This is an old revision of this page, as edited by D.Lazard (talk | contribs) at 13:44, 26 January 2024 (→Center: New section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:44, 26 January 2024 by D.Lazard (talk | contribs) (→Center: New section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Subset of a ring that forms a ring itselfThis article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (November 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Algebraic structure → Ring theory Ring theory |
---|
Basic conceptsRings
Related structures
|
Commutative algebraCommutative rings |
Noncommutative algebraNoncommutative rings
Noncommutative algebraic geometry Operator algebra |
In mathematics, a subring of R is a subset of a ring that is itself a ring when binary operations of addition and multiplication on R are restricted to the subset, and which shares the same multiplicative identity as R. (Note that a subset of a ring R need not be a ring.) For those who define rings without requiring the existence of a multiplicative identity, a subring of R is just a subset of R that is a ring for the operations of R (this does imply it contains the additive identity of R). The latter gives a strictly weaker condition, even for rings that do have a multiplicative identity, so that for instance all ideals become subrings (and they may have a multiplicative identity that differs from the one of R). With definition requiring a multiplicative identity (which is used in this article), the only ideal of R that is a subring of R is R itself.
Definition
A subring of a ring (R, +, ∗, 0, 1) is a subset S of R that preserves the structure of the ring, i.e. a ring (S, +, ∗, 0, 1) with S ⊆ R. Equivalently, it is both a subgroup of (R, +, 0) and a submonoid of (R, ∗, 1).
Examples
The ring and its quotients have no subrings (with multiplicative identity) other than the full ring.
Every ring has a unique smallest subring, isomorphic to some ring with n a nonnegative integer (see Characteristic). The integers correspond to n = 0 in this statement, since is isomorphic to .
Subring test
The subring test is a theorem that states that for any ring R, a subset S of R is a subring if and only if it contains the multiplicative identity of R, and is closed under multiplication and subtraction.
As an example, the ring Z of integers is a subring of the field of real numbers and also a subring of the ring of polynomials Z.
Center
The center of a ring is the set of the elements of the ring that commute with every other element of the ring. That is, x belongs to the center of the ring R if for every
The center of a ring R is a subring of R, and R is an associative algebra over its center.
Ring extensions
Not to be confused with a ring-theoretic analog of a group extension.If S is a subring of a ring R, then equivalently R is said to be a ring extension of S, written as R/S in similar notation to that for field extensions.
Subring generated by a set
Let R be a ring. Any intersection of subrings of R is again a subring of R. Therefore, if X is any subset of R, the intersection of all subrings of R containing X is a subring S of R. S is the smallest subring of R containing X. ("Smallest" means that if T is any other subring of R containing X, then S is contained in T.) S is said to be the subring of R generated by X. If S = R, we may say that the ring R is generated by X.
Relation to ideals
Proper ideals are subrings (without unity) that are closed under both left and right multiplication by elements of R.
If one omits the requirement that rings have a unity element, then subrings need only be non-empty and otherwise conform to the ring structure, and ideals become subrings. Ideals may or may not have their own multiplicative identity (distinct from the identity of the ring):
- The ideal I = {(z,0) | z in Z} of the ring Z × Z = {(x,y) | x,y in Z} with componentwise addition and multiplication has the identity (1,0), which is different from the identity (1,1) of the ring. So I is a ring with unity, and a "subring-without-unity", but not a "subring-with-unity" of Z × Z.
- The proper ideals of Z have no multiplicative identity.
See also
Notes
References
- Adamson, Iain T. (1972). Elementary rings and modules. University Mathematical Texts. Oliver and Boyd. pp. 14–16. ISBN 0-05-002192-3.
- Dummit, David Steven; Foote, Richard Martin (2004). Abstract algebra (Third ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-43334-9.
- Lang, Serge (2002). Algebra (3 ed.). New York. ISBN 978-0387953854.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Sharpe, David (1987). Rings and factorization. Cambridge University Press. pp. 15–17. ISBN 0-521-33718-6.