Revision as of 13:12, 15 October 2013 edit23.30.31.237 (talk) Undid revision 577147926 by 69.248.60.222 (talk)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:13, 2 January 2025 edit undoTwoTs (talk | contribs)48 editsmNo edit summary | ||
(129 intermediate revisions by 70 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|none}} | |||
{{Infobox Election | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}} | |||
| election_name = Pennsylvania gubernatorial election, 2006 | |||
{{Infobox election | |||
| country = Pennsylvania | |||
| election_name = 2006 Pennsylvania gubernatorial election | |||
| type = presidential | |||
| country = Pennsylvania | |||
| ongoing = no | |||
| type = presidential | |||
| previous_election = Pennsylvania gubernatorial election, 2002 | |||
| ongoing = no | |||
| previous_year = 2002 | |||
| |
| previous_election = 2002 Pennsylvania gubernatorial election | ||
| previous_year = 2002 | |||
| next_year = 2010 | |||
| next_election = 2010 Pennsylvania gubernatorial election | |||
| election_date = November 7, 2006 | |||
| next_year = 2010 | |||
| image1 = ] | |||
| election_date = November 7, 2006 | |||
| candidate1 = ''']''' | |||
| image_size = x150px | |||
| running_mate1 = ''']''' | |||
| image1 = Image:Governor Rendell (169339909) (cropped).jpg | |||
| party1 = Democratic Party (United States) | |||
| |
| nominee1 = ''']''' | ||
| |
| running_mate1 = ''']''' | ||
| party1 = Democratic Party (United States) | |||
| image2 = ] | |||
| popular_vote1 = '''2,470,517''' | |||
| candidate2 = ] | |||
| percentage1 = '''60.33%''' | |||
| running_mate2 = ] | |||
| image2 = Image:Lynn Swann official photo (cropped).jpg | |||
| party2 = Republican Party (United States) | |||
| nominee2 = ] | |||
| popular_vote2 = 1,622,135 | |||
| running_mate2 = ] | |||
| percentage2 = 39.6% | |||
| party2 = Republican Party (United States) | |||
| map_image = Pennsylvania Gubernatorial Election Results by County, 2006.svg | |||
| popular_vote2 = 1,622,135 | |||
| map_size = 200px | |||
| percentage2 = 39.61% | |||
| map_caption = County Results | |||
| map_image = {{switcher | |||
| title = Governor | |||
|] | |||
| before_election = ] | |||
|County results | |||
| before_party = Democratic Party (United States) | |||
|] | |||
| after_election = ] | |||
|Congressional district results | |||
| after_party = Democratic Party (United States) | |||
|] | |||
|Precinct results | |||
|default=1 | |||
}} | |||
| map_size = 250px | |||
| map_caption = '''Rendell''': {{legend0|#7996e2|50–60%}} {{legend0|#6674de|60–70%}} {{legend0|#584CDE|70–80%}}{{legend0|#3933e5|80–90%}} {{legend0|#0D0596|>90%}}<br />'''Swann''': {{legend0|#e27f7f|50–60%}} {{legend0|#d75d5d|60–70%}} {{legend0|#d72f30|70–80%}} {{legend0|#C21B18|80–90%}} {{legend0|#A80000|>90%}}<br />'''Tie''': {{legend0|#ae8bb1|50%}} {{legend0|#808080|No data}} | |||
| title = Governor | |||
| before_election = ] | |||
| before_party = Democratic Party (United States) | |||
| after_election = ] | |||
| after_party = Democratic Party (United States) | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ElectionsPA}} | {{ElectionsPA}} | ||
The '''Pennsylvania gubernatorial election |
The '''2006 Pennsylvania gubernatorial election''' was held on November 7, 2006, and included the races for the ] and ]. Incumbent ] governor ] successfully ran for re-election. Pennsylvania's first female lieutenant governor, ], was also running for re-election. | ||
As of 2025, this is the most recent gubernatorial election in which the Democratic candidate has carried the following counties- ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. This is the last time any statewide race in Pennsylvania resulted in a candidate getting over 60% of the vote. | |||
Incumbent Governor ], a ], ran for re-election. Though some had speculated that Rendell would choose another running mate,<ref></ref> Pennsylvania's first female Lieutenant Governor, ] was also running for re-election. | |||
== |
==Background== | ||
Rendell and Knoll had the advantage of incumbency, important in the ] of Pennsylvania. Rendell's approval rating as of May 2006 was 62%.<ref></ref> | |||
Shortly after the 2002 Gubernatorial election, political observers speculated that ], ], ], ], ], ], ] would consider pursuing the GOP nomination.<ref>{{Cite web| title = GOP Shortlist for Governor| work = ]| publisher = The Publius Group | year = 2002| archiveurl = http://www.politicspa.com/FEATURES/ShortList06.htm| url = http://web.archive.org/web/20021108103838/www.politicspa.com/FEATURES/ShortList06.htm|archivedate=2002-11-08}}</ref> | |||
In the ], then ] ] won the state 50.6%-46.4% over then ] ] ]. In 2004, Senator ] carried the state 50.9%-48.4% over incumbent president ]. | |||
Four candidates where campaigning for governor,<ref></ref> but only two went on to appear on the ballot in November. Rendell and Swann both were unopposed for their respective major party nominations. Constitution candidate Hagan Smith was unable to secure the necessary signatures to appear on the ballot. On August 11, Green Party candidate Marakay Rogers withdrew her nominating papers, following a challenge by Pennsylvania Democrats, who alleged more than 69,000 signatures on the petitions were fake names, unregistered voters or illegible.<ref></ref> | |||
The challenge followed Republican Senator ]'s drive to collect signatures to put Green candidate Carl Romanelli on ].<ref></ref> | |||
Although the state had voted Democratic in eight of the past 12 presidential elections, its Congressional delegation had been majority Republican for years. The counties of ] and ] were the Democratic strongholds, while the central part of the state was where the Republican Party fared best. The 2005 statewide party registration had Democrats out-numbering Republicans in the state with 3,841,429 to 3,292,656, with 939,252 registered independent voters.<ref></ref> | |||
Rogers continued to campaign, hopeful that a federal appeals court would rule favorably in a lawsuit seeking to overturn the state's signature requirement for third party candidates.<ref></ref> | |||
==Democratic primary== | |||
* '''Democrat:''' ]<ref></ref> -- incumbent ]. Previously, he was the Chairman of the ] and ]. | |||
Michael Morrill, the ]'s nominee for governor in 2002, considered challenging Rendell on a progressive liberal platform. On February 13, 2006, Morrill however stated that he would not run, citing the toll his 2002 race took on his family.<ref name=MM>{{Cite web |url=http://www.morrillmajority.org/ |title=Morrill Majority |access-date=2021-06-10 |archive-date=2017-05-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170510125231/http://morrillmajority.org/ |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060322063529/http://www.politicspa.com/pressreleasedetailed.asp?id=1189 |date=2006-03-22 }}</ref> Rendell thus ran unopposed. | |||
===Results=== | |||
* '''Republican:''' ]<ref></ref> -- a retired ] football ], and former chairman of the ] | |||
{{Election box begin no change| title=Democratic primary results}} | |||
{{Election box candidate unopposed with party link|party = Democratic Party (United States) | |||
|candidate = ] (incumbent) | |||
}} | |||
{{Election box total no change|votes=654,985|percentage=100.00}}{{Election box end}} | |||
==Republican primary== | |||
* '''Green Party:''' ] (]), an attorney, liberal activist, and 2004 Green Party State ] nominee.<ref></ref> | |||
===Candidates=== | |||
====Declared==== | |||
* ], ] Hall-of Fame ] and chairman of the ] | |||
====Withdrew==== | |||
* '''Constitution Party:''' ] (]), a building contractor, conservative activist and chair of the ] Constitution Party.<ref></ref> | |||
* Jim Panyard, former president of the Pennsylvania Manufacturers Association | |||
* ], ] of the ] from ] | |||
* ], former lieutenant governor and the 1986 nominee | |||
====Declined==== | |||
Not running: | |||
* ], state senator from ] and nominee for lieutenant governor in 2002<ref name="GOP Shortlist for Governor">{{Cite web|title=GOP Shortlist for Governor |work=] |publisher=The Publius Group |year=2002 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20021108103838/http://www.politicspa.com/FEATURES/ShortList06.htm |url=http://www.politicspa.com/FEATURES/ShortList06.htm |archive-date=November 8, 2002 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
*Jim Panyard—the former president of the Pennsylvania Manufacturer's Association withdrew from the race in February 2006. His official statement cited poor fundraising and the lack of significant media attention among his reasons.<ref></ref> | |||
* ], former U.S. representative from ] and candidate for U.S. Senate in 2004<ref name="GOP Shortlist for Governor"/> | |||
* ], former governor<ref name="GOP Shortlist for Governor"/> | |||
* ], U.S. representative from ] (ran for re-election)<ref name="GOP Shortlist for Governor"/> | |||
* ], U.S. senator (ran for re-election)<ref name="GOP Shortlist for Governor"/> | |||
* ], District Attorney of Montgomery County and candidate for attorney general in 2004<ref name="GOP Shortlist for Governor"/> | |||
=== Campaign === | |||
*] -- the ] of the ]. Piccola officially entered the race in 2005 but withdrew in January 2006. Early polling of showed that his chances of winning the State Committee endorsement were slim. | |||
], ], Jim Panyard and ] all announced their intention to run in the Republican primary for governor in 2006. Scranton, who served two terms as ], was the son of popular former governor ], and a member of the wealthy ] was the early front-runner. However, a series of blunders by his campaign,<ref>{{cite web |title=Inquirer.com: Philadelphia local news, sports, jobs, cars, homes |url=http://articles.philly.com/2006-01-27/news/25411116_1_bill-scranton-campaign-manager-first-black-governor|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151120102827/http://articles.philly.com/2006-01-27/news/25411116_1_bill-scranton-campaign-manager-first-black-governor|url-status=dead|archive-date=November 20, 2015}}</ref> and a lack of momentum from the Piccola and Panyard campaigns moved Swann into presumptive nominee status.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Lynn Swann Goes Deep |url=https://www.si.com/vault/2006/02/27/8370760/lynn-swann-goes-deep}}</ref> The state Republican party then endorsed Swann, leading the three other candidates to drop out ahead of the March deadline to file for the primary. | |||
===Results=== | |||
*] -- a former Lieutenant Governor and the 1986 GOP nominee. He is also the son of former governor ]. On 25 January 2006 Scranton fired his campaign manager Jim Seif when he referred to Swann as "the rich white guy in this campaign" on a ] call-in show.<ref></ref> Seif was attempting to portray Swann as the favorite of the GOP political establishment. Scranton withdrew from the race on February 7, 2006, stating that he had found that Lynn Swann was receiving "near unanimous backing of the state and national parties." <ref></ref><ref></ref> | |||
{{Election box begin no change | title=Republican primary results}} | |||
{{Election box candidate unopposed with party link|party=Republican Party (United States)|candidate=]}} | |||
{{Election box total no change|votes=583,658|percentage=100.00}}{{Election box end}} | |||
==General election== | |||
*]<ref></ref> (Independent), one of three people declared "people of the year" by the ''Philadelphia Inquirer'', for his work in exposing the clandestine pay raise the General Assembly voted themselves at 2am just before adjournment in July 2005. His running mate would have been ], a former GOP state committeeman, conservative activist, and frequent candidate. Diamond ended his campaign due to an inability to meet the petition requirements to get on the ballot as an independent. | |||
===Candidates=== | |||
* ], incumbent ] (Democratic)<ref></ref> | |||
*Michael Morrill—he is a political activist and was the ]'s nominee for governor in 2002. Had he run as a Democrat, Morrill likely would have attempted to court support from the progressive wing of the Democratic Party by attacking what he perceives as flaws in Governor Rendell's record on labor unions, civil liberties, and poverty alleviation. Morrill announced on February 13, 2006, that he would not run, citing the "toll" his 2002 race took on him and his family.<ref name=MM></ref><ref></ref> | |||
* ], former ] ] ] and chairman of the ] (Republican)<ref></ref> | |||
** Running mate: ], ] Commissioner and brother of ] | |||
== |
==== Withdrew ==== | ||
Rendell and Knoll had the advantage of incumbency, important in the ] of Pennsylvania. Rendell's approval rating as of May 2006 was 62%.<ref></ref> | |||
* Marakay Rogers, attorney and 2004 ] nominee<ref></ref> (Green) | |||
Challenging Rendell was former ] ], ] (R). His running mate was businessman ], ] Commisoner and the brother of MSNBC's ]. | |||
==== Failed to submit signatures ==== | |||
In the ], then ] ] won the state 51%-47% over then ] ] ]. In 2004, Senator ] carried the state 51%-49% over incumbent President ]. | |||
* Hagan Smith, building contractor and chair of ] Constitution Party (Constitution)<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060129012500/http://www.hagan4gov.com/index_001.htm|date=2006-01-29}}</ref> | |||
Although the state has voted Democratic for 8 of the past 12 presidential elections, its Congressional delegation has been majority Republican for years. The counties of ] and ] are the Democratic strongholds (Philadelphia: 75% Democrat, Allegheny: 60% Democrat), while the central part of the state is where the Republican Party fares best. The statewide party registration is:<ref></ref> | |||
* ], 2005 General Assembly pay raise whistleblower (Independent)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Russ Diamond's Campaign Website |url=http://www.russdiamond.org/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160715194108/http://russdiamond.org/ |archive-date=2016-07-15 |access-date=2018-12-01}}</ref> | |||
{| align=center class="wikitable" | |||
** Running mate: Tom Lingenfelter, former Republican state committeeman and perennial candidate | |||
|- bgcolor=lightgrey | |||
! width="125px" | Party | |||
! width="100px" | Count | |||
! width="60px" | Share | |||
|- | |||
Four candidates were campaigning for governor,<ref></ref> but only two went on to appear on the ballot in November. Constitution candidate Hagan Smith and Independent candidate ] were unable to secure the necessary signatures to appear on the ballot. On August 11, Green Party candidate Marakay Rogers withdrew her nominating papers, following a challenge by Pennsylvania Democrats, who alleged more than 69,000 signatures on the petitions were fake names, unregistered voters or illegible.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Green Party candidates give up |url=http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_4170340 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110926204547/http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_4170340 |archive-date=2011-09-26 |access-date=2006-08-15 |website=]}}</ref> The challenge followed a Republican drive to collect signatures to put Green candidate Carl Romanelli on ] in the Senate race.<ref>{{Dead link|date=December 2018|bot=InternetArchiveBot|fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> | |||
!align="center"| Democratic | |||
|align="right" | 3,841,429 | |||
Rogers continued to campaign, hopeful that a federal appeals court would rule favorably in a lawsuit seeking to overturn the state's signature requirement for third-party candidates.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930041454/http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=15911078&BRD=2212&PAG=461&dept_id=465812&rfi=6|date=2007-09-30}}</ref> | |||
|align="right" | 47.6% | |||
=== Analysis === | |||
] ] courts voters tailgating before a football game between Pennsylvania's two football teams, the ] and the ].<ref name="Ritter">{{cite news |last=Ritter |first=Kara |date=August 2006 |title=Ex-Steeler looks to sway support of Eagles' fans |work=] |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_kmtpi/is_200608/ai_n16967992}}</ref>]] | |||
In July 2005, a Zogby Poll showed Rendell with only a 47% to 41% lead over Lynn Swann. Some speculated that controversy over Act 72, proposed Medicaid cuts, and possibly even a ] that was signed into law had reduced the Governor's popularity.{{Citation needed|date=February 2007}} Rendell led in other recent polls by significantly higher margins. Following that poll, Rendell's supporters pointed out that he has raised more money than his opponents{{Citation needed|date=March 2010}}, which they felt would help him spread his message{{Citation needed|date=March 2010}}. They also pointed out that as a sitting governor, Rendell had all of the traditional advantages of an incumbent.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051214003402/http://www.fandm.edu/x7706.xml|date=2005-12-14}}</ref><ref> (]) Center for Politics & Public Affairs {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051218202657/http://www.fandm.edu/politics.xml|date=2005-12-18}}</ref> | |||
Swann hoped to perform strongly in the conservative "T" section of the state (the central and northern regions) and in his native ] area{{Citation needed|date=March 2010}}. ] canvassed for votes among ] voters in ] before the ] game against the ].<ref name="Ritter" /> On February 7, Swann served as master of ceremonies for the ]'s ] victory parade before 250,000 people.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120906105900/http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/sports/steelers/s_421528.html|date=2012-09-06}} ''Pittsburgh Tribune-Review''</ref> Polls in early February showed Swann and Rendell in a statistical tie.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080408042942/http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_422413.html|date=2008-04-08}} ''Pittsburgh Tribune-Review''</ref> However, Swann's momentum did not survive an effective barrage of advertising from ] in early spring and had trouble keeping up with Rendell's effective fundraising.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Barnes |first1=Tom |last2=Roddy |first2=Dennis B. |date=November 8, 2006 |title=Rendell cruises to 2nd term as governor |work=Pittsburgh Post-Gazette |url=http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06312/736519-178.stm}}</ref> Swann's focus on reform never caught traction, possibly as a result of his vocal support for ] and ], two legislative leaders who were defeated in the May 2006 primary election.<ref>{{cite news |last=Deparle |first=Jason |date=May 18, 2006 |title=G.O.P. Conservatives Topple Veteran State Lawmakers in Pennsylvania |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/18/us/18repubs.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=Brightbill&st=nyt&oref=slogin |access-date=May 22, 2010}}</ref> | |||
=== Predictions === | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Source | |||
!align="center"| Republican | |||
! Ranking | |||
|align="right" | 3,292,656 | |||
! As of | |||
|align="right" | 40.8% | |||
|- | |- | ||
| align="left" | ]<ref>{{Cite web|title=2006 Governor Race Ratings for November 6, 2006|url=https://cookpolitical.com/races/report_pdfs/2006_gov_ratings_nov6.pdf|website=The Cook Political Report|access-date=October 1, 2006|archive-date=June 5, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080605094803/https://cookpolitical.com/races/report_pdfs/2006_gov_ratings_nov6.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
!align="center"| Other | |||
| {{USRaceRating|Solid|D}} | |||
|align="right" | 939,252 | |||
| November 6, 2006 | |||
|align="right" | 11.6% | |||
|- | |- | ||
| align="left" | ]<ref>{{cite web | title=Election Eve 2006: THE FINAL PREDICTIONS | url=https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/ljs2006110601/ | website=Sabato's Crystal Ball | date=6 November 2006 | access-date=June 25, 2021}}</ref> | |||
| {{USRaceRating|Likely|D}} | |||
| November 6, 2006 | |||
|- | |||
| align="left" | ]<ref>{{cite web | title=2006 Gubernatorial Ratings | url=https://www.insideelections.com/ratings/governor/2006-gubernatorial-ratings | work=Senate Ratings | publisher=The Rothenberg Political Report | access-date=June 25, 2021}}</ref> | |||
| {{USRaceRating|Safe|D}} | |||
| November 2, 2006 | |||
|- | |||
| align="left" | ]<ref>{{cite web | title=Election 2006 | url=https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/writeup/election_2006-21.html| publisher=Real Clear Politics | access-date=June 25, 2021}}</ref> | |||
| {{USRaceRating|Likely|D}} | |||
| November 6, 2006 | |||
|} | |} | ||
===Polling=== | |||
] ] courts voters tailgating before a football game between Pennsylvania's two football teams, the ] and the ].<ref name=Ritter />]] | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" | |||
In July 2005, a Zogby Poll showed Rendell with only a 47% to 41% lead over Lynn Swann. Some speculated that controversy over Act 72, proposed Medicaid cuts, and possibly even a ] that was signed into law had reduced the Governor’s popularity.{{Citation needed|date=February 2007}} Also, when compared to other polls, the six percent lead was an outlier{{Citation needed|date=March 2010}}. Rendell has led in other recent polls by significantly higher margins. | |||
|- bgcolor="lightgrey" | |||
! width="200px" | Poll source | |||
Following that poll, Rendell’s supporters pointed out that he has raised more money than his opponents{{Citation needed|date=March 2010}}, which they felt would help him spread his message{{Citation needed|date=March 2010}}. They also pointed out that no Pennsylvania governor had lost re-election since the 1950s, and that, as a sitting governor, Rendell had all of the traditional advantages of an incumbent.<ref></ref><ref>]) Center for Politics & Public Affairs]</ref> | |||
! width="150px" | Date(s) administered | |||
! width="100px" | Ed<br />Rendell (D) | |||
Swann hoped to perform strongly in the conservative "T" section of the state (the central and northern regions) and in his native ] area{{Citation needed|date=March 2010}}. On 7 February 2006 Swann served as master of ceremonies for the ] ] victory parade before 250,000 people.<ref></ref> ] canvassed for votes among ] voters in ] before the ] game against the ].<ref name=Ritter>{{cite news | |||
! width="100px" | Lynn<br />Swann (R) | |||
| last = Ritter | |||
| first = Kara | |||
| coauthors = | |||
| title = Ex-Steeler looks to sway support of Eagles' fans | |||
| work = ] | |||
| pages = | |||
| language = | |||
| publisher = | |||
| date = 2006-08 | |||
| url = http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_kmtpi/is_200608/ai_n16967992 | |||
| accessdate = }}</ref> | |||
At the time, Rendell had relatively low approval ratings outside of his native Southeastern Pennsylvania. Polls in early February showed Swann and Rendell in a statistical tie.<ref></ref> <!-- Polls and approval ratings don't measure the same thing, so these two statements aren't contradictory. Maybe there is a better way to put this.--> | |||
However, Swann's momentum did not survive an effective barrage of advertising from ] in early spring and had trouble keeping up with Rendell's effective fundraising.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06312/736519-178.stm | work=Pittsburgh Post-Gazette | title=Rendell cruises to 2nd term as governor | first1=Tom | last1=Barnes | first2=Dennis B. | last2=Roddy | date=November 8, 2006}}</ref> Swann's focus on "reforming" Harrisburg never caught traction, possibly as a result of his vocal support for ] and ], two legislative leaders who were defeated in the May 2006 primary election.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/18/us/18repubs.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=Brightbill&st=nyt&oref=slogin | work=The New York Times | title=G.O.P. Conservatives Topple Veteran State Lawmakers in Pennsylvania | first=Jason | last=Deparle | date=May 18, 2006 | accessdate=May 22, 2010}}</ref> | |||
==Polling== | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- bgcolor=lightgrey | |||
! width="200px" | Source | |||
! width="125px" | Date | |||
! width="100px" | Rendell (D) | |||
! width="100px" | Swann (R) | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]/]<ref></ref> | ||
| September 24, 2006 | | September 24, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''60%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''60%''' | ||
| 33% | | 33% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| September 22, 2006 | | September 22, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''56%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''56%''' | ||
| 36% | | 36% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]/]<ref name="Zogby/WSJ"></ref> | ||
| September 11, 2006 | | September 11, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''51.6%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''51.6%''' | ||
| 42.1% | | 42.1% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="left" |]/]<ref name="Zogby/WSJ"/> | |||
| | |||
| August 28, 2006 | | August 28, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''48.4%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''48.4%''' | ||
| 43.5% | | 43.5% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| August 25, 2006 | | August 25, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''50%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''50%''' | ||
| 38% | | 38% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| August 17, 2006 | | August 17, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''51%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''51%''' | ||
| 41% | | 41% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| August 16, 2006 | | August 16, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''57%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''57%''' | ||
| 38% | | 38% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| July 26, 2006 | | July 26, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''50%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''50%''' | ||
| 40% | | 40% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="left" |]/]<ref name="Zogby/WSJ"/> | |||
| | |||
| July 24, 2006 | | July 24, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''47.5%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''47.5%''' | ||
| 41.1% | | 41.1% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| July 20, 2006 | | July 20, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''49%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''49%''' | ||
| 36% | | 36% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| June 26, 2006 | | June 26, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''50%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''50%''' | ||
| 36% | | 36% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| June 22, 2006 | | June 22, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''55%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''55%''' | ||
| 31% | | 31% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="left" |]/]<ref name="Zogby/WSJ"/> | |||
| | |||
| June 21, 2006 | | June 21, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''47.7%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''47.7%''' | ||
| 43.4% | | 43.4% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| June 15, 2006 | | June 15, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''49%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''49%''' | ||
| 38% | | 38% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| May 25, 2006 | | May 25, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''52%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''52%''' | ||
| 34% | | 34% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| May 12, 2006 | | May 12, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''55%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''55%''' | ||
| 33% | | 33% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| May 10, 2006 | | May 10, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''49%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''49%''' | ||
| 41% | | 41% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| May 3, 2006 | | May 3, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''49%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''49%''' | ||
| 35% | | 35% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| April 29, 2006 | | April 29, 2006 | ||
| 41% | | 41% | ||
| {{party shading/Republican}} | '''44%''' | | {{party shading/Republican}} | '''44%''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]/]<ref></ref> | ||
| April 17–26, 2006 | | April 17–26, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''30%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''30%''' | ||
| 29% | | 29% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| April 17–24, 2006 | | April 17–24, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''45%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''45%''' | ||
| 39% | | 39% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| April 13, 2006 | | April 13, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''44%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''44%''' | ||
| 42% | | 42% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| April 5, 2006 | | April 5, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''47%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''47%''' | ||
| 37% | | 37% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]/]<ref></ref> | ||
| March 30, 2006 | | March 30, 2006 | ||
| 29% | | 29% | ||
| {{party shading/Republican}} | '''35%''' | | {{party shading/Republican}} | '''35%''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| March 28, 2006 | | March 28, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''44%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''44%''' | ||
| 41% | | 41% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| March 15, 2006 | | March 15, 2006 | ||
| '''44%''' | | '''44%''' | ||
| '''44%''' | | '''44%''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref> {{dead link|date=May 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> | ||
| March 4, 2006 | | March 4, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''46%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''46%''' | ||
| 43% | | 43% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| |
| February 21, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''46%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''46%''' | ||
| 43% | | 43% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| |
| February 15, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''48%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''48%''' | ||
| 36% | | 36% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| |
| February 9, 2006 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''45%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''45%''' | ||
| 42% | | 42% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| |
| January 25, 2006 | ||
| 44% | | 44% | ||
| {{party shading/Republican}} | '''46%''' | | {{party shading/Republican}} | '''46%''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| |
| January 19, 2006 | ||
| 43% | | 43% | ||
| {{party shading/Republican}} | '''45%''' | | {{party shading/Republican}} | '''45%''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| |
| December 21, 2005 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''45%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''45%''' | ||
| 41% | | 41% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| |
| December 13, 2005 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''48%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''48%''' | ||
| 35% | | 35% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| |
| November 16, 2005 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''45%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''45%''' | ||
| 42% | | 42% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| |
| November 7, 2005 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''50%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''50%''' | ||
| 36% | | 36% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| |
| October 19, 2005 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''46%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''46%''' | ||
| 41% | | 41% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref name="Keystone Poll"></ref> | ||
| September |
| September 2005 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''53%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''53%''' | ||
| 33% | | 33% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| |
| September 12, 2005 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''48%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''48%''' | ||
| 43% | | 43% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | align="left" |]<ref></ref> | ||
| |
| August 2, 2005 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''47%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''47%''' | ||
| 41% | | 41% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Rasmussen | | align="left" | Rasmussen | ||
| July 20, 2005 | | July 20, 2005 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''47%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''47%''' | ||
| 41% | | 41% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |
| align="left" |]<ref name="Keystone Poll"/> | ||
| June 2005 | | June 2005 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''42%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''42%''' | ||
| 32% | | 32% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |
| align="left" |]<ref name="Keystone Poll"/> | ||
| March 2005 | | March 2005 | ||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''59%''' | | {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''59%''' | ||
Line 338: | Line 365: | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Results== | ===Results=== | ||
{{Election box begin no change | {{Election box begin no change | ||
|title = Pennsylvania gubernatorial election, 2006<ref>''The Pennsylvania Manual'', p. 7-18.</ref><ref>''The Pennsylvania Manual, p. 7-84.</ref> | |title = Pennsylvania gubernatorial election, 2006<ref>''The Pennsylvania Manual'', p. 7-18.</ref><ref>''The Pennsylvania Manual'', p. 7-84.</ref> | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Election box candidate with party link no change | {{Election box winning candidate with party link no change | ||
|party = Democratic Party (United States) | |party = Democratic Party (United States) | ||
|candidate = |
|candidate = ] (incumbent) | ||
|votes = 2,470,517 | |votes = 2,470,517 | ||
|percentage = 60.33 | |percentage = 60.33 | ||
Line 354: | Line 381: | ||
|percentage = 39.61 | |percentage = 39.61 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Election box |
{{Election box write-in with party link no change|votes=2,670|percentage=0.06}} | ||
|party = Write-in candidate | |||
|candidate = — | |||
|votes = 2,670 | |||
|percentage = 0.06 | |||
}} | |||
{{Election box total no change | {{Election box total no change | ||
|votes = 4, |
|votes = 4,095,322 | ||
|percentage = 100.00 | |percentage = 100.00 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Election box turnout no change | {{Election box turnout no change | ||
|percentage = 50.05 | |percentage = 50.05 | ||
}} | |||
{{Election box hold with party link no swing | |||
| winner = Democratic Party (United States) | |||
| loser = | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Election box end}} | {{Election box end}} | ||
===Results by county=== | |||
{| width="60%" class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center" | |||
|- | |||
! style="text-align:center;" rowspan="2"| County<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.electionreturns.pa.gov/General/CountyBreakDownResults?officeId=3&districtId=1&ElectionID=15&ElectionType=G&IsActive=0&isRetention=0|title=2006 General Election (Official Returns)|work=Commonwealth of Pennsylvania|access-date=1 January 2025}}</ref> | |||
! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Ed Rendell<br />Democratic | |||
! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Lynn Swann<br />Republican | |||
! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Margin | |||
! style="text-align:center;" rowspan="2"| Total votes cast | |||
|- | |||
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| # | |||
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| % | |||
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| # | |||
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| % | |||
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| # | |||
! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| % | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 13,034 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 43.28% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 17,084 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 56.72% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -4,050 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -13.44% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 30,118 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 275,227 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 59.92% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 184,063 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 40.08% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 91,164 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 19.84% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 459,290 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 9,552 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 41.27% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 13,595 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 58.73% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -4,403 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -17.46% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 23,147 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 35,510 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 54.99% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 29,069 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 45.01% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 6,441 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 9.98% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 64,579 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 6,372 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 38.29% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 10,270 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 61.71% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -3,898 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -23.42% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 16,642 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 66,837 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 57.16% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 50,096 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 42.84% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 16,741 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 14.32% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 116,933 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 15,435 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 39.85% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 23,295 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 60.15% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -7,860 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -20.30% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 54,809 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 8,485 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 44.30% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 10,670 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 55.70% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -2,185 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -11.40% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 19,155 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 163,739 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 70.11% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 69,798 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 29.89% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 93,941 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 40.21% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 233,537 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 24,936 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 39.24% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 38,613 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 60.76% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -13,677 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -21.52% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 63,549 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 31,856 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 60.84% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 20,506 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 39.16% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 11,350 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 21.68% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 52,362 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 793 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 44.50% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 989 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 55.50% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -196 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -11.00% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 1,782 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 10,633 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 60.59% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 6,917 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 39.41% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 3,176 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 21.18% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 17,550 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 23,415 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 53.87% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 20,051 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 46.13% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 3,364 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 7.74% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 43,466 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 112,960 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 65.15% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 60,437 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 34.85% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 52,523 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 30.30% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 173,397 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,451 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 42.07% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 7,505 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 57.93% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -2,054 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -15.86% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 12,956 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 12,938 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 50.21% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 12,830 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 49.79% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 108 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 0.42% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 25,768 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,464 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 55.73% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 4,341 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 44.27% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1,123 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 11.46% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 9,805 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 9,281 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 50.55% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 9,078 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 49.45% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 203 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1.10% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 18,359 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 11,695 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 41.92% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 16,202 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 58.08% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -4,507 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -16.16% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 27,897 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 32,737 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 41.48% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 46,189 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 58.52% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -13,452 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -17.04% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 78,926 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 39,711 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 45.64% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 47,294 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 54.36% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -7,853 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -9.28% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 87,005 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 154,249 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 73.93% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 54,043 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 26.07% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 99,846 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 47.86% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 208,652 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 6,907 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 60.56% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 4,499 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 39.44% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 2,408 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 21.12% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 11,406 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 50,042 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 58.12% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 36,059 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 41.88% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 13,983 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 16.24% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 86,101 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 22,603 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 59.33% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 15,492 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 40.67% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 7,111 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 18.66% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 38,095 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 929 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 46.73% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 1,059 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 53.27% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -130 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -7.46% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 1,988 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 16,945 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 39.42% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 26,043 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 60.58% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -9,098 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -21.16% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 42,988 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1,670 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 38.49% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 2,669 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 61.51% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -999 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -23.02% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 4,339 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 7,055 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 55.44% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 5,670 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 44.56% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1,385 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 10.88% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 12,725 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,490 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 40.39% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 8,103 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 59.61% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -2,613 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -19.22% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 13,593 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 12,953 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 49.17% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 13,390 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 50.83% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -437 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -1.67% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 26,343 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,402 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 38.11% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 8,774 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 61.89% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -3,372 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -23.78% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 14,176 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 2,748 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 35.49% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 4,995 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 64.51% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -2,247 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -29.02% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 7,743 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 56,966 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 72.98% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 21,905 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 27.02% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 35,871 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 45.96% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 78,061 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 62,934 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 41.79% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 87,668 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 58.21% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -24,734 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -16.42% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 150,602 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 17,557 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 55.06% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 14,329 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 44.94% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 3,228 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 10.12% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 31,886 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 16,813 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 42.47% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 22,775 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 57.53% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -5,962 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -15.06% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 39,588 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 59,338 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 63.11% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 34,692 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 36.89% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 24,646 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 26.22% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 94,030 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 64,628 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 67.55% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 31,051 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 32.45% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 33,577 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 35.10% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 95,679 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 14,777 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 41.17% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 21,116 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 58.83% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -6,339 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -17.66% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 35,893 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,044 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 46.13% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 5,890 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 53.87% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -846 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -7.74% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 10,934 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 19,888 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 52.17% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 18,237 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 47.83% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1,651 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 4.34% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 38,125 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 4,730 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 38.23% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 7,642 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 61.77% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -2,912 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -23.54% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 12,372 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 21,430 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 60.36% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 14,071 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 39.64% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 7,359 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 20.72% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 35,501 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 211,651 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 71.66% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 83,718 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 28.34% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 127,933 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 43.32% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 295,369 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 2,764 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 47.47% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 3,059 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 52.53% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -295 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -5.06% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 5,823 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 53,007 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 63.80% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 30,081 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 36.20% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 22,926 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 27.60% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 83,088 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 13,470 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 50.62% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 13,140 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 49.38% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 330 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1.24% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 26,610 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 4,477 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 30.93% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 9,998 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 69.07% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -5,521 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -38.14% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 14,475 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 383,339 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 89.39% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 45,502 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 10.61% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 337,837 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 78.78% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 428,841 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 7,393 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 53.02% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 6,551 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 46.98% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 842 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 6.04% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 13,944 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 2,035 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 36.78% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 3,498 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 63.22% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -1,463 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -26.44% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 5,533 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 26,327 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 55.76% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 20,886 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 44.24% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,441 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 11.52% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 47,213 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 4,073 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 36.12% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 7,203 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 63.88% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -3,130 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -27.76% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 11,276 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 12,499 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 45.41% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 15,028 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 54.59% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -2,529 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -14.18% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 27,527 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1,264 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 49.78% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 1,275 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 50.22% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -11 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -0.44% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 2,539 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 8,239 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 54.52% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 6,874 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 45.48% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1,365 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 9.04% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 15,113 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,126 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 41.02% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 7,370 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 58.98% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -2,244 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -17.96% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 12,496 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,006 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 43.50% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 6,503 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 56.50% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -1,497 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -13.00% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 11,509 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 7,906 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 44.80% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 9,742 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 55.20% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -1,836 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -10.40% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 17,648 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 7,278 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 55.46% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 5,846 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 44.54% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1,432 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 10.92% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 13,124 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 38,422 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 52.73% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 34,440 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 47.27% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 3,982 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5.46% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 72,862 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 8,143 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 51.61% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 7,635 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 48.38% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 508 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 3.23% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 15,778 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 60,145 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 46.27% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 69,854 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 53.73% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -9,709 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -7.46% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 129,999 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,518 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 53.87% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 4,726 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 46.13% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 792 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 7.74% | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 10,244 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| ] | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 55,276 | |||
| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 43.92% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 70,592 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 56.08% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -15,316 | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| -12.16% | |||
| {{party shading/Republican}}| 125,868 | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
!Totals!!2,470,517!!60.36%!!1,622,135!!39.64%!!848,382!!20.72%!!4,092,652 | |||
|} | |||
====Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic==== | |||
* ] (largest municipality: ]) | |||
* ] (Largest city: ]) | |||
* ] (Largest city: ]) | |||
* ] (Largest city: ]) | |||
* ] (largest municipality: ]) | |||
* ] (largest municipality: ]) | |||
* ] (largest municipality: ]) | |||
* ] (largest borough: ]) | |||
* ] (largest borough: ]) | |||
* ] (largest municipality: ]) | |||
* ] (largest municipality: ]) | |||
* ] (largest municipality: ]) | |||
* ] (largest municipality: ]) | |||
* ] (Largest city: ]) | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | *] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
==External links== | |||
'''Campaign websites (Archived)''' | |||
* | |||
* | |||
==Sources== | ==Sources== | ||
* {{Cite book |editor-last=Trostle |editor-first=Sharon |title=] |year=2007 |volume=118 |publisher=] |location=Harrisburg |isbn=0-8182-0318- |
* {{Cite book |editor-last=Trostle |editor-first=Sharon |title=] |year=2007 |volume=118 |publisher=] |location=Harrisburg |isbn=978-0-8182-0318-3}} | ||
{{2006 U.S. midterm elections}} | {{2006 U.S. midterm elections}} | ||
Line 384: | Line 1,053: | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Pennsylvania Gubernatorial Election, 2006}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Pennsylvania Gubernatorial Election, 2006}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 13:13, 2 January 2025
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
County results Congressional district results Precinct resultsRendell: 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% >90% Swann: 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% >90% Tie: 50% No data | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The 2006 Pennsylvania gubernatorial election was held on November 7, 2006, and included the races for the governor of Pennsylvania and lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania. Incumbent Democratic governor Ed Rendell successfully ran for re-election. Pennsylvania's first female lieutenant governor, Catherine Baker Knoll, was also running for re-election.
As of 2025, this is the most recent gubernatorial election in which the Democratic candidate has carried the following counties- Clearfield, Columbia, Elk, Mercer, Pike, Susquehanna, Warren, Washington, Wayne and Wyoming. This is the last time any statewide race in Pennsylvania resulted in a candidate getting over 60% of the vote.
Background
Rendell and Knoll had the advantage of incumbency, important in the swing state of Pennsylvania. Rendell's approval rating as of May 2006 was 62%.
In the 2000 Presidential election, then Vice President Al Gore won the state 50.6%-46.4% over then Texas Governor George W. Bush. In 2004, Senator John Kerry carried the state 50.9%-48.4% over incumbent president Bush.
Although the state had voted Democratic in eight of the past 12 presidential elections, its Congressional delegation had been majority Republican for years. The counties of Philadelphia and Allegheny were the Democratic strongholds, while the central part of the state was where the Republican Party fared best. The 2005 statewide party registration had Democrats out-numbering Republicans in the state with 3,841,429 to 3,292,656, with 939,252 registered independent voters.
Democratic primary
Michael Morrill, the Green Party's nominee for governor in 2002, considered challenging Rendell on a progressive liberal platform. On February 13, 2006, Morrill however stated that he would not run, citing the toll his 2002 race took on his family. Rendell thus ran unopposed.
Results
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | Ed Rendell (incumbent) | Unopposed | |||
Total votes | 654,985 | 100.00 |
Republican primary
Candidates
Declared
- Lynn Swann, Pittsburgh Steelers Hall-of Fame wide receiver and chairman of the President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports
Withdrew
- Jim Panyard, former president of the Pennsylvania Manufacturers Association
- Jeff Piccola, Majority Whip of the Pennsylvania State Senate from Susquehanna Township
- William Scranton III, former lieutenant governor and the 1986 nominee
Declined
- Jane Earll, state senator from Erie County and nominee for lieutenant governor in 2002
- Pat Toomey, former U.S. representative from Allentown and candidate for U.S. Senate in 2004
- Mark Schweiker, former governor
- Melissa Hart, U.S. representative from Pittsburgh (ran for re-election)
- Rick Santorum, U.S. senator (ran for re-election)
- Bruce Castor, District Attorney of Montgomery County and candidate for attorney general in 2004
Campaign
Lynn Swann, Jeff Piccola, Jim Panyard and Bill Scranton III all announced their intention to run in the Republican primary for governor in 2006. Scranton, who served two terms as Lieutenant Governor of Pennsylvania, was the son of popular former governor William Scranton, and a member of the wealthy Scranton family was the early front-runner. However, a series of blunders by his campaign, and a lack of momentum from the Piccola and Panyard campaigns moved Swann into presumptive nominee status. The state Republican party then endorsed Swann, leading the three other candidates to drop out ahead of the March deadline to file for the primary.
Results
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Lynn Swann | Unopposed | |||
Total votes | 583,658 | 100.00 |
General election
Candidates
- Ed Rendell, incumbent governor of Pennsylvania (Democratic)
- Lynn Swann, former Pittsburgh Steelers Hall of Fame wide receiver and chairman of the President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports (Republican)
- Running mate: Jim Matthews, Montgomery County Commissioner and brother of Chris Matthews
Withdrew
- Marakay Rogers, attorney and 2004 Attorney General nominee (Green)
Failed to submit signatures
- Hagan Smith, building contractor and chair of Butler County Constitution Party (Constitution)
- Russ Diamond, 2005 General Assembly pay raise whistleblower (Independent)
- Running mate: Tom Lingenfelter, former Republican state committeeman and perennial candidate
Four candidates were campaigning for governor, but only two went on to appear on the ballot in November. Constitution candidate Hagan Smith and Independent candidate Russ Diamond were unable to secure the necessary signatures to appear on the ballot. On August 11, Green Party candidate Marakay Rogers withdrew her nominating papers, following a challenge by Pennsylvania Democrats, who alleged more than 69,000 signatures on the petitions were fake names, unregistered voters or illegible. The challenge followed a Republican drive to collect signatures to put Green candidate Carl Romanelli on the ballot in the Senate race.
Rogers continued to campaign, hopeful that a federal appeals court would rule favorably in a lawsuit seeking to overturn the state's signature requirement for third-party candidates.
Analysis
In July 2005, a Zogby Poll showed Rendell with only a 47% to 41% lead over Lynn Swann. Some speculated that controversy over Act 72, proposed Medicaid cuts, and possibly even a legislative pay increase that was signed into law had reduced the Governor's popularity. Rendell led in other recent polls by significantly higher margins. Following that poll, Rendell's supporters pointed out that he has raised more money than his opponents, which they felt would help him spread his message. They also pointed out that as a sitting governor, Rendell had all of the traditional advantages of an incumbent.
Swann hoped to perform strongly in the conservative "T" section of the state (the central and northern regions) and in his native western Pennsylvania area. Swann canvassed for votes among tailgating voters in Philadelphia before the Steelers game against the Eagles. On February 7, Swann served as master of ceremonies for the Pittsburgh Steelers's Super Bowl XL victory parade before 250,000 people. Polls in early February showed Swann and Rendell in a statistical tie. However, Swann's momentum did not survive an effective barrage of advertising from Rendell in early spring and had trouble keeping up with Rendell's effective fundraising. Swann's focus on reform never caught traction, possibly as a result of his vocal support for Chip Brightbill and Robert Jubelirer, two legislative leaders who were defeated in the May 2006 primary election.
Predictions
Source | Ranking | As of |
---|---|---|
The Cook Political Report | Solid D | November 6, 2006 |
Sabato's Crystal Ball | Likely D | November 6, 2006 |
Rothenberg Political Report | Safe D | November 2, 2006 |
Real Clear Politics | Likely D | November 6, 2006 |
Polling
Poll source | Date(s) administered | Ed Rendell (D) |
Lynn Swann (R) |
---|---|---|---|
Temple/Inquirer Poll | September 24, 2006 | 60% | 33% |
Rasmussen | September 22, 2006 | 56% | 36% |
Zogby/WSJ | September 11, 2006 | 51.6% | 42.1% |
Zogby/WSJ | August 28, 2006 | 48.4% | 43.5% |
Rasmussen | August 25, 2006 | 50% | 38% |
Strategic Vision | August 17, 2006 | 51% | 41% |
Quinnipiac | August 16, 2006 | 57% | 38% |
Rasmussen | July 26, 2006 | 50% | 40% |
Zogby/WSJ | July 24, 2006 | 47.5% | 41.1% |
Strategic Vision | July 20, 2006 | 49% | 36% |
Rasmussen | June 26, 2006 | 50% | 36% |
Quinnipiac | June 22, 2006 | 55% | 31% |
Zogby/WSJ | June 21, 2006 | 47.7% | 43.4% |
Strategic Vision | June 15, 2006 | 49% | 38% |
Rasmussen | May 25, 2006 | 52% | 34% |
Quinnipiac | May 12, 2006 | 55% | 33% |
Strategic Vision | May 10, 2006 | 49% | 41% |
Keystone Poll | May 3, 2006 | 49% | 35% |
Rasmussen | April 29, 2006 | 41% | 44% |
IssuesPA/Pew Poll | April 17–26, 2006 | 30% | 29% |
Muhlenberg | April 17–24, 2006 | 45% | 39% |
Strategic Vision | April 13, 2006 | 44% | 42% |
Quinnipiac | April 5, 2006 | 47% | 37% |
IssuesPA/Pew Poll | March 30, 2006 | 29% | 35% |
Rasmussen | March 28, 2006 | 44% | 41% |
Strategic Vision | March 15, 2006 | 44% | 44% |
Muhlenberg | March 4, 2006 | 46% | 43% |
Rasmussen | February 21, 2006 | 46% | 43% |
Quinnipiac | February 15, 2006 | 48% | 36% |
Keystone Poll | February 9, 2006 | 45% | 42% |
Strategic Vision | January 25, 2006 | 44% | 46% |
Rasmussen | January 19, 2006 | 43% | 45% |
Strategic Vision | December 21, 2005 | 45% | 41% |
Quinnipiac | December 13, 2005 | 48% | 35% |
Strategic Vision | November 16, 2005 | 45% | 42% |
Rasmussen | November 7, 2005 | 50% | 36% |
Strategic Vision | October 19, 2005 | 46% | 41% |
Keystone Poll | September 2005 | 53% | 33% |
Strategic Vision | September 12, 2005 | 48% | 43% |
Strategic Vision | August 2, 2005 | 47% | 41% |
Rasmussen | July 20, 2005 | 47% | 41% |
Keystone Poll | June 2005 | 42% | 32% |
Keystone Poll | March 2005 | 59% | 29% |
Results
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | Ed Rendell (incumbent) | 2,470,517 | 60.33 | ||
Republican | Lynn Swann | 1,622,135 | 39.61 | ||
Write-in | 2,670 | 0.06 | |||
Total votes | 4,095,322 | 100.00 | |||
Turnout | 50.05 | ||||
Democratic hold |
Results by county
County | Ed Rendell Democratic |
Lynn Swann Republican |
Margin | Total votes cast | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | % | # | % | # | % | ||
Adams | 13,034 | 43.28% | 17,084 | 56.72% | -4,050 | -13.44% | 30,118 |
Allegheny | 275,227 | 59.92% | 184,063 | 40.08% | 91,164 | 19.84% | 459,290 |
Armstrong | 9,552 | 41.27% | 13,595 | 58.73% | -4,403 | -17.46% | 23,147 |
Beaver | 35,510 | 54.99% | 29,069 | 45.01% | 6,441 | 9.98% | 64,579 |
Bedford | 6,372 | 38.29% | 10,270 | 61.71% | -3,898 | -23.42% | 16,642 |
Berks | 66,837 | 57.16% | 50,096 | 42.84% | 16,741 | 14.32% | 116,933 |
Blair | 15,435 | 39.85% | 23,295 | 60.15% | -7,860 | -20.30% | 54,809 |
Bradford | 8,485 | 44.30% | 10,670 | 55.70% | -2,185 | -11.40% | 19,155 |
Bucks | 163,739 | 70.11% | 69,798 | 29.89% | 93,941 | 40.21% | 233,537 |
Butler | 24,936 | 39.24% | 38,613 | 60.76% | -13,677 | -21.52% | 63,549 |
Cambria | 31,856 | 60.84% | 20,506 | 39.16% | 11,350 | 21.68% | 52,362 |
Cameron | 793 | 44.50% | 989 | 55.50% | -196 | -11.00% | 1,782 |
Carbon | 10,633 | 60.59% | 6,917 | 39.41% | 3,176 | 21.18% | 17,550 |
Centre | 23,415 | 53.87% | 20,051 | 46.13% | 3,364 | 7.74% | 43,466 |
Chester | 112,960 | 65.15% | 60,437 | 34.85% | 52,523 | 30.30% | 173,397 |
Clarion | 5,451 | 42.07% | 7,505 | 57.93% | -2,054 | -15.86% | 12,956 |
Clearfield | 12,938 | 50.21% | 12,830 | 49.79% | 108 | 0.42% | 25,768 |
Clinton | 5,464 | 55.73% | 4,341 | 44.27% | 1,123 | 11.46% | 9,805 |
Columbia | 9,281 | 50.55% | 9,078 | 49.45% | 203 | 1.10% | 18,359 |
Crawford | 11,695 | 41.92% | 16,202 | 58.08% | -4,507 | -16.16% | 27,897 |
Cumberland | 32,737 | 41.48% | 46,189 | 58.52% | -13,452 | -17.04% | 78,926 |
Dauphin | 39,711 | 45.64% | 47,294 | 54.36% | -7,853 | -9.28% | 87,005 |
Delaware | 154,249 | 73.93% | 54,043 | 26.07% | 99,846 | 47.86% | 208,652 |
Elk | 6,907 | 60.56% | 4,499 | 39.44% | 2,408 | 21.12% | 11,406 |
Erie | 50,042 | 58.12% | 36,059 | 41.88% | 13,983 | 16.24% | 86,101 |
Fayette | 22,603 | 59.33% | 15,492 | 40.67% | 7,111 | 18.66% | 38,095 |
Forest | 929 | 46.73% | 1,059 | 53.27% | -130 | -7.46% | 1,988 |
Franklin | 16,945 | 39.42% | 26,043 | 60.58% | -9,098 | -21.16% | 42,988 |
Fulton | 1,670 | 38.49% | 2,669 | 61.51% | -999 | -23.02% | 4,339 |
Greene | 7,055 | 55.44% | 5,670 | 44.56% | 1,385 | 10.88% | 12,725 |
Huntingdon | 5,490 | 40.39% | 8,103 | 59.61% | -2,613 | -19.22% | 13,593 |
Indiana | 12,953 | 49.17% | 13,390 | 50.83% | -437 | -1.67% | 26,343 |
Jefferson | 5,402 | 38.11% | 8,774 | 61.89% | -3,372 | -23.78% | 14,176 |
Juniata | 2,748 | 35.49% | 4,995 | 64.51% | -2,247 | -29.02% | 7,743 |
Lackawanna | 56,966 | 72.98% | 21,905 | 27.02% | 35,871 | 45.96% | 78,061 |
Lancaster | 62,934 | 41.79% | 87,668 | 58.21% | -24,734 | -16.42% | 150,602 |
Lawrence | 17,557 | 55.06% | 14,329 | 44.94% | 3,228 | 10.12% | 31,886 |
Lebanon | 16,813 | 42.47% | 22,775 | 57.53% | -5,962 | -15.06% | 39,588 |
Lehigh | 59,338 | 63.11% | 34,692 | 36.89% | 24,646 | 26.22% | 94,030 |
Luzerne | 64,628 | 67.55% | 31,051 | 32.45% | 33,577 | 35.10% | 95,679 |
Lycoming | 14,777 | 41.17% | 21,116 | 58.83% | -6,339 | -17.66% | 35,893 |
McKean | 5,044 | 46.13% | 5,890 | 53.87% | -846 | -7.74% | 10,934 |
Mercer | 19,888 | 52.17% | 18,237 | 47.83% | 1,651 | 4.34% | 38,125 |
Mifflin | 4,730 | 38.23% | 7,642 | 61.77% | -2,912 | -23.54% | 12,372 |
Monroe | 21,430 | 60.36% | 14,071 | 39.64% | 7,359 | 20.72% | 35,501 |
Montgomery | 211,651 | 71.66% | 83,718 | 28.34% | 127,933 | 43.32% | 295,369 |
Montour | 2,764 | 47.47% | 3,059 | 52.53% | -295 | -5.06% | 5,823 |
Northampton | 53,007 | 63.80% | 30,081 | 36.20% | 22,926 | 27.60% | 83,088 |
Northumberland | 13,470 | 50.62% | 13,140 | 49.38% | 330 | 1.24% | 26,610 |
Perry | 4,477 | 30.93% | 9,998 | 69.07% | -5,521 | -38.14% | 14,475 |
Philadelphia | 383,339 | 89.39% | 45,502 | 10.61% | 337,837 | 78.78% | 428,841 |
Pike | 7,393 | 53.02% | 6,551 | 46.98% | 842 | 6.04% | 13,944 |
Potter | 2,035 | 36.78% | 3,498 | 63.22% | -1,463 | -26.44% | 5,533 |
Schuylkill | 26,327 | 55.76% | 20,886 | 44.24% | 5,441 | 11.52% | 47,213 |
Snyder | 4,073 | 36.12% | 7,203 | 63.88% | -3,130 | -27.76% | 11,276 |
Somerset | 12,499 | 45.41% | 15,028 | 54.59% | -2,529 | -14.18% | 27,527 |
Sullivan | 1,264 | 49.78% | 1,275 | 50.22% | -11 | -0.44% | 2,539 |
Susquehanna | 8,239 | 54.52% | 6,874 | 45.48% | 1,365 | 9.04% | 15,113 |
Tioga | 5,126 | 41.02% | 7,370 | 58.98% | -2,244 | -17.96% | 12,496 |
Union | 5,006 | 43.50% | 6,503 | 56.50% | -1,497 | -13.00% | 11,509 |
Venango | 7,906 | 44.80% | 9,742 | 55.20% | -1,836 | -10.40% | 17,648 |
Warren | 7,278 | 55.46% | 5,846 | 44.54% | 1,432 | 10.92% | 13,124 |
Washington | 38,422 | 52.73% | 34,440 | 47.27% | 3,982 | 5.46% | 72,862 |
Wayne | 8,143 | 51.61% | 7,635 | 48.38% | 508 | 3.23% | 15,778 |
Westmoreland | 60,145 | 46.27% | 69,854 | 53.73% | -9,709 | -7.46% | 129,999 |
Wyoming | 5,518 | 53.87% | 4,726 | 46.13% | 792 | 7.74% | 10,244 |
York | 55,276 | 43.92% | 70,592 | 56.08% | -15,316 | -12.16% | 125,868 |
Totals | 2,470,517 | 60.36% | 1,622,135 | 39.64% | 848,382 | 20.72% | 4,092,652 |
Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic
- Cambria (largest municipality: Johnstown)
- Clinton (Largest city: Lock Haven)
- Clearfield (Largest city: DuBois)
- Elk (Largest city: St. Marys)
- Mercer (largest municipality: Hermitage)
- Centre (largest municipality: State College)
- Erie (largest municipality: Erie)
- Monroe (largest borough: Stroudsburg)
- Northumberland (largest borough: Sunbury)
- Pike (largest municipality: Matamoras)
- Susquehanna (largest municipality: Forest City)
- Wayne (largest municipality: Honesdale)
- Wyoming (largest municipality: Tunkhannock)
- Warren (Largest city: Warren)
See also
- 2006 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania
- 2006 United States gubernatorial elections
- 2005 Pennsylvania General Assembly pay raise controversy
References
- Survey USA
- 2005 Municipal Election
- "Morrill Majority". Archived from the original on May 10, 2017. Retrieved June 10, 2021.
- Morrill release Archived 2006-03-22 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "GOP Shortlist for Governor". PoliticsPA. The Publius Group. 2002. Archived from the original on November 8, 2002.
- "Inquirer.com: Philadelphia local news, sports, jobs, cars, homes". Archived from the original on November 20, 2015.
- "Lynn Swann Goes Deep".
- Ed Rendell's Campaign Website
- Lynn Swann's Campaign Website
- Green Party
- Hagan For Governor site Archived 2006-01-29 at the Wayback Machine
- "Russ Diamond's Campaign Website". Archived from the original on July 15, 2016. Retrieved December 1, 2018.
- Politics1: Pennsylvania
- "Green Party candidates give up". Los Angeles Daily News. Archived from the original on September 26, 2011. Retrieved August 15, 2006.
- Green Party candidate withdraws
- Minor parties sue Archived 2007-09-30 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Ritter, Kara (August 2006). "Ex-Steeler looks to sway support of Eagles' fans". The Philadelphia Inquirer.
- Madonna analysis Archived 2005-12-14 at the Wayback Machine
- Franklin & Marshall College (Terry Madonna) Center for Politics & Public Affairs Archived 2005-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
- A quarter-million thanks Archived 2012-09-06 at archive.today Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
- Rendell, Swann in dead heat Archived 2008-04-08 at the Wayback Machine Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
- Barnes, Tom; Roddy, Dennis B. (November 8, 2006). "Rendell cruises to 2nd term as governor". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
- Deparle, Jason (May 18, 2006). "G.O.P. Conservatives Topple Veteran State Lawmakers in Pennsylvania". The New York Times. Retrieved May 22, 2010.
- "2006 Governor Race Ratings for November 6, 2006" (PDF). The Cook Political Report. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 5, 2008. Retrieved October 1, 2006.
- "Election Eve 2006: THE FINAL PREDICTIONS". Sabato's Crystal Ball. November 6, 2006. Retrieved June 25, 2021.
- "2006 Gubernatorial Ratings". Senate Ratings. The Rothenberg Political Report. Retrieved June 25, 2021.
- "Election 2006". Real Clear Politics. Retrieved June 25, 2021.
- Temple/Inquirer Poll
- Rasmussen
- ^ Zogby/WSJ
- Rasmussen
- Strategic Vision
- Quinnipiac
- Rasmussen
- Strategic Vision
- Rasmussen
- Quinnipiac
- Strategic Vision
- Rasmussen
- Quinnipiac
- Strategic Vision
- Keystone Poll
- Rasmussen
- IssuesPA/Pew Poll
- Muhlenberg
- Strategic Vision
- Quinnipiac
- IssuesPA/Pew Poll
- Rasmussen
- Strategic Vision
- Muhlenberg
- Rasmussen
- Quinnipiac
- Keystone Poll
- Strategic Vision
- Rasmussen
- Strategic Vision
- Quinnipiac
- Strategic Vision
- Rasmussen
- Strategic Vision
- ^ Keystone Poll
- Strategic Vision
- Strategic Vision
- The Pennsylvania Manual, p. 7-18.
- The Pennsylvania Manual, p. 7-84.
- "2006 General Election (Official Returns)". Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Retrieved January 1, 2025.
External links
Campaign websites (Archived)
Sources
- Trostle, Sharon, ed. (2007). The Pennsylvania Manual. Vol. 118. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Department of General Services. ISBN 978-0-8182-0318-3.
(2005 ←) 2006 United States elections (→ 2007) | |
---|---|
U.S. Senate |
|
U.S. House (election ratings) |
|
Governors |
|
State Attorneys General | |
State officials | |
State legislatures |
|
Mayors | |
States |
|