Misplaced Pages

Shapiro–Wilk test

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Test of normality in frequentist statistics Not to be confused with the likelihood-ratio test, which is sometimes referred to as Wilks test.

The Shapiro–Wilk test is a test of normality. It was published in 1965 by Samuel Sanford Shapiro and Martin Wilk.

Theory

The Shapiro–Wilk test tests the null hypothesis that a sample x1, ..., xn came from a normally distributed population. The test statistic is

W = ( i = 1 n a i x ( i ) ) 2 i = 1 n ( x i x ¯ ) 2 , {\displaystyle W={\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}a_{i}x_{(i)}\right)^{2} \over \sum _{i=1}^{n}(x_{i}-{\overline {x}})^{2}},}

where

  • x ( i ) {\displaystyle x_{(i)}} with parentheses enclosing the subscript index i is the ith order statistic, i.e., the ith-smallest number in the sample (not to be confused with x i {\displaystyle x_{i}} ).
  • x ¯ = ( x 1 + + x n ) / n {\displaystyle {\overline {x}}=\left(x_{1}+\cdots +x_{n}\right)/n} is the sample mean.

The coefficients a i {\displaystyle a_{i}} are given by:

( a 1 , , a n ) = m T V 1 C , {\displaystyle (a_{1},\dots ,a_{n})={m^{\mathsf {T}}V^{-1} \over C},}

where C is a vector norm:

C = V 1 m = ( m T V 1 V 1 m ) 1 / 2 {\displaystyle C=\|V^{-1}m\|=(m^{\mathsf {T}}V^{-1}V^{-1}m)^{1/2}}

and the vector m,

m = ( m 1 , , m n ) T {\displaystyle m=(m_{1},\dots ,m_{n})^{\mathsf {T}}\,}

is made of the expected values of the order statistics of independent and identically distributed random variables sampled from the standard normal distribution; finally, V {\displaystyle V} is the covariance matrix of those normal order statistics.

There is no name for the distribution of W {\displaystyle W} . The cutoff values for the statistics are calculated through Monte Carlo simulations.

Interpretation

The null-hypothesis of this test is that the population is normally distributed. If the p value is less than the chosen alpha level, then the null hypothesis is rejected and there is evidence that the data tested are not normally distributed.

Like most statistical significance tests, if the sample size is sufficiently large this test may detect even trivial departures from the null hypothesis (i.e., although there may be some statistically significant effect, it may be too small to be of any practical significance); thus, additional investigation of the effect size is typically advisable, e.g., a Q–Q plot in this case.

Power analysis

Monte Carlo simulation has found that Shapiro–Wilk has the best power for a given significance, followed closely by Anderson–Darling when comparing the Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, and Lilliefors.

Approximation

Royston proposed an alternative method of calculating the coefficients vector by providing an algorithm for calculating values that extended the sample size from 50 to 2,000. This technique is used in several software packages including GraphPad Prism, Stata, SPSS and SAS. Rahman and Govidarajulu extended the sample size further up to 5,000.

See also

References

  1. ^ Shapiro, S. S.; Wilk, M. B. (1965). "An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)". Biometrika. 52 (3–4): 591–611. doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591. JSTOR 2333709. MR 0205384. p. 593
  2. ^ Richard M. Dudley (2015). "The Shapiro-Wilk and related tests for normality" (PDF). Retrieved 2022-06-16.
  3. Davis, C. S.; Stephens, M. A. (1978). The covariance matrix of normal order statistics (PDF) (Technical report). Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California. Technical Report No. 14. Retrieved 2022-06-17.
  4. "How do I interpret the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality?". JMP. 2004. Retrieved March 24, 2012.
  5. Field, Andy (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Los Angeles : SAGE Publications. p. 143. ISBN 978-1-84787-906-6.
  6. Razali, Nornadiah; Wah, Yap Bee (2011). "Power comparisons of Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson–Darling tests". Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics. 2 (1): 21–33. Retrieved 30 March 2017.
  7. Royston, Patrick (September 1992). "Approximating the Shapiro–Wilk W-test for non-normality". Statistics and Computing. 2 (3): 117–119. doi:10.1007/BF01891203. S2CID 122446146.
  8. Royston, Patrick. "Shapiro–Wilk and Shapiro–Francia Tests". Stata Technical Bulletin, StataCorp LP. 1 (3).
  9. Shapiro–Wilk and Shapiro–Francia tests for normality
  10. Park, Hun Myoung (2002–2008). "Univariate Analysis and Normality Test Using SAS, Stata, and SPSS". . Retrieved 29 July 2023.
  11. Rahman und Govidarajulu (1997). "A modification of the test of Shapiro and Wilk for normality". Journal of Applied Statistics. 24 (2): 219–236. doi:10.1080/02664769723828.

External links

Statistics
Descriptive statistics
Continuous data
Center
Dispersion
Shape
Count data
Summary tables
Dependence
Graphics
Data collection
Study design
Survey methodology
Controlled experiments
Adaptive designs
Observational studies
Statistical inference
Statistical theory
Frequentist inference
Point estimation
Interval estimation
Testing hypotheses
Parametric tests
Specific tests
Goodness of fit
Rank statistics
Bayesian inference
Correlation
Regression analysis
Linear regression
Non-standard predictors
Generalized linear model
Partition of variance
Categorical / Multivariate / Time-series / Survival analysis
Categorical
Multivariate
Time-series
General
Specific tests
Time domain
Frequency domain
Survival
Survival function
Hazard function
Test
Applications
Biostatistics
Engineering statistics
Social statistics
Spatial statistics
Category: