, located mainly in the Black Sea region. It was created on 25 June 1992 in Istanbul, and entered into force on 1 May 1999. The 11 founding members were Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Georgia, Greece, Moldova, Romania, Russia, Turkey, and Ukraine. Serbia (then Serbia and Montenegro) joined in April 2004.

The GUAM Organization for Democracy and Economic Development is a regional organisation of four post-Soviet states, which aims to promote cooperation and democratic values, ensure stable development, enhance international and regional security, and stepping up European integration. Current members include the four founding ones, namely, Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, and Moldova. Uzbekistan joined in 1999, and left in 2005.

Britain and Ireland

Since the end of the First World War, the following agreements have been signed in the Britain and Ireland and Irish region:

The British-Irish Council was created by the Belfast Agreement in 1998 to "promote the harmonious and mutually beneficial development of the totality of relationships among the peoples of these islands". It was formally established on 2 December 1999. Its membership comprises Ireland, the United Kingdom, three of the countries of the UK (Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales), and three British Crown dependencies (Guernsey, the Isle of Man and Jersey). Because England does not have a devolved government, it is not represented on the Council as a separate entity.

The Common Travel Area is a passport-free zone established in 1922 that comprises Ireland, the United Kingdom, the Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey.

Central Europe

Flags of Visegrád Group countries

The following cooperation agreements have been signed in Central Europe:

The Visegrád Group is a Central-European alliance for cooperation and European integration, based on an ancient strategic alliance of core Central European countries. The Group originated in a summit meeting of Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Poland held in the Hungarian castle town of Visegrád on 15 February 1991. The Czech Republic and Slovakia became members after the dissolution of Czechoslovakia in 1993.

In 1989, Central European Initiative, a forum of regional has been formed in Hungary.

The Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA) is a trade agreement between countries in Central Europe and the Balkans, which works as a preparation for full European Union membership. As of 2013, it has 7 members: Macedonia, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Moldova, Montenegro, Serbia and UNMIK-administered Kosovo province.

It was established in 1992 by Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Poland, but came into force only in 1994. Czechoslovakia had in the meantime split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Slovenia joined in 1996, while Romania did the same in 1997, Bulgaria in 1999, and Croatia in 2003. In 2004, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovenia left the CEFTA to join the EU. Romania and Bulgaria left it in 2007 for the same reason. Subsequently, Macedonia joined it in 2006, and Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Moldova, Montenegro, Serbia and UNMIK (on behalf of Kosovo) in 2007. In 2013, Croatia left the CEFTA to join the EU.

Switzerland and Liechtenstein participate in a customs union since 1924, and both employ the Swiss franc as national currency.

Eastern Europe

The effects of the EU integration process of the countries from the former Eastern bloc are still debated. As a result, the relationship between immigration levels and EU public support remains uncertain. Through the integration, the countries in Eastern Europe have experienced growth of the economy, benefits of the free market agreements and freedom of the labor movement within the EU. However, the results of the empirical socioeconomic analyses suggest that in Spain, France, Ireland and the Netherlands, the immigration from CEE had negative effects on support for European integration in the host societies. The research also implies that the immigration from the CEE seems to undermine the long-term effects of the integration. There are theories for the programs of social development that range in views from: an extended contact with the immigrants from Eastern Europe might help forge a common European identity and it could also lead to a potential national isolation, caused by tightening support mechanisms for the labor immigration. Equal amount of research also implies that the internal migration of the countries within the EU is necessary for the successful development of its economic union.

Danube region

The EU Strategy for the Danube Region was endorsed by the European Council in 2011 and is the second macro-regional strategy in Europe. The Strategy provides a basis for improved cooperation among 14 countries along the Danube River. It aims to improve the effectiveness of regional integration efforts and leverage the impact of policies at the EU, national and local levels.

Council of Europe

Main article: Council of Europe
  Ten founding members  Joined subsequently  Official candidates  Observer at the Parliamentary Assembly  Observer at the Committee of Ministers  Observer at the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly

Against the background of the devastation and human suffering during the Second World War as well as the need for reconciliation after the war, the idea of European integration led to the creation of the Council of Europe in Strasbourg in 1949.

The most important achievement of the Council of Europe is the European Convention on Human Rights of 1950 with its European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, which serves as a de facto supreme court for human rights and fundamental freedoms throughout Europe. Human rights are also protected by the Council of Europe's Committee for the Prevention of Torture and the European Social Charter.

Most conventions of the Council of Europe pursue the aim of greater legal integration, such as the conventions on legal assistance, against corruption, against money laundering, against doping in sport, or internet crime.

Cultural co-operation is based on the Cultural Convention of 1954 and subsequent conventions on the recognition of university studies and diplomas as well as on the protection of minority languages.

After the fall of the Berlin Wall, former communist European countries were able to accede to the Council of Europe, which now comprises 47 states in Europe. Therefore, European integration has practically succeeded at the level of the Council of Europe, encompassing almost the whole European continent, with the exception of Kazakhstan and Belarus, the latter due to its still non-democratic government.

European integration at the level of the Council of Europe functions through the accession of member states to its conventions, and through political coordination at the level of ministerial conferences and inter-parliamentary sessions. In accordance with its Statute of 1949, the Council of Europe works to achieve greater unity among its members based on common values, such as human rights and democracy.

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe

The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) is a trans-Atlantic intergovernmental organisation whose aim is to secure stability in Europe. It was established as the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE) in July 1973, and was subsequently transformed into its current form in January 1995. The OSCE has 56 member states, covering most of the northern hemisphere.

The OSCE develops three lines of activities, namely the Politico-Military Dimension, the Economic and Environmental Dimension and the Human Dimension. These respectively promote (i) mechanisms for conflict prevention and resolution; (ii) the monitoring, alerting and assistance in case of economic and environmental threats; and (iii) full respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.

European Free Trade Association

EFTA members

The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) is a European trade bloc which was established on 3 May 1960 as an alternative for European states who did not join the EEC. EFTA currently has four member states: Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, and Liechtenstein; just Norway and Switzerland are founding members.

The EFTA Convention was signed on 4 January 1960 in Stockholm by seven states: Austria, Denmark, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Finland became an associate member in 1961 and a full member in 1986; Iceland joined in 1970 and Liechtenstein did the same in 1991.

The United Kingdom and Denmark left in 1973, when they joined the European Community (EC). Portugal left EFTA in 1986, when it also joined the EC. Austria, Finland and Sweden ceased to be EFTA members in 1995 by joining the European Union, which superseded the EC in 1993.

European Broadcasting Union

Countries with Active EBU Membership coloured in order of accession from 1950.
Main article: European Broadcasting Union

The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) is an alliance of public service media entities, established on 12 February 1950. As of 2015, the organisation comprises 73 active members in 56 countries, and 34 associate members from a further 20 countries. Most EU states are part of this organisation and therefore EBU has been subject to supranational legislation and regulation. It also hosted debates between candidates for the European Commission presidency for the 2014 parliamentary elections but is unrelated to the institution itself.

European Patent Convention

EPC contracting states and the extension states, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro.
Main article: European Patent Convention

As of 2013 there are 38 parties to European Patent Convention. The Convention on the Grant of European Patents was first signed on 5 October 1973.

European Communities

In 1951, Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and West Germany agreed to confer powers over their steel and coal production to the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) in the Treaty of Paris, which came into force on 23 July 1952.

Coal and steel production was essential for the reconstruction of countries in Europe after the Second World War and this sector of the national economy had been important for warfare in the First and Second World Wars. Therefore, France had originally maintained its occupation of the Saarland with its steel companies after the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany) in 1949. By transferring national powers over the coal and steel production to a newly created ECSC Commission, the member states of the ECSC were able to provide for greater transparency and trust among themselves.

This transfer of national powers to a "Community" to be exercised by its Commission was paralleled under the 1957 Treaty of Rome establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (or Euratom) and the European Economic Community (EEC) in Brussels.

In 1967, the Merger Treaty (or Brussels Treaty) combine the institutions of the ECSC and Euratom into that of the EEC. They already shared a Parliamentary Assembly and Courts. Collectively they were known as the European Communities. In 1987, the Single European Act (SEA) was the first major revision of the Treaty of Rome that formally established the single European market and the European Political Cooperation. The Communities originally had independent personalities although they were increasingly integrated, and over the years were transformed into what is now called the European Union.

The six states that founded the three Communities were known as the "inner six" (the "outer seven" were those countries who formed the European Free Trade Association). These were Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and West Germany. The first enlargement was in 1973, with the accession of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom. Greece joined in 1981, and Portugal and Spain in 1986. On 3 October 1990 East Germany and West Germany were reunified, hence East Germany became part of the Community in the new reunified Germany (not increasing the number of states).

A key person in the Community creation process was Jean Monnet, regarded as the "founding father" of the European Union, which is seen as the dominant force in European integration.

Martin Schulz proposed the abolition of the National parliaments of the European Union and their replacement by the European Parliament for the establishment of the United States of Europe where every Head of government will be appointed by the representative of every Party leader who gained the larger percentage of votes in their native country compared to the respective ones in every other Member state of the European Union running on behalf of the same European political party, to every country where a Political party under the same European Union Parliamentary group has won the first place in the Elections to the European Parliament, which will happen every five years with no possibility for a snap election. Every Political party not participating in a European political party will not be allowed to participate in the Elections to the European Parliament, thus essentially preventing it from participating in Government.

European Union

Participation in the European Single Market of the EU:  European Union member states form the European Single Market  Non-EU states that participate in the EU Single Market with exceptions: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland (see also EFTA)  Non-EU states with a Stabilisation and Association Agreement with the EU allowing for participation in selected sectors of the Single Market: EU accession candidates Albania, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia; potential EU accession candidates: Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo  Non-EU states which have a bilateral Customs Union arrangement with the EU: Andorra, San Marino and EU accession candidate Turkey  Non-EU states with a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area agreement with the EU allowing for participation in selected sectors of the Single Market: Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine
See also: Enlargement of the European Union and Future enlargement of the European Union

The European Union (EU) is an association of twenty-eight sovereign member states, that by treaty have delegated certain of their competences to common institutions, in order to coordinate their policies in a number of areas, without however constituting a new state on top of the member states. Officially established by the Treaty of Maastricht in 1993 upon the foundations of the pre-existing European Economic Community.

Thus, 12 states are founding members, namely, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and the United Kingdom. In 1995, Austria, Finland and Sweden entered the EU. Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia joined in 2004. Bulgaria and Romania joined in 2007. Croatia acceded in 2013. Official candidate states include Albania, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Turkey. Morocco's application was rejected by the EEC. Iceland and Switzerland have withdrawn their respective applications. Norway rejected membership in two referendums.

The institutions of the European Union, its parliamentarians, judges, commissioners and secretariat, the governments of its member states as well as their people, all play a role in European Integration. Nevertheless, the question of who plays the key role is disputed as there are different theories on European Integration focusing on different actors and agency.

The European Union has a number of relationships with nations that are not formally part of the Union. According to the European Union's official site, and a statement by Commissioner Günter Verheugen, the aim is to have a ring of countries, sharing EU's democratic ideals and joining them in further integration without necessarily becoming full member states.

Competences

Main article: Member State of the European Union

Whilst most responsibilities ('competences') are retained by the member states, some competences are conferred exclusively on the Union for collective decision, some are shared pending Union action and some receive Union support. These are shown on this table:

Competences of the European Union in relation to those of its member states
Exclusive competence
Shared competence
Supporting competence
The Union has exclusive competence to make directives and conclude international agreements when provided for in a Union legislative act as to …
Member States cannot exercise competence in areas where the Union has done so, that is …
Union exercise of competence shall not result in Member States being prevented from exercising theirs in …
  • research, technological development and (outer) space
  • development cooperation, humanitarian aid
The Union coordinates Member States policies or implements supplemental to their common policies not covered elsewhere in …
The Union can carry out actions to support, coordinate or supplement Member States' actions in …
  • the protection and improvement of human health
  • industry
  • culture
  • tourism
  • education, youth, sport and vocational training
  • civil protection (disaster prevention)
  • administrative cooperation

Economic integration

Further information: Economy of the European Union Further information: Third country economic relationships with the European Union

The European Union operates a single economic market across the territory of all its members, and uses a single currency between the Eurozone members. Further, the EU has a number of economic relationships with nations that are not formally part of the Union through the European Economic Area and custom union agreements.

Free trade area

EU Free trade agreements

The creation of the EEC eliminated tariffs, quotas and preferences on goods among member states, which are the requisites to define a free trade area (FTA).

Numerous countries have signed a European Union Association Agreement (AA) with FTA provisions. These mainly include Mediterranean countries (Algeria in 2005, Egypt in 2004, Israel in 2000, Jordan in 2002, Lebanon in 2006, Morocco in 2000, Palestinian National Authority in 1997, and Tunisia in 1998), albeit some countries from other trade blocs have also signed one (such as Chile in 2003, Mexico in 2000, and South Africa in 2000).

Further, many Balkan states have signed a Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) with FTA provisions, such as Albania (signed 2006), Montenegro (2007), Macedonia (2004), Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia (both 2008, entry-into-force pending).

In 2008, Poland and Sweden proposed the Eastern Partnership which would include setting a FTA between the EU and Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine.

Customs union

The European Union Customs Union defines an area where no customs are levied on goods travelling within it. It includes all member states of the European Union. The abolition of internal tariff barriers between EEC member states was achieved in 1968.

Andorra and San Marino belong to the EU customs unions with third states. Turkey is linked by the European Union-Turkey Customs Union.

European Single market

A prominent goal of the EU since its creation by the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 is establishing and maintaining a single market. This seeks to guarantee the four basic freedoms, which are related to ensure the free movement of goods, services, capital and people around the EU's internal market.

The European Economic Area (EEA) agreement allows Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein to participate in the European Single Market without joining the EU. The four basic freedoms apply. However, some restrictions on fisheries and agriculture take place. Switzerland is linked to the European Union by Swiss-EU bilateral agreements, with a different content from that of the EEA agreement.

Eurozone

Economic and Monetary Union of the European Union (2014)   Members of the Eurozone   ERM-II-member with opt-out (Denmark)   EU-member with opt-out (United Kingdom)   The rest of the EU-members, which are obliged to join

The Eurozone refers to the European Union member states that have adopted the euro currency union as the third stage of the European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). Further, certain states outside the EU have adopted the euro as their currency, despite not belonging to the EMU. Thus, a total of 25 states, including 19 European Union states and six non-EU members, currently use the euro.

The Eurozone came into existence with the official launch of the euro on 1 January 1999. Physical coins and banknotes were introduced on 1 January 2002.

The original members were Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain. Greece adopted the euro on 1 January 2001. Slovenia joined on 1 January 2007, Cyprus and Malta were admitted on 1 January 2008, Slovakia joined on 1 January 2009, Estonia on 1 January 2011, Latvia on 1 January 2014 and Lithuania on 1 January 2015.

Outside the EU, agreements have been concluded with Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and Vatican City for formal adoption, including the right to issue their own coins. Montenegro and Kosovo unilaterally adopted the euro when it launched.

Fiscal union

Main article: European Fiscal Union

There has long been speculation about the possibility of the European Union eventually becoming a fiscal union. In the wake of the European sovereign debt crisis, calls for closer fiscal ties, possibly leading to some sort of fiscal union have increased; though it is generally regarded as implausible in the short term, some analysts regard fiscal union as a long-term necessity. While stressing the need for coordination, governments have rejected talk of fiscal union or harmonisation in this regard.

Aviation

  ECAC, Eurocontrol, ECAA, EU   ECAC, Eurocontrol, ECAA   ECAC, Eurocontrol   ECAC, ECAA   ECAC

There are three main aviation related institutions present in Europe:

Energy

Energy Community in 2014 - Contracting Parties in dark blue, Observers in light blue

The transnational energy related structures present in Europe are:

Standardisation

The transnational standardisation organisations present in Europe are:

Social and political integration

Education

The ERASMUS programme (European Region Action Scheme for the Mobility of University Students) seeks to encourage and support free movement of the academic community. It was established in 1987.

A total of 33 states (including all European Union states, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey) are involved.

European Higher Education Area

The European Higher Education Area (EHEA) aims to integrate education systems in Europe. Thus, degrees and study periods are recognised mutually. This is done by following the Bologna process, and under the Lisbon Recognition Convention of the Council of Europe.

The Bologna declaration was signed in 1999 by 29 countries, all EU members or candidates at the moment (except Cyprus which joined later) and three out of four EFTA countries: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and United Kingdom. Croatia, Cyprus, Liechtenstein, and Turkey joined in 2001. In 2003, Albania, Andorra, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Holy See (a Council of Europe permanent observer), Macedonia, Russia, and Serbia signed the convention. Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine followed in 2005. Montenegro joined in 2007. Finally, Kazakhstan (not a member of the Council of Europe) joined in 2010. This makes a total of 47 member states. Monaco and San Marino are the only members of the Council of Europe which have not adopted the convention. The other European nation that is eligible to join, but has not, is Belarus.

Research

There are a number of multinational research institutions based in Europe. Of these, eight are engaged in the EIROforum collaboration.

Particle physics:

Meteorology:

Health

The European Health Insurance Card (or EHIC) is issued free of charge and allows anyone who is insured by or covered by a statutory social security scheme of the EEA countries and Switzerland to receive medical treatment in another member state for free or at a reduced cost, if that treatment becomes necessary during their visit (for example, due to illness or an accident), or if they have a chronic pre-existing condition which requires care such as kidney dialysis.

The epSOS project, also known as Smart Open Services for European Patients, aims to promote free movement of patients. It will allow health professionals to electronically access the data from patients from another country, to electronically process prescriptions in all involved countries, or to provide treatment in another EU state to a patient on a waiting list.

The project has been launched by the EU and 47 member institutions from 23 EU member states and 3 non-EU members. They include national health ministries, national competence centres, social insurance institutions and scientific institutions as well as technical and administrative management entities.

Charter of Fundamental Rights

The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union is a document enshrining certain fundamental rights. The wording of the document has been agreed at ministerial level and has been incorporated into the Treaty of Lisbon. Poland and the United Kingdom have negotiated an opt out from this Charter.

Right to vote

The European integration process has extended the right of foreigners to vote. Thus, European Union citizens were given voting rights in local elections by the 1992 Maastricht Treaty. Several member states (Belgium, Luxembourg, Lithuania, and Slovenia) have extended since then the right to vote to all foreign residents. This was already the case in Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden. Further, voting and eligibility rights are granted among citizens of the Nordic Passport Union, and between numerous countries through bilateral treaties (i.e. between Norway and Spain, or between Portugal and Brazil, Cape Verde, Iceland, Norway, Uruguay, Venezuela, Chile and Argentina), or without them (i.e. Ireland and the United Kingdom). Finally, within the EEA, Iceland and Norway also grant the right to vote to all foreign residents.

Schengen zone

Main article: Schengen Area
Schengen Agreement   Full Schengen EU members  Non-EU Schengen members  Future members  Cooperating countries

The main purpose of the establishment of the Schengen Agreement is the abolition of physical borders among European countries. A total of 30 states, including 26 European Union states (all except Ireland and United Kingdom) and four non-EU members (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland), are subject to the Schengen rules. Its provisions have already been implemented by 26 states, leaving just Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, and Romania to do so among signatory states.

Further, Monaco, San Marino and Vatican City are de facto members.

Visa policy in EU

Main article: Visa policy of the Schengen Area

European Union has visa-free regime agreements with some European countries outside EU and discussing such agreements with others; Russia, Ukraine, and Moldova. Matters concerning Turkey have also been debated. Ireland and the United Kingdom maintain independent visa policies in the EU.

Military

Main article: Military of the European Union
NATO members in blue, CSTO members in orange

There are a number of multi-national military and peacekeeping forces which are ultimately under the command of the EU, and therefore can be seen as the core for a future European Union army. These corps include forces from 26 EU states – all except Denmark, which has an opt-out clause in its accession treaty and is not obliged to participate in the common defence policy; and Malta, which currently does not participate in any battlegroup –, Norway and Turkey. Further, the Western European Union (WEU) capabilities and functions have been transferred to the European Union, under its developing Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP).

The EU also has close ties with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), according to the Berlin Plus agreement. This is a comprehensive package of agreements made between NATO and the EU on 16 December 2002. With this agreement the EU is given the possibility to use NATO assets in case it wanted to act independently in an international crisis, on the condition that NATO does not want to act itself – the so-called "right of first refusal".

The participation in European defence organisations

In fact, many EU member states are among the 28 NATO members. The Treaty of Brussels is considered the precursor to NATO. The North Atlantic Treaty was signed in Washington, D.C. in 1949. It included the five Treaty of Brussels states, as well as the United States, Canada, Portugal, Italy, Norway, Denmark and Iceland. Greece and Turkey joined the alliance in 1952, and West Germany did the same in 1955. Spain entered in 1982. In 1999, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Poland became NATO members. Finally, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovenia, and Slovakia joined in 2004. In 2009, Croatia and Albania joined. In 2008, Ukraine and Georgia were told that they will also eventually become members. The Republic of Macedonia's application process is finished, but it is blocked by Greece. Thus, 22 out of 28 NATO states are among the 28 EU members, another two are members of the EEA, and one more is an EU candidate and also a member of the European Union Customs Union.

Space

For more information on ESA enlargement see also: Enlargement of the European Space Agency

On 22 May 2007, the member states of the European Union have agreed to create a common political framework for space activities in Europe by unifying the approach of the European Space Agency (ESA) with those of the individual European Union member states.

However, ESA is an intergovernmental organisation with no formal organic link to the EU; indeed the two institutions have different member states and are governed by different rules and procedures. ESA was created in 1975 by the merger of the two pre-existing European organisations engaged in space activities, ELDO and ESRO. The 10 founding members were Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Ireland joined on 31 December 1975. In 1987, Austria and Norway became member states. Finland joined in 1995, Portugal in 2000, Greece and Luxembourg in 2005, the Czech Republic in 2008, and Romania in 2011. Currently, it has 20 member states: all the EU member states before 2004, plus Czech Republic, Norway, Poland, Romania, and Switzerland. In addition, Canada has had the special status of a Cooperating State under a series of cooperation agreements dating since 1979.

The political perspective of the European Union is to make ESA an agency of the EU by 2014. ESA is likely to expand in the coming years with the countries which joined the EU in both 2004 and 2007. Currently, almost all EU member states are in different stages of affiliation with ESA. Poland has joined on 19 November 2012. Hungary and Estonia have signed ESA Convention. Latvia and Slovenia have started to implement a Plan for European Cooperating State (PECS) Charter. Slovakia, Lithuania and Bulgaria have signed a European Cooperating State (ECS) Agreement. Cyprus, Malta and Croatia have signed Cooperation Agreements with ESA.

Membership in European Union agreements

  EU, Schengen, EMU, CSDP (All agreements): 17 c.   EU, Schengen, CSDP: 4 c.   EU, Schengen: 1 c.   EU, EMU, CSDP: 2 c.   EU, CSDP: 3 c.   EEA, Schengen: 2 c.   Schengen, Bilateral treaties: 1 c.   Candidates, some agreements: 5 c.   Microstates, some agreements: 5 c.   Association Agreement: 5 c.   some agreements: 0 c.
For participation of non-EU countries in EU integration initiatives see also Multi-speed Europe

A small group of EU member states have joined all European treaties, instead of opting out on some. They drive the development of a federal model for the European integration. This is linked to the concept of Multi-speed Europe where some countries would create a core union; and goes back to the Inner Six references to the founding member states of the European Communities.

At present the formation of a formal Core Europe Federation ("a federation within the confederation") had been held off at every occasion that such a federation treaty had been discussed. Instead supranational institutions are created that govern more areas in "Inner Europe" than the existing European integration provides for.

Among the 28 EU state members, seventeen states have signed all integration agreements: Austria, Belgium, Finland, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain.

The agreements considered include the fifth stage of economic integration or EMU, the Schengen agreement and the Common Security and Defence Policy.

Thus, among the 28 EU countries, 19 have joined the Eurozone, 22 have joined Schengen, and 27 compose the European Military.

Further, some countries which do not belong to the EU have joined several of these initiatives, albeit sometimes at a lower stage such as the Customs Union, the Common Market (EEA), or even unilaterally adopting the euro; by taking part in Schengen, either as a signatory state, or de facto; or by joining some common military forces.

Thus, six non-EU countries have adopted the euro (four through an agreement with the EU and two unilaterally), four non-EU states have joined the Schengen agreement officially, and other countries have joined common military corps.

The following table shows the status of each state membership to the different agreements promoted by the EU. It lists 45 countries, including the 28 EU member states, 5 candidate states, members of EEA (2 countries plus one EU candidate), 3 countries with some soft ties to the EU, such as those with SAA or participation agreements, as well as the 4 remaining Microstates (Liechtenstein is an EEA member) and Switzerland which has multiple bilateral treaties with the EU, as well as two Eastern Partner states.

Hence, this table summarises some components of EU laws applied in the European states. Some territories of EU member states also have a special status in regard to EU laws applied. Some territories of EFTA member states also have a special status in regard to EU laws applied as is the case with some European microstates. For member states that do not have special-status territories the EU law applies fully with the exception of the opt-outs in the European Union and states under a safeguard clause or alternatively some states participate in enhanced co-operation between a subset of the EU members. Additionally there are various examples of non-participation by some EU members and non-EU states participation in particular Agencies of the European Union, the programmes for European Higher Education Area, European Research Area and Erasmus Mundus.

European Union Agreements
State Map EU EEA Customs Union Schengen EMU (Euro) CSDP
Austria Austria Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes EU BGs
Belgium Belgium Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Eurocorps, EU BGs
Estonia Estonia Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes EU BGs
Finland Finland Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes EU BGs
France France Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Eurocorps, EU BGs, EGF
Germany Germany Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Eurocorps, EU BGs
Greece Greece Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes EU BGs
Italy Italy Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes EU BGs, EGF
Latvia Latvia Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes EU BGs
Lithuania Lithuania Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes EU BGs, EGF (partner)
Luxembourg Luxembourg Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Eurocorps, EU BGs
Malta Malta Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Netherlands Netherlands Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes EU BGs, EGF
Portugal Portugal Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes EU BGs, EGF
Slovakia Slovakia Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes EU BGs
Slovenia Slovenia Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes EU BGs
Spain Spain Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Eurocorps, EU BGs, EGF
Czech Republic Czech Republic Yes Yes Yes Yes Obliged to join EU BGs
Hungary Hungary Yes Yes Yes Yes Obliged to join EU BGs
Poland Poland Yes Yes Yes Yes Obliged to join Eurocorps, EU BGs, EGF
Sweden Sweden Yes Yes Yes Yes Obliged to join EU BGs
Denmark Denmark Yes Yes Yes Yes Opt-out, ERM II No
Cyprus Cyprus Yes Yes Yes Obliged to join Yes EU BGs
Republic of Ireland Ireland Yes Yes Yes No, Visa Free Yes EU BGs
Bulgaria Bulgaria Yes Yes Yes Obliged to join Obliged to join EU BGs
Croatia Croatia Yes Accession agreement initialled Yes Obliged to join Obliged to join EU BGs
Romania Romania Yes Yes Yes Obliged to join Obliged to join; target is 2019 EU BGs, EGF
United Kingdom United Kingdom Yes (Intends to withdraw) Yes Yes No, Visa Free Opt-out EU BGs
Norway Norway Applications withdrawn Yes No Yes No No; EU BGs
Iceland Iceland Applications withdrawn Yes No Yes No No
Switzerland Switzerland Application withdrawn Bilateral treaties No (Swiss-Liecht CU) Yes No No
Albania Albania Candidate No, EC, ECAA No No, Visa Free No No
North Macedonia Macedonia Candidate No, EC, ECAA No No, Visa Free No No; EU BGs
Montenegro Montenegro Candidate No, EC, ECAA No No, Visa Free Unilaterally adopted No
Serbia Serbia Candidate No, EC, ECAA No No, Visa Free No No; EU BGs
Turkey Turkey Candidate No Customs Union No No No; EU BGs
Andorra Andorra No No Customs Union No, Visa Free Yes No
Liechtenstein Liechtenstein No Yes No (Swiss-Liecht CU) Yes No No
Monaco Monaco No No de facto, with France de facto, with France Yes No
San Marino San Marino No No Customs Union Open border Yes No
Vatican City Vatican City No No No Open border Yes No
Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina SAA, Application Submitted 15 February 2016 No, EC, ECAA No No, Visa Free No No
Moldova Moldova AA No, EC, CAA signed No No, Visa Free No No
Georgia (country) Georgia AA No, EC, CAA signed No No, Visa Free No No
Ukraine Ukraine AA No, EC No No, Visa Free No No; EU BGs
Kosovo Republic of Kosovo SAA No, EC, ECAA No No Unilaterally adopted No

Notes:

  1. ^ In a customs union with the EU.
  2. ^ Formal agreement with the EU to issue euros.

Future of European integration

Main articles: Enlargement of the European Union, Future enlargement of the European Union, Federal Europe, Eurosphere, Eurasian Union, and Enlargement of the Eurasian Economic Union
De jure status of possible future enlargement of the European Union:  Current member states   Member state which has given notice of its intent to withdraw from the EU: United Kingdom  Candidates: Albania, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Turkey   Potential candidates that have applied for membership: Bosnia and Herzegovina   Potential candidates that have not applied for membership: Kosovo* (status disputed).   States that have frozen or withdrawn their applications: Iceland (frozen), Norway (withdrawn), Switzerland (withdrawn)   States which have both ratified an EU Association Agreement and have had their European perspective for membership explicitly recognised by the EU: Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine (members of DCFTA)

There is no fixed end to the process of integration. The discussion on the possible final political shape or configuration of the European Union is sometimes referred to as the debate on the finalité politique (French for "political purpose"). Integration and enlargement of the European Union are major issues in the politics of Europe, each at European, national and local level. Integration may conflict with national sovereignty and cultural identity, and is opposed by eurosceptics. To the east of the European Union, the countries of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia launched the creation of the Eurasian Union in the year 2015, which was subsequently joined by Armenia and Kyrgyzstan. Other states in the region, such as Moldova and Tajikistan may also join. Meanwhile, the post-Soviet disputed states of Abkhazia, Artsakh, South Ossetia, and Transnistria have created the Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations to closer integrate among each other. Some Eastern European countries such as Armenia have opted to cooperate with both the EU and the Eurasian Union. On 24 February 2017 Tigran Sargsyan, the Chairman of the Eurasian Economic Commission stated that Armenia's stance was to cooperate and work with both the European Union and the Eurasian Union. Sargsyan added that although Armenia is part of the Eurasian Union, a new European Union Association Agreement between Armenia and the EU would be finalized shortly.

Several countries in Eastern Europe have engaged the EU with the aim to grow economic and political ties. The Euronest Parliamentary Assembly, established in 2003, is the inter-parliamentary forum in which members of the European Parliament and the national parliaments of Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia participate and forge closer political and economic ties with the European Union. All of these States participate in the EU's Eastern Partnership program. The Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation and the Community of Democratic Choice are other organizations established to promote European integration, stability, and democracy. On 12 January 2002, the European Parliament noted that Armenia and Georgia may enter the EU in the future. Currently, Georgia is the only country in the Caucasus actively seeking EU membership.

European Security Treaty

In 2008, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev announced a new concept for Russian foreign politics and called for the creation of a common space in Euro-Atlantic and Eurasia area "from Vancouver to Vladivostok". On 5 June 2009 in Berlin he proposed a new all-European pact for security that would include all European, CIS countries and the United States. On 29 November 2009 a draft version of the European Security Treaty appeared. French president Sarkozy spoke positively about Medvedev's ideas and called for closer security and economic relation between Europe and Russia. Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych also called for stronger integration of Europe, Ukraine and Russia. On the other hand, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen said such new agreement is unnecessary.

Common space from Lisbon to Vladivostok

Area from Lisbon to Vladivostok with all European and CIS countries

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in a German newspaper in 2010 called for common economic space, free-trade area or more advanced economic integration, stretching from Lisbon to Vladivostok. He also said it is quite possible Russia could join the eurozone one day. French president Nicolas Sarkozy in 2010 said he believes in 10 or 15 years there will be common economic space between EU and Russia with visa-free regime and general concept of security.

Concept of a single legal space for the CIS and Europe

  Member states of the European Union   Current enlargement agenda   Special member state territories outside the EU   EEZ of special member state territories outside the EU

Russian legal scholar Oleg Kutafin and economist Alexander Zakharov produced a Concept of a Single Legal Space for the CIS and Europe in 2002. This idea was fully incorporated in the resolution of the 2003 Moscow Legal Forum. The Forum gathered representatives of more than 20 countries including 10 CIS countries. In 2007 both the International Union of Jurists of the CIS and the International Union (Commonwealth) of Advocates passed resolutions that strongly support the Concept of a Single Legal Space for Europe and post-Soviet Countries.

The concept said: "Obviously, to improve its legislation Russia and other countries of CIS should be oriented toward the continental legal family of European law. The civil law system is much closer to the Russian and other CIS countries will be instrumental in harmonising legislation of CIS countries and the European Community but all values of common law should be also investigated on the subject of possible implementation in some laws and norms. It is suggested that the introduction of the concept of a Single legal space and a single Rule of Law space for Europe and CIS be implemented in four steps:

  1. Development plans at the national level regarding adoption of selected EC legal standards in the legislation of CIS countries;
  2. Promotion of measures for harmonisation of law with the goal of developing a single legal space for Europe and CIS countries in the area of commercial and corporate law;
  3. Making the harmonisation of judicial practice of CIS countries compatible with Rule of Law principles and coordination of the basic requirements of the Rule of Law in CIS countries with the EU legal standards.
  4. Development of ideas the Roerich Pact (International Treaty on the Protection of Artistic and Scientific Institution and Historic Monuments initiated by Russian thinker Nicholas Roerich and signed in 1935 by 40 % of sovereign states in Washington D.C.) into the law of CIS countries and European law.

Beyond Europe

Euro-Mediterranean Partnership

EU regional initiatives; current enlargement agenda (SAP and candidate countries), ENP; Eastern Partnership, Euromediterranean Partnership and EU-Russia Common Spaces

The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership or Barcelona Process was organised by the European Union to strengthen its relations with the countries in the Mashriq and Maghreb regions. It started in 1995 with the Barcelona Euro-Mediterranean Conference, and it has been developed in successive annual meetings.

The European Union enlargement of 2004 brought two more Mediterranean countries (Cyprus and Malta) into the Union, while adding a total of 10 to the number of Member States. The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership today comprises 43 members: 28 European Union member states, and 15 partner countries (Albania, Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Monaco, Montenegro, Morocco, Syria and Tunisia, as well as the Palestinian Territories). Libya has had observer status since 1999.

The Euro-Mediterranean Free Trade Area (EU-MEFTA) is based on the Barcelona Process and European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP). It will cover the EU, the EFTA, the EU customs unions with third states (Andorra, San Marino, and Turkey), the EU candidate states, and the partners of the Barcelona Process.

The Union for the Mediterranean is a community of countries, mostly bordering the Mediterranean Sea, established in July 2008.

Ties with partners

Morocco already has a number of close ties with the EU, including an Association Agreement with FTA provisions, air transport integration, or the participation in military operations such as ALTHEA in Bosnia.

Further, it will be the first partner to go beyond association by enhancing political and economic ties, entering the Single Market, and participating in some EU agencies.

Commonwealth of Independent States

See also: Post-Soviet states § Regional organizations
European Union and Commonwealth of Independent States

The Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) is a loose organisation in which most former Soviet republics participate. A visa-free regime operates among members and a free-trade area is planned. Ukraine is not an official member, but has participated in the organisation. Some members are more integrated than others, for example Russia and Belarus form a Union State. In 2010, Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan formed a customs union and a single market (Common Economic Space) commenced on 1 January 2012. The Presidents of Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan established the Eurasian Union with a Eurasian Commission in 2015, subsequently joined by Armenia and Kyrgyzstan. A common currency is also planned, potentially to be named "evraz". Some other countries in the region, such as Moldova are potential members of these organisations.

Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations

The post-Soviet disputed states of Abkhazia, Artsakh, South Ossetia, and Transnistria are all members of the Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations which aims to forge closer integration.

EU and other regions and countries in the world

ASEMACP countriesEuroLatProposed TAFTA

The European Union has made loose organisations and meeting with some other countries and regions. ASEM is forum held every two years since 1996, consisting of EU and some Asian countries, African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States with EU form ACP–EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly promoting ACP–EU development cooperation, democracy and human rights, EU and Latin American countries have made Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly. TAFTA is proposed free trade area between EU and United States.

Other organisations in world

European countries like the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Portugal have made organisations with other countries in the world with which they have strong cultural and historical links.

Commonwealth of NationsFrancophonieIbero-American States

European languages in the world

English is considered to be the global lingua franca. European languages like English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Russian and German are official, co-official or widely in use in many countries with a colonial past or with a European diaspora.

AnglophoneFrancophoneHispanophone and LusophoneRussophoneItalophoneGermanophone

World integration

Main article: Globalisation WTO membersEconomic integrationICC membersDeath penaltyConscriptionParis AgreementSame sex marriage

See also

Portal:

References

  1. Ben Rosamond, Theories of European Integration, Palgrave Macmillan, 2000, pp. 21–22.
  2. Guieu, Jean-Michel (2003). ".Le Comité fédéral de coopération européenne". Organisations internationales et architectures européennes (1929-1939): 73–91.
  3. D. Weigall and P. Stirk, editors, The Origins and Development of the European Community, Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1992, pp. 11–15.
  4. Jouvenel, Bertrand (1980). Un Voyageur dans le Siècle. Paris. p. 79.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  5. Ortega y Gasset, José (1998 (1929)). The Revolt of the Masses. Madrid: Editorial Castalia. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  6. Emm. Papadakis, Nikolaos (2006). Eleftherios K. Venizelos - A Biography. National Research Foundation "Eleftherios K. Venizelos". pp. 48–50.
  7. "The political consequences". Cvce.eu. Retrieved 16 January 2015.
  8. "Ein britischer Patriot für Europa: Winston Churchills Europa-Rede, Universität Zürich, 19. September 1946" [A British Patriot for Europe: Winston Churchill's Speech on Europe University of Zurich, 19 September 1946]. Zeit Online. Retrieved 13 January 2010.
  9. Churchill, Winston (1946). Speech to the Academic Youth (Speech). Zürich, Switzerland.
  10. ^ Policy-making in the European Union. Wallace, Helen (Helen S.), Wallace, William, 1941-, Pollack, Mark A., 1966- (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005. pp. 16–19. ISBN 0199276129. OCLC 58828845.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  11. "Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration". Comparative Political Studies. 2016. doi:10.1177/0010414015617966.
  12. Declaration 52 at Wikisource
  13. "The North Atlantic Treaty". 29 November 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2008.
  14. What is the EUSBSR : EUSBSR : GroupSpaces Archived 2 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine. Balticsea-region-strategy.eu. Retrieved on 19 July 2013.
  15. Alsasua, Jesús, Javier Bilbao‐Ubillos, and Jon Olaskoaga. "The EU integration process and the convergence of social protection benefits at national level." International Journal of Social Welfare 16.4 (2007): 297-306.
  16. Toshkov, Dimiter, and Elitsa Kortenska. "Does immigration undermine public support for integration in the European Union?." JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 53.4 (2015): 910-925.
  17. "EU STRATEGY FOR THE DANUBE REGION" (PDF). Files.groupspaces.com. Retrieved 16 December 2017.
  18. "EBU Active Members". Ebu.ch. EBU. Retrieved 9 June 2015.
  19. "EBU Associate Members". Ebu.ch. EBU. Retrieved 9 June 2015.
  20. "European Commission - PRESS RELEASES - Press release - Commission approves the EBU-Eurovision system". europa.eu. Retrieved 24 October 2016.
  21. "EBU - Eurovision Debate". EBU. Retrieved 24 October 2016.
  22. Philip Oltermann. "Martin Schulz wants 'United States of Europe' within eight years". The Guardian. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  23. ^ Officially referred to by the EU and most other European organisations by the provisional appellation "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", due to an ongoing naming dispute.
  24. As outlined in Title I of Part I of the consolidated Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
  25. Belarus still Participating in "Eastern Partnership," FM Archived 15 June 2012 at the Wayback Machine. Telegraf.by. Retrieved on 19 July 2013.
  26. "EU Looks East as Foreign Policy Council Convenes". Deutsche Welle. Bonn. 25 May 2008. Retrieved 25 May 2008.
  27. Münchau, Wolfgang (10 November 2010). "Fiscal union is crucial to the euro's survival". Financial Times. London. Retrieved 20 January 2011. The establishment of a fiscal union would require such a massive change in the European treaties that it is hard to see how it could be done.
  28. Münchau, Wolfgang (12 December 2010). "How a mini fiscal union could end instability". Financial Times. London. Retrieved 20 January 2011. Yet almost all political and legal experts who specialise in the European Union believe a fiscal union is Utopian. If both are right a fiscal union is simultaneously necessary and impossible.
  29. Saltmarsh, Matthew (24 January 2011). "Tighter Fiscal Union in Europe? Not So Fast, Says French Finance Minister". The New York Times. Retrieved 24 January 2011.
  30. "epSOS: Home". Epsos.eu. Archived from the original on 28 December 2017. Retrieved 16 December 2017. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  31. "Visa-free travel between Russia and the EU? Yes, but not yet". European Voice. Brussels. 9 September 2010. Archived from the original on 14 September 2010. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  32. "Russia optimistic on EU visa-free travel". EU Observer. 3 September 2010.
  33. . PRNewswire. 13 September 2010.
  34. "Moldova eyes EU visa-free travel". EU Observer. 10 May 2010.
  35. Turkey's visa policy: Has Turkey given up its demand of free movement in the EU?. Hurriyet. 15 February 2010.
  36. "Turkey - EU Relations". Web.archive.org. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  37. "New force behind EU foreign policy". News.bbc.co.uk. 15 March 2007. Retrieved 16 December 2017.
  38. "Marseille Declaration" (PDF). Weu.int. Retrieved 16 December 2017.
  39. Bram Boxhoorn, Broad Support for NATO in the Netherlands, 21 September 2005, "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 18 February 2007. Retrieved 19 August 2007. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  40. "European Space Policy". Esa.int. 22 May 2007. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
  41. Canada-ESA Evaluation 2010 (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 20 April 2011. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  42. "ESA Portal – Benefits for Europe – ESA and Canada renew partnership in space science and technology – printer version". Esa.int. 15 December 2010. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
  43. "ESA BR-268" (PDF). Retrieved 17 October 2011.
  44. "ESA Portal – Polish flag raised at ESA". Esa.int. 19 November 2012. Retrieved 7 December 2012.
  45. "Hungary accedes to ESA Convention / Welcome to ESA / About Us / ESA". Esa.int. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  46. "Estonia accedes to ESA Convention / Press Releases / For Media / ESA". Esa.int. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  47. "ESA – About ESA – Cyprus signs Cooperation Agreement". Esa.int. 27 August 2009. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
  48. 3 October 1990 for East Germany
  49. Though a member of the CSDP, Malta does not participate in the Eurocorps, EGF, or EU BGs.
  50. Malta considers token part in EU 'battle groups'. Timesofmalta.com (23 November 2004). Retrieved on 2013-07-19.
  51. Polska dołączy do ważnego europejskiego klubu". Wojskowego Archived 4 December 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  52. accession suspended (1962 and 1967). Then rejected in two referendums (1972 and 1994)
  53. "Iceland withdraws EU accession bid | News | DW.COM | 12.03.2015". Dw.de. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  54. "Retrait de la demande d'adhesion de la Suisse a l'UE" (PDF). Swiss Federal Council. 27 July 2016. Retrieved 13 September 2016.
  55. "Trade – Switzerland". European Commission. Retrieved 15 September 2012.
  56. "EU Battle Group, including Macedonian army troops, ends military exercise | Republika Online". English.republika.mk. 13 June 2014. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  57. "Andorra : Customs Unions and preferential arrangements". European Commission. Archived from the original on 26 October 2012. Retrieved 12 September 2012. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  58. "San Marino : Customs Unions and preferential arrangements". European Commission. Archived from the original on 26 October 2012. Retrieved 12 September 2012. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  59. "Trade : Turkey". European Commission. Retrieved 12 September 2012.
  60. "Turkey : Customs Unions and preferential arrangements". European Commission. Archived from the original on 30 July 2012. Retrieved 12 September 2012. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  61. ^ "Enlargement - Check current status". European Commission. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
  62. "European Commission : CORDIS : Search : Simple". Cordis.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 28 March 2008. Retrieved 16 December 2017. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  63. "Armenia president and European Commission official discuss EU-Armenia talks". 3 February 2017.
  64. "Initial Agreement Reached To Establish Parliamentary Assembly Of European Parliament's Eastern Neighbors". Archived from the original on 15 June 2011. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  65. "How Could America Approach the European Union?" (PDF). Libertas-institut.com. Retrieved 16 December 2017.
  66. "New concept of the Russian foreign policy: from Vancouver to Vladivostok?". Geopolitika.lt. Retrieved 20 April 2011.
  67. Socor, Vladimir. "The Jamestown Foundation: Medvedev Proposes All-European Security Pact During Berlin Visit". Web.archive.org. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  68. "Medvedev and the new European security architecture". Opendemocracy.net. Retrieved 16 December 2017.
  69. "The draft of the European Security Treaty". Eng.news.kremlin.ru. 29 November 2009. Retrieved 20 April 2011.
  70. "Главная". Mid.ru. Retrieved 16 December 2017.
  71. "Russia proposes new Euro-Atlantic security treaty". Web.archive.org. 30 November 2009. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  72. "Sarkozy wants new EU-US-Russia security accord". Euobserver.com. Retrieved 16 December 2017.
  73. "Sarkozy backs Russian calls for pan-European security pact". Theguardian.com. 15 November 2008. Retrieved 16 December 2017. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  74. "France's Sarkozy supports Russian-European security plan". En.rian.ru. Retrieved 16 December 2017.
  75. "Sarkozy to push for Russia-EU security deal". English.ruvr.ru. Archived from the original on 18 March 2012. Retrieved 16 December 2017. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  76. Erlanger, Steven; Bennhold, Katrin (1 October 2010). "Sarkozy to Propose New Bond With Russia". Nytimes.com. Retrieved 16 December 2017.
  77. "France's Sarkozy supports Russian-European security plan". En.rian.ru. 19 June 2010. Retrieved 20 April 2011.
  78. "No need for new European security treaty - NATO chief". En.rian.ru. Retrieved 16 December 2017.
  79. Donahue, Patrick (25 November 2010). "Putin Promotes Trade Zone From 'Lisbon to Vladivostok'". Bloomberg. Retrieved 20 April 2011.
  80. sueddeutsche.de GmbH, Munich, Germany. "Von Lissabon bis Wladiwostok". Sueddeutsche.de. Retrieved 20 April 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  81. "From Lisbon to Vladivostok" (in German). Translate.google.de. Retrieved 20 April 2011.
  82. "Putin Envisions a Russia-EU Free Trade Zone". Der Spiegel. Retrieved 20 April 2011.
  83. "Russia and Europe: From an Analysis of Crisis Lessons to a New Partnership Agenda". Government.ru. 25 November 2010. Archived from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 20 April 2011. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  84. Armitstead, Louise (26 November 2010). "Putin: Russia will join the euro one day". The Daily Telegraph. UK. Retrieved 20 April 2011.
  85. "Nicolas Sarkozy believes the visa-free regime (EU-Russia) is possible in 10–15 years". Visahouse.com. 26 October 2010. Retrieved 20 April 2011.
  86. Evgeny Semenyako, Petr Barenboim, The Moscow-Bruges Concept of a Single Legal and Rule of Law Space for Europe and Russia, Justitceinform, Moscow, 2007, ISBN 978-5-7205-0911-8; Peter Barenboim, Naeem Sidiqi, Bruges, the Bridge between Civilizations: The 75 Anniversary of the Roerich Pact, Grid Belgium, 2010. ISBN 978-5-98856-114-9
  87. Sarkozy sounds out basis for Mediterranean Union Archived 11 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine Euractiv.com 16 July 2007. Retrieved 19 July 2007.
  88. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 14 October 2008. Retrieved 15 October 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link). Retrieved 15 October 2008.
  89. "afrol News - Morocco enters EU market". Afrol.com. Retrieved 16 December 2017.
  90. "Europe supports Morocco's EU partnership aspirations". Web.archive.org. 23 January 2008. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  91. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 6 January 2009. Retrieved 15 October 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link). Retrieved 15 October 2008.

Further reading

European Union Foreign relations of the European Union
Bilateral relations
See also: Economic relationships with third countries
Africa
Americas
Asia
Europe
Oceania
Former
General
  • †= Disputed state, may not be recognised as an independent state by some or all European Union members.
Multilateral relations and initiatives
Organisations
Initiatives
Administration and policies
Foreign and Security Policy
Administration
Funding
Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union
Leadership
Structure
External Action Service
Agencies
Council preparatory bodies
European Commission bodies
Funding
Policies
Equipment
Decorations
Related
European Union articles
History
Timeline
Predecessors
Defence policy
European Communities (1967–2009)
Central bank
Financial stability
Enlargements
Withdrawals
Geography
Bodies
Institutions
Legislature
Executive
Judiciary
Central bank
Supreme audit institution
Other
international-law
EU bodies
Independent
offices
Agencies
Advisory
bodies
Military
bodies
Law
Economy
Politics
Concepts
Policies
Foreign
relations
Culture
Lists
Europe articles
History
Chronology
By topic
Geography
Politics
Intergovernmental
European Union
Economy
Intergovernmental
Sovereign states by
Society
Culture
Demographics
European Union articles
History
Timeline
Predecessors
Defence policy
European Communities (1967–2009)
Central bank
Financial stability
Enlargements
Withdrawals
Geography
Bodies
Institutions
Legislature
Executive
Judiciary
Central bank
Supreme audit institution
Other
international-law
EU bodies
Independent
offices
Agencies
Advisory
bodies
Military
bodies
Law
Economy
Politics
Concepts
Policies
Foreign
relations
Culture
Lists
Forms of economic integration
Trade bloc
Economic union
Shared policies
Theory
Regions
History of Europe
Prehistory
Classical antiquity
Middle Ages
Modern period
See also
Categories: