Misplaced Pages

Einstein problem

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Altenmann (talk | contribs) at 23:02, 5 August 2023 (removed Category:Unsolved problems in geometry using HotCat). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:02, 5 August 2023 by Altenmann (talk | contribs) (removed Category:Unsolved problems in geometry using HotCat)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) This article is about the geometric problem. For the logic puzzle, see Zebra Puzzle. For other uses, see Einstein (disambiguation).

Question about single-shape aperiodic tiling

In plane geometry, the einstein problem asks about the existence of a single prototile that by itself forms an aperiodic set of prototiles; that is, a shape that can tessellate space but only in a nonperiodic way. Such a shape is called an einstein, a word play on ein Stein, German for "one stone". Several variants of the problem, depending on the particular definitions of nonperiodicity and the specifications of what sets may qualify as tiles and what types of matching rules are permitted, were solved beginning in the 1990s. The strictest version of the problem was solved in 2023, pending peer review. The einstein problem can be seen as a natural extension of the second part of Hilbert's eighteenth problem, which asks for a single polyhedron that tiles Euclidean 3-space, but such that no tessellation by this polyhedron is isohedral. Such anisohedral tiles were found by Karl Reinhardt in 1928, but these anisohedral tiles all tile space periodically.

Proposed solutions

The Socolar–Taylor tile was proposed in 2010 as a solution to the einstein problem, however this tile is not a connected set
The tiling discovered by David Smith
One of the infinite family of Smith–Myers–Kaplan–Goodman-Strauss tiles. Yellow tiles are the reflected versions of the blue tiles.

In 1988, Peter Schmitt discovered a single aperiodic prototile in three-dimensional Euclidean space. While no tiling by this prototile admits a translation as a symmetry, some have a screw symmetry. The screw operation involves a combination of a translation and a rotation through an irrational multiple of π, so no number of repeated operations ever yield a pure translation. This construction was subsequently extended by John Horton Conway and Ludwig Danzer to a convex aperiodic prototile, the Schmitt-Conway-Danzer tile. The presence of the screw symmetry resulted in a reevaluation of the requirements for non-periodicity. Chaim Goodman-Strauss suggested that a tiling be considered strongly aperiodic if it admits no infinite cyclic group of Euclidean motions as symmetries, and that only tile sets which enforce strong aperiodicity be called strongly aperiodic, while other sets are to be called weakly aperiodic.

In 1996, Petra Gummelt constructed a decorated decagonal tile and showed that when two kinds of overlaps between pairs of tiles are allowed, the tiles can cover the plane, but only non-periodically. A tiling is usually understood to be a covering with no overlaps, and so the Gummelt tile is not considered an aperiodic prototile. An aperiodic tile set in the Euclidean plane that consists of just one tile–the Socolar–Taylor tile–was proposed in early 2010 by Joshua Socolar and Joan Taylor. This construction requires matching rules, rules that restrict the relative orientation of two tiles and that make reference to decorations drawn on the tiles, and these rules apply to pairs of nonadjacent tiles. Alternatively, an undecorated tile with no matching rules may be constructed, but the tile is not connected. The construction can be extended to a three-dimensional, connected tile with no matching rules, but this tile allows tilings that are periodic in one direction, and so it is only weakly aperiodic. Moreover, the tile is not simply connected.

In 2022, hobbyist David Smith discovered a "hat"-shaped tile formed from eight copies of a 60°–90°–120°–90° kite, glued edge-to-edge, which seemed to only tile the plane aperiodically. Smith recruited help from mathematicians Craig S. Kaplan, Joseph Samuel Myers, and Chaim Goodman-Strauss, and in 2023 the group posted a preprint proving that the hat, when considered with its mirror image, forms an aperiodic prototile set. Furthermore, the hat can be generalized to an infinite family of tiles with the same aperiodic property. Their proof awaits peer-review and formal publication.

Tile(1,1) from Smith, Myers, Kaplan & Goodmann-Strauss. The spectre is obtained by modifying the edges of this polygon.
Aperiodic tiling with "Tile(1,1)". The tiles are colored according to their orientation.

In 2023 the same team (Smith, Myers, Kaplan, and Goodman-Strauss) posted a new preprint about a family of shapes, called "spectres" and related to the "hat", each of which can tile the plane using only rotations and translations. Furthermore, the "spectre" tile is a "strictly chiral" aperiodic monotile: even if reflections are allowed, every tiling is non-periodic and uses only one chirality of the spectre. That is, there are no tilings of the plane that use both the spectre and its mirror image.

See also

References

  1. Klaassen, Bernhard (2022). "Forcing nonperiodic tilings with one tile using a seed". European Journal of Combinatorics. 100 (C): 103454. arXiv:2109.09384. doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2021.103454. S2CID 237571405.
  2. Senechal, Marjorie (1996) . Quasicrystals and Geometry (corrected paperback ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 22–24. ISBN 0-521-57541-9.
  3. Radin, Charles (1995). "Aperiodic tilings in higher dimensions". Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 123 (11). American Mathematical Society: 3543–3548. doi:10.2307/2161105. JSTOR 2161105. MR 1277129.
  4. Goodman-Strauss, Chaim (10 Jan 2000). "Open Questions in Tiling" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2007-04-18. Retrieved 2007-03-24.
  5. Gummelt, Petra (1996). "Penrose Tilings as Coverings of Congruent Decagons". Geometriae Dedicata. 62 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1007/BF00239998. S2CID 120127686.
  6. Socolar, Joshua E. S.; Taylor, Joan M. (2011). "An Aperiodic Hexagonal Tile". Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A. 118 (8): 2207–2231. arXiv:1003.4279. doi:10.1016/j.jcta.2011.05.001. S2CID 27912253.
  7. Klarreich, Erica (4 Apr 2023). "Hobbyist Finds Math's Elusive 'Einstein' Tile". Quanta.
  8. Smith, David; Myers, Joseph Samuel; Kaplan, Craig S.; Goodman-Strauss, Chaim (Mar 2023). "An aperiodic monotile". arXiv:2303.10798 .
  9. Lawson-Perfect, Christian; Steckles, Katie; Rowlett, Peter (22 Mar 2023). "An aperiodic monotile exists!". The Aperiodical.
  10. Conover, Emily (24 Mar 2023). "Mathematicians have finally discovered an elusive 'einstein' tile". Science News. Retrieved 2023-03-25.
  11. Roberts, Siobhan (29 Mar 2023). "Elusive 'Einstein' Solves a Longstanding Math Problem". New York Times. Retrieved 2023-03-29.
  12. Two tiles have the same color when they can be brought in coincidence by a translation or a rotation of a multiple of 60 degrees.
  13. Smith, David; Myers, Joseph Samuel; Kaplan, Craig S.; Goodman-Strauss, Chaim (2023). "A chiral aperiodic monotile". arXiv:2305.17743 .

External links

Tessellation
Periodic


Aperiodic
Other
By vertex type
Spherical
Regular
Semi-
regular
Hyper-
bolic
Category: