Revision as of 20:59, 10 January 2013 view sourceDelphi234 (talk | contribs)1,478 edits →Distribution of wind speed: add ref← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:38, 29 December 2024 view source Citation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,438,020 edits Added bibcode. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Dominic3203 | Category:Bright green environmentalism | #UCB_Category 11/26 | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Electrical power generation from wind}} | |||
{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}} | |||
{{redirect|Wind energy|the academic journal|Wind Energy (journal)}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2012}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2020}} | |||
] | |||
], China]] | |||
{{Renewable energy sources}} | |||
] | |||
{{sustainable energy}} | |||
'''Wind power''' is the |
'''Wind power''' is the use of ] energy to generate useful work. Historically, wind power was used by ], ]s and ]s, but today it is mostly used to generate electricity. This article deals only with wind power for electricity generation. | ||
Today, wind power is generated almost completely with ]s, generally grouped into ] and connected to the ]. | |||
In 2022, wind supplied over 2,304 ] of electricity, which was 7.8% of world electricity.<ref name=ember2024/> | |||
Large ]s consist of hundreds of individual ]s which are connected to the ] network. Offshore wind farms can harness more frequent and powerful winds than are available to land-based installations and have less visual impact on the landscape but construction costs are considerably higher. Small onshore wind facilities are used to provide electricity to isolated locations and utility companies increasingly ] produced by small domestic wind turbines.<ref name="Wind Energy">{{cite journal|last=Gipe|first=Paul|title=The Wind Industry's Experience with Aesthetic Criticism|publisher=Leonardo|jstor=1575818}}</ref> | |||
With about 100 ] added during 2021, mostly ] and the ], global installed wind power capacity exceeded 800 GW.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|title=Wind Power – Analysis|url=https://www.iea.org/reports/wind-power|access-date=2021-11-23|website=IEA|language=en-GB|archive-date=23 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211123010357/https://www.iea.org/reports/wind-power|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title=Wind energy generation vs. installed capacity|url=https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/wind-energy-consumption-vs-installed-wind-energy-capacity|access-date=2021-11-23|website=Our World in Data|archive-date=19 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211019062311/https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/wind-energy-consumption-vs-installed-wind-energy-capacity|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-03-25 |title=Global wind industry breezes into new record |url=https://www.energylivenews.com/2022/03/25/global-wind-industry-breezes-into-new-record/ |access-date=2022-04-02 |website=Energy Live News |language=en-US}}</ref> 32 countries generated more than a tenth of their electricity from wind power in 2023 and wind generation has nearly tripled since 2015.<ref name=ember2024>{{Cite web |date=2024-05-07 |title=Global Electricity Review 2024 |url=https://ember-climate.org/insights/research/global-electricity-review-2024/ |access-date=2024-09-02 |website=Ember |language=en-US}}</ref> To help meet the ] goals to ], analysts say it should expand much faster – by over 1% of electricity generation per year.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|title=Expansion of wind and solar power too slow to stop climate change|url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/10/211014141949.htm|access-date=2021-11-24|website=ScienceDaily|language=en}}</ref> | |||
Wind power is considered a ], ] source, and has a much smaller ] compared to burning ]s. Wind power is ], so it needs ] or other ] energy sources to attain a reliable supply of electricity. Land-based (onshore) wind farms have a greater visual impact on the landscape than most other power stations per energy produced.<ref name="grantham">{{cite web|url=http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/faqs/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-onshore-wind-energy|title=What are the pros and cons of onshore wind energy?|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190622123816/http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/faqs/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-onshore-wind-energy/ |date=2018-01-12|archive-date=22 June 2019|work=Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="energyfootprint">{{cite journal|first1=Nathan F.|last1=Jones|first2=Liba|last2=Pejchar|first3=Joseph M.|last3=Kiesecker|doi=10.1093/biosci/biu224|title=The Energy Footprint: How Oil, Natural Gas, and Wind Energy Affect Land for Biodiversity and the Flow of Ecosystem Services|journal=]|volume=65|issue=3|date=2015-01-22|access-date=2022-11-09|pages=290–301|url=https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/65/3/290/236920|doi-access=free|issn=0006-3568}}</ref> ] have less visual impact and have higher ]s, although they are generally more expensive.<ref name=":1" /> Offshore wind power currently has a share of about 10% of new installations.<ref>{{cite web |date=19 March 2020 |title=Global Wind Report 2019 |url=https://gwec.net/global-wind-report-2019/ |access-date=28 March 2020 |publisher=Global Wind Energy Council}}</ref> | |||
Wind power, as an alternative to ]s, is plentiful, ], widely distributed, ], produces no ] emissions during operation and uses little land.<ref name="landuse">{{cite doi|10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.017}}</ref> Any ] are generally less problematic than those from other power sources. As of 2011, Denmark is generating more than a quarter of its electricity from wind. 83 countries around the world are using wind power on a commercial basis.<ref name=ren212011/> In 2010 wind energy production was over 2.5% of total worldwide electricity usage, and growing rapidly at more than 25% per annum. The monetary cost per unit of energy produced is similar to the cost for new coal and natural gas installations.<ref name="eiadoe"/> Although wind power is a popular form of energy generation, the construction of wind farms is not universally welcomed due to ].<ref name=mar/><ref>{{cite web|title=Carbon footprint of electricity generation|publisher=UK Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology|date=October 2006|url=http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/postpn268.pdf|location=Postnote Number 268|accessdate=7 April 2012}}</ref><ref name=com/><ref name=vipublic/><ref name=eon/><ref name=thefacts/><ref name=pollingreport>{{cite web|url=http://www.pollingreport.com/energy.htm|title=Energy|accessdate=31 October 2012}}</ref> | |||
Wind power is one of the lowest-cost electricity sources per unit of energy produced. | |||
Wind power is very consistent from year to year but has significant variation over shorter time scales. The ] of wind seldom creates problems when used to supply up to 20% of total electricity demand,<ref name="ieawind"/> but as the proportion increases, a need to upgrade the grid, and a lowered ability to supplant conventional production can occur.<ref name="claverton-energy.com"/> Power management techniques such as having excess capacity storage, dispatchable backing sources, storage such as ], exporting and importing power to neighboring areas or reducing demand when wind production is low, can greatly mitigate these problems.<ref name="eirgrid impact"/> | |||
In many locations, new ]s are cheaper than new ] or ].<ref name=":6" /> | |||
Regions in the higher northern and southern latitudes have the highest potential for wind power.<ref>{{cite web |title=Global Wind Atlas |url=http://science.globalwindatlas.info/datasets.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200224101415/http://science.globalwindatlas.info/datasets.html |archive-date=24 February 2020 |access-date=28 March 2020 |publisher=DTU Technical University of Denmark}}</ref> In most regions, wind power generation is higher in nighttime, and in winter when ] output is low. For this reason, combinations of wind and solar power are suitable in many countries.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Nyenah |first1=Emmanuel |last2=Sterl |first2=Sebastian |last3=Thiery |first3=Wim |date=2022-05-01 |title=Pieces of a puzzle: solar-wind power synergies on seasonal and diurnal timescales tend to be excellent worldwide |journal=Environmental Research Communications |volume=4 |issue=5 |pages=055011 |doi=10.1088/2515-7620/ac71fb |bibcode=2022ERCom...4e5011N |s2cid=249227821 |issn=2515-7620|doi-access=free }}</ref> | |||
== History == | |||
{{Main|History of wind power}} | |||
== Wind energy resources == | |||
===Mechanical power=== | |||
] (DTU) | access-date=23 November 2021 | archive-date=18 January 2019 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190118095006/https://www.globalwindatlas.info/ | url-status=live }}</ref>]] | |||
]]] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
Wind is air movement in the Earth's atmosphere. In a unit of time, say 1 second, the volume of air that had passed an area <math>A</math> is <math>Av</math>. If the air density is <math>\rho</math> , the mass of this volume of air is <math>M=\rho Av</math>, and the power transfer, or energy transfer per second is <math>P =\tfrac {1}{2}M v^{2}= \tfrac {1}{2}\rho A v^{3}</math>. Wind power is thus ''proportional'' to the ''third power'' of the wind speed; the available power increases eightfold when the wind speed doubles. Change of wind speed by a factor of 2.1544 increases the wind power by one order of magnitude (multiply by 10). | |||
The global wind kinetic energy averaged approximately 1.50 MJ/m<sup>2</sup> over the period from 1979 to 2010, 1.31 MJ/m<sup>2</sup> in the Northern Hemisphere with 1.70 MJ/m<sup>2</sup> in the Southern Hemisphere. The atmosphere acts as a thermal engine, absorbing heat at higher temperatures, releasing heat at lower temperatures. The process is responsible for the production of wind kinetic energy at a rate of 2.46 W/m<sup>2</sup> thus sustaining the circulation of the atmosphere against friction.<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/13919173/A%2032-year%20Perspective%20on%20the%20Origin%20of%20Wind%20Energy%20in%20a%20warming%20Climate.pdf?sequence=1|title=A 32-year perspective on the origin of wind energy in a warming climate|journal=Renewable Energy|volume=77|pages=482–92|year=2015|doi=10.1016/j.renene.2014.12.045|last1=Huang|first1=Junling|last2=McElroy|first2=Michael B|bibcode=2015REne...77..482H |s2cid=109273683 |access-date=6 February 2015|archive-date=6 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150206044746/http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/13919173/A%2032-year%20Perspective%20on%20the%20Origin%20of%20Wind%20Energy%20in%20a%20warming%20Climate.pdf?sequence=1|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
] and ]s have been using wind power for thousands of years, and architects have used wind-driven ] in buildings since similarly ancient times. The use of wind to provide mechanical power came somewhat later in antiquity. The windwheel of the Greek engineer ] in the 1st century AD is the earliest known instance of using a wind-driven wheel to power a machine.<ref name="Lohrmann 10f.">Dietrich Lohrmann, "Von der östlichen zur westlichen Windmühle", ''Archiv für Kulturgeschichte'', Vol. 77, Issue 1 (1995), pp.1–30 (10f.)</ref><ref name="Drachmann">A.G. Drachmann, "Heron's Windmill", ''Centaurus'', 7 (1961), pp. 145–151</ref> | |||
Through ], it is possible to estimate wind power potential globally, ] or region, or for a specific site. The ] provided by the ] in partnership with the ] provides a global assessment of wind power potential.<ref name="global_wind_atlas" /><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180925180559/https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2017/11/28/mapping-the-worlds-wind-energy-potential |date=25 September 2018 }} '']'', 28 November 2017.</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180925180408/http://www.vindenergi.dtu.dk/english/news/2017/11/new-global-wind-atlas-to-be-presented-at-windeurope-conference |date=25 September 2018 }} '']'', 21 November 2017.</ref> | |||
The first windmills were in use in Iran at least by the 9th century and possibly as early as the 7th century.<ref name="Lucas2006a">], ] (1986). ''Islamic Technology: An illustrated history'', p. 54. ]. ISBN 0-521-42239-6.</ref> | |||
Unlike 'static' wind resource atlases which average estimates of wind speed and power density across multiple years, tools such as ] provide time-varying simulations of wind speed and power output from different wind turbine models at an hourly resolution.<ref>{{cite journal|last1= Staffell |first1= Iain |last2= Pfenninger |first2= Stefan |title=Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output|date=1 November 2016|journal= Energy |volume = 114 |pages = 1224–39 |doi = 10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.068|doi-access = free|bibcode= 2016Ene...114.1224S |hdl= 20.500.11850/120087 |hdl-access= free }}</ref> More detailed, site-specific assessments of wind resource potential can be obtained from specialist commercial providers, and many of the larger wind developers have in-house modeling capabilities. | |||
The use of windmills became widespread use across the Middle East and Central Asia, and later spread to China and India.<ref name="Meri2005">], "Mechanical Engineering in the Medieval Near East", ''Scientific American'', May 1991, p. 64-69. (cf. ], )</ref> By 1000 AD, windmills were used to pump seawater for salt-making in China and Sicily.<ref name=Kurlansky2002>Mark Kurlansky, ''Salt: a world history'',Penguin Books, London 2002 ISBN 0-14-200161-9, pg. 419</ref> Windmills were used extensively in Northwestern Europe to grind flour from the 1180s,<ref name="Meri2005">Dietrich Lohrmann, "Von der östlichen zur westlichen Windmühle", ''Archiv für Kulturgeschichte'', Vol. 77, Issue 1 (1995), pp.1–30 (18ff.)</ref> and ] were used to drain land for agriculture and for building.<ref name="Brief History">{{cite web|url=http://www.windmillersgazette.com/history.html|title=Brief History of Windmills in the New World|publisher=Windmillers' Gazette|author=Baker, T. Lindsay|accessdate=31 October 2012}}</ref> Early immigrants to the ] brought the technology with them from Europe.<ref name="Brief History"/> | |||
The total amount of economically extractable power available from the wind is considerably more than present human power use from all sources.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.claverton-energy.com/how-much-wind-energy-is-there-brian-hurley-wind-site-evaluation-ltd.html|title=How Much Wind Energy is there?|last=Hurley|first=Brian|publisher=Claverton Group|access-date=8 April 2012|archive-date=15 May 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120515154047/http://www.claverton-energy.com/how-much-wind-energy-is-there-brian-hurley-wind-site-evaluation-ltd.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The strength of wind varies, and an average value for a given location does not alone indicate the amount of energy a wind turbine could produce there. | |||
In the US, the development of the water-pumping windmill was the major factor in allowing the farming and ranching of vast areas otherwise devoid of readily accessible water. Windpumps contributed to the expansion of rail transport systems throughout the world, by pumping water from water wells for ]s.<ref name="mysanantantonio"/> The multi-bladed wind turbine atop a lattice tower made of wood or steel was a century a fixture of the landscape throughout rural America.<ref></ref> | |||
To assess prospective wind power sites, a probability distribution function is often fit to the observed wind speed data.<ref>{{cite journal | url= http://www.savenkov.org/publications/Savenkov_on_the_truncated_weibull_distribution_2009.pdf |author=Savenkov, M |year=2009 |title=On the truncated weibull distribution and its usefulness in evaluating potential wind (or wave) energy sites |journal=University Journal of Engineering and Technology |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=21–25 |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150222120957/http://www.savenkov.org/publications/Savenkov_on_the_truncated_weibull_distribution_2009.pdf |archive-date=22 February 2015}}</ref> Different locations will have different wind speed distributions. The ] model closely mirrors the actual distribution of hourly/ten-minute wind speeds at many locations. The Weibull factor is often close to 2 and therefore a ] can be used as a less accurate, but simpler model.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://xn--drmstrre-64ad.dk/wp-content/wind/miller/windpower%20web/en/tour/wres/weibull.htm | title=Describing Wind Variations: Weibull Distribution | publisher=Danish Wind Industry Association | access-date=8 July 2021 | archive-date=2 August 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210802193222/http://xn--drmstrre-64ad.dk/wp-content/wind/miller/windpower%20web/en/tour/wres/weibull.htm | url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Electrical power=== | |||
] | |||
In July 1887, a Scottish academic, Professor ], built a cloth-sailed wind turbine in the garden of his holiday cottage in Marykirk and used the electricity it produced to charge ] which he used to power the lights in his cottage.<ref name="Courier">{{cite web|url=http://www.thecourier.co.uk/Community/Heritage-and-History/article/2332/renewable-energy-and-role-of-marykirk-s-james-blyth.html|title=Renewable energy and role of Marykirk's James Blyth|last=Hardy|first=Chris|date=6 July 2010|work=The Courier|publisher=D. C. Thomson & Co. Ltd.|accessdate=12 December 2010}}</ref> His experiments culminated in a UK patent in 1891.<ref name="Price"/> In the winter of 1887/8 US inventor ] produced electricity using a wind powered generator which powered his home and laboratory until about 1900. In the 1890s, the Danish scientist and inventor ] constructed wind turbines to generate electricity, which was used to produce ] and ] by ] and a mixture of the two gases was stored for use as a fuel.<ref name="Price"/> La Cour was the first to discover that fast rotating wind turbines with fewer rotor blades were the most efficient in generating electricity and in 1904 he founded the Society of Wind Electricians.<ref name="Nixon">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/oct/17/wind-power-renewable-energy|title=Timeline: The history of wind power|last=NIxon|first=Niki|date=17 October 2008|work=The Guardian |publisher=Guardian News and Media Limited|accessdate=10 April 2012}}</ref> | |||
By the mid-1920s, 1 to 3-kilowatt wind generators developed by companies such as ] and Jacobs Wind-electric found widespread use in the rural areas of the midwestern Great Plains of the US but by the 1940s the demand for more power and the coming of the electrical grid throughout those areas made these small generators obsolete.<ref name="Dodge">{{cite web|url=http://telosnet.com/wind/20th.html|title=Part 2 – 20th Century Developments|last=Dodge|first=Darrell M.|work=Illustrated history of wind power development|publisher=TelosNet Web Development|accessdate=10 April 2012}}</ref> | |||
IN 1931 the French aeronautical engineer, ] was granted a patent for the ] which used ]s to create rotation<ref name="NTNU">{{cite web|url=http://www.ivt.ntnu.no/offshore2/?page_id=266#14|title=The historical development of the wind turbine|last=Anon|work=NTNU environmental studies: Wind power|publisher=NTNU|accessdate=7 January 2013}}</ref> and a 100 kW precursor to the modern horizontal wind generator was used in Yalta, in the USSR. In 1956 Johannes Juul,<sup><small>(])</small></sup> a former student of la Cour, built a 200 kW, three-bladed turbine at Gedser in Denmark, which influenced the design of many later turbines.<ref name="Nixon"/> | |||
In 1975 the ] funded a project to develop utility-scale wind turbines. The ] project built thirteen experimental turbines which paved the way for much of the technology used today.<ref name="Nixon"/> Since then, turbines have increased greatly in size with the ] capable of delivering up to 7.5 ].<ref group="nb">Wind turbine power output is measured in ] (kW) or megawatts (MW), and energy output in MWh, GWh, or TWh, ], Gigawatt hours or Terawatt hours. One Gigawatt hour is one million kilowatt hours, and one Terawatt hour is a billion kilowatt hours.</ref> Wind turbine production has expanded to many countries and wind power is expected to grow worldwide in the twenty-first century.<ref name="quest"/> | |||
==Wind energy== | |||
]. Color codes indicate wind power density class. (click to see larger)]] | |||
Wind energy is the ] of air in motion, also called ]. | |||
Total wind energy flowing through an imaginary area ''A'' during the time ''t'' is: | |||
:<math>E = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{1}{2}(Avt\rho)v^2 = \frac{1}{2}At\rho v^3,</math><ref name=physics></ref> | |||
where ''ρ'' is the ]; ''v'' is the wind ]; ''Avt'' is the volume of air passing through ''A'' (which is considered perpendicular to the direction of the wind); ''Avtρ'' is therefore the mass ''m'' passing per unit time. Note that ½ ''ρv''<sup>2</sup> is the kinetic energy of the moving air per unit volume. | |||
Power is energy per unit time, so the wind power incident on ''A'' (e.g. equal to the rotor area of a wind turbine) is: | |||
:<math>P = \frac{E}{t} = \frac{1}{2}A\rho v^3.</math><ref name=physics /> | |||
Wind power in an open air stream is thus ''proportional'' to the ''third power'' of the wind speed; the available power increases eightfold when the wind speed doubles. Wind turbines for grid electricity therefore need to be especially efficient at greater wind speeds. | |||
Wind is the movement of air across the surface of the Earth, affected by areas of high pressure and of low pressure.<ref name="what is wind?">{{cite web|url=http://www.bwea.com/edu/wind.html|title=What is wind?|last=Anon|year=2010|work=Renewable UK: Education and careers|publisher=Renewable UK|accessdate=9 April 2012}}</ref> The surface of the Earth is heated unevenly by the Sun, depending on factors such as the angle of incidence of the sun's rays at the surface (which differs with latitude and time of day) and whether the land is open or covered with vegetation. Also, large bodies of water, such as the oceans, heat up and cool down slower than the land. The heat energy absorbed at the Earth's surface is transferred to the air directly above it and, as warmer air is less dense than cooler air, it rises above the cool air to form areas of high pressure and thus pressure differentials. The rotation of the Earth drags the atmosphere around with it causing turbulence. These effects combine to cause a constantly varying pattern of winds across the surface of the Earth.<ref name="what is wind?"/> | |||
The total amount of economically extractable power available from the wind is considerably more than present human power use from all sources.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.claverton-energy.com/how-much-wind-energy-is-there-brian-hurley-wind-site-evaluation-ltd.html|title=How Much Wind Energy is there? – Brian Hurley – Wind Site Evaluation Ltd|last=Hurley|first=Brian|publisher=Claverton Group|accessdate=8 April 2012}}</ref> Axel Kleidon of the Max Planck Institute in Germany, carried out a "top down" calculation on how much wind energy there is, starting with the incoming solar radiation that drives the winds by creating temperature differences in the atmosphere. He concluded that somewhere between 18 TW and 68 TW could be extracted.<ref name=nsc2012/> Cristina Archer and ] presented a "bottom-up" estimate, which unlike Kleidon's are based on actual measurements of wind speeds, and found that there is 1700 TW of wind power at an altitude of 100 metres over land and sea. Of this, "between 72 and 170 TW could be extracted in a practical and cost-competitive manner".<ref name=nsc2012>{{cite web |url=http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328491.700-power-paradox-clean-might-not-be-green-forever.html?full=true&print=true |title=Power paradox: Clean might not be green forever |author=Anil Ananthaswamy and Michael Le Page |date=30 January 2012 |work=New Scientist }}</ref> | |||
=== Distribution of wind speed === | |||
] | |||
The strength of wind varies, and an average value for a given location does not alone indicate the amount of energy a wind turbine could produce there. To assess the frequency of wind speeds at a particular location, a probability distribution function is often fit to the observed data. Different locations will have different wind speed distributions. The ] model closely mirrors the actual distribution of hourly wind speeds at many locations. The Weibull factor is often close to 2 and therefore a ] can be used as a less accurate, but simpler model.<ref></ref> | |||
=== High altitude winds === | |||
Power generation from winds usually comes from winds very close to the surface of the earth. Winds at higher altitudes are stronger and more consistent. Recent years have seen significant advances in technologies meant to ]. | |||
== Wind farms == | == Wind farms == | ||
{{main|Wind farm|List of onshore wind farms}} | |||
] in Scotland]] | |||
{{Main|Wind farm}} | |||
{| class="wikitable floatright sortable" | |||
A wind farm is a group of ]s in the same location used for production of electricity. A large wind farm may consist of several hundred individual wind turbines, and cover an extended area of hundreds of square miles, but the land between the turbines may be used for agricultural or other purposes. A wind farm may also be located offshore. | |||
|+ Large onshore wind farms | |||
Almost all large wind turbines have the same design — a horizontal axis wind turbine having an upwind rotor with three blades, attached to a nacelle on top of a tall tubular tower. In a ], individual turbines are interconnected with a medium voltage (often 34.5 kV), power collection system and communications network. At a substation, this medium-voltage electric current is increased in voltage with a ] for connection to the high voltage ] system. | |||
Many of the largest operational onshore wind farms are located in the US. As of 2012, the ] is the largest onshore wind farm in the world at 1020 MW, followed by the ] (845 MW), and the ] (781.5 MW). As of November 2010, the ] in the UK is the largest offshore wind farm in the world at 300 MW, followed by ] (209 MW) in Denmark. | |||
There are many large wind farms under construction including; ] (1000 MW), ] (400 MW), ] (317 MW), ], ] (548 MW), ] (500 MW), ] (420 MW), ] (845 MW), ] (343 MW) and ] (367 MW). | |||
=== Feeding into grid === | |||
]s, often used for wind power, require ] for ] so ] used in wind-power collection systems include substantial ] banks for ].<ref> p.17</ref> Different types of wind turbine generators behave differently during transmission grid disturbances, so ] of the dynamic electromechanical characteristics of a new wind farm is required by transmission system operators to ensure predictable stable behaviour during system faults (see: ]). In particular, induction generators cannot support the system voltage during faults, unlike steam or hydro turbine-driven synchronous generators. ] generally have more desirable properties for grid interconnection.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Greening of IT: How Companies Can Make a Difference for the Environment|last=Lamb|first=John|year=2009|page=261|isbn=ISBN 978-0-13-715083-0}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Alternative Energy Technologies|last=Castellano|first=Robert|year=2012|page=26|isbn=ISBN 978-2813000767}}</ref> Transmission systems operators will supply a wind farm developer with a ''grid code'' to specify the requirements for interconnection to the transmission grid. This will include ], constancy of ] and dynamic behavior of the wind farm turbines during a system fault.<ref name="Demeo2005"/><ref name="Zavadil2005"/> | |||
===Offshore wind power=== | |||
{{Main|Offshore wind power}} | |||
], Sweden]] | |||
Offshore wind power refers to the construction of wind farms in large bodies of water to generate electricity. These installations can utilise the more frequent and powerful winds that are available in these locations and have less aesthetic impact on the landscape than land based projects. However, the construction and the maintenance costs are considerably higher.<ref name="Hulazan">{{cite web|url=http://www.renewables-info.com/drawbacks_and_benefits/offshore_wind_power_%E2%80%93_advantages_and_disadvantages.html|title=Offshore wind power – Advantages and disadvantages |last=Hulazan|first=Ned|date=16 February 2011|publisher=Renewable Energy Articles|accessdate=9 April 2012}}</ref><ref name="Millborrow">{{cite web|url=http://www.windpowermonthly.com/go/europe/news/1021043/Cutting-cost-offshore-wind-energy/|title=Cutting the cost of offshore wind energy|last=Millborrow|first=David|date=6 August 2010|work=Wind Power Monthly|publisher=Haymarket|accessdate=10 April 2012}}</ref> As of 2011, offshore wind farms were at least 3 times more expensive than onshore wind farms of the same nominal power<ref name="Jamieson"/> but these costs are expected to fall as the industry matures.<ref name="Bloomberg">{{cite web|url=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-09/wind-power-seen-surging-as-custom-barges-cut-set-up-costs.html|title=Wind Power Seen Surging as Custom Barges Cut Set-up Costs|last= Morales |first=Alex|last2=Bakewell|first2=Sally |date=10 April 2012|work=Blloomberg News|publisher=Bloomberg L.P. |accessdate=10 April 2012}}</ref> | |||
] and ] are the leading turbine suppliers for offshore wind power. ], ] and ] are the leading offshore operators.<ref name=btm2010o/> As of October 2010, 3.16 GW of offshore wind power capacity was operational, mainly in Northern Europe. According to ], more than 16 GW of additional capacity will be installed before the end of 2014 and the UK and Germany will become the two leading markets. Offshore wind power capacity is expected to reach a total of 75 GW worldwide by 2020, with significant contributions from China and the US.<ref name="btm2010o"/> | |||
== Wind power capacity and production == | |||
{{Main|Wind power by country}} | |||
])<ref name="gws-2011" />]] | |||
] | |||
Worldwide there are now over two hundred thousand wind turbines operating, with a total ] of 238,351 MW as of end 2011.<ref name="global council"/> The ] alone passed some 100,000 MW nameplate capacity in September 2012,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Energy-Resources/2012/10/01/EU-wind-power-capacity-reaches-100GW/UPI-52431349087400/|title=EU wind power capacity reaches 100GW|date=1 October 2012|publisher=UPI|accessdate=31 October 2012}}</ref> while the United States surpassed 50,000 MW in August 2012 and ] passed 50,000 MW the same month.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2012-08/16/content_15680451.htm|title=China's on-grid wind power capacity grows|publisher=China Daily|date=16 August 2012|accessdate=31 October 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://cleantechnica.com/2012/08/10/us-reaches-50-gw-of-wind-energy-capacity-in-q2-of-2012/|title=US Reaches 50 GW of Wind Energy Capacity in Q2 of 2012|publisher=Clean Technica|date=10 August 2012|accessdate=31 October 2012}}</ref> World wind generation capacity more than quadrupled between 2000 and 2006, doubling about every three years. ] and led the world in installed capacity in the 1980s and into the 1990s. In 1997 German installed capacity surpassed the U.S. and led until once again overtaken by the U.S. in 2008. China has been rapidly expanding its wind installations in the late 2000s and passed the U.S. in 2010 to become the world leader. | |||
At the end of 2011, worldwide ] of wind-powered generators was 238 ]s (GW), growing by 40.5 GW over the preceding year.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gwec.net/global-figures/wind-energy-global-status/|title=Global status overview|publisher=GWEC|accessdate=31 October 2012}}</ref> According to the ], an industry organization, in 2010 wind power generated 430 TWh or about 2.5% of worldwide electricity usage,<ref name="wwea"/> up from 1.5% in 2008 and 0.1% in 1997.<ref name="wor"/> Between 2005 and 2010 the average annual growth in new installations was 27.6 percent.<ref name=re/> Wind power market penetration is expected to reach 3.35 percent by 2013 and 8 percent by 2018.<ref name=re /><ref name=bt /> Several countries have already achieved relatively high levels of penetration, such as 28% of stationary (grid) electricity production in ] (2011),<ref name="Elstat">{{cite web|url=http://www.ens.dk/da-DK/Info/TalOgKort/Statistik_og_noegletal/Maanedsstatistik/Documents/El-maanedsstatistik.xls|title=Månedlig elforsyningsstatistik|location=summary tab B58-B72|publisher='']''|date=18 January 2012|accessdate=11 March 2012}} {{da icon}}</ref> 19% in ] (2011),<ref name="renPT2011">{{cite web|url=http://www.centrodeinformacao.ren.pt/EN/InformacaoExploracao/Pages/EstatisticaMensal.aspx|title=Monthly Statistics – SEN|date=Feb 2012}}</ref> 16% in ] (2011),<ref name="ree2011prelim">{{cite web|url=http://www.ree.es/ingles/sistema_electrico/pdf/infosis/Avance_REE_2011_ingles.pdf | title= the Spanish electricity system: preliminary report 2011| date=Jan 2012|page=13}}</ref> 14% in ] (2010)<ref name="eirgrid renewables"/> and 8% in ] (2011).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bmwi.de/Dateien/BMWi/PDF/energiewende-in-deutschland,property=pdf,bereich=bmwi,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf | title=Die Energiewende in Deutschland | date=Feb 2012 | author=]|location=Berlin|page=4}} {{de icon}}</ref> As of 2011, 83 countries around the world were using wind power on a commercial basis.<ref name=ren212011/> | |||
] accounted for 48% of the world total wind power generation capacity in 2009. In 2010, Spain became Europe's leading producer of wind energy, achieving 42,976 GWh. Germany held the top spot in Europe in terms of installed capacity, with a total of 27,215 MW as of 31 December 2010.<ref name="eolicenergynews4082"/> | |||
<center> | |||
{| class="wikitable | |||
| | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | |||
|+Top 10 countries<br>by nameplate windpower capacity<br>(2011 year-end)<ref name=gws-2011>{{cite web|title=GWEC Global Wind Statistics 2011|url=http://gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/GWEC_-_Global_Wind_Statistics_2011.pdf|format=pdf|publisher=Global Wind Energy Commission|accessdate=15 March 2012}}</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Wind farm | |||
! Country !! Windpower capacity<br/>(]) <small><sup>ǂ</sup>provisional</small> !! % world total | |||
! Capacity<br />(]) | |||
! Country | |||
! class="unsortable" | Refs | |||
|- | |- | ||
| ] || align="center" | 7,965 || {{Flagu|China}} || <ref>Watts, Jonathan & Huang, Cecily. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130615063412/http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/19/china-windfarms-renewable-energy |date=15 June 2013 }}, '']'', 19 March 2012, revised on 20 March 2012. Retrieved 4 January 2012.</ref> | |||
| ] ||align=center| 62,733<small><sup>ǂ</sup></small> ||align=center| 26.3 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| ]|| align="center" | 1,500 || {{Flagu|India}} || <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thewindpower.net/windfarm_en_449.php|title=Muppandal (India)|publisher=thewindpower.net|access-date=21 November 2015|archive-date=14 August 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140814194848/http://www.thewindpower.net/windfarm_en_449.php|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
| ] ||align=center| 46,919 ||align=center| 19.7 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| ] || align="center" | 1,320 || {{Flagu|United States}} ||<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120510173856/http://www.terra-genpower.com/News/Terra-Gen-Power-Announces-Closing-of-%24650-Million-.aspx |date=10 May 2012}}, 17 April 2012</ref> | |||
| ] ||align=center| 29,060 ||align=center| 12.2 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| ] || align="center" | 1,064 || {{Flagu|India}} ||<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121001062608/http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/suzlon-creates-country/s-largest-wind-park/164779/on |date=1 October 2012 }}. Business-standard.com (11 May 2012). Retrieved on 20 July 2016.</ref> | |||
| ] ||align=center| 21,674 ||align=center| 9.1 | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||align=center| 16,084 ||align=center| 6.7 | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||align=center| 6,800<small><sup>ǂ</sup></small> ||align=center| 2.8 | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||align=center| 6,747 ||align=center| 2.8 | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||align=center| 6,540 ||align=center| 2.7 | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||align=center| 5,265 ||align=center| 2.2 | |||
|- | |||
| ] ||align=center| 4,083 ||align=center| 1.7 | |||
|- | |||
| (]) ||align=center| 32,446 ||align=center| 13.8 | |||
|- | |||
|align=center| '''World total''' ||align=center| '''238,351 MW''' ||align=center| '''100%''' | |||
|} | |} | ||
|| | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+Top 10 countries<br>by windpower electricity production<br>(2010 totals)<ref name="energies-renouvelables.org-13thEdition">{{cite web|publisher=Observ'ER|url=http://www.energies-renouvelables.org/observ-er/html/inventaire/pdf/13e-inventaire-Chap02.pdf|location=2.2 Electricity Production From Wind Sources: Main Wind Power Producing Countries – 2010 (text & table)|title=Worldwide Electricity Production From Renewable Energy Sources: Stats and Figures Series: Thirteenth Inventory – Edition 2011|accessdate=29 March 2012}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
! Country !! Windpower production<br/>(]) !! % world total | |||
|- | |||
| United States ||align=center| 95.2 ||align=center| 27.6 | |||
|- | |||
| China ||align=center| 55.5 ||align=center| 15.9 | |||
|- | |||
| Spain ||align=center| 43.7 ||align=center| 12.7 | |||
|- | |||
| Germany ||align=center| 36.5 ||align=center| 10.6 | |||
|- | |||
| India ||align=center| 20.6 ||align=center| 6.0 | |||
|- | |||
| United Kingdom ||align=center| 10.2 ||align=center| 3.0 | |||
|- | |||
| France ||align=center| 9.7 ||align=center| 2.8 | |||
|- | |||
| Portugal ||align=center| 9.1 ||align=center| 2.6 | |||
|- | |||
| Italy ||align=center| 8.4 ||align=center| 2.5 | |||
|- | |||
| Canada ||align=center| 8.0 ||align=center| 2.3 | |||
|- | |||
| (rest of world) ||align=center| 48.5 ||align=center| 14.1 | |||
|- | |||
|align=center| '''World total''' ||align=center| '''344.8 TWh''' ||align=center| '''100%''' | |||
|} | |||
|} | |||
</center> | |||
A wind farm is a group of ]s in the same location. A large wind farm may consist of several hundred individual wind turbines distributed over an extended area. The land between the turbines may be used for agricultural or other purposes. A wind farm may also be located offshore. Almost all large wind turbines have the same design — a horizontal axis wind turbine having an upwind rotor with 3 blades, attached to a ] on top of a tall tubular tower. | |||
=== Growth trends === | |||
, developments and prognosis. Data source: WWEA<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wwindea.org/|title=World Wind Energy Association|accessdate=31 October 2012}}</ref>]] | |||
] | |||
In a wind farm, individual turbines are interconnected with a medium voltage (often 34.5 kV) power collection system<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ewh.ieee.org/r3/atlanta/ias/Wind%20Farm%20Electrical%20Systems.pdf|title=Wind Farm Electrical Systems|access-date=2020-07-11|archive-date=18 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210318210221/https://ewh.ieee.org/r3/atlanta/ias/Wind%20Farm%20Electrical%20Systems.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> and communications network. In general, a distance of 7D (7 times the rotor diameter of the wind turbine) is set between each turbine in a fully developed wind farm.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Meyers|first1=Johan|last2=Meneveau|first2=Charles|date=1 March 2012|title=Optimal turbine spacing in fully developed wind farm boundary layers|journal=Wind Energy|volume=15|issue=2|pages=305–17|doi=10.1002/we.469|bibcode=2012WiEn...15..305M|url=https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/331240}}</ref> At a substation, this medium-voltage electric current is increased in voltage with a ] for connection to the high voltage ] system.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.windpowerengineering.com/projects/making-modern-offshore-substation/|title=Making of the modern offshore substation|website=Windpower Engineering & Development|language=en-US|access-date=14 June 2019|archive-date=24 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211124094304/https://www.windpowerengineering.com/making-modern-offshore-substation/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In 2010, more than half of all new wind power was added outside of the traditional markets in Europe and North America. This was largely from new construction in China, which accounted for nearly half the new wind installations (16.5 GW).<ref name="increasesBy2010"/> | |||
=== Generator characteristics and stability === | |||
Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC) figures show that 2007 recorded an increase of installed capacity of 20 GW, taking the total installed wind energy capacity to 94 GW, up from 74 GW in 2006. Despite constraints facing supply chains for wind turbines, the annual market for wind continued to increase at an estimated rate of 37%, following 32% growth in 2006. In terms of economic value, the wind energy sector has become one of the important players in the energy markets, with the total value of new generating equipment installed in 2007 reaching €25 billion, or US$36 billion.<ref name="gwec2007"/> | |||
Most modern turbines use variable speed generators combined with either a partial or full-scale power converter between the turbine generator and the collector system, which generally have more desirable properties for grid interconnection and have ]-capabilities.<ref name="huang">{{Cite book|last1=Falahi|first1=G.|last2=Huang|first2=A.|title=IECON 2014 – 40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society |chapter=Low voltage ride through control of modular multilevel converter based HVDC systems |date=1 October 2014|pages=4663–68|doi=10.1109/IECON.2014.7049205|isbn=978-1-4799-4032-5|s2cid=3598534}}</ref> Modern turbines use either ]s with partial-scale converters or squirrel-cage induction generators or synchronous generators (both permanently and electrically excited) with full-scale converters.<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1016/j.enconman.2014.08.037|title=The state of the art of wind energy conversion systems and technologies: A review|journal=Energy Conversion and Management|volume=88|page=332|year=2014|last1=Cheng|first1=Ming|last2=Zhu|first2=Ying|bibcode=2014ECM....88..332C }}</ref> ] is possible<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-11-03 |title=ScottishPower in 'pioneering world first' after wind farm black-out boost |url=https://www.scotsman.com/business/scottishpower-in-pioneering-world-first-after-wind-farm-black-out-boost-3023563 |access-date=2022-09-19 |website=www.scotsman.com |language=en}}</ref> and is being further developed for places (such as ]) which generate most of their electricity from wind.<ref>{{Cite web |title=As the grid adds wind power, researchers have to reengineer recovery from power outages |url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/05/220531181931.htm |access-date=2022-09-19 |website=ScienceDaily |language=en}}</ref> | |||
Although the ] was affected by the ] in 2009 and 2010, a ] five-year forecast up to 2013 projects substantial growth. Over the past five years the average growth in new installations has been 27.6 percent each year. In the forecast to 2013 the expected average annual growth rate is 15.7 percent.<ref name="re" /><ref name="bt" /> More than 200 GW of new wind power capacity could come on line before the end of 2013. Wind power market penetration is expected to reach 3.35 percent by 2013 and 8 percent by 2018.<ref name=re /><ref name=bt /> | |||
]s will supply a wind farm developer with a ] to specify the requirements for interconnection to the transmission grid. This will include the ], the constancy of ], and the dynamic behaviour of the wind farm turbines during a system fault.<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Demeo | first1 = E.A. | last2 = Grant | first2 = W. | last3 = Milligan | first3 = M.R. | last4 = Schuerger | first4 = M.J. | year = 2005 | title = Wind plant integration | journal = IEEE Power and Energy Magazine| volume = 3 | issue = 6 | pages = 38–46 | doi = 10.1109/MPAE.2005.1524619| s2cid = 12610250 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Zavadil | first1 = R. | last2 = Miller | first2 = N. | last3 = Ellis | first3 = A. | last4 = Muljadi | first4 = E. | year = 2005 | title = Making connections | journal = IEEE Power and Energy Magazine| volume = 3 | issue = 6 | pages = 26–37 | doi = 10.1109/MPAE.2005.1524618| s2cid = 3037161 }}</ref> | |||
=== Capacity factor === | |||
Since wind speed is not constant, a wind farm's annual ] production is never as much as the sum of the generator nameplate ratings multiplied by the total hours in a year. The ratio of actual productivity in a year to this theoretical maximum is called the ]. Typical capacity factors are 20–50%, with values at the upper end of the range in favourable sites and are due to wind turbine improvements.<ref name="ceereCapInter" /><ref></ref><ref group="nb"> | |||
=== Offshore wind power === | |||
For example, a 1 MW turbine with a capacity factor of 35% will not produce 8,760 MW·h in a year (1 × 24 × 365), but only 1 × 0.35 × 24 × 365 = 3,066 MW·h, averaging to 0.35 MW. | |||
{{multiple image |total_width=500 | |||
|image1=Agucadoura WindFloat Prototype.jpg | caption1= The world's second full-scale ] (and first to be installed without the use of heavy-lift vessels), WindFloat, operating at rated capacity (2 MW) approximately 5 km offshore of ], Portugal | |||
|image2= 20210830 Windfarm power generation capacity - offshore capacity, and total needed.svg| caption2= Offshore windfarms, including floating windfarms, provide a small but growing fraction of total windfarm power generation. Such power generation capacity must grow substantially to help meet the ]'s ] by 2050 pathway to combat ].<ref name=Guardian_20210829>{{cite news |last1=Rosa-Aquino |first1=Paola |title=Floating wind turbines could open up vast ocean tracts for renewable power |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/aug/29/floating-wind-turbines-ocean-renewable-power |work=The Guardian |date=29 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210830162300/https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/aug/29/floating-wind-turbines-ocean-renewable-power |archive-date=30 August 2021 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
</ref> Online data is available for some locations and the capacity factor can be calculated from the yearly output.<ref name="MassMaritime"/><ref name="iesoOntarioWind"/> | |||
}} | |||
{{Main|Offshore wind power|List of offshore wind farms}} | |||
Offshore wind power is wind farms in large bodies of water, usually the sea. These installations can use the more frequent and powerful winds that are available in these locations and have less visual impact on the landscape than land-based projects. However, the construction and maintenance costs are considerably higher.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.renewables-info.com/drawbacks_and_benefits/offshore_wind_power_%E2%80%93_advantages_and_disadvantages.html|title=Offshore wind power – Advantages and disadvantages|last=Hulazan|first=Ned|date=16 February 2011|publisher=Renewable Energy Articles|access-date=9 April 2012|archive-date=13 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181013053638/http://www.renewables-info.com/drawbacks_and_benefits/offshore_wind_power_%E2%80%93_advantages_and_disadvantages.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.windpowermonthly.com/go/europe/news/1021043/Cutting-cost-offshore-wind-energy/|title=Cutting the cost of offshore wind energy|last=Millborrow|first=David|date=6 August 2010|website=Wind Power Monthly|publisher=Haymarket|access-date=10 April 2012|archive-date=2 December 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121202035902/http://www.windpowermonthly.com/go/europe/news/1021043/Cutting-cost-offshore-wind-energy/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Unlike fueled generating plants the capacity factor is affected by several parameters, including the variability of the wind at the site but also the ] size. A small generator would be cheaper and achieve a higher capacity factor but would produce less ] (and thus less profit) in high winds.<ref name="capFactorsBigger"/> Conversely, a large generator would cost more but generate little extra power and, depending on the type, may ] out at low wind speed. Thus an optimum capacity factor would be aimed for, of around 40–50%. | |||
As of November 2021, the ] in the ] is the largest offshore wind farm in the world at 1,218 ].<ref name="hornsea">{{Cite web|date=2020-01-30|title=World's Largest Offshore Wind Farm Fully Up and Running|url=https://www.offshorewind.biz/2020/01/30/worlds-largest-offshore-wind-farm-fully-up-and-running/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200131051635/https://www.offshorewind.biz/2020/01/30/worlds-largest-offshore-wind-farm-fully-up-and-running/|archive-date=31 January 2020|access-date=2020-02-03|website=Offshore Wind|language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
In a 2008 study released by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, the capacity factor achieved by the U.S. wind turbine fleet is shown to be increasing as the technology improves. The capacity factor achieved by new wind turbines in 2010 reached 50%.<ref name="Windpowering" /><ref></ref> | |||
=== Collection and transmission network === | |||
===Penetration=== | |||
Near offshore wind farms may be connected by AC and far offshore by HVDC.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Action |first=BMWK-Federal Ministry for Economics Affairs and Climate |title=Connecting offshore wind energy to the grid |url=https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/Artikel/Energy/connecting-offshore-wind-energy-to-the-grid.html |access-date=2023-01-20 |website=www.bmwk.de |language=en}}</ref> | |||
Wind energy penetration refers to the fraction of energy produced by wind compared with the total available generation capacity. There is no generally accepted maximum level of wind penetration. The limit for a particular ] will depend on the existing generating plants, pricing mechanisms, capacity for storage or demand management and other factors. An interconnected electricity grid will already include ] and ] to allow for equipment failures. This reserve capacity can also serve to compensate for the varying power generation produced by wind plants. Studies have indicated that 20% of the total annual electrical energy consumption may be incorporated with minimal difficulty.<ref name="tacklingUS" /> These studies have been for locations with geographically dispersed wind farms, some degree of ] or ] with storage capacity, demand management, and interconnected to a large grid area enabling the export of electricity when needed. Beyond the 20% level, there are few technical limits, but the economic implications become more significant. Electrical utilities continue to study the effects of large scale penetration of wind generation on system stability and economics.<ref name="NGestimates"/><ref name="minnesota"/><ref name="ESB2004Study"/><ref name="sinclairMerz"/> | |||
Wind power resources are not always located near to high population density. As transmission lines become longer, the losses associated with power transmission increase, as modes of losses at lower lengths are exacerbated and new modes of losses are no longer negligible as the length is increased; making it harder to transport large loads over large distances.<ref>Power System Analysis and Design. Glover, Sarma, Overbye/ 5th Edition</ref> | |||
A wind energy penetration figure can be specified for different durations of time. On an annual basis, as of 2011, few grid systems have penetration levels above five percent: Denmark – 26%, Portugal – 17%, Spain – 15%, Ireland – 14%, and Germany – 9%.<ref name="wtmr_2010_eere">{{cite book|title=2010 Wind Technologies Market Report|publisher=EERE, U.S. Department of Energy|page=7}}</ref> For the U.S. in 2011, the penetration level was estimated at 2.9%.<ref name="wtmr_2010_eere" /> To obtain 100% from wind annually requires substantial long term storage. On a monthly, weekly, daily, or hourly basis—or less—wind can supply as much as or more than 100% of current use, with the rest stored or exported. Seasonal industry can take advantage of high wind and low usage times such as at night when wind output can exceed normal demand. Such industry can include production of silicon, aluminum, steel, or of natural gas, and hydrogen, which allow long term storage, facilitating 100% energy from ].<ref></ref><ref></ref> Homes can also be programmed to accept extra electricity on demand, for example by remotely turning up water heater thermostats (mixer valves prevent anyone from being scalded).<ref group="nb">Mixer valves are commonly used in homes with hot water heating, but need to be added to homes with remote access. A thermostatically controlled mixer valve on a hot water supply line mixes in cold water as needed so that the water supplied to baseboard heaters can be much hotter than that supplied to taps, which remains at a constant temperature. In the reference, water heater thermostats are remotely turned up {{convert|60|F}}.</ref><ref></ref> | |||
When the transmission capacity does not meet the generation capacity, wind farms are forced to produce below their full potential or stop running altogether, in a process known as ]. While this leads to potential renewable generation left untapped, it prevents possible grid overload or risk to reliable service.<ref name=maine> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211124094412/https://www.pressherald.com/2013/08/04/there-is-a-problem-withwind-power-in-maine_2013-08-04/ |date=24 November 2021 }}. Pressherald.com (4 August 2013). Retrieved on 20 July 2016.</ref> | |||
=== Variability and intermittency === | |||
{{main|Intermittent energy source|wind power forecasting}} | |||
], near an ].]] | |||
{| class="wikitable"| style="float: right; border: 2px solid #BBB; margin: .56em 0 0 .8em;" | |||
|+ '''Increase in system operation costs, Euros per MWh, for 10% & 20% wind share'''<ref name="ieawind"/> | |||
|- | |||
! Country | |||
! 10% | |||
! 20% | |||
|- | |||
| Germany | |||
| 2.5 | |||
| 3.2 | |||
|- | |||
| Denmark | |||
| 0.4 | |||
| 0.8 | |||
|- | |||
| Finland | |||
| 0.3 | |||
| 1.5 | |||
|- | |||
| Norway | |||
| 0.1 | |||
| 0.3 | |||
|- | |||
| Sweden | |||
| 0.3 | |||
| 0.7 | |||
|} | |||
One of the biggest current challenges to wind power grid integration in some countries is the necessity of developing new transmission lines to carry power from wind farms, usually in remote lowly populated areas due to availability of wind, to high load locations, usually on the coasts where population density is higher.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-04-07|title=From West to East: The Charged Challenge of Delivering Electricity|url=https://www.chinabusinessreview.com/from-west-to-east-the-charged-challenge-of-delivering-electricity/|access-date=2021-11-24|website=China Business Review|language=en-US}}</ref> Any existing transmission lines in remote locations may not have been designed for the transport of large amounts of energy.<ref name="nytimes.com">Wald, Matthew (26 August 2008) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170701110101/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/27/business/27grid.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 |date=1 July 2017 }}. ''New York Times''</ref> In particular geographic regions, peak wind speeds may not coincide with peak demand for electrical power, whether offshore or onshore. A possible future option may be to interconnect widely dispersed geographic areas with an HVDC ].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Barnard|first=Michael|date=2021-11-11|title=Breaking News: China & USA Joint Declaration On Climate Action Collaboration|url=https://cleantechnica.com/2021/11/11/breaking-news-china-and-usa-joint-declaration-on-climate-action-collaboration/|access-date=2021-11-23|website=CleanTechnica|language=en-US|archive-date=12 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211112143817/https://cleantechnica.com/2021/11/11/breaking-news-china-and-usa-joint-declaration-on-climate-action-collaboration/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Electricity generated from wind power can be highly variable at several different timescales: hourly, daily, or seasonally. However, wind is always in constant supply somewhere, making it a dependable source of energy because it will never expire or become extinct. Annual variation also exists, but is not as significant. Like other electricity sources, wind energy must be scheduled. Wind power forecasting methods are used, but predictability of wind plant output remains low for short-term operation. There is an 80% chance that wind output will change less than 10% in an hour and a 40% chance that it will change 10% or more in 5 hours.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nrel.gov/wind/systemsintegration/system_integration_basics.html|title=Wind Systems Integration Basics}}</ref> Because instantaneous electrical generation and consumption must remain in balance to maintain grid stability, this variability can present substantial challenges to incorporating large amounts of wind power into a grid system. Intermittency and the non-] nature of wind energy production can raise costs for regulation, incremental ], and (at high penetration levels) could require an increase in the already existing ], ], storage solutions or system interconnection with ] cables. At low levels of wind penetration, fluctuations in load and allowance for failure of large generating units require reserve capacity that can also compensate for variability of wind generation. Wind power can be replaced by other power sources during low wind periods. Transmission networks must already cope with outages of generation plant and daily changes in electrical demand. Systems with large wind capacity components may need more spinning reserve (plants operating at less than full load).<ref name="is windpower reliable"/><ref name="clavertonReliable"/> | |||
== Wind power capacity and production == | |||
While the output from a single turbine can vary greatly and rapidly as local wind speeds vary, as more turbines are connected over larger and larger areas the average power output becomes less variable.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.iea.org/Textbase/Papers/2005/variability.pdf |title=Variability of Wind Power and other Renewables: Management Options and Strategies |publisher=IEA |year=2005 |format=PDF }}</ref> Studies by Graham Sinden (2009) suggest that, in practice, the variations in thousands of wind turbines, spread out over several different sites and wind regimes, are smoothed. As the distance between sites increases, the correlation between wind speeds measured at those sites, decreases.<ref name = Diesendorf>{{Cite document| author = Diesendorf, Mark |year= 2007| title =]|page =119| quote =] analysed over 30 years of hourly wind speed data from 66 sites spread out over the United Kingdom. He found that the correlation coefficient of wind power fell from 0.6 at 200 km to 0.25 at 600 km separation (a perfect correlation would have a coefficient equal to 1.0.) There were no hours in the data set where wind speed was below the cut-in wind speed of a modern wind turbine throughout the United Kingdom, and low wind speed events affecting more than 90 per cent of the United Kingdom had an average recurrent rate of only one hour per year.| postscript = <!-- Bot inserted parameter. Either remove it; or change its value to "." for the cite to end in a ".", as necessary. -->{{inconsistent citations}}}}</ref> | |||
{{Main|Wind power by country|Wind power industry}} | |||
=== Growth trends === | |||
The combination of diversifying variable renewables by type and location, forecasting their variation, and integrating them with dispatchable renewables, flexible fueled generators, and demand response can create a power system that has the potential to meet our needs reliably. Integrating ever-higher levels of renewables is being successfully demonstrated in the real world:<ref name=Lovins11>{{cite book|authorlink=Amory Lovins|year=2011|title=]|publisher=Chelsea Green Publishing|page=199}}</ref> | |||
{{multiple image | align=center |total_width=675 | |||
<blockquote> | |||
| image1= 2010- Power capacity by technology - Dec 2022 International Energy Agency.svg |caption1= Renewable energy sources, especially ] and wind power, are providing an increasing share of power capacity.<ref name="IEA_20221205">{{cite web |title=Share of cumulative power capacity by technology, 2010–2027 |url=https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/share-of-cumulative-power-capacity-by-technology-2010-2027 |website=IEA.org |publisher=International Energy Agency (IEA) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204170647/https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/share-of-cumulative-power-capacity-by-technology-2010-2027 |archive-date=4 February 2023 |date=5 December 2022 |url-status=live}} Source states "Fossil fuel capacity from IEA (2022), ''World Energy Outlook 2022''. IEA. Licence: CC BY 4.0."</ref> | |||
In 2009, eight American and three European authorities, writing in the leading electrical engineers' professional journal, didn't find "a credible and firm technical limit to the amount of wind energy that can be accommodated by electricity grids". In fact, not one of more than 200 international studies, nor official studies for the eastern and western U.S. regions, nor the ], has found major costs or technical barriers to reliably integrating up to 30% variable renewable supplies into the grid, and in some studies much more. – ''Reinventing Fire''<ref name=Lovins11/> | |||
| image2= Wind energy generation by region, OWID.svg |caption2=Wind energy generation by region<ref>{{cite web |title=Wind energy generation by region |url=https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/wind-energy-consumption-by-region |website=Our World in Data |access-date=15 August 2023 |archive-date=10 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200310222609/https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/wind-energy-consumption-by-region |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
| image3= Wind generation by country.svg |caption3=Wind generation by country | |||
}} | |||
{{clear}} | |||
{{Image frame | |||
| caption=Log graph of global wind power cumulative capacity (Data:GWEC)<ref name="GWEC_Market">{{cite web |url=http://www.gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Global-Cumulative-Installed-Wind-Capacity-2001-2016.jpg |title=GWEC, Global Wind Report Annual Market Update |publisher=Gwec.net |access-date=20 May 2017 |archive-date=12 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190812135710/https://www.gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Global-Cumulative-Installed-Wind-Capacity-2001-2016.jpg |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
| content = {{Graph:Chart | |||
|type=line | |||
|width=290 | |||
|height=200<!--height = 80 X <no. of log10 cycles in y axis>--> | |||
|colors=#50A5FF,#FFC000,#87CEEB,#A4A1A2 | |||
|showValues= | |||
|xType = date | |||
|xAxisFormat=%Y | |||
|xAxisAngle=-40 | |||
|yAxisTitle=Cumulative Capacity (GW) | |||
|x= 1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019 | |||
|y1Title= | |||
<!--Search string CASES_Y--> | |||
|y1=6.1,7.6,10.2,13.6,17.4,23.9,31.1,39.4,47.6,59.1,74.0,93.9,120.7,159.1,198.0,238.1,282.9,318.7,368.8,432.7,487.3,539.1,591,650 | |||
|yScaleType=log<!--This is the line that makes this plot have a log axis--> | |||
|yAxisMin = 5<!--Needed to avoid trying to show the values y2, y3 of 0, impossible on log scale because log(0)=-infinity--> | |||
|yGrid= |xGrid= | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
<!-- START OF GW SCALE COUNTRIES CHART --> | |||
] tends to be complementary to wind.<ref name="windsun" /><ref name="smallWindSystems" /> On daily to weekly timescales, ]s tend to bring clear skies and low surface winds, whereas ]s tend to be windier and cloudier. On seasonal timescales, solar energy peaks in summer, whereas in many areas wind energy is lower in summer and higher in winter.<ref>] and ] are exceptions.</ref><ref name="cleveland_water_crib" /> Thus the intermittencies of wind and solar power tend to cancel each other somewhat. In 2007 the Institute for Solar Energy Supply Technology of the ] pilot-tested a ] linking solar, wind, ] and ] to provide load-following power around the clock and throughout the year, entirely from renewable sources.<ref name="combined_power_plant"/> | |||
{| style="float:right" | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
{{Image frame | |||
|width = 250 | |||
|align=right | |||
|pos=bottom | |||
|content= | |||
<div style="margin:0 5px -40px -70px; font-size:0.85em;"> | |||
<div style="font-size: 120%; font-weight: bold; padding: 10px 0 12px 90px;">Number of countries with wind capacities in the gigawatt-scale by year</div> | |||
{{ #invoke:Chart | bar-chart | |||
| width = 280 | |||
| height = 280 | |||
| stack = 1 | |||
| group 1 = 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 2 : 2 : 2 : 2 | |||
| group 2 = 1 : 1 : 3 : 3 : 4 : 5 : 5 : 5 : 5 : 6 : 5 : 7 : 8 : 8 : 9 : 8 : 8 : 10 : 11 | |||
| group 3 = 6 : 10 : 10 : 10 : 12 : 12 : 15 : 17 : 19 : 18 : 18 : 18 : 20 : 21 : 22 : 25 : 25 : 26 : 27 | |||
| colors = #990000 : #FFaa77 : #FFccaa | |||
| group names = installed more than 100 GW : installed between 10 and 100 GW : installed between 1 and 10 GW | |||
| units suffix = _countries | |||
| hide group legends = 1 | |||
| x legends = : 2005 : : : : : 2010: : : : : 2015 : : : : : 2020 : : | |||
}}</div> | |||
|caption =Growing number of wind gigawatt-markets | |||
{{Collapsible list | |||
| title = {{legend2|#FFccaa|border=1px solid #ccccaa|Above 1-GW mark}} | |||
|{{aligned table | cols=5 | |||
| style=width: 50%; text-align: left; font-size: 100%; margin-left: 22px; | |||
| 2022 | |||
| {{flagicon|CRO}} | |||
| {{flagicon|KAZ}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2021 | |||
| {{flagicon|RUS}} | |||
| {{flagicon|TAI}} | |||
| {{flagicon|VIE}} | |||
| | |||
| 2019 | |||
| {{flagicon|ARG}} | |||
| {{flagicon|THA}} | |||
| {{flagicon|UKR}} | |||
| | |||
| 2018 | |||
| {{flagicon|PAK}} | |||
| {{flagicon|EGY}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2017 | |||
| {{flagicon|NOR}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2016 | |||
| {{flagicon|CHI}} | |||
| {{flagicon|URU}} | |||
| {{flagicon|KOR}} | |||
| | |||
| 2015 | |||
| {{flagicon|SA}} | |||
| {{flagicon|FIN}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2012 | |||
| {{flagicon|MEX}} | |||
| {{flagicon|ROM}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2011 | |||
| {{flagicon|BRA}} | |||
| {{flagicon|BEL}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2010 | |||
| {{flagicon|AUT}} | |||
| {{flagicon|POL}} | |||
| {{flagicon|TUR}} | |||
| | |||
| 2009 | |||
| {{flagicon|GRE}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2008 | |||
| {{flagicon|IRE}} | |||
| {{flagicon|AUS}} | |||
| {{flagicon|SWE}} | |||
| | |||
| 2006 | |||
| {{flagicon|CAN}} | |||
| {{flagicon|FRA}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2005 | |||
| {{flagicon|UK}} | |||
| {{flagicon|CHN}} | |||
| {{flagicon|JP}} | |||
| {{flagicon|POR}} | |||
| 2004 | |||
| {{flagicon|NED}} | |||
| {{flagicon|ITA}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 1999 | |||
| {{flagicon|SPA}} | |||
| {{flagicon|IND}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 1997 | |||
| {{flagicon|DEN}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 1995 | |||
| {{flagicon|GER}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 1986 | |||
| {{flagicon|USA}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
}}<!-- end of table--> | |||
}}<!-- end of list --> | |||
{{Collapsible list | |||
| title = {{legend2|#FFaa77|border=1px solid #ccaa77|Above 10-GW mark}} | |||
|{{aligned table | cols=5 | |||
| style=width: 50%; text-align: left; font-size: 100%; margin-left: 22px; | |||
| 2022 | |||
| {{flagicon|AUS}}<!-- https://en.wikipedia.org/Wind_power_by_country --> | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2021 | |||
| {{flagicon|SWE}}<!-- https://en.wikipedia.org/Wind_power_by_country --> | |||
| {{flagicon|TUR}}<!-- https://windeurope.org/newsroom/news/turkey-reaches-10-gw-wind-energy-milestone/ --> | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2018 | |||
| {{flagicon|ITA}}<!-- https://www.qualenergia.it/articoli/quanti-impianti-eolici-ci-sono-in-italia/ --> | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2016 | |||
| {{flagicon|BRA}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2015 | |||
| {{flagicon|CAN}} | |||
| {{flagicon|FRA}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2013 | |||
| {{flagicon|UK}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2009 | |||
| {{flagicon|IND}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2008 | |||
| {{flagicon|CHN}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2006 | |||
| {{flagicon|USA}} | |||
| {{flagicon|SPA}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2002 | |||
| {{flagicon|GER}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
}}<!-- end of table--> | |||
}}<!-- end of list --> | |||
{{Collapsible list | |||
| title = {{legend2|#990000|border=1px solid #200000|Above 100-GW mark}} | |||
|{{aligned table | cols=5 | |||
| style=width: 50%; text-align: left; font-size: 100%; margin-left: 22px; | |||
| 2019 | |||
| {{flagicon|USA}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| 2014 | |||
| {{flagicon|CHN}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
}}<!-- end of table--> | |||
}}<!-- end of list --> | |||
}} | |||
|} | |||
{{clear}} | |||
In 2020, wind supplied almost 1600 ] of electricity, which was over 5% of worldwide electrical generation and about 2% of energy consumption.<ref name="bpcom">{{cite web|title=bp Statistical Review of World Energy 2020|url=https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2020-full-report.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919060352/https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2020-full-report.pdf|archive-date=19 September 2020|access-date=23 October 2020|publisher=BP p.l.c.|pages=55, 59}}</ref><ref name=":0" /> With over 100 ] added during 2020, mostly ], global installed wind power capacity reached more than 730 GW.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":0" /> But to help meet the ]'s goals to ], analysts say it should expand much faster – by over 1% of electricity generation per year.<ref name=":2" /> Expansion of wind power is being hindered by ].<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|date=2021-10-29|title=UNDP: More spent on fossil fuel subsidies than fighting poverty|url=https://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/november-2021/undp-more-spent-fossil-fuel-subsidies-fighting-poverty|access-date=2021-11-24|website=Africa Renewal|language=en}}</ref><ref name=":4">{{Cite web|title=Fossil fuel subsidies and renewable energies in MENA: An oxymoron?|last=Mohseni-Cheraghlou|first=Amin|date=2021-02-23|url=https://www.mei.edu/publications/fossil-fuel-subsidies-and-renewable-energies-mena-oxymoron|access-date=2021-11-24|work=Middle East Institute|language=en}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Cite news|date=2021-11-15|title=COP26: How much is spent supporting fossil fuels and green energy?|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/59233799|access-date=2021-11-24}}</ref> | |||
A 2006 ] forum presented costs for managing intermittency as a function of wind-energy's share of total capacity for several countries, as shown in the table on the right. Three reports on the wind variability in the UK issued in 2009, generally agree that variability of wind needs to be taken into account, but it does not make the grid unmanageable. The additional costs, which are modest, can be quantified.<ref name="abbess"/> | |||
The actual amount of electric power that wind can generate is calculated by multiplying the ] by the ], which varies according to equipment and location. Estimates of the capacity factors for wind installations are in the range of 35% to 44%.<ref>Rick Tidball and others, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140821101932/http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/48595.pdf |date=21 August 2014 }}, US National Renewable Energy Laboratory, November 2010, p.63.</ref> | |||
A report on Denmark's wind power noted that their wind power network provided less than 1% of average demand on 54 days during the year 2002.<ref name="Denmark"/> Wind power advocates argue that these periods of low wind can be dealt with by simply restarting existing power stations that have been held in readiness, or interlinking with HVDC.<ref name="Czisch-Giebel"/> Electrical grids with slow-responding thermal power plants and without ties to networks with hydroelectric generation may have to limit the use of wind power.<ref name="Denmark" /> According to a 2007 Stanford University study published in the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, interconnecting ten or more wind farms can allow an average of 33% of the total energy produced to be used as reliable, ], as long as minimum criteria are met for wind speed and turbine height.<ref name="connecting_wind_farms" /><ref name="Archer2007" /> | |||
===Capacity factor=== | |||
Conversely, on particularly windy days, even with penetration levels of 16%, wind power generation can surpass all other electricity sources in a country. In Spain, on 16 April 2012 wind power production reached the highest percentage of electricity production till then, with wind farms covering 60.46% of the total demand.<ref name="eolica"/> | |||
Since wind speed is not constant, a wind farm's annual energy production is never as much as the sum of the generator nameplate ratings multiplied by the total hours in a year. The ratio of actual productivity in a year to this theoretical maximum is called the capacity factor. Online data is available for some locations, and the capacity factor can be calculated from the yearly output.<ref name="MassMaritime"> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070211113537/http://view2.fatspaniel.net/FST/Portal/LighthouseElectrical/maritime/HostedAdminView.html |date=11 February 2007}} This 660 kW wind turbine has a capacity factor of about 19%.</ref><ref name="iesoOntarioWind"> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140810202450/http://www.ieso.ca/imoweb/marketdata/windpower.asp |date=10 August 2014}} These wind farms have capacity factors of about 28–35%.</ref> | |||
=== |
=== Penetration === | ||
] | |||
In general, hydroelectricity complements wind power very well. When the wind is blowing strongly, nearby hydroelectric plants can temporarily hold back their water, and when the wind drops they can rapidly increase production again giving a very even power supply. | |||
Wind energy penetration is the fraction of energy produced by wind compared with the total generation. Wind power's share of worldwide electricity usage in 2021 was almost 7%,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/renewable-energy.html.html#wind-energy |publisher=] |access-date=15 January 2020 |title=Renewable energy |archive-date=6 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201106215146/https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/renewable-energy.html.html#wind-energy |url-status=live }}</ref> up from 3.5% in 2015.<ref>{{cite web|title=BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2016 – Electricity|url=http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2016/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2016-electricity.pdf|publisher=BP|access-date=12 September 2016|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160910023428/http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2016/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2016-electricity.pdf|archive-date=10 September 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2016 – Renewable energy |url=http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2016/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2016-renewable-energy.pdf |publisher=BP |access-date=12 September 2016 |archive-date=18 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160818051801/http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2016/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2016-renewable-energy.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
There is no generally accepted maximum level of wind penetration. The limit for a particular ] will depend on the existing generating plants, pricing mechanisms, capacity for ], demand management, and other factors. An interconnected electric power grid will already include ] and ] to allow for equipment failures. This reserve capacity can also serve to compensate for the varying power generation produced by wind stations. Studies have indicated that 20% of the total annual electrical energy consumption may be incorporated with minimal difficulty.<ref name=tacklingUS> | |||
] or other forms of ] can store energy developed by high-wind periods and release it when needed.<ref name="Mitchell 2006" /> The type of storage needed depends on the wind penetration level - low penetration requires daily storage, and high penetration requires both short and long term storage - as long as a month or more. Stored energy increases the economic value of wind energy since it can be shifted to displace higher cost generation during peak demand periods. The potential revenue from this ] can offset the cost and losses of storage; the cost of storage may add 25% to the cost of any wind energy stored but it is not envisaged that this would apply to a large proportion of wind energy generated. For example, in the UK, the 1.7 GW ] evens out electrical demand peaks, and allows base-load suppliers to run their plants more efficiently. Although pumped storage power systems are only about 75% efficient, and have high installation costs, their low running costs and ability to reduce the required electrical base-load can save both fuel and total electrical generation costs.<ref name="dinorwig" /><ref name="futureStorage" /> | |||
{{cite web | |||
| url=http://ases.org/images/stories/file/ASES/climate_change.pdf | |||
| title=Tackling Climate Change in the U.S | |||
| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081126220129/http://www.ases.org/images/stories/file/ASES/climate_change.pdf | |||
| archive-date=26 November 2008 | |||
| publisher= American Solar Energy Society | |||
| date=January 2007 | access-date=5 September 2007}} | |||
</ref> These studies have been for locations with geographically dispersed wind farms, some degree of ] or ] with storage capacity, demand management, and interconnected to a large grid area enabling the export of electric power when needed. Electrical utilities continue to study the effects of large-scale penetration of wind generation on system stability.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-12-08|title=New research shows Wind turbines, configured right, could provide grid stability|url=https://energypost.eu/new-research-shows-wind-turbines-configured-right-could-provide-grid-stability/|access-date=2022-01-25|website=Energy Post|language=en-GB}}</ref> | |||
A wind energy penetration figure can be specified for different duration of time but is often quoted annually. To generate almost all electricity from wind annually requires substantial interconnection to other systems, for example some ] is sent to the rest of the ].<ref>{{Cite news |date=2022-04-01 |title=Low winds blamed for fall in Scotland's renewable energy production |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-60948639 |access-date=2023-01-20}}</ref> On a monthly, weekly, daily, or hourly basis—or less—wind might supply as much as or more than 100% of current use, with the rest stored, exported or curtailed. The seasonal industry might then take advantage of high wind and low usage times such as at night when wind output can exceed normal demand. Such industry might include the production of silicon, aluminum,<ref>Andresen, Tino. " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170407022716/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-11-27/molten-aluminum-lakes-offer-power-storage-for-german-wind-farms |date=7 April 2017 }}" '']'', 27 October 2014.</ref> steel, or natural gas, and hydrogen, and using future long-term storage to facilitate 100% energy from ].<ref>{{cite web |author=Luoma, Jon R. |url=http://e360.yale.edu/feature/the_challenge_for_green_energy_how_to_store_excess_electricity/2170/ |title=The Challenge for Green Energy: How to Store Excess Electricity |publisher=E360.yale.edu |date=13 July 2001 |access-date=8 November 2012 |archive-date=6 April 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130406032321/http://e360.yale.edu/feature/the_challenge_for_green_energy_how_to_store_excess_electricity/2170/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://revmodo.com/2012/08/23/power-to-gas-technology-turns-excess-wind-energy-into-natural-gas/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121005211707/http://revmodo.com/2012/08/23/power-to-gas-technology-turns-excess-wind-energy-into-natural-gas/ |archive-date=5 October 2012 |author=Buczynski, Beth |title=Power To Gas Technology Turns Excess Wind Energy Into Natural Gas |publisher=Revmodo.com |date=23 August 2012}}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=too old|date=January 2023}} Homes and businesses can also be programmed to ],<ref>{{Cite web |title=What is demand-side response |url=https://en.energinet.dk/electricity/green-electricity/demand-side-response/what-is-demand-side-response/ |access-date=2023-01-20 |website=en.energinet.dk |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-07-18 |title=Managing wind volatility in Ireland with demand response |url=https://gridbeyond.com/managing-wind-volatility-in-ireland-with-demand-response/ |access-date=2023-01-20 |website=GridBeyond |language=en-US}}</ref> for example by remotely turning up water heater thermostats.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Demand Response – Analysis |url=https://www.iea.org/reports/demand-response |access-date=2023-01-20 |website=IEA |language=en-GB}}</ref> | |||
In particular geographic regions, peak wind speeds may not coincide with peak demand for electrical power. In the US states of California and ], for example, hot days in summer may have low wind speed and high electrical demand due to the use of ]. Some utilities subsidize the purchase of ]s by their customers, to reduce electricity demand during the summer months by making air conditioning up to 70% more efficient;<ref name="geothermal_incentive" /> widespread adoption of this technology would better match electricity demand to wind availability in areas with hot summers and low summer winds. Another option is to interconnect widely dispersed geographic areas with an HVDC "]". In the U.S. it is estimated that to upgrade the transmission system to take in planned or potential renewables would cost at least $60 billion.<ref name="slogin" /> | |||
=== Variability === | |||
Germany has an installed capacity of wind and solar that exceeds daily demand, and has been exporting peak power to neighboring countries. A more practical solution is the installation of thirty days storage capacity able to supply 80% of demand, which will become necessary when most of Europe's energy is obtained from wind power and solar power. Just as the EU requires member countries to maintain 90 days ] of oil it can be expected that countries will provide electricity storage, instead of expecting to use their neighbors for net metering.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201202/20120208ATT37544/20120208ATT37544EN.pdf|title=European Renewable Energy Network|format=PDF|page=71}}</ref> | |||
{{Main|Variable renewable energy}} | |||
=== Capacity credit and fuel savings === | |||
{{Further|Grid balancing}} | |||
The capacity credit of wind is estimated by determining the capacity of conventional plants displaced by wind power, whilst maintaining the same degree of system security,.<ref name="The facts">{{cite web|url=http://www.wind-energy-the-facts.org/en/part-2-grid-integration/chapter-6-wind-power-contribution-to-system-adequacy/capacity-credit-of-wind-power/|title=Capacity Credit of Wind Power: Capacity credit is the measure for firm wind power|last=Anon|work=Wind Energy the Facts|publisher=EWEA|accessdate=10 April 2012}}</ref> However, the precise value is irrelevant since the main value of wind (in the UK, worth 5 times the capacity credit value<ref name="capacityCredit" />) is its fuel and {{CO2}} savings.<ref></ref> | |||
], near an ].]] | |||
== Economics == | |||
]: an onshore wind farm in ] near ]]] | |||
=== Cost trends === | |||
] | |||
] projects that the levelized cost of wind power in the U.S. will decline about 25% from 2012 to 2030.<ref>E. Lantz, M. Hand, and R. Wiser (May 13–17, 2012) National Renewable Energy Laboratory conference paper no. 6A20-54526, page 4</ref>]] | |||
Wind power is variable, and during low wind periods, it may need to be replaced by other power sources. Transmission networks presently cope with outages of other generation plants and daily changes in electrical demand, but the variability of ]s such as wind power is more frequent than those of conventional power generation plants which, when scheduled to be operating, may be able to deliver their nameplate capacity around 95% of the time. | |||
] in the U.K. (2008). Even longer ] are now manufactured, and then assembled on-site to reduce difficulties in transportion.]] | |||
Electric power generated from wind power can be highly variable at several different timescales: hourly, daily, or seasonally. Annual variation also exists but is not as significant.{{Citation needed|date=November 2021}} Because instantaneous electrical generation and consumption must remain in balance to maintain grid stability, this variability can present substantial challenges to incorporating large amounts of wind power into a grid system. Intermittency and the non-] nature of wind energy production can raise costs for regulation, incremental ], and (at high penetration levels) could require an increase in the already existing ], ], storage solutions, or system interconnection with ] cables. | |||
Wind power has low ongoing costs, but a moderate capital cost. The ] of wind energy once a plant is constructed is usually less than 1 cent per kW·h.<ref name="Patel"/> As wind turbine technology improves, costs are coming down. There are now longer and lighter wind turbine blades, improvements in turbine performance and increased power generation efficiency. Also, wind project capital and maintenance costs have continued to decline.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/08/14/banner-year-us-wind-industry |title=A Banner Year for the U.S. Wind Industry |author=David Danielson |date=14 August 2012 |work=Whitehouse Blog }}</ref> | |||
Fluctuations in load and allowance for the failure of large fossil-fuel generating units require operating reserve capacity, which can be increased to compensate for the variability of wind generation. | |||
The estimated ] per unit incorporates the cost of construction of the turbine and transmission facilities, borrowed funds, return to investors (including cost of risk), estimated annual production, and other components, averaged over the projected useful life of the equipment, which may be in excess of twenty years. Energy cost estimates are highly dependent on these assumptions so published cost figures can differ substantially. In 2004, wind energy cost a fifth of what it did in the 1980s, and some expected that downward trend to continue as larger multi-megawatt ] were mass-produced.<ref name="helming"/> {{As of|2012}} capital costs for wind turbines are substantially lower than 2008–2010 but are still above 2002 levels.<ref> | |||
{{cite web | |||
| title = LBNL/NREL Analysis Predicts Record Low LCOE for Wind Energy in 2012–2013 | |||
| work = US Department of Energy Wind Program Newsletter | |||
| url = http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/wind/newsletter/detail.cfm/articleId=45 | |||
| accessdate =10 March 2012}}</ref> A 2011 report from the American Wind Energy Association stated, "Wind's costs have dropped over the past two years, in the range of 5 to 6 cents per kilowatt-hour recently.... about 2 cents cheaper than coal-fired electricity, and more projects were financed through debt arrangements than tax equity structures last year.... winning more mainstream acceptance from Wall Street's banks.... Equipment makers can also deliver products in the same year that they are ordered instead of waiting up to three years as was the case in previous cycles.... 5,600 MW of new installed capacity is under construction in the United States, more than double the number at this point in 2010. Thirty-five percent of all new power generation built in the United States since 2005 has come from wind, more than new gas and coal plants combined, as power providers are increasingly enticed to wind as a convenient hedge against unpredictable commodity price moves."<ref name="salerno"/> | |||
] are often used to balance hourly and shorter timescale variation,<ref>{{Cite web|last=Katz|first=Cheryl|title=The batteries that could make fossil fuels obsolete|url=https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20201217-renewable-power-the-worlds-largest-battery|access-date=2021-11-23|website=www.bbc.com|language=en|archive-date=11 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210111075439/https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20201217-renewable-power-the-worlds-largest-battery|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-01-14|title=Report: An additional 20GWh of battery storage could significantly reduce wind power curtailment in UK|url=https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/storage/report-an-additional-20gwh-of-battery-storage-could-significantly-reduce-wind-power-curtailment-in-uk/|access-date=2021-11-23|website=Renewable Energy World|language=en-US|archive-date=26 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210226223141/https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/storage/report-an-additional-20gwh-of-battery-storage-could-significantly-reduce-wind-power-curtailment-in-uk/|url-status=live}}</ref> but ] may gain ground from the mid-2020s.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Answers to the UK's wind energy storage issues are emerging – NS Energy|date=9 September 2021 |url=https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/features/wind-energy-storage-in-the-uk-is-posing-problems-but-long-term-solutions-are-emerging/|access-date=2021-11-23|language=en-US|archive-date=10 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210910082016/https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/features/wind-energy-storage-in-the-uk-is-posing-problems-but-long-term-solutions-are-emerging/|url-status=live}}</ref> Wind power advocates argue that periods of low wind can be dealt with by simply restarting existing power stations that have been held in readiness, or interlinking with HVDC.<ref name="Czisch-Giebel"> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140701230913/http://www.risoe.dk/rispubl/reports/ris-r-1608_186-195.pdf |date=1 July 2014}} Gregor Czisch, University of Kassel, Germany and Gregor Giebel, Risø National Laboratory, Technical University of Denmark</ref> | |||
A British Wind Energy Association report gives an average generation cost of onshore wind power of around 3.2 pence (between US 5 and 6 cents) per kW·h (2005).<ref name="BWEA"/> Cost per unit of energy produced was estimated in 2006 to be comparable to the cost of new generating capacity in the US for coal and natural gas: wind cost was estimated at $55.80 per MW·h, coal at $53.10/MW·h and natural gas at $52.50.<ref name="eiadoe"/> Similar comparative results with natural gas were obtained in a governmental study in the UK in 2011.<ref name="ccc"/> A 2009 study on wind power in Spain by Gabriel Calzada Alvarez of ] concluded that each installed MW of wind power led to the loss of 4.27 jobs, by raising energy costs and driving away electricity-intensive businesses.<ref name="juande"/> The U.S. Department of Energy found the study to be seriously flawed, and the conclusion unsupported.<ref name="nrelemployment"/> The presence of wind energy, even when subsidised, can reduce costs for consumers (€5 billion/yr in Germany) by reducing the marginal price, by minimising the use of expensive ]s.<ref name="meritorder"/> | |||
The combination of diversifying variable renewables by type and location, forecasting their variation, and integrating them with dispatchable renewables, flexible fueled generators, and demand response can create a power system that has the potential to meet power supply needs reliably. Integrating ever-higher levels of renewables is being successfully demonstrated in the real world.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Annual variable renewable energy share and corresponding system integration phase in selected countries/regions, 2018 – Charts – Data & Statistics |url=https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/annual-variable-renewable-energy-share-and-corresponding-system-integration-phase-in-selected-countries-regions-2018 |access-date=2023-01-20 |website=IEA |language=en-GB}}</ref> | |||
===Incentives and community benefits=== | |||
] in Texas.]] | |||
], in California, United States. Developed during a period of tax incentives in the 1980s, this wind farm has more turbines than any other in the US.<ref name="altamontPass"/>]] | |||
] | |||
The U.S. wind industry generates tens of thousands of jobs and billions of dollars of economic activity.<ref name=usdept>{{cite web |url=http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/49222.pdf |title=Strengthening America's Energy Security with Offshore Wind |date = February 2011|publisher=U.S. Department of Energy }}</ref> Wind projects provide local taxes, or payments in lieu of taxes and strengthen the economy of rural communities by providing income to farmers with wind turbines on their land.<ref name=nine/><ref>{{cite web| title =Direct Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in Energy in Fiscal Year 2010| work =Report| publisher =Energy Information Administration | date =1 August 2011| url =http://www.eia.gov/analysis/requests/subsidy/| accessdate =29 April 2012}}</ref> Wind energy in many jurisdictions receives financial or other support to encourage its development. Wind energy benefits from ] in many jurisdictions, either to increase its attractiveness, or to compensate for subsidies received by other forms of production which have significant negative externalities. | |||
] tends to be complementary to wind.<ref name=windsun>Wood, Shelby (21 January 2008) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120118135025/http://blog.oregonlive.com/pdxgreen/2008/01/wind_sun_join_forces_at_washin.html |date=18 January 2012 }}. ''The Oregonian''.</ref><ref name=smallWindSystems>{{cite web |url=http://www.seco.cpa.state.tx.us/re/wind/smallwind.php |title=Small Wind Systems |publisher=Seco.cpa.state.tx.us |access-date=29 August 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121023190904/http://www.seco.cpa.state.tx.us/re/wind/smallwind.php |archive-date=23 October 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref> On daily to weekly timescales, ]s tend to bring clear skies and low surface winds, whereas ]s tend to be windier and cloudier. On seasonal timescales, solar energy peaks in summer, whereas in many areas wind energy is lower in summer and higher in winter.{{efn-ua|1=] is an exception}}<ref name="cleveland_water_crib">{{cite web |url = http://www.development.cuyahogacounty.us/pdf_development/en-US/ExeSum_WindResrc_CleveWtrCribMntr_Reprt.pdf |title = Lake Erie Wind Resource Report, Cleveland Water Crib Monitoring Site, Two-Year Report Executive Summary |publisher = Green Energy Ohio |date = 10 January 2008 |access-date = 27 November 2008 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081217063550/http://www.development.cuyahogacounty.us/pdf_development/en-US/ExeSum_WindResrc_CleveWtrCribMntr_Reprt.pdf |archive-date = 17 December 2008 |url-status=dead |df = dmy-all}} This study measured up to four times as much average wind power during winter as in summer for the test site.</ref> Thus the seasonal variation of wind and solar power tend to cancel each other somewhat.<ref name="balancing-europe">Kaspar, F., Borsche, M., Pfeifroth, U., Trentmann, J., Drücke, J., and Becker, P.: A climatological assessment of balancing effects and shortfall risks of photovoltaics and wind energy in Germany and Europe, Adv. Sci. Res., 16, 119–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-16-119-2019 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211124094345/https://asr.copernicus.org/articles/16/119/2019/ |date=24 November 2021 }}, 2019</ref> ] are becoming more popular.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-11-23|title=Turkish Cengiz evaluates expansion of its giant hybrid power plant|url=https://balkangreenenergynews.com/turkish-cengiz-evaluates-expansion-of-its-giant-hybrid-power-plant/|access-date=2021-11-24|website=Balkan Green Energy News|language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
===Predictability=== | |||
In the US, wind power receives a production tax credit (PTC) of 1.5¢/kWh in 1993 dollars for each kW·h produced, for the first ten years; at 2.2 cents per kW·h in 2012, the credit was renewed on January 2, 2012, to include construction begun in 2013. A 30% tax credit can be applied instead of receiving the PTC.<ref></ref><ref></ref> Another tax benefit is ]. Many American states also provide incentives, such as exemption from property tax, mandated purchases, and additional markets for "]".<ref></ref> The ] contains extensions of credits for wind, including microturbines. Countries such as ] and Germany also provide incentives for wind turbine construction, such as tax credits or minimum purchase prices for wind generation, with assured grid access (sometimes referred to as ]s). These feed-in tariffs are typically set well above average electricity prices.<ref></ref><ref></ref> | |||
{{Main|Wind power forecasting}} | |||
For any particular generator, there is an 80% chance that wind output will change less than 10% in an hour and a 40% chance that it will change 10% or more in 5 hours.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nrel.gov/wind/systemsintegration/system_integration_basics.html |title=Wind Systems Integration Basics |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120607000124/http://www.nrel.gov/wind/systemsintegration/system_integration_basics.html |archive-date=7 June 2012}}</ref> | |||
In summer 2021, ] fell due to the lowest winds in seventy years,<ref>{{Cite web|last=Stevens|first=Pippa|date=2021-09-29|title=UK energy titan SSE says low wind, driest conditions in 70 years hit renewable generation|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/29/sse-says-low-wind-dry-conditions-hit-renewable-energy-generation.html|access-date=2021-11-23|website=CNBC|language=en|archive-date=11 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211111110700/https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/29/sse-says-low-wind-dry-conditions-hit-renewable-energy-generation.html|url-status=live}}</ref> In the future, smoothing peaks by producing ] may help when wind has a larger share of generation.<ref>{{Cite web|title='UK's largest electrolyser' could fuel hundreds of bus journeys with wind power each day|url=https://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/uk-s-largest-electrolyser-could-fuel-hundreds-of-bus-journeys-with-wind-power-each-day|access-date=2021-11-23|website=www.imeche.org|archive-date=22 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211122212128/https://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/uk-s-largest-electrolyser-could-fuel-hundreds-of-bus-journeys-with-wind-power-each-day|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Secondary market forces also provide incentives for businesses to use wind-generated power, even if there is a ]. For example, ] pay utility companies a premium that goes to subsidize and build new wind power infrastructure. Companies use wind-generated power, and in return they can claim that they are undertaking strong "green" efforts. In the US the organization Green-e monitors business compliance with these renewable energy credits.<ref name="green-e"/> | |||
While the output from a single turbine can vary greatly and rapidly as local wind speeds vary, as more turbines are connected over larger and larger areas the average power output becomes less variable and more predictable.<ref name="huang" /><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uwig.org/IEA_Report_on_variability.pdf |title=Variability of Wind Power and other Renewables: Management Options and Strategies |publisher=IEA |year=2005 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051230204247/http://www.uwig.org/IEA_Report_on_variability.pdf |archive-date=30 December 2005}}</ref> ]ing permits the electric-power network to be readied for the predictable variations in production that occur.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Santhosh|first1=Madasthu|last2=Venkaiah|first2=Chintham|last3=Kumar|first3=D. M. Vinod|date=2020|title=Current advances and approaches in wind speed and wind power forecasting for improved renewable energy integration: A review|journal=Engineering Reports|language=en|volume=2|issue=6|pages=e12178|doi=10.1002/eng2.12178|issn=2577-8196|doi-access=free}}</ref> | |||
== Environmental effects == | |||
{{Main|Environmental impact of wind power}} | |||
[[File:Wb deichh drei kuhs.jpg|thumb|right|Livestock ignore wind turbines,<ref name="livestock_ignore"> | |||
{{Cite web | |||
| url= http://www.uintacountyherald.com/V2_news_articles.php?heading=0&page=72&story_id=1299 | |||
| title =Capturing the wind | |||
| first =Erin | |||
| last =Buller | |||
| date =11 July 2008 | |||
| publisher =Uinta County Herald | |||
| accessdate =4 December 2008 | |||
}}"The animals don't care at all. We find cows and antelope napping in the shade of the turbines." - Mike Cadieux, site manager, Wyoming Wind Farm</ref> and continue to graze as they did before wind turbines were installed.]] | |||
Compared to the environmental impact of traditional energy sources, the environmental impact of wind power is relatively minor. Wind power consumes no fuel, and emits no ], unlike fossil fuel power sources. The energy consumed to manufacture and transport the materials used to build a wind power plant is equal to the new energy produced by the plant within a few months. While a wind farm may cover a large area of land, many land uses such as agriculture are compatible, with only small areas of turbine foundations and infrastructure made unavailable for use.<ref name=mar></ref><ref name="British Wind Energy Association">{{cite web| url= http://www.bwea.com/ref/faq.html | title=Wind energy Frequently Asked Questions| publisher=British Wind Energy Association| accessdate=21 April 2006}}</ref> | |||
It is thought that the most reliable low-carbon electricity systems will include a large share of wind power.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Tong |first1=Dan |last2=Farnham |first2=David J. |last3=Duan |first3=Lei |last4=Zhang |first4=Qiang |last5=Lewis |first5=Nathan S. |last6=Caldeira |first6=Ken |last7=Davis |first7=Steven J. |date=2021-10-22 |title=Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide |journal=Nature Communications |language=en |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=6146 |doi=10.1038/s41467-021-26355-z |pmid=34686663 |pmc=8536784 |bibcode=2021NatCo..12.6146T |issn=2041-1723}}</ref> | |||
There are reports of bird and bat mortality at wind turbines as there are around other artificial structures. The scale of the ecological impact may<ref name="Eilperin"> | |||
{{cite news | |||
| url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/15/AR2009041503622_2.html?hpid=topnews&sid=ST2009041602328 | |||
| title = Renewable Energy's Environmental Paradox | |||
| last = Eilperin | first= Juliet |coauthors= Steven Mufson | |||
| date = 16 April 2009 | |||
| work = ] |publisher= | |||
| accessdate=17 April 2009 }} | |||
</ref> or may not<ref name="rspb"/> be significant, depending on specific circumstances. Prevention and mitigation of wildlife fatalities, and protection of ],<ref name="blanketpeat"/> affect the siting and operation of wind turbines. | |||
===Energy storage=== | |||
There are anecdotal reports of negative effects from noise on people who live very close to wind turbines. Peer-reviewed research has generally not supported these statements.<ref name='CanWEA09'>W. David Colby, Robert Dobie, Geoff Leventhall, David M. Lipscomb, Robert J. McCunney, Michael T. Seilo, Bo Søndergaard. , Canadian Wind Energy Association, December 2009.</ref> | |||
{{main|Grid energy storage}} | |||
{{see also|List of energy storage projects}} | |||
] | |||
Typically, conventional ] complements wind power very well. When the wind is blowing strongly, nearby hydroelectric stations can temporarily hold back their water. When the wind drops they can, provided they have the generation capacity, rapidly increase production to compensate. This gives a very even overall power supply and virtually no loss of energy and uses no more water. | |||
Alternatively, where a suitable head of water is not available, ] or other forms of ] such as ] and ] can store energy developed by high-wind periods and release it when needed. The type of storage needed depends on the wind penetration level – low penetration requires daily storage, and high penetration requires both short- and long-term storage – as long as a month or more.{{Citation needed|date=November 2021}} Stored energy increases the economic value of wind energy since it can be shifted to displace higher-cost generation during peak demand periods. The potential revenue from this ] can offset the cost and losses of storage. Although pumped-storage power systems are only about 75% efficient and have high installation costs, their low running costs and ability to reduce the required electrical base-load can save both fuel and total electrical generation costs.<ref name=dinorwig>{{cite web|url=http://www.thegreenage.co.uk/greencommercial/hydroelectric-power/dinorwig-hydroelectric-plant |title=Dinorwig Hydroelectric Plant, Wales |publisher=Thegreenage.co.uk |access-date=11 January 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130111224833/http://www.thegreenage.co.uk/greencommercial/hydroelectric-power/dinorwig-hydroelectric-plant |archive-date=11 January 2013}}</ref><ref name=futureStorage>The Future of Electrical Energy Storage: The economics and potential of new technologies 2 January 2009 ID RET2107622</ref> | |||
== Politics == | |||
=== Central government === | |||
Fossil fuels are ], and wind power and other forms of renewable energy are also often subsidized. For example a 2009 study by the Environmental Law Institute<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elistore.org/Data/products/d19_07.pdf|title=Estimating U.S. Government Subsidies to Energy Sources: 2002-2008|publisher=Environmental Law Institute|date=September 2009|format=PDF|accessdate=31 October 2012}}</ref> assessed the size and structure of U.S. energy subsidies over the 2002–2008 period. The study estimated that subsidies to fossil-fuel based sources amounted to approximately $72 billion over this period and subsidies to renewable fuel sources totalled $29 billion. In the United States, the federal government has paid US$74 billion for energy subsidies to support ] for ] ($50 billion) and ] ($24 billion) from 1973 to 2003. During this same time frame, ] technologies and ] received a total of US$26 billion. It has been suggested that a subsidy shift would help to level the playing field and support growing energy sectors, namely ], wind power, and ].<ref name=per/> History shows that no energy sector was developed without subsidies.<ref name=per>Pernick, Ron and Wilder, Clint (2007). '']: The Next Big Growth and Investment Opportunity'', p. 280.</ref> | |||
=== Energy payback === | |||
According to the ] (2011) energy subsidies artificially lower the price of energy paid by consumers, raise the price received by producers or lower the cost of production. "Fossil fuels subsidies costs generally outweigh the benefits. Subsidies to renewables and low-carbon energy technologies can bring long-term economic and environmental benefits".<ref name=IEA-FS2011> How will global energy markets evolve to 2035? IEA November 2011 6 pages</ref> In November 2011, an IEA report entitled ''Deploying Renewables 2011'' said "subsidies in green energy technologies that were not yet competitive are justified in order to give an incentive to investing into technologies with clear environmental and energy security benefits". The IEA's report disagreed with claims that renewable energy technologies are only viable through costly subsidies and not able to produce energy reliably to meet demand. | |||
The energy needed to build a wind farm divided into the total output over its life, ], of wind power varies, but averages about 20–25.<ref>. The Encyclopedia of Earth (7 June 2007)</ref><ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1504/IJSM.2014.062496 |title=Comparative life cycle assessment of 2.0 MW wind turbines |journal=International Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing |volume=3 |issue=2 |page=170 |year=2014 |last1=Haapala |first1=Karl R. |last2=Prempreeda |first2=Preedanood}}</ref> Thus, the energy payback time is typically around a year. | |||
In the US, the wind power industry has recently increased its lobbying efforts considerably, spending about $5 million in 2009 after years of relative obscurity in Washington.<ref name="LobbyingAfter"/> By comparison, the US nuclear industry alone spent over $650 million on its lobbying efforts and campaign contributions during a single ten-year period ending in 2008.<ref name="spendingOnNuclear"/><ref> | |||
==Economics== | |||
Ward, Chip. , ], 5 March 2010. | |||
] | |||
Onshore wind is an inexpensive source of electric power, cheaper than coal plants and new gas plants.<ref name=":6" /> According to ], wind turbines reached ] (the point at which the cost of wind power matches traditional sources) in some areas of Europe in the mid-2000s, and in the US around the same time. Falling prices continue to drive the Levelized cost down and it has been suggested that it has reached general grid parity in Europe in 2010, and will reach the same point in the US around 2016 due to an expected reduction in capital costs of about 12%.<ref name="businessgreen"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120117080111/http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/2124487/onshore-wind-reach-grid-parity-2016 |date=17 January 2012 }}, BusinessGreen, 14 November 2011</ref>{{Update inline|date=September 2022}} In 2021, the CEO of ] warned that increased demand for low-cost wind turbines combined with high input costs and high costs of steel result in increased pressure on the manufacturers and decreasing profit margins.<ref>{{Cite news|title=World's largest offshore wind turbine maker warns of price pressures|url=https://www.ft.com/content/49d77f86-2a85-414e-b879-b4c00a51887f|url-status=live|access-date=2021-06-16|newspaper=Financial Times|date=16 March 2021 |archive-date=24 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210624200237/https://www.ft.com/content/49d77f86-2a85-414e-b879-b4c00a51887f}}</ref> | |||
Northern Eurasia, Canada, some parts of the United States, and ] in Argentina are the best areas for onshore wind: whereas in other parts of the world solar power, or a combination of wind and solar, tend to be cheaper.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Bogdanov |first1=Dmitrii |last2=Ram |first2=Manish |last3=Aghahosseini |first3=Arman |last4=Gulagi |first4=Ashish |last5=Oyewo |first5=Ayobami Solomon |last6=Child |first6=Michael |last7=Caldera |first7=Upeksha |last8=Sadovskaia |first8=Kristina |last9=Farfan |first9=Javier |last10=De Souza Noel Simas Barbosa |first10=Larissa |last11=Fasihi |first11=Mahdi |date=2021-07-15 |title=Low-cost renewable electricity as the key driver of the global energy transition towards sustainability |journal=Energy |language=en |volume=227 |pages=120467 |doi=10.1016/j.energy.2021.120467 |s2cid=233706454 |issn=0360-5442|doi-access=free |bibcode=2021Ene...22720467B }}</ref>{{Rp|page=8}} | |||
</ref><ref> | |||
===Electric power cost and trends=== | |||
Pasternak, Judy. , ] co-published with the ], 24 January 2010.</ref> | |||
] in the U.K. (2008). Even longer ] are now manufactured, and then assembled on-site to reduce difficulties in transportation.]] | |||
{{See also|Cost of electricity by source}} | |||
Wind power is ] but has no fuel costs.<ref name="IRENA">Dolf Gielen. "" '']'', June 2012. Quote: "wind is capital intensive, but has no fuel costs"</ref> The price of wind power is therefore much more stable than the volatile prices of fossil fuel sources.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140423231722/http://www.nationalgridus.com/non_html/c3-3_NG_wind_policy.pdf |date=23 April 2014}}. National Grid US (September 2006).</ref> However, the estimated ] per unit of electric power must incorporate the cost of construction of the turbine and transmission facilities, borrowed funds, return to investors (including the cost of risk), estimated annual production, and other components, averaged over the projected useful life of the equipment, which may be more than 20 years. Energy cost estimates are highly dependent on these assumptions so published cost figures can differ substantially. | |||
The presence of wind energy, even when subsidized, can reduce costs for consumers (€5 billion/yr in Germany) by reducing the marginal price, by minimizing the use of expensive ]s.<ref>{{cite book |last=Rao |first=K.R |date=October 17, 2019 |title=Wind Energy for Power Generation: Meeting the Challenge of Practical Implementation |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bY23DwAAQBAJ&q=he+presence+of+wind+energy%2C+even+when+subsidized%2C+can+reduce+costs+for+consumers+%28%E2%82%AC5+billion%2Fyr+in+Germany%29+by+reducing+the+marginal+price%2C+by+minimizing+the+use+of+expensive+peaking+power+plants.&pg=PA586 |url-status=live |location= |publisher=Springer Nature, 2019 |isbn=978-3319751344 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211124094409/https://books.google.com/books?id=bY23DwAAQBAJ&q=he+presence+of+wind+energy%2C+even+when+subsidized%2C+can+reduce+costs+for+consumers+%28%E2%82%AC5+billion%2Fyr+in+Germany%29+by+reducing+the+marginal+price%2C+by+minimizing+the+use+of+expensive+peaking+power+plants.&pg=PA586 |archive-date=24 November 2021 |access-date=4 May 2021 }}</ref> | |||
Following the ], Germany's federal government is working on a new plan for increasing ] and ], with a particular focus on offshore wind farms. Under the plan large wind turbines will be erected far away from the coastlines, where the wind blows more consistently than it does on land, and where the enormous turbines won't bother the inhabitants. The plan aims to decrease Germany's dependence on energy derived from coal and nuclear power plants.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,752791,00.html |title=Will Nuke Phase-Out Make Offshore Farms Attractive? |author=Stefan Schultz |date=23 March 2011 |work=Der Spiegel }}</ref> | |||
The cost has decreased as wind turbine technology has improved. There are now longer and lighter wind turbine blades, improvements in turbine performance, and increased power generation efficiency. Also, wind project capital expenditure costs and maintenance costs have continued to decline.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2012/08/14/banner-year-us-wind-industry |title=A Banner Year for the U.S. Wind Industry |author=Danielson, David |via=] |work=] |date=14 August 2012 |access-date=1 March 2021 |archive-date=10 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310021408/https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2012/08/14/banner-year-us-wind-industry |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Commenting on the ], economist Professor ] is critical of how the costs of wind power are cited by lobbyists. Helm also says that the problem of intermittent supply will probably lead to another ] or dash for coal in Europe, possibly with a negative impact on ].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Helm |first=Dieter|date=October 2009|title=EU climate-change policy—a critique|journal=The Economics and Politics of Climate Change|publisher=OUP|url=http://www.dieterhelm.co.uk/sites/default/files/SS_EU_CC_Critique_0.pdf}}</ref> A ] ] report (2008) on renewable energy in the UK reported a "concern over the prospective role of wind generated and other intermittent sources of electricity in the UK, in the absence of a break-through in electricity storage technology or the integration of the UK grid with that of continental Europe".<ref name="FourthReport"/> | |||
In 2021, a Lazard study of unsubsidized electricity said that wind power ] continues to fall but more slowly than before. The study estimated new wind-generated electricity cost from $26 to $50/MWh, compared to new gas power from $45 to $74/MWh. The median cost of fully deprecated existing coal power was $42/MWh, nuclear $29/MWh and gas $24/MWh. The study estimated offshore wind at around $83/MWh. ] was 4% per year from 2016 to 2021, compared to 10% per year from 2009 to 2021.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web|title=Levelized Cost Of Energy, Levelized Cost Of Storage, and Levelized Cost Of Hydrogen|url=http://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-levelized-cost-of-storage-and-levelized-cost-of-hydrogen/|access-date=2021-11-24|website=Lazard.com|language=en}}</ref> | |||
===Public opinion=== | |||
Surveys of public attitudes across Europe and in many other countries show strong public support for wind power.<ref name=com/><ref name=vipublic>{{cite web|url=http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/ewea_documents/documents/publications/WD/WD22vi_public.pdf |title=A Summary of Opinion Surveys on Wind Power |format=PDF |accessdate=17 January 2012}} | |||
</ref><ref name=eon>{{cite web|url=http://www.eon-uk.com/generation/publicattitudes.aspx |title=Public attitudes to wind farms |publisher=Eon-uk.com |date=28 February 2008 |accessdate=17 January 2012}}</ref> About 80 percent of EU citizens support wind power.<ref name=thefacts>{{cite web |url=http://www.wind-energy-the-facts.org/en/environment/chapter-6-social-acceptance-of-wind-energy-and-wind-farms/ |title=The Social Acceptance of Wind Energy |work=European Commission }}</ref> | |||
In Germany, where wind power has gained very high social acceptance, hundreds of thousands of people have invested in citizens' wind farms across the country and thousands of small and medium sized enterprises are running successful businesses in a new sector that in 2008 employed 90,000 people and generated 8 percent of Germany's electricity.<ref name=emp>{{cite web|url=http://dsc.discovery.com/technology/my-take/community-wind-farm.html |title=Community Power Empowers |publisher=Dsc.discovery.com |date=26 May 2009 |accessdate=17 January 2012}}</ref><ref name=soc>{{dead link|date=January 2012}}</ref> | |||
===The value of wind power=== | |||
In Spain, with some exceptions, there has been little opposition to the installation of inland wind parks. However, the projects to build offshore parks have been more controversial.<ref>{{cite journal | |||
While the levelised costs of wind power may have reached that of traditional combustion based power technologies, the market value of the generated power is also lower due to the ] effect, which implies that electricity market prices are lower in hours with substantial generation of variable renewable energy due to the low marginal costs of this technology.<ref>{{cite journal | first1=Lion |last1= Hirth| | |||
| last = Cohn | |||
title=The market value of variable renewables: The effect of solar wind power variability on their relative price|journal=Energy Economics|volume=38 |year=2013|pages= 218–236|issn= 0140-9883| doi= 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.004 |bibcode= 2013EneEc..38..218H|url= https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-22900|hdl=1814/27135|hdl-access=free}} </ref> The effect has been identified in several European markets.<ref>{{ cite journal |first1 =Marijke| last1=Welisch |first2=André |last2=Ortner| first3=Gustav |last3=Resch | | |||
| first = Laura | |||
title =Assessment of RES technology market values and the merit-order effect – an econometric multi-country analysis|journal = Energy & Environment| | |||
| coauthors = Vitzhum, Carlta; Ewing, Jack | |||
volume = 27| number = 1| pages = 105–121| year =2016| doi = 10.1177/0958305X16638574 | |||
| title = Wind power has a head of steam | |||
| bibcode=2016EnEnv..27..105W }}</ref> For wind power plants exposed to electricity market pricing in markets with high penetration of variable renewable energy sources, profitability can be challenged. | |||
| journal = European Business. | |||
| date = 11 July 2005 | |||
| url = | |||
| id = | |||
}}</ref> In particular, the proposal of building the biggest offshore wind power production facility in the world in southwestern Spain in the coast of Cádiz, on the spot of the 1805 ].<ref name="Engineer2003">{{cite journal | |||
| title = Grave developments for battle site | |||
| journal = The Engineer. | |||
| pages = 6 | |||
| date = 13 June 2003 | |||
| url = | |||
| id = | |||
}}</ref> has been met with strong opposition who fear for tourism and fisheries in the area,<ref><Las eólicas preparan su inmersión ></ref> and because the area is a war grave.<ref name="Engineer2003" /> | |||
===Incentives and community benefits=== | |||
In a survey conducted by Angus Reid Strategies in October 2007, 89 per cent of respondents said that using renewable energy sources like wind or solar power was positive for Canada, because these sources were better for the environment. Only 4 per cent considered using renewable sources as negative since they can be unreliable and expensive.<ref></ref> According to a Saint Consulting survey in April 2007, wind power was the alternative energy source most likely to gain public support for future development in Canada, with only 16% opposed to this type of energy. By contrast, 3 out of 4 Canadians opposed nuclear power developments.<ref></ref> | |||
Turbine prices have fallen significantly in recent years due to tougher competitive conditions such as the increased use of energy auctions, and the elimination of subsidies in many markets.<ref>{{cite web|author=Reed, Stanley|date=9 November 2017|title=As Wind Power Sector Grows, Turbine Makers Feel the Squeeze|url=https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/11/09/business/energy-environment/wind-turbine-vestas.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171111152417/https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/11/09/business/energy-environment/wind-turbine-vestas.html|archive-date=11 November 2017|access-date=11 November 2017|publisher=TNT}}</ref> As of 2021, ] are still often given to offshore wind. But they are generally no longer necessary for onshore wind in countries with even a very low carbon price such as China, provided there are no competing ].<ref>{{Cite web|title=China's 2022 Wind Power Growth to Stay Strong Despite Subsidy End|url=https://www.fitchratings.com/research/corporate-finance/china-2022-wind-power-growth-to-stay-strong-despite-subsidy-end-23-11-2021 |access-date=2021-11-24|website=www.fitchratings.com}}</ref> | |||
A 2003 survey of residents living around Scotland's 10 existing wind farms found high levels of community acceptance and strong support for wind power, with much support from those who lived closest to the wind farms. The results of this survey support those of an earlier Scottish Executive survey 'Public attitudes to the Environment in Scotland 2002', which found that the Scottish public would prefer the majority of their electricity to come from renewables, and which rated wind power as the cleanest source of renewable energy.<ref></ref> A survey conducted in 2005 showed that 74% of people in Scotland agree that wind farms are necessary to meet current and future energy needs. When people were asked the same question in a Scottish Renewables study conducted in 2010, 78% agreed. The increase is significant as there were twice as many wind farms in 2010 as there were in 2005. The 2010 survey also showed that 52% disagreed with the statement that wind farms are "ugly and a blot on the landscape". 59% agreed that wind farms were necessary and that how they looked was unimportant.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-11569466 |title='Rise in Scots wind farm support' |date=19 October 2010 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sustainablescotland.com/business-communities/scots-support-wind-farms |title=Scots support wind farms |date=22 October 2010 |work=Sustainable Scotland }}</ref> | |||
Secondary market forces provide incentives for businesses to use wind-generated power, even if there is a ]. For example, ] pay utility companies a premium that goes to subsidize and build new wind power infrastructure. Companies use wind-generated power, and in return, they can claim that they are undertaking strong "green" efforts.<ref name="green-e"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130611235247/https://speakerdeck.com/resourcesolutions/the-2010-green-e-verification-report |date=11 June 2013 }} Retrieved on 20 May 2009</ref> Wind projects provide local taxes, or payments in place of taxes and strengthen the economy of rural communities by providing income to farmers with wind turbines on their land.<ref name="nine">American Wind Energy Association (2009) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130113205504/http://www.slideshare.net/Calion/awea-annual-wind-report-2009|date=13 January 2013}} p. 11</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=1 August 2011|title=Direct Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in Energy in Fiscal Year 2010|url=http://www.eia.gov/analysis/requests/subsidy/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191001012707/https://www.eia.gov/analysis/requests/subsidy/|archive-date=1 October 2019|access-date=29 April 2012|website=Report|publisher=Energy Information Administration}}</ref> | |||
=== Community === | |||
:''See also ] | |||
], England, have been opposed for a number of reasons, including aesthetics, by some sectors of the population.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.visitcumbria.com/wc/windfarms.htm|title=Wind Farms in Cumbria|accessdate=3 October 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3661728.stm|title=Wind Turbulence over turbines in Cumbria|author=James Arnold|publisher=BBC News|date=20 September 2004|accessdate=3 October 2008}}</ref>]] | |||
Many wind power companies work with local communities to reduce environmental and other concerns associated with particular wind farms.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=48671 |title=Group Dedicates Opening of 200 MW Big Horn Wind Farm: Farm incorporates conservation efforts that protect wildlife habitat |publisher=Renewableenergyaccess.com |accessdate=17 January 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Jeanette Fisher |url=http://environmentpsychology.com/wind_power_midamerican's_intrepid_wind_farm1.htm |title=Wind Power: MidAmerican's Intrepid Wind Farm |publisher=Environmentpsychology.com |accessdate=17 January 2012}}</ref><ref> | |||
{{cite web|url=http://www.agl.com.au/environment/sustainability/Pages/StakeholderEngagement.aspx |title=Stakeholder Engagement |publisher=Agl.com.au |date=19 March 2008 |accessdate=17 January 2012}}</ref><ref>{{dead link|date=January 2012}}</ref> In other cases there is ]. Appropriate government consultation, planning and approval procedures also help to minimize environmental risks.<ref name=com> | |||
{{cite web|url=http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/ewea_documents/documents/press_releases/factsheet_environment2.pdf |title=Wind Energy and the Environment |format=PDF |accessdate=17 January 2012}}</ref><ref> | |||
{{cite web|url=http://www.environment.gov.au/settlements/renewable/publications/pubs/wind-discussionpaper.pdf |title=National Code for Wind Farms |publisher=Environment.gov.au |accessdate=17 January 2012}}</ref><ref> | |||
{{cite web|url=http://www.publish.csiro.au/?act=view_file&file_id=EC140p6a.pdf |title=New standard and big investment for wind energy |publisher=Publish.csiro.au |date=17 December 2007 |accessdate=17 January 2012}} | |||
</ref> Some may still object to wind farms<ref name="wind-watch.org"/> but, according to ], their concerns should be weighed against the need to address the threats posed by ] and the opinions of the broader community.<ref>The Australia Institute (2006). Discussion Paper Number 91, October, ISSN 1322-5421, p. 28.</ref> | |||
In America, wind projects are reported to boost local tax bases, helping to pay for schools, roads and hospitals. Wind projects also revitalize the economy of rural communities by providing steady income to farmers and other landowners.<ref name=nine/> | |||
In the UK, both the ] and the ] have expressed concerns about the effects on the rural landscape caused by inappropriately sited wind turbines and wind farms.<ref>, ''BBC News'', 14 March 2012. Retrieved 20 March 2012.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/environment/cpre_calls_for_action_over_proliferation_of_wind_turbines_1_1363291|title=CPRE calls for action over 'proliferation' of wind turbines|last=Hill|first=Chris|date=30 April 2012|work=EDP 24|publisher=Archant community Media Ltd|accessdate=30 April 2012}}</ref> | |||
Some wind farms have become tourist attractions. The ] Visitor Centre has an exhibition room, a learning hub, a café with a viewing deck and also a shop. It is run by the ].<ref> | |||
{{cite web |url=http://www.whiteleewindfarm.co.uk/visitor_centre |title=Whitelee Windfarm |work=Scottish Power Renewables }}</ref> | |||
In Denmark, a loss-of-value scheme gives people the right to claim compensation for loss of value of their property if it is caused by proximity to a wind turbine. The loss must be at least 1% of the property's value.<ref name="Danish-loss-of-value-scheme"/> | |||
Despite this general support for the concept of wind power in the public at large, ] often exists and has delayed or aborted a number of projects. | |||
While aesthetic issues are subjective and some find wind farms pleasant and optimistic, or symbols of ] and local prosperity, protest groups are often formed to attempt to block new wind power sites for various reasons.<ref name="wind-watch.org"></ref><ref name="guardian.co.uk" /><ref name=guardianQA /> | |||
The wind energy sector can also produce jobs during the construction and operating phase.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://windexchange.energy.gov/projects/economic-impacts | title=WINDExchange: Wind Energy's Economic Impacts to Communities }}</ref> Jobs include the manufacturing of wind turbines and the construction process, which includes transporting, installing, and then maintaining the turbines. An estimated 1.25 million people were employed in wind power in 2020.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Wind energy industry – employment 2020 |url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/268400/jobs-in-the-wind-energy-industry-worldwide-since-2005/ |access-date=2022-09-19 |website=Statista |language=en}}</ref> | |||
This type of opposition is often described as ]ism,<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/519708 | work=The Star | location=Toronto | title=Windmills vs. NIMBYism | date=20 October 2008}}</ref> but research carried out in 2009 found that there is little evidence to support the belief that residents only object to renewable power facilities such as wind turbines as a result of a "Not in my Back Yard" attitude.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/1807322/wind-industry-avoid-branding-opponents-nimbys|title=Wind industry should avoid branding opponents "Nimbys"|last=Donoghue|first=Andrew|date=30 July 2009|work=Business Green|publisher=Business Green|accessdate=13 April 2012}}</ref> | |||
== |
==Small-scale wind power== | ||
{{main|Small wind turbine}} | |||
{{Further|Microgeneration}} | {{Further|Microgeneration}} | ||
] ] ] on the roof of ] in ]. Measuring 3 m in diameter and 5 m high, it has a nameplate rating of 6.5 kW.]] | |||
]]] | |||
Small-scale wind power is the name given to wind generation systems with the capacity to produce up to 50 kW of electrical power.<ref name="smallScaleCarbonTrust">{{cite web |url=http://www.carbontrust.com/resources/reports/technology/small-scale-wind-energy |title=Small-scale wind energy |publisher=Carbontrust.co.uk |access-date=29 August 2010 |archive-date=14 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130514062058/http://www.carbontrust.com/resources/reports/technology/small-scale-wind-energy |url-status=live }}</ref> Isolated communities, that may otherwise rely on ] generators, may use wind turbines as an alternative. Individuals may purchase these systems to reduce or eliminate their dependence on grid electric power for economic reasons, or to reduce their ]. Wind turbines have been used for household electric power generation in conjunction with ] storage over many decades in remote areas.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://telosnet.com/wind/20th.html | title = Part 2 – 20th Century Developments | last = Dodge | first = Darrell M. | website = Illustrated history of wind power development | publisher = TelosNet Web Development | access-date = 27 April 2012 | archive-date = 28 March 2012 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120328083701/http://telosnet.com/wind/20th.html | url-status = live }}</ref> | |||
Examples of small-scale wind power projects in an urban setting can be found in ], where, since 2009, several building projects have capped their roofs with ]. Although the energy they generate is small compared to the buildings' overall consumption, they help to reinforce the building's 'green' credentials in ways that "showing people your high-tech boiler" cannot, with some of the projects also receiving the direct support of the ].<ref>Chanban, Matt A.V.; Delaquérière, Alain. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170709122333/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/27/nyregion/turbines-pop-up-on-new-york-roofs-along-with-questions-of-efficiency.html?ref=earth&gwh=7741044F383A0294E75C6B34AA88E68D |date=9 July 2017 }}, '']'' website, 26 May 2014, and in print on 27 May 2014, p. A19 of the New York edition.</ref> | |||
Small-scale wind power is the name given to wind generation systems with the capacity to produce up to 50 kW of electrical power.<ref name="smallScaleCarbonTrust"/> Isolated communities, that may otherwise rely on ] generators, may use wind turbines as an alternative. Individuals may purchase these systems to reduce or eliminate their dependence on grid electricity for economic reasons, or to reduce their ]. Wind turbines have been used for household electricity generation in conjunction with ] storage over many decades in remote areas.<ref name="Dodge"/> | |||
Grid-connected domestic wind turbines may use |
Grid-connected domestic wind turbines may use grid energy storage, thus replacing purchased electric power with locally produced power when available. The surplus power produced by domestic microgenerators can, in some jurisdictions, be fed into the network and sold to the utility company, producing a retail credit for the microgenerators' owners to offset their energy costs.<ref name="home-made"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140818194835/http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/Migration/article100906.ece |date=18 August 2014 }} ] 22 June 2008 Retrieved on 10 January 2013</ref> | ||
Off-grid system users can either adapt to intermittent power or use batteries, ] or diesel systems to supplement the wind turbine. Equipment such as parking meters, traffic warning signs, street lighting, or wireless Internet gateways may be powered by a small wind turbine, possibly combined with a photovoltaic system, that charges a small battery replacing the need for a connection to the power grid.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/13/exploiting-the-downsides-of-wind-and-solar/|title=Wind, Solar-Powered Street Lights Only Need a Charge Once Every Four Days|last=Kart|first=Jeff|date=13 May 2009 |
Off-grid system users can either adapt to intermittent power or use batteries, ], or diesel systems to supplement the wind turbine.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ramirez Camargo|first1=Luis|last2=Nitsch|first2=Felix|last3=Gruber|first3=Katharina|last4=Valdes|first4=Javier|last5=Wuth|first5=Jane|last6=Dorner|first6=Wolfgang|date=January 2019|title=Potential Analysis of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Self-Sufficient Residential Use in Germany and the Czech Republic|journal=Energies|language=en|volume=12|issue=21|pages=4185|doi=10.3390/en12214185|doi-access=free}}</ref> Equipment such as parking meters, traffic warning signs, street lighting, or wireless Internet gateways may be powered by a small wind turbine, possibly combined with a photovoltaic system, that charges a small battery replacing the need for a connection to the power grid.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/13/exploiting-the-downsides-of-wind-and-solar/ | title=Wind, Solar-Powered Street Lights Only Need a Charge Once Every Four Days | last=Kart | first=Jeff | date=13 May 2009 | website=Clean Technica | access-date=30 April 2012 | archive-date=17 November 2011 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111117075022/http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/13/exploiting-the-downsides-of-wind-and-solar/ | url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
]s, such as kites, can be used in places at risk of hurricanes, as they can be taken down in advance.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Jones |first=Nicola |title=The kites seeking the world's surest winds |url=https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220309-the-kites-flying-to-harness-the-worlds-strongest-winds |access-date=2022-04-02 |website=www.bbc.com |language=en}}</ref> | |||
In locations near or around a group of high-rise buildings, wind shear generates areas of intense turbulence, especially at street-level.<ref name="UrbanWindDefinition"/> The risks associated with mechanical or catastrophic failure have thus plagued urban wind development in densely populated areas, rendering the costs of insuring urban wind systems prohibitive.<ref name="An_Urban_Experiment_in_Renewable_Energy"/> | |||
Moreover, quantifying the amount of wind in urban areas has been difficult, as little is known about the actual wind resources of towns and cities.<ref name="WindyCities"/> | |||
== Impact on environment and landscape == | |||
A ] study into the potential of small-scale wind energy in the UK, published in 2010, found that small wind turbines could provide up to 1.5 terawatt hours (TW·h) per year of electricity (0.4% of total UK electricity consumption), saving 0.6 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (Mt CO<sub>2</sub>) emission savings. This is based on the assumption that 10% of households would install turbines at costs competitive with grid electricity, around 12 pence (US 19 cents) a kW·h.<ref name="CarbonSmallTrust"/> A report prepared for the UK's government-sponsored ] in 2006, found that home power generators of various kinds could provide 30 to 40 percent of the country's electricity needs by 2050.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Hamer|first=Mick|date=21 January 2006|title=The rooftop power revolution |journal=New Scientist|publisher=Reed Business Information Ltd.|issue=2535|url=http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18925351.400-the-rooftop-power-revolution.html?full=true#bx253514B1|accessdate=11 April 2012}}</ref> | |||
{{Main|Environmental impact of wind power}} | |||
] | |||
] grazing near a wind turbine.<ref name="livestock_ignore">{{cite web |url=http://www.uintacountyherald.com/V2_news_articles.php?heading=0&page=72&story_id=1299 |title=Capturing the wind |first=Erin |last=Buller |date=11 July 2008 |publisher=Uinta County Herald |access-date=4 December 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080731090354/http://www.uintacountyherald.com/V2_news_articles.php?heading=0&story_id=1299&page=72 |archive-date=31 July 2008 }}"The animals don't care at all. We find cows and antelope napping in the shade of the turbines." – Mike Cadieux, site manager, Wyoming Wind Farm</ref>]] | |||
The ] from wind power is minor when compared to that of ].<ref name=":7" /> Wind turbines have some of the lowest ]: far less ] than for the average unit of electricity, so wind power helps limit climate change.<ref name=":9">{{Cite web |title=How Wind Energy Can Help Us Breathe Easier |url=https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/articles/how-wind-energy-can-help-us-breathe-easier |access-date=2022-09-27 |website=Energy.gov |language=en}}</ref> Use of engineered wood may allow carbon negative wind power.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/23379076.flatpack-wood-turbines-give-wind-power-green-boost/ | title=Swedish flatpack wood turbines could give wind power a green boost | date=12 March 2023 }}</ref> Wind power consumes no fuel, and emits no local ], unlike fossil fuel power sources. | |||
] from ]s is increasing as a consequence of the increased awareness of ]. The electronic interfaces required to connect renewable generation units with the ] system can include additional functions, such as the active filtering to enhance the power quality.<ref name="ActiveFiltering"/> | |||
{{-}} | |||
Onshore wind farms can have a significant visual impact.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Visual impacts and acceptability of wind farms to councillors and senior council staff in Britain | year=2022 | doi=10.1080/00207233.2021.2017174 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00207233.2021.2017174?journalCode=genv20| last1=Lothian | first1=Andrew | journal=International Journal of Environmental Studies | volume=80 | pages=113–136 | s2cid=245874077 }}</ref> Due to a very low ] and spacing requirements, wind farms typically need to be spread over more land than other power stations.<ref name="grantham" /><ref>{{Cite web|title=What are the pros and cons of onshore wind energy?|url=https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/explainers/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-onshore-wind-energy/|access-date=2020-12-12|website=Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment|language=en-GB|archive-date=22 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190622123816/http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/faqs/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-onshore-wind-energy/|url-status=live}}</ref> Their network of turbines, access roads, transmission lines, and substations can result in "energy sprawl";<ref name="energyfootprint"/> although land between the turbines and roads can still be used for agriculture.<ref name="mar">{{cite web |url=http://solarwind.net.au/Documents/WindPowersStrength.pdf |title=Why Australia needs wind power |access-date=7 January 2012 |archive-date=3 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303223035/http://solarwind.net.au/Documents/WindPowersStrength.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bwea.com/ref/faq.html |title=Wind energy Frequently Asked Questions |publisher=British Wind Energy Association |access-date=21 April 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060419225935/http://www.bwea.com/ref/faq.html |archive-date=19 April 2006}}</ref> Some wind farms are opposed for potentially spoiling protected scenic areas, archaeological landscapes and heritage sites.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Dodd |first1=Eimear |title=Permission to build five turbine wind farm at Kilranelagh refused |url=https://www.independent.ie/regionals/wicklowpeople/news/permission-to-build-five-turbine-wind-farm-at-kilranelagh-refused-40231644.html |access-date=18 January 2022 |work=] |date=27 March 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Kula |first1=Adam |title=Department defends 500ft windfarm in protected Area of Outstanding Beauty |url=https://www.newsletter.co.uk/country-and-farming/department-defends-500ft-windfarm-in-protected-area-of-outstanding-beauty-3194391 |access-date=18 January 2022 |work=] |date=9 April 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Building wind farms 'could destroy Welsh landscape' |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-50264159 |access-date=18 January 2022 |work=BBC News |date=4 November 2019}}</ref> A report by the ] concluded that wind farms harmed ] in areas known for natural landscapes and panoramic views.<ref>Gordon, David. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200921180510/https://www.mountaineering.scot/assets/contentfiles/media-upload/Wind_farms_and_tourism_in_Scotland_-_a_review,_Nov_2017_20171106.pdf |date=21 September 2020 }}. ]. November 2017. p.3</ref> | |||
== See also == | |||
{{Portal|Renewable energy|Energy|Sustainable development}} | |||
{{div col|3}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
Habitat loss and fragmentation are the greatest potential impacts on wildlife of onshore wind farms,<ref name="energyfootprint" /> but the worldwide ecological impact is minimal.<ref name=":7">{{Cite journal|last1=Dunnett|first1=Sebastian|last2=Holland|first2=Robert A.|last3=Taylor|first3=Gail|last4=Eigenbrod|first4=Felix|date=2022-02-08|title=Predicted wind and solar energy expansion has minimal overlap with multiple conservation priorities across global regions|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|language=en|volume=119|issue=6|doi=10.1073/pnas.2104764119|doi-access=free |issn=0027-8424|pmid=35101973|pmc=8832964 |bibcode=2022PNAS..11904764D }}</ref> Thousands of birds and bats, including rare species, have been killed by wind turbine blades,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hosansky|first=David|date=April 1, 2011|title=Wind Power: Is wind energy good for the environment?|journal=CQ Researcher}}</ref> though wind turbines are responsible for far fewer bird deaths than fossil-fueled power stations when climate change effects are included.<ref name=":10">{{cite journal|last1=Sovacool|first1=B. K.|year=2013|title=The avian benefits of wind energy: A 2009 update|journal=Renewable Energy|volume=49|pages=19–24|doi=10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.074|bibcode=2013REne...49...19S }}</ref> Not including these effects, modern wind turbines kill about 0.273 birds per GWh in comparison with 0.200 by coal power plants.<ref name=":10" /> The effects of wind turbines on birds can be mitigated with proper wildlife monitoring.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Parisé|first1=J.|last2=Walker|first2=T. R.|year=2017|title=Industrial wind turbine post-construction bird and bat monitoring: A policy framework for Canada|journal=Journal of Environmental Management|volume=201|pages=252–259|doi=10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.052|pmid=28672197|bibcode=2017JEnvM.201..252P }}</ref> | |||
== Notes == | |||
<references group="nb"/> | |||
Many wind turbine blades are made of ], and have a lifetime of 20 years.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Journalist |first=Energy |date=2022-08-29 |title=How to manage future waste from wind turbine blades |url=https://www.energymagazine.com.au/how-to-manage-future-waste-from-wind-turbine-blades/ |access-date=2022-12-01 |website=Energy Magazine |language=en-US}}</ref> Blades are hollow: some blades are crushed to reduce their volume and then landfilled.<ref name="Argus">{{cite news |last1=Joe Sneve |title=Sioux Falls landfill tightens rules after Iowa dumps dozens of wind turbine blades |url=https://eu.argusleader.com/story/news/city/2019/08/27/why-sioux-falls-landfill-has-crack-down-dumping-minnesotas-wind-turbine-blades/2125629001/ |access-date=5 September 2019 |work=] |date=4 September 2019 |archive-date=24 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211124094305/https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/city/2019/08/27/why-sioux-falls-landfill-has-crack-down-dumping-minnesotas-wind-turbine-blades/2125629001/ |url-status=live }}</ref> However, as they can take a lot of weight they can be made into long lasting small bridges for walkers or cyclists.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2023-09-07 |title=Renewable energy: The upcycled wind turbines getting a second life |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-66735712 |access-date=2023-09-07}}</ref> Blade end-of-life is complicated,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Beauson |first1=J. |last2=Laurent |first2=A. |last3=Rudolph |first3=D. P. |last4=Pagh Jensen |first4=J. |date=2022-03-01 |title=The complex end-of-life of wind turbine blades: A review of the European context |journal=Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews |language=en |volume=155 |pages=111847 |doi=10.1016/j.rser.2021.111847 |s2cid=244696750 |issn=1364-0321|doi-access=free |bibcode=2022RSERv.15511847B }}</ref> and blades manufactured in the 2020s are more likely to be designed to be completely recyclable.<ref name=":8">{{Cite web |title=These bike shelters are made from wind turbines. |url=https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/10/recycle-bike-wind-turbine/ |access-date=2022-04-02 |website=World Economic Forum |date=19 October 2021 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
== References == | |||
{{Reflist|colwidth=25em|refs= | |||
<ref name=increasesBy2010>{{cite web|url=http://www.gwec.net/index.php?id=30&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=279&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=97&cHash=01e9c85e9f|title=Global wind capacity increases by 22% in 2010 – Asia leads growth|publisher= Global Wind Energy Council|accessdate=14 May 2011|date=2 February 2011}}</ref> | |||
Wind turbines also generate noise. At a distance of {{convert|300|m}}, this may be around 45 dB, which is slightly louder than a refrigerator. At {{convert|1.5|km|abbr=on|0}}, they become inaudible.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141215232603/http://www.gereports.com/post/92442325225/how-loud-is-a-wind-turbine |date=15 December 2014 }}. GE Reports (2 August 2014). Retrieved on 20 July 2016.</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Gipe, Paul |title=Wind Energy Comes of Age |url=https://archive.org/details/windenergycomeso00gipe |url-access=registration |date=1995 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-0-471-10924-2 |pages=–}}</ref> There are anecdotal reports of negative health effects on people who live very close to wind turbines.<ref>{{cite journal | author= Gohlke JM et al. Environmental Health Perspectives | title= Health, Economy, and Environment: Sustainable Energy Choices for a Nation | pmc=2430245 | year= 2008 | volume= 116 | issue= 6 | pages= A236–A237 | doi= 10.1289/ehp.11602 | journal= Environmental Health Perspectives | pmid= 18560493}}</ref> Peer-reviewed research has generally not supported these claims.<ref>Professor Simon Chapman. " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190522134504/https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/10559 |date=22 May 2019 }}" ] School of Public Health, April 2015</ref><ref>{{cite news | url = https://www.thestar.com/business/article/738734--wind-gets-clean-bill-of-health | title = Wind Gets Clean Bill of Health | last = Hamilton | first = Tyler | date = 15 December 2009 | newspaper = ] | pages = B1–B2 | access-date = 16 December 2009 | location = ] | archive-date = 18 October 2012 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121018233814/http://www.thestar.com/business/article/738734--wind-gets-clean-bill-of-health | url-status = live }}</ref><ref>Colby, W. David et al. (December 2009) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200618045430/https://canwea.ca/pdf/talkwind/Wind_Turbine_Sound_and_Health_Effects.pdf |date=18 June 2020 }}, Canadian Wind Energy Association.</ref> | |||
<ref name=SmallElectricity> Retrieved on 7 November 2008</ref> | |||
== Politics == | |||
<ref name=home-made>]'' 22 June 2008 "Home-made energy to prop up grid"] Retrieved on 7 November 2008</ref> | |||
=== Central government === | |||
<ref name=ceereCapInter>. Retrieved 24 January 2008.</ref> | |||
<ref name=MassMaritime> This 660 kW wind turbine has a capacity factor of about 19%.</ref> | |||
Although wind turbines with fixed bases are a mature technology and new installations are generally no longer subsidized,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Buljan |first=Adrijana |date=2022-11-11 |title=RWE Wins Dutch Subsidy-Free Offshore Wind Tender with 760 MW Project Including Green Hydrogen and Floating Solar |url=https://www.offshorewind.biz/2022/11/11/rwe-wins-dutch-subsidy-free-offshore-wind-tender-with-760-mw-project-including-green-hydrogen-and-floating-solar/ |access-date=2022-12-04 |website=Offshore Wind |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Chinese Offshore Wind Capacity Boom Driven By State Subsidies |url=https://www.rigzone.com/news/chinese_offshore_wind_capacity_boom_driven_by_state_subsidies-23-nov-2022-171136-article/ |access-date=2022-12-04 |website=www.rigzone.com |language=en |quote=A key driver of the rush to add capacity was the termination of central government subsidies at the end of 2021.}}</ref> floating wind turbines are a relatively new technology so some governments subsidize them, for example to use deeper waters.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Floating wind could be the key to clean energy transition |url=https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/07/floating-wind-float-like-a-wind-turbine-on-the-high-sea/ |access-date=2022-12-04 |website=World Economic Forum |date=27 July 2021 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=iesoOntarioWind> These wind farms have capacity factors of about 28–35%.</ref> | |||
] by some governments are slowing the growth of renewables.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Timperley |first=Jocelyn |date=2021-10-20 |title=Why fossil fuel subsidies are so hard to kill |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=598 |issue=7881 |pages=403–405 |doi=10.1038/d41586-021-02847-2 |pmid=34671143 |bibcode=2021Natur.598..403T |s2cid=239052649 |quote=Fossil-fuel subsidies are one of the biggest financial barriers hampering the world’s shift to renewable energy sources.|doi-access=free }}</ref> | |||
<ref name=capFactorsBigger>{{cite web|url=http://www.bwea.com/ref/capacityfactors.html |title=RenewableUK – BWEA Briefing on UK Wind Capacity Factors |publisher=Bwea.com |accessdate=7 January 2012}}</ref> | |||
Permitting of wind farms can take years and some governments are trying to speed up – the wind industry says this will help limit climate change and increase energy security<ref>{{Cite web |title=Explainer: What is offshore wind and what does its future look like? |url=https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/11/offshore-wind-farms-future-renewables/ |access-date=2022-12-04 |website=World Economic Forum |date=22 November 2022 |language=en}}</ref> – sometimes groups such as ] resist this<ref>{{Cite web |last=Richards |first=Heather |date=2022-12-01 |title=Biden wants to launch 16 offshore wind farms. Can he? |url=https://www.eenews.net/articles/biden-wants-to-launch16-offshore-wind-farms-can-he/ |access-date=2022-12-04 |website=E&E News |language=en-US}}</ref> but governments say that rules protecting biodiversity will still be followed.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Europe takes emergency action to remove permitting bottlenecks for wind power {{!}} REVE News of the wind sector in Spain and in the world |url=https://www.evwind.es/2022/11/08/europe-takes-emergency-action-to-remove-permitting-bottlenecks-for-wind-power/88716 |access-date=2022-12-04 |website=www.evwind.es |date=8 November 2022 |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=Windpowering>, 46. U.S. Department of Energy; Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy "20% Wind Energy by 2030"</ref> | |||
=== Public opinion === | |||
<ref name=ESB2004Study>ESB National Grid, Ireland's electric utility, in a 2004 study that, concluded that to meet the renewable energy targets set by the EU in 2001 would "increase electricity generation costs by a modest 15%" | |||
] | |||
Surveys of public attitudes across ] and in many other countries show strong public support for wind power.<ref name="com" /><ref name="vipublic">{{cite web |url= http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/ewea_documents/documents/publications/WD/WD22vi_public.pdf |title=A Summary of Opinion Surveys on Wind Power |access-date=17 January 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130502230544/http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/ewea_documents/documents/publications/WD/WD22vi_public.pdf |archive-date=2 May 2013 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="eon">{{cite web | url=http://eon-uk.com/generation/publicattitudes.aspx |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120504073200/http://eon-uk.com/generation/publicattitudes.aspx |archive-date=4 May 2012 |title=Public attitudes to wind farms |publisher=Eon-uk.com |date=28 February 2008 |access-date=17 January 2012}}</ref> Bakker et al. (2012) found in their study that residents who did not want turbines built near them suffered significantly more stress than those who "benefited economically from wind turbines".<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Bakker|first1=R.H.|last2=Pedersen|first2=E|date=2012|title=Impact of wind turbine sound on annoyance, self-reported sleep disturbance and psychological distress|journal=Science of the Total Environment|volume=425|pages=42–51|doi=10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.005|pmid=22481052|bibcode=2012ScTEn.425...42B|hdl=11370/e2c2a869-d1b6-4c61-ac35-2df8596a2402|s2cid=6845478 |url=https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/6778721/Bakker_2012_Sci_Total_Environm.pdf|hdl-access=free|access-date=14 December 2019|archive-date=18 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190218065746/https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/6778721/Bakker_2012_Sci_Total_Environm.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Although wind power is a popular form of energy generation, onshore or near offshore wind farms are sometimes opposed for their impact on the landscape (especially scenic areas, heritage areas and archaeological landscapes), as well as noise, and impact on tourism.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-03-24|title=Opposition to wind farm plans because of negative impact on 'tourism'|url=https://nation.cymru/news/opposition-to-wind-farm-plans-because-of-negative-impact-on-tourism/|access-date=2021-11-16|website=Nation.Cymru|language=en-GB|archive-date=16 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211116180821/https://nation.cymru/news/opposition-to-wind-farm-plans-because-of-negative-impact-on-tourism/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Schultz|first=Norm|title=Wind Farm Opposition in the Great Lakes|url=https://www.tradeonlytoday.com/columns-blogs/wind-farm-opposition-in-the-great-lakes|access-date=2021-11-16|website=Trade Only Today|date=29 June 2021 |language=en-us|archive-date=16 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211116180821/https://www.tradeonlytoday.com/columns-blogs/wind-farm-opposition-in-the-great-lakes|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
{{cite web | |||
| url= http://www.eirgrid.com/EirGridPortal/uploads/Publications/Wind%20Impact%20Study%20-%20main%20report.pdf | |||
| title= Impact of Wind Power Generation In Ireland on the Operation of Conventional Plant and the Economic Implications | |||
| date= February, 2004 | format= PDF | |||
| publisher= ESB National Grid | |||
| page= 36|archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080625045412/http://www.eirgrid.com/EirGridPortal/uploads/Publications/Wind+Impact+Study+-+main+report.pdf |archivedate = 25 June 2008 |quote= | |||
| accessdate=23 July 2008 }}</ref> | |||
In other cases, there is ]. The hundreds of thousands of people who have become involved in Germany's small and medium-sized wind farms demonstrate such support there.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://dsc.discovery.com/technology/my-take/community-wind-farm.html |title=Community Power Empowers |publisher=Dsc.discovery.com |date=26 May 2009 |access-date=17 January 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090325021002/http://dsc.discovery.com/technology/my-take/community-wind-farm.html |archive-date=25 March 2009 }}</ref> | |||
<ref name=slogin> Published: 26 August 2008</ref> | |||
A 2010 Harris Poll found strong support for wind power in Germany, other European countries, and the United States.<ref name="com" /><ref name="vipublic" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.eon-uk.com/generation/publicattitudes.aspx |title=Public attitudes to wind farms |publisher=Eon-uk.com |date=28 February 2008 |access-date=17 January 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120314142558/http://www.eon-uk.com/generation/publicattitudes.aspx |archive-date=14 March 2012}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=altamontPass>{{Dead link|date=August 2010}}</ref> | |||
Public support in the United States has decreased from 75% in 2020 to 62% in 2021, with the Democratic Party supporting the use of wind energy twice as much as the Republican Party.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/06/08/most-americans-support-expanding-solar-and-wind-energy-but-republican-support-has-dropped/ | title=Most Americans support expanding solar and wind energy, but Republican support has dropped | date=8 June 2021 }}</ref> President Biden has signed an executive order to begin building large scale wind farms.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/29/fact-sheet-biden-administration-jumpstarts-offshore-wind-energy-projects-to-create-jobs/ | title=FACT SHEET: Biden Administration Jumpstarts Offshore Wind Energy Projects to Create Jobs | newspaper=The White House | date=29 March 2021 }}</ref> | |||
<ref name=green-e> Retrieved on 20 May 2009</ref> | |||
In ], Shen et al. (2019) found that Chinese city-dwellers may be resistant to building wind turbines in urban areas, with a surprisingly high proportion of people citing an unfounded fear of radiation as driving their concerns.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Shen | first1 = Shiran Victoria | last2 = Cain | first2 = Bruce E. | last3 = Hui | first3 = Iris | title = Public receptivity in China towards wind energy generators: A survey experimental approach | journal = Energy Policy | volume = 129 | pages = 619–627 | doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.055| year = 2019| bibcode = 2019EnPol.129..619S | s2cid = 159387276 }}</ref> Also, the study finds that like their counterparts in OECD countries, urban Chinese respondents are sensitive to direct costs and wildlife externalities. Distributing relevant information about turbines to the public may alleviate resistance. | |||
<ref name=FourthReport> | |||
{{cite web | |||
| date=12 November 2008 | |||
| title=Chapter 7: Recommendations and Conclusions. In: Economic Affairs – Fourth Report, Session 2007–2008. The Economics of Renewable Energy | |||
| author=House of Lords Economic Affairs Select Committee | |||
| publisher=UK Parliament website | |||
| url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldeconaf/195/19510.htm | |||
| accessdate=6 September 2009}}</ref> | |||
=== Community === | |||
<ref name=LobbyingAfter> | |||
{{cite web | |||
| date=30 March 2010 | |||
| title=Solar, Wind Power Groups Becoming Prominent Washington Lobbying Forces After Years of Relative Obscurity | |||
| author=Cassandra LaRussa | |||
| publisher=OpenSecrets.org | |||
| url=http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/03/solar-wind-power-becoming-prominent.html}} | |||
{{See also|Community debate about wind farms}} | |||
</ref> | |||
], England, have been opposed for a number of reasons, including aesthetics, by some sectors of the population.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.visitcumbria.com/wc/windfarms.htm |title=Wind Farms in Cumbria |access-date=3 October 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081210060920/http://www.visitcumbria.com/wc/windfarms.htm |archive-date=10 December 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3661728.stm | title=Wind Turbulence over turbines in Cumbria | last=Arnold | first=James | work=BBC News | date=20 September 2004 | access-date=20 March 2012 | archive-date=17 May 2014 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140517122315/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3661728.stm | url-status=live }}</ref>]] | |||
<ref name=spendingOnNuclear>, ], 1 February 2010. In turn, citing: | |||
* Pasternak, Judy. , American University School of Communication, Investigative Journalism Workshop, with McClatchy Newspapers, 24 January 2010. Retrieved 3 July 2010.</ref> | |||
Many wind power companies work with local communities to reduce environmental and other concerns associated with particular wind farms.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=48671 |title=Group Dedicates Opening of 200 MW Big Horn Wind Farm: Farm incorporates conservation efforts that protect wildlife habitat |publisher=Renewableenergyaccess.com |access-date=17 January 2012 |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012192322/http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=48671 |archive-date=12 October 2007 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | first=Jeanette | last=Fisher | date=2006 | url=http://environmentpsychology.com/wind_power_midamerican's_intrepid_wind_farm1.htm | title=Wind Power: MidAmerican's Intrepid Wind Farm | publisher=Environmentpsychology.com | access-date=20 March 2012 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111102223323/http://environmentpsychology.com/wind_power_midamerican%27s_intrepid_wind_farm1.htm | archive-date=2 November 2011 | url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.agl.com.au/environment/sustainability/Pages/StakeholderEngagement.aspx | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080721003610/http://www.agl.com.au/environment/sustainability/Pages/StakeholderEngagement.aspx |archive-date=21 July 2008 | title=Stakeholder Engagement | publisher=Agl.com.au | date=19 March 2008}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=smallScaleCarbonTrust>{{cite web|url=http://www.carbontrust.com/resources/reports/technology/small-scale-wind-energy |title=Small-scale wind energy |publisher=Carbontrust.co.uk |accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref> | |||
In other cases there is ]. Appropriate government consultation, planning and approval procedures also help to minimize environmental risks.<ref name="com">{{cite web |url=http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/ewea_documents/documents/press_releases/factsheet_environment2.pdf |publisher=Renewable Energy House |title=Wind Energy and the Environment |access-date=17 January 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130228202639/http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/ewea_documents/documents/press_releases/factsheet_environment2.pdf |archive-date=28 February 2013 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.environment.gov.au/settlements/renewable/publications/pubs/wind-discussionpaper.pdf |title=National Code for Wind Farms |publisher=Environment.gov.au |access-date=17 January 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080905112322/http://www.environment.gov.au/settlements/renewable/publications/pubs/wind-discussionpaper.pdf |archive-date=5 September 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.publish.csiro.au/?act=view_file&file_id=EC140p6a.pdf |title=New standard and big investment for wind energy |publisher=Publish.csiro.au |date=17 December 2007 |access-date=20 March 2012 |archive-date=18 September 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080918231046/http://www.publish.csiro.au/?act=view_file&file_id=EC140p6a.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Some may still object to wind farms<ref name="wind-watch.org" /> but many say their concerns should be weighed against the need to address the threats posed by ],<ref>{{Cite news |title=Misinformation is derailing renewable energy projects across the United States |language=en |work=NPR.org |url=https://www.npr.org/2022/03/28/1086790531/renewable-energy-projects-wind-energy-solar-energy-climate-change-misinformation |access-date=2022-09-27}}</ref><ref name=":9" /> ]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Advantages and Challenges of Wind Energy |url=https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/advantages-and-challenges-wind-energy |access-date=2022-09-27 |website=Energy.gov |language=en}}</ref> and the opinions of the broader community.<ref>The Australia Institute (October 2006) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120225091609/http://www.tai.org.au/documents/dp_fulltext/DP91.pdf |date=25 February 2012}} Discussion Paper No. 91, {{ISSN|1322-5421}}, p. 28.</ref> | |||
In the US, wind power projects are reported to boost local tax bases, helping to pay for schools, roads, and hospitals, and to revitalize the economies of rural communities by providing steady income to farmers and other landowners.<ref name="nine" /> | |||
<ref name=UrbanWindDefinition>{{cite web|url=http://www.answers.com/topic/urban-wind |title=Urban Wind Definition at |publisher=Answers.com |accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref> | |||
In the UK, both the ] and the ] have expressed concerns about the effects on the rural landscape caused by inappropriately sited wind turbines and wind farms.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180926231807/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-northamptonshire-17367028 |date=26 September 2018 }}, ''BBC News'', 14 March 2012. Retrieved 20 March 2012.</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/environment/cpre_calls_for_action_over_proliferation_of_wind_turbines_1_1363291 | title = CPRE calls for action over 'proliferation' of wind turbines | last = Hill | first = Chris | date = 30 April 2012 | website = EDP 24 | publisher = Archant community Media Ltd | access-date = 30 April 2012 | archive-date = 1 May 2012 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120501102807/http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/environment/cpre_calls_for_action_over_proliferation_of_wind_turbines_1_1363291 | url-status = live }}</ref> | |||
<ref name=WindyCities>{{cite web|url=http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/News/presscentre/2007/230107_Smallscalwind.htm |title=Windy Cities? New research into the urban wind resource |publisher=Carbontrust.co.uk |accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref> | |||
] with Lochgoin Reservoir in the foreground.]] | |||
<ref name=CarbonSmallTrust>{{cite web|url=http://www.carbontrust.com/resources/reports/technology/small-scale-wind-energy|title= Smale scale wind energy|publisher=Carbontrust.com |accessdate=11 April 2012}}</ref> | |||
Some wind farms have become tourist attractions. The ] Visitor Centre has an exhibition room, a learning hub, a café with a viewing deck and also a shop. It is run by the ].<ref>{{cite web |url = http://www.whiteleewindfarm.co.uk/visitor_centre |title = Whitelee Windfarm |website = Scottish Power Renewables |url-status=dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120302104242/http://www.whiteleewindfarm.co.uk/visitor_centre |archive-date = 2 March 2012 |df = dmy-all}}</ref> | |||
In Denmark, a loss-of-value scheme gives people the right to claim compensation for loss of value of their property if it is caused by proximity to a wind turbine. The loss must be at least 1% of the property's value.<ref name="Danish-loss-of-value-scheme">{{cite book | url=http://www.ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/supply/renewable-energy/wind-power/Vindturbines%20in%20DK%20eng.pdf | title=Wind Turbines in Denmark | publisher=section 6.8, p. 22, Danish Energy Agency | date=November 2009 | isbn=978-87-7844-821-7 | url-status=dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131023055825/http://www.ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/supply/renewable-energy/wind-power/Vindturbines%20in%20DK%20eng.pdf | archive-date=23 October 2013 | df=dmy-all}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=ActiveFiltering>{{cite web|url=http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/iel5/8658/27439/01221533.pdf?arnumber=1221533 |title=Active filtering and load balancing with small wind energy systems |publisher=Ieeexplore.ieee.org |accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref> | |||
Despite this general support for the concept of wind power in the public at large, ] often exists and has delayed or aborted a number of projects.<ref>{{cite journal | url=http://www.shef.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.88117!/file/Understanding-wind-farm-opposition---Dr-Chris-Jones-PDF-674K-.pdf | title=Understanding 'local' opposition to wind development in the UK How big is a backyard? | doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.051 | year=2010 | last1=Jones | first1=Christopher R. | last2=Richard Eiser | first2=J. | journal=Energy Policy | volume=38 | issue=6 | page=3106 | bibcode=2010EnPol..38.3106J | access-date=14 January 2013 | archive-date=24 January 2013 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130124105605/http://www.shef.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.88117!/file/Understanding-wind-farm-opposition---Dr-Chris-Jones-PDF-674K-.pdf | url-status=live }}</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130118101946/http://www.wind-works.org/articles/tilting.html |date=18 January 2013 }}. Wind-works.org. Retrieved on 1 October 2013.</ref><ref>Yates, Ysabel (15 October 2012) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130119023610/http://www.ecomagination.com/testing-the-waters-gaining-public-support-for-offshore-wind |date=19 January 2013 }}. ecomagination.com</ref> | |||
<ref name=tacklingUS> | |||
As well as concerns about the landscape, there are concerns that some installations can produce excessive sound and vibration levels leading to a decrease in property values.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://rivercitymalone.com/wind-energy/town-councilor-regrets-wind-farm-high-sheldon-windfarm-ny/ |title=Town Councilor regrets High Sheldon Wind Farm (Sheldon, NY) |author1=Cramer, Glenn |date=30 October 2009 |access-date=4 September 2015 |archive-date=24 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924154038/http://rivercitymalone.com/wind-energy/town-councilor-regrets-wind-farm-high-sheldon-windfarm-ny/ |url-status=live }}</ref> A study of 50,000 home sales near wind turbines found no statistical evidence that prices were affected.<ref>Ben Hoen, Jason P. Brown, Thomas Jackson, Ryan Wiser, Mark Thayer and Peter Cappers. " {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151117033323/http://www.nwea.nl/sites/default/files/WOZ%20-%20Spatial%20hedonic%20analysis%20on%20surrounding%20property%20values%20%28Berkely%202013%29.pdf |date=17 November 2015 }}" p. 37. '']'', August 2013. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151118004839/https://emp.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/lbnl-6362e.pdf |date=18 November 2015 }}</ref> | |||
{{cite web| url=http://ases.org/images/stories/file/ASES/climate_change.pdf | title=Tackling Climate Change in the U.S|format=PDF | publisher= American Solar Energy Society| year=January 2007| accessdate=5 September 2007 }} | |||
</ref> | |||
While aesthetic issues are subjective and some find wind farms pleasant and optimistic, or symbols of ] and local prosperity, protest groups are often formed to attempt to block some wind power stations for various reasons.<ref name="wind-watch.org">{{cite web | url=http://www.wind-watch.org/affiliates.php | title=Wind Energy Opposition and Action Groups | publisher=Wind-watch.org | access-date=11 January 2013 | archive-date=5 May 2012 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120505130436/http://www.wind-watch.org/affiliates.php | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="guardian.co.uk">Gourlay, Simon (12 August 2008) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131005070554/http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/aug/12/windpower.alternativeenergy |date=5 October 2013 }}, ''The Guardian''.</ref><ref name="guardianQA">Aldred, Jessica (10 December 2007) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160313235603/http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2007/dec/10/windpower.renewableenergy |date=13 March 2016 }}, ''The Guardian''.</ref> | |||
<ref name=NGestimates>The UK System Operator, ] have quoted estimates of balancing costs for 40% wind and these lie in the range £500-1000M per annum. "These balancing costs represent an additional £6 to £12 per annum on average consumer electricity bill of around £390." | |||
Some opposition to wind farms is dismissed as ]ism,<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.thestar.com/comment/article/519708 | work=Toronto Star | location=Toronto | title=Windmills vs. NIMBYism | date=20 October 2008 | access-date=18 September 2017 | archive-date=11 October 2012 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121011113357/http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/519708 | url-status=live }}</ref> but research carried out in 2009 found that there is little evidence to support the belief that residents only object to wind farms because of a "Not in my Back Yard" attitude.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/1807322/wind-industry-avoid-branding-opponents-nimbys | title=Wind industry should avoid branding opponents "Nimbys" | last=Donoghue | first=Andrew | date=30 July 2009 | website=Business Green | access-date=13 April 2012 | archive-date=2 January 2012 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120102085646/http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/1807322/wind-industry-avoid-branding-opponents-nimbys | url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
{{cite web| work=National Grid | year=2008 | title=National Grid's response to the House of Lords Economic Affairs Select Committee investigating the economics of renewable energy| | |||
url=http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/EA273%20National%20Grid%20Response%20on%20Economics%20of%20Renewable%20Energy.pdf}}{{Dead link|date=August 2010}} | |||
</ref> | |||
=== Geopolitics === | |||
<ref name=minnesota>A study commissioned by the state of Minnesota considered penetration of up to 25%, and concluded that integration issues would be manageable and have incremental costs of less than one-half cent ($0.0045) per kW·h. | |||
Wind cannot be cut off unlike oil and gas so can contribute to ].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-03-09 |title=Why onshore wind, not fracking, offers Boris Johnson a better weapon against Vladimir Putin |url=https://inews.co.uk/opinion/fracking-onshore-wind-boris-johnson-uk-weapon-against-vladimir-putin-1506705 |access-date=2022-04-02 |website=inews.co.uk |language=en}}</ref> | |||
== Turbine design == | |||
{{cite web | |||
{{main|Wind turbine|Wind turbine design}} | |||
| url= http://www.puc.state.mn.us/docs/windrpt_vol%201.pdf | |||
{{see also|Wind-turbine aerodynamics}} | |||
| title= Final Report – 2006 Minnesota Wind Integration Study | |||
{{stack|float=right| | |||
| date= 30 November 2006 | format= PDF | |||
[[File:Wind turbine int.svg|thumb| Typical wind turbine components: {{ordered list | |||
| publisher= The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission | |||
|1=] | |||
|quote= | |||
|2=] | |||
| accessdate=15 January 2008 }}</ref> | |||
|3=] | |||
|4=Access ladder | |||
|5=] | |||
|6=] | |||
|7=] | |||
|8=] | |||
|9=] or ] | |||
|10=] | |||
|11=] | |||
|12=] | |||
|13=] | |||
}}]] | |||
|]}} | |||
]s are devices that convert the wind's ] into electrical power. The result of over a millennium of windmill development and modern engineering, today's wind turbines are manufactured in a wide range of horizontal axis and vertical axis types. The smallest turbines are used for applications such as ] for auxiliary power. Slightly larger turbines can be used for making small contributions to a domestic power supply while selling unused power back to the utility supplier via the electrical grid. Arrays of large turbines, known as wind farms, have become an increasingly important source of renewable energy and are used in many countries as part of a strategy to reduce their reliance on ]. | |||
<ref name=sinclairMerz>Sinclair Merz ''Growth Scenarios for UK Renewables Generation and Implications for Future Developments and Operation of Electricity Networks'' BERR Publication URN 08/1021 June 2008</ref> | |||
Wind turbine design is the process of defining the form and specifications of a wind turbine to extract energy from the wind.<ref>{{cite web | publisher =UK Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform | title =Efficiency and performance |url=http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file17821.pdf | access-date =29 December 2007 | url-status=dead | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20090205054846/http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file17821.pdf | archive-date =5 February 2009}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=clavertonReliable>{{cite web|url=http://www.claverton-energy.com/download/316/ |title=Claverton-Eneergy.com |accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref> | |||
A wind turbine installation consists of the necessary systems needed to capture the wind's energy, point the turbine into the wind, convert ] into ], and other systems to start, stop, and control the turbine. | |||
In 1919, the German physicist ] showed that for a hypothetical ideal wind-energy extraction machine, the fundamental laws of conservation of mass and energy allowed no more than 16/27 (59%) of the kinetic energy of the wind to be captured. This ] can be approached in modern turbine designs, which may reach 70 to 80% of the theoretical Betz limit.<ref>]; Randall, D. G. (trans.). ''Introduction to the Theory of Flow Machines'', Oxford: ], 1966.</ref><ref>Burton, Tony, et al., (ed). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160105145500/https://books.google.com/books?id=qVjtDxyN-joC |date=5 January 2016 }}, ], 2001, {{ISBN|0-471-48997-2}}, p. 65.</ref> | |||
<ref name=dinorwig></ref> | |||
The ] are not straightforward. The airflow at the blades is not the same as the airflow far away from the turbine. The very nature of how energy is extracted from the air also causes air to be deflected by the turbine. This affects the objects or other turbines downstream, which is known as "] effect". Also, the aerodynamics of a wind turbine at the rotor surface exhibit phenomena that are rarely seen in other aerodynamic fields. The shape and dimensions of the blades of the wind turbine are determined by the aerodynamic performance required to efficiently extract energy from the wind, and by the strength required to resist the forces on the blade.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/what-factors-affect-the-output-of-wind-turbines/ | title=What factors affect the output of wind turbines? | publisher=Alternative-energy-news.info | date=24 July 2009 | access-date=6 November 2013 | archive-date=29 September 2018 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180929021418/http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/what-factors-affect-the-output-of-wind-turbines/ | url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
<ref name=futureStorage>The Future of Electrical Energy Storage: The economics and potential of new technologies 2/1/2009 ID RET2107622</ref> | |||
In addition to the aerodynamic design of the blades, the design of a complete wind power system must also address the design of the installation's rotor hub, ], tower structure, generator, controls, and foundation.<ref>{{cite web |author1=Zehnder, Alan T. |author2=Warhaft, Zellman |name-list-style=amp |title=University Collaboration on Wind Energy |date=27 July 2011 |url=http://www.sustainablefuture.cornell.edu/attachments/2011-UnivWindCollaboration.pdf |publisher=Cornell University ] |access-date=22 August 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110901005908/http://www.sustainablefuture.cornell.edu/attachments/2011-UnivWindCollaboration.pdf |archive-date=1 September 2011 }}</ref> | |||
<ref name=smallWindSystems>{{cite web|url=http://www.seco.cpa.state.tx.us/re_wind_smallwind.htm |title=Small Wind Systems |publisher=Seco.cpa.state.tx.us |accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref> | |||
== History == | |||
<ref name=eolica>< Wind produces more than 60% of the electricity consumed in Spain during the early hours of this morning ></ref> | |||
{{Main|History of wind power}} | |||
]'s windmill of 1888, used for generating electric power.]]{{See also|Renewable energy commercialization#Wind_power}} | |||
Wind power has been used as long as humans have put ] into the wind. Wind-powered machines used to grind grain and pump water, the ] and ], were developed in what is now ], ], and ] by the 9th century.<ref>], ] (1986). ''Islamic Technology: An illustrated history'', p. 54. ]. {{ISBN|0-521-42239-6}}.</ref><ref>{{citation|last=Lucas|first=Adam|title=Wind, Water, Work: Ancient and Medieval Milling Technology|page=65|year=2006|publisher=Brill Publishers|isbn=90-04-14649-0}}</ref> Wind power was widely available and not confined to the banks of fast-flowing streams, or later, requiring sources of fuel. Wind-powered pumps drained the ], and in arid regions such as the ] or the ], wind pumps provided water for livestock and steam engines. | |||
The first windmill used for the production of electric power was built in ] in July 1887 by ] of ], Glasgow (the precursor of ]).<ref name="Price">{{Cite journal|last=Price|first=Trevor J|date=3 May 2005|title=James Blyth – Britain's First Modern Wind Power Engineer|journal=Wind Engineering|volume=29|issue=3|pages=191–200|doi=10.1260/030952405774354921|s2cid=110409210}}</ref> Blyth's {{convert|10|m|ft}} high cloth-sailed wind turbine was installed in the garden of his holiday cottage at ] in ], and was used to charge ] developed by the Frenchman ], to power the lighting in the cottage,<ref name="Price" /> thus making it the first house in the world to have its electric power supplied by wind power.<ref>{{cite web|last=Shackleton|first=Jonathan|title=World First for Scotland Gives Engineering Student a History Lesson|url=http://www.rgu.ac.uk/pressrel/BlythProject.doc|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081217063550/http://www.rgu.ac.uk/pressrel/BlythProject.doc|archive-date=17 December 2008|access-date=20 November 2008|publisher=The Robert Gordon University}}</ref> Blyth offered the surplus electric power to the people of Marykirk for lighting the main street, however, they turned down the offer as they thought electric power was "the work of the devil."<ref name="Price" /> Although he later built a wind turbine to supply emergency power to the local Lunatic Asylum, Infirmary, and Dispensary of ], the invention never really caught on as the technology was not considered to be economically viable.<ref name="Price" /> | |||
<ref name=abbess>{{cite web|author=Jo Abbess |url=http://www.claverton-energy.com/wind-energy-variability-new-reports.html |title=Wind Energy Variability and Intermittency in the UK |publisher=Claverton-energy.com |date=28 August 2009 |accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref> | |||
Across the Atlantic, in ], a larger and heavily engineered machine was designed and constructed in the winter of 1887–1888 by ].<ref>Anon. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170707215932/https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/mr-brushs-windmill-dynamo/ |date=7 July 2017 }}, '']'', Vol. 63 No. 25, 20 December 1890, p. 54.</ref> This was built by his engineering company at his home and operated from 1886 until 1900.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080908061207/http://www.windpower.org/en/pictures/brush.htm|date=8 September 2008}}, Danish Wind Industry Association. Accessed 2 May 2007.</ref> The Brush wind turbine had a rotor {{convert|17|m|ft}} in diameter and was mounted on an {{convert|18|m|ft}} tower. Although large by today's standards, the machine was only rated at 12 kW. The connected dynamo was used either to charge a bank of batteries or to operate up to 100 ]s, three arc lamps, and various motors in Brush's laboratory.<ref>"History of Wind Energy" in Cutler J. Cleveland (ed.) ''Encyclopedia of Energy''. Vol. 6, Elsevier, {{ISBN|978-1-60119-433-6}}, 2007, pp. 421–22</ref> | |||
<ref name=capacityCredit>{{Dead link|date=August 2010}}</ref> | |||
With the development of electric power, wind power found new applications in lighting buildings remote from centrally generated power. Throughout the 20th century parallel paths developed small wind stations suitable for farms or residences. | |||
From 1932 many isolated properties in ] ran their lighting and electric fans from batteries, charged by a "Freelite" wind-driven generator, producing 100{{nbsp}}watts of electrical power from as little wind speed as {{convert|10|mph}}.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article37240794 |title="Freelite" |newspaper=] |volume=11 |issue=561 |location=Queensland, Australia |date=16 December 1933 |accessdate=26 March 2023 |page=5 |via=National Library of Australia}}</ref> | |||
The ] triggered the investigation in Denmark and the United States that led to larger utility-scale wind generators that could be connected to electric power grids for remote use of power. By 2008, the U.S. installed capacity had reached 25.4 gigawatts, and by 2012 the installed capacity was 60 gigawatts.<ref>{{cite web|title=History of U.S. Wind Energy|url=https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/history-us-wind-energy|access-date=10 December 2019|website=Energy.gov|language=en|archive-date=15 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191215133631/https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/history-us-wind-energy|url-status=live}}</ref> Today, wind-powered generators operate in every size range between tiny stations for battery charging at isolated residences, up to gigawatt-sized ] that provide electric power to national electrical networks. The ] is working to augment these prospects.<ref>{{cite news |last= Widder |first= Jonathan |date= 25 October 2023|title= Saubere Energie unaufhaltsam, EU beschleunigt Windkraft-Ausbau, Luchse zurück nach Sachsen|url= https://squirrel-news.net/de/news/saubere-energie-unaufhaltsam-eu-beschleunigt-windkraft-ausbau-luchse-zurueck-nach-sachsen/|work= Squirrel News|access-date=7 March 2024}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="eirgrid renewables">{{cite web |url=http://www.eirgrid.com/renewables/ |title=Renewables |publisher=eirgrid.com |accessdate=22 November 2010}}</ref> | |||
In 2023, the global wind power sector experienced significant growth, with 116.6 gigawatts (GW) of new capacity added to the power grid, representing a 50% increase over the amount added in 2022. This surge in capacity brought the total installed wind power capacity worldwide to 1,021 GW by the end of the year, marking a growth of 13% compared to the previous year.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Alex |date=2024-04-15 |title=Global Wind Report 2024 |url=https://gwec.net/global-wind-report-2024/ |access-date=2024-04-18 |website=Global Wind Energy Council |language=en-US}}</ref>{{Rp|page=138}} | |||
<ref name="eirgrid impact">{{cite web |url=http://www.eirgrid.com/media/2004%20wind%20impact%20report%20(for%20updated%202007%20report,%20see%20above).pdf |title=Impact of Wind Power Generation in Ireland on the Operation of Conventional Plant and the Economic Implications |publisher=eirgrid.com |date=February 2004 |accessdate=22 November 2010}}</ref> | |||
== See also == | |||
<ref name=mysanantantonio>{{cite web|url=http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/weather/weatherwise/stories/MYSA092407.01A.State_windmills.3430a27.html |title=Quirky old-style contraptions make water from wind on the mesas of West Texas |publisher=Mysanantonio.com |date=23 September 2007 |accessdate=29 August 2010}}{{dead link|date=May 2011}}</ref> | |||
{{stack|float=right|{{Portal|Wind power|Renewable energy|Energy}}}} | |||
<ref name=quest>{{cite web|url=http://danielyergin.com |title=The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World |publisher=us.Penguingroup.com |date=20 September 2011 |accessdate=1 November 2011}}</ref> | |||
{{Div col}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
== Notes == | |||
<ref name="global council"> 2 July 2012</ref> | |||
{{notelist-ua}} | |||
<ref name="ieawind"> | |||
{{cite web | |||
| url= http://www.ieawind.org/AnnexXXV/Meetings/Oklahoma/IEA%20SysOp%20GWPC2006%20paper_final.pdf | |||
| title= "Design and Operation of Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power", IEA Wind Summary Paper | |||
| author= Hannele Holttinen, ''et al.'' | |||
|date = September 2006|format= PDF |publisher= Global Wind Power Conference 18–21 September 2006, Adelaide, Australia | |||
|quote= | |||
}}</ref> | |||
== References == | |||
<ref name=salerno>Salerno, E., AWEA Director of Industry and Data Analysis, as quoted in Shahan, Z. (2011) ''CleanTechnica.com''</ref> | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
== External links == | |||
<ref name="eiadoe">{{cite web| url= http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/ieo06/special_topics.html | title= International Energy Outlook |year=2006 |publisher= ] | |||
| page= 66 |quote=}}</ref> | |||
{{Commons category|Wind power}} | |||
<ref name=ccc> Costs of low-carbon | |||
* {{official website|http://gwec.net/}} of Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC) | |||
generation technologies May 2011 Committee on Climate Change</ref> | |||
* from Project Regeneration | |||
* {{official website|https://wwindea.org/}} of World Wind Energy Association (WWEA) | |||
* from the International Energy Agency | |||
* | |||
{{footer energy}} | |||
<ref name=juande>{{cite web |url=http://www.juandemariana.org/pdf/090327-employment-public-aid-renewable.pdf |title=Study of the effects on employment of public aid to renewable energy sources |publisher=juandemariana.org |date=March 2009 |accessdate=22 November 2010}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=nrelemployment>{{cite web |url=http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/46261.pdf |title=NREL Response to the Report Study of the Effects on Employment of Public Aid to Renewable Energy Sources from King Juan Carlos University (Spain) |publisher=nrel.gov |date=August 2009}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=meritorder>{{cite web|url=http://isi.fraunhofer.de/isi/publ/download/isi07a18/merit-order-effect.pdf?pathAlias=/publ/downloads/isi07a18/merit-order-effect.pdf|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/5sLyvXbZ6|archivedate=29 August 2010 |title=The Merit-Order Effect: A Detailed Analyis of the Price Effect of Renewable Electricity Generation on Spot Market Prices in Germany |format=PDF |accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=helming>Helming, Troy (2004) ''ArizonaEnergy.org''</ref> | |||
<ref name="GWEC_Market">{{cite web|url=http://www.gwec.net/index.php?id=180 |title=GWEC, Global Wind Report Annual Market Update |publisher=Gwec.net |accessdate=14 May 2011}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="GWEC_Forcast">{{cite web|url=http://www.gwec.net/index.php?id=181&L=0%B4 |title=GWEC, Global Wind Energy Outlook |publisher=Gwec.net |accessdate=14 May 2011}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="wwea"> | |||
{{cite web | |||
| publisher = ] | |||
| title = World Wind Energy Report 2010 | |||
| format = PDF | |||
| work = Report | |||
| date = February 2011 | |||
| url = http://www.wwindea.org/home/images/stories/pdfs/worldwindenergyreport2010_s.pdf | |||
| accessdate =8-August-2011}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=wor>{{cite web|url=http://vitalsigns.worldwatch.org/vs-trend/wind-power-increase-2008-exceeds-10-year-average |title=Wind Power Increase in 2008 Exceeds 10-year Average Growth Rate |publisher=Worldwatch.org |accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=ren212011>{{cite web |url=http://germanwatch.org/klima/gsr2011.pdf |title=Renewables 2011: Global Status Report |author=] |year=2011 |page=11 }}</ref> | |||
<ref name="claverton-energy.com">{{cite web|author=Jo Abbess |url=http://www.claverton-energy.com/wind-energy-variability-new-reports.html |title=Claverton-Energy.com |publisher=Claverton-Energy.com |date=28 August 2009 |accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Price"> | |||
{{Cite journal|last=Price|first=Trevor J|title=James Blyth – Britain's first modern wind power engineer|url=http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/mscp/wind/2005/00000029/00000003/art00002|journal=Wind Engineering|volume=29|issue=3|pages=191–200|date=3 May 2005|doi=10.1260/030952405774354921}} {{Dead link|date=May 2010}} | |||
</ref> | |||
<ref name=nine>American Wind Energy Association (2009). {{dead link|date=May 2011}} pp. 9–10.</ref> | |||
<ref name="eolicenergynews4082">{{cite web|url=http://www.eolicenergynews.org/?p=4082 |title=Spain becomes the first European wind energy producer after overcoming Germany for the first time |publisher=Eolic Energy News |date=31 December 2010 |accessdate=14 May 2011}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=gwec2007>{{cite web|url=http://www.gwec.net/index.php?id=30&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=121&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=4&cHash=f9b4af1cd0 |title=Continuing boom in wind energy – 20 GW of new capacity in 2007 |publisher=Gwec.net |accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=re>{{cite web|url=http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2009/03/btm-forecasts-340-gw-of-wind-by-2013?src=rss |title=BTM Forecasts 340-GW of Wind Energy by 2013 |publisher=Renewableenergyworld.com |date=27 March 2009 |accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=bt>BTM Consult (2009). </ref> | |||
<ref name=Danish-loss-of-value-scheme> | |||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="btm2010o">Madsen & Krogsgaard. '']'', 22 November 2010. Retrieved 22 November 2010.</ref> | |||
<ref name=Demeo2005> | |||
{{Cite journal | |||
| last1 = Demeo | first1 = E.A. | |||
| last2 = Grant | first2 = W. | |||
| last3 = Milligan | first3 = M.R. | |||
| last4 = Schuerger | first4 = M.J. | |||
| year = 2005 | |||
| title = Wind plant integration | |||
| journal = Power and Energy Magazine, IEEE | |||
| volume = 3 | |||
| issue = 6 | |||
| pages = 38–46 | |||
| doi = 10.1109/MPAE.2005.1524619 | |||
| url = http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1524619 | |||
| postscript = <!--None--> | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=Zavadil2005>{{Cite journal | |||
| last1 = Zavadil | first1 = R. | |||
| last2 = Miller | first2 = N. | |||
| last3 = Ellis | first3 = A. | |||
| last4 = Muljadi | first4 = E. | |||
| year = 2005 | |||
| title = Making connections | |||
| journal = Power and Energy Magazine, IEEE | |||
| volume = 3 | |||
| issue = 6 | |||
| pages = 26–37 | |||
| doi = 10.1109/MPAE.2005.1524618 | |||
| url = http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1524618 | |||
| postscript = <!--None--> | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="is windpower reliable">{{cite web|url=http://www.claverton-energy.com/is-wind-power-reliable-an-authoritative-article-from-david-millborrow-who-is-technically-experienced-and-numerate-unlike-many-other-commentators.html |title=Claverton-Energy.com |publisher=Claverton-Energy.com |accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Mitchell 2006">Mitchell 2006.</ref> | |||
<ref name="geothermal_incentive"> | |||
{{cite web | |||
|url=http://www.capitalelec.com/Energy_Efficiency/ground_source/index.html | |||
|title=Geothermal Heat Pumps | |||
|publisher=] | |||
|accessdate=5 October 2008 | |||
}} | |||
</ref> | |||
<ref name=windsun>. Retrieved 31 January 2008.</ref> | |||
<ref name="cleveland_water_crib"> | |||
{{cite web | |||
| url=http://www.development.cuyahogacounty.us/pdf_development/en-US/ExeSum_WindResrc_CleveWtrCribMntr_Reprt.pdf | |||
| title=Lake Erie Wind Resource Report, Cleveland Water Crib Monitoring Site, Two-Year Report Executive Summary | |||
| format=PDF | |||
| publisher=Green Energy Ohio | |||
| date=10 January 2008 | |||
| accessdate=27 November 2008 | |||
}} This study measured up to four times as much average wind power during winter as in summer for the test site.</ref> | |||
<ref name="combined_power_plant"> | |||
{{cite web | |||
| url=http://www.solarserver.de/solarmagazin/anlagejanuar2008_e.html | |||
| title=The Combined Power Plant: the first stage in providing 100% power from renewable energy | |||
| month=January | |||
| year=2008 | |||
| accessdate=10 October 2008 | |||
| publisher=SolarServer | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Denmark"> | |||
{{cite web | |||
| url= http://www.thomastelford.com/journals/DocumentLibrary/CIEN.158.2.66.pdf | |||
| title= Why wind power works for Denmark | |||
|date = May 2005|format= PDF |publisher= ] | |||
|quote= | |||
| accessdate=15 January 2008 }} | |||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="Czisch-Giebel"> Gregor Czisch, University of Kassel, Germany and Gregor Giebel, Risø National Laboratory, Technical University of Denmark</ref> | |||
<ref name="connecting_wind_farms"> | |||
{{cite web | |||
| url=http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-11/ams-tpo112107.php | |||
| title=The power of multiples: Connecting wind farms can make a more reliable and cheaper power source | |||
| date=21 November 2007 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=Archer2007>{{Cite journal | |||
| doi = 10.1175/2007JAMC1538.1 | |||
| title = Supplying Baseload Power and Reducing Transmission Requirements by Interconnecting Wind Farms | |||
| author = Archer, C. L.; Jacobson, M. Z. | |||
| year = 2007 | |||
| journal = Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology | |||
| volume = 46 | |||
| issue = 11 | |||
| pages = 1701–1717 | |||
| url = http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/winds/aj07_jamc.pdf | |||
| publisher = ] | |||
| postscript = <!--None--> | |||
|bibcode = 2007JApMC..46.1701A }}</ref> | |||
<ref name="BWEA"> (PDF).</ref> | |||
<ref name="Patel">"Wind and Solar Power Systems — Design, analysis and Operation" (2nd ed., 2006), Mukund R. Patel, p. 303</ref> | |||
<ref name="Jamieson">"Innovation in Wind Turbine Design" (2011), Peter Jamieson, p. 131</ref> | |||
<ref name="livestock_ignore"> | |||
{{cite web | |||
| url= http://www.uintacountyherald.com/V2_news_articles.php?heading=0&page=72&story_id=1299 | |||
| title =Capturing the wind | |||
| first =Erin | |||
| last =Buller | |||
| date =11 July 2008 | |||
| publisher =Uinta County Herald | |||
| accessdate =4 December 2008 | |||
}}"The animals don't care at all. We find cows and antelope napping in the shade of the turbines." – Mike Cadieux, site manager, Wyoming Wind Farm</ref> | |||
<ref name=mar>{{cite web|url=http://www.sustainabilitycentre.com.au/WindPowersStrength.pdf |title=Why Australia needs wind power |format=PDF |accessdate=7 January 2012}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Eilperin"> | |||
{{cite news | |||
| url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/15/AR2009041503622_2.html?hpid=topnews&sid=ST2009041602328 | |||
| title = Renewable Energy's Environmental Paradox | |||
| last = Eilperin | first= Juliet |coauthors= Steven Mufson | |||
| date = 16 April 2009 | |||
|work=The Washington Post | accessdate=17 April 2009 }} | |||
</ref> | |||
<ref name="rspb">{{cite web | |||
| url = http://www.rspb.org.uk/ourwork/policy/windfarms/index.asp | |||
| title = Wind farms | |||
| publisher = ] | |||
| accessdate =7 September 2008 | |||
| date = 14 September 2005 }}</ref> | |||
<ref name="blanketpeat">{{cite journal|last=Lindsay|first=Richard|date=October 2004|title=WIND FARMS AND BLANKET PEAT The Bog Slide of 16 October 2003 at Derrybrien, Co. Galway, Ireland|publisher=The Derrybrien Development Cooperatve Ltd|url=http://www.uel.ac.uk/erg/documents/Derrybrien.pdf|accessdate=20 May 2009}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="An_Urban_Experiment_in_Renewable_Energy"> | |||
{{cite web | |||
|url=http://www.greenbeanchicago.com/urban-experiment-renewable-energy/ | |||
|title=An Urban Experiment in Renewable Energy | |||
|first=William | |||
|last=Olson | |||
|date=15 February 2010 | |||
|accessdate=8 March 2010 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=guardianQA>Aldred, Jessica. , The Guardian, 10 December 2007.</ref> | |||
<ref name="guardian.co.uk">Gourlay, Simon. , The Guardian, 12 August 2008.</ref> | |||
<!-- The following references appeared in the reflist but were not used in the prior text. Please return them to the reflist once they have been correctly cited in the main article. | |||
<ref name=PerceptionOfNoise>{{cite journal|last=Pederson|first=Eja|date=December 2004|title=Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise—a dose–response relationship|publisher=Acoustic Society of America}}</ref> | |||
<ref name=ie>] (2009). p. 235.</ref> | |||
--> | |||
}} | |||
== External links == | |||
{{Commons category}} | |||
* | |||
{{Wind power}} | {{Wind power}} | ||
{{Wind power by country}} | {{Wind power by country}} | ||
{{Electricity |
{{Electricity delivery|state=collapsed}} | ||
{{Application of wind energy}} | {{Application of wind energy}} | ||
{{Renewable energy by country}} | {{Renewable energy by country}} | ||
{{Natural resources}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Wind Power}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 09:38, 29 December 2024
Electrical power generation from wind "Wind energy" redirects here. For the academic journal, see Wind Energy (journal).
Wind power is the use of wind energy to generate useful work. Historically, wind power was used by sails, windmills and windpumps, but today it is mostly used to generate electricity. This article deals only with wind power for electricity generation. Today, wind power is generated almost completely with wind turbines, generally grouped into wind farms and connected to the electrical grid.
In 2022, wind supplied over 2,304 TWh of electricity, which was 7.8% of world electricity. With about 100 GW added during 2021, mostly in China and the United States, global installed wind power capacity exceeded 800 GW. 32 countries generated more than a tenth of their electricity from wind power in 2023 and wind generation has nearly tripled since 2015. To help meet the Paris Agreement goals to limit climate change, analysts say it should expand much faster – by over 1% of electricity generation per year.
Wind power is considered a sustainable, renewable energy source, and has a much smaller impact on the environment compared to burning fossil fuels. Wind power is variable, so it needs energy storage or other dispatchable generation energy sources to attain a reliable supply of electricity. Land-based (onshore) wind farms have a greater visual impact on the landscape than most other power stations per energy produced. Wind farms sited offshore have less visual impact and have higher capacity factors, although they are generally more expensive. Offshore wind power currently has a share of about 10% of new installations.
Wind power is one of the lowest-cost electricity sources per unit of energy produced. In many locations, new onshore wind farms are cheaper than new coal or gas plants.
Regions in the higher northern and southern latitudes have the highest potential for wind power. In most regions, wind power generation is higher in nighttime, and in winter when solar power output is low. For this reason, combinations of wind and solar power are suitable in many countries.
Wind energy resources
Wind is air movement in the Earth's atmosphere. In a unit of time, say 1 second, the volume of air that had passed an area is . If the air density is , the mass of this volume of air is , and the power transfer, or energy transfer per second is . Wind power is thus proportional to the third power of the wind speed; the available power increases eightfold when the wind speed doubles. Change of wind speed by a factor of 2.1544 increases the wind power by one order of magnitude (multiply by 10).
The global wind kinetic energy averaged approximately 1.50 MJ/m over the period from 1979 to 2010, 1.31 MJ/m in the Northern Hemisphere with 1.70 MJ/m in the Southern Hemisphere. The atmosphere acts as a thermal engine, absorbing heat at higher temperatures, releasing heat at lower temperatures. The process is responsible for the production of wind kinetic energy at a rate of 2.46 W/m thus sustaining the circulation of the atmosphere against friction.
Through wind resource assessment, it is possible to estimate wind power potential globally, by country or region, or for a specific site. The Global Wind Atlas provided by the Technical University of Denmark in partnership with the World Bank provides a global assessment of wind power potential. Unlike 'static' wind resource atlases which average estimates of wind speed and power density across multiple years, tools such as Renewables.ninja provide time-varying simulations of wind speed and power output from different wind turbine models at an hourly resolution. More detailed, site-specific assessments of wind resource potential can be obtained from specialist commercial providers, and many of the larger wind developers have in-house modeling capabilities.
The total amount of economically extractable power available from the wind is considerably more than present human power use from all sources. The strength of wind varies, and an average value for a given location does not alone indicate the amount of energy a wind turbine could produce there.
To assess prospective wind power sites, a probability distribution function is often fit to the observed wind speed data. Different locations will have different wind speed distributions. The Weibull model closely mirrors the actual distribution of hourly/ten-minute wind speeds at many locations. The Weibull factor is often close to 2 and therefore a Rayleigh distribution can be used as a less accurate, but simpler model.
Wind farms
Main articles: Wind farm and List of onshore wind farmsWind farm | Capacity (MW) |
Country | Refs |
---|---|---|---|
Gansu Wind Farm | 7,965 | China | |
Muppandal Wind Farm | 1,500 | India | |
Alta (Oak Creek-Mojave) | 1,320 | United States | |
Jaisalmer Wind Park | 1,064 | India |
A wind farm is a group of wind turbines in the same location. A large wind farm may consist of several hundred individual wind turbines distributed over an extended area. The land between the turbines may be used for agricultural or other purposes. A wind farm may also be located offshore. Almost all large wind turbines have the same design — a horizontal axis wind turbine having an upwind rotor with 3 blades, attached to a nacelle on top of a tall tubular tower.
In a wind farm, individual turbines are interconnected with a medium voltage (often 34.5 kV) power collection system and communications network. In general, a distance of 7D (7 times the rotor diameter of the wind turbine) is set between each turbine in a fully developed wind farm. At a substation, this medium-voltage electric current is increased in voltage with a transformer for connection to the high voltage electric power transmission system.
Generator characteristics and stability
Most modern turbines use variable speed generators combined with either a partial or full-scale power converter between the turbine generator and the collector system, which generally have more desirable properties for grid interconnection and have low voltage ride through-capabilities. Modern turbines use either doubly fed electric machines with partial-scale converters or squirrel-cage induction generators or synchronous generators (both permanently and electrically excited) with full-scale converters. Black start is possible and is being further developed for places (such as Iowa) which generate most of their electricity from wind.
Transmission system operators will supply a wind farm developer with a grid code to specify the requirements for interconnection to the transmission grid. This will include the power factor, the constancy of frequency, and the dynamic behaviour of the wind farm turbines during a system fault.
Offshore wind power
The world's second full-scale floating wind turbine (and first to be installed without the use of heavy-lift vessels), WindFloat, operating at rated capacity (2 MW) approximately 5 km offshore of Póvoa de Varzim, PortugalOffshore windfarms, including floating windfarms, provide a small but growing fraction of total windfarm power generation. Such power generation capacity must grow substantially to help meet the IEA's Net Zero by 2050 pathway to combat climate change. Main articles: Offshore wind power and List of offshore wind farmsOffshore wind power is wind farms in large bodies of water, usually the sea. These installations can use the more frequent and powerful winds that are available in these locations and have less visual impact on the landscape than land-based projects. However, the construction and maintenance costs are considerably higher.
As of November 2021, the Hornsea Wind Farm in the United Kingdom is the largest offshore wind farm in the world at 1,218 MW.
Collection and transmission network
Near offshore wind farms may be connected by AC and far offshore by HVDC.
Wind power resources are not always located near to high population density. As transmission lines become longer, the losses associated with power transmission increase, as modes of losses at lower lengths are exacerbated and new modes of losses are no longer negligible as the length is increased; making it harder to transport large loads over large distances.
When the transmission capacity does not meet the generation capacity, wind farms are forced to produce below their full potential or stop running altogether, in a process known as curtailment. While this leads to potential renewable generation left untapped, it prevents possible grid overload or risk to reliable service.
One of the biggest current challenges to wind power grid integration in some countries is the necessity of developing new transmission lines to carry power from wind farms, usually in remote lowly populated areas due to availability of wind, to high load locations, usually on the coasts where population density is higher. Any existing transmission lines in remote locations may not have been designed for the transport of large amounts of energy. In particular geographic regions, peak wind speeds may not coincide with peak demand for electrical power, whether offshore or onshore. A possible future option may be to interconnect widely dispersed geographic areas with an HVDC super grid.
Wind power capacity and production
Main articles: Wind power by country and Wind power industryGrowth trends
Renewable energy sources, especially solar photovoltaic and wind power, are providing an increasing share of power capacity.Wind energy generation by regionWind generation by countryGraphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Number of countries with wind capacities in the gigawatt-scale by year 10 20 30 40 2005 2010 2015 2020 Growing number of wind gigawatt-markets Above 1-GW mark Above 10-GW mark Above 100-GW mark |
In 2020, wind supplied almost 1600 TWh of electricity, which was over 5% of worldwide electrical generation and about 2% of energy consumption. With over 100 GW added during 2020, mostly in China, global installed wind power capacity reached more than 730 GW. But to help meet the Paris Agreement's goals to limit climate change, analysts say it should expand much faster – by over 1% of electricity generation per year. Expansion of wind power is being hindered by fossil fuel subsidies.
The actual amount of electric power that wind can generate is calculated by multiplying the nameplate capacity by the capacity factor, which varies according to equipment and location. Estimates of the capacity factors for wind installations are in the range of 35% to 44%.
Capacity factor
Since wind speed is not constant, a wind farm's annual energy production is never as much as the sum of the generator nameplate ratings multiplied by the total hours in a year. The ratio of actual productivity in a year to this theoretical maximum is called the capacity factor. Online data is available for some locations, and the capacity factor can be calculated from the yearly output.
Penetration
Wind energy penetration is the fraction of energy produced by wind compared with the total generation. Wind power's share of worldwide electricity usage in 2021 was almost 7%, up from 3.5% in 2015.
There is no generally accepted maximum level of wind penetration. The limit for a particular grid will depend on the existing generating plants, pricing mechanisms, capacity for energy storage, demand management, and other factors. An interconnected electric power grid will already include reserve generating and transmission capacity to allow for equipment failures. This reserve capacity can also serve to compensate for the varying power generation produced by wind stations. Studies have indicated that 20% of the total annual electrical energy consumption may be incorporated with minimal difficulty. These studies have been for locations with geographically dispersed wind farms, some degree of dispatchable energy or hydropower with storage capacity, demand management, and interconnected to a large grid area enabling the export of electric power when needed. Electrical utilities continue to study the effects of large-scale penetration of wind generation on system stability.
A wind energy penetration figure can be specified for different duration of time but is often quoted annually. To generate almost all electricity from wind annually requires substantial interconnection to other systems, for example some wind power in Scotland is sent to the rest of the British grid. On a monthly, weekly, daily, or hourly basis—or less—wind might supply as much as or more than 100% of current use, with the rest stored, exported or curtailed. The seasonal industry might then take advantage of high wind and low usage times such as at night when wind output can exceed normal demand. Such industry might include the production of silicon, aluminum, steel, or natural gas, and hydrogen, and using future long-term storage to facilitate 100% energy from variable renewable energy. Homes and businesses can also be programmed to vary electricity demand, for example by remotely turning up water heater thermostats.
Variability
Main article: Variable renewable energy Further information: Grid balancingWind power is variable, and during low wind periods, it may need to be replaced by other power sources. Transmission networks presently cope with outages of other generation plants and daily changes in electrical demand, but the variability of intermittent power sources such as wind power is more frequent than those of conventional power generation plants which, when scheduled to be operating, may be able to deliver their nameplate capacity around 95% of the time.
Electric power generated from wind power can be highly variable at several different timescales: hourly, daily, or seasonally. Annual variation also exists but is not as significant. Because instantaneous electrical generation and consumption must remain in balance to maintain grid stability, this variability can present substantial challenges to incorporating large amounts of wind power into a grid system. Intermittency and the non-dispatchable nature of wind energy production can raise costs for regulation, incremental operating reserve, and (at high penetration levels) could require an increase in the already existing energy demand management, load shedding, storage solutions, or system interconnection with HVDC cables.
Fluctuations in load and allowance for the failure of large fossil-fuel generating units require operating reserve capacity, which can be increased to compensate for the variability of wind generation.
Utility-scale batteries are often used to balance hourly and shorter timescale variation, but car batteries may gain ground from the mid-2020s. Wind power advocates argue that periods of low wind can be dealt with by simply restarting existing power stations that have been held in readiness, or interlinking with HVDC.
The combination of diversifying variable renewables by type and location, forecasting their variation, and integrating them with dispatchable renewables, flexible fueled generators, and demand response can create a power system that has the potential to meet power supply needs reliably. Integrating ever-higher levels of renewables is being successfully demonstrated in the real world.
Solar power tends to be complementary to wind. On daily to weekly timescales, high-pressure areas tend to bring clear skies and low surface winds, whereas low-pressure areas tend to be windier and cloudier. On seasonal timescales, solar energy peaks in summer, whereas in many areas wind energy is lower in summer and higher in winter. Thus the seasonal variation of wind and solar power tend to cancel each other somewhat. Wind hybrid power systems are becoming more popular.
Predictability
Main article: Wind power forecastingFor any particular generator, there is an 80% chance that wind output will change less than 10% in an hour and a 40% chance that it will change 10% or more in 5 hours.
In summer 2021, wind power in the United Kingdom fell due to the lowest winds in seventy years, In the future, smoothing peaks by producing green hydrogen may help when wind has a larger share of generation.
While the output from a single turbine can vary greatly and rapidly as local wind speeds vary, as more turbines are connected over larger and larger areas the average power output becomes less variable and more predictable. Weather forecasting permits the electric-power network to be readied for the predictable variations in production that occur.
It is thought that the most reliable low-carbon electricity systems will include a large share of wind power.
Energy storage
Main article: Grid energy storage See also: List of energy storage projectsTypically, conventional hydroelectricity complements wind power very well. When the wind is blowing strongly, nearby hydroelectric stations can temporarily hold back their water. When the wind drops they can, provided they have the generation capacity, rapidly increase production to compensate. This gives a very even overall power supply and virtually no loss of energy and uses no more water.
Alternatively, where a suitable head of water is not available, pumped-storage hydroelectricity or other forms of grid energy storage such as compressed air energy storage and thermal energy storage can store energy developed by high-wind periods and release it when needed. The type of storage needed depends on the wind penetration level – low penetration requires daily storage, and high penetration requires both short- and long-term storage – as long as a month or more. Stored energy increases the economic value of wind energy since it can be shifted to displace higher-cost generation during peak demand periods. The potential revenue from this arbitrage can offset the cost and losses of storage. Although pumped-storage power systems are only about 75% efficient and have high installation costs, their low running costs and ability to reduce the required electrical base-load can save both fuel and total electrical generation costs.
Energy payback
The energy needed to build a wind farm divided into the total output over its life, Energy Return on Energy Invested, of wind power varies, but averages about 20–25. Thus, the energy payback time is typically around a year.
Economics
Onshore wind is an inexpensive source of electric power, cheaper than coal plants and new gas plants. According to BusinessGreen, wind turbines reached grid parity (the point at which the cost of wind power matches traditional sources) in some areas of Europe in the mid-2000s, and in the US around the same time. Falling prices continue to drive the Levelized cost down and it has been suggested that it has reached general grid parity in Europe in 2010, and will reach the same point in the US around 2016 due to an expected reduction in capital costs of about 12%. In 2021, the CEO of Siemens Gamesa warned that increased demand for low-cost wind turbines combined with high input costs and high costs of steel result in increased pressure on the manufacturers and decreasing profit margins.
Northern Eurasia, Canada, some parts of the United States, and Patagonia in Argentina are the best areas for onshore wind: whereas in other parts of the world solar power, or a combination of wind and solar, tend to be cheaper.
Electric power cost and trends
See also: Cost of electricity by sourceWind power is capital intensive but has no fuel costs. The price of wind power is therefore much more stable than the volatile prices of fossil fuel sources. However, the estimated average cost per unit of electric power must incorporate the cost of construction of the turbine and transmission facilities, borrowed funds, return to investors (including the cost of risk), estimated annual production, and other components, averaged over the projected useful life of the equipment, which may be more than 20 years. Energy cost estimates are highly dependent on these assumptions so published cost figures can differ substantially.
The presence of wind energy, even when subsidized, can reduce costs for consumers (€5 billion/yr in Germany) by reducing the marginal price, by minimizing the use of expensive peaking power plants.
The cost has decreased as wind turbine technology has improved. There are now longer and lighter wind turbine blades, improvements in turbine performance, and increased power generation efficiency. Also, wind project capital expenditure costs and maintenance costs have continued to decline.
In 2021, a Lazard study of unsubsidized electricity said that wind power levelized cost of electricity continues to fall but more slowly than before. The study estimated new wind-generated electricity cost from $26 to $50/MWh, compared to new gas power from $45 to $74/MWh. The median cost of fully deprecated existing coal power was $42/MWh, nuclear $29/MWh and gas $24/MWh. The study estimated offshore wind at around $83/MWh. Compound annual growth rate was 4% per year from 2016 to 2021, compared to 10% per year from 2009 to 2021.
The value of wind power
While the levelised costs of wind power may have reached that of traditional combustion based power technologies, the market value of the generated power is also lower due to the merit order effect, which implies that electricity market prices are lower in hours with substantial generation of variable renewable energy due to the low marginal costs of this technology. The effect has been identified in several European markets. For wind power plants exposed to electricity market pricing in markets with high penetration of variable renewable energy sources, profitability can be challenged.
Incentives and community benefits
Turbine prices have fallen significantly in recent years due to tougher competitive conditions such as the increased use of energy auctions, and the elimination of subsidies in many markets. As of 2021, subsidies are still often given to offshore wind. But they are generally no longer necessary for onshore wind in countries with even a very low carbon price such as China, provided there are no competing fossil fuel subsidies.
Secondary market forces provide incentives for businesses to use wind-generated power, even if there is a premium price for the electricity. For example, socially responsible manufacturers pay utility companies a premium that goes to subsidize and build new wind power infrastructure. Companies use wind-generated power, and in return, they can claim that they are undertaking strong "green" efforts. Wind projects provide local taxes, or payments in place of taxes and strengthen the economy of rural communities by providing income to farmers with wind turbines on their land.
The wind energy sector can also produce jobs during the construction and operating phase. Jobs include the manufacturing of wind turbines and the construction process, which includes transporting, installing, and then maintaining the turbines. An estimated 1.25 million people were employed in wind power in 2020.
Small-scale wind power
Main article: Small wind turbine Further information: MicrogenerationSmall-scale wind power is the name given to wind generation systems with the capacity to produce up to 50 kW of electrical power. Isolated communities, that may otherwise rely on diesel generators, may use wind turbines as an alternative. Individuals may purchase these systems to reduce or eliminate their dependence on grid electric power for economic reasons, or to reduce their carbon footprint. Wind turbines have been used for household electric power generation in conjunction with battery storage over many decades in remote areas.
Examples of small-scale wind power projects in an urban setting can be found in New York City, where, since 2009, several building projects have capped their roofs with Gorlov-type helical wind turbines. Although the energy they generate is small compared to the buildings' overall consumption, they help to reinforce the building's 'green' credentials in ways that "showing people your high-tech boiler" cannot, with some of the projects also receiving the direct support of the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority.
Grid-connected domestic wind turbines may use grid energy storage, thus replacing purchased electric power with locally produced power when available. The surplus power produced by domestic microgenerators can, in some jurisdictions, be fed into the network and sold to the utility company, producing a retail credit for the microgenerators' owners to offset their energy costs.
Off-grid system users can either adapt to intermittent power or use batteries, photovoltaic, or diesel systems to supplement the wind turbine. Equipment such as parking meters, traffic warning signs, street lighting, or wireless Internet gateways may be powered by a small wind turbine, possibly combined with a photovoltaic system, that charges a small battery replacing the need for a connection to the power grid.
Airborne wind turbines, such as kites, can be used in places at risk of hurricanes, as they can be taken down in advance.
Impact on environment and landscape
Main article: Environmental impact of wind powerThe environmental impact of electricity generation from wind power is minor when compared to that of fossil fuel power. Wind turbines have some of the lowest life-cycle greenhouse-gas emissions of energy sources: far less greenhouse gas is emitted than for the average unit of electricity, so wind power helps limit climate change. Use of engineered wood may allow carbon negative wind power. Wind power consumes no fuel, and emits no local air pollution, unlike fossil fuel power sources.
Onshore wind farms can have a significant visual impact. Due to a very low surface power density and spacing requirements, wind farms typically need to be spread over more land than other power stations. Their network of turbines, access roads, transmission lines, and substations can result in "energy sprawl"; although land between the turbines and roads can still be used for agriculture. Some wind farms are opposed for potentially spoiling protected scenic areas, archaeological landscapes and heritage sites. A report by the Mountaineering Council of Scotland concluded that wind farms harmed tourism in areas known for natural landscapes and panoramic views.
Habitat loss and fragmentation are the greatest potential impacts on wildlife of onshore wind farms, but the worldwide ecological impact is minimal. Thousands of birds and bats, including rare species, have been killed by wind turbine blades, though wind turbines are responsible for far fewer bird deaths than fossil-fueled power stations when climate change effects are included. Not including these effects, modern wind turbines kill about 0.273 birds per GWh in comparison with 0.200 by coal power plants. The effects of wind turbines on birds can be mitigated with proper wildlife monitoring.
Many wind turbine blades are made of fiberglass, and have a lifetime of 20 years. Blades are hollow: some blades are crushed to reduce their volume and then landfilled. However, as they can take a lot of weight they can be made into long lasting small bridges for walkers or cyclists. Blade end-of-life is complicated, and blades manufactured in the 2020s are more likely to be designed to be completely recyclable.
Wind turbines also generate noise. At a distance of 300 metres (980 ft), this may be around 45 dB, which is slightly louder than a refrigerator. At 1.5 km (1 mi), they become inaudible. There are anecdotal reports of negative health effects on people who live very close to wind turbines. Peer-reviewed research has generally not supported these claims.
Politics
Central government
Although wind turbines with fixed bases are a mature technology and new installations are generally no longer subsidized, floating wind turbines are a relatively new technology so some governments subsidize them, for example to use deeper waters.
Fossil fuel subsidies by some governments are slowing the growth of renewables.
Permitting of wind farms can take years and some governments are trying to speed up – the wind industry says this will help limit climate change and increase energy security – sometimes groups such as fishers resist this but governments say that rules protecting biodiversity will still be followed.
Public opinion
Surveys of public attitudes across Europe and in many other countries show strong public support for wind power. Bakker et al. (2012) found in their study that residents who did not want turbines built near them suffered significantly more stress than those who "benefited economically from wind turbines".
Although wind power is a popular form of energy generation, onshore or near offshore wind farms are sometimes opposed for their impact on the landscape (especially scenic areas, heritage areas and archaeological landscapes), as well as noise, and impact on tourism.
In other cases, there is direct community ownership of wind farms. The hundreds of thousands of people who have become involved in Germany's small and medium-sized wind farms demonstrate such support there.
A 2010 Harris Poll found strong support for wind power in Germany, other European countries, and the United States.
Public support in the United States has decreased from 75% in 2020 to 62% in 2021, with the Democratic Party supporting the use of wind energy twice as much as the Republican Party. President Biden has signed an executive order to begin building large scale wind farms.
In China, Shen et al. (2019) found that Chinese city-dwellers may be resistant to building wind turbines in urban areas, with a surprisingly high proportion of people citing an unfounded fear of radiation as driving their concerns. Also, the study finds that like their counterparts in OECD countries, urban Chinese respondents are sensitive to direct costs and wildlife externalities. Distributing relevant information about turbines to the public may alleviate resistance.
Community
See also: Community debate about wind farmsMany wind power companies work with local communities to reduce environmental and other concerns associated with particular wind farms. In other cases there is direct community ownership of wind farm projects. Appropriate government consultation, planning and approval procedures also help to minimize environmental risks. Some may still object to wind farms but many say their concerns should be weighed against the need to address the threats posed by air pollution, climate change and the opinions of the broader community.
In the US, wind power projects are reported to boost local tax bases, helping to pay for schools, roads, and hospitals, and to revitalize the economies of rural communities by providing steady income to farmers and other landowners.
In the UK, both the National Trust and the Campaign to Protect Rural England have expressed concerns about the effects on the rural landscape caused by inappropriately sited wind turbines and wind farms.
Some wind farms have become tourist attractions. The Whitelee Wind Farm Visitor Centre has an exhibition room, a learning hub, a café with a viewing deck and also a shop. It is run by the Glasgow Science Centre.
In Denmark, a loss-of-value scheme gives people the right to claim compensation for loss of value of their property if it is caused by proximity to a wind turbine. The loss must be at least 1% of the property's value.
Despite this general support for the concept of wind power in the public at large, local opposition often exists and has delayed or aborted a number of projects. As well as concerns about the landscape, there are concerns that some installations can produce excessive sound and vibration levels leading to a decrease in property values. A study of 50,000 home sales near wind turbines found no statistical evidence that prices were affected.
While aesthetic issues are subjective and some find wind farms pleasant and optimistic, or symbols of energy independence and local prosperity, protest groups are often formed to attempt to block some wind power stations for various reasons.
Some opposition to wind farms is dismissed as NIMBYism, but research carried out in 2009 found that there is little evidence to support the belief that residents only object to wind farms because of a "Not in my Back Yard" attitude.
Geopolitics
Wind cannot be cut off unlike oil and gas so can contribute to energy security.
Turbine design
Main articles: Wind turbine and Wind turbine design See also: Wind-turbine aerodynamicsWind turbines are devices that convert the wind's kinetic energy into electrical power. The result of over a millennium of windmill development and modern engineering, today's wind turbines are manufactured in a wide range of horizontal axis and vertical axis types. The smallest turbines are used for applications such as battery charging for auxiliary power. Slightly larger turbines can be used for making small contributions to a domestic power supply while selling unused power back to the utility supplier via the electrical grid. Arrays of large turbines, known as wind farms, have become an increasingly important source of renewable energy and are used in many countries as part of a strategy to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels.
Wind turbine design is the process of defining the form and specifications of a wind turbine to extract energy from the wind. A wind turbine installation consists of the necessary systems needed to capture the wind's energy, point the turbine into the wind, convert mechanical rotation into electrical power, and other systems to start, stop, and control the turbine.
In 1919, the German physicist Albert Betz showed that for a hypothetical ideal wind-energy extraction machine, the fundamental laws of conservation of mass and energy allowed no more than 16/27 (59%) of the kinetic energy of the wind to be captured. This Betz limit can be approached in modern turbine designs, which may reach 70 to 80% of the theoretical Betz limit.
The aerodynamics of a wind turbine are not straightforward. The airflow at the blades is not the same as the airflow far away from the turbine. The very nature of how energy is extracted from the air also causes air to be deflected by the turbine. This affects the objects or other turbines downstream, which is known as "wake effect". Also, the aerodynamics of a wind turbine at the rotor surface exhibit phenomena that are rarely seen in other aerodynamic fields. The shape and dimensions of the blades of the wind turbine are determined by the aerodynamic performance required to efficiently extract energy from the wind, and by the strength required to resist the forces on the blade.
In addition to the aerodynamic design of the blades, the design of a complete wind power system must also address the design of the installation's rotor hub, nacelle, tower structure, generator, controls, and foundation.
History
Main article: History of wind power See also: Renewable energy commercialization § Wind_powerWind power has been used as long as humans have put sails into the wind. Wind-powered machines used to grind grain and pump water, the windmill and wind pump, were developed in what is now Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan by the 9th century. Wind power was widely available and not confined to the banks of fast-flowing streams, or later, requiring sources of fuel. Wind-powered pumps drained the polders of the Netherlands, and in arid regions such as the American mid-west or the Australian outback, wind pumps provided water for livestock and steam engines.
The first windmill used for the production of electric power was built in Scotland in July 1887 by Prof James Blyth of Anderson's College, Glasgow (the precursor of Strathclyde University). Blyth's 10 metres (33 ft) high cloth-sailed wind turbine was installed in the garden of his holiday cottage at Marykirk in Kincardineshire, and was used to charge accumulators developed by the Frenchman Camille Alphonse Faure, to power the lighting in the cottage, thus making it the first house in the world to have its electric power supplied by wind power. Blyth offered the surplus electric power to the people of Marykirk for lighting the main street, however, they turned down the offer as they thought electric power was "the work of the devil." Although he later built a wind turbine to supply emergency power to the local Lunatic Asylum, Infirmary, and Dispensary of Montrose, the invention never really caught on as the technology was not considered to be economically viable.
Across the Atlantic, in Cleveland, Ohio, a larger and heavily engineered machine was designed and constructed in the winter of 1887–1888 by Charles F. Brush. This was built by his engineering company at his home and operated from 1886 until 1900. The Brush wind turbine had a rotor 17 metres (56 ft) in diameter and was mounted on an 18 metres (59 ft) tower. Although large by today's standards, the machine was only rated at 12 kW. The connected dynamo was used either to charge a bank of batteries or to operate up to 100 incandescent light bulbs, three arc lamps, and various motors in Brush's laboratory. With the development of electric power, wind power found new applications in lighting buildings remote from centrally generated power. Throughout the 20th century parallel paths developed small wind stations suitable for farms or residences. From 1932 many isolated properties in Australia ran their lighting and electric fans from batteries, charged by a "Freelite" wind-driven generator, producing 100 watts of electrical power from as little wind speed as 10 miles per hour (16 km/h).
The 1973 oil crisis triggered the investigation in Denmark and the United States that led to larger utility-scale wind generators that could be connected to electric power grids for remote use of power. By 2008, the U.S. installed capacity had reached 25.4 gigawatts, and by 2012 the installed capacity was 60 gigawatts. Today, wind-powered generators operate in every size range between tiny stations for battery charging at isolated residences, up to gigawatt-sized offshore wind farms that provide electric power to national electrical networks. The European Union is working to augment these prospects.
In 2023, the global wind power sector experienced significant growth, with 116.6 gigawatts (GW) of new capacity added to the power grid, representing a 50% increase over the amount added in 2022. This surge in capacity brought the total installed wind power capacity worldwide to 1,021 GW by the end of the year, marking a growth of 13% compared to the previous year.
See also
- 100% renewable energy
- Global Wind Day
- Hydrogen economy
- List of countries by renewable electricity production
- List of wind turbine manufacturers
- List of offshore wind farms
- Lists of wind farms
- Outline of wind energy
- Wind power by country
- Wind resource assessment
- Wind-powered vehicle
Notes
- California is an exception
References
- ^ "Global Electricity Review 2024". Ember. 7 May 2024. Retrieved 2 September 2024.
- ^ "Wind Power – Analysis". IEA. Archived from the original on 23 November 2021. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
- ^ "Wind energy generation vs. installed capacity". Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 19 October 2021. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
- "Global wind industry breezes into new record". Energy Live News. 25 March 2022. Retrieved 2 April 2022.
- ^ "Expansion of wind and solar power too slow to stop climate change". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 24 November 2021.
- ^ "What are the pros and cons of onshore wind energy?". Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science. 12 January 2018. Archived from the original on 22 June 2019.
- ^ Jones, Nathan F.; Pejchar, Liba; Kiesecker, Joseph M. (22 January 2015). "The Energy Footprint: How Oil, Natural Gas, and Wind Energy Affect Land for Biodiversity and the Flow of Ecosystem Services". BioScience. 65 (3): 290–301. doi:10.1093/biosci/biu224. ISSN 0006-3568. Retrieved 9 November 2022.
- "Global Wind Report 2019". Global Wind Energy Council. 19 March 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
- ^ "Levelized Cost Of Energy, Levelized Cost Of Storage, and Levelized Cost Of Hydrogen". Lazard.com. Retrieved 24 November 2021.
- "Global Wind Atlas". DTU Technical University of Denmark. Archived from the original on 24 February 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
- Nyenah, Emmanuel; Sterl, Sebastian; Thiery, Wim (1 May 2022). "Pieces of a puzzle: solar-wind power synergies on seasonal and diurnal timescales tend to be excellent worldwide". Environmental Research Communications. 4 (5): 055011. Bibcode:2022ERCom...4e5011N. doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ac71fb. ISSN 2515-7620. S2CID 249227821.
- ^ "Global Wind Atlas". Technical University of Denmark (DTU). Archived from the original on 18 January 2019. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
- "Global Wind Atlas". Archived from the original on 18 January 2019. Retrieved 14 June 2019.
- Huang, Junling; McElroy, Michael B (2015). "A 32-year perspective on the origin of wind energy in a warming climate" (PDF). Renewable Energy. 77: 482–92. Bibcode:2015REne...77..482H. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.12.045. S2CID 109273683. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 February 2015. Retrieved 6 February 2015.
- Mapping the World's Wind Energy Potential Archived 25 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine World Bank, 28 November 2017.
- New Global Wind Atlas to be presented at WindEurope Conference Archived 25 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine Technical University of Denmark, 21 November 2017.
- Staffell, Iain; Pfenninger, Stefan (1 November 2016). "Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output". Energy. 114: 1224–39. Bibcode:2016Ene...114.1224S. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.068. hdl:20.500.11850/120087.
- Hurley, Brian. "How Much Wind Energy is there?". Claverton Group. Archived from the original on 15 May 2012. Retrieved 8 April 2012.
- Savenkov, M (2009). "On the truncated weibull distribution and its usefulness in evaluating potential wind (or wave) energy sites" (PDF). University Journal of Engineering and Technology. 1 (1): 21–25. Archived from the original on 22 February 2015.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - "Describing Wind Variations: Weibull Distribution". Danish Wind Industry Association. Archived from the original on 2 August 2021. Retrieved 8 July 2021.
- Watts, Jonathan & Huang, Cecily. Winds Of Change Blow Through China As Spending On Renewable Energy Soars Archived 15 June 2013 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian, 19 March 2012, revised on 20 March 2012. Retrieved 4 January 2012.
- "Muppandal (India)". thewindpower.net. Archived from the original on 14 August 2014. Retrieved 21 November 2015.
- Terra-Gen Press Release Archived 10 May 2012 at the Wayback Machine, 17 April 2012
- Started in August 2001, the Jaisalmer based facility crossed 1,000 MW capacity to achieve this milestone Archived 1 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine. Business-standard.com (11 May 2012). Retrieved on 20 July 2016.
- "Wind Farm Electrical Systems" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 March 2021. Retrieved 11 July 2020.
- Meyers, Johan; Meneveau, Charles (1 March 2012). "Optimal turbine spacing in fully developed wind farm boundary layers". Wind Energy. 15 (2): 305–17. Bibcode:2012WiEn...15..305M. doi:10.1002/we.469.
- "Making of the modern offshore substation". Windpower Engineering & Development. Archived from the original on 24 November 2021. Retrieved 14 June 2019.
- ^ Falahi, G.; Huang, A. (1 October 2014). "Low voltage ride through control of modular multilevel converter based HVDC systems". IECON 2014 – 40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. pp. 4663–68. doi:10.1109/IECON.2014.7049205. ISBN 978-1-4799-4032-5. S2CID 3598534.
- Cheng, Ming; Zhu, Ying (2014). "The state of the art of wind energy conversion systems and technologies: A review". Energy Conversion and Management. 88: 332. Bibcode:2014ECM....88..332C. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.08.037.
- "ScottishPower in 'pioneering world first' after wind farm black-out boost". www.scotsman.com. 3 November 2020. Retrieved 19 September 2022.
- "As the grid adds wind power, researchers have to reengineer recovery from power outages". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 19 September 2022.
- Demeo, E.A.; Grant, W.; Milligan, M.R.; Schuerger, M.J. (2005). "Wind plant integration". IEEE Power and Energy Magazine. 3 (6): 38–46. doi:10.1109/MPAE.2005.1524619. S2CID 12610250.
- Zavadil, R.; Miller, N.; Ellis, A.; Muljadi, E. (2005). "Making connections". IEEE Power and Energy Magazine. 3 (6): 26–37. doi:10.1109/MPAE.2005.1524618. S2CID 3037161.
- Rosa-Aquino, Paola (29 August 2021). "Floating wind turbines could open up vast ocean tracts for renewable power". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 30 August 2021.
- Hulazan, Ned (16 February 2011). "Offshore wind power – Advantages and disadvantages". Renewable Energy Articles. Archived from the original on 13 October 2018. Retrieved 9 April 2012.
- Millborrow, David (6 August 2010). "Cutting the cost of offshore wind energy". Wind Power Monthly. Haymarket. Archived from the original on 2 December 2012. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
- "World's Largest Offshore Wind Farm Fully Up and Running". Offshore Wind. 30 January 2020. Archived from the original on 31 January 2020. Retrieved 3 February 2020.
- Action, BMWK-Federal Ministry for Economics Affairs and Climate. "Connecting offshore wind energy to the grid". www.bmwk.de. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
- Power System Analysis and Design. Glover, Sarma, Overbye/ 5th Edition
- wind-power-in-maine_2013-08-04.html?pagenum=full Inadequate transmission lines keeping some Maine wind power off the grid – The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram Archived 24 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine. Pressherald.com (4 August 2013). Retrieved on 20 July 2016.
- "From West to East: The Charged Challenge of Delivering Electricity". China Business Review. 7 April 2021. Retrieved 24 November 2021.
- Wald, Matthew (26 August 2008) Wind Energy Bumps Into Power Grid's Limits Archived 1 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine. New York Times
- Barnard, Michael (11 November 2021). "Breaking News: China & USA Joint Declaration On Climate Action Collaboration". CleanTechnica. Archived from the original on 12 November 2021. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
- "Share of cumulative power capacity by technology, 2010–2027". IEA.org. International Energy Agency (IEA). 5 December 2022. Archived from the original on 4 February 2023. Source states "Fossil fuel capacity from IEA (2022), World Energy Outlook 2022. IEA. Licence: CC BY 4.0."
- "Wind energy generation by region". Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 10 March 2020. Retrieved 15 August 2023.
- "GWEC, Global Wind Report Annual Market Update". Gwec.net. Archived from the original on 12 August 2019. Retrieved 20 May 2017.
- "bp Statistical Review of World Energy 2020" (PDF). BP p.l.c. pp. 55, 59. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 September 2020. Retrieved 23 October 2020.
- "UNDP: More spent on fossil fuel subsidies than fighting poverty". Africa Renewal. 29 October 2021. Retrieved 24 November 2021.
- Mohseni-Cheraghlou, Amin (23 February 2021). "Fossil fuel subsidies and renewable energies in MENA: An oxymoron?". Middle East Institute. Retrieved 24 November 2021.
- "COP26: How much is spent supporting fossil fuels and green energy?". BBC News. 15 November 2021. Retrieved 24 November 2021.
- Rick Tidball and others, "Cost and Performance Assumptions for Modeling Electricity Generation Technologies" Archived 21 August 2014 at the Wayback Machine, US National Renewable Energy Laboratory, November 2010, p.63.
- Massachusetts Maritime Academy — Bourne, Mass Archived 11 February 2007 at the Wayback Machine This 660 kW wind turbine has a capacity factor of about 19%.
- Wind Power in Ontario Archived 10 August 2014 at the Wayback Machine These wind farms have capacity factors of about 28–35%.
- "Share of electricity production from wind". Our World in Data. Retrieved 20 June 2024.
- "Renewable energy". BP. Archived from the original on 6 November 2020. Retrieved 15 January 2020.
- "BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2016 – Electricity" (PDF). BP. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 September 2016. Retrieved 12 September 2016.
- "BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2016 – Renewable energy" (PDF). BP. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 August 2016. Retrieved 12 September 2016.
- "Tackling Climate Change in the U.S" (PDF). American Solar Energy Society. January 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 November 2008. Retrieved 5 September 2007.
- "New research shows Wind turbines, configured right, could provide grid stability". Energy Post. 8 December 2021. Retrieved 25 January 2022.
- "Low winds blamed for fall in Scotland's renewable energy production". BBC News. 1 April 2022. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
- Andresen, Tino. "Molten Aluminum Lakes Offer Power Storage for German Wind Farms Archived 7 April 2017 at the Wayback Machine" Bloomberg, 27 October 2014.
- Luoma, Jon R. (13 July 2001). "The Challenge for Green Energy: How to Store Excess Electricity". E360.yale.edu. Archived from the original on 6 April 2013. Retrieved 8 November 2012.
- Buczynski, Beth (23 August 2012). "Power To Gas Technology Turns Excess Wind Energy Into Natural Gas". Revmodo.com. Archived from the original on 5 October 2012.
- "What is demand-side response". en.energinet.dk. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
- "Managing wind volatility in Ireland with demand response". GridBeyond. 18 July 2022. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
- "Demand Response – Analysis". IEA. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
- Katz, Cheryl. "The batteries that could make fossil fuels obsolete". www.bbc.com. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
- "Report: An additional 20GWh of battery storage could significantly reduce wind power curtailment in UK". Renewable Energy World. 14 January 2021. Archived from the original on 26 February 2021. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
- "Answers to the UK's wind energy storage issues are emerging – NS Energy". 9 September 2021. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
- Realisable Scenarios for a Future Electricity Supply based 100% on Renewable Energies Archived 1 July 2014 at the Wayback Machine Gregor Czisch, University of Kassel, Germany and Gregor Giebel, Risø National Laboratory, Technical University of Denmark
- "Annual variable renewable energy share and corresponding system integration phase in selected countries/regions, 2018 – Charts – Data & Statistics". IEA. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
- ^ Kaspar, F., Borsche, M., Pfeifroth, U., Trentmann, J., Drücke, J., and Becker, P.: A climatological assessment of balancing effects and shortfall risks of photovoltaics and wind energy in Germany and Europe, Adv. Sci. Res., 16, 119–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-16-119-2019 Archived 24 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine, 2019
- Wood, Shelby (21 January 2008) Wind + sun join forces at Washington power plant Archived 18 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine. The Oregonian.
- "Small Wind Systems". Seco.cpa.state.tx.us. Archived from the original on 23 October 2012. Retrieved 29 August 2010.
- "Lake Erie Wind Resource Report, Cleveland Water Crib Monitoring Site, Two-Year Report Executive Summary" (PDF). Green Energy Ohio. 10 January 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 December 2008. Retrieved 27 November 2008. This study measured up to four times as much average wind power during winter as in summer for the test site.
- "Turkish Cengiz evaluates expansion of its giant hybrid power plant". Balkan Green Energy News. 23 November 2021. Retrieved 24 November 2021.
- "Wind Systems Integration Basics". Archived from the original on 7 June 2012.
- Stevens, Pippa (29 September 2021). "UK energy titan SSE says low wind, driest conditions in 70 years hit renewable generation". CNBC. Archived from the original on 11 November 2021. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
- "'UK's largest electrolyser' could fuel hundreds of bus journeys with wind power each day". www.imeche.org. Archived from the original on 22 November 2021. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
- "Variability of Wind Power and other Renewables: Management Options and Strategies" (PDF). IEA. 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 December 2005.
- Santhosh, Madasthu; Venkaiah, Chintham; Kumar, D. M. Vinod (2020). "Current advances and approaches in wind speed and wind power forecasting for improved renewable energy integration: A review". Engineering Reports. 2 (6): e12178. doi:10.1002/eng2.12178. ISSN 2577-8196.
- Tong, Dan; Farnham, David J.; Duan, Lei; Zhang, Qiang; Lewis, Nathan S.; Caldeira, Ken; Davis, Steven J. (22 October 2021). "Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide". Nature Communications. 12 (1): 6146. Bibcode:2021NatCo..12.6146T. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26355-z. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 8536784. PMID 34686663.
- "Dinorwig Hydroelectric Plant, Wales". Thegreenage.co.uk. Archived from the original on 11 January 2013. Retrieved 11 January 2013.
- The Future of Electrical Energy Storage: The economics and potential of new technologies 2 January 2009 ID RET2107622
- Energy return on investment (EROI) for wind energy. The Encyclopedia of Earth (7 June 2007)
- Haapala, Karl R.; Prempreeda, Preedanood (2014). "Comparative life cycle assessment of 2.0 MW wind turbines". International Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing. 3 (2): 170. doi:10.1504/IJSM.2014.062496.
- "Onshore wind cost per kilowatt-hour". Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 19 November 2020. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
- "Onshore wind to reach grid parity by 2016" Archived 17 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine, BusinessGreen, 14 November 2011
- "World's largest offshore wind turbine maker warns of price pressures". Financial Times. 16 March 2021. Archived from the original on 24 June 2021. Retrieved 16 June 2021.
- Bogdanov, Dmitrii; Ram, Manish; Aghahosseini, Arman; Gulagi, Ashish; Oyewo, Ayobami Solomon; Child, Michael; Caldera, Upeksha; Sadovskaia, Kristina; Farfan, Javier; De Souza Noel Simas Barbosa, Larissa; Fasihi, Mahdi (15 July 2021). "Low-cost renewable electricity as the key driver of the global energy transition towards sustainability". Energy. 227: 120467. Bibcode:2021Ene...22720467B. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120467. ISSN 0360-5442. S2CID 233706454.
- Dolf Gielen. "Renewable Energy Technologies: Cost Analysis Series: Wind Power" International Renewable Energy Agency, June 2012. Quote: "wind is capital intensive, but has no fuel costs"
- Transmission and Wind Energy: Capturing the Prevailing Winds for the Benefit of Customers Archived 23 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine. National Grid US (September 2006).
- Rao, K.R (17 October 2019). Wind Energy for Power Generation: Meeting the Challenge of Practical Implementation. Springer Nature, 2019. ISBN 978-3319751344. Archived from the original on 24 November 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
- Danielson, David (14 August 2012). "A Banner Year for the U.S. Wind Industry". whitehouse.gov. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 1 March 2021 – via National Archives.
- Hirth, Lion (2013). "The market value of variable renewables: The effect of solar wind power variability on their relative price". Energy Economics. 38: 218–236. Bibcode:2013EneEc..38..218H. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.004. hdl:1814/27135. ISSN 0140-9883.
- Welisch, Marijke; Ortner, André; Resch, Gustav (2016). "Assessment of RES technology market values and the merit-order effect – an econometric multi-country analysis". Energy & Environment. 27 (1): 105–121. Bibcode:2016EnEnv..27..105W. doi:10.1177/0958305X16638574.
- Reed, Stanley (9 November 2017). "As Wind Power Sector Grows, Turbine Makers Feel the Squeeze". TNT. Archived from the original on 11 November 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
- "China's 2022 Wind Power Growth to Stay Strong Despite Subsidy End". www.fitchratings.com. Retrieved 24 November 2021.
- The 2010 Green-e Verification Report Archived 11 June 2013 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 20 May 2009
- ^ American Wind Energy Association (2009) Annual Wind Industry Report, Year Ending 2008 Archived 13 January 2013 at the Wayback Machine p. 11
- "Direct Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in Energy in Fiscal Year 2010". Report. Energy Information Administration. 1 August 2011. Archived from the original on 1 October 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- "WINDExchange: Wind Energy's Economic Impacts to Communities".
- "Wind energy industry – employment 2020". Statista. Retrieved 19 September 2022.
- "Small-scale wind energy". Carbontrust.co.uk. Archived from the original on 14 May 2013. Retrieved 29 August 2010.
- Dodge, Darrell M. "Part 2 – 20th Century Developments". Illustrated history of wind power development. TelosNet Web Development. Archived from the original on 28 March 2012. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
- Chanban, Matt A.V.; Delaquérière, Alain. Turbines Popping Up on New York Roofs, Along With Questions of Efficiency Archived 9 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times website, 26 May 2014, and in print on 27 May 2014, p. A19 of the New York edition.
- Home-made energy to prop up grid Archived 18 August 2014 at the Wayback Machine The Times 22 June 2008 Retrieved on 10 January 2013
- Ramirez Camargo, Luis; Nitsch, Felix; Gruber, Katharina; Valdes, Javier; Wuth, Jane; Dorner, Wolfgang (January 2019). "Potential Analysis of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Self-Sufficient Residential Use in Germany and the Czech Republic". Energies. 12 (21): 4185. doi:10.3390/en12214185.
- Kart, Jeff (13 May 2009). "Wind, Solar-Powered Street Lights Only Need a Charge Once Every Four Days". Clean Technica. Archived from the original on 17 November 2011. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
- Jones, Nicola. "The kites seeking the world's surest winds". www.bbc.com. Retrieved 2 April 2022.
- Buller, Erin (11 July 2008). "Capturing the wind". Uinta County Herald. Archived from the original on 31 July 2008. Retrieved 4 December 2008."The animals don't care at all. We find cows and antelope napping in the shade of the turbines." – Mike Cadieux, site manager, Wyoming Wind Farm
- ^ Dunnett, Sebastian; Holland, Robert A.; Taylor, Gail; Eigenbrod, Felix (8 February 2022). "Predicted wind and solar energy expansion has minimal overlap with multiple conservation priorities across global regions". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (6). Bibcode:2022PNAS..11904764D. doi:10.1073/pnas.2104764119. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 8832964. PMID 35101973.
- ^ "How Wind Energy Can Help Us Breathe Easier". Energy.gov. Retrieved 27 September 2022.
- "Swedish flatpack wood turbines could give wind power a green boost". 12 March 2023.
- Lothian, Andrew (2022). "Visual impacts and acceptability of wind farms to councillors and senior council staff in Britain". International Journal of Environmental Studies. 80: 113–136. doi:10.1080/00207233.2021.2017174. S2CID 245874077.
- "What are the pros and cons of onshore wind energy?". Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment. Archived from the original on 22 June 2019. Retrieved 12 December 2020.
- "Why Australia needs wind power" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
- "Wind energy Frequently Asked Questions". British Wind Energy Association. Archived from the original on 19 April 2006. Retrieved 21 April 2006.
- Dodd, Eimear (27 March 2021). "Permission to build five turbine wind farm at Kilranelagh refused". Irish Independent. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
- Kula, Adam (9 April 2021). "Department defends 500ft windfarm in protected Area of Outstanding Beauty". The News Letter. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
- "Building wind farms 'could destroy Welsh landscape'". BBC News. 4 November 2019. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
- Gordon, David. Wind farms and tourism in Scotland Archived 21 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine. Mountaineering Council of Scotland. November 2017. p.3
- Hosansky, David (1 April 2011). "Wind Power: Is wind energy good for the environment?". CQ Researcher.
- ^ Sovacool, B. K. (2013). "The avian benefits of wind energy: A 2009 update". Renewable Energy. 49: 19–24. Bibcode:2013REne...49...19S. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.074.
- Parisé, J.; Walker, T. R. (2017). "Industrial wind turbine post-construction bird and bat monitoring: A policy framework for Canada". Journal of Environmental Management. 201: 252–259. Bibcode:2017JEnvM.201..252P. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.052. PMID 28672197.
- Journalist, Energy (29 August 2022). "How to manage future waste from wind turbine blades". Energy Magazine. Retrieved 1 December 2022.
- Joe Sneve (4 September 2019). "Sioux Falls landfill tightens rules after Iowa dumps dozens of wind turbine blades". Argus Leader. Archived from the original on 24 November 2021. Retrieved 5 September 2019.
- "Renewable energy: The upcycled wind turbines getting a second life". BBC News. 7 September 2023. Retrieved 7 September 2023.
- Beauson, J.; Laurent, A.; Rudolph, D. P.; Pagh Jensen, J. (1 March 2022). "The complex end-of-life of wind turbine blades: A review of the European context". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 155: 111847. Bibcode:2022RSERv.15511847B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111847. ISSN 1364-0321. S2CID 244696750.
- "These bike shelters are made from wind turbines". World Economic Forum. 19 October 2021. Retrieved 2 April 2022.
- How Loud Is A Wind Turbine? Archived 15 December 2014 at the Wayback Machine. GE Reports (2 August 2014). Retrieved on 20 July 2016.
- Gipe, Paul (1995). Wind Energy Comes of Age. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 376–. ISBN 978-0-471-10924-2.
- Gohlke JM et al. Environmental Health Perspectives (2008). "Health, Economy, and Environment: Sustainable Energy Choices for a Nation". Environmental Health Perspectives. 116 (6): A236 – A237. doi:10.1289/ehp.11602. PMC 2430245. PMID 18560493.
- Professor Simon Chapman. "Summary of main conclusions reached in 25 reviews of the research literature on wind farms and health Archived 22 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine" Sydney University School of Public Health, April 2015
- Hamilton, Tyler (15 December 2009). "Wind Gets Clean Bill of Health". Toronto Star. Toronto. pp. B1 – B2. Archived from the original on 18 October 2012. Retrieved 16 December 2009.
- Colby, W. David et al. (December 2009) "Wind Turbine Sound and Health Effects: An Expert Panel Review" Archived 18 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Canadian Wind Energy Association.
- Buljan, Adrijana (11 November 2022). "RWE Wins Dutch Subsidy-Free Offshore Wind Tender with 760 MW Project Including Green Hydrogen and Floating Solar". Offshore Wind. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
- "Chinese Offshore Wind Capacity Boom Driven By State Subsidies". www.rigzone.com. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
A key driver of the rush to add capacity was the termination of central government subsidies at the end of 2021.
- "Floating wind could be the key to clean energy transition". World Economic Forum. 27 July 2021. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
- Timperley, Jocelyn (20 October 2021). "Why fossil fuel subsidies are so hard to kill". Nature. 598 (7881): 403–405. Bibcode:2021Natur.598..403T. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02847-2. PMID 34671143. S2CID 239052649.
Fossil-fuel subsidies are one of the biggest financial barriers hampering the world's shift to renewable energy sources.
- "Explainer: What is offshore wind and what does its future look like?". World Economic Forum. 22 November 2022. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
- Richards, Heather (1 December 2022). "Biden wants to launch 16 offshore wind farms. Can he?". E&E News. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
- "Europe takes emergency action to remove permitting bottlenecks for wind power | REVE News of the wind sector in Spain and in the world". www.evwind.es. 8 November 2022. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
- Chiu, Allyson; Guskin, Emily; Clement, Scott (3 October 2023). "Americans don't hate living near solar and wind farms as much as you might think". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 3 October 2023.
- ^ "Wind Energy and the Environment" (PDF). Renewable Energy House. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 February 2013. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
- ^ "A Summary of Opinion Surveys on Wind Power" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 May 2013. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
- "Public attitudes to wind farms". Eon-uk.com. 28 February 2008. Archived from the original on 4 May 2012. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
- Bakker, R.H.; Pedersen, E (2012). "Impact of wind turbine sound on annoyance, self-reported sleep disturbance and psychological distress" (PDF). Science of the Total Environment. 425: 42–51. Bibcode:2012ScTEn.425...42B. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.005. hdl:11370/e2c2a869-d1b6-4c61-ac35-2df8596a2402. PMID 22481052. S2CID 6845478. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 February 2019. Retrieved 14 December 2019.
- "Opposition to wind farm plans because of negative impact on 'tourism'". Nation.Cymru. 24 March 2021. Archived from the original on 16 November 2021. Retrieved 16 November 2021.
- Schultz, Norm (29 June 2021). "Wind Farm Opposition in the Great Lakes". Trade Only Today. Archived from the original on 16 November 2021. Retrieved 16 November 2021.
- "Community Power Empowers". Dsc.discovery.com. 26 May 2009. Archived from the original on 25 March 2009. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
- "Public attitudes to wind farms". Eon-uk.com. 28 February 2008. Archived from the original on 14 March 2012. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
- "Most Americans support expanding solar and wind energy, but Republican support has dropped". 8 June 2021.
- "FACT SHEET: Biden Administration Jumpstarts Offshore Wind Energy Projects to Create Jobs". The White House. 29 March 2021.
- Shen, Shiran Victoria; Cain, Bruce E.; Hui, Iris (2019). "Public receptivity in China towards wind energy generators: A survey experimental approach". Energy Policy. 129: 619–627. Bibcode:2019EnPol.129..619S. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.055. S2CID 159387276.
- "Wind Farms in Cumbria". Archived from the original on 10 December 2008. Retrieved 3 October 2008.
- Arnold, James (20 September 2004). "Wind Turbulence over turbines in Cumbria". BBC News. Archived from the original on 17 May 2014. Retrieved 20 March 2012.
- "Group Dedicates Opening of 200 MW Big Horn Wind Farm: Farm incorporates conservation efforts that protect wildlife habitat". Renewableenergyaccess.com. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
- Fisher, Jeanette (2006). "Wind Power: MidAmerican's Intrepid Wind Farm". Environmentpsychology.com. Archived from the original on 2 November 2011. Retrieved 20 March 2012.
- "Stakeholder Engagement". Agl.com.au. 19 March 2008. Archived from the original on 21 July 2008.
- "National Code for Wind Farms" (PDF). Environment.gov.au. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 September 2008. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
- "New standard and big investment for wind energy" (PDF). Publish.csiro.au. 17 December 2007. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 September 2008. Retrieved 20 March 2012.
- ^ "Wind Energy Opposition and Action Groups". Wind-watch.org. Archived from the original on 5 May 2012. Retrieved 11 January 2013.
- "Misinformation is derailing renewable energy projects across the United States". NPR.org. Retrieved 27 September 2022.
- "Advantages and Challenges of Wind Energy". Energy.gov. Retrieved 27 September 2022.
- The Australia Institute (October 2006) Wind Farms: The facts and the fallacies Archived 25 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine Discussion Paper No. 91, ISSN 1322-5421, p. 28.
- "Wind farm to be built near a Northamptonshire heritage site" Archived 26 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine, BBC News, 14 March 2012. Retrieved 20 March 2012.
- Hill, Chris (30 April 2012). "CPRE calls for action over 'proliferation' of wind turbines". EDP 24. Archant community Media Ltd. Archived from the original on 1 May 2012. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
- "Whitelee Windfarm". Scottish Power Renewables. Archived from the original on 2 March 2012.
- Wind Turbines in Denmark (PDF). section 6.8, p. 22, Danish Energy Agency. November 2009. ISBN 978-87-7844-821-7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 October 2013.
- Jones, Christopher R.; Richard Eiser, J. (2010). "Understanding 'local' opposition to wind development in the UK How big is a backyard?" (PDF). Energy Policy. 38 (6): 3106. Bibcode:2010EnPol..38.3106J. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.051. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 January 2013. Retrieved 14 January 2013.
- Tilting at Windmills: Public Opinion Toward Wind Energy Archived 18 January 2013 at the Wayback Machine. Wind-works.org. Retrieved on 1 October 2013.
- Yates, Ysabel (15 October 2012) Testing the Waters: Gaining Public Support for Offshore Wind Archived 19 January 2013 at the Wayback Machine. ecomagination.com
- Cramer, Glenn (30 October 2009). "Town Councilor regrets High Sheldon Wind Farm (Sheldon, NY)". Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 4 September 2015.
- Ben Hoen, Jason P. Brown, Thomas Jackson, Ryan Wiser, Mark Thayer and Peter Cappers. "A Spatial Hedonic Analysis of the Effects of Wind Energy Facilities on Surrounding Property Values in the United States Archived 17 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine" p. 37. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, August 2013. Mirror Archived 18 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine
- Gourlay, Simon (12 August 2008) Wind Farms Are Not Only Beautiful, They're Absolutely Necessary Archived 5 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian.
- Aldred, Jessica (10 December 2007) Q&A: Wind Power Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian.
- "Windmills vs. NIMBYism". Toronto Star. Toronto. 20 October 2008. Archived from the original on 11 October 2012. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
- Donoghue, Andrew (30 July 2009). "Wind industry should avoid branding opponents "Nimbys"". Business Green. Archived from the original on 2 January 2012. Retrieved 13 April 2012.
- "Why onshore wind, not fracking, offers Boris Johnson a better weapon against Vladimir Putin". inews.co.uk. 9 March 2022. Retrieved 2 April 2022.
- "Efficiency and performance" (PDF). UK Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 February 2009. Retrieved 29 December 2007.
- Betz, A.; Randall, D. G. (trans.). Introduction to the Theory of Flow Machines, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1966.
- Burton, Tony, et al., (ed). Wind Energy Handbook Archived 5 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine, John Wiley and Sons, 2001, ISBN 0-471-48997-2, p. 65.
- "What factors affect the output of wind turbines?". Alternative-energy-news.info. 24 July 2009. Archived from the original on 29 September 2018. Retrieved 6 November 2013.
- Zehnder, Alan T. & Warhaft, Zellman (27 July 2011). "University Collaboration on Wind Energy" (PDF). Cornell University Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 September 2011. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- Ahmad Y Hassan, Donald Routledge Hill (1986). Islamic Technology: An illustrated history, p. 54. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-42239-6.
- Lucas, Adam (2006), Wind, Water, Work: Ancient and Medieval Milling Technology, Brill Publishers, p. 65, ISBN 90-04-14649-0
- ^ Price, Trevor J (3 May 2005). "James Blyth – Britain's First Modern Wind Power Engineer". Wind Engineering. 29 (3): 191–200. doi:10.1260/030952405774354921. S2CID 110409210.
- Shackleton, Jonathan. "World First for Scotland Gives Engineering Student a History Lesson". The Robert Gordon University. Archived from the original on 17 December 2008. Retrieved 20 November 2008.
- Anon. Mr. Brush's Windmill Dynamo Archived 7 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Scientific American, Vol. 63 No. 25, 20 December 1890, p. 54.
- A Wind Energy Pioneer: Charles F. Brush Archived 8 September 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Danish Wind Industry Association. Accessed 2 May 2007.
- "History of Wind Energy" in Cutler J. Cleveland (ed.) Encyclopedia of Energy. Vol. 6, Elsevier, ISBN 978-1-60119-433-6, 2007, pp. 421–22
- ""Freelite"". The Longreach Leader. Vol. 11, no. 561. Queensland, Australia. 16 December 1933. p. 5. Retrieved 26 March 2023 – via National Library of Australia.
- "History of U.S. Wind Energy". Energy.gov. Archived from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 10 December 2019.
- Widder, Jonathan (25 October 2023). "Saubere Energie unaufhaltsam, EU beschleunigt Windkraft-Ausbau, Luchse zurück nach Sachsen". Squirrel News. Retrieved 7 March 2024.
- Alex (15 April 2024). "Global Wind Report 2024". Global Wind Energy Council. Retrieved 18 April 2024.
External links
- Official website of Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC)
- Wind from Project Regeneration
- Official website of World Wind Energy Association (WWEA)
- Dynamic Data Dashboard from the International Energy Agency
- Current global map of wind power density
Wind power by country | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||
Application of wind energy | |
---|---|
Wind power | |
Vehicle propulsion | |
Kite applications | |
Air current |
Renewable energy by country and territory | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa | |||||
Asia | |||||
Europe |
| ||||
North America | |||||
Oceania | |||||
South America | |||||
Natural resources | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Air |
| ||||||
Energy | |||||||
Land | |||||||
Life | |||||||
Water |
| ||||||
Related |
| ||||||