Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Banks et al. showed in 2008 that if {{math|''n''}} is a ] Descartes number not ] by <math>3</math>, then {{math|''n''}} has over a million distinct prime divisors.
Banks ''et al.'' showed in 2008 that if {{math|''n''}} is a ] Descartes number not ] by <math>3</math>, then {{math|''n''}} has over a million distinct prime divisors.
Tóth showed in 2021 that if <math>D=pq</math> denotes a Descartes number (other than Descartes’ example), with pseudo-prime factor <math>p</math>, then <math>q > 10^{12}</math>.
Tóth showed in 2021 that if <math>D=pq</math> denotes a Descartes number (other than Descartes’ example), with pseudo-prime factor <math>p</math>, then <math>q > 10^{12}</math>.
Revision as of 21:04, 15 October 2023
Number which would have been an odd perfect number if one of its composite factors were prime
where we ignore the fact that 22021 is composite (22021 = 19 ⋅ 61).
A Descartes number is defined as an odd number n = m ⋅ p where m and p are coprime and 2n = σ(m) ⋅ (p + 1), whence p is taken as a 'spoof' prime. The example given is the only one currently known.
If m is an odd almost perfect number, that is, σ(m) = 2m − 1 and 2m − 1 is taken as a 'spoof' prime, then n = m ⋅ (2m − 1) is a Descartes number, since σ(n) = σ(m ⋅ (2m − 1)) = σ(m) ⋅ 2m = (2m − 1) ⋅ 2m = 2n. If 2m − 1 were prime, n would be an odd perfect number.
Properties
Banks et al. showed in 2008 that if n is a cube-free Descartes number not divisible by , then n has over a million distinct prime divisors.
Tóth showed in 2021 that if denotes a Descartes number (other than Descartes’ example), with pseudo-prime factor , then .
Generalizations
John Voight generalized Descartes numbers to allow negative bases. He found the example . Subsequent work by a group at Brigham Young University found more examples similar to Voight's example, and also allowed a new class of spoofs where one is allowed to also not notice that a prime is the same as another prime in the factorization.
Andersen, Nickolas; Durham, Spencer ; Griffin, Michael J. ; Hales, Jonathan ; Jenkins, Paul ; Keck, Ryan ; Ko, Hankun ; Molnar, Grant; Moss, Eric ; Nielsen, Pace P. ; Niendorf, Kyle ; Tombs, Vandy; Warnick, Merrill ; Wu, Dongsheng (2020). "Odd, spoof perfect factorizations". J. Number Theory (234): 31-47. arXiv:2006.10697.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) arXiv version